Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 1279-1289.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230347
• Animal Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Wenwena,b(), HU Lianqinga,b, ZHOU Wanhaia,b,*(
), WEI Qinb, FENG Ruizhangb, ZHAO Xinb, CHE Litaoa, CHEN Jinyua
Received:
2023-03-14
Online:
2024-06-25
Published:
2024-07-02
CLC Number:
LIU Wenwen, HU Lianqing, ZHOU Wanhai, WEI Qin, FENG Ruizhang, ZHAO Xin, CHE Litao, CHEN Jinyu. Effects of different contents of Camphora longepaniculata leaves in diets on intestinal pH, cecal fermentation and cecal microbiota of meat rabbits[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1279-1289.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230347
原料 Ingredients | 不同试验组的饲粮组成Composition of diets in different test groups | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | B组Group B | C组Group C | D组Group D | |
豆粕 Soybean meal | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
玉米Maize | 21.50 | 19.50 | 18.00 | 15.00 |
苜蓿草粉 Alfalfa meal | 22.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 |
麸皮 Wheat bran | 18.00 | 17.00 | 15.50 | 12.50 |
米糠 Rice bran | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.0 | 15.00 |
食盐 NaCl | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
骨肉粉 Bone tankage | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
油樟叶 Cinnamomum longepaniculatum leaves | 0.00 | 3.00 | 6.00 | 12.00 |
预混料Premix | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
合计 Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Table 1 Composition of experimental diets %
原料 Ingredients | 不同试验组的饲粮组成Composition of diets in different test groups | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | B组Group B | C组Group C | D组Group D | |
豆粕 Soybean meal | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
玉米Maize | 21.50 | 19.50 | 18.00 | 15.00 |
苜蓿草粉 Alfalfa meal | 22.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 |
麸皮 Wheat bran | 18.00 | 17.00 | 15.50 | 12.50 |
米糠 Rice bran | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.0 | 15.00 |
食盐 NaCl | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
骨肉粉 Bone tankage | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
油樟叶 Cinnamomum longepaniculatum leaves | 0.00 | 3.00 | 6.00 | 12.00 |
预混料Premix | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
合计 Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
指标 Index | 不同试验组的营养水平Nutrients levels in different test groups | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | B组Group B | C组Group C | D组Group D | |
粗蛋白质含量 Crude Protein content | 17.90 | 18.02 | 18.48 | 18.84 |
粗脂肪含量 Ether extract content | 3.63 | 3.34 | 3.32 | 3.58 |
粗纤维含量 Crude fiber content | 13.55 | 13.76 | 13.85 | 13.71 |
中性洗涤纤维含量 Neutral detergent fiber content | 38.92 | 39.34 | 39.80 | 40.71 |
酸性洗涤纤维含量 Acid detergent fiber content | 25.63 | 26.43 | 26.95 | 27.48 |
粗灰分含量 Ash content | 10.72 | 10.69 | 10.70 | 10.70 |
钙含量 Ca content | 1.15 | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.17 |
磷含量 Total phosphorus content | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.53 |
赖氨酸含量 Lysine content | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
蛋氨酸+半胱氨酸含量 Methionine+cysteine content | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.56 |
Table 2 Nnutrients levels of experimental diets %
指标 Index | 不同试验组的营养水平Nutrients levels in different test groups | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | B组Group B | C组Group C | D组Group D | |
粗蛋白质含量 Crude Protein content | 17.90 | 18.02 | 18.48 | 18.84 |
粗脂肪含量 Ether extract content | 3.63 | 3.34 | 3.32 | 3.58 |
粗纤维含量 Crude fiber content | 13.55 | 13.76 | 13.85 | 13.71 |
中性洗涤纤维含量 Neutral detergent fiber content | 38.92 | 39.34 | 39.80 | 40.71 |
酸性洗涤纤维含量 Acid detergent fiber content | 25.63 | 26.43 | 26.95 | 27.48 |
粗灰分含量 Ash content | 10.72 | 10.69 | 10.70 | 10.70 |
钙含量 Ca content | 1.15 | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.17 |
磷含量 Total phosphorus content | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.53 |
赖氨酸含量 Lysine content | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
蛋氨酸+半胱氨酸含量 Methionine+cysteine content | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.56 |
试验组Test group | 十二指肠Duodenum | 空肠Jejunum | 回肠Ileum | 盲肠Cecum | 结肠Colon |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 6.24±0.29 | 6.75±0.24 | 7.09±0.29 | 6.23±0.22 | 6.72±0.21 |
B组Group B | 6.63±0.35 | 6.49±0.31 | 7.78±0.10 | 6.33±0.06 | 6.61±0.39 |
C组Group C | 6.45±0.44 | 6.14±0.08 | 7.58±0.11 | 6.08±0.07 | 6.21±0.25 |
D组Group D | 6.64±0.34 | 6.32±0.12 | 7.04±0.24 | 6.12±0.23 | 6.22±0.38 |
Table 3 Effects of treatments on pH in intestines of meat rabbits (n=5)
试验组Test group | 十二指肠Duodenum | 空肠Jejunum | 回肠Ileum | 盲肠Cecum | 结肠Colon |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 6.24±0.29 | 6.75±0.24 | 7.09±0.29 | 6.23±0.22 | 6.72±0.21 |
B组Group B | 6.63±0.35 | 6.49±0.31 | 7.78±0.10 | 6.33±0.06 | 6.61±0.39 |
C组Group C | 6.45±0.44 | 6.14±0.08 | 7.58±0.11 | 6.08±0.07 | 6.21±0.25 |
D组Group D | 6.64±0.34 | 6.32±0.12 | 7.04±0.24 | 6.12±0.23 | 6.22±0.38 |
试验组 Test group | 乙酸含量 Acetic acid content | 丙酸含量 Propionic acid content | 丁酸含量 Butyric acid content | 戊酸含量 Valeric acid content | 异丁酸含量 Isobutyric acid content | 异戊酸含量 Isovaleric acid content | 总挥发性脂肪酸含量 Total volatile fatty acid contnet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 36.72±3.45 | 8.02±0.79 | 11.35±0.97 | 0.81±0.07 | 0.41±0.10 | 0.39±0.07 | 57.71±3.84 |
B组Group B | 39.18±3.73 | 7.42±0.56 | 12.45±0.85 | 0.74±0.16 | 0.39±0.09 | 0.52±0.15 | 60.69±4.54 |
C组Group C | 38.27±2.36 | 7.18±0.21 | 9.92±1.00 | 0.96±0.09 | 0.52±0.09 | 0.64±0.11 | 57.49±2.17 |
D组Group D | 35.56±2.01 | 6.94±0.64 | 10.39±1.48 | 0.77±0.18 | 0.43±0.87 | 0.49±0.08 | 54.48±2.32 |
Table 4 Effects of treatments on volatile fatty acid contents in cecum of meat rabbits (n=5) mmol·L-1
试验组 Test group | 乙酸含量 Acetic acid content | 丙酸含量 Propionic acid content | 丁酸含量 Butyric acid content | 戊酸含量 Valeric acid content | 异丁酸含量 Isobutyric acid content | 异戊酸含量 Isovaleric acid content | 总挥发性脂肪酸含量 Total volatile fatty acid contnet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 36.72±3.45 | 8.02±0.79 | 11.35±0.97 | 0.81±0.07 | 0.41±0.10 | 0.39±0.07 | 57.71±3.84 |
B组Group B | 39.18±3.73 | 7.42±0.56 | 12.45±0.85 | 0.74±0.16 | 0.39±0.09 | 0.52±0.15 | 60.69±4.54 |
C组Group C | 38.27±2.36 | 7.18±0.21 | 9.92±1.00 | 0.96±0.09 | 0.52±0.09 | 0.64±0.11 | 57.49±2.17 |
D组Group D | 35.56±2.01 | 6.94±0.64 | 10.39±1.48 | 0.77±0.18 | 0.43±0.87 | 0.49±0.08 | 54.48±2.32 |
试验组 Test group | OTU数目 OTU number | Shannon指数 Shannon index | Simpson指数 Simpson index | Chaol指数 Chaol index | ACE指数 ACE index | 覆盖率 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 679.33±43.84 ab | 4.19±0.31 | 0.06±0.05 | 580.90±13.70 | 570.69±9.49 | 0.996 7±0.000 2 |
B组Group B | 637.33±73.57 b | 4.10±0.49 | 0.09±0.01 | 528.01±36.06 | 514.26±31.03 | 0.997 8±0.000 2 |
C组Group C | 796.00±61.02 a | 4.56±0.05 | 0.03±0.01 | 619.60±67.84 | 601.77±73.03 | 0.996 9±0.000 4 |
D组Group D | 774.00±41.58 a | 4.71±0.47 | 0.02±0.01 | 682.57±153.93 | 674.48±135.26 | 0.996 4±0.000 9 |
Table 5 Effects of treatments on Alpha diversity indexes of cecal bacteria of meat rabbits (n=4)
试验组 Test group | OTU数目 OTU number | Shannon指数 Shannon index | Simpson指数 Simpson index | Chaol指数 Chaol index | ACE指数 ACE index | 覆盖率 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 679.33±43.84 ab | 4.19±0.31 | 0.06±0.05 | 580.90±13.70 | 570.69±9.49 | 0.996 7±0.000 2 |
B组Group B | 637.33±73.57 b | 4.10±0.49 | 0.09±0.01 | 528.01±36.06 | 514.26±31.03 | 0.997 8±0.000 2 |
C组Group C | 796.00±61.02 a | 4.56±0.05 | 0.03±0.01 | 619.60±67.84 | 601.77±73.03 | 0.996 9±0.000 4 |
D组Group D | 774.00±41.58 a | 4.71±0.47 | 0.02±0.01 | 682.57±153.93 | 674.48±135.26 | 0.996 4±0.000 9 |
试验组 Test group | OTU数目 OTU number | Shannon指数 Shannon index | Simpson指数 Simpson index | Chaol指数 Chaol index | ACE指数 ACE index | 覆盖率 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 19.67±1.15 b | 0.35±0.21 | 0.84±0.12 | 12.83±5.62 | 15.41±4.83 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
B组Group B | 15.33±2.08 c | 0.31±0.01 | 0.86±0.01 | 12.67±4.62 | 24.78±7.51 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
C组Group C | 25.00±1.73 a | 0.39±0.02 | 0.82±0.02 | 15.75±5.83 | 27.39±8.69 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
D组Group D | 17.67±2.08 b | 0.31±0.03 | 0.86±0.02 | 25.50±3.54 | 36.28±2.50 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
Table 6 Effects of treatments on Alpha diversity indexes of cecal fungi of meat rabbits (n=4)
试验组 Test group | OTU数目 OTU number | Shannon指数 Shannon index | Simpson指数 Simpson index | Chaol指数 Chaol index | ACE指数 ACE index | 覆盖率 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A组Group A | 19.67±1.15 b | 0.35±0.21 | 0.84±0.12 | 12.83±5.62 | 15.41±4.83 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
B组Group B | 15.33±2.08 c | 0.31±0.01 | 0.86±0.01 | 12.67±4.62 | 24.78±7.51 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
C组Group C | 25.00±1.73 a | 0.39±0.02 | 0.82±0.02 | 15.75±5.83 | 27.39±8.69 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
D组Group D | 17.67±2.08 b | 0.31±0.03 | 0.86±0.02 | 25.50±3.54 | 36.28±2.50 | 0.999 9±0.000 1 |
[1] | ZHAO X, YAN Y, ZHOU W H, et al. Transcriptome and metabolome reveal the accumulation of secondary metabolites in different varieties of Cinnamomum longepaniculatum[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2022, 22(1): 243. |
[2] | HUANG J F, YANG L Y, ZOU Y, et al. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of three isomeric terpineols of Cinnamomum longepaniculatum leaf oil[J]. Folia Microbiologica, 2021, 66(1): 59-67. |
[3] | 杜永华, 敖光辉, 魏琴, 等. 油樟叶总黄酮和总多糖的抑菌活性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(11): 408-410. |
DU Y H, AO G H, WEI Q, et al. Antimicrobial activity of total flavonoids and polysaccharides from Cinnamomum camphora leaves[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(11): 408-410. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | LIU Z Z, MO K L, FEI S M, et al. Efficient approach for the extraction of proanthocyanidins from Cinnamomum longepaniculatum leaves using ultrasonic irradiation and an evaluation of their inhibition activity on digestive enzymes and antioxidant activity in vitro[J]. Journal of Separation Science, 2017, 40(15): 3100-3113. |
[5] | SONG X, YIN Z Q, YE K C, et al. Anti-hepatoma effect of safrole from Cinnamomum longepaniculatum leaf essential oil in vitro[J]. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 2014, 7(5): 2265-2272. |
[6] | 李念珍, 张力天, 郑玉. 油樟叶渣发酵床对肉鸡生产性能和免疫器官指数的影响[J]. 兽医导刊, 2020(23): 124-125. |
LI N Z, ZHANG L T, ZHENG Y. Effects of Cinnamomum camphora leaf residue fermentation bed on production performance and immune organ index of broilers[J]. Veterinary Orientation, 2020(23): 124-125. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 刘宇. 油樟叶挥发油β-环糊精包合物的研制及其对鸡自然感染大肠杆菌病的疗效观察[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012. |
LIU Y. Study on the preparation of β-cyclodextrin inclusion compound with volatile oil of Cinnamomum longepaniculatum leaves and its efficacy on chicken naturally infected colibacillosis[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | QAID M M, AL-MUFARREJ S I, AZZAM M M, et al. Dietary cinnamon bark affects growth performance, carcass characteristics, and breast meat quality in broiler infected with Eimeria tenella oocysts[J]. Animals, 2022, 12(2): 166. |
[9] | OGBUEWU I P, MBAJIORGU C A. Potential of leaf and seeds of tropical plants in chicken diets: effect on spermatozoa and egg production[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2019, 51(2): 267-277. |
[10] | BAKARE A G, CAWAKI P, LEDUA I, et al. Acceptability, growth performance and nutritional status of chickens fed cassava leaf meal (CLM)-based diets[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2020, 52(5): 2481-2489. |
[11] | ZHAO X Q, GUO S, LU Y Y, et al. Lycium barbarum L. leaves ameliorate type 2 diabetes in rats by modulating metabolic profiles and gut microbiota composition[J]. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2020, 121: 109559. |
[12] | LYU W T, LIU X T, LU L Z, et al. Cecal microbiota modulates fat deposition in Muscovy ducks[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2021, 8: 609348. |
[13] | CHEN R, LIU B, WANG X Y, et al. Effects of polysaccharide from Pueraria lobata on gut microbiota in mice[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 158: 740-749. |
[14] | 吕尚揆, 莘余, 樊磊, 等. 葛根多糖对犊牛血清抗氧化、免疫指标及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(3): 1696-1704. |
LYU S K, SHEN Y, FAN L, et al. Effects of Pueraria polysaccharides on serum antioxidant and immune indexes and gut microbiota of calves[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(3): 1696-1704. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | YASOOB T B, YU D F, KHALID A R, et al. Oral administration of Moringa oleifera leaf powder relieves oxidative stress, modulates mucosal immune response and cecal microbiota after exposure to heat stress in New Zealand White rabbits[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2021, 12(1): 66. |
[16] | AL-SAGHEER A A, ABD EL-HACK M E, ALAGAWANY M, et al. Paulownia leaves as a new feed resource: chemical composition and effects on growth, carcasses, digestibility, blood biochemistry, and intestinal bacterial populations of growing rabbits[J]. Animals, 2019, 9(3): 95. |
[17] | 孙海涛, 王勇, 刘公言, 等. 饲粮不同比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔胃肠道发育、盲肠发酵和盲肠微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(5): 2875-2886. |
SUN H T, WANG Y, LIU G Y, et al. Effects of different ratios of ginger straw substituted for peanut seedling in diets on gastrointestinal development, cecal fermentation and cecal microflora of Laiwu black rabbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(5): 2875-2886. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 宋中齐, 干友民, 谭剑蓉, 等. 白三叶对肉兔肠黏膜形态、肠道消化酶活性和盲肠发酵的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25(8): 1878-1885. |
SONG Z Q, GAN Y M, TAN J R, et al. Effects of white clover on intestinal mucosal morphology, intestinal digestive enzyme activity and caecum fermentation of meat rabbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013, 25(8): 1878-1885. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 刘福鑫, 来宁洁, 于志凯, 等. 香芹酚对肉兔肠道形态、胃肠道pH、盲肠发酵和微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(6): 3906-3917. |
LIU F X, LAI N J, YU Z K, et al. Effects of carvacrol on intestinal morphology, gastrointestinal pH, cecal fermentation and microflora of meat rabbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(6): 3906-3917. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 王光富. 植物精油和有机酸对蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质及肠道健康的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018. |
WANG G F. Effects of essential oil and/or organic acids on the performance, egg quality and intestinal health of laying hens[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | GIDENNE T, JEHL N, SEGURA M, et al. Microbial activity in the caecum of the rabbit around weaning: impact of a dietary fibre deficiency and of intake level[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2002, 99(1/2/3/4): 107-118. |
[22] | CHAO H Y, LI F C. Effect of level of fibre on performance and digestion traits in growing rabbits[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2008, 144(3/4): 279-291. |
[23] | SU Y, YAO W, PEREZ-GUTIERREZ O N, et al. 16S ribosomal RNA-based methods to monitor changes in the hindgut bacterial community of piglets after oral administration of Lactobacillus sobrius S1[J]. Anaerobe, 2008, 14(2): 78-86. |
[24] | 张江亮. 饲粮添加菊粉对断奶幼兔生产性能、血清指标、盲肠微生物区系和代谢物的影响[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021. |
ZHANG J L. Effects of detary iulin on gowth prformance, serum parameters, cecal microflora and metabolite of weaned rabbits[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 程浩, 唐圣果, 贺长青, 等. 饲粮添加凹凸棒石负载植物精油复合物对蛋鸡生产性能和肠道微生物的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(5): 2631-2641. |
CHENG H, TANG S G, HE C Q, et al. Effects of dietary essential oil/palygorskite composite on performance and intestinal microflora of laying hens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(5): 2631-2641. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | TANG W J, QIAN Y, YU B, et al. Effects of Bacillus subtilis DSM32315 supplementation and dietary crude protein level on performance, gut barrier function and microbiota profile in weaned piglets1[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 97(5): 2125-2138. |
[27] | 梁小瑞, 王丹阳, 乔彦杰, 等. 三味清热类中药水提物对肉仔鸡肠道菌群和黏膜屏障功能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47(7): 2043-2054. |
LIANG X R, WANG D Y, QIAO Y J, et al. Effects of water extract of three qingre Chinese medicine on intestinal flora and mucosal barrier function of broilers[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 47(7): 2043-2054. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 魏宇超, 王凤霞, 张灿, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌对肉兔肠道结构、盲肠挥发性脂肪酸含量和微生物多样性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(12): 7021-7032. |
WEI Y C, WANG F X, ZHANG C, et al. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on intestinal structure, cecal volatile fatty acid contents and microbial diversity of meat rabbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(12): 7021-7032. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 武帅, 郭东新. 饲粮中添加花生秧对伊拉兔肠道菌群的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(6): 2735-2744. |
WU S, GUO D X. Effects of diet supplemented with peanut vine on intestinal flora of Ira rabbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(6): 2735-2744. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | RODIÑO-JANEIRO B K, VICARIO M, ALONSO-COTONER C, et al. A review of microbiota and irritable bowel syndrome: future in therapies[J]. Advances in Therapy, 2018, 35(3): 289-310. |
[31] | ROOKS M G, GARRETT W S. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity[J]. Nature Reviews Immunology, 2016, 16(6): 341-352. |
[32] | WILKOWSKA A, NOWAK A, ANTCZAK-CHROBOT A, et al. Structurally different pectic oligosaccharides produced from apple pomace and their biological activity in vitro[J]. Foods, 2019, 8(9): 365. |
[33] | 冯国亮, 郑建婷, 曹亮, 等. 饲粮中添加苹果渣对伊拉肉兔盲肠微生物多样性的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2020, 41(15): 44-50. |
FENG G L, ZHENG J T, CAO L, et al. Effect of diet supplemented with apple pomace on caecal microbial diversity of meat rabbits[J]. Feed Industry, 2020, 41(15): 44-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | LIU X M, MAO B Y, GU J Y, et al. Blautia: a new functional genus with potential probiotic properties?[J]. Gut Microbes, 2021, 13(1): 1-21. |
[35] | HALLIDAY M J, GILES H E, PADMANABHA J, et al. The efficacy of a cultured Synergistes jonesii inoculum to control hydroxypyridone toxicity in Bos indicus steers fed leucaena/grass diets[J]. Animal Production Science, 2019, 59(4): 696. |
[36] | NAMTED S, POUNGPONG K, LOONGYAI W, et al. Dietary autolysed yeast modulates blood profiles, small intestinal morphology and caecal microbiota of weaning pigs[J]. Animal, 2022, 16(11): 100660. |
[37] | YANG Q, WEI C C, GUO S T, et al. Cloning and characterization of a L-lactate dehydrogenase gene from Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6[J]. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2020, 36(12): 182. |
[38] | 张雪娇, 王立志. 饲粮中性洗涤纤维水平对山羊瘤胃细菌结构及组成的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(4): 1377-1386. |
ZHANG X J, WANG L Z. Effects of dietary neutral detergent fibre level on structure and composition of rumen bacteria in goats[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(4): 1377-1386. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | ABECIA L, RODRÍGUEZ-ROMERO N, YAÑEZ-RUIZ D R, et al. Biodiversity and fermentative activity of caecal microbial communities in wild and farm rabbits from Spain[J]. Anaerobe, 2012, 18(3): 344-349. |
[1] | ZHANG Hongfang, QIAN Tao, JIN Ting, XIE Xiaoling, WU Choufei, XIAO Yingping, MA Lingyan. Gut microbial profiles and its developmental changes of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 780-789. |
[2] | GUI Guohong, YANG Hua, ZHU Jiangqun, ZHU Jianfeng, XIAO Yingping, XU E. Study on microbial community structure in chilled chicken during cold storage [J]. , 2019, 31(1): 47-55. |
[3] | HAN Li-na, DING Zhe-li, ZENG Hui-cai, ZHENG Wei, HE Ying-dui, GE Yu. Effect of functional organic fertilizer on growth of Chinese cabbage [J]. , 2016, 28(10): 1718-1723. |
[4] | YU You-ping;CAI Xin-zhong;ZHU Xiao-xiang;*. Comparative analysis of microbial community structures in soils from rice-upland crop rotation fields by PLFA profile technique [J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1061. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||