Performance of trehalose treatment on yield formation and quality of post-flowering heat-stressed weak gluten wheat Shengxuan No.6

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.01

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 1-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.01

• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Performance of trehalose treatment on yield formation and quality of post-flowering heat-stressed weak gluten wheat Shengxuan No.6

WANG Ben(), LI Yuxing, LI Zhe, JIANG Fengyi, HUANG Zhenglai(), FAN Yonghui, ZHANG Wenjing, MA Shangyu

College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on South Yellow & Huai River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei 230036, China

Received:2021-09-30 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-02-21

Abstract

Abstract:

To determine the effect of treatment with trehalose on yield formation and quality of post-flowering heat-stressed weak gluten wheat, the experiment was conducted in 2020-2021 at the National Agricultural Science and Technology Park in Huainan, Anhui Province, with high-quality weakly glutenous wheat Shengxuan No. 6 as the test material. The experiment was carried out at heading stage (T1), flowering stage (T2) and 10 days after flowering stage (T3). Treatment concentrations of trehalose were 5 mmol·L^-1 (C1), 10 mmol·L^-1 (C2), and 15 mmol·L^-1 (C3), with equal amounts of water sprayed as control, high temperature treatment was applied 15-19 d after flowering. The analysis showed that trehalose treatment increased grain yield of wheat under post-anthesis high temperature stress and improved the dry matter allocation and proportion of grains, and the dry matter allocation and proportion of nutrient organs displayed a decreasing trend after trehalose treatment, while the transport amount and rate of dry matter stored in nutrient organs before flowering to the grains and the accumulation of dry matter after flowering showed an increasing trend. With the increasing concentration of trehalose treatment the starch content of the grains also showed an increasing trend, and no significant difference was found between the two treatment levels of C2 and C3 in various treatment periods, however, the level of C3 was slightly higher than C2. Trehalose treatment reduced the content of grain albumin, globulin and gliadin protein, but the content of glutenin was higher than CK, and the glutein/gliadin value of the grains under trehalose treatment was significantly higher than CK. The trehalose-treated kernels were significantly different from CK in terms of protein content, wet gluten content, formation time, stabilization time and sedimentation value. The greatest improvement in grain yield and quality was achieved by spraying C3 concentration of trehalose at T1 period compared with CK under the study conditions of this experiment.

Key words: high temperature stress, weakly glutenous wheat, trehalose, yield formation, quality

CLC Number:

S512.1

WANG Ben, LI Yuxing, LI Zhe, JIANG Fengyi, HUANG Zhenglai, FAN Yonghui, ZHANG Wenjing, MA Shangyu. Performance of trehalose treatment on yield formation and quality of post-flowering heat-stressed weak gluten wheat Shengxuan No.6[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 1-9.

Figures/Tables 10

References 35

[1]	李曼, 张晓, 刘大同, 等. 弱筋小麦品质评价指标研究[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(9): 1979-1986. DOI
	LI M, ZHANG X, LIU D T, et al. Research on quality evaluation indices of weak gluten wheat[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 1979-1986. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	霍治国, 尚莹, 邬定荣, 等. 中国小麦干热风灾害研究进展[J]. 应用气象学报, 2019, 30(2): 129-141.
	HUO Z G, SHANG Y, WU D R, et al. Review on disaster of hot dry wind for wheat in China[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2019, 30(2): 129-141. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	RANE J, NAGARAJAN S. High temperature index-for field evaluation of heat tolerance in wheat varieties[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2004, 79(2): 243-255. DOI URL
[4]	HOSSAIN A, SARKER M A Z, SAIFUZZAMAN M, et al. Evaluation of growth, yield, relative performance and heat susceptibility of eight wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes grown under heat stress[J]. International Journal of Plant Production, 2013, 7(3): 615-636.
[5]	SPIERTZ J H J, HAMER R J, XU H, et al. Heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): effects on grain growth and quality traits[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 25(2): 89-95. DOI URL
[6]	KONOPKA I, FORNAL Ł, DZIUBA M, et al. Composition of proteins in wheat grain streams obtained by sieve classification[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2007, 87(12): 2198-2206. DOI URL
[7]	冯波, 曹芳, 李升东, 等. 灌浆期高温胁迫对不同品种小麦蛋白组分及面团揉混特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(3): 642-649. DOI
	FENG B, CAO F, LI S D, et al. Effects of high temperature stress during grain-filling stages on protein components and dough mixing properties in different wheat cultivars[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(3): 642-649. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	TIAN B, TALUKDER S K, FU J M, et al. Expression of a rice soluble starch synthase gene in transgenic wheat improves the grain yield under heat stress conditions[J]. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 2018, 54(3): 216-227.
[9]	LUO Y, XIE Y, HE D, et al. Exogenous trehalose protects photosystem Ⅱ by promoting cyclic electron flow under heat and drought stresses in winter wheat[J]. Plant Biology, 2021, 23(5): 770-776. DOI URL
[10]	LUO Y, WANG W, FAN Y Z, et al. Exogenously-supplied trehalose provides better protection for D1 protein in winter wheat under heat stress[J]. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2018, 65(1): 115-122. DOI URL
[11]	王迪, 罗音, 高亚敏, 等. 外施海藻糖对高温胁迫下小麦幼苗膜脂过氧化的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(7): 925-932.
	WANG D, LUO Y, GAO Y M, et al. Effects of exogenous trehalose on the membrane lipid peroxidation in wheat seedlings under heat stress[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(7): 925-932. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	马尚宇, 王艳艳, 刘雅男, 等. 播期、播量和施氮量对小麦干物质积累、转运和分配及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(3): 375-385.
	MA S Y, WANG Y Y, LIU Y N, et al. Effect of sowing date, planting density, and nitrogen application on dry matter accumulation, transfer, distribution, and yield of wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(3): 375-385. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[14]	王月福, 于振文, 李尚霞, 等. 施氮量对小麦籽粒蛋白质组分含量及加工品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9): 1071-1078.
	WANG Y F, YU Z W, LI S X, et al. Effects of nitrogen application amount on content of protein components and processing quality of wheat grain[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(9): 1071-1078. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	国家质量技术监督局. 中华人民共和国推荐性国家标准: 优质小麦弱筋小麦 GB/T 17893—1999[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[16]	宋维富, 周超, 杨雪峰, 等. 灌浆期不同阶段高温胁迫对春小麦籽粒生长的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(9): 1195-1200.
	SONG W F, ZHOU C, YANG X F, et al. Effect of heat stress during grain filling on grain growth of spring wheat varieties[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37(9): 1195-1200. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	赵彦坤, 王秀堂, 王静, 等. 热胁迫对不同小麦品种灌浆速率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(9): 1239-1245.
	ZHAO Y K, WANG X T, WANG J, et al. Effects of heat stress on grain-filling rate of different wheat varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(9): 1239-1245. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	曹彩云, 党红凯, 郑春莲, 等. 灌浆中后期高温对小麦黏度的影响及品种耐热性研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(11): 1351-1360.
	CAO C Y, DANG H K, ZHENG C L, et al. Impact of high temperature during late grain filling stage on viscosity and heat resistance of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(11): 1351-1360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	FAROOQ M, BRAMLEY H, PALTA J A, et al. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases[J]. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2011, 30(6): 491-507. DOI URL
[20]	LIU B, ASSENG S, LIU L L, et al. Testing the responses of four wheat crop models to heat stress at anthesis and grain filling[J]. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22(5): 1890-1903. DOI PMID
[21]	ZAMANI M M, NABIPOUR M, MESKARBASHEE M. Stem water soluble carbohydrate remobilization in wheat under heat stress during the grain filling[J]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2014, 16(2): 401-405.
[22]	张姗, 邵宇航, 石祖梁, 等. 施镁对花后高温胁迫下小麦干物质积累转运和籽粒灌浆的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(7): 963-969.
	ZHANG S, SHAO Y H, SHI Z L, et al. Effect of magnesium fertilization on dry matter accumulation and translocation and grain filling under post-anthesis heat stress in winter wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37(7): 963-969. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	江文文, 尹燕枰, 王振林, 等. 花后高温胁迫下氮肥追施后移对小麦产量及旗叶生理特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(5): 942-949.
	JIANG W W, YIN Y P, WANG Z L, et al. Effects of postponed application of nitrogen fertilizer on yield and physiological characteristics of flag leaf in wheat under post-anthesis heat stress[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(5): 942-949. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[24]	靖建国, 李有芳, 贾姝萍, 等. 花后高温胁迫下外施多胺对小麦干物质转运及籽粒生理特性影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(9): 8-14.
	JING J G, LI Y F, JIA S P, et al. Effects of applied polyamines on wheat assimilates transport and grain physiological characteristics under high temperature stress after anthesis[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2019, 38(9): 8-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	WANG X Z, LIU F L. Effects of elevated CO₂ and heat on wheat grain quality[J]. Plants, 2021, 10(5): 1027. DOI URL
[26]	HERNÁNDEZ-ESPINOSA N, MONDAL S, AUTRIQUE E, et al. Milling, processing and end-use quality traits of CIMMYT spring bread wheat germplasm under drought and heat stress[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 215: 104-112. DOI URL
[27]	TOMÁS D, VIEGAS W, SILVA M. Effects of post-anthesis heat waves on the grain quality of seven European wheat varieties[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(2): 268. DOI URL
[28]	CHINNUSAMY V, KHANNA-CHOPRA R. Effect of heat stress on grain starch content in diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid wheat species[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2003, 189(4): 242-249. DOI URL
[29]	ZHAO H, DAI T, JIANG D, et al. Effects of high temperature on key enzymes involved in starch and protein formation in grains of two wheat cultivars[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2008, 194(1): 47-54. DOI URL
[30]	LU H F, HU Y Y, WANG C Y, et al. Effects of high temperature and drought stress on the expression of gene encoding enzymes and the activity of key enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis in wheat grains[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 1414. DOI PMID
[31]	LOHOT V D, SHARMA-NATU P, PANDEY R, et al. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activity in relation to starch accumulation and grain growth in wheat cultivars[J]. Current Science, 2010, 98(3): 426-430.
[32]	尹云星, 王晨阳, 卢红芳, 等. 灌浆前期高温对小麦籽粒氮代谢关键酶活性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(2): 368-371.
	YIN Y X, WANG C Y, LU H F, et al. Effects of heat-shock on activities of key enzymes involving in nitrogen metabolism in wheat grains at early stage of grain filling[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2013, 33(2): 368-371. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	张英华, 王志敏. 小麦籽粒生长期热效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2006, 14(3): 8-11.
	ZHANG Y H, WANG Z M. The effect of heat stress on grain growth in the growing period of wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2006, 14(3): 8-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	王玲玲, 吴文革, 李瑞, 等. 施氮量对弱筋小麦籽粒品质与氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 777-784. DOI
	WANG L L, WU W G, LI R, et al. Effects of nitrogen rate on grain quality and nitrogen utilization of weak gluten wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 777-784. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[35]	倪静, 徐智斌, 王涛. 糯小麦灌浆期籽粒糖类、淀粉及蛋白质的动态研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(3): 509-514.
	NI J, XU Z B, WANG T. Dynamic changes of grain sugar, starch, protein contents during grain filling stage in waxy wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30(3): 509-514. (in Chinese with English abstract)

花后天数 Day after anthesis/d	处理时平均温 Average temperature at treatment/℃	处理时棚外平均温 Control mean temperature at treatment/℃	温度差 Temperature difference/℃
15	28.1	18.8	9.3
16	29.5	20.4	9.1
17	32.5	24.4	8.1
18	31.0	20.7	10.3
19	29.3	20.1	9.2

花后天数 Day after anthesis/d	处理时平均温 Average temperature at treatment/℃	处理时棚外平均温 Control mean temperature at treatment/℃	温度差 Temperature difference/℃
15	28.1	18.8	9.3
16	29.5	20.4	9.1
17	32.5	24.4	8.1
18	31.0	20.7	10.3
19	29.3	20.1	9.2

喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	籽粒 Grain		茎鞘+叶片 Steam and sheath and leaf		颖壳+穗轴 Glume and spike axis
喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	分配量 Allocation volume/g	比例 Proportion/%	分配量 Allocation volume/g	比例 Proportion/%	分配量 Allocation volume/g	比例 Proportion/%
T1	CK	1.20 f	41.86 d	1.28 a	43.87 a	0.38 c	13.27 d
	C1	1.26 e	43.40 c	1.28 a	43.49 c	0.35 e	12.15 i
	C2	1.34 b	44.96 b	1.26 b	41.69 g	0.37 d	12.42 h
	C3	1.43 a	47.49 a	1.23 e	41.11 i	0.34 f	11.29 l
T2	CK	1.19 f	42.78 cd	1.24 d	43.72 b	0.35 e	12.52 f
	C1	1.20 f	41.84 d	1.25 c	43.10 d	0.40 b	14.10 b
	C2	1.27 e	45.23 b	1.19 g	41.39 h	0.35 e	12.47 g
	C3	1.33 bc	47.27 a	1.02 h	35.78 l	0.45 a	16.16 a
T3	CK	1.20 f	42.49 cd	1.22 e	42.55 e	0.39 b	13.99 c
	C1	1.27 de	45.55 b	1.19 f	41.82 f	0.33 g	11.72 k
	C2	1.33 bc	46.56 a	1.18 g	40.54 k	0.34 f	12.00 j
	C3	1.30 cd	45.37 b	1.20 f	40.97 j	0.37 d	12.77 e
T		31.59^**	5.59^*	2 236.46^**	2 398.50^**	527.80^**	30 965.22^**
C		137.58^**	111.68^**	1 649.05^**	9 724.94^**	327.29^**	9 749.92^**
T×C		12.57^**	17.09^**	779.78^**	2 674.30^**	722.73^**	23 581.74^**

喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	籽粒 Grain		茎鞘+叶片 Steam and sheath and leaf		颖壳+穗轴 Glume and spike axis
喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	分配量 Allocation volume/g	比例 Proportion/%	分配量 Allocation volume/g	比例 Proportion/%	分配量 Allocation volume/g	比例 Proportion/%
T1	CK	1.20 f	41.86 d	1.28 a	43.87 a	0.38 c	13.27 d
	C1	1.26 e	43.40 c	1.28 a	43.49 c	0.35 e	12.15 i
	C2	1.34 b	44.96 b	1.26 b	41.69 g	0.37 d	12.42 h
	C3	1.43 a	47.49 a	1.23 e	41.11 i	0.34 f	11.29 l
T2	CK	1.19 f	42.78 cd	1.24 d	43.72 b	0.35 e	12.52 f
	C1	1.20 f	41.84 d	1.25 c	43.10 d	0.40 b	14.10 b
	C2	1.27 e	45.23 b	1.19 g	41.39 h	0.35 e	12.47 g
	C3	1.33 bc	47.27 a	1.02 h	35.78 l	0.45 a	16.16 a
T3	CK	1.20 f	42.49 cd	1.22 e	42.55 e	0.39 b	13.99 c
	C1	1.27 de	45.55 b	1.19 f	41.82 f	0.33 g	11.72 k
	C2	1.33 bc	46.56 a	1.18 g	40.54 k	0.34 f	12.00 j
	C3	1.30 cd	45.37 b	1.20 f	40.97 j	0.37 d	12.77 e
T		31.59^**	5.59^*	2 236.46^**	2 398.50^**	527.80^**	30 965.22^**
C		137.58^**	111.68^**	1 649.05^**	9 724.94^**	327.29^**	9 749.92^**
T×C		12.57^**	17.09^**	779.78^**	2 674.30^**	722.73^**	23 581.74^**

喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	花前干物质转运 Pre-anthesis dry matter translocation			花后干物质积累 Post-anthesis dry matter accumulation
喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	转运量 Translocation into grain/(kg·hm^-2)	转运率 Translocation ratio/%	对籽粒干物质贡献率 Contribution to grain/%	积累量 Assimilation amount/(kg·hm^-2)	对籽粒干物质贡献率 Contribution to grain/%
T1	CK	2 724.95 j	20.49 j	33.39 i	5 438.06 c	66.61 b
	C1	2 878.55 i	21.57 i	33.53 hi	5 708.35 b	66.47 bc
	C2	2 892.10 i	21.66 i	31.71 j	6 229.67 a	68.29 a
	C3	3 352.88 f	24.90 f	34.33 h	6 422.11 a	65.67 c
喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	花前干物质转运 Pre-anthesis dry matter translocation			花后干物质积累 Post-anthesis dry matter accumulation
喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	转运量 Translocation into grain/(kg·hm^-2)	转运率 Translocation ratio/%	对籽粒干物质贡献率 Contribution to grain/%	积累量 Assimilation amount/(kg·hm^-2)	对籽粒干物质贡献率 Contribution to grain/%
T2	CK	3 181.22 g	23.70 g	39.13 e	4 950.75 d	60.87 f
	C1	2 738.51 j	20.58 j	33.57 hi	5 420.39 c	66.43 bc
	C2	3 560.68 d	26.36 d	41.09 c	5 106.94 d	58.91 h
	C3	3 967.25 a	29.22 a	43.79 a	5 093.91 d	56.21 j
T3	CK	2 996.00 h	22.39 h	36.66 g	5 178.66 d	63.34 d
	C1	3 678.13 b	27.19 b	42.29 b	5 020.58 d	57.71 i
	C2	3 641.99 c	26.93 c	40.14 d	5 433.20 c	59.86 g
	C3	3 379.98 e	25.09 e	38.05 f	5 503.81 bc	61.95 e
T		5 075.23^**	3 896.35^**	670.48^**	146.17^**	670.38^**
C		4 368.38^**	3 353.54^**	49.66^**	27.89^**	49.65^**
T×C		2 342.76^**	1 798.68^**	150.84^**	15.27^**	150.82^**

Performance of trehalose treatment on yield formation and quality of post-flowering heat-stressed weak gluten wheat Shengxuan No.6

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 35

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	清蛋白 Albumin/%	球蛋白 Globulin/%	醇溶蛋白 Gliadin/%	谷蛋白 Glutein/%	谷/醇 Glutein/gliadin
T1	CK	3.19±0.01 a	2.37±0.01 a	2.34±0.06 a	2.80±0.03 i	1.20±0.03 g
	C1	2.97±0.04 b	2.07±0.01 e	1.94±0.05 b	3.00±0.03 f	1.55±0.03 f
	C2	2.83±0.04 cd	1.92±0.01 h	1.72±0.06 d	3.10±0.03 c	1.81±0.06 d
	C3	2.77±0.04 d	1.77±0.01 j	1.52±0.06 f	3.20±0.03 a	2.12±0.08 a
T2	CK	3.19±0.01 a	2.34±0.02 b	2.34±0.06 a	2.80±0.03 i	1.20±0.03 g
	C1	3.01±0.04 b	2.17±0.01 c	1.96±0.06 b	2.95±0.03 h	1.50±0.04 f
	C2	2.88±0.03 c	2.06±0.01 e	1.79±0.05 c	3.02±0.03 e	1.69±0.04 e
	C3	2.80±0.04 cd	1.97±0.01 g	1.62±0.04 e	3.10±0.03 c	1.92±0.03 c
T3	CK	3.19±0.01 a	2.37±0.01 a	2.34±0.06 a	2.80±0.03 i	1.20±0.03 g
	C1	2.98±0.04 b	2.12±0.01 d	1.95±0.06 b	2.97±0.03 g	1.53±0.04 f
	C2	2.85±0.04 cd	2.00±0.01 f	1.75±0.06 d	3.06±0.03 d	1.75±0.05 d
	C3	2.79±0.04 d	1.87±0.01 i	1.59±0.04 e	3.15±0.03 b	1.98±0.03 b
T		1.13	154.34^**	16.39^**	1 290.30^**	21.24^**
C		151.54^**	1 907.43^**	2 329.44^**	27 761.85^**	950.76^**
T×C		0.15	33.38^**	4.10^**	186.63^**	5.50^**

喷施时期 Application period	处理 Treatment	蛋白质 Protein content/%	容重 Bulk density/g	湿面筋 Wet gluten/%	形成时间 Formation time/min	稳定时间 Stabilization time/min	沉降值 Sedimentation value/mL
T1	CK	12.76±0.09 a	792.00±1.25 bc	26.14±0.17 a	7.60±0.05 a	2.87±0.03 a	20.53±0.50 a
	C1	12.16±0.09 c	790.67±0.27 bcde	23.58±0.17 c	6.90±0.14 b	2.27±0.03 c	16.47±0.05 b
	C2	11.86±0.09 e	788.00±1.63 e	21.69±0.17 e	6.07±0.03 cd	1.97±0.03 e	14.17±0.17 c
	C3	11.58±0.05 g	792.00±0.47 bc	21.37±0.18 g	5.37±0.19 e	1.70±0.05 g	12.50±0.08 d
T2	CK	12.76±0.09 a	791.67±1.19 bcd	26.14±0.17 a	7.60±0.05 a	2.87±0.03 a	20.53±0.50 a
	C1	12.22±0.09 b	792.00±1.25 bc	23.68±0.17 b	7.05±0.14 b	2.39±0.03 b	16.62±0.05 b
	C2	11.93±0.09 d	788.33±0.54 cde	22.44±0.17 d	6.28±0.03 c	2.15±0.03 d	14.33±0.17 c
	C3	11.79±0.09 f	791.00±0.00 bcde	21.68±0.17 e	5.59±0.19 e	1.91±0.03 ef	12.64±0.08 d
T3	CK	12.76±0.09 a	799.00±0.00 a	26.11±0.19 a	7.57±0.05 a	2.87±0.03 a	20.53±0.50 a
	C1	12.20±0.09 bc	791.67±1.19 bcd	23.75±0.19 b	7.02±0.14 b	2.36±0.03 b	16.59±0.05 b
	C2	11.93±0.09 d	792.33±0.98 b	22.45±0.19 d	6.30±0.03 c	2.10±0.03 d	14.33±0.17 c
	C3	11.75±0.09 f	794.33±0.72 b	21.58±0.19 f	5.73±0.05 de	1.85±0.03 f	12.62±0.08 d
T		31.90^**	14.49^**	109.87^**	2.32	26.40^**	0.18
C		2536.05^**	9.42^**	12 625.54^**	160.95^**	933.22^**	421.18^**
T×C		8.46^**	2.44^*	39.40^**	0.52	3.46^*	0.02

[1]	YOU Cuicui, HE Yizhe, XU Peng, HUANG Yaru, WANG Hui, HE Haibing, KE Jian, WU Liquan. Injury effect of high temperature stress on growth and development of rice and its defense countermeasures [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 10-22.
[2]	QIU Lefeng, ZHANG Ling, XU Baogen, WU Shaohua, XU Mingxing. Effects of non-grain transition of agricultural planting structure on nitrogen and phosphorus loss from cultivated land [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1995-2003.
[3]	YIN Xiyang, CHEN Yixuan, LI Dongmei, YU Xi. Evaluation and spatiotemporal evolution of agricultural supply quality in China in 2003-2019 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 2043-2054.
[4]	RU Chao, YU Jihua, WU Yue, FENG Zhi, GOU Zhaohui, JIN Ning, WANG Shuya, LIU Zeci, LYU Jian. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying bio-organic fertilizer on yield and quality of Chinese cabbage in open field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637.
[5]	ZOU Zhenhao, SUN Yeliang, ZHAO Yubao, LI Xin, ZHANG Liping, ZHANG Lan, DONG Chunwang, FU Jianyu, HAN Wenyan, YAN Peng. Effects of picking flower buds on yield and quality of tea in spring [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376.
[6]	WU Tao, JIANG Xiaofan, YANG Farong, WEI Yuming, CHEN Guoshun, CAI Yuan, JIAO Ting, HUANG Jie, ZHAO Shenguo. Effects of quinoa supplementation levels on quality and trace elements of Luhua chicken [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 897-907.
[7]	ZHAO Yuhong, HE Wen, LI Gen, WANG Qiang, XIE Rui, WANG Yan, CHEN Qing, WANG Xiaorong. Fruit quality of Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merrill and its bud mutants varieties in Sichuan area [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 995-1004.
[8]	YANG Jifen, YANG Wen, DU Wei, LIAO Pengfei, LIU Yonghui, BAI Hongying, DING Zhiwei, DONG Zhanpeng. Effect of spraying water to mulberry in autumn on breeding of Bombyx mori original species by juvenile hormone pesticide pollution [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 720-726.
[9]	CHEN Dailiang, HAN Yanchao, WU Weijie, DENG Shanggui, CHEN Hangjun, GAO Haiyan. Effect of special cushioning packaging on storage quality of Agaricus bisporus [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 801-807.
[10]	YANG Lei, HONG Lin, LIU Zhaojun, YANG Haijian, WANG Wu. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality and nutrition of six kumquat varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 534-547.
[11]	SUN Wenyan, LIU Xiaogang, ZHANG Wenhui, LI Huiyong, WU Lang, YANG Qiliang, XIONG Guomei. Optimization of drip fertigation scheme for Coffea arabica based on soil quality index [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 566-573.
[12]	HUANG Hexiao, ZHANG Xihua, ZHUO Ni, LI Baozhi, ZHANG Weijiang, ZHU Qibiao. Research on training behavior of high quality farmers from perspective of social capital demand: based on theory of planned behavior [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 652-660.
[13]	MO Yanling, ZHANG Wenjing, LUO Yalan, ZENG Jing, CHEN Jingjing, LIU Yihua. Identification and evaluation of agronomic traits and nutritional quality traits in wide handle mustard germplam resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 317-328.
[14]	CAI Jiye, FANG Xiangjun, HAN Yanchao, DING Yuting, CHEN Hangjun, WU Weijie, GAO Haiyan. Effect controlled atmosphere storage on postharvest preservation of Dongkui bayberry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 352-359.
[15]	ZHANG Yingping, TANG Honggang, LI Huanhuan, ZHANG Jin, CHEN Lihong, YANG Yeshuang, WANG Fulong, CHEN Yifan, ZHU Renjun. Effect of colorant and packaging on quality of Chinese sausage during storage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 360-369.