Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 205-214.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230414
• Food Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Henghui1,2(), WANG Junfeng3, HAN Yanchao2, CHEN Huizhi2, WU Weijie2, DING Yuting1, TONG Chuan1, GAO Haiyan2,*(
)
Received:
2023-03-30
Online:
2024-01-25
Published:
2024-02-18
CLC Number:
CHEN Henghui, WANG Junfeng, HAN Yanchao, CHEN Huizhi, WU Weijie, DING Yuting, TONG Chuan, GAO Haiyan. Effects of drying methods on quality of solid drinks made from mulberry leaves and barbary wolfberry fruits and its taste optimization[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 205-214.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230414
Fig.1 Effect of forced air drying (A), microwave drying (B), vacuum freeze drying (C) on physical fingerprints of powder ρb, Bulk density; ρt, Tap density; W, Water content; α, Angle of repose; H, Hygroscopicity; HR, Hausner ratio; P, Porosity; DC, Compressibility; D50, Median particle size; span, Particle size span; width, Particle size width.
干燥方式 Drying method | 堆积性 Accumulation | 稳定性 Stability | 流动性 Flowability | 可压性 Compressibility | 均一性 Homogeneity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD | 7.57±0.10 a | 2.61±0.11 a | 3.96±0.16 a | 3.48±0.19 c | 6.08±0.15 b |
MD | 6.67±0.15 b | 2.41±0.02 b | 3.30±0.05 b | 4.25±0.20 b | 5.73±0.02 c |
VFD | 5.83±0.10 c | 2.72±0.04 a | 3.48±0.22 b | 5.04±0.19 a | 8.23±0.08 a |
Table 1 Influence of drying methods on physical properties of powder
干燥方式 Drying method | 堆积性 Accumulation | 稳定性 Stability | 流动性 Flowability | 可压性 Compressibility | 均一性 Homogeneity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD | 7.57±0.10 a | 2.61±0.11 a | 3.96±0.16 a | 3.48±0.19 c | 6.08±0.15 b |
MD | 6.67±0.15 b | 2.41±0.02 b | 3.30±0.05 b | 4.25±0.20 b | 5.73±0.02 c |
VFD | 5.83±0.10 c | 2.72±0.04 a | 3.48±0.22 b | 5.04±0.19 a | 8.23±0.08 a |
指标 Index | 溶解性 Dissoluvability/ % | 溶解时间 Dissolution time/s | 湿润下沉时间 Moisture sinking time/s |
---|---|---|---|
FAD | 86.33±1.72 b | 81.07±2.95 a | 137.67±6.03 a |
MD | 89.63±3.01 ab | 78.67±2.55 ab | 117.00±2.53 b |
VFD | 93.37±0.99 a | 73.33±1.56 b | 111.00±4.36 b |
Table 2 Influence of drying methods on sissolution abilities of powder
指标 Index | 溶解性 Dissoluvability/ % | 溶解时间 Dissolution time/s | 湿润下沉时间 Moisture sinking time/s |
---|---|---|---|
FAD | 86.33±1.72 b | 81.07±2.95 a | 137.67±6.03 a |
MD | 89.63±3.01 ab | 78.67±2.55 ab | 117.00±2.53 b |
VFD | 93.37±0.99 a | 73.33±1.56 b | 111.00±4.36 b |
Fig.2 Effect of drying methods on moisture absorption rate of powder FAD, Forced air drying; MD, Microwave drying; VFD, Vacuum freeze drying. The same as below.
干燥方式 Drying method | 吸湿方程 Hygroscopic equation | 吸湿速率方程 Hygroscopic rate equation | 吸湿平衡时间 Hygroscopic equilibrium time/h | 平衡吸湿率 Moisture absorption rate/% | 吸湿初速度 Initial hygroscopic velocity/ (g·h-1) | 吸湿加速度 Hygroscopic acceleration/ (g·h-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD | y=-0.001 4t2+0.387t+1.631 | y'=-0.003 0t+0.387 | 108 | 33.0 | 0.387 | -0.002 8 |
MD | y=-0.001 3t2+0.414t+3.641 | y'=-0.002 5t+0.414 | 168 | 36.5 | 0.462 | -0.002 5 |
VFD | y=-0.001 5t2+0.343t+2.727 | y'=-0.003 0t+0.343 | 156 | 30.9 | 0.343 | -0.003 0 |
Table 3 Moisture absorption equation and related indexes for drying methods
干燥方式 Drying method | 吸湿方程 Hygroscopic equation | 吸湿速率方程 Hygroscopic rate equation | 吸湿平衡时间 Hygroscopic equilibrium time/h | 平衡吸湿率 Moisture absorption rate/% | 吸湿初速度 Initial hygroscopic velocity/ (g·h-1) | 吸湿加速度 Hygroscopic acceleration/ (g·h-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD | y=-0.001 4t2+0.387t+1.631 | y'=-0.003 0t+0.387 | 108 | 33.0 | 0.387 | -0.002 8 |
MD | y=-0.001 3t2+0.414t+3.641 | y'=-0.002 5t+0.414 | 168 | 36.5 | 0.462 | -0.002 5 |
VFD | y=-0.001 5t2+0.343t+2.727 | y'=-0.003 0t+0.343 | 156 | 30.9 | 0.343 | -0.003 0 |
干燥方式 Drying method | L* | a* | b* | ΔE |
---|---|---|---|---|
FAD | 21.74± 1.22 b | 8.54± 0.35 b | 16.75± 0.64 b | 76.78± 0.22 b |
MD | 18.52± 0.63 c | 2.83± 0.44 c | 6.03± 0.37 c | 78.96± 0.61 a |
VFD | 25.88± 0.52 a | 10.31± 0.27 a | 22.61± 0.78 a | 75.06± 0.25 c |
Table 4 Influence of drying methods on color of powder
干燥方式 Drying method | L* | a* | b* | ΔE |
---|---|---|---|---|
FAD | 21.74± 1.22 b | 8.54± 0.35 b | 16.75± 0.64 b | 76.78± 0.22 b |
MD | 18.52± 0.63 c | 2.83± 0.44 c | 6.03± 0.37 c | 78.96± 0.61 a |
VFD | 25.88± 0.52 a | 10.31± 0.27 a | 22.61± 0.78 a | 75.06± 0.25 c |
试验编号 Test number | A | B | C | 口感评分 Taste score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | -1 -1 1 1 0 0 0 0 -1 1 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 69.4 70.1 69.4 73.1 69.2 84.4 78.4 72.3 71.6 80.0 75.1 70.6 84.7 86.3 84.9 85.1 85.8 |
Table 5 Trial design and result
试验编号 Test number | A | B | C | 口感评分 Taste score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | -1 -1 1 1 0 0 0 0 -1 1 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 69.4 70.1 69.4 73.1 69.2 84.4 78.4 72.3 71.6 80.0 75.1 70.6 84.7 86.3 84.9 85.1 85.8 |
[15] | WANG Y J, AN W, SHI Z G, et al. Research progress in wolfberry medicinal properties[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(30): 13213-13214. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | 孙冰, 王晗, 王际辉. 枸杞中活性物质的提取及抗氧化活性的研究[C]// 中国食品科学技术学会第八届年会暨第六届东西方食品业高层论坛论文摘要集. 上海: 中国食品科学技术学会, 2011: 44. |
[17] | LIU J F, BAUM L, YU S S, et al. Preservation of retinal function through synaptic stabilization in Alzheimer’s disease model mouse retina by Lycium barbarum extracts[J]. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2022, 13: 788798. |
[18] | ZHOU H T, DING S S, SUN C X, et al. Lycium barbarum extracts extend lifespan and alleviate proteotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2022, 8: 815947. |
[19] | WANG Y, SUN M Y, JIN H Y, et al. Effects of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on immunity and the gut microbiota in cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressed mice[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12: 701566. |
[20] | 冷进松, 徐庆杰. 人参、枸杞复合固体饮料加工工艺的研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2014, 35(24): 103-108. |
LENG J S, XU Q J. Study on ginseng, wolfberry compound solid beverage processing technology[J]. Food Research and Development, 2014, 35(24): 103-108. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 姜城红, 施雯怡, 张喜玲, 等. 响应面法优化麦胚山楂复合固体饮料配方的研究[J]. 农产品加工, 2022(20): 5-10. |
JIANG C H, SHI W Y, ZHANG X L, et al. Study on optimization of wheat germ hawthorn composite solid drink formula by response surface method[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2022(20): 5-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 黄蓉, 周倩, 吴敏, 等. 桑叶青钱柳复合固体饮料的研究[J]. 农产品加工, 2022(14): 5-9. |
HUANG R, ZHOU Q, WU M, et al. Development of mulberry leaf and Cyclocarya paliurus solid beverage[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2022(14): 5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 李延年. 丹参浸膏干燥工艺与品质相关性研究[D]. 成都: 成都中医药大学, 2018. |
LI Y N. Study on the correlation of drying methods and quality of Salvia extract[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 王瑜婷, 徐东婷, 邓桂海, 等. 干燥方式对黄连浸膏粉物理指纹图谱和有效成分的影响[J]. 广东药科大学学报, 2022, 38(1): 63-69. |
[1] | 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 固体饮料: GB/T 29602—2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014. |
[2] | 张佳欣, 范松林, 谢顾, 等. 固体饮料的性质及加工技术应用进展[J]. 轻工科技, 2017, 33(9): 8-10. |
[24] | WANG Y T, XU D T, DENG G H, et al. The effect of different drying methods on physical fingerprint and effective components of Coptidis Rhizoma extract powder[J]. Journal of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, 2022, 38(1): 63-69. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | 余欣彤, 黎桃敏, 施文婷, 等. 干燥方式对板蓝根浸膏粉HPLC及物理指纹图谱的影响[J]. 现代中药研究与实践, 2022, 36(1): 66-71. |
[2] | ZHANG J X, FAN S L, XIE G, et al. Properties of solid beverage and application progress of processing technology[J]. Light Industry Science and Technology, 2017, 33(9): 8-10. (in Chinese) |
[3] | 张玉蝶, 蒋佳洛, 卢冬晴, 等. 真空冷冻干燥技术在固体饮料中的应用[J]. 轻工科技, 2018, 34(11): 26-27. |
[25] | YU X T, LI T M, SHI W T, et al. Effects of drying methods on HPLC and physical fingerprint of isatidis Radix extract powders[J]. Research and Practice on Chinese Medicines, 2022, 36(1): 66-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | 罗铮, 邓雯, 张前亮, 等. 基于中药QbD理念的当归破壁粉质量评价研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2020, 45(5): 1105-1113. |
[3] | ZHANG Y D, JIANG J L, LU D Q, et al. Application of vacuum freeze-drying technology in solid beverage[J]. Light Industry Science and Technology, 2018, 34(11): 26-27. (in Chinese) |
[4] | 付博飞, 奚祝, 彭小伟, 等. 喷雾干燥对固体饮料制备的影响[J]. 农产品加工, 2018(11): 62-64. |
FU B F, XI Z, PENG X W, et al. Effect of spray drying on the preparation of solid drinks[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2018(11): 62-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 许健豪, 钟杨生, 陈芳艳, 等. 桑叶中的活性功能物质及桑叶茶的开发利用[J]. 广东蚕业, 2015, 49(1): 29-33. |
[26] | LUO Z, DENG W, ZHANG Q L, et al. Quality evaluation of angelica broken wall powder based on QbD concept of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2020, 45(5): 1105-1113. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | 任彩霞. 杜仲速溶固体饮料的研制[J]. 现代食品, 2022, 28(10): 90-94. |
REN C X. Study on preparation of Eucommia ulmoides oliver instant solid beverage[J]. Modern Food, 2022, 28(10): 90-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 陈安利, 马卓, 陈艳熙. 不同干燥方式对茯苓枸杞固体饮料品质影响的研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2022, 33(4): 196-203. |
[5] | XU J H, ZHONG Y S, CHEN F Y, et al. Active functional substances in mulberry leaves and the development and utilization of mulberry leaf tea[J]. Guangdong Sericulture, 2015, 49(1): 29-33. (in Chinese) |
[6] | 杨玉珍. 桑叶有效成分的提取、生物学功能及动物生产中的应用[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(15): 156-159. |
[28] | CHEN A L, MA Z, CHEN Y X. Comparison of effect of different drying methods on the quality of poria Cocos and wolfberry solid beverage[J]. China Food Additives, 2022, 33(4): 196-203. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | 张淑丹, 高建德, 宋萍, 等. 不同药用辅料对枸杞颗粒吸湿性及成型性的影响[J]. 中成药, 2020, 42(6): 1406-1410. |
[6] | YANG Y Z. Extraction, biological function and application of animal production from mulberry leaves[J]. Feed Research, 2022, 45(15): 156-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | 赵林.桑叶的功效成分、 药理作用及应用综述[C]// 2021中国药膳学术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国药膳研究会, 2021: 382-387. |
[29] | ZHANG S D, GAO J D, SONG P, et al. Effects of different pharmaceutical excipients on the hygroscopicity and formability of Lycii Fructus granules[J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2020, 42(6): 1406-1410. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | 乔子桐, 付慧敏, 张纯刚, 等. 芪黄通秘软胶囊吸湿动力学研究[J]. 中南药学, 2022, 20(1): 70-74. |
[8] | 王霞, 肖定福. 桑叶提取物对动物免疫功能的调节作用及其机理研究进展[J]. 饲料博览, 2020(12): 9-13. |
WANG X, XIAO D F. Research progress on the effect of mulberry leaf extract on immune function and its mechanism[J]. Feed Review, 2020(12): 9-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | QIAO Z T, FU H M, ZHANG C G, et al. Hygroscopicity dynamics of Qihuang Tongmi soft capsules[J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2022, 20(1): 70-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | NIELSEN S S. Total carbohydrate by phenol-sulfuric acid method[M]// Food Analysis Laboratory Manual. Cham: Springer, 2017: 137-141. |
[9] | WANG Y S, SONG K Y, KIM Y. Effects of thermally treated mulberry leaves on the quality, properties, and antioxidant activities of yogurt[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2022, 46(1): e16139. |
[10] | AFZAL F, KHALID W, NAVEED ASIF M, et al. Role of mulberry leaves in human nutrition: a review[J]. Acta Scientifci Nutritional Health, 2021, 4(3): 43-50. |
[32] | 严锐, 韩延超, 吴伟杰, 等. 水杨酸处理对鲜莲采后品质及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2022, 22(3): 235-245. |
YAN R, HAN Y C, WU W J, et al. Effect of salicylic acid treatment on the postharvest quality and antioxidant enzyme activity of fresh lotus[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2022, 22(3): 235-245. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | MA F, SHEN W W, ZHANG X Q, et al. Anti-HSV activity of kuwanon X from mulberry leaves with genes expression inhibitory and HSV-1 induced NF-κB deactivated properties[J]. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2016, 39(10): 1667-1674. |
[12] | MA G Q, CHAI X Y, HOU G G, et al. Phytochemistry, bioactivities and future prospects of mulberry leaves: a review[J]. Food Chemistry, 2022, 372: 131335. |
[33] | 刘涛, 付春梅, 唐玉, 等. 不同干燥方式对桑枝提取物物理指纹图谱及其总黄酮含量的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2019, 25(3): 34-38. |
LIU T, FU C M, TANG Y, et al. Effect of different drying methods on physical fingerprint and total flavonoids content of Mori Ramulus extract[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, 2019, 25(3): 34-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 王晓雨, 利通, 常晨光, 等. 促干护色剂在枸杞干制过程中促干护色机理的研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023, 49(14): 41-49. |
WANG X Y, LI T, CHANG C G, et al. Study on mechanism of drying-promoting and color-protecting agent during drying process of Lycium barbarum[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2023, 49(14): 41-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 刘静波, 马爽, 刘博群, 等. 不同干燥方式对全蛋粉冲调性能的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(12): 383-388. |
LIU J B, MA S, LIU B Q, et al. Effects of different drying methods on solubility of whole egg powder[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(12): 383-388. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 邵翠翠, 邓源喜, 杨蓓蓓, 等. 枸杞的营养保健功能及其应用进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(17): 39-41. |
SHAO C C, DENG Y X, YANG B B, et al. The nutritional value and health function of Lycium barbarum and its application progress[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 26(17): 39-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | KROKIDA M K, PHILIPPOPOULOS C. Rehydration of dehydrated foods[J]. Drying Technology, 2005, 23(4): 799-830. |
[36] | 李瑞杰, 张慜. 不同干燥方式对胡萝卜片吸湿性及品质的影响[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2010, 29(3): 342-349. |
LI R J, ZHANG M. Drying methods affect the quality and hygroscopic capacity of carrot chips[J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2010, 29(3): 342-349. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 朱诗竟. 中药浸膏粉体吸湿性及其表面改性技术的应用研究[D]. 南京: 南京中医药大学, 2014. |
ZHU S J. The research for the hygroscopic properties and modification technology of medicine extract powder[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 范凌云, 余琰, 高建德, 等. 不同辅料对三黄粉吸湿性的影响[J]. 中成药, 2015, 37(12): 2764-2766. |
FAN L Y, YU Y, GAO J D, et al. Effect of different excipients on hygroscopicity of Sanhuang Powder[J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2015, 37(12): 2764-2766. (in Chinese) | |
[39] | TAIEB B A, ADEL K, SLAWOMIR K. Effect of thermal process and drying principle on color loss of pineapple slices[J]. American Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2014, 2(1): 17-20. |
[40] | MA Q Q, SANTHANAM R K, XUE Z H, et al. Effect of different drying methods on the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of mulberry leaves polysaccharides[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 119: 1137-1143. |
[41] | 苏敬红, 牛格格, 吴佳琦, 等. 不同干燥方式对火龙果茎多糖理化特性及功能活性的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(15): 34-39. |
SU J H, NIU G G, WU J Q, et al. Effects of different drying methods on physicochemical properties and functional activities of polysaccharides from Hylocereus undatus stem[J]. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42(15): 34-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | VEGAS C, ZAVALETA A I, ZARZOSO B. Optimization of fermentation process conditions for chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens) fruit using response surface methodology[J]. Agronomía Colombiana, 2018, 36(1): 88-96. |
[15] | 王亚军, 安巍, 石志刚, 等. 枸杞药用价值的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(30): 13213-13214. |
[1] | WANG Xiaoyan, HAN Yanchao, WU Weijie, DENG Shanggui, CHEN Hangjun, FANG Xiangjun, GAO Haiyan. Effects of different drying methods on quality and volatile flavor of pineapple [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1168-1177. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||