Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 2089-2098.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231121
• Food Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Gensheng1(), LI Sijin1, TIAN Yang1, HAN Bing1, XIE Chunli1, FEI Yingmin2,*(
)
Received:
2023-09-18
Online:
2024-09-25
Published:
2024-09-30
CLC Number:
ZHANG Gensheng, LI Sijin, TIAN Yang, HAN Bing, XIE Chunli, FEI Yingmin. Study on water enzymatic extraction of pine seed oil and enzymatic demulsification technology[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2089-2098.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231121
水平 Level | 因素Factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(A)时间Time/h | (B)温度Temperature/℃ | (C)pH值pH value | (D)加酶量Enzyme dosage/(U·g-1) | |
-1 | 2 | 50 | 10 | 4 500 |
0 | 3 | 55 | 11 | 5 000 |
1 | 4 | 60 | 12 | 5 500 |
Table 1 Factors and levels in Box-Behnken experimental design
水平 Level | 因素Factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(A)时间Time/h | (B)温度Temperature/℃ | (C)pH值pH value | (D)加酶量Enzyme dosage/(U·g-1) | |
-1 | 2 | 50 | 10 | 4 500 |
0 | 3 | 55 | 11 | 5 000 |
1 | 4 | 60 | 12 | 5 500 |
种类 Type | 加酶量 Enzyme dosage/(U·g-1) | pH值 pH value | 温度 Temperature/℃ | 时间 Time/h | 提油率 Oil extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
纤维素酶Cellulase | 5 000 | 4.5~6.5 | 45~65 | 3 | 51.10±0.6 |
果胶酶Pectinase | 5 000 | 3~5 | 45~55 | 3 | 50.23±1.2 |
木瓜蛋白酶Papain | 5 000 | 6~8 | 40~55 | 3 | 53.16±0.3 |
酸性蛋白酶Acid protease | 5 000 | 2.5~3.5 | 40~45 | 3 | 53.99±1.7 |
中性蛋白酶Neutral protease | 5 000 | 6.5~7.5 | 40~50 | 3 | 57.58±0.7 |
碱性蛋白酶Alkaline protease | 5 000 | 10~12 | 45~55 | 3 | 62.77±0.8 |
Table 2 Optimum enzyme conditions and oil extraction rate
种类 Type | 加酶量 Enzyme dosage/(U·g-1) | pH值 pH value | 温度 Temperature/℃ | 时间 Time/h | 提油率 Oil extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
纤维素酶Cellulase | 5 000 | 4.5~6.5 | 45~65 | 3 | 51.10±0.6 |
果胶酶Pectinase | 5 000 | 3~5 | 45~55 | 3 | 50.23±1.2 |
木瓜蛋白酶Papain | 5 000 | 6~8 | 40~55 | 3 | 53.16±0.3 |
酸性蛋白酶Acid protease | 5 000 | 2.5~3.5 | 40~45 | 3 | 53.99±1.7 |
中性蛋白酶Neutral protease | 5 000 | 6.5~7.5 | 40~50 | 3 | 57.58±0.7 |
碱性蛋白酶Alkaline protease | 5 000 | 10~12 | 45~55 | 3 | 62.77±0.8 |
Fig.1 Effects of enzymatic hydrolysis time, enzymatic hydrolysis temperature, enzymatic hydrolysis pH value and enzyme dosage on oil extraction rate The data in each graph with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).The same as below.
试验号 No. | (A)酶解时间 Enzymatic hydrolysis time/h | (B)酶解温度 Enzymatic hydrolysis temperature/℃ | (C)酶解pH值 Enzymatic hydrolysis pH value | (D)加酶量 Enzyme dosage/ (U·g-1) | (R)提油率 Oil extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 64.91 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.97 |
3 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 67.11 |
4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 64.91 |
5 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 66.77 |
6 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 65.69 |
7 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 60.90 |
8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 65.53 |
9 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 64.12 |
10 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 66.53 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.22 |
12 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 68.11 |
13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 67.20 |
14 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 62.25 |
15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 64.25 |
16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 66.01 |
17 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 60.98 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.38 |
19 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 61.15 |
20 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 68.79 |
21 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 63.91 |
22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.54 |
23 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 63.75 |
24 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 65.09 |
25 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 67.44 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.29 |
27 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 63.42 |
28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 64.76 |
29 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 65.77 |
Table 3 Experiment program and results
试验号 No. | (A)酶解时间 Enzymatic hydrolysis time/h | (B)酶解温度 Enzymatic hydrolysis temperature/℃ | (C)酶解pH值 Enzymatic hydrolysis pH value | (D)加酶量 Enzyme dosage/ (U·g-1) | (R)提油率 Oil extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 64.91 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.97 |
3 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 67.11 |
4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 64.91 |
5 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 66.77 |
6 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 65.69 |
7 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 60.90 |
8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 65.53 |
9 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 64.12 |
10 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 66.53 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.22 |
12 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 68.11 |
13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 67.20 |
14 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 62.25 |
15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 64.25 |
16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 66.01 |
17 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 60.98 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.38 |
19 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 61.15 |
20 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 68.79 |
21 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 63.91 |
22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.54 |
23 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 63.75 |
24 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 65.09 |
25 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 67.44 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.29 |
27 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 63.42 |
28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 64.76 |
29 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 65.77 |
方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 233.33 | 14 | 16.67 | 140.95 | <0.000 1 | ** |
A | 13.23 | 1 | 13.23 | 111.89 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B | 0.078 | 1 | 0.078 | 0.66 | 0.429 1 | |
C | 38.77 | 1 | 38.77 | 327.90 | <0.000 1 | ** |
D | 1.79 | 1 | 1.79 | 15.17 | 0.001 6 | * |
AB | 1.21 | 1 | 1.21 | 10.23 | 0.006 4 | * |
AC | 0.72 | 1 | 0.72 | 6.11 | 0.029 6 | |
AD | 0.068 | 1 | 0.068 | 0.57 | 0.462 1 | |
BC | 7.16 | 1 | 7.16 | 60.52 | <0.000 1 | ** |
BD | 0.12 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.98 | 0.339 6 | |
CD | 0.79 | 1 | 0.79 | 6.70 | 0.021 5 | * |
A2 | 10.89 | 1 | 10.89 | 92.06 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B2 | 28.65 | 1 | 28.65 | 242.31 | <0.000 1 | ** |
C2 | 125.82 | 1 | 125.82 | 1 064.06 | <0.000 1 | ** |
D2 | 66.96 | 1 | 66.96 | 566.29 | <0.000 1 | ** |
残差Residual | 1.66 | 14 | 0.12 | |||
失拟项Lack of fit | 1.30 | 10 | 0.13 | 1.45 | 0.383 7 | |
纯误差Pure error | 0.36 | 4 | 0.089 | |||
总合Sum | 234.98 | 28 |
Table 4 Regression equation coefficient and significance
方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 233.33 | 14 | 16.67 | 140.95 | <0.000 1 | ** |
A | 13.23 | 1 | 13.23 | 111.89 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B | 0.078 | 1 | 0.078 | 0.66 | 0.429 1 | |
C | 38.77 | 1 | 38.77 | 327.90 | <0.000 1 | ** |
D | 1.79 | 1 | 1.79 | 15.17 | 0.001 6 | * |
AB | 1.21 | 1 | 1.21 | 10.23 | 0.006 4 | * |
AC | 0.72 | 1 | 0.72 | 6.11 | 0.029 6 | |
AD | 0.068 | 1 | 0.068 | 0.57 | 0.462 1 | |
BC | 7.16 | 1 | 7.16 | 60.52 | <0.000 1 | ** |
BD | 0.12 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.98 | 0.339 6 | |
CD | 0.79 | 1 | 0.79 | 6.70 | 0.021 5 | * |
A2 | 10.89 | 1 | 10.89 | 92.06 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B2 | 28.65 | 1 | 28.65 | 242.31 | <0.000 1 | ** |
C2 | 125.82 | 1 | 125.82 | 1 064.06 | <0.000 1 | ** |
D2 | 66.96 | 1 | 66.96 | 566.29 | <0.000 1 | ** |
残差Residual | 1.66 | 14 | 0.12 | |||
失拟项Lack of fit | 1.30 | 10 | 0.13 | 1.45 | 0.383 7 | |
纯误差Pure error | 0.36 | 4 | 0.089 | |||
总合Sum | 234.98 | 28 |
Fig.2 Response surface and contour map of the effects of enzymatic hydrolysis time, enzymatic hydrolysis temperature, enzymatic hydrolysis pH value and enzyme dosage on the oil extraction rate of pine seed cake
[1] | MOHAMED G A, IBRAHIM S R M, ELKHAYAT E S, et al. Natural anti-obesity agents[J]. v, Cairo University, 2014, 52(2): 269-284. |
[2] | 祖述冲, 魏亮, 赵修华. 红松籽制备红松籽油的原料性状及其制油工艺验证[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(10): 165-173. |
ZU S C, WEI L, ZHAO X H. Raw material characters of Korean pine seed oil prepared by the Korean pine seeds and verification of its production process[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2021, 41(10): 165-173. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | CHEN S J, HSU C P, LI C W, et al. Pinolenic acid inhibits human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell metastasis in vitro[J]. Food Chemistry, 2011, 126(4): 1708-1715. |
[4] | 柴杰, 金青哲, 薛雅琳, 等. 制油工艺对葵花籽油品质的影响[J]. 中国油脂, 2016, 41(4): 56-61. |
CHAI J, JIN Q Z, XUE Y L, et al. Effect of extraction process on quality of sunflower seed oil[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2016, 41(4): 56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | LAMSAL B P, MURPHY P A, JOHNSON L A. Flaking and extrusion as mechanical treatments for enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of oil from soybeans[J]. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2006, 83(11): 973-979. |
[6] | DE OLIVEIRA R C, DE BARROS S T D, GIMENES M L. The extraction of passion fruit oil with green solvents[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2013, 117(4): 458-463. |
[7] | 李默馨, 王妍, 周晓丹, 等. 冷榨红松籽油的工艺研究[J]. 食品工业, 2010, 31(5): 79-81. |
LI M X, WANG Y, ZHOU X D, et al. Study on cold-pressed of Korean pine seed oil[J]. The Food Industry, 2010, 31(5): 79-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | POLMANN G, BADIA V, FRENA M, et al. Enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction combined with experimental designs allow the obtaining of a high-quality and yield pecan nut oil[J]. LWT, 2019, 113: 108283. |
[9] | 朱敏敏, 赵巧玲, 魏长庆. 水酶法制油工艺研究进展[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2017, 30(11): 12-13. |
ZHU M M, ZHAO Q L, WEI C Q. Research advance on aqueous enzymatic extraction technology of oil[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2017, 30(11): 12-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 赵宇辉, 陈复生, 刘晨, 等. 水酶法提取花生油过程中乳状液性质研究进展[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(8): 222-226. |
ZHAO Y H, CHEN F S, LIU C, et al. Advance of progress on emulsion properties in aqueous enzymatic extraction of peanut oil[J]. Food & Machinery, 2022, 38(8): 222-226. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] |
JUNG S, MAURER D, JOHNSON L A. Factors affecting emulsion stability and quality of oil recovered from enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of soybeans[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(21): 5340-5347.
DOI PMID |
[12] | 何林枫, 王静, 李利钦, 等. 水酶法提取樱桃籽油的工艺及理化性质[J]. 食品与机械, 2023, 39(3): 188-193, 216. |
HE L F, WANG J, LI L Q, et al. Optimization on extraction of cherry seed oil by aqueous enzymatic method and analysis of its physical-chemical properties[J]. Food & Machinery, 2023, 39(3): 188-193, 216. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 李杨, 江连洲, 张兆国, 等. 挤压膨化后纤维降解对大豆水酶法提油率的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2010, 41(2): 157-163. |
LI Y, JIANG L Z, ZHANG Z G, et al. Effect of cellulose degradation on soybean oil extraction yield through extrusion and expansion processing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 41(2): 157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 赵自通, 陈复生, 周龙正. 酶法预处理对花生油脂体稳定性的影响及酶法破乳工艺优化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(1): 195-201. |
ZHAO Z T, CHEN F S, ZHOU L Z. Effect of enzymatic pretreatment on stability of peanut oil body and optimization of enzymatic demulsification process[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(1): 195-201. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | ZHANG S B, LIU X J, LU Q Y, et al. Enzymatic demulsification of the oil-rich emulsion obtained by aqueous extraction of peanut seeds[J]. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2013, 90(8): 1261-1270. |
[16] | MWAURAH P W, KUMAR S, KUMAR N, et al. Novel oil extraction technologies: process conditions, quality parameters, and optimization[J]. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2020, 19(1): 3-20. |
[17] | LI P F, GASMALLA M A A, LIU J J, et al. Characterization and demusification of cream emulsion from aqueous extraction of peanut[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2016, 185: 62-71. |
[18] |
NIKIFORIDIS C V, KIOSSEOGLOU V. Aqueous extraction of oil bodies from maize germ (Zea mays) and characterization of the resulting natural oil-in-water emulsion[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009, 57(12): 5591-5596.
DOI PMID |
[19] | 郭阳. 东北红松松籽油的提取及其微胶囊的制备[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2017. |
GUO Y. Extraction of pine nut oil and preparation of the microcapsule[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 吴非, 李钊, 周琪, 等. 超声波辅助水酶法提取米胚油及其成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 233-241. |
WU F, LI Z, ZHOU Q, et al. Ultrasonic-assisted aqueous enzymatic extraction and chemical composition of rice germ oil[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(24): 233-241. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[21] | ZHANG S B, WANG Z, XU S Y. Optimization of the aqueous enzymatic extraction of rapeseed oil and protein hydrolysates[J]. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2007, 84(1): 97-105. |
[22] | 张志伟, 王素梅. 水酶法提取玉米胚芽油-酶解工艺参数优化[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2015, 36(9): 115-118. |
ZHANG Z W, WANG S M. Aqueous enzymatic extraction of corn germ oil-optimization for the technology of enzyme hydrolysis[J]. Food Research and Development, 2015, 36(9): 115-118. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 肖旭华, 汪薇, 杨宏. 超声波辅助水酶法提取芝麻油的工艺优化研究[J]. 轻工学报, 2018, 33(5): 30-36. |
XIAO X H, WANG W, YANG H. Process optimization of ultrasonic-assisted aqueous enzymatic extraction of sesame oil[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2018, 33(5): 30-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | GHORBANZADEH R, REZAEI K. Optimization of an aqueous extraction process for pomegranate seed oil[J]. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2017, 94(12): 1491-1501. |
[25] | 张根生, 杨慧铎, 岳晓霞, 等. 水酶法提取南瓜籽油过程中乳状液酶法联合化学法破乳工艺研究[J]. 食品与机械, 2018, 34(10): 139-144, 178. |
ZHANG G S, YANG H D, YUE X X, et al. Study on enzymatic combined chemical demulsification process of emulsion from enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of pumpkin seed oil[J]. Food & Machinery, 2018, 34(10): 139-144, 178. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 王丽媛, 杨志伟. 响应面优化水酶法提取鳄梨油工艺[J]. 食品科技, 2018, 43(4): 235-241. |
WANG L Y, YANG Z W. Optimization on aqueous enzymatic extraction of avocado oil by response surface method[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2018, 43(4): 235-241. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 王亚萍, 姚小华, 常君, 等. 薄壳山核桃油水酶法提取工艺优化及品质分析[J]. 中国油脂, 2022, 47(5): 1-6. |
WANG Y P, YAO X H, CHANG J, et al. Optimization of aqueous enzymatic extraction process of pecan oil and its quality analysis[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2022, 47(5): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||