Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 1990-1999.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231009
• Crop Seience • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Yutiao(), YAN Chuan, HONG Xiaofu, SONG Jiayu(
)
Received:
2023-08-24
Online:
2024-09-25
Published:
2024-09-30
CLC Number:
CHEN Yutiao, YAN Chuan, HONG Xiaofu, SONG Jiayu. Effects of submergence at tillering stage on growth characters, yield formation and potassium uptake of japonica inbred rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 1990-1999.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231009
Fig.1 Survival rate of japonica inbred rice under treatments “*” indicate significant difference at P<0.05; “ns” indicate that there is no significant difference at P≥0.05. S, Main treatment of submergence; K, Potassium treatment; S×K, Interaction of submergence and potassium treatment. The same as below.
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/ (g·m-2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/m-2 | 每穗颖花数 Spikelets number per panicle | 单位面积颖花数 Spikelets number per unit area/m-2 | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK-K0 | 499.2±148.0 a | 404.8±11.7 a | 165.4±6.3 a | 67 036±3 877 a | 20.8±0.16 a | 36.2±11.7 a |
CK-K180 | 369.9±179.0 a | 440.5±31.6 a | 160.2±12.2 a | 70 735±5 896 a | 19.8±0.71 a | 24.2±11.2 a |
ST-K0 | 364.2±124.9 a | 214.3±44.7 b | 173.9±5.9 a | 36 768±6 893 b | 21.0±0.36 a | 44.5±7.9 a |
ST-K180 | 369.4± 24.4 a | 279.8±25.9 b | 159.9±19.4 a | 44 262±5 261 b | 20.5±0.70 a | 41.7±4.5 a |
Table 1 Yield and yield components of japonica inbred rice under treatments
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/ (g·m-2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/m-2 | 每穗颖花数 Spikelets number per panicle | 单位面积颖花数 Spikelets number per unit area/m-2 | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK-K0 | 499.2±148.0 a | 404.8±11.7 a | 165.4±6.3 a | 67 036±3 877 a | 20.8±0.16 a | 36.2±11.7 a |
CK-K180 | 369.9±179.0 a | 440.5±31.6 a | 160.2±12.2 a | 70 735±5 896 a | 19.8±0.71 a | 24.2±11.2 a |
ST-K0 | 364.2±124.9 a | 214.3±44.7 b | 173.9±5.9 a | 36 768±6 893 b | 21.0±0.36 a | 44.5±7.9 a |
ST-K180 | 369.4± 24.4 a | 279.8±25.9 b | 159.9±19.4 a | 44 262±5 261 b | 20.5±0.70 a | 41.7±4.5 a |
Fig.2 Tiller number of japonica inbred rice under treatments Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05 within treatments at the same sampling time. BS, One day before submergence; AS, One day after de-submergence; MS, Maturity stage. The same as in Fig. 3.
Fig.4 Shoot elongation rate during submergence of japonica inbred rice under treatments Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05.
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的地上部干重 Aboveground dry weight at different period/(g·m-2) | 不同时期的生长速率 Growth rate at different period/(g·m-2·d-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BS | AS | MS | BS—AS | AS—MS | |
CK-K0 | 13.1±1.1 a | 96.2±22.2 a | 2 536.3±39.8 a | 5.5±1.5 a | 22.1±0.2 a |
CK-K180 | 19.1±2.3 a | 98.2±6.7 a | 2 563.7±245.3 a | 5.3±0.5 a | 22.4±2.1 a |
ST-K0 | 15.5±2.3 a | 39.4±7.1 b | 1 434.5±272.2 b | 1.6±0.4 b | 12.7±2.3 b |
ST-K180 | 15.5±1.1 a | 51.3±5.3 b | 1 707.1±169.0 b | 2.4±0.5 b | 15.0±1.5 b |
Table 2 Above ground dry weight and growth rate of japonica inbred rice under treatments
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的地上部干重 Aboveground dry weight at different period/(g·m-2) | 不同时期的生长速率 Growth rate at different period/(g·m-2·d-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BS | AS | MS | BS—AS | AS—MS | |
CK-K0 | 13.1±1.1 a | 96.2±22.2 a | 2 536.3±39.8 a | 5.5±1.5 a | 22.1±0.2 a |
CK-K180 | 19.1±2.3 a | 98.2±6.7 a | 2 563.7±245.3 a | 5.3±0.5 a | 22.4±2.1 a |
ST-K0 | 15.5±2.3 a | 39.4±7.1 b | 1 434.5±272.2 b | 1.6±0.4 b | 12.7±2.3 b |
ST-K180 | 15.5±1.1 a | 51.3±5.3 b | 1 707.1±169.0 b | 2.4±0.5 b | 15.0±1.5 b |
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的钾含量Potassium content at different time | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BS | AS | MS | |||
秸秆Straw | 饱粒Filled grains | 秕粒+枝梗Unfilled grains+branch | |||
CK-K0 | 18.1±1.1 b | 22.4±0.9 b | 10.7±0.3 ab | 3.8±0.1 a | 6.9±0.3 a |
CK-K180 | 38.6±0.8 a | 26.4±1.9 a | 11.9±0.3 a | 4.2±0.2 a | 6.9±0.1 a |
ST-K0 | 17.2±0.3 b | 21.8±0.6 b | 10.0±0.6 b | 4.0±0.1 a | 6.4±0.4 a |
ST-K180 | 33.3±6.5 a | 26.9±0.6 a | 10.9±0.2 ab | 4.3±0.2 a | 6.6±0.3 a |
Table 3 Potassium content of japonica inbred rice under treatments at different period mg·g-1
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的钾含量Potassium content at different time | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BS | AS | MS | |||
秸秆Straw | 饱粒Filled grains | 秕粒+枝梗Unfilled grains+branch | |||
CK-K0 | 18.1±1.1 b | 22.4±0.9 b | 10.7±0.3 ab | 3.8±0.1 a | 6.9±0.3 a |
CK-K180 | 38.6±0.8 a | 26.4±1.9 a | 11.9±0.3 a | 4.2±0.2 a | 6.9±0.1 a |
ST-K0 | 17.2±0.3 b | 21.8±0.6 b | 10.0±0.6 b | 4.0±0.1 a | 6.4±0.4 a |
ST-K180 | 33.3±6.5 a | 26.9±0.6 a | 10.9±0.2 ab | 4.3±0.2 a | 6.6±0.3 a |
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的钾素积累量 Potassium accumulation at different period | ||
---|---|---|---|
BS | AS | MS | |
CK-K0 | 0.24±0.02 c | 1.66±0.86 ab | 22.5±0.7 a |
CK-K180 | 0.73±0.08 a | 1.94±0.79 a | 25.9±1.9 a |
ST-K0 | 0.27±0.06 c | 0.62±0.60 c | 11.4±1.8 b |
ST-K180 | 0.50±0.03 b | 1.04±0.64 bc | 15.4±1.9 b |
Table 4 Potassium accumulation of japonica inbred rice under treatments at different period g·m-2
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的钾素积累量 Potassium accumulation at different period | ||
---|---|---|---|
BS | AS | MS | |
CK-K0 | 0.24±0.02 c | 1.66±0.86 ab | 22.5±0.7 a |
CK-K180 | 0.73±0.08 a | 1.94±0.79 a | 25.9±1.9 a |
ST-K0 | 0.27±0.06 c | 0.62±0.60 c | 11.4±1.8 b |
ST-K180 | 0.50±0.03 b | 1.04±0.64 bc | 15.4±1.9 b |
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的钾素积累速率 Potassium accumulatin rate at different period | |
---|---|---|
BS—AS | AS—MS | |
CK-K0 | 0.09±0.03 a | 0.19±0.01 a |
CK-K180 | 0.08±0.01 a | 0.22±0.02 a |
ST-K0 | 0.02±0.01 b | 0.10±0.02 b |
ST-K180 | 0.04±0.01 ab | 0.13±0.02 b |
Table 5 Potassium accumulation rate of japonica inbred rice under treatments at different period g·m-2·d-1
处理 Treatment | 不同时期的钾素积累速率 Potassium accumulatin rate at different period | |
---|---|---|
BS—AS | AS—MS | |
CK-K0 | 0.09±0.03 a | 0.19±0.01 a |
CK-K180 | 0.08±0.01 a | 0.22±0.02 a |
ST-K0 | 0.02±0.01 b | 0.10±0.02 b |
ST-K180 | 0.04±0.01 ab | 0.13±0.02 b |
[1] | GONZAGA Z J C, CARANDANG J, SANCHEZ D L, et al. Mapping additional QTLs from FR13A to increase submergence tolerance in rice beyond SUB1[J]. Euphytica, 2016, 209(3): 627-636. |
[2] | 杨建莹, 霍治国, 吴立, 等. 西南地区水稻洪涝等级评价指标构建及风险分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(16): 135-144. |
YANG J Y, HUO Z G, WU L, et al. Evaluation level construction and analysis of risk on rice flood in Southwest China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(16): 135-144. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 晏军, 吴启侠, 朱建强, 等. 拔节期杂交中稻对淹水胁迫的响应及指示性指标探讨[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(1): 17-25. |
YAN J, WU Q X, ZHU J Q, et al. Response of hybrid mid-season rice to flooding and discussion of indicative index at the jointing stage[J]. China Rice, 2017, 23(1): 17-25. (in Chinese)
DOI |
|
[4] | 刘建. 关键生育期淹水处理组胁迫对水稻生长的影响及应用研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2019. |
LIU J. Research on effects of waterlogging on rice growth at critical growing stage and its application[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | XIANG J, WU H, ZHANG Y P, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of gibberellin-and paclobutrazol-treated rice seedlings under submergence[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2017, 18(10): 2225. |
[6] | SAKAGAMI J I, JOHO Y, ITO O. Contrasting physiological responses by cultivars of Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima to prolonged submergence[J]. Annals of Botany, 2009, 103(2): 171-180. |
[7] |
MITTLER R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2002, 7(9): 405-410.
DOI PMID |
[8] | BIN RAHMAN A N M R, ZHANG J H. Flood and drought tolerance in rice: opposite butmaycoexist[J]. Food and Energy Security, 2016, 5(2): 76-88. |
[9] | 郝红威. 耐淹水稻种质资源的利用及淹水对水稻碳水化合物积累和转化的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2012. |
HAO H W. The utilization of tolerant rice germplasm and the influence of submergence on carbohydrate accumulation and transformation[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | ELLA E S, DIONISIO-SESE M L, ISMAIL A M. Seed pre-treatment in rice reduces damage, enhances carbohydrate mobilization and improves emergence and seedling establishment under flooded conditions[J]. AoB PLANTS, 2011, 2011: plr007. |
[11] | ELLA E S, ISMAIL A M. Seedling nutrient status before submergence affects survival after submergence in rice[J]. Crop Science, 2006, 46(4): 1673-1681. |
[12] | ELLA E, DIONISIO-SESE M, ISMAIL A. Application of silica before sowing negatively affects growth and survival of rice following submergence[J]. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 2011, 36: 1-11. |
[13] | GAUTAM P, LAL B, RAJA R, et al. Effect of nutrient application and water turbidity on submergence tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Annals of Applied Biology, 2015, 166(1): 90-104. |
[14] | BEHERA U K, SINGH S, SARANGI S K, et al. Post-submergence nitrogen fertilizer management for enhancing rainfed lowland rice productivity in eastern India[J]. International Journal of Bio-Resource and Stress Management, 2019, 10(4): 419-428. |
[15] | 薛欣欣. 水稻钾素营养特性及钾肥高效施用技术研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016. |
XUE X X. Study on the characteristics of potassium nutrition and high-efficient application technologies of potassium fertilizer in rice[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] |
王峰, 叶静, 高敬文, 等. 外源增钾缓解铵胁迫下小麦根系受抑[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 1923-1933.
DOI |
WANG F, YE J, GAO J W, et al. Potassium alleviates inhibition of ammonium stress on wheat root[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(11): 1923-1933. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[17] | YOUSRA M, AKHTAR J, SAQIB Z A, et al. Effect of potassium application on ammonium nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.) under salt stress[J]. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50: 43-48. |
[18] | 谷贺贺, 李静, 张洋洋, 等. 钾肥与我国主要作物品质关系的整合分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(10): 1749-1757. |
GU H H, LI J, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between potassium fertilizer and the quality of main crops in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(10): 1749-1757. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | GAUTAM P, LAL B, TRIPATHI R, et al. Beneficial effects of potassium application in improving submergence tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, 128: 18-30. |
[20] | 周玲红, 黄晶, 王伯仁, 等. 南方酸化红壤钾素淋溶对施石灰的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(2): 457-467. |
ZHOU L H, HUANG J, WANG B R, et al. Response of acidifing red soil to liming in potassium leaching in South China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(2): 457-467. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | BRAR S K, MAHAL S S, BRAR A S, et al. Transplanting time and seedling age affect water productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 115: 217-222. |
[22] | 宁金花, 霍治国, 陆魁东, 等. 不同生育期淹涝胁迫对杂交稻形态特征和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2013, 34(6): 678-684. |
NING J H, HUO Z G, LU K D, et al. Effects of water logging on morphological characteristics and yield of hybrid rice during growth stages[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2013, 34(6): 678-684. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | BAILEY-SERRES J, VOESENEK L A. Life in the balance: a signaling network controlling survival of flooding[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2010, 13(5): 489-494. |
[24] | HUANG S H, JIA Y Y, LIU P, et al. Effect of ultrasonic seed treatment on rice seedlings under waterlogging stress[J]. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2020, 80(4): 561-571. |
[25] | KATO Y, COLLARD B C Y, SEPTININGSIH E M, et al. Physiological analyses of traits associated with tolerance of long-term partial submergence in rice[J]. AoB PLANTS, 2014, 6: plu058. |
[26] | DAS K K, PANDA D, SARKAR R K, et al. Submergence tolerance in relation to variable floodwater conditions in rice[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2009, 66(3): 425-434. |
[27] | ZHU G L, CHEN Y T, ELLA E S, et al. Mechanisms associated with tiller suppression under stagnant flooding in rice[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2019, 205(2): 235-247. |
[28] | GAUTAM P, LAL B, RAJA R, et al. Effect of simulated flash flooding on rice and its recovery after flooding with nutrient management strategies[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 77: 250-256. |
[29] | BANERJEE A, ROYCHOUDHURY A. Physiological and genetic basis of submergence tolerance in rice[M]// ROYCHOUDHURY A. Rice research for quality improvement:genomics and genetic engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2020: 399-406. |
[30] | 张晓龙, 张玉平, 高德才, 等. 不同施肥模式对旱地土壤氮磷钾径流流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(6): 36-40. |
ZHANG X L, ZHANG Y P, GAO D C, et al. Effects of different kinds of fertilization modes on soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium runoff in dryland field[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(6): 36-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 高杨, 宋付朋, 马富亮, 等. 模拟降雨条件下3种类型土壤氮磷钾养分流失量的比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(2): 15-18. |
GAO Y, SONG F P, MA F L, et al. Comparison of loss amount of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in three types of soil under simulated rainfall[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(2): 15-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | ZHEN F X, LIU Y J, ALI I, et al. Short-term heat stress at booting stage inhibited nitrogen remobilization to grain in rice[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2020, 2: 100066. |
[33] | 钟楚. 水分胁迫下水稻氮素利用及其适应机理[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2018. |
ZHONG C. Nitrogen utilization and its adaptive mechanism of rice (Oryza Sativa L.) under water stress[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 等. 五年定位试验钾肥用量对双季稻产量和施钾效应的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3): 598-605. |
LU Y H, LIAO Y L, NIE J, et al. Effect of potassium rates on rice yields and potassium application efficiency in double-rice cropping system under a 5-year located experiment[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(3): 598-605. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 郭鑫年, 蒙静, 田旭东, 等. 钾肥用量对水稻钾素分配累积、钾肥利用效率及平衡的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(6): 154-160. |
GUO X N, MENG J, TIAN X D, et al. Effects of potassium application on the distribution, utilization efficiency of potassium in rice and soil potassium balance[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(6): 154-160. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 魏媛媛, 杜春颖, 刘梦红, 等. 施钾量及配比对寒地水稻干物质积累量及产量的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2019, 49(5): 5-12. |
WEI Y Y, DU C Y, LIU M H, et al. Effects of potassium application and ratio on dry matter accumulation and yield of rice in cold region[J]. North Rice, 2019, 49(5): 5-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 陈琛, 舒小伟, 徐杰姣, 等. 不同库容群体水稻磷、钾养分吸收利用的基本特点[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 41(4): 9-15. |
CHEN C, SHU X W, XU J J, et al. Fundamental features of P, K absorption and utilization in rice populations with different sink capacity[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University(Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2020, 41(4): 9-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | HUANG L Y, YANG D S, LI X X, et al. Coordination of high grain yield and high nitrogen use efficiency through large sink size and high post-heading source capacity in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 233: 49-58. |
[1] | WANG Tie, HUANG Shengjia, YANG Youting, TAN Liping, QIU Xia, DONG Tiantian, LI Sichen, SUN Guochao, XIONG Bo, WANG Jun, WANG Zhihui. Effects of different interstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Yuanxiaochun citrus [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 413-421. |
[2] | ZHU Shenlong, WANG Weilong, YU Xiaomin, JIN Hangxia, FU Yulou, QIU Yueheng. Effect of different nursery substrates on growth of olive container-seedlings [J]. , 2017, 29(5): 701-707. |
[3] | ZHANG Ying\|hu, CHEN He, CHEN Jian, TAO Hong, QIAO Hai\|long, ZANG Hui, LUAN Hai\|ye, SHEN Hui\|quan*. Analysis of yield and yield components of barley varieties (lines) in coastal area in Jiangsu during 2007 to 2014#br# [J]. , 2015, 27(9): 1510-. |
[4] | LI Xiang\|long,ZHANG Xiao\|dong,ZHANG Zhong\|bao,ZHANG Li\|quan,WU Zhong\|yi*. Effects of density on the ear characteristics and yield component factors of different maize hybrids [J]. , 2015, 27(5): 713-. |
[5] | ZHENG Chun-fang;CHEN Chen;PENG Yi-quan;JI De-wei;YU Jun-qi;CHEN Shao-bo;XIE Qi-lang;ZENG Guo;*;LIU Wei-cheng;*. Effects of irrigation with saline aquaculture wastewater on growth and quality of Suaeda salsa and Salicornia bigelovii [J]. , 2012, 24(4): 0-669. |
[6] | XU Chun-mei;ZHOU Chang-nan;ZHENG Gen-shen;WANG Dan-ying;Hu Pei-song;ZHANG Xiu-fu;*. Analysis on matter production characteristics under different nitrogen fertilizer amount and planting densities of super indica rice cv. Zhongjiazao 17 [J]. , 2010, 22(4): 0-508. |
[7] | WANG Dan-ying;ZHANG Xiu-fu;*;ZHOU Chang-nan;ZHENG Gen-sheng;ZHANG Gen-xian;XU Xi-hu;JIN Bing-hua;ZHANG Wen-song;CHEN Hong-wei;LI Jin. Grain yield difference investigation and reasonable planting density analysis of rice production in Zhejing Province [J]. , 2010, 22(3): 0-336. |
[8] | WANG Zhi-gang;WANG Lei;LIAO Xi—yuan*. Characteristic analysis on yield components of the mediuln indica rice from regional trials in China [J]. , 2009, 21(4): 0-349. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||