Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 2376-2386.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20241129
• Biosystems Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Jinhao1(
), JIANG Jie2,3,*(
), LIU Hang1, LI Fuqiang1
Received:2024-12-30
Online:2025-11-25
Published:2025-12-08
CLC Number:
YANG Jinhao, JIANG Jie, LIU Hang, LI Fuqiang. Calibration of rice seed parameters and simulation of dry direct-seeding based on the discrete element method[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(11): 2376-2386.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20241129
| 尺寸 Size | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 长Length | 9.72 | 8.44 | 9.18 |
| 宽Width | 2.90 | 2.46 | 2.66 |
| 厚Thickness | 2.24 | 1.70 | 2.00 |
Table 1 Triaxial size of rice seeds mm
| 尺寸 Size | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 长Length | 9.72 | 8.44 | 9.18 |
| 宽Width | 2.90 | 2.46 | 2.66 |
| 厚Thickness | 2.24 | 1.70 | 2.00 |
Fig.3 Test bench for coefficient of static friction 1 is the inclinometer; 2 is the rice seed; 3 is the nylon plate; θ is the angle of the inclinometer when the rice seed slides.
Fig.4 Rolling friction factor test bench 1 is the inclinometer; 2 is the nylon plate; 3 is the rice seed ball. Y denotes the initial height of the rice seed ball; X indicates the displacement of the rice seed ball rolling on the inclined plate; L represents the displacement of the rice seed ball rolling on the flat plate; β denotes the inclination angle of the inclined plate, (°).
| 序号 No. | 左侧角度 Left side angle/(°) | 右侧角度 Right side angle/(°) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.28 | 32.17 |
| 2 | 32.52 | 32.65 |
| 3 | 31.84 | 31.45 |
| 4 | 31.52 | 32.58 |
| 5 | 32.24 | 32.92 |
| 6 | 32.16 | 29.91 |
| 7 | 32.00 | 31.70 |
| 8 | 30.84 | 32.48 |
| 9 | 32.63 | 32.26 |
| 10 | 31.23 | 31.70 |
| 平均Average | 31.93 | 31.98 |
Table 2 Stacking angle table
| 序号 No. | 左侧角度 Left side angle/(°) | 右侧角度 Right side angle/(°) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.28 | 32.17 |
| 2 | 32.52 | 32.65 |
| 3 | 31.84 | 31.45 |
| 4 | 31.52 | 32.58 |
| 5 | 32.24 | 32.92 |
| 6 | 32.16 | 29.91 |
| 7 | 32.00 | 31.70 |
| 8 | 30.84 | 32.48 |
| 9 | 32.63 | 32.26 |
| 10 | 31.23 | 31.70 |
| 平均Average | 31.93 | 31.98 |
| 参数 Parameter | 低水平(-1) Low(-1) | 高水平(+1) High(+1) |
|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.30 | 0.80 |
| X2 | 0.25 | 0.80 |
| X3 | 0.30 | 0.13 |
| X4 | 0.30 | 0.60 |
| X5 | 0.30 | 0.75 |
| X6 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
Table 3 Plackett-Burman test parameters
| 参数 Parameter | 低水平(-1) Low(-1) | 高水平(+1) High(+1) |
|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.30 | 0.80 |
| X2 | 0.25 | 0.80 |
| X3 | 0.30 | 0.13 |
| X4 | 0.30 | 0.60 |
| X5 | 0.30 | 0.75 |
| X6 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| 序号No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 8.16 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 38.21 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 33.24 |
| 4 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 13.26 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1. | -1 | 1 | 27.53 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 17.58 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 40.93 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 21.15 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 37.93 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 19.07 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 26.34 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 14.83 |
Table 4 Plackett-Burman tests and results
| 序号No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 8.16 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 38.21 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 33.24 |
| 4 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 13.26 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1. | -1 | 1 | 27.53 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 17.58 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 40.93 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 21.15 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 37.93 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 19.07 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 26.34 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 14.83 |
| 参数 Parameter | 效应 Effect | 均方和 Sum of square | 影响率 Impact rate/% | 显著性排序 Sgnificant sorting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 2.555 00 | 19.584 10 | 1.475 27 | 5 |
| X2 | 4.911 67 | 72.373 40 | 5.451 91 | 4 |
| X3 | 0.268 333 | 0.216 00 | 0.016 27 | 6 |
| X4 | -5.418 33 | 88.075 00 | 6.634 71 | 3 |
| X5 | 16.228 30 | 790.076 00 | 59.576 70 | 1 |
| X6 | 9.795 00 | 287.826 00 | 21.682 00 | 2 |
Table 5 Significance analysis of Plackett-Burman test parameters
| 参数 Parameter | 效应 Effect | 均方和 Sum of square | 影响率 Impact rate/% | 显著性排序 Sgnificant sorting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 2.555 00 | 19.584 10 | 1.475 27 | 5 |
| X2 | 4.911 67 | 72.373 40 | 5.451 91 | 4 |
| X3 | 0.268 333 | 0.216 00 | 0.016 27 | 6 |
| X4 | -5.418 33 | 88.075 00 | 6.634 71 | 3 |
| X5 | 16.228 30 | 790.076 00 | 59.576 70 | 1 |
| X6 | 9.795 00 | 287.826 00 | 21.682 00 | 2 |
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.65 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 13.17 | 58.79 |
| 2 | 0.55 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 23.34 | 26.95 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 27.21 | 14.85 |
| 4 | 0.35 | 0.70 | 0.08 | 31.71 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 35.18 | 10.09 |
Table 6 Steepest climb test
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.65 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 13.17 | 58.79 |
| 2 | 0.55 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 23.34 | 26.95 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 27.21 | 14.85 |
| 4 | 0.35 | 0.70 | 0.08 | 31.71 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 35.18 | 10.09 |
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ /(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 34.26 | 7.23 |
| 2 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 32.26 | 2.18 |
| 3 | 1 | 0. | 1 | 32.57 | 1.94 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.71 | 5.49 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 31.64 | 0.99 |
| 6 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 34.01 | 6.43 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.14 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 29.57 | 7.46 |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 34.57 | 8.18 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.74 | 2.47 |
| 11 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 31.84 | 0.36 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.51 | 1.39 |
| 13 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 30.06 | 5.93 |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 27.33 | 14.46 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.66 | 0.91 |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 29.98 | 6.17 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.18 | 0.70 |
Table 7 Box-Behnken trial design and results
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ /(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 34.26 | 7.23 |
| 2 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 32.26 | 2.18 |
| 3 | 1 | 0. | 1 | 32.57 | 1.94 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.71 | 5.49 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 31.64 | 0.99 |
| 6 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 34.01 | 6.43 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.14 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 29.57 | 7.46 |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 34.57 | 8.18 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.74 | 2.47 |
| 11 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 31.84 | 0.36 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.51 | 1.39 |
| 13 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 30.06 | 5.93 |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 27.33 | 14.46 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.66 | 0.91 |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 29.98 | 6.17 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.18 | 0.70 |
| 来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 54.510 0 | 9 | 6.060 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4 | 2.700 0 | 1 | 2.700 0 | 0.003 4 |
| X5 | 19.910 0 | 1 | 19.910 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X6 | 26.830 0 | 1 | 26.830 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4X5 | 0.970 2 | 1 | 0.970 2 | 0.035 1 |
| X4X6 | 0.921 6 | 1 | 0.921 6 | 0.038 7 |
| X5X6 | 1.330 0 | 1 | 1.330 0 | 0.018 4 |
| 0.457 1 | 1 | 0.457 1 | 0.116 8 | |
| 0.036 4 | 1 | 0.036 4 | 0.629 1 | |
| 1.420 0 | 1 | 1.420 0 | 0.016 1 | |
| 残差Residual | 1.000 0 | 7 | ||
| 失拟项Lack of fit | 0.055 3 | 3 | 0.078 1 | 0.968 5 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.944 7 | 4 | 0.236 2 | |
| 总和Cor total | 55.510 0 | 16 |
Table 8 Analysis of variance of the Box-Behnken test model
| 来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 54.510 0 | 9 | 6.060 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4 | 2.700 0 | 1 | 2.700 0 | 0.003 4 |
| X5 | 19.910 0 | 1 | 19.910 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X6 | 26.830 0 | 1 | 26.830 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4X5 | 0.970 2 | 1 | 0.970 2 | 0.035 1 |
| X4X6 | 0.921 6 | 1 | 0.921 6 | 0.038 7 |
| X5X6 | 1.330 0 | 1 | 1.330 0 | 0.018 4 |
| 0.457 1 | 1 | 0.457 1 | 0.116 8 | |
| 0.036 4 | 1 | 0.036 4 | 0.629 1 | |
| 1.420 0 | 1 | 1.420 0 | 0.016 1 | |
| 残差Residual | 1.000 0 | 7 | ||
| 失拟项Lack of fit | 0.055 3 | 3 | 0.078 1 | 0.968 5 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.944 7 | 4 | 0.236 2 | |
| 总和Cor total | 55.510 0 | 16 |
| 尺寸 Size/mm | 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | 60 | 68 |
| 90 | 71 | |
| 120 | 74 | |
| 9.7 | 60 | 76 |
| 90 | 81 | |
| 120 | 83 | |
| 1.0 | 60 | 70 |
| 90 | 73 | |
| 120 | 73 |
Table 9 Optimization simulation test of seed trough
| 尺寸 Size/mm | 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | 60 | 68 |
| 90 | 71 | |
| 120 | 74 | |
| 9.7 | 60 | 76 |
| 90 | 81 | |
| 120 | 83 | |
| 1.0 | 60 | 70 |
| 90 | 73 | |
| 120 | 73 |
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/ [(°)·s-1] | 2粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 2-seed holes/% | 合格穴占比 Proportion of qualified holes/% | 6粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 6-seed holes/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 2 | 75 | 23 |
| 90 | 5 | 81 | 15 |
| 110 | 7 | 84 | 9 |
| 120 | 12 | 82 | 6 |
Table 10 Seeding simulation results
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/ [(°)·s-1] | 2粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 2-seed holes/% | 合格穴占比 Proportion of qualified holes/% | 6粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 6-seed holes/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 2 | 75 | 23 |
| 90 | 5 | 81 | 15 |
| 110 | 7 | 84 | 9 |
| 120 | 12 | 82 | 6 |
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% | 刺膜合格率 Puncture pass rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | 83 | 95 |
| 100 | 86 | 93 |
| 110 | 86 | 90 |
Table 11 Results of seed row experiment
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% | 刺膜合格率 Puncture pass rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | 83 | 95 |
| 100 | 86 | 93 |
| 110 | 86 | 90 |
| [1] | 沈国春, 魏旭东, 李宏博, 等. 分析水稻旱播水管技术的优点及应用现状[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, 36(6): 122. |
| SHEN G C, WEI X D, LI H B, et al. The advantages and application status of water pipe technology for dry seeding of rice were analyzed[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2016, 36(6): 122. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 牟家宏, 杨发展, 杨云鹏, 等. 基于流固耦合仿真水稻种子建立与参数标定[J]. 农机化研究, 2022, 44(7): 14-20. |
| MOU J H, YANG F Z, YANG Y P, et al. Building and calibration of parameters of rice seeds for fluid-solid coupling simulation[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2022, 44(7): 14-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | REZVANI F, AZARGOSHASB H, JAMIALAHMADI O, et al. Experimental study and CFD simulation of phenol removal by immobilization of soybean seed coat in a packed-bed bioreactor[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 101: 32-43. |
| [4] | HORABIK J, MOLENDA M. Parameters and contact models for DEM simulations of agricultural granular materials: a review[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2016, 147: 206-225. |
| [5] | 鹿芳媛, 马旭, 谭穗妍, 等. 水稻芽种离散元主要接触参数仿真标定与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(2): 93-99. |
| LU F Y, MA X, TAN S Y, et al. Simulative calibration and experiment on main contact parameters of discrete elements for rice bud seeds[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(2): 93-99. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | GONZÁLEZ-MONTELLANO C, FUENTES J M, AYUGA-TÉLLEZ E, et al. Determination of the mechanical properties of maize grains and olives required for use in DEM simulations[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 111(4): 553-562. |
| [7] | COETZEE C J, ELS D N J. Calibration of discrete element parameters and the modelling of silo discharge and bucket filling[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2009, 65(2): 198-212. |
| [8] | 于庆旭, 刘燕, 陈小兵, 等. 基于离散元的三七种子仿真参数标定与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(2): 123-132. |
| YU Q X, LIU Y, CHEN X B, et al. Calibration and experiment of simulation parameters for Panax notoginseng seeds based on DEM[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(2): 123-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 贾富国, 韩燕龙, 刘扬, 等. 稻谷颗粒物料堆积角模拟预测方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(11): 254-260. |
| JIA F G, HAN Y L, LIU Y, et al. Simulation prediction method of repose angle for rice particle materials[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(11): 254-260. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | MIYAMOTO T, NOGUCHI S, MATSUTOMO S. Numerical simulation and experimental verification for rice using distinct element method[M]//XIAO T, ZHANG L, FEI M. Communications in computer and Information Science, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 472-479. |
| [11] | 刘凡一, 张舰, 李博, 等. 基于堆积试验的小麦离散元参数分析及标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(12): 247-253. |
| LIU F Y, ZHANG J, LI B, et al. Calibration of parameters of wheat required in discrete element method simulation based on repose angle of particle heap[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(12): 247-253. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 陈圣家, 金涛, 李志刚, 等. 复杂应力状态下尼龙66力学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2016, 30(S2): 300-303. |
| CHEN S J, JIN T, LI Z G, et al. Mechanical properties of nylon 66 under complex stress[J]. Materials Reports, 2016, 30(S2): 300-303. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | 任文涛, 董滨, 崔红光, 等. 水稻种子与斜面碰撞后运动规律的试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(7): 103-107. |
| REN W T, DONG B, CUI H G, et al. Experiment on the motion characteristics of rice seeds after collision with different slopes[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(7): 103-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 吴孟宸, 丛锦玲, 闫琴, 等. 花生种子颗粒离散元仿真参数标定与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(23): 30-38. |
| WU M C, CONG J L, YAN Q, et al. Calibration and experiments for discrete element simulation parameters of peanut seed particles[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(23): 30-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 张胜伟, 张瑞雨, 陈天佑, 等. 绿豆种子离散元仿真参数标定与排种试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(3): 71-79. |
| ZHANG S W, ZHANG R Y, CHEN T Y, et al. Calibration of simulation parameters of mung bean seeds using discrete element method and verification of seed-metering test[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(3): 71-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 李大鹏. 气力式藜麦精量排种器离散元分析与性能试验研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020. |
| LI D P. Discrete element analysis and performance test of pneumatic Chenopodium wheat precision metering device[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 郑效帅, 何晓宁, 尚书旗, 等. 油莎豆种子籽粒离散元仿真参数标定与试验[J]. 农机化研究, 2024, 46(2): 172-178. |
| ZHENG X S, HE X N, SHANG S Q, et al. Calibration and experiments for discrete element simulation parameters of Cyperus esculentus seeds[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2024, 46(2): 172-178. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 武涛, 黄伟凤, 陈学深, 等. 考虑颗粒间黏结力的黏性土壤离散元模型参数标定[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 93-98. |
| WU T, HUANG W F, CHEN X S, et al. Calibration of discrete element model parameters for cohesive soil considering the cohesion between particles[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(3): 93-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 赵海楠. 面向窝眼轮式排种器优化的水稻种子建模方法研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2024. |
| ZHAO H N. A study on rice-seed modelling method for optimization of hole-wheel seeding metering device[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2024. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 李辉. 水稻覆膜旱直播技术与装备研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021. |
| LI H. Study on technology and equipment for direct-seeded rice using film mulching in dryland[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 任甲辉, 武涛, 刘庆庭, 等. 蔗段离散元仿真建模方法与参数标定[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 124-132. |
| REN J H, WU T, LIU Q T, et al. Discrete element simulation modeling method and parameter calibration of sugarcane segment[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2022, 43(3): 124-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 刘宏俊, 张文毅, 纪要, 等. 基于离散元法的稻麦周年地区土壤仿真物理参数标定[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(12): 153-159. |
| LIU H J, ZHANG W Y, JI Y, et al. Parameter calibration of soil particles in annual rice-wheat region based on discrete element method[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2020, 41(12): 153-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 李勇. U型腔道式水稻精量穴播排种器设计与试验研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021. |
| LI Y. Design and experimental study of U-shaped cavity-type rice precision hole seeding device[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 刘春波. 水稻螺旋槽式排种器旱直播机设计与试验研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2018. |
| LIU C B. Design and experiment of rice spiral groove type distributor drilling machine for dry land[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 铺膜穴播机作业质量: NY/T 987—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006. |
| [1] | REN Ning, YU Guohong, ZHENG Hang, CHEN Zhidong. Parameter calibration of tea garden soil based on discrete element method [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1353-1359. |
| [2] | XIONG Houquan, JIANG Jie. Discrete element parameter calibration and testing of interaction between yellow lateritic red soil and trenching components [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1400-1412. |
| [3] | KONG De, YE Ziran, TAN Xiangfeng, DAI Mengdi, ZHAO Xianliang, KONG Dedong. Measurement of physical contact parameters and discrete element simulation calibration of lettuce seeds [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 932-942. |
| [4] | GU Kechen, JIANG Junjie, PAN Chenxin, SUN Qisong, YIN Wenjie, HU Junguo. A soil respiration monitoring equipment based on open chamber method [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(9): 2181-2191. |
| [5] | XIN Yapeng, WANG Lin, SHI Yinyan, WANG Xiaochan, WU Changwei, LIU Hui. Numerical simulation and optimization of key structure for centrifugal variable fertilizer spreader [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1452-1461. |
| [6] | LIU Limin, REN Ping, CHEN Jianneng, ZHANG Xueheng. Parameter optimization and field experiment of sugarcane harvester based on crop mechanical properties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1187-1194. |
| [7] | ZHANG Yifan, HE Ruiyin, DUAN Qingfei, XU Yong. Numerical analysis of flow characteristics and structural optimization of bellows based on CFD-DEM [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 191-201. |
| [8] | PENG Caiwang, ZHOU Ting, SUN Songlin, XIE Yelin, WEI Yuan. Calibration of parameters of black soldier fly in discrete method simulation based on response angle of particle heap [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 814-823. |
| [9] | LIU Jun, ZHU Dequan1, YU Congyang, XUE Kang, ZHANG Shun, LIAO Juan. Design and experiment on scoop hole-wheel precision seed-metering device for rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 739-752. |
| [10] | WANG Feng, ZHANG Fengwei, DAI Fei, ZHANG Luhai, ZHAO Wei, YANG Xiaoping. Design and experiment of double layer flat screen type Pinellia ternate harvester [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1946-1955. |
| [11] | LI Weining, BAI Xuanbing, LI Bing. Optimization of structural parameters of drum type tea re-dryer [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 348-358. |
| [12] | LIN Hongyu, QIAN Jing, YAN Lijiao, HUANG Shaorong. Analysis of spatial-temporal pattern and scenario simulation of green infrastructure in Wuyi County based on morphological spatial pattern analysis and CA-Markov model [J]. , 2019, 31(7): 1193-1204. |
| [13] | LI Lili, ZHAO Wuyun, TAN Wensheng, Wang Erhua. Design and experiment of natural gas-diesel dual-fuel engine based on SolidWorks [J]. , 2018, 30(3): 461-469. |
| [14] | RAO Honghui, LUO Shiting, YU Jiajia, ZHANG Liyong, LIU Muhua. Study on simulation analysis of Camellia fruit picking and its bud damage with tooth comb dial knife machine based on ANSYS Workbench [J]. , 2017, 29(12): 2134-2141. |
| [15] | MOU Guo\|liang1,ZHANG Xue\|jun1,2,*,SHI Zeng\|lu1,2. Improved design of circulating dryer based on Fluent [J]. , 2015, 27(4): 684-. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||