Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 790-800.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.04.15
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-02-28
Online:
2022-04-25
Published:
2022-04-28
CLC Number:
DONG Jie, ZENG Mi. Research on compensation standard for carbon sequestration afforestation based on carbon sequestration income and loss of wood income[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 790-800.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.04.15
时间 Time | 营造成本 Afforestation cost | 抚育成本 Tending cost | 管护成本 Maintenance cost | 设施成本 Facilities cost | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第一年First year | 10 665.0 | 1 267.0 | 1 582.5 | 2 357.5 | 15 872.0 |
第二年Second year | 3 572.5 | 676.0 | 476.5 | 956.0 | 5 681.0 |
第三年Third year | 2 358.0 | 395.0 | 286.5 | 316.5 | 3 356.0 |
合计Sum up | 16 595.5 | 2 338.0 | 2 345.5 | 3 630.0 | 24 909.0 |
Table 1 Cost of carbon sequestration afforestation with Chinese fur yuan·hm-2
时间 Time | 营造成本 Afforestation cost | 抚育成本 Tending cost | 管护成本 Maintenance cost | 设施成本 Facilities cost | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第一年First year | 10 665.0 | 1 267.0 | 1 582.5 | 2 357.5 | 15 872.0 |
第二年Second year | 3 572.5 | 676.0 | 476.5 | 956.0 | 5 681.0 |
第三年Third year | 2 358.0 | 395.0 | 286.5 | 316.5 | 3 356.0 |
合计Sum up | 16 595.5 | 2 338.0 | 2 345.5 | 3 630.0 | 24 909.0 |
t/a | f(w)/(m3·hm-2) | f(c)/(t·hm-2) | Vw/(yuan·hm-2) | Vc/(yuan·hm-2) | Vz/(yuan·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 0.34 | 0.16 | -319 269.42 | 125.01 | -319 144.41 |
4 | 3.16 | 1.47 | -152 425.93 | 574.54 | -151 851.39 |
6 | 10.28 | 4.77 | -84 295.21 | 1 223.88 | -83 071.33 |
8 | 21.82 | 10.13 | -41 771.40 | 1 918.33 | -39 853.07 |
10 | 36.84 | 17.11 | -12 046.41 | 2 557.25 | -9 489.16 |
12 | 54.03 | 25.09 | 8 913.49 | 3 092.31 | 12 005.80 |
4 | 72.11 | 33.48 | 23 192.94 | 3 510.28 | 26 703.22 |
16 | 90.08 | 41.83 | 32 296.77 | 3 817.56 | 36 114.33 |
18 | 107.21 | 49.78 | 37 449.68 | 4 029.55 | 41 479.23 |
20 | 123.05 | 57.14 | 39 661.16 | 4 164.27 | 43 825.43 |
22 | 137.36 | 63.78 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
24 | 150.05 | 69.67 | 38 349.20 | 4 269.07 | 42 618.27 |
26 | 161.16 | 74.83 | 35 960.98 | 4 266.69 | 40 227.67 |
28 | 170.77 | 79.29 | 32 952.00 | 4 241.75 | 37 193.75 |
30 | 179.01 | 83.12 | 29 593.42 | 4 201.81 | 33 795.23 |
Table 2 Economic benefits of carbon sequestration afforestation with Chinese fur
t/a | f(w)/(m3·hm-2) | f(c)/(t·hm-2) | Vw/(yuan·hm-2) | Vc/(yuan·hm-2) | Vz/(yuan·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 0.34 | 0.16 | -319 269.42 | 125.01 | -319 144.41 |
4 | 3.16 | 1.47 | -152 425.93 | 574.54 | -151 851.39 |
6 | 10.28 | 4.77 | -84 295.21 | 1 223.88 | -83 071.33 |
8 | 21.82 | 10.13 | -41 771.40 | 1 918.33 | -39 853.07 |
10 | 36.84 | 17.11 | -12 046.41 | 2 557.25 | -9 489.16 |
12 | 54.03 | 25.09 | 8 913.49 | 3 092.31 | 12 005.80 |
4 | 72.11 | 33.48 | 23 192.94 | 3 510.28 | 26 703.22 |
16 | 90.08 | 41.83 | 32 296.77 | 3 817.56 | 36 114.33 |
18 | 107.21 | 49.78 | 37 449.68 | 4 029.55 | 41 479.23 |
20 | 123.05 | 57.14 | 39 661.16 | 4 164.27 | 43 825.43 |
22 | 137.36 | 63.78 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
24 | 150.05 | 69.67 | 38 349.20 | 4 269.07 | 42 618.27 |
26 | 161.16 | 74.83 | 35 960.98 | 4 266.69 | 40 227.67 |
28 | 170.77 | 79.29 | 32 952.00 | 4 241.75 | 37 193.75 |
30 | 179.01 | 83.12 | 29 593.42 | 4 201.81 | 33 795.23 |
Pw/(yuan· m-3) | T/a | Vw/(yuan· hm-2) | Vc/(yuan· hm-2) | Vz/(yuan· hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
600 | 28 | -16 669.35 | 4 241.75 | -12 427.60 |
900 | 22 | 10 539.96 | 4 239.08 | 14 779.04 |
1 200* | 22 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
1 500 | 20 | 69 783.29 | 4 164.27 | 73 947.56 |
1 800 | 20 | 99 905.41 | 4 164.27 | 104 069.68 |
Table 3 Economic benefits of carbon sequestration afforestation with Chinese fur under different wood prices
Pw/(yuan· m-3) | T/a | Vw/(yuan· hm-2) | Vc/(yuan· hm-2) | Vz/(yuan· hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
600 | 28 | -16 669.35 | 4 241.75 | -12 427.60 |
900 | 22 | 10 539.96 | 4 239.08 | 14 779.04 |
1 200* | 22 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
1 500 | 20 | 69 783.29 | 4 164.27 | 73 947.56 |
1 800 | 20 | 99 905.41 | 4 164.27 | 104 069.68 |
Pc/(yuan· t-1) | T/a | Vw/(yuan· hm-2) | Vc/(yuan· hm-2) | Vz/(yuan· hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
7.23 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 581.35 | 40 328.28 |
26.36 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 2 119.54 | 41 866.47 |
52.72* | 22 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
79.07 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 6 357.81 | 46 104.74 |
98.20 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 7 896.01 | 47 642.94 |
Table 4 Economic benefits of carbon sequestration afforestation with Chinese fur under different carbon prices
Pc/(yuan· t-1) | T/a | Vw/(yuan· hm-2) | Vc/(yuan· hm-2) | Vz/(yuan· hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
7.23 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 581.35 | 40 328.28 |
26.36 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 2 119.54 | 41 866.47 |
52.72* | 22 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
79.07 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 6 357.81 | 46 104.74 |
98.20 | 22 | 39 746.93 | 7 896.01 | 47 642.94 |
r/% | T/a | Vw/(yuan· hm-2) | Vc/(yuan· hm-2) | Vz/(yuan· hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 24 | 140 417.56 | 112 334.05 | 252 751.61 |
3 | 22 | 72 626.48 | 5 824.62 | 78 451.11 |
4* | 22 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
5 | 20 | 21 173.46 | 3 227.40 | 24 400.85 |
6 | 20 | 9 245.67 | 2 602.50 | 11 848.17 |
Table 5 Economic benefits of carbon sequestration afforestation with Chinese fur under different interest rates
r/% | T/a | Vw/(yuan· hm-2) | Vc/(yuan· hm-2) | Vz/(yuan· hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 24 | 140 417.56 | 112 334.05 | 252 751.61 |
3 | 22 | 72 626.48 | 5 824.62 | 78 451.11 |
4* | 22 | 39 746.93 | 4 239.08 | 43 986.01 |
5 | 20 | 21 173.46 | 3 227.40 | 24 400.85 |
6 | 20 | 9 245.67 | 2 602.50 | 11 848.17 |
[1] |
HURRELL A, SENGUPTA S. Emerging powers, North-South relations and global climate politics[J]. International Affairs, 2012, 88(3): 463-484.
DOI URL |
[2] | 李怒云, 陆霁. 林业碳汇与碳税制度设计之我见[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(5): 110-113. |
LI N Y, LU J. Study on forestry carbon and carbon tax system[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(5): 110-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 曹先磊, 张颖, 石小亮, 等. 碳交易视角下森林碳汇生态补偿优化管理研究进展[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(4): 430-435. |
CAO X L, ZHANG Y, SHI X L, et al. Research progress on optimal management of ecological compensation of forest carbon sequestration from perspective of carbon trading[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2017, 33(4): 430-435. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 李怒云, 袁金鸿. 林业碳汇自愿交易的中国样本: 创建碳汇交易体系实现生态产品货币化[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015(5): 1-7. |
LI N Y, YUAN J H. Chinese sample of forestry carbon voluntary trade: set up carbon trade system and monetize ecological products[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2015(5): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 杨帆, 曾维忠, 张维康, 等. 林农森林碳汇项目持续参与意愿及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(7): 138-147. |
YANG F, ZENG W Z, ZHANG W K, et al. Foresters’ constant participation willingness and affecting factors in forest carbon sequestration project[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(7): 138-147. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 曹先磊, 张颖, 石小亮, 等. 竹子造林CCER项目碳汇价值动态评估及敏感性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(2): 247-256. |
CAO X L, ZHANG Y, SHI X L, et al. Study on the dynamic value of carbon sequestration of bamboo forestation project in CCER market and its sensitivity[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(2): 247-256. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 于金娜. 黄土高原地区造林补贴标准研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014. |
YU J N. Study on afforestation subsidy in Loess Plateau[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 于金娜, 姚顺波. 基于碳汇效益视角的最优退耕还林补贴标准研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(7): 34-39. |
YU J N, YAO S B. Optimal subsidy of SLCP in China from the perspective of carbon sequestration benefit[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(7): 34-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 杨浩, 曾圣丰, 曾维忠, 等. 基于希克斯分析法的中国森林碳汇造林生态补偿: 以“放牧地-碳汇林地”土地用途转变为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(9): 221-227. |
YANG H, ZENG S F, ZENG W Z, et al. Ecological compensation of forest carbon sequestration in China based on Hicks analysis: a case study of the land use change from grazing to planting carbon sequestration forest[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2016, 36(9): 221-227. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 黄宰胜, 陈治淇, 陈钦. 林农碳汇林经营受偿意愿影响因素分析: 基于计划行为理论[J]. 林业经济, 2017, 39(3): 46-52. |
HUANG Z S, CHEN Z Q, CHEN Q. Analysis on influencing factors of the willingness to accept compensation of carbon sinks forest management: based on the theory of planned behavior[J]. Forestry Economics, 2017, 39(3): 46-52. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 张巍. 区域碳补偿标准及额度研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(24): 55-58. |
ZHANG W. Research on regional carbon compensation standards and amounts[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2019, 35(24): 55-58. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 曹先磊. 碳交易视角下人工造林固碳效应价值评价研究: 以迭部县为例[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2018. |
CAO X L. Study on the effects of carbon sequestration of artificial afforestation and its value evaluation under the carbon trading perspective: a case study in Diebu County[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 薄其皇. 基于机会成本的森林生态补偿标准研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015. |
BO Q H. Study on the standard of forest eco-compensation based on opportunity cost[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 朱臻, 沈月琴, 张耀启, 等. 碳汇经营目标下的林地期望价值变化及碳供给: 基于杉木裸地造林假设研究[J]. 林业科学, 2012(11): 112-116. |
ZHU Z, SHEN Y Q, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Change of forestland expected value and carbon supply in the objective of carbon sequestration: based on the Chinese fir plantation in bared land[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012(11): 112-116. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 任腾腾, 徐秀英. 碳交易情景下林地效益可能的变化分析:基于农户杉木地块调查分析[J]. 生态经济, 2013(2):158-161. |
REN T T, XU X Y. The analysis of forestland benefit possible changes of different types in carbon trading situation: based on Chinese fir plot investigation of farmer[J]. Ecological Economy, 2013(2):158-161. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 林卓, 吴承祯, 洪伟, 等. 杉木人工林碳汇木材复合经济收益分析及最优轮伐期确定: 基于时间序列预测模型[J]. 林业科学, 2016(10): 134-145. |
LIN Z, WU C Z, HONG W, et al. Economic benefits analysis of carbon sequestration and timber and determination of optimal rotation period for a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation: based on time series model[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016(10): 134-145. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 王正淑, 王继军, 刘佳. 基于碳汇的县南沟流域退耕林地补偿标准研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 779-788. |
WANG Z S, WANG J J, LIU J. Study on the compensation standard of returning farmland to forest in Xiannangou watershed from the perspective of carbon sink[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(5): 779-788. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] |
RICHARDS K R, STOKES C. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research[J]. Climatic Change, 2004, 63(1/2): 1-48.
DOI URL |
[19] | 沈月琴, 王小玲, 王枫, 等. 农户经营杉木林的碳汇供给及其影响因素[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(8): 42-47. |
SHEN Y Q, WANG X L, WANG F, et al. Carbon sequestration supply and its influencing factors for farmers operating fir in Chinese southern collective forest zone[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(8): 42-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 陈则生. 杉木人工林经济成熟龄的研究[J]. 华东森林经理, 2004, 18(3): 1-5. |
CHEN Z S. Study on the economic harvesting age for plantation Chinese fir[J]. East China Forest Management, 2004, 18(3): 1-5. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 王小玲, 沈月琴, 朱臻. 考虑碳汇收益的林地期望值最大化及其敏感性分析: 以杉木和马尾松为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(4): 143-148. |
WANG X L, SHEN Y Q, ZHU Z. The maximization of land expectation value (LEV) considering carbon benefits and its sensitivity analysis: take Chinese fir and Masson pine for example[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 37(4): 143-148. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] |
HARTMAN R. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has valuea[J]. Economic Inquiry, 1976, 14(1): 52-58.
DOI URL |
[23] | FAUSTMANN M. Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry[M]//Economics of Forestry. London:Routledge, 2018: 1-40. |
[24] | 朱臻, 沈月琴, 吴伟光, 等. 碳汇目标下农户森林经营最优决策及碳汇供给能力: 基于浙江和江西两省调查[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(8): 2577-2585. |
ZHU Z, SHEN Y Q, WU W G, et al. Household optimal forest management decision and carbon supply: case from Zhejiang and Jiangxi Provinces[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(8): 2577-2585. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[25] | 林国庆, 柳婉郁. 考量碳吸存效益之杉木造林奖励金分析[J]. 农业经济, 2006(79):71-102. |
LIN K C, LIU W Y. An analysis of optimal afforestation subsidy for Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2006(79):71-102. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] |
ALAVALAPATI J R R, STAINBACK G A, CARTER D R. Restoration of the longleaf pine ecosystem on private lands in the US South: an ecological economic analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(3): 411-419.
DOI URL |
[1] | CUI Ningbo, SHENG Shiyu. Quantitative research on ecological compensation for cultivated land in black soil region in northeast China from perspective of food security [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1759-1769. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||