Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1473-1484.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.24
• Agricultural Economy and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles
Construction of evalution system for rural ecological health-care space and emperical study: in case of “Dragon Gate Wonderlands” village scenic spot
SHAO Yingying1,2(
), ZHANG Jianguo2,*()
- 1. College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2. School of Economics and Management, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China
-
Received:2022-02-17Online:2023-06-25Published:2023-07-04
CLC Number:
Cite this article
SHAO Yingying, ZHANG Jianguo. Construction of evalution system for rural ecological health-care space and emperical study: in case of “Dragon Gate Wonderlands” village scenic spot[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1473-1484.
share this article
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.24
Table 1 Evaluation system for rural ecological health-care space
| 目标层 Objective layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 要素层 Element layer | 指标层 Index layer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 乡村生态保健空间评价 Evaluation of rural | B1:美景度 Scenic beauty(0.164) | C1:景观美学 Aesthetics of landscape | D1:季相多样性 Seasonal diversity(0.012) |
| ecological health- care space | (0.089) | D2:景观类型丰富度 Landscape type richness(0.011) | |
| D3:层次丰富性 Hierarchical richness(0.008) | |||
| D4:景观协调性 Landscape coordination(0.023) | |||
| D5:尺度适宜性 Scale suitability(0.011) | |||
| D6:景观维持性 Landscape sustainability(0.010) | |||
| D7:景观卫生 Landscape hygiene(0.014) | |||
| C2:景观特色 Landscape features | D8:地貌地形奇特性 Geomorphy(0.032) | ||
| (0.048) | D9:景观稀有性 Landscape rarity(0.016) | ||
| C3:景观文化 landscape culture | D10:乡土文化丰富度 Richness of local culture(0.018) | ||
| (0.027) | D11:民俗文化表达 Folk culture expression(0.009) | ||
| B2:环境清洁度 Environmental sanitation | C4:环境质量 Environmental quality | D12:空气负离子质量等级 Air negative ion mass grade(0.090) | |
| (0.301) | (0.301) | D13:空气颗粒物浓度 Air particle concentration(0.064) | |
| D14:水体质量 Water quality(0.031) | |||
| D15:土壤质量 Soil quality(0.029) | |||
| D16:空气质量 Air quality(0.061) | |||
| D17:声环境质量 Sound environment quality(0.026) | |||
| B3:舒适度 Comfort degree | C5:气候条件 Climate conditions | D18:人体舒适度 Comfort index of human(0.220) | |
| (0.275) | (0.275) | D19:紫外线辐射强度 UV radiation intensity(0.055) | |
| B4:自然度 Natural degree | C6:植被状况 Vegetation status | D20:植被覆盖率 Vegetation cover rate(0.037) | |
| (0.136) | (0.109) | D21:植物生长状况 Plant growth status(0.015) | |
| D22:植物群落结构特征 Plant community structure characteristics(0.031) | |||
| D23:植物群落物种特征 Plant community species characteristics(0.026) | |||
| C7:人类活动状态 State of human activity | D24:人口密度 Population density(0.003) | ||
| (0.027) | D25:人为活动干扰度 Human disturbance(0.009) | ||
| D26:环境保护情况 Environmental protection(0.015) | |||
| B5:活动开展适宜度 Activity suitability | C8:地形特征 Terrain characteristics | D27:海拔 Altitude(0.017) | |
| (0.124) | (0.051) | D28:地势建设合适程度 Appropriate range of terrain construction(0.034) | |
| C9:区位交通 Location & traffic(0.032) | D29:地理位置 Geographical location(0.006) | ||
| D30:外部交通可达性 External traffic accessibility(0.016) | |||
| D31:内部交通条件 Internal traffic conditions(0.010) | |||
| C10:基础建设 Infrastructure(0.041) | D32:基础设施完善度 Infrastructure perfection(0.014) | ||
| D33:基础设施分布合理性 Rationality of infrastructure distribution(0.011) | |||
| D34:保健设施丰富度 Health facilities richness(0.010) | |||
| D35:安全保障Security(0.006) |
Table 1 Evaluation system for rural ecological health-care space
| 目标层 Objective layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 要素层 Element layer | 指标层 Index layer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 乡村生态保健空间评价 Evaluation of rural | B1:美景度 Scenic beauty(0.164) | C1:景观美学 Aesthetics of landscape | D1:季相多样性 Seasonal diversity(0.012) |
| ecological health- care space | (0.089) | D2:景观类型丰富度 Landscape type richness(0.011) | |
| D3:层次丰富性 Hierarchical richness(0.008) | |||
| D4:景观协调性 Landscape coordination(0.023) | |||
| D5:尺度适宜性 Scale suitability(0.011) | |||
| D6:景观维持性 Landscape sustainability(0.010) | |||
| D7:景观卫生 Landscape hygiene(0.014) | |||
| C2:景观特色 Landscape features | D8:地貌地形奇特性 Geomorphy(0.032) | ||
| (0.048) | D9:景观稀有性 Landscape rarity(0.016) | ||
| C3:景观文化 landscape culture | D10:乡土文化丰富度 Richness of local culture(0.018) | ||
| (0.027) | D11:民俗文化表达 Folk culture expression(0.009) | ||
| B2:环境清洁度 Environmental sanitation | C4:环境质量 Environmental quality | D12:空气负离子质量等级 Air negative ion mass grade(0.090) | |
| (0.301) | (0.301) | D13:空气颗粒物浓度 Air particle concentration(0.064) | |
| D14:水体质量 Water quality(0.031) | |||
| D15:土壤质量 Soil quality(0.029) | |||
| D16:空气质量 Air quality(0.061) | |||
| D17:声环境质量 Sound environment quality(0.026) | |||
| B3:舒适度 Comfort degree | C5:气候条件 Climate conditions | D18:人体舒适度 Comfort index of human(0.220) | |
| (0.275) | (0.275) | D19:紫外线辐射强度 UV radiation intensity(0.055) | |
| B4:自然度 Natural degree | C6:植被状况 Vegetation status | D20:植被覆盖率 Vegetation cover rate(0.037) | |
| (0.136) | (0.109) | D21:植物生长状况 Plant growth status(0.015) | |
| D22:植物群落结构特征 Plant community structure characteristics(0.031) | |||
| D23:植物群落物种特征 Plant community species characteristics(0.026) | |||
| C7:人类活动状态 State of human activity | D24:人口密度 Population density(0.003) | ||
| (0.027) | D25:人为活动干扰度 Human disturbance(0.009) | ||
| D26:环境保护情况 Environmental protection(0.015) | |||
| B5:活动开展适宜度 Activity suitability | C8:地形特征 Terrain characteristics | D27:海拔 Altitude(0.017) | |
| (0.124) | (0.051) | D28:地势建设合适程度 Appropriate range of terrain construction(0.034) | |
| C9:区位交通 Location & traffic(0.032) | D29:地理位置 Geographical location(0.006) | ||
| D30:外部交通可达性 External traffic accessibility(0.016) | |||
| D31:内部交通条件 Internal traffic conditions(0.010) | |||
| C10:基础建设 Infrastructure(0.041) | D32:基础设施完善度 Infrastructure perfection(0.014) | ||
| D33:基础设施分布合理性 Rationality of infrastructure distribution(0.011) | |||
| D34:保健设施丰富度 Health facilities richness(0.010) | |||
| D35:安全保障Security(0.006) |
Table 2 Evaluation standards of indexes of rural ecological health-care space
| 评价指标 Evaluation index | 数据来源 Data source | 评价标准Evaluation standard | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5分 5 points | 4分 4 points | 3分 3 points | 2分 2 points | 1分 1 point | ||
| D1 | 现场调研 Site survey | 四季季相明显 Four seasons | 三季季相明显 Three seasons | 二季季相明显 Two seasons | 一季季相明显 One season | 季相变化不明显 No seasonal characteristics |
| D2 | 现场调研Site survey | ≥0.9 | 0.7~<0.9 | 0.4~<0.7 | 0.1~<0.4 | <0.1 |
| D3 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分丰富 Very abundant | 丰富 Abundant | 一般 Average | 单一 Monotonous | 十分单一 Very monotonous |
| D4 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分协调 Very coordinated | 协调 Coordinated | 一般 Average | 不协调 Incongruous | 十分不协调 Very incongruous |
| D5 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分适宜 Very suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 一般 Average | 不适宜 Inappropriate | 十分不适宜 Very inappropriate |
| D6 | 现场调研 Site survey | 很好 Excellent | 好 Great | 一般 Average | 较差 Bad | 无管理 Unmanaged |
| D7 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分干净,无垃圾 Very clean, no rubbish | 干净,偶有垃圾 Clean, with occasional rubbish | 一般,有少量垃圾 General hygiene, with a small amount of rubbish | 较脏、乱,多量垃圾 Dirty, messy, lots of rubbish | 脏、乱,大量垃圾 Very dirty and messy, a large amount of rubbish |
| D8 | 现场调研 Site survey | 地形多样 Diverse terrain | 高山 High mountains | 低山 Low mountains | 丘陵 Hills | 平原 Plains |
| D9 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分稀有 Very rare | 稀有 Rare | 一般 Average | 常见 Common | 十分常见 Very common |
| D10 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 乡土文化十分多样 High diversity of local culture | 乡土文化数量较多 More local culture | 乡土文化数量一般 Usual level of local culture | 乡土文化单一 Monotonous local culture | 无乡土文化 No local culture |
| D11 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分浓厚 Very thick | 浓厚 Thick | 一般 Average | 淡薄 Few | 十分淡薄 Less |
| D12 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | ≥1.00 | 0.70~<1.00 | 0.50~<0.70 | 0.30~<0.50 | <0.30 |
| D13 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | ≤35 | >35~75 | >75~115 | >115~150 | >150 |
| D14 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 优于Ⅲ类 Better than Class Ⅲ | Ⅲ类 Class Ⅲ | Ⅳ类 Class Ⅳ | Ⅴ类 Class Ⅴ | 劣Ⅴ类 Inferior to Class Ⅴ |
| D15 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 国家标准Ⅰ类 National Standard Class Ⅰ | 国家标准Ⅱ类 National Standard Class Ⅱ | 国家标准Ⅲ类 National Standard Class Ⅲ | 轻度污染 Light pollution | 严重污染 Heavily polluted |
| D16 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 国家标准Ⅰ类 National Standard Class Ⅰ | 国家标准Ⅱ类 National Standard Class Ⅱ | 国家标准Ⅲ类 National Standard Class Ⅲ | 轻度污染 Light pollution | 严重污染 Heavily polluted |
| D17 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 国家标准0类 National Standard Class 0 | 国家标准Ⅰ类 National Standard Class Ⅰ | 国家标准Ⅱ类 National Standard Class Ⅱ | 国家标准Ⅲ类 National Standard Class Ⅲ | 国家标准Ⅳ类 National Standard Class Ⅳ |
| D18 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | ≤4.55 | >4.55~5.75 | >5.75~6.95 | >6.95~9.00 | >9.00 |
| D19 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | <5 | 5~<10 | 10~<15 | 15~<30 | ≥30 |
| D20 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≥90% | 80%~<90% | 70%~<80% | >60%~<70% | ≤60% |
| D21 | 现场调研 Site survey | 长势很好,无病虫害 Grow well, no pests | 长势好,偶有病虫害 Good growth, occasional pests | 长势一般,病虫害 较多,偶有死亡 General growth, more pests and diseases, occasional death | 长势差,病虫害多, 少量死亡 Poor growth, many pests and diseases, a small number of deaths | 长势很差,病虫害很 多,大量死亡 Very poor growth, lots of pests, lots of deaths |
| D22 | 现场调研 Site survey | 具有乔、灌、草3层完 整植被群落结构,各 层次植物物种比例 十分合理 Complete vegetation community structure with three layers of tree, shrub and grass, and reasonable proportion of plant species at each layer | 具有乔、灌、草3层完 整植被群落结构,各 层次植物物种比例 配置一般 Complete vegetation community structure with three layers of tree, shrub and grass, and acceptable proportion of plant species at each layer | 具有2层植被群落结 构,各层次植物物种 比例配置一般 A two-layer vegetation community structure, with acceptable proportion of plant species at each layer | 具有2层植被群落结 构,各层次植物物种 比例配置不合理 A two-layer vegetation community structure, with unreasonable proportion of plant species at each layer | 只有单层植被群落 结构 One layer vegetation community structure |
| D23 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分丰富 Very abundant | 丰富 Abundant | 一般 Average | 较为单一 Monotonous | 单一 Very monotonous |
| D24 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≤200 km-2 | >200~<400 km-2 | 400~<600 km-2 | 600~<800 km-2 | ≥800 km-2 |
| D25 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≤30% | >30%~<50% | 50%~<70% | 70%~90% | >90% |
| D26 | 现场调研 Site survey | 环境保护措施多, 成效显著 Most environmental protection measures, significant results | 环境保护措施较多, 成效明显 Many environmental protection measures, obvious results | 环境保护措施较少, 成效不明显 Less environmental protection measures, less results | 环境保护措施少, 无成效 Lack of environmental protection measures, ineffective | 无环境保护措施 No environmental protection measures |
| D27 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 500~<1 000 | 1 000~<1 500 | 1 500~2 000 | <500 m | >2 000 m |
| D28 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分合适 Very suitable | 合适 Suitable | 一般 Average | 较不合适 Less suitable | 不合适 Inappropriate |
| D29 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≤50 km | >50~<100 km | 100~<150 km | 150~<200 km | ≥200 km |
| D30 | 现场调研 Site survey | 与城市道路联系程 度高,能到达的公共 交通方式多 Very close connection with city roads, available via numerous kinds of public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 较高,能到达的公共 交通方式较多 Close connection with city roads, available via many kinds of public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 一般,能到达的公共 交通方式一般 Fairly connected to city roads. available via public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 差,能达到的公共交 通方式少 Poor connection with city roads, available via limited public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 很差,没有能达到的 公共交通 Very poor connection with city roads, unavailable via public transportation |
| D31 | 现场调研 Site survey | 内部交通联系紧密, 交通方式多样 Very close internal links and numerous kinds of transportation | 内部交通联系较为 紧密,交通方式较多 Close internal links and many kinds of transportation | 内部交通联系一般, 交通方式少 General level of internal links and less kinds of transportation | 内部交通联系不紧 密,交通方式单一 Loose internal links and single mode of transportation | 内部交通联系十分闭 塞,无往来交通方式 Very congested internal links and no transportation |
| D32 | 现场调研 Site survey | 配备完整,数量充足 Fully equipped and sufficient | 配备较为完整,数量 基本满足需求 Equipped to meet the basic demand | 偶有设施缺少,数量 只能满足部分场所 需求 Occasionally lack of facilities, bearable to part of site | 少量设施缺失,数量 不能满足需求 A small number of facilities missing to meet the demand | 大量设施缺失,数量 不能满足活动开展 需求 A large number of facilities missing to carry out activities |
| D33 | 现场调研 Site survey | 分布十分合理 Very well distributed | 分布合理 Well distributed | 分布一般 Rational distribution | 分布不合理 Unreasonable distribution | 分布十分不合理 Very unreasonable distribution |
| D34 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分丰富 Very abundant | 丰富 Abundant | 一般 Average | 单一 Monotonous | 无保健设施 Lack of health facilities |
| D35 | 现场调研Site survey | 很多Very abundant | 多Abundant | 一般Average | 少Few | 无保障No guarantee |
Table 2 Evaluation standards of indexes of rural ecological health-care space
| 评价指标 Evaluation index | 数据来源 Data source | 评价标准Evaluation standard | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5分 5 points | 4分 4 points | 3分 3 points | 2分 2 points | 1分 1 point | ||
| D1 | 现场调研 Site survey | 四季季相明显 Four seasons | 三季季相明显 Three seasons | 二季季相明显 Two seasons | 一季季相明显 One season | 季相变化不明显 No seasonal characteristics |
| D2 | 现场调研Site survey | ≥0.9 | 0.7~<0.9 | 0.4~<0.7 | 0.1~<0.4 | <0.1 |
| D3 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分丰富 Very abundant | 丰富 Abundant | 一般 Average | 单一 Monotonous | 十分单一 Very monotonous |
| D4 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分协调 Very coordinated | 协调 Coordinated | 一般 Average | 不协调 Incongruous | 十分不协调 Very incongruous |
| D5 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分适宜 Very suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 一般 Average | 不适宜 Inappropriate | 十分不适宜 Very inappropriate |
| D6 | 现场调研 Site survey | 很好 Excellent | 好 Great | 一般 Average | 较差 Bad | 无管理 Unmanaged |
| D7 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分干净,无垃圾 Very clean, no rubbish | 干净,偶有垃圾 Clean, with occasional rubbish | 一般,有少量垃圾 General hygiene, with a small amount of rubbish | 较脏、乱,多量垃圾 Dirty, messy, lots of rubbish | 脏、乱,大量垃圾 Very dirty and messy, a large amount of rubbish |
| D8 | 现场调研 Site survey | 地形多样 Diverse terrain | 高山 High mountains | 低山 Low mountains | 丘陵 Hills | 平原 Plains |
| D9 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分稀有 Very rare | 稀有 Rare | 一般 Average | 常见 Common | 十分常见 Very common |
| D10 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 乡土文化十分多样 High diversity of local culture | 乡土文化数量较多 More local culture | 乡土文化数量一般 Usual level of local culture | 乡土文化单一 Monotonous local culture | 无乡土文化 No local culture |
| D11 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分浓厚 Very thick | 浓厚 Thick | 一般 Average | 淡薄 Few | 十分淡薄 Less |
| D12 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | ≥1.00 | 0.70~<1.00 | 0.50~<0.70 | 0.30~<0.50 | <0.30 |
| D13 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | ≤35 | >35~75 | >75~115 | >115~150 | >150 |
| D14 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 优于Ⅲ类 Better than Class Ⅲ | Ⅲ类 Class Ⅲ | Ⅳ类 Class Ⅳ | Ⅴ类 Class Ⅴ | 劣Ⅴ类 Inferior to Class Ⅴ |
| D15 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 国家标准Ⅰ类 National Standard Class Ⅰ | 国家标准Ⅱ类 National Standard Class Ⅱ | 国家标准Ⅲ类 National Standard Class Ⅲ | 轻度污染 Light pollution | 严重污染 Heavily polluted |
| D16 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 国家标准Ⅰ类 National Standard Class Ⅰ | 国家标准Ⅱ类 National Standard Class Ⅱ | 国家标准Ⅲ类 National Standard Class Ⅲ | 轻度污染 Light pollution | 严重污染 Heavily polluted |
| D17 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 国家标准0类 National Standard Class 0 | 国家标准Ⅰ类 National Standard Class Ⅰ | 国家标准Ⅱ类 National Standard Class Ⅱ | 国家标准Ⅲ类 National Standard Class Ⅲ | 国家标准Ⅳ类 National Standard Class Ⅳ |
| D18 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | ≤4.55 | >4.55~5.75 | >5.75~6.95 | >6.95~9.00 | >9.00 |
| D19 | 实地监测 Field monitoring | <5 | 5~<10 | 10~<15 | 15~<30 | ≥30 |
| D20 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≥90% | 80%~<90% | 70%~<80% | >60%~<70% | ≤60% |
| D21 | 现场调研 Site survey | 长势很好,无病虫害 Grow well, no pests | 长势好,偶有病虫害 Good growth, occasional pests | 长势一般,病虫害 较多,偶有死亡 General growth, more pests and diseases, occasional death | 长势差,病虫害多, 少量死亡 Poor growth, many pests and diseases, a small number of deaths | 长势很差,病虫害很 多,大量死亡 Very poor growth, lots of pests, lots of deaths |
| D22 | 现场调研 Site survey | 具有乔、灌、草3层完 整植被群落结构,各 层次植物物种比例 十分合理 Complete vegetation community structure with three layers of tree, shrub and grass, and reasonable proportion of plant species at each layer | 具有乔、灌、草3层完 整植被群落结构,各 层次植物物种比例 配置一般 Complete vegetation community structure with three layers of tree, shrub and grass, and acceptable proportion of plant species at each layer | 具有2层植被群落结 构,各层次植物物种 比例配置一般 A two-layer vegetation community structure, with acceptable proportion of plant species at each layer | 具有2层植被群落结 构,各层次植物物种 比例配置不合理 A two-layer vegetation community structure, with unreasonable proportion of plant species at each layer | 只有单层植被群落 结构 One layer vegetation community structure |
| D23 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分丰富 Very abundant | 丰富 Abundant | 一般 Average | 较为单一 Monotonous | 单一 Very monotonous |
| D24 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≤200 km-2 | >200~<400 km-2 | 400~<600 km-2 | 600~<800 km-2 | ≥800 km-2 |
| D25 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≤30% | >30%~<50% | 50%~<70% | 70%~90% | >90% |
| D26 | 现场调研 Site survey | 环境保护措施多, 成效显著 Most environmental protection measures, significant results | 环境保护措施较多, 成效明显 Many environmental protection measures, obvious results | 环境保护措施较少, 成效不明显 Less environmental protection measures, less results | 环境保护措施少, 无成效 Lack of environmental protection measures, ineffective | 无环境保护措施 No environmental protection measures |
| D27 | 资料收集 Material gathering | 500~<1 000 | 1 000~<1 500 | 1 500~2 000 | <500 m | >2 000 m |
| D28 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分合适 Very suitable | 合适 Suitable | 一般 Average | 较不合适 Less suitable | 不合适 Inappropriate |
| D29 | 资料收集 Material gathering | ≤50 km | >50~<100 km | 100~<150 km | 150~<200 km | ≥200 km |
| D30 | 现场调研 Site survey | 与城市道路联系程 度高,能到达的公共 交通方式多 Very close connection with city roads, available via numerous kinds of public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 较高,能到达的公共 交通方式较多 Close connection with city roads, available via many kinds of public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 一般,能到达的公共 交通方式一般 Fairly connected to city roads. available via public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 差,能达到的公共交 通方式少 Poor connection with city roads, available via limited public transportation | 与城市道路联系程度 很差,没有能达到的 公共交通 Very poor connection with city roads, unavailable via public transportation |
| D31 | 现场调研 Site survey | 内部交通联系紧密, 交通方式多样 Very close internal links and numerous kinds of transportation | 内部交通联系较为 紧密,交通方式较多 Close internal links and many kinds of transportation | 内部交通联系一般, 交通方式少 General level of internal links and less kinds of transportation | 内部交通联系不紧 密,交通方式单一 Loose internal links and single mode of transportation | 内部交通联系十分闭 塞,无往来交通方式 Very congested internal links and no transportation |
| D32 | 现场调研 Site survey | 配备完整,数量充足 Fully equipped and sufficient | 配备较为完整,数量 基本满足需求 Equipped to meet the basic demand | 偶有设施缺少,数量 只能满足部分场所 需求 Occasionally lack of facilities, bearable to part of site | 少量设施缺失,数量 不能满足需求 A small number of facilities missing to meet the demand | 大量设施缺失,数量 不能满足活动开展 需求 A large number of facilities missing to carry out activities |
| D33 | 现场调研 Site survey | 分布十分合理 Very well distributed | 分布合理 Well distributed | 分布一般 Rational distribution | 分布不合理 Unreasonable distribution | 分布十分不合理 Very unreasonable distribution |
| D34 | 现场调研 Site survey | 十分丰富 Very abundant | 丰富 Abundant | 一般 Average | 单一 Monotonous | 无保健设施 Lack of health facilities |
| D35 | 现场调研Site survey | 很多Very abundant | 多Abundant | 一般Average | 少Few | 无保障No guarantee |
Fig.1 Spatial distribution of monitor plots
Fig.1 Spatial distribution of monitor plots
Table 3 Fuzzy evaluation results of ecological health space of “Dragon Gate Wonderlands” village scenic spot
| 目标层 Objective layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result | 准则层 Criterion layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result | 要素层 Element layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result | 指标层 Index Layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 很好Excellent | B1 | 一般Average | C1 | 一般Average | D1 | 一般 Average |
| D2 | 差Bad | ||||||
| D3 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D4 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D5 | 好Great | ||||||
| D6 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D7 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| C2 | 一般 Average | D8 | 一般 Average | ||||
| D9 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| C3 | 好Great | D10 | 好Great | ||||
| D11 | 好Great | ||||||
| B2 | 很好Excellent | C4 | 很好Excellent | D12 | 很好Excellent | ||
| D13 | 好Great | ||||||
| D14 | 好Great | ||||||
| D15 | 很好Excellent | ||||||
| D16 | 很好Excellent | ||||||
| D17 | 好Great | ||||||
| B3 | 很好Excellent | C5 | 很好Excellent | D18 | 很好Excellent | ||
| D1 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| B4 | 很好Excellent | C6 | 一般 Average | D20 | 很好Excellent | ||
| D21 | 好Great | ||||||
| D22 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D23 | 好Great | ||||||
| C7 | 好Great | D24 | 很好Excellent | ||||
| D25 | 很好Excellent | ||||||
| D26 | 好Great | ||||||
| B5 | 好Great | C8 | 好Great | D27 | 好Great | ||
| D28 | 好Great | ||||||
| C9 | 好Great | D29 | 好Great | ||||
| D30 | 好Great | ||||||
| D31 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| C10 | 一般 Average | D32 | 一般 Average | ||||
| D33 | 差Bad | ||||||
| D34 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D35 | 一般 Average |
Table 3 Fuzzy evaluation results of ecological health space of “Dragon Gate Wonderlands” village scenic spot
| 目标层 Objective layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result | 准则层 Criterion layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result | 要素层 Element layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result | 指标层 Index Layer | 评价结果 Evaluation result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 很好Excellent | B1 | 一般Average | C1 | 一般Average | D1 | 一般 Average |
| D2 | 差Bad | ||||||
| D3 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D4 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D5 | 好Great | ||||||
| D6 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D7 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| C2 | 一般 Average | D8 | 一般 Average | ||||
| D9 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| C3 | 好Great | D10 | 好Great | ||||
| D11 | 好Great | ||||||
| B2 | 很好Excellent | C4 | 很好Excellent | D12 | 很好Excellent | ||
| D13 | 好Great | ||||||
| D14 | 好Great | ||||||
| D15 | 很好Excellent | ||||||
| D16 | 很好Excellent | ||||||
| D17 | 好Great | ||||||
| B3 | 很好Excellent | C5 | 很好Excellent | D18 | 很好Excellent | ||
| D1 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| B4 | 很好Excellent | C6 | 一般 Average | D20 | 很好Excellent | ||
| D21 | 好Great | ||||||
| D22 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D23 | 好Great | ||||||
| C7 | 好Great | D24 | 很好Excellent | ||||
| D25 | 很好Excellent | ||||||
| D26 | 好Great | ||||||
| B5 | 好Great | C8 | 好Great | D27 | 好Great | ||
| D28 | 好Great | ||||||
| C9 | 好Great | D29 | 好Great | ||||
| D30 | 好Great | ||||||
| D31 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| C10 | 一般 Average | D32 | 一般 Average | ||||
| D33 | 差Bad | ||||||
| D34 | 一般 Average | ||||||
| D35 | 一般 Average |
| [1] | KAPLAN S, TALBOT J F. Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience[M]//ALTMAN I, WOHLWILL J F. Behavior and the natural environment. Boston: Springer US, 1983: 163-203. |
| [2] | KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 |
| [3] | ULRICH R S. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery[J]. Science, 1984, 224(4647): 420-421. |
| [4] | ULRICH R S, SIMONS R F, LOSITO B D, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1991, 11(3): 201-230. |
| [5] | GUO J, XU Z. Analysis on the design elements and strategies of horticultural therapy in the healing environment of patients with limb dysfunction[C]// Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2018). April 25-27, 2018. Moscow, Russia. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2018. |
| [6] | 金学智, 陈本源. 园林养生功能简论: 艺术养生学系列论文之三[J]. 文艺研究, 1997(4): 114-127. |
| JIN X Z, CHEN B Y. Brief discussion on the functions of garden health preservation: the third series of papers on art health preservation[J]. Literature & Art Studies, 1997(4): 114-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 谭益民, 森林康养基地规划设计研究[J]. 湖南工业大学学报, 张志强. 2017, 31(1): 1-9. |
| TAN Y M, ZHANG Z Q. Study on the planning and design of forest therapy base[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Technology, 2017, 31(1): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 胡译文, 秦永胜, 李荣桓, 等. 北京市三种典型城市绿地类型的保健功能分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(12): 1872-1878. |
| HU Y W, QIN Y S, LI R H, et al. Study on the health function of three typical urban greenspaces in Beijing[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 20(12): 1872-1878. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 晏琪, 刘苑秋, 文野, 等. 基于因子分析的森林康养空间评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(1): 81-86. |
| YAN Q, LIU Y Q, WEN Y, et al. Study of evaluation index system in forest convalescent space based on factor analysis[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2020, 36(1): 81-86. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 陈凯, 洪昕晨, 林洲瑜, 等. 基于GST法与AHP法的森林公园康复性景观评价指标体系构建[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(1): 118-126. |
| CHEN K, HONG X C, LIN Z Y, et al. The construction of evaluation system of healing landscape in forest park based on GST and AHP[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2017, 39(1): 118-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 赵咪咪. “健康中国”视阈下城郊森林公园游憩适宜性评价: 以丽水白云森林公园为例[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018. |
| ZHAO M M. Evaluation of recreational suitability in the suburb of forest park under the vision of “healthy China”: a case study of Baiyun forest park in Lishui[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | MARCUS C C, BARNES M M. Gardens in healthcare facilities: uses, therapeutic benefits, and design recommendations[M]. Martinez, CA: The Center for Health Design, Inc., 1995. |
| [13] | 杨芳绒, 张晨曦, 鲁黎明. 基于AHP法的郑州城市公园康养景观评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(1): 247-252. |
| YANG F R, ZHANG C X, LU L M. Healthy landscape evaluation of urban parks in Zhengzhou City based on AHP[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2022, 37(1): 247-252. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 孟玮. 健康视域下的城市公园绿地休闲游憩适宜性评价: 以杭州城北体育公园为例[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2020. |
| MENG W. Evaluation on the suitability of urban parks and green spaces for leisure and recreation from the perspective of health: take Hangzhou Chengbei Sports Park as an example[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 赵悦. 基于康复支持性评价的哈尔滨市综合医院外环境景观改造策略研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2015. |
| ZHAO Y. Research on the external environment landscape reform of the comprehensive hospital in Harbin based on the rehabilitation support evaluation[D]. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 郑洁, 俞益武, 包亚芳. 疗养院康复景观环境评价指标体系的构建[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(5): 919-926. |
| ZHENG J, YU Y W, BAO Y F. Construction of evaluation index system of herapeutic landscape environment in sanatoriums[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2018, 35(5): 919-926. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 邬涛, 汤晓敏. 老年公寓外环境康复支持性评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2013, 31(5): 89-94. |
| WU T, TANG X M. Therapeutic supportive evaluation index system of external environment of apartment for the elderly[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University(Agricultural Science), 2013, 31(5): 89-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 吴思雨, 李运远. 北京社区公园康复性景观评价模型的构建[J]. 北京规划建设, 2019(3): 108-112. |
| WU S Y, LI Y Y. Construction of rehabilitation landscape evaluation model for community parks in Beijing[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2019(3): 108-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 张建国, 俞益武, 章志攀, 等. 衢州七里旅游区环境质量评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2007, 22(4): 167-170. |
| ZHANG J G, YU Y W, ZHANG Z P, et al. The evalution of environmental quality in Qili tourism area of Quzhou[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2007, 22(4): 167-170. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 刘畅, 徐宁, 宋靖达, 等. 城市森林公园游人热舒适感受与空间选择[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3561-3569. |
| LIU C, XU N, SONG J D, et al. Research on visitors’ thermal sensation and space choices in an urban forest park[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(10): 3561-3569. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 郝泽周, 王成, 徐心慧, 等. 深圳城市森林声景观对人体心理及生理影响分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3): 231-239. |
| HAO Z Z, WANG C, XU X H, et al. Effect of Shenzhen urban forest soundscape on psychological and physiological changes of human beings[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(3): 231-239. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 陶雪莹, 张伟宁, 鲁绍伟, 等. 北京城市森林空气负离子与PM2.5颗粒物交互效应研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2020, 42(6): 1184-1194. |
| TAO X Y, ZHANG W N, LU S W, et al. Interaction between air negative ions and PM2.5 particles in urban forest of Beijing[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2020, 42(6): 1184-1194. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 彭巍, 李明文, 杜鹏飞. “天然杀菌素”植物精气国内外研究进展[J]. 防护林科技, 2020(12): 69-71. |
| PENG W, LI M W, DU P F. Research progress of “natural fungicides” plant essence at home and abroad[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2020(12): 69-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 金媛媛, 王淑芳. 乡村振兴战略背景下生态旅游产业与健康产业的融合发展研究[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(1): 138-143. |
| JIN Y Y, WANG S F. Research on the integration development of ecotourism industry and health industry under the background of rural revitalization strategy[J]. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(1): 138-143. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 钟永德, 罗明春, 袁建琼. 森林美学的发展及其在森林景观规划中的应用[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2004, 24(4): 82-87. |
| ZHONG Y D, LUO M C, YUAN J Q. Development of forest aesthetics and its application in forest landscape planning[J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2004, 24(4): 82-87. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 张毅, 崔留欣, 程学敏, 等. 空气负离子对小鼠免疫功能的影响[J]. 河南医科大学学报, 1996, 31(2): 56-59. |
| ZHANG Y, CUI L X, CHENG X M, et al. The effect of negative air ions on the immunologlcal function of mice[J]. Journa of Henan Medical University, 1996, 31(2): 56-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | MALIK A, SINGH K, SINGH M. Effect of negative air ions on physiological and perceived psychological stress during computer operation[J]. International Journal of Environment and Health, 2010, 4(1): 67. |
| [28] | 段文军. 深圳园山三种典型城市森林康养环境保健因子动态变化[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2017. |
| DUAN W J. The spatial and temoral variations of healthcare factors in three typical urban forest environment of Yuanshan Park in Shenzhen, South China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 连泽峰, 刘滨谊. 风景园林小气候对人体自主神经系统的健康作用的测试分析[C]// 中国风景园林学会2019年会论文集: 下册. 上海: 中国风景园林学会, 2019: 289-296. |
| [30] | 赵晓龙, 卞晴, 赵冬琪, 等. 寒地城市公园春季休闲体力活动强度与植被群落微气候调节效应适应性研究[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(2): 42-48. |
| ZHAO X L, BIAN Q, ZHAO D Q, et al. Research on the adaptability between the leisure physical activity intensity and micro-climate regulation of vegetation community of cold region parks in spring[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2018, 34(2): 42-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | KELLERT S R, WILSON E O. The biophilia hypothesis[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1993. |
| [32] | 晏俊雯. 北京市部分公园绿地公众自然度感知评价研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020. |
| YAN J W. A study on evaluating the public perception of naturalness in some parks in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | DONG Yanmin, YAN Fengxian. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination of agricultural high-quality development in China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 170-182. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
