Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1879-1888.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.11
• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
SONG Wen1(), WANG Qiang1, ZHANG Jia2, LIU Caixiu1, ZHANG Nan2, CHEN Liping1, NIE Dongxing2, YAO Haili1, CANG Tao1,*(
)
Received:
2021-01-28
Online:
2021-10-25
Published:
2021-11-02
Contact:
CANG Tao
CLC Number:
SONG Wen, WANG Qiang, ZHANG Jia, LIU Caixiu, ZHANG Nan, CHEN Liping, NIE Dongxing, YAO Haili, CANG Tao. Effects of forchlorfenuron on growth and quality of Fujiminori grape under different fertilizer applications[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1879-1888.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.11
处理 Treatment | 施肥方式 Fertilizer application | 氯吡脲Forchlorfenuron(0.1% CPPU SL) | |
---|---|---|---|
稀释倍数 Dilution ratio/times | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredients/(mg·kg-1) | ||
A1B1 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 20 | 50 |
A1B2 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 50 | 20 |
A1B3 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 100 | 10 |
A1B4 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 0 | 0 |
A2B1 | 无肥料供给None | 20 | 50 |
A2B2 | 无肥料供给None | 50 | 20 |
A2B3 | 无肥料供给None | 100 | 10 |
A2B4 | 无肥料供给None | 0 | 0 |
Table 1 Experimental design
处理 Treatment | 施肥方式 Fertilizer application | 氯吡脲Forchlorfenuron(0.1% CPPU SL) | |
---|---|---|---|
稀释倍数 Dilution ratio/times | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredients/(mg·kg-1) | ||
A1B1 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 20 | 50 |
A1B2 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 50 | 20 |
A1B3 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 100 | 10 |
A1B4 | 充足肥料供给Adequate | 0 | 0 |
A2B1 | 无肥料供给None | 20 | 50 |
A2B2 | 无肥料供给None | 50 | 20 |
A2B3 | 无肥料供给None | 100 | 10 |
A2B4 | 无肥料供给None | 0 | 0 |
分级 Grade | 葡萄大小粒 Grainsize uniformity | 穗梗木栓化 Stem suberization |
---|---|---|
0级 Grade 0 | 无大小粒现象 None | 无木栓化现象 None |
1级 Grade 1 | 小粒不超过全穗10% Small berries≤10% | 轻微木栓化 Slight |
2级 Grade 2 | 小粒不超过全穗40% Small berries≤40% | 中等木栓化 Medium |
3级 Grade 3 | 小粒不超过全穗60% Small berries≤60% | 严重木栓化 Serious |
4级 Grade 4 | 小粒超过全穗60% Small berries>60% | — |
Table 2 Grading standard of grain size uniformity and fruit stem suberization
分级 Grade | 葡萄大小粒 Grainsize uniformity | 穗梗木栓化 Stem suberization |
---|---|---|
0级 Grade 0 | 无大小粒现象 None | 无木栓化现象 None |
1级 Grade 1 | 小粒不超过全穗10% Small berries≤10% | 轻微木栓化 Slight |
2级 Grade 2 | 小粒不超过全穗40% Small berries≤40% | 中等木栓化 Medium |
3级 Grade 3 | 小粒不超过全穗60% Small berries≤60% | 严重木栓化 Serious |
4级 Grade 4 | 小粒超过全穗60% Small berries>60% | — |
处理 Treatment | 大小粒指数 Grain size uniformity index | 穗梗直径 Stem diameter/mm | 穗梗木栓化指数 Stem suberization index |
---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 25.0 bc | 8.31 ab | 29.6 a |
A1B2 | 12.5 d | 7.99 ab | 13.0 bc |
A1B3 | 22.9 c | 7.35 bc | 13.0 bc |
A1B4 | 29.9 abc | 6.65 c | 0 c |
A2B1 | 36.8 a | 8.38 a | 31.5 a |
A2B2 | 35.4 a | 8.00 ab | 24.1 ab |
A2B3 | 34.7 a | 8.26 ab | 18.5 ab |
A2B4 | 31.9 ab | 7.02 c | 0 c |
Table 3 Grain size uniformity index, stem diameter and stem suberization index of Fujiminori grape under different fertilizer applications and forchlorfenuron concentrations
处理 Treatment | 大小粒指数 Grain size uniformity index | 穗梗直径 Stem diameter/mm | 穗梗木栓化指数 Stem suberization index |
---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 25.0 bc | 8.31 ab | 29.6 a |
A1B2 | 12.5 d | 7.99 ab | 13.0 bc |
A1B3 | 22.9 c | 7.35 bc | 13.0 bc |
A1B4 | 29.9 abc | 6.65 c | 0 c |
A2B1 | 36.8 a | 8.38 a | 31.5 a |
A2B2 | 35.4 a | 8.00 ab | 24.1 ab |
A2B3 | 34.7 a | 8.26 ab | 18.5 ab |
A2B4 | 31.9 ab | 7.02 c | 0 c |
处理 Treatment | 大小粒指数 Grain size uniformity index | 穗梗直径 Stem diameter | 穗梗木栓化指数 Stem suberization index |
---|---|---|---|
A | 42.24** | 2.57 | 2.55 |
B | 3.07 | 9.38** | 18.77** |
A×B | 5.18* | 0.95 | 0.71 |
Table 4 Results of variance analysis(F value)
处理 Treatment | 大小粒指数 Grain size uniformity index | 穗梗直径 Stem diameter | 穗梗木栓化指数 Stem suberization index |
---|---|---|---|
A | 42.24** | 2.57 | 2.55 |
B | 3.07 | 9.38** | 18.77** |
A×B | 5.18* | 0.95 | 0.71 |
处理 Treatment | 果粒纵径 Berry vertical diameter/mm | 果粒横径 Berry horizontal diameter/mm | 果形指数 Berry shape index |
---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 32.69 a | 31.39 a | 1.04 a |
A1B2 | 30.96 ab | 29.54 ab | 1.05 a |
A1B3 | 29.66 b | 28.33 b | 1.05 a |
A1B4 | 27.55 cd | 25.03 c | 1.10 a |
A2B1 | 30.11 b | 29.47 ab | 1.02 a |
A2B2 | 29.11 bc | 28.12 b | 1.04 a |
A2B3 | 28.93 bc | 28.02 b | 1.03 a |
A2B4 | 26.22 d | 24.16 c | 1.09 a |
Table 5 Berry vertical diameter, horizontal diameter and shape index of Fujiminori grape under different fertilizer applications and forchlorfenuron concentrations
处理 Treatment | 果粒纵径 Berry vertical diameter/mm | 果粒横径 Berry horizontal diameter/mm | 果形指数 Berry shape index |
---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 32.69 a | 31.39 a | 1.04 a |
A1B2 | 30.96 ab | 29.54 ab | 1.05 a |
A1B3 | 29.66 b | 28.33 b | 1.05 a |
A1B4 | 27.55 cd | 25.03 c | 1.10 a |
A2B1 | 30.11 b | 29.47 ab | 1.02 a |
A2B2 | 29.11 bc | 28.12 b | 1.04 a |
A2B3 | 28.93 bc | 28.02 b | 1.03 a |
A2B4 | 26.22 d | 24.16 c | 1.09 a |
处理 Treatment | 果粒纵径 Berry vertical diameter | 果粒横径 Berry horizontal diameter | 果形指数 Berry shape index |
---|---|---|---|
A | 12.26** | 6.68* | 0.74 |
B | 16.59** | 31.93** | 2.29 |
A×B | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.03 |
Table 6 Results of variance analysis(F value)
处理 Treatment | 果粒纵径 Berry vertical diameter | 果粒横径 Berry horizontal diameter | 果形指数 Berry shape index |
---|---|---|---|
A | 12.26** | 6.68* | 0.74 |
B | 16.59** | 31.93** | 2.29 |
A×B | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.03 |
处理 Treatment | 百粒重 100-berry weight/kg | 穗质量 Bunch weight/g |
---|---|---|
A1B1 | 1.90 a | 1045.9 a |
A1B2 | 1.70 ab | 997.1 b |
A1B3 | 1.49 bc | 976.3 bc |
A1B4 | 1.21 cd | 836.5 d |
A2B1 | 1.62 ab | 987.1 bc |
A2B2 | 1.48 bc | 964.7 c |
A2B3 | 1.48 bc | 957.0 c |
A2B4 | 0.99 d | 805.0 e |
Table 7 100-berry weight and bunch weight of Fujiminori grape under different fertilizer applications and forchlorfenuron concentrations
处理 Treatment | 百粒重 100-berry weight/kg | 穗质量 Bunch weight/g |
---|---|---|
A1B1 | 1.90 a | 1045.9 a |
A1B2 | 1.70 ab | 997.1 b |
A1B3 | 1.49 bc | 976.3 bc |
A1B4 | 1.21 cd | 836.5 d |
A2B1 | 1.62 ab | 987.1 bc |
A2B2 | 1.48 bc | 964.7 c |
A2B3 | 1.48 bc | 957.0 c |
A2B4 | 0.99 d | 805.0 e |
处理 Treatment | 百粒重 100-berry weight | 穗质量 Bunch weight |
---|---|---|
A | 5.63* | 55.99** |
B | 16.73** | 330.75** |
A×B | 1.26 | 3.09 |
Table 8 Results of variance analysis(F value)
处理 Treatment | 百粒重 100-berry weight | 穗质量 Bunch weight |
---|---|---|
A | 5.63* | 55.99** |
B | 16.73** | 330.75** |
A×B | 1.26 | 3.09 |
处理 Treatment | 可溶性 固形物 Soluble solid/% | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid/(g· kg-1) | 糖酸比 Sugar- acid ratio | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids/ (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 11.02 bc | 4.70 a | 23.4 | 0.31 e |
A1B2 | 11.52 ab | 3.40 c | 33.9 | 0.54 c |
A1B3 | 12.27 a | 4.00 bc | 30.7 | 0.96 a |
A1B4 | 11.42 b | 4.07 b | 28.1 | 0.63 b |
A2B1 | 10.52 c | 3.93 b | 26.8 | 0.25 e |
A2B2 | 10.52 c | 4.30 ab | 24.5 | 0.39 d |
A2B3 | 11.27 bc | 4.07 b | 27.7 | 0.64 b |
A2B4 | 11.28 bc | 4.20 ab | 26.9 | 0.61 b |
Table 9 Contents of soluble solid, titratable acid and total flavonoids of Fujiminori grape under different fertilizer applications and forchlorfenuron concentrations
处理 Treatment | 可溶性 固形物 Soluble solid/% | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid/(g· kg-1) | 糖酸比 Sugar- acid ratio | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids/ (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 11.02 bc | 4.70 a | 23.4 | 0.31 e |
A1B2 | 11.52 ab | 3.40 c | 33.9 | 0.54 c |
A1B3 | 12.27 a | 4.00 bc | 30.7 | 0.96 a |
A1B4 | 11.42 b | 4.07 b | 28.1 | 0.63 b |
A2B1 | 10.52 c | 3.93 b | 26.8 | 0.25 e |
A2B2 | 10.52 c | 4.30 ab | 24.5 | 0.39 d |
A2B3 | 11.27 bc | 4.07 b | 27.7 | 0.64 b |
A2B4 | 11.28 bc | 4.20 ab | 26.9 | 0.61 b |
处理 Treatment | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids |
---|---|---|---|
A | 12.44** | 0.35 | 82.10** |
B | 6.03** | 1.94 | 214.55** |
A×B | 1.42 | 5.92** | 19.44** |
Table 10 Results of variance analysis(F value)
处理 Treatment | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids |
---|---|---|---|
A | 12.44** | 0.35 | 82.10** |
B | 6.03** | 1.94 | 214.55** |
A×B | 1.42 | 5.92** | 19.44** |
处理 Treatment | 大小粒指数 Grain size uniformity index | 穗梗木栓化指数 Stem suberization index | 果形指数 Berry shape index | 穗质量 Bunch weight | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.32 |
A1B2 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
A1B3 | 0.38 | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 1.00 |
A1B4 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.66 |
A2B1 | 0 | 0 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.26 |
A2B2 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.41 |
A2B3 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.67 |
A2B4 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.64 |
Table 11 Dimensionless processing results of evaluation indexes
处理 Treatment | 大小粒指数 Grain size uniformity index | 穗梗木栓化指数 Stem suberization index | 果形指数 Berry shape index | 穗质量 Bunch weight | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.32 |
A1B2 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
A1B3 | 0.38 | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 1.00 |
A1B4 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.66 |
A2B1 | 0 | 0 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.26 |
A2B2 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.41 |
A2B3 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.67 |
A2B4 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.64 |
处理 Treatment | 面积 Area | 周长 Perimeter | | | Y | 综合排序 Comprehensive rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 0.883 | 4.443 | 0.536 | 0.562 | 0.301 | 8 |
A1B2 | 1.622 | 5.544 | 0.985 | 0.663 | 0.653 | 2 |
A1B3 | 1.646 | 5.615 | 1.000 | 0.656 | 0.656 | 1 |
A1B4 | 1.436 | 5.520 | 0.872 | 0.592 | 0.517 | 3 |
A2B1 | 0.791 | 3.966 | 0.481 | 0.632 | 0.304 | 7 |
A2B2 | 0.900 | 4.325 | 0.547 | 0.605 | 0.331 | 6 |
A2B3 | 1.125 | 4.897 | 0.683 | 0.589 | 0.403 | 5 |
A2B4 | 1.336 | 5.444 | 0.812 | 0.567 | 0.460 | 4 |
Table 12 Comprehensive evaluation results of radar charts of different treatments
处理 Treatment | 面积 Area | 周长 Perimeter | | | Y | 综合排序 Comprehensive rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 0.883 | 4.443 | 0.536 | 0.562 | 0.301 | 8 |
A1B2 | 1.622 | 5.544 | 0.985 | 0.663 | 0.653 | 2 |
A1B3 | 1.646 | 5.615 | 1.000 | 0.656 | 0.656 | 1 |
A1B4 | 1.436 | 5.520 | 0.872 | 0.592 | 0.517 | 3 |
A2B1 | 0.791 | 3.966 | 0.481 | 0.632 | 0.304 | 7 |
A2B2 | 0.900 | 4.325 | 0.547 | 0.605 | 0.331 | 6 |
A2B3 | 1.125 | 4.897 | 0.683 | 0.589 | 0.403 | 5 |
A2B4 | 1.336 | 5.444 | 0.812 | 0.567 | 0.460 | 4 |
[1] | International Organisation of Vine and Wine. Table and dried grapes[R/OL]. Paris: International Organisation of Vine and Wine, 2016. [2020-11-30]. http://www.fao.org/3/i7042e/i7042e.pdf . |
[2] | 顾克余, 周蓓蓓, 宋长年, 等. 植物生长调节剂及其在葡萄生产上的应用综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(7):13-16. |
GU K Y, ZHOU B B, SONG C N, et al. Plant growth regulator and its application in grape production[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(7):13-16.(in Chinese) | |
[3] | 李玲, 肖浪涛, 谭伟明. 现代植物生长调节剂技术手册[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2018. |
[4] | 张卫炜, 杨永珍. 氯吡脲的研究及应用进展[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2006, 27(5):36-40. |
ZHANG W W, YANG Y Z. Advances in research and application of forchlorfenuron[J]. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2006, 27(5):36-40.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 张钰. 无核葡萄—无核8611大粒化处理的试验研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2004. |
ZHANG Y. Study of treatment for large berry on seedless grape 8611[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2004. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 王婷. 植物生长调节剂对美人指葡萄浆果内源激素及果实品质影响研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012. |
WANG T. Research on effects of plant growth regulators on endogenous hormone and quality of Manicure Finger grape[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 王莎, 程大伟, 顾红, 等. 植物生长调节剂对‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄果实无核及品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(12):1675-1682. |
WANG S, CHENG D W, GU H, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on the seedless rate and fruit quality of ‘Shine Muscat’ grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(12):1675-1682.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 哈基姆, 张上隆, 陈大明, 等. CPPU、GA3处理对藤稔葡萄生物学性状及其生理基础效应的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31(1):92-94. |
ABDUL HA, ZHANG SL, CHEN DM, et al. Effects of CPPU, GA3 treatments on fruit development of Fujiminori grape and the possible mechanisms involved[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1998, 31(1):92-94.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 陶建敏, 章镇, 韩传光, 等. GA3与GA4+7及CPPU对巨峰葡萄果实发育的影响[J]. 长江果树, 2003(4):8-11. |
TAO J M, ZHANG Z, HAN C G, et al. The effect of GA3, GA4+7 and CPPU on the berry growth of Kyohogrape[J]. Changjiang Fruits, 2003(4):8-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 侯玉茹, 王宝刚, 冯晓元, 等. CPPU和GA3在葡萄中的残留动态及对果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(1):36-41. |
HOU Y R, WANG B G, FENG X Y, et al. Residues of plant growth regulators in fruit and regulation on fruit quality in Summer Black grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2012, 29(1):36-41.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 蒋爱丽, 李世诚, 杨天仪, 等. 设施早熟葡萄钾肥试验初报[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2006(2):13-14,17. |
JIANG A L, LI S C, YANG T Y, et al. Experiment of potassium fertilizer on earliness grapevine in greenhouse[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2006(2):13-14,17.(in Chinese) | |
[12] | 程杰山, 蒋爱丽, 奚晓军, 等. 施肥量对藤稔葡萄生理生化指标和光合作用的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2014, 43(4):117-118. |
CHENG J S, JIANG A L, XI X J, et al. Effects of fertilization on physiological and biochemical indexes and photosynjournal of Fujimino grape[J]. South China Fruits, 2014, 43(4):117-118.(in Chinese) | |
[13] | 李敬川, 刘俊, 武亚敬, 等. 不同施肥技术对土壤、葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2010, 28(3):34-39. |
LI J C, LIU J, WU Y J, et al. Effects of different fertilization techniques on soil and grape growth and fruit quality[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2010, 28(3):34-39.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 李春辉, 赵秀芳, 邵红雨, 等. 氮磷钾配施对藤稔葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(5):168-171. |
LI C H, ZHAO X F, SHAO H Y, et al. Effects of N, P, K on the yield and quality of the grape[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(5):168-171.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 浙江省农业厅. 葡萄全程标准化操作手册[M]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 2014. |
[16] | 唐莎莎. 无核白葡萄果实品质评价研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2013. |
TANG S S. The research on evaluation of fruit quality of the Thompson seedless grape[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 孙大利, 郑尊涛, 叶火春, 等. 氯吡脲在葡萄中的残留分析方法及消解动态[J]. 农药, 2011, 50(10):751-753. |
SUN D L, ZHENG Z T, YE H C, et al. Residue determination and degradation dynamics of forchlorfenuron in grape[J]. Agrochemicals, 2011, 50(10):751-753.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 陈勇, 陈潇凯, 李志远, 等. 具有评价结果唯一性特征的雷达图综合评价法[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2010, 30(12):1409-1412. |
CHEN Y, CHEN X K, LI Z Y, et al. Method of radar chart comprehensive evaluation with uniqueness feature[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010, 30(12):1409-1412.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 张文, 闫君, 彭涛, 等. UPLC-MS/MS测定葡萄中的生长调节剂及其中7种外源生长调节剂的残留消解动态[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(23):183-188. |
ZHANG W, YAN J, PENG T, et al. Determination of plant growth regulators and degradations of 7 kinds of exogenous growth regulators in grapes using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(23):183-188.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | HAN D H, LEE C H. The effects of GA3, CPPU and ABA applications on the quality of Kyoho(Vitisvinifera L. × V. labrusca L.) grape[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2004(653):193-197. |
[21] | RETAMALES J, BANGERTH F, COOPER T, et al. Effects of CPPU and GA3 on fruit quality of Sultanina table grape[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 1995(394):149-158. |
[22] | 李海燕, 张丽平, 王莉, 等. 2种植物生长调节剂对阳光玫瑰葡萄品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(4):419-426. |
LI H Y, ZHANG L P, WANG L, et al. Effects of two kinds of plant growth regulators on fruit quality of Shine Muscat grape[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(4):419-426.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 吴传雪. 配方施肥对美人指葡萄生长和果实品质及土壤理化性质的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2016. |
WU C X. Effects of formulated fertilization on growth and fruit quality and soil physicochemical properties of Manicure Finger grape[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | QI Zhenyu, CAI Licong, HU Weizhen, CAI Pan, ZHANG Longping, REN Yanyun, ZHOU Yanhong. Effects of reduced application of chemical fertilizers and ratio of base and topdressing fertilizers on yield and quality of garlic in integrated mode of water and fertilizer [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415. |
[2] | LIU Yanwei, ZHOU Xiao, YANG Qiliang, CHA Pinyuan. Effects of fertilization ratio and irrigation level on growth characteristics and incidence rate of Panax notoginseng [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1426-1435. |
[3] | LI Ju, XIE Bojie, WEI Shouhui, ZHANG Guobin, WU Yue, TANG Zhongqi, XIAO Xuemei, YU Jihua. Effects of combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on nutritional quality and volatile compounds of cauliflower [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1199-1211. |
[4] | XI Hui, LI Guolei, TAO An’an, GU Pin, HAN Dongdao, LI Na, CHEN Xijing. Effect of drip fertigation with organic liquid fertilizer on soil environment, fruit yield, quality, and economic benefits of citrus cv. beni madonna [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 670-677. |
[5] | WEN Mingxia, ZHANG Shunchang, WU Shaohui, HU Lipeng, WANG Peng, HUANG Bei. Effect of protein hydrolysate-based amino-acid fertilizers on fruit quality of Hongmeiren citrus hybrid [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 422-428. |
[6] | ZHANG Hui, CHE Xusheng, LYU Jian, GOU Zhaohui, QIN Qijie, LUO Jian, ZHANG Guobin. Effects of irrigation amount and nitrogen forms on production and nitrogen metabolism of broccoli [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 308-315. |
[7] | TAO Yuan, ZHOU Yuxi, HU Jilian. Research on decomposition of driving factors of chemical fertilizer application intensity in China and control paths [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1956-1970. |
[8] | CHEN Gui, LU Chenni, SHI Yanping, NI Xiongwei, CHENG Wangda, ZHANG Hongmei, WANG Baojun, ZHANG Liping, SUN Da. Effect of different controlled-release fertilizers with urea ammonium on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nutrients of rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 122-130. |
[9] | ZHENG Xusong, ZHONG Liequan, WANG Huifu, CHEN Fangjing, CHENG Liping, XU Qiqiang, LI Yang, ZHONG Xuhua, LYU Zhongxian. Demonstration on rice pests control by fertilizer regulation technique in different geographic rice growing areas of Zhejiang Province [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1656-1664. |
[10] | HAN Lijie, DONG Weixin, ZHANG Yuechen. Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on canopy structure, yield and grain quality of wheat [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 953-962. |
[11] | WANG Baojun, CHENG Wangda, CHEN Gui, SHEN Yaqiang, SHEN Meng, YUAN Ye, WANG Lei, ZHANG Hongmei. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer regulation on soil properties of paddy fields and rice yield with full amount returning of straw in Northern Zhejiang [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 183-190. |
[12] | NI Zhihua, SUN Wanchun, LIN Hui, ZHONG Hang, ZHU Weifeng, LU Ruohui, MA Junwei. Quality risk assessment and management of manure based organic fertilizers in Zhejiang [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 299-307. |
[13] | LI Meilin, CHEN Yutiao, HONG Xiaofu, QIAO Yuying, WANG Qingxia, CHEN Xijing, SHEN Alin, YU Man. Effects of nitrogen management on soil microbial community structure in paddy fields [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 308-316. |
[14] | WANG Yinglan, JIANG Xiong, JI Li, ZHANG Jingning, XIE Chengwei. Preparation of coal gangue fertilizer based on high-efficiency phosphate solubilizing bacteria and its application potential [J]. , 2020, 32(11): 2035-2041. |
[15] | LIN Rui, REN Haiying, AN Xiaoxiao, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Shuwen, QI Xingjiang. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on twig blight disease control and recovery of tree vigor in bayberry [J]. , 2019, 31(7): 1096-1104. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||