Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 231-244.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231296
• Agricultural Economy and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIAN Han1(), WEN Changcun2, LIU Qiang1,3,*(
)
Received:
2023-11-14
Online:
2025-01-25
Published:
2025-02-14
CLC Number:
QIAN Han, WEN Changcun, LIU Qiang. Financing constraints, green subsidies and adoption of green production technologies in family farms[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 231-244.
分组变量 Grouping variables | 样本量 Sample size | 比例 Percent- age/% | 分组变量 Grouping variables | 样本量 Sample size | 比例 Percent- age/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄Age | 0~<40 | 194 | 23.04 | 农场劳动人数 Number of workers | 0~<5 | 196 | 23.28 |
40~<50 | 300 | 35.63 | 5~<12 | 413 | 49.05 | ||
50~<60 | 308 | 36.58 | ≥12 | 233 | 27.67 | ||
≥60 | 40 | 4.75 | 经营时间 Operation time/a | 0~<5 | 287 | 34.09 | |
性别Gender | 男Male | 676 | 80.29 | 5~<12 | 463 | 54.99 | |
女Female | 166 | 19.71 | ≥12 | 92 | 10.93 | ||
农场主受教育程度 Educational attainment | 小学及以下 Primary shool or below | 20 | 2.38 | 农场类型 Farm type | 种植业Planting | 326 | 38.72 |
初中Junior middle school | 204 | 24.23 | 养殖业Breeding | 107 | 12.71 | ||
高中Seniro middle school | 321 | 38.12 | 种养结合业 Combination of planting and breeding | 409 | 48.57 | ||
大专及以上 Junior college or above | 297 | 35.27 | |||||
管理经验 Whether to have management experience | 是Yes | 483 | 57.36 | 是否绿色先行示范 Whether to take green demonstration | 是Yes | 529 | 62.83 |
否No | 359 | 42.64 | 否No | 313 | 37.17 | ||
家庭人口数量 Number of family members | 0~<4 | 263 | 31.24 | 农场生产经营收入 Operating income of farm/(104 yuan) | 0~<20 | 216 | 25.65 |
4~<7 | 494 | 58.67 | 20~<50 | 188 | 22.33 | ||
50~<100 | 214 | 25.42 | |||||
≥7 | 85 | 10.10 | ≥150 | 224 | 26.60 | ||
是否有村干部 Is there village cadre in family | 是Yes | 312 | 37.05 | 是否购买农业保险 Whether to take agricultural insurance | 是Yes | 591 | 70.19 |
否No | 530 | 62.95 | 否No | 251 | 29.81 |
Table 1 Basic characteristics of the surveyed family farms
分组变量 Grouping variables | 样本量 Sample size | 比例 Percent- age/% | 分组变量 Grouping variables | 样本量 Sample size | 比例 Percent- age/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄Age | 0~<40 | 194 | 23.04 | 农场劳动人数 Number of workers | 0~<5 | 196 | 23.28 |
40~<50 | 300 | 35.63 | 5~<12 | 413 | 49.05 | ||
50~<60 | 308 | 36.58 | ≥12 | 233 | 27.67 | ||
≥60 | 40 | 4.75 | 经营时间 Operation time/a | 0~<5 | 287 | 34.09 | |
性别Gender | 男Male | 676 | 80.29 | 5~<12 | 463 | 54.99 | |
女Female | 166 | 19.71 | ≥12 | 92 | 10.93 | ||
农场主受教育程度 Educational attainment | 小学及以下 Primary shool or below | 20 | 2.38 | 农场类型 Farm type | 种植业Planting | 326 | 38.72 |
初中Junior middle school | 204 | 24.23 | 养殖业Breeding | 107 | 12.71 | ||
高中Seniro middle school | 321 | 38.12 | 种养结合业 Combination of planting and breeding | 409 | 48.57 | ||
大专及以上 Junior college or above | 297 | 35.27 | |||||
管理经验 Whether to have management experience | 是Yes | 483 | 57.36 | 是否绿色先行示范 Whether to take green demonstration | 是Yes | 529 | 62.83 |
否No | 359 | 42.64 | 否No | 313 | 37.17 | ||
家庭人口数量 Number of family members | 0~<4 | 263 | 31.24 | 农场生产经营收入 Operating income of farm/(104 yuan) | 0~<20 | 216 | 25.65 |
4~<7 | 494 | 58.67 | 20~<50 | 188 | 22.33 | ||
50~<100 | 214 | 25.42 | |||||
≥7 | 85 | 10.10 | ≥150 | 224 | 26.60 | ||
是否有村干部 Is there village cadre in family | 是Yes | 312 | 37.05 | 是否购买农业保险 Whether to take agricultural insurance | 是Yes | 591 | 70.19 |
否No | 530 | 62.95 | 否No | 251 | 29.81 |
类型 Type | 变量名称 Variable name | 变量符号 Varible symbol | 变量定义(赋值)与计算方法 Definitions (assignment) and calculation method | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
被解释变量 Dependent variable | 绿色生产技术采纳程度 Adoption of green production technology | G | 用变异系数法计算得出 Calculated by coefficient of variation | 58.02 | 29.864 |
解释变量 Independent variable | 融资约束 Financing constraints | F | SA指数的绝对值 Absolute value of SA index | 2.03 | 0.595 |
调节变量 Adjust variable | 绿色补贴 Green subsidies | B | 近3 a是否收到过绿色补贴:是=1,否=0 Have you received green subsidy in the past three years: Yes=1, No=0 | 0.318 | 0.466 |
控制变量 Control variables | 农场主年龄 Age | C11 | 受访时农场主的年龄 Age of farmer when interviewed | 46.223 | 8.654 |
农场主性别Gender | C12 | 0=女,1=男0=Female, 1=Male | 0.803 | 0.398 | |
农场主受教育程度 Educational attainment | C13 | 1=小学及以下,2=初中,3=高中,4=大专及以上 1=Primary school or below, 2=Junior middle school, 3=Senior middle school, 4=Junior college or above | 3.063 | 0.829 | |
农场主是否曾从事过 管理工作 Management experience | C14 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.574 | 0.495 | |
家庭人口数 Number of family members | C21 | 农场主家庭总人口数 The total number of farmer households | 4.582 | 2.207 | |
农场劳动力人数 Number of workers | C22 | 农场注册登记的劳动人数 The number of workers registered in the farm | 12.887 | 29.874 | |
家庭中是否有村干部 Is there village cadre in family | C23 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.371 | 0.483 | |
经营时间Operation time | C31 | 农场的实际经营年限The operation time of the farm | 6.575 | 4.454 | |
农场类型 Farm type | C32 | 1=种植业,2=养殖业,3=种养结合 1=Planting, 2=Breeding, 3=Combination of planting and breeding | 2.099 | 0.93 | |
是否开展农业绿色先行 示范 Whether to take green demonstration | C33 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.628 | 0.484 | |
是否购买农业保险 Whether to take agricultural insurance | C34 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.702 | 0.458 | |
农场生产经营收入 Operating income of farm | C35 | 2021年农场全年的生产性经营总收入 Total operating income of the farm in 2021/(104yuan) | 137.376 | 196.295 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistics of variables
类型 Type | 变量名称 Variable name | 变量符号 Varible symbol | 变量定义(赋值)与计算方法 Definitions (assignment) and calculation method | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
被解释变量 Dependent variable | 绿色生产技术采纳程度 Adoption of green production technology | G | 用变异系数法计算得出 Calculated by coefficient of variation | 58.02 | 29.864 |
解释变量 Independent variable | 融资约束 Financing constraints | F | SA指数的绝对值 Absolute value of SA index | 2.03 | 0.595 |
调节变量 Adjust variable | 绿色补贴 Green subsidies | B | 近3 a是否收到过绿色补贴:是=1,否=0 Have you received green subsidy in the past three years: Yes=1, No=0 | 0.318 | 0.466 |
控制变量 Control variables | 农场主年龄 Age | C11 | 受访时农场主的年龄 Age of farmer when interviewed | 46.223 | 8.654 |
农场主性别Gender | C12 | 0=女,1=男0=Female, 1=Male | 0.803 | 0.398 | |
农场主受教育程度 Educational attainment | C13 | 1=小学及以下,2=初中,3=高中,4=大专及以上 1=Primary school or below, 2=Junior middle school, 3=Senior middle school, 4=Junior college or above | 3.063 | 0.829 | |
农场主是否曾从事过 管理工作 Management experience | C14 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.574 | 0.495 | |
家庭人口数 Number of family members | C21 | 农场主家庭总人口数 The total number of farmer households | 4.582 | 2.207 | |
农场劳动力人数 Number of workers | C22 | 农场注册登记的劳动人数 The number of workers registered in the farm | 12.887 | 29.874 | |
家庭中是否有村干部 Is there village cadre in family | C23 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.371 | 0.483 | |
经营时间Operation time | C31 | 农场的实际经营年限The operation time of the farm | 6.575 | 4.454 | |
农场类型 Farm type | C32 | 1=种植业,2=养殖业,3=种养结合 1=Planting, 2=Breeding, 3=Combination of planting and breeding | 2.099 | 0.93 | |
是否开展农业绿色先行 示范 Whether to take green demonstration | C33 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.628 | 0.484 | |
是否购买农业保险 Whether to take agricultural insurance | C34 | 是=1,否=0 Yes=1, No=0 | 0.702 | 0.458 | |
农场生产经营收入 Operating income of farm | C35 | 2021年农场全年的生产性经营总收入 Total operating income of the farm in 2021/(104yuan) | 137.376 | 196.295 |
变量 Variable | 回归1 Regreesion 1 | 回归2 Regreesion 2 | 回归3 Regreesion 3 |
---|---|---|---|
F | -11.070*** | -10.240*** | -7.975*** |
(1.689) | (1.745) | (1.814) | |
C11 | — | 0.140 | 0.117 |
(0.127) | (0.123) | ||
C12 | — | -3.750 | -4.014* |
(2.528) | (2.435) | ||
C13 | — | 0.989 | 1.138 |
(1.374) | (1.333) | ||
C14 | — | 3.777* | 2.601 |
(2.088) | (2.022) | ||
C21 | — | 0.961** | 0.914** |
(0.457) | (0.442) | ||
C22 | — | 0.027 1 | 0.033 6 |
(0.033 8) | (0.032 6) | ||
C23 | — | 3.273 | 3.111 |
(2.143) | (2.073) | ||
C31 | — | — | 0.338 |
(0.225) | |||
C32 | — | — | 3.909*** |
(1.089) | |||
C33 | — | — | 14.35*** |
(2.046) | |||
C34 | — | — | 4.396** |
(2.218) | |||
C35 | — | — | -0.272 |
(0.599) | |||
常数项Constant | 80.48*** | 63.89*** | -635.1 |
(3.573) | (10.60) | (456.2) | |
R2 | 0.049 | 0.092 | 0.163 |
Table 3 Basic regression results
变量 Variable | 回归1 Regreesion 1 | 回归2 Regreesion 2 | 回归3 Regreesion 3 |
---|---|---|---|
F | -11.070*** | -10.240*** | -7.975*** |
(1.689) | (1.745) | (1.814) | |
C11 | — | 0.140 | 0.117 |
(0.127) | (0.123) | ||
C12 | — | -3.750 | -4.014* |
(2.528) | (2.435) | ||
C13 | — | 0.989 | 1.138 |
(1.374) | (1.333) | ||
C14 | — | 3.777* | 2.601 |
(2.088) | (2.022) | ||
C21 | — | 0.961** | 0.914** |
(0.457) | (0.442) | ||
C22 | — | 0.027 1 | 0.033 6 |
(0.033 8) | (0.032 6) | ||
C23 | — | 3.273 | 3.111 |
(2.143) | (2.073) | ||
C31 | — | — | 0.338 |
(0.225) | |||
C32 | — | — | 3.909*** |
(1.089) | |||
C33 | — | — | 14.35*** |
(2.046) | |||
C34 | — | — | 4.396** |
(2.218) | |||
C35 | — | — | -0.272 |
(0.599) | |||
常数项Constant | 80.48*** | 63.89*** | -635.1 |
(3.573) | (10.60) | (456.2) | |
R2 | 0.049 | 0.092 | 0.163 |
变量 Variable | 回归4 Regreesion 4 | 回归5 Regreesion 5 | 回归6 Regreesion 6 |
---|---|---|---|
F | -13.95*** | -10.13*** | -0.497*** |
(1.225) | (2.033) | (0.119) | |
常数项Constant | -895.9** | 68.38*** | — |
(418.5) | (14.77) | — | |
R2 | 0.260 | 0.164 | — |
pseudo R2 | — | — | 0.051 6 |
Table 4 Robustness test result by replacing independent or dependent variables
变量 Variable | 回归4 Regreesion 4 | 回归5 Regreesion 5 | 回归6 Regreesion 6 |
---|---|---|---|
F | -13.95*** | -10.13*** | -0.497*** |
(1.225) | (2.033) | (0.119) | |
常数项Constant | -895.9** | 68.38*** | — |
(418.5) | (14.77) | — | |
R2 | 0.260 | 0.164 | — |
pseudo R2 | — | — | 0.051 6 |
变量 Varibale | 回归7 Regreesion 7 | 回归8 Regreesion 8 | 回归9 Regreesion 9 | 回归10 Regreesion 10 | 回归11 Regreesion 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | -0.072** (0.139) | -0.100*** (0.213) | -0.046 (0.138) | -0.079** (0.150) | -0.120*** (0.148) |
常数项 | -1.136 | 2.900* | -1.240 | 2.445** | -0.564 |
Constant | (1.021) | (1.627) | (1.008) | (1.143) | (1.066) |
Prob>chi2 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
pseudo R2 | 0.074 | 0.103 | 0.043 | 0.070 | 0.141 |
Table 5 Heterogeneity of financing constraints on the adoption of green production technologies
变量 Varibale | 回归7 Regreesion 7 | 回归8 Regreesion 8 | 回归9 Regreesion 9 | 回归10 Regreesion 10 | 回归11 Regreesion 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | -0.072** (0.139) | -0.100*** (0.213) | -0.046 (0.138) | -0.079** (0.150) | -0.120*** (0.148) |
常数项 | -1.136 | 2.900* | -1.240 | 2.445** | -0.564 |
Constant | (1.021) | (1.627) | (1.008) | (1.143) | (1.066) |
Prob>chi2 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
pseudo R2 | 0.074 | 0.103 | 0.043 | 0.070 | 0.141 |
变量 Variable | 回归12 Regression 12 | 回归13 Regression 13 |
---|---|---|
F | -6.854** | -9.359*** |
(2.946) | (2.452) | |
常数项 | -660.2 | -302.9 |
Constant | (748.9) | (592.7) |
R2 | 0.131 | 0.137 |
Table 6 Heterogeneity of farms with or without green technology demonstration
变量 Variable | 回归12 Regression 12 | 回归13 Regression 13 |
---|---|---|
F | -6.854** | -9.359*** |
(2.946) | (2.452) | |
常数项 | -660.2 | -302.9 |
Constant | (748.9) | (592.7) |
R2 | 0.131 | 0.137 |
变量 Variable | 回归14 Regression 14 | 回归15 Regression 15 | 回归16 Regression 16 | 回归17 Regression 17 | 回归18 Regression 18 | 回归19 Regression 19 | 回归20 Regression 20 | 回归21 Regression 21 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | -7.668*** | -8.115*** | -11.28*** | -8.326*** | -10.330*** | -4.401 | -10.120*** | -8.266** |
(2.459) | (2.962) | (3.028) | (2.381) | (2.208) | (3.010) | (2.380) | (3.520) | |
R2 | 0.145 | 0.130 | 0.164 | 0.144 | 0.112 | 0.162 | 0.147 | 0.096 |
Table 7 Heterogeneity in adoption of green production technologies of farms with different endowments
变量 Variable | 回归14 Regression 14 | 回归15 Regression 15 | 回归16 Regression 16 | 回归17 Regression 17 | 回归18 Regression 18 | 回归19 Regression 19 | 回归20 Regression 20 | 回归21 Regression 21 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | -7.668*** | -8.115*** | -11.28*** | -8.326*** | -10.330*** | -4.401 | -10.120*** | -8.266** |
(2.459) | (2.962) | (3.028) | (2.381) | (2.208) | (3.010) | (2.380) | (3.520) | |
R2 | 0.145 | 0.130 | 0.164 | 0.144 | 0.112 | 0.162 | 0.147 | 0.096 |
变量 Variable | 回归22 Regression 22 | 回归23 Regression 23 |
---|---|---|
F | -8.058*** | -0.517*** |
(1.807) | (0.120) | |
B | 4.388** | 0.276* |
(2.171) | (0.144) | |
F×B | -6.928** | -0.511** |
(3.461) | (0.233) | |
常数项Constant | 842 | 842 |
R2 | 0.171 | — |
pseudo R2 | — | 0.054 8 |
Table 8 Moderating effect of green subsidies
变量 Variable | 回归22 Regression 22 | 回归23 Regression 23 |
---|---|---|
F | -8.058*** | -0.517*** |
(1.807) | (0.120) | |
B | 4.388** | 0.276* |
(2.171) | (0.144) | |
F×B | -6.928** | -0.511** |
(3.461) | (0.233) | |
常数项Constant | 842 | 842 |
R2 | 0.171 | — |
pseudo R2 | — | 0.054 8 |
[1] | 于法稳. 新时代农业绿色发展动因、核心及对策研究[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(5): 19-34. |
YU F W. An analysis of the reasons, core and countermeasures of agricultural green development in the new era[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(5): 19-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 刘迪, 等. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素: 对高意愿低行为的现象解释[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(3): 632-641. |
HUANG Y Z, LUO X F, LIU D, et al. Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of organic fertilizer instead of chemical fertilizer: explaining the phenomenon of farmers’ little behavior with strong willingness[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(3): 632-641. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 张林秀, 白云丽, 孙明星, 等. 从系统科学视角探讨农业生产绿色转型[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(10): 42-50. |
ZHANG L X, BAI Y L, SUN M X, et al. Views on agricultural green production from the perspective of system science[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(10): 42-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 刘美玉, 黄速建. 信贷约束强度与农村企业绩效水平: 基于广义倾向得分方法的经验分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(12): 105-123. |
LIU M Y, HUANG S J. The credit constraint intensity and performance level of rural enterprises: an empirical analysis based on a generalized propensity score method[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(12): 105-123. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 李昊, 曹辰, 李林哲. 绿色认知能促进农户绿色生产行为吗? : 基于社会规范锁定效应的分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(9): 18-25. |
LI H, CAO C, LI L Z. Can green cognition promote farmers’ green production behavior?: analysis of lock-in effect based on social norms[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(9): 18-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 杨滨键, 尚杰, 于法稳. 农业面源污染防治的难点、问题及对策[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(2): 236-245. |
YANG B J, SHANG J, YU F W. Difficulty, problems and countermeasures of agricultural non-point sources pollution control in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(2): 236-245. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 程恩江, 刘西川. 小额信贷缓解农户正规信贷配给了吗?: 来自三个非政府小额信贷项目区的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2010(12): 190-206. |
CHENG E J, LIU X C. Can microfinance alleviate the formal credit rationing facing rural households?: evidences from three microfinance pilot project areas in China[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2010(12): 190-206. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 徐攀. 农业经营主体融资担保协同机制与效应: 浙江省农担体系建设的探索与实践[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(10): 113-126. |
XU P. Synergetic mechanism and effects of financing guarantee on agricultural operating entities: an explorative and practical perspective from Zhejiang agricultural credit guarantee[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(10): 113-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 邹杰玲, 董政祎, 王玉斌. “同途殊归”: 劳动力外出务工对农户采用可持续农业技术的影响[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(8): 83-98. |
ZOU J L, DONG Z Y, WANG Y B. The effects of labor migration on farmers’ sustainable agricultural technology adoption decisions[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(8): 83-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 畅倩, 颜俨, 李晓平, 等. 为何“说一套做一套”: 农户生态生产意愿与行为的悖离研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(4): 85-97. |
CHANG Q, YAN Y, LI X P, et al. Why “say one thing and do another”?: a study on the deviation of willingness and behavior of farmers’ ecological production[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(4): 85-97. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 魏昊. 信贷双重约束对农业经营主体绿色生产行为影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021. |
WEI H. Study on the impact of double credit constraints on green production behavior of agricultural operators[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | YU C H, WU X Q, ZHANG D Y, et al. Demand for green finance: resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2021, 153: 112255. |
[13] | 韩朝华. 个体农户和农业规模化经营: 家庭农场理论评述[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(7): 184-199. |
HAN C H. Individual farmers and scale farming: reviews of the theoretics of the family farm[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(7): 184-199. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 杜志雄, 金书秦. 中国农业政策新目标的形成与实现[J]. 东岳论丛, 2016, 37(2): 24-29. |
DU Z X, JIN S Q. The formation and realization of the new goal of China’s agricultural policy[J]. Dongyue Tribune, 2016, 37(2): 24-29. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 蔡颖萍, 杜志雄. 家庭农场生产行为的生态自觉性及其影响因素分析: 基于全国家庭农场监测数据的实证检验[J]. 中国农村经济, 2016(12): 33-45. |
CAI Y P, DU Z X. Ecological consciousness of family farms’ production behavior and its influencing factors: an empirical test based on the monitoring data of family farms in China[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2016(12): 33-45. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | LU Y C, GAO Y Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Can the green finance policy force the green transformation of high-polluting enterprises?: a quasi-natural experiment based on “Green Credit Guidelines”[J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 114: 106265. |
[17] | GAO Y, LIU B, YU L L, et al. Social capital, land tenure and the adoption of green control techniques by family farms: evidence from Shandong and Henan Provinces of China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 89: 104250. |
[18] | NIU Z H, CHEN C, GAO Y, et al. Peer effects, attention allocation and farmers’ adoption of cleaner production technology: taking green control techniques as an example[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 339: 130700. |
[19] | 陈军, 帅朗. 新型农业经营主体供给型融资约束与融资担保: 基于湖北省的数据考察[J]. 农村经济, 2021(2): 95-104. |
CHEN J, SHUAI L. Supply-based financing constraints and financing guarantees for new agricultural operators: based on data from Hubei Province[J]. Rural Economy, 2021(2): 95-104. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 李守伟, 李光超, 李备友. 农业污染背景下农业补贴政策的作用机理与效应分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(2): 97-105. |
LI S W, LI G C, LI B Y. Analysis on impact mechanism and effects of agricultural subsidy policies under the background of agricultural pollution[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(2): 97-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | RUTTAN V W. Induced innovation and path dependence: a reassessment with respect to agricultural development and the environment[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1996, 53(1): 41-59. |
[22] | 杨福霞, 郑欣. 价值感知视角下生态补偿方式对农户绿色生产行为的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(4): 164-171. |
YANG F X, ZHENG X. Impact of ecological compensation methods on farmers’ green production behaviors from the perspective of value perception[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(4): 164-171. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 郑旭媛, 徐志刚. 资源禀赋约束、要素替代与诱致性技术变迁: 以中国粮食生产的机械化为例[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017, 16(1): 45-66. |
ZHENG X Y, XU Z G. Endowment restriction, factor substitution and induced technological innovation: a case research on the grain producing mechanization in China[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2017, 16(1): 45-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 林黎, 李敬, 肖波. 农户绿色生产技术采纳意愿决定:市场驱动还是政府推动?[J]. 经济问题, 2021(12): 67-74. |
LIN L, LI J, XIAO B. What factors determine farmers’ willingness to adopt green production technology: market or government?[J]. On Economic Problems, 2021(12): 67-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | NIKOLOV B, SCHMID L, STERI R. The sources of financing constraints[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 139(2): 478-501. |
[26] | 黄卓, 王萍萍. 数字普惠金融在数字农业发展中的作用[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022, 43(5): 27-36. |
HUANG Z, WANG P P. The role of digital financial inclusion in the development of digital agriculture[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022, 43(5): 27-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | O’TOOLE C, HENNESSY T. Do decoupled payments affect investment financing constraints?: evidence from Irish agriculture[J]. Food Policy, 2015, 56: 67-75. |
[28] | 任曙明, 吕镯. 融资约束、政府补贴与全要素生产率: 来自中国装备制造企业的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(11): 10-23, 187. |
REN S M, LV Z. The financial constraints, the government subsidies and the factor productivity: a case study on the equipment-manufacturing enterprises in China[J]. Management World, 2014(11): 10-23, 187. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | WANG T, LIU X X, WANG H. Green bonds, financing constraints, and green innovation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 381: 135134. |
[30] | YU L, ZHANG B B, YAN Z J, et al. How do financing constraints enhance pollutant emissions intensity at enterprises?: evidence from microscopic data at the enterprise level in China[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2022, 96: 106811. |
[31] | DEMIRGUC-KUNT A, MAKSIMOVIC V. Law, finance and firm growth[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1998, 53(6): 2107-2137. |
[32] | 徐志刚, 张骏逸, 吕开宇. 经营规模、地权期限与跨期农业技术采用: 以秸秆直接还田为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(3): 61-74. |
XU Z G, ZHANG J Y, LV K Y. The scale of operation, term of land ownership and the adoption of inter-temporal agricultural technology: an example of “straw return to soil directly”[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(3): 61-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 李家辉, 陆迁. 数字金融对农户采用绿色生产技术的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(12): 2470-2486. |
LI J H, LU Q. The impact of digital finance on farmers’ adoption of green production technologies[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(12): 2470-2486. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | GUO L L, LI H J, CAO X X, et al. Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 299: 113621. |
[35] | SCHOLZ R W, GEISSLER B. Feebates for dealing with trade-offs on fertilizer subsidies: a conceptual framework for environmental management[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 189: 898-909. |
[36] | JU X T, GU B J, WU Y Y, et al. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016, 41: 26-32. |
[37] | 左喆瑜, 付志虎. 绿色农业补贴政策的环境效应和经济效应: 基于世行贷款农业面源污染治理项目的断点回归设计[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(2): 106-121. |
ZUO Z Y, FU Z H. The environmental and economic effects of green agricultural subsidy policies: a regression of discontinuity design based on agricultural non-point source pollution control programs with the World Bank’s loan in Guangdong Province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2021(2): 106-121. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 高天志, 冯辉, 陆迁. 数字农技推广服务促进了农户绿色生产技术选择吗: 基于黄河流域3省微观调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2023(9): 23-38. |
GAO T Z, FENG H, LU Q. Can digital agricultural extension services promote farmers’ green production technology choices: based on micro-survey data from three provinces in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2023(9): 23-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 杨志海. 老龄化、社会网络与农户绿色生产技术采纳行为: 来自长江流域六省农户数据的验证[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(4): 44-58. |
YANG Z H. Ageing, social network and the adoption of green production technology: evidence from farm households in six provinces in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. China Rural Survey, 2018(4): 44-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 李晓静, 陈哲, 刘斐, 等. 参与电商会促进猕猴桃种植户绿色生产技术采纳吗?: 基于倾向得分匹配的反事实估计[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(3): 118-135. |
LI X J, CHEN Z, LIU F, et al. Does participating in E-commerce promote the adoption of green production technologies by kiwifruit growers?: a counterfactual estimation based on propensity score matching method[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020(3): 118-135. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 宋彦蓉, 张宝元. 基于地区现代化评价的客观赋权法比较[J]. 统计与决策, 2015, 31(11): 82-86. |
SONG Y R, ZHANG B Y. Comparison of objective weighting methods based on regional modernization evaluation[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2015, 31(11): 82-86. (in Chinese) | |
[42] | HADLOCK C J, PIERCE J R. New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(5): 1909-1940. |
[43] | 蒋军成, 赵广攀. 乡村产业振兴视野下我国内陆地区新三板农企融资质量提升研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2023(5): 87-95. |
JIANG J C, ZHAO G P. Improvement of the financing quality of rural enterprises in the new third board of China’s inland areas under the rural industry revitalization[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2023(5): 87-95. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[44] | 鞠晓生, 卢荻, 虞义华. 融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(1): 4-16. |
JU X S, LO D, YU Y H. Financing constraints, working capital management and the persistence of firm innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 48(1): 4-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[45] | 赵昶, 孔祥智, 仇焕广. 农业经营规模扩大有助于化肥减量吗: 基于全国1 274个家庭农场的计量分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(4): 110-121. |
ZHAO C, KONG X Z, QIU H G. Does the expansion of farm size contribute to the reduction of chemical fertilizers?: empirical analysis based on 1 274 family farms in China[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(4): 110-121. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[46] | 王建华, 周瑾. 农业绿色生产转型的内在动力: 基于微观主体实践与外部结构性因素的影响分析[J]. 农村经济, 2022(12): 67-77. |
WANG J H, ZHOU J. The internal motive force of the transformation of agricultural green production: based on the analysis of the influence of micro-subject practice and external structural factors[J]. Rural Economy, 2022(12): 67-77. (in Chinese) | |
[47] | 郭田雨, 周宏. 家庭农场对绿色生产的影响: 以江苏省三市水稻种植户为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(8): 216-222. |
GUO T Y, ZHOU H. Impact of family farms on green production: taking rice growers in three cities of Jiangsu Province as an example[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(8): 216-222. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | LUO Limin, QIU Fei, SONG Lili, LIU Qiang, SHEN Xi. Research on the cultivation path and countermeasures of modern family farm management talents: taking Zhejiang Province as an example [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1686-1693. |
[2] | YU Yin\|quan,WANG Shu\|jin. The choice of cooperation mechanism between leading enterprises and family farms: The empirical analysis based on the enterprise level [J]. , 2015, 27(7): 1259-. |
[3] | ZHANG Xia. Financial support in development of family farms in Zhejiang Province: present situation, problems and countermeasures#br# [J]. , 2015, 27(6): 1096-. |
[4] | LI Shuang\|peng1, CHEN Yong\|fu2,*. Research of legal attribute of family farm [J]. , 2014, 26(5): 1368-. |
[5] | HUANG Yan-ting;CUI Rui*. Causes of long-term existence of family farm [J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1146. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 171
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 69
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||