Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1571-1581.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.01
• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Hailong1(), WANG Hui1, LEI Jinchao2, CAI Jinyang1,*(
)
Received:
2021-09-22
Online:
2022-08-25
Published:
2022-08-26
Contact:
CAI Jinyang
CLC Number:
YANG Hailong, WANG Hui, LEI Jinchao, CAI Jinyang. Analysis and evaluation of phenotypic diversities of early indica rice germplasm resources in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1571-1581.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.01
编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination | 编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination | 编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination | 编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 嘉育89 Jiayu 89 | 26 | 4093 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-12 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-12 | 51 | 4241 | 76 | 4347 | 甬籼738/C18-63 Yongxian 738/C18-63 | ||
2 | 嘉育938 Jiayu 938 | 27 | 4100 | 浙直/IIG17-56 Zhezhi/IIG17-56 | 52 | 4242 | 77 | 4349 | |||
3 | 嘉育25 Jiayu 25 | 28 | 4112 | 浙直/IIG17-27 Zhezhi/IIG17-27 | 53 | 4246 | C18-4/舜达95 C18-4/Shuanda 95 | 78 | 4353 | ||
4 | 中早39 Zhongzao 39 | 29 | 4115 | 54 | 4256 | C18-4/C18-70 | 79 | 4365 | |||
5 | 中早35 Zhongzao 35 | 30 | 4116 | 浙直/IIG17-54 Zhezhi/IIG17-54 | 55 | 4259 | 80 | 4366 | 甬籼738/C18-63 Yongxian 738/C18-63 | ||
6 | 嘉育293 Jiayu 293 | 31 | 4117 | 56 | 4266 | 嘉育25/IIG17-18 Jiayu 25/IIG17-18 | 81 | 4370 | |||
7 | 甬籼634 Yongxian 634 | 32 | 4119 | 中组21/IIG17-54 Zhongzu 21/IIG17-54 | 57 | 4274 | 嘉育25/C18-11 Jiayu 25/C18-11 | 82 | 4380 | ||
8 | 中组100 Zhongzu 100 | 33 | 4122 | 中组21/C18-24 Zhongzu 21/C18-24 | 58 | 4276 | 83 | 4383 | |||
9 | 中组53 Zhongzu 53 | 34 | 4128 | 59 | 4278 | 嘉育25/金早239 Jiayu 25/Jinzao 239 | 84 | 4387 | 甬籼738/C18-75 Yongxian 738/C18-75 | ||
10 | 中组18 Zhongzu 18 | 35 | 4129 | 中组21/C18-85 Zhongzu 21/C18-85 | 60 | 4279 | 85 | 4400 | 甬籼738/C18-79 Yongxian 738/C18-79 | ||
11 | 4017 | 中组23/G17-20 Zhongzu 23/G17-20 | 36 | 4132 | 61 | 4281 | 嘉育25/C18-32 Jiayu 25/C18-32 | 86 | 4401 | ||
12 | 4018 | 37 | 4153 | 甬籼738/嘉育253 Yongxian 738/Jiayu 253 | 62 | 4292 | 嘉育25/C18-56 Jiayu 25/C18-56 | 87 | 4402 | 绍籼17-20/C18-88 Shaoxian 17-20/C18-88 | |
13 | 4021 | 38 | 4154 | 63 | 4295 | 88 | 4403 | ||||
14 | 4024 | 39 | 4158 | 甬籼738/嘉育64 Yongxian 738/Jiayu 64 | 64 | 4297 | 89 | 4410 | |||
15 | 4026 | 中组23/IIG17-10 Zhongzu 23/IIG17-10 | 40 | 4166 | 甬籼738/C18-70 Yongxian 738/C18-70 | 65 | 4299 | 90 | 4412 | ||
16 | 4028 | 41 | 4194 | C18-4/甬籼738 C18-4/Yongxian 738 | 66 | 4300 | 嘉育25/舜达95 Jiayu 25/Shunda 95 | 91 | 4416 | ||
17 | 4041 | 中组23/IIG17-49 Zhongzu 23/IIG17-49 | 42 | 4192 | 67 | 4303 | 92 | 4417 | 嘉育25/C18-78 Jiayu 25/C18-78 | ||
18 | 4046 | 43 | 4197 | C18-4/IIG17-18 | 68 | 4306 | 嘉育25/C18-70 Jiayu 25/C18-70 | 93 | 4418 | ||
19 | 4054 | 绍籼16-3/G17-3 Shaoxian 16-3/G17-3 | 44 | 4203 | C18-4/C18-11 | 69 | 4309 | 94 | 4420 | ||
20 | 4056 | 45 | 4209 | 70 | 4316 | 95 | 4435 | 嘉育25/温926 Jiayu 25/Wen 926 | |||
21 | 4057 | 绍籼16-3/G17-9 Shaoxian 16-3/G17-9 | 46 | 4221 | C18-4/金早239 C18-4/Jinzao 239 | 71 | 4331 | 甬籼738/C18-58 Yongxian 738/C18-58 | 96 | 4442 | |
22 | 4059 | 绍籼16-3/G17-15 Shaoxian 16-3/G17-15 | 47 | 4223 | C18-4/C18-32 | 72 | 4332 | 97 | 4443 | ||
23 | 4078 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-6 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-6 | 48 | 4225 | 73 | 4337 | 98 | 4446 | C18-10/C18-11 | ||
24 | 4086 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-9 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-9 | 49 | 4233 | C18-4/C18-56 | 74 | 4338 | 99 | 4448 | ||
25 | 4091 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-10 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-10 | 50 | 4237 | 75 | 4342 | 100 | 4472 | C18-10/C18-18 |
Table 1 The names and numbers of the tested early indica rice germplasm resources
编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination | 编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination | 编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination | 编号 Number | 资源 Resource | 组合 Combination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 嘉育89 Jiayu 89 | 26 | 4093 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-12 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-12 | 51 | 4241 | 76 | 4347 | 甬籼738/C18-63 Yongxian 738/C18-63 | ||
2 | 嘉育938 Jiayu 938 | 27 | 4100 | 浙直/IIG17-56 Zhezhi/IIG17-56 | 52 | 4242 | 77 | 4349 | |||
3 | 嘉育25 Jiayu 25 | 28 | 4112 | 浙直/IIG17-27 Zhezhi/IIG17-27 | 53 | 4246 | C18-4/舜达95 C18-4/Shuanda 95 | 78 | 4353 | ||
4 | 中早39 Zhongzao 39 | 29 | 4115 | 54 | 4256 | C18-4/C18-70 | 79 | 4365 | |||
5 | 中早35 Zhongzao 35 | 30 | 4116 | 浙直/IIG17-54 Zhezhi/IIG17-54 | 55 | 4259 | 80 | 4366 | 甬籼738/C18-63 Yongxian 738/C18-63 | ||
6 | 嘉育293 Jiayu 293 | 31 | 4117 | 56 | 4266 | 嘉育25/IIG17-18 Jiayu 25/IIG17-18 | 81 | 4370 | |||
7 | 甬籼634 Yongxian 634 | 32 | 4119 | 中组21/IIG17-54 Zhongzu 21/IIG17-54 | 57 | 4274 | 嘉育25/C18-11 Jiayu 25/C18-11 | 82 | 4380 | ||
8 | 中组100 Zhongzu 100 | 33 | 4122 | 中组21/C18-24 Zhongzu 21/C18-24 | 58 | 4276 | 83 | 4383 | |||
9 | 中组53 Zhongzu 53 | 34 | 4128 | 59 | 4278 | 嘉育25/金早239 Jiayu 25/Jinzao 239 | 84 | 4387 | 甬籼738/C18-75 Yongxian 738/C18-75 | ||
10 | 中组18 Zhongzu 18 | 35 | 4129 | 中组21/C18-85 Zhongzu 21/C18-85 | 60 | 4279 | 85 | 4400 | 甬籼738/C18-79 Yongxian 738/C18-79 | ||
11 | 4017 | 中组23/G17-20 Zhongzu 23/G17-20 | 36 | 4132 | 61 | 4281 | 嘉育25/C18-32 Jiayu 25/C18-32 | 86 | 4401 | ||
12 | 4018 | 37 | 4153 | 甬籼738/嘉育253 Yongxian 738/Jiayu 253 | 62 | 4292 | 嘉育25/C18-56 Jiayu 25/C18-56 | 87 | 4402 | 绍籼17-20/C18-88 Shaoxian 17-20/C18-88 | |
13 | 4021 | 38 | 4154 | 63 | 4295 | 88 | 4403 | ||||
14 | 4024 | 39 | 4158 | 甬籼738/嘉育64 Yongxian 738/Jiayu 64 | 64 | 4297 | 89 | 4410 | |||
15 | 4026 | 中组23/IIG17-10 Zhongzu 23/IIG17-10 | 40 | 4166 | 甬籼738/C18-70 Yongxian 738/C18-70 | 65 | 4299 | 90 | 4412 | ||
16 | 4028 | 41 | 4194 | C18-4/甬籼738 C18-4/Yongxian 738 | 66 | 4300 | 嘉育25/舜达95 Jiayu 25/Shunda 95 | 91 | 4416 | ||
17 | 4041 | 中组23/IIG17-49 Zhongzu 23/IIG17-49 | 42 | 4192 | 67 | 4303 | 92 | 4417 | 嘉育25/C18-78 Jiayu 25/C18-78 | ||
18 | 4046 | 43 | 4197 | C18-4/IIG17-18 | 68 | 4306 | 嘉育25/C18-70 Jiayu 25/C18-70 | 93 | 4418 | ||
19 | 4054 | 绍籼16-3/G17-3 Shaoxian 16-3/G17-3 | 44 | 4203 | C18-4/C18-11 | 69 | 4309 | 94 | 4420 | ||
20 | 4056 | 45 | 4209 | 70 | 4316 | 95 | 4435 | 嘉育25/温926 Jiayu 25/Wen 926 | |||
21 | 4057 | 绍籼16-3/G17-9 Shaoxian 16-3/G17-9 | 46 | 4221 | C18-4/金早239 C18-4/Jinzao 239 | 71 | 4331 | 甬籼738/C18-58 Yongxian 738/C18-58 | 96 | 4442 | |
22 | 4059 | 绍籼16-3/G17-15 Shaoxian 16-3/G17-15 | 47 | 4223 | C18-4/C18-32 | 72 | 4332 | 97 | 4443 | ||
23 | 4078 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-6 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-6 | 48 | 4225 | 73 | 4337 | 98 | 4446 | C18-10/C18-11 | ||
24 | 4086 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-9 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-9 | 49 | 4233 | C18-4/C18-56 | 74 | 4338 | 99 | 4448 | ||
25 | 4091 | 绍籼16-3/IIG17-10 Shaoxian 16-3/IIG17-10 | 50 | 4237 | 75 | 4342 | 100 | 4472 | C18-10/C18-18 |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 变异范围 Variation range | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 方差 Variance | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
生育期 Growth period/d | 111.0~117.0 | 114.43 | 1.10 | 1.21 | 0.96 |
株高 Plant height/cm | 75.00~100.00 | 87.89 | 5.71 | 32.64 | 6.50 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length/cm | 23.33~29.83 | 29.70 | 2.60 | 6.77 | 8.76 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf/cm | 20.75~41.50 | 32.59 | 2.49 | 6.19 | 7.64 |
穗长 Panicle length/cm | 17.6~26.5 | 21.41 | 1.69 | 2.85 | 7.88 |
每穗实粒数 Filled grains per panicle | 84.50~199.50 | 141.31 | 23.31 | 543.18 | 16.49 |
每穗瘪谷数Shriveled grains per panicle | 4.00~49.44 | 23.89 | 9.81 | 96.23 | 41.07 |
结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 73.54~96.00 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0 | 5.66 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | 4~15 | 6.66 | 2.04 | 4.16 | 30.64 |
千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 23.0~29.8 | 26.00 | 1.40 | 1.97 | 5.40 |
单穗重Single spike weight/g | 2.78~8.21 | 4.70 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 19.35 |
谷粒长 Grain length | 0.63~0.89 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 0 | 8.40 |
谷粒宽 Grain width | 0.30~0.43 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0 | 9.03 |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | 1.63~2.83 | 2.30 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 10.41 |
Table 2 Analysis of phenotypic genetic variation of early indica rice germplasm in Zhejiang Province
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 变异范围 Variation range | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 方差 Variance | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
生育期 Growth period/d | 111.0~117.0 | 114.43 | 1.10 | 1.21 | 0.96 |
株高 Plant height/cm | 75.00~100.00 | 87.89 | 5.71 | 32.64 | 6.50 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length/cm | 23.33~29.83 | 29.70 | 2.60 | 6.77 | 8.76 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf/cm | 20.75~41.50 | 32.59 | 2.49 | 6.19 | 7.64 |
穗长 Panicle length/cm | 17.6~26.5 | 21.41 | 1.69 | 2.85 | 7.88 |
每穗实粒数 Filled grains per panicle | 84.50~199.50 | 141.31 | 23.31 | 543.18 | 16.49 |
每穗瘪谷数Shriveled grains per panicle | 4.00~49.44 | 23.89 | 9.81 | 96.23 | 41.07 |
结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 73.54~96.00 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0 | 5.66 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | 4~15 | 6.66 | 2.04 | 4.16 | 30.64 |
千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 23.0~29.8 | 26.00 | 1.40 | 1.97 | 5.40 |
单穗重Single spike weight/g | 2.78~8.21 | 4.70 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 19.35 |
谷粒长 Grain length | 0.63~0.89 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 0 | 8.40 |
谷粒宽 Grain width | 0.30~0.43 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0 | 9.03 |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | 1.63~2.83 | 2.30 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 10.41 |
Fig.1 The diversity index of 14 phenotypic characters of early indica rice germplasm in Zhejiang Province C1, Growth period; C2, Plant height; C3, Flag leaf length; C4, Length of second leaf; C5, Panicle length; C6, Filled grains per panicle; C7, Shriveled grains per panicle; C8, Seed setting rate; C9, Effective panicle per plant; C10, 1 000-grain weight; C11, Single spike weight; C12, Grain length; C13, Grain width; C14, Grain width.
项目 Item | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生育期 Growth period | 0.12 | -0.16 | 0.10 | 0.45 | -0.19 | 0.48 | 0.15 | -0.10 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
株高 Plant height | -0.17 | 0.28 | -0.12 | -0.04 | 0.57 | -0.16 | -0.19 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.43 | -0.21 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.00 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length | 0.09 | 0.24 | -0.23 | 0.35 | -0.27 | -0.47 | 0.28 | 0.18 | -0.33 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.05 | -0.01 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf | 0.13 | 0.26 | -0.24 | 0.47 | -0.07 | -0.22 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.39 | -0.62 | -0.18 | -0.05 | -0.10 | 0.00 |
穗长 Panicle length | -0.06 | -0.06 | -0.07 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.28 | -0.38 | -0.15 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
每穗实粒数 Filled grains per panicle | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.06 | -0.04 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.05 | -0.46 | 0.01 | -0.03 | 0.15 | -0.06 | 0.45 | -0.46 |
每穗瘪谷数shriveled grains per panicle | -0.23 | 0.51 | 0.19 | 0.09 | -0.17 | 0.21 | -0.20 | 0.04 | -0.10 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.41 | 0.59 |
结实率 Seed setting rate | 0.36 | -0.35 | -0.19 | -0.11 | 0.28 | -0.20 | 0.25 | -0.24 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.59 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | -0.36 | 0.18 | 0.19 | -0.27 | 0.05 | -0.02 | 0.48 | -0.07 | 0.31 | -0.12 | 0.56 | -0.09 | -0.22 | 0.08 |
千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.38 | -0.12 | 0.17 | -0.09 | -0.01 | 0.01 | -0.30 | 0.61 | 0.18 | -0.14 | 0.48 | -0.01 | 0.21 | -0.06 |
单穗重Single spike weight | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.13 | -0.24 | -0.18 | -0.13 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.02 | -0.67 | 0.26 |
谷粒长 Grain length | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.54 | -0.06 | -0.02 | -0.13 | 0.35 | 0.21 | -0.07 | 0.07 | -0.39 | -0.54 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
谷粒宽 Grain width | 0.25 | 0.26 | -0.19 | -0.43 | -0.21 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.04 | -0.27 | 0.50 | -0.03 | -0.07 |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | -0.04 | -0.09 | 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.16 | -0.29 | 0.04 | -0.06 | 0.02 | -0.04 | -0.06 | 0.66 | -0.04 | -0.08 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 2.78 | 2.49 | 1.99 | 1.49 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 19.89 | 17.76 | 14.22 | 10.63 | 7.84 | 7.27 | 5.78 | 5.46 | 4.45 | 3.40 | 2.79 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 19.89 | 37.65 | 51.86 | 62.50 | 70.34 | 77.61 | 83.39 | 88.85 | 93.30 | 96.70 | 99.49 | 99.83 | 99.93 | 100.00 |
Table 3 Principal component analysis of early indica rice germplasm resources in Zhejiang Province
项目 Item | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生育期 Growth period | 0.12 | -0.16 | 0.10 | 0.45 | -0.19 | 0.48 | 0.15 | -0.10 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
株高 Plant height | -0.17 | 0.28 | -0.12 | -0.04 | 0.57 | -0.16 | -0.19 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.43 | -0.21 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.00 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length | 0.09 | 0.24 | -0.23 | 0.35 | -0.27 | -0.47 | 0.28 | 0.18 | -0.33 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.05 | -0.01 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf | 0.13 | 0.26 | -0.24 | 0.47 | -0.07 | -0.22 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.39 | -0.62 | -0.18 | -0.05 | -0.10 | 0.00 |
穗长 Panicle length | -0.06 | -0.06 | -0.07 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.28 | -0.38 | -0.15 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
每穗实粒数 Filled grains per panicle | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.06 | -0.04 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.05 | -0.46 | 0.01 | -0.03 | 0.15 | -0.06 | 0.45 | -0.46 |
每穗瘪谷数shriveled grains per panicle | -0.23 | 0.51 | 0.19 | 0.09 | -0.17 | 0.21 | -0.20 | 0.04 | -0.10 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.41 | 0.59 |
结实率 Seed setting rate | 0.36 | -0.35 | -0.19 | -0.11 | 0.28 | -0.20 | 0.25 | -0.24 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.59 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | -0.36 | 0.18 | 0.19 | -0.27 | 0.05 | -0.02 | 0.48 | -0.07 | 0.31 | -0.12 | 0.56 | -0.09 | -0.22 | 0.08 |
千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.38 | -0.12 | 0.17 | -0.09 | -0.01 | 0.01 | -0.30 | 0.61 | 0.18 | -0.14 | 0.48 | -0.01 | 0.21 | -0.06 |
单穗重Single spike weight | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.13 | -0.24 | -0.18 | -0.13 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.02 | -0.67 | 0.26 |
谷粒长 Grain length | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.54 | -0.06 | -0.02 | -0.13 | 0.35 | 0.21 | -0.07 | 0.07 | -0.39 | -0.54 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
谷粒宽 Grain width | 0.25 | 0.26 | -0.19 | -0.43 | -0.21 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.04 | -0.27 | 0.50 | -0.03 | -0.07 |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | -0.04 | -0.09 | 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.16 | -0.29 | 0.04 | -0.06 | 0.02 | -0.04 | -0.06 | 0.66 | -0.04 | -0.08 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 2.78 | 2.49 | 1.99 | 1.49 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 19.89 | 17.76 | 14.22 | 10.63 | 7.84 | 7.27 | 5.78 | 5.46 | 4.45 | 3.40 | 2.79 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 19.89 | 37.65 | 51.86 | 62.50 | 70.34 | 77.61 | 83.39 | 88.85 | 93.30 | 96.70 | 99.49 | 99.83 | 99.93 | 100.00 |
Fig.2 Scatter plot based on PCA in indica rice germplasm resources in Zhejiang Province PC represented the score values of principal components in different japonica rice resources, PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5,PC6 and PC7 represented the score values of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh principal component in different early indica rice resources, respectively.
排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number | 排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number | 排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number | 排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.76 | 13 | 26 | 0.44 | 97 | 51 | -0.04 | 80 | 76 | -0.43 | 59 |
2 | 1.32 | 25 | 27 | 0.38 | 89 | 52 | -0.04 | 43 | 77 | -0.43 | 9 |
3 | 1.19 | 11 | 28 | 0.37 | 62 | 53 | -0.07 | 32 | 78 | -0.49 | 57 |
4 | 0.99 | 26 | 29 | 0.36 | 40 | 54 | -0.07 | 49 | 79 | -0.50 | 91 |
5 | 0.95 | 5 | 30 | 0.34 | 29 | 55 | -0.07 | 44 | 80 | -0.51 | 46 |
6 | 0.95 | 24 | 31 | 0.33 | 39 | 56 | -0.11 | 36 | 81 | -0.51 | 50 |
7 | 0.91 | 30 | 32 | 0.32 | 2 | 57 | -0.12 | 48 | 82 | -0.51 | 23 |
8 | 0.87 | 12 | 33 | 0.32 | 31 | 58 | -0.15 | 33 | 83 | -0.52 | 52 |
9 | 0.85 | 92 | 34 | 0.29 | 7 | 59 | -0.16 | 93 | 84 | -0.53 | 38 |
10 | 0.82 | 72 | 35 | 0.20 | 69 | 60 | -0.19 | 34 | 85 | -0.53 | 86 |
11 | 0.77 | 42 | 36 | 0.19 | 19 | 61 | -0.21 | 83 | 86 | -0.56 | 65 |
12 | 0.77 | 3 | 37 | 0.19 | 1 | 62 | -0.22 | 45 | 87 | -0.56 | 68 |
13 | 0.75 | 18 | 38 | 0.18 | 90 | 63 | -0.24 | 63 | 88 | -0.64 | 37 |
14 | 0.74 | 51 | 39 | 0.17 | 79 | 64 | -0.25 | 41 | 89 | -0.64 | 6 |
15 | 0.73 | 14 | 40 | 0.15 | 55 | 65 | -0.26 | 15 | 90 | -0.76 | 54 |
16 | 0.70 | 74 | 41 | 0.13 | 75 | 66 | -0.26 | 70 | 91 | -0.83 | 21 |
17 | 0.67 | 100 | 42 | 0.12 | 77 | 67 | -0.28 | 81 | 92 | -0.86 | 85 |
18 | 0.60 | 95 | 43 | 0.08 | 27 | 68 | -0.31 | 4 | 93 | -0.87 | 98 |
19 | 0.60 | 73 | 44 | 0.06 | 8 | 69 | -0.34 | 67 | 94 | -0.90 | 84 |
20 | 0.58 | 22 | 45 | 0.00 | 87 | 70 | -0.37 | 35 | 95 | -1.08 | 88 |
21 | 0.57 | 17 | 46 | -0.01 | 64 | 71 | -0.40 | 71 | 96 | -1.11 | 10 |
22 | 0.54 | 56 | 47 | -0.02 | 66 | 72 | -0.41 | 53 | 97 | -1.14 | 99 |
23 | 0.53 | 20 | 48 | -0.03 | 82 | 73 | -0.42 | 94 | 98 | -1.14 | 76 |
24 | 0.49 | 16 | 49 | -0.03 | 60 | 74 | -0.43 | 58 | 99 | -1.34 | 78 |
25 | 0.45 | 28 | 50 | -0.04 | 47 | 75 | -0.43 | 96 | 100 | -1.37 | 61 |
Table 4 D value and ranking of 100 early indica rice germplasm resources
排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number | 排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number | 排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number | 排名 Ranking | D值 D-value | 编号 Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.76 | 13 | 26 | 0.44 | 97 | 51 | -0.04 | 80 | 76 | -0.43 | 59 |
2 | 1.32 | 25 | 27 | 0.38 | 89 | 52 | -0.04 | 43 | 77 | -0.43 | 9 |
3 | 1.19 | 11 | 28 | 0.37 | 62 | 53 | -0.07 | 32 | 78 | -0.49 | 57 |
4 | 0.99 | 26 | 29 | 0.36 | 40 | 54 | -0.07 | 49 | 79 | -0.50 | 91 |
5 | 0.95 | 5 | 30 | 0.34 | 29 | 55 | -0.07 | 44 | 80 | -0.51 | 46 |
6 | 0.95 | 24 | 31 | 0.33 | 39 | 56 | -0.11 | 36 | 81 | -0.51 | 50 |
7 | 0.91 | 30 | 32 | 0.32 | 2 | 57 | -0.12 | 48 | 82 | -0.51 | 23 |
8 | 0.87 | 12 | 33 | 0.32 | 31 | 58 | -0.15 | 33 | 83 | -0.52 | 52 |
9 | 0.85 | 92 | 34 | 0.29 | 7 | 59 | -0.16 | 93 | 84 | -0.53 | 38 |
10 | 0.82 | 72 | 35 | 0.20 | 69 | 60 | -0.19 | 34 | 85 | -0.53 | 86 |
11 | 0.77 | 42 | 36 | 0.19 | 19 | 61 | -0.21 | 83 | 86 | -0.56 | 65 |
12 | 0.77 | 3 | 37 | 0.19 | 1 | 62 | -0.22 | 45 | 87 | -0.56 | 68 |
13 | 0.75 | 18 | 38 | 0.18 | 90 | 63 | -0.24 | 63 | 88 | -0.64 | 37 |
14 | 0.74 | 51 | 39 | 0.17 | 79 | 64 | -0.25 | 41 | 89 | -0.64 | 6 |
15 | 0.73 | 14 | 40 | 0.15 | 55 | 65 | -0.26 | 15 | 90 | -0.76 | 54 |
16 | 0.70 | 74 | 41 | 0.13 | 75 | 66 | -0.26 | 70 | 91 | -0.83 | 21 |
17 | 0.67 | 100 | 42 | 0.12 | 77 | 67 | -0.28 | 81 | 92 | -0.86 | 85 |
18 | 0.60 | 95 | 43 | 0.08 | 27 | 68 | -0.31 | 4 | 93 | -0.87 | 98 |
19 | 0.60 | 73 | 44 | 0.06 | 8 | 69 | -0.34 | 67 | 94 | -0.90 | 84 |
20 | 0.58 | 22 | 45 | 0.00 | 87 | 70 | -0.37 | 35 | 95 | -1.08 | 88 |
21 | 0.57 | 17 | 46 | -0.01 | 64 | 71 | -0.40 | 71 | 96 | -1.11 | 10 |
22 | 0.54 | 56 | 47 | -0.02 | 66 | 72 | -0.41 | 53 | 97 | -1.14 | 99 |
23 | 0.53 | 20 | 48 | -0.03 | 82 | 73 | -0.42 | 94 | 98 | -1.14 | 76 |
24 | 0.49 | 16 | 49 | -0.03 | 60 | 74 | -0.43 | 58 | 99 | -1.34 | 78 |
25 | 0.45 | 28 | 50 | -0.04 | 47 | 75 | -0.43 | 96 | 100 | -1.37 | 61 |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 相关系数 Similarity coefficient |
---|---|
生育期 Growth period | 0.229* |
株高 Plant height | 0.029 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length | 0.128 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf | 0.214* |
穗长 Panicle length | 0.335** |
每穗实粒数 Flling particles per panicle | 0.804** |
每穗瘪谷数shriveled grains per panicle | 0.319** |
结实率 Seed setting rate | -0.009 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | -0.154 |
千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.350** |
单穗重Single spike weight | 0.847** |
谷粒长 Grain length | 0.618** |
谷粒宽 Grain width | 0.286** |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | 0.288** |
Table 5 Correlation coefficient between phenotypic characters and D value of comprehensive evaluation of 100 early indica rice germplasm resources
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 相关系数 Similarity coefficient |
---|---|
生育期 Growth period | 0.229* |
株高 Plant height | 0.029 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length | 0.128 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf | 0.214* |
穗长 Panicle length | 0.335** |
每穗实粒数 Flling particles per panicle | 0.804** |
每穗瘪谷数shriveled grains per panicle | 0.319** |
结实率 Seed setting rate | -0.009 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | -0.154 |
千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.350** |
单穗重Single spike weight | 0.847** |
谷粒长 Grain length | 0.618** |
谷粒宽 Grain width | 0.286** |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | 0.288** |
Fig.3 Cluster analysis of phenotypic traits of early indica rice germplasm resources in Zhejiang Province The numbers were the same as those in Table 1.
类群Number | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
生育期 Growth period/d | 112.86 | 114.28 | 114.39 | 114.82 |
株高 Plant height/cm | 96.93 | 86.70 | 87.22 | 87.45 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length/cm | 30.34 | 30.87 | 29.84 | 28.91 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf/cm | 32.11 | 32.94 | 32.99 | 32.14 |
穗长 Panicle length/cm | 21.18 | 20.43 | 21.25 | 22.06 |
每穗实粒数 Filled grains per panicle | 145.21 | 170.11 | 133.04 | 134.94 |
每穗瘪谷数Shriveled grains per panicle | 36.94 | 26.83 | 17.72 | 25.88 |
结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 79.89 | 86.44 | 88.41 | 83.99 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | 10.86 | 5.67 | 6.03 | 6.95 |
千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 24.21 | 27.11 | 25.79 | 26.01 |
单穗重Single spike weight/g | 3.94 | 6.06 | 4.40 | 4.49 |
谷粒长 Grain length/cm | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
谷粒宽 Grain width/cm | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.32 |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | 2.50 | 2.31 | 2.11 | 2.44 |
Table 6 The mean value of various indicators of different categories
类群Number | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
生育期 Growth period/d | 112.86 | 114.28 | 114.39 | 114.82 |
株高 Plant height/cm | 96.93 | 86.70 | 87.22 | 87.45 |
剑叶长 Flag leaf length/cm | 30.34 | 30.87 | 29.84 | 28.91 |
倒二叶长 Length of second leaf/cm | 32.11 | 32.94 | 32.99 | 32.14 |
穗长 Panicle length/cm | 21.18 | 20.43 | 21.25 | 22.06 |
每穗实粒数 Filled grains per panicle | 145.21 | 170.11 | 133.04 | 134.94 |
每穗瘪谷数Shriveled grains per panicle | 36.94 | 26.83 | 17.72 | 25.88 |
结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 79.89 | 86.44 | 88.41 | 83.99 |
单株有效穗 Effective panicle per plant | 10.86 | 5.67 | 6.03 | 6.95 |
千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 24.21 | 27.11 | 25.79 | 26.01 |
单穗重Single spike weight/g | 3.94 | 6.06 | 4.40 | 4.49 |
谷粒长 Grain length/cm | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
谷粒宽 Grain width/cm | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.32 |
谷粒长宽比 Length-width ratio | 2.50 | 2.31 | 2.11 | 2.44 |
[1] | 盛来运. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018. |
[2] |
徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, 等. 2020年我国水稻产业形势分析及2021年展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(2): 1-4.
DOI |
XU C C, JI L, CHEN Z D, et al. Analysis of China's rice industry in 2020 and the outlook for 2021[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(2): 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 王芳, 薛桂霞. 中国籼稻生产区域分析[J]. 杂交水稻, 2005, 20(3): 9-13. |
WANG F, XUE G X. Analysis of production region of indica rice in China[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2005, 20(3): 9-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | HASSAN PERVAIZ Z, RABBANI M A, KHALIQ I, et al. Genetic diversity associated with agronomic traits using microsatellite markers in Pakistani rice landraces[J]. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2010, 13(3): 4-5. |
[5] | 胡标林, 万勇, 李霞, 等. 水稻核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(5): 829-839. |
HU B L, WAN Y, LI X, et al. Analysis on genetic diversity of phenotypic traits in rice (Oryza sativa) core collection and its comprehensive assessment[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(5): 829-839. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[6] |
HUANG X, WEI X, SANG T, et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces[J]. Nature Genetics, 2010, 42(11):961-967.
DOI URL |
[7] |
VEASEY E A, DA SILVA E F, SCHAMMASS E A, et al. Morphoagronomic genetic diversity in American wild rice species[J]. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2008, 51(1): 94-104.
DOI URL |
[8] | 曾亚文, 李自超, 申时全, 等. 云南地方稻种的多样性及优异种质研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(3): 169-174. |
ZENG Y W, LI Z C, SHEN S Q, et al. Diversity and good germplasm of indigenous rice varieties in Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(3): 169-174. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] |
YAN W G, RUTGER J N, BRYANT R J, et al. Development and evaluation of a core subset of the USDA rice germplasm collection[J]. Crop Science, 2007, 47(2): 869-876.
DOI URL |
[10] | 陈小龙, 马利奋, 李培富, 等. 宁夏粳稻种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(33): 43-49. |
CHEN X L, MA L F, LI P F, et al. Genetic diversity of japonica rice varieties in ningxia Province by using phenotypic character[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(33): 43-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 张晓丽, 吕荣华, 王强, 等. 4个东南亚国家水稻种质的表型多样性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(12): 2617-2623. |
ZHANG X L, LV R H, WANG Q, et al. Phenotypic diversity evaluations of rice germplasm from four Southeast Asia countries[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 30(12): 2617-2623. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 韩龙植, 魏兴华. 水稻种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 3-120. |
[13] |
陈越, 张敦宇, 丁明亮, 等. 多个省份水稻资源的表型多样性与优异资源的筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1779-1789.
DOI |
CHEN Y, ZHANG D Y, DING M L, et al. Phenotypic diversity of rice resources in multiple provinces and screening of excellent resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31(11): 1779-1789. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[14] | 马均. 不同穗重型水稻的形态、理生化特性及产量潜力的研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2002. |
MA J. Study on the morphology, characteristics of physiology and biochemistry of different panicle weight type of rice(Oryza sative L.)[D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2002. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 孙建昌, 马静, 杨生龙, 等. 粳稻粒形对其产量及主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20(9): 50-53. |
SUN J C, MA J, YANG S L, et al. Analysis of grain shape to yield and some agronomic traits in japonica rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2011, 20(9): 50-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 潘存祥, 许勇, 纪海波, 等. 西瓜种质资源表型多样性及聚类分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(1): 59-63. |
PAN C X, XU Y, JI H B, et al. Phenotypic diversity and clustering analysis of watermelon germplasm[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(1): 59-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 贺治洲, 尹明, 谢振宇, 等. 热带水稻优异种质资源的表型遗传多样性分析[J]. 热带农业科学, 2014, 34(9): 37-42. |
HE Z Z, YIN M, XIE Z Y, et al. Genetic diversity of tropical rice germplasms measured by phenotypic traits[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2014, 34(9): 37-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 宫彦龙, 雷月, 闫志强, 等. 不同生态区粳稻资源表型遗传多样性综合评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(5): 71-79. |
GONG Y L, LEI Y, YAN Z Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of phenotype genetic diversity in japonica rice germplasm resources in different ecological zones[J]. Crops, 2020(5): 71-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 要燕杰, 高翔, 吴丹, 等. 小麦农艺性状与品质特性的多元分析与评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014, 15(1): 38-47. |
YAO Y J, GAO X, WU D, et al. Multivariate analysis and evaluation of agronomic and quality traits based on principal components in wheat[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2014, 15(1): 38-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | YANG Lei, HONG Lin, LIU Zhaojun, YANG Haijian, WANG Wu. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality and nutrition of six kumquat varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 534-547. |
[2] | MO Yanling, ZHANG Wenjing, LUO Yalan, ZENG Jing, CHEN Jingjing, LIU Yihua. Identification and evaluation of agronomic traits and nutritional quality traits in wide handle mustard germplam resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 317-328. |
[3] | HE Qinghai, LIU Bentong, ZHOU Zhengde, FANG Ru, YANG Shaozong. Diversity of Rubus chingii germplasm resources based on twig and leaf phenotypic traits [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1660-1667. |
[4] | HE Peng, ZHANG Tao, SONG Haiyun, ZHENG Shufang, QIN Zhenshi, TAN Qiujin, HUANG Xiyun, TANG Xiuhua, XU Peng, CHEN Haisheng, WANG Wenlin. Determination of suitable harvesting time of Macadamia integrifolia cv. HAES695 for processing of slotted nut [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1489-1496. |
[5] | ZHANG Jingzhen, WANG Lianjun, LEI Jian, CHAI Shasha, YANG Xinsun, ZHANG Wenying. Genetic diversity analysis and construction of DNA fingerprint of yam (Dioscorea oppositeac Thunb.) germplasm by cpSSR marker [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1222-1233. |
[6] | ZHAI Xiuming, LI Jie, TANG Min, HU Fangjie, ZHANG Jun, HOU Yujia, XU Ze. Diversity analysis of 30 tea (Camelia sinensis) germplasm resources in Chongqing based on agronomic traits and biochemical components [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1244-1255. |
[7] | ZHAO Ke, LI Qiurong, HOU Lu, BAI Yaobo, JIANG Liling, WEI Youhai, GUO Qingyun. Genetic analysis of stripe rust resistance genes in 2 spring wheat germplasm resources at adult stage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 595-601. |
[8] | ZHANG Faming, DING Feng, WANG Ping. Evaluation of high-quality agricultural development level in major grain producing areas in China and its spatial and temporal evolution [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 150-160. |
[9] | NIU Suzhen, AN Hongwei, SONG Qinfei, CHEN Zhengwu. Analysis and evaluation of soil nutrients of wild tea germplasm in Guizhou [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 1039-1048. |
[10] | SHEN Shengfa, XIANG Chao, WU Liehong, LI Bing, LUO Zhigao. Determination and difference analysis of soluble sugar content in 11 sweetpotato germplasm resources [J]. , 2020, 32(11): 1934-1940. |
[11] | XU Xiao, LUAN Haiye, ZHANG Yinghu, LU Jian, QIAO Hailong, ZANG Hui, YANG Hongyan, SHEN Huiquan. Morphological diversity of hulless barley accessions from Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. , 2019, 31(7): 1037-1044. |
[12] | CHEN Yue, ZHANG Dunyu, DING Mingliang, WANG Lingxian, XIAO Suqin, KE Xue, CHENG Zaiquan. Phenotypic diversity of rice resources in multiple provinces and screening of excellent resources [J]. , 2019, 31(11): 1779-1789. |
[13] | MAO Xiaobao, FU Linlin, MAO Xiaohong, AIHAITI Adila. Evaluation of agricultural sustainable development level in Zhejiang Province [J]. , 2019, 31(11): 1926-1934. |
[14] | CHENG Hua, LU Fengjun, LIU Qing. Whole chain closed-loop pattern on development and utilization of livestock and poultry germplasm resources: an illustration from Yukou Poultry Co., Ltd. [J]. , 2019, 31(10): 1734-1744. |
[15] | HONG Senrong, ZHANG Mingxin, YE Siyu, NING Bensong. Genetic diversity analysis of alpine potato germplasm resources by isozyme [J]. , 2018, 30(9): 1445-1453. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||