三十三个番茄自交系数量性状的配合力和遗传力分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.12.11

浙江农业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 2025-2035.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.12.11

三十三个番茄自交系数量性状的配合力和遗传力分析

王晓敏^1,2,3,4, 赵宇飞¹, 袁东升¹, 刘珮君¹, 郑福顺¹, 胡新华⁵, 付金军⁵, 高艳明^1,2,3,4, 李建设^1,2,3,4

1.宁夏大学农学院,宁夏银川 750021;
2.宁夏现代设施园艺工程技术研究中心,宁夏银川 750021;
3.宁夏设施园艺(宁夏大学)技术创新中心,宁夏银川 750021;
4.宁夏优势特色作物现代分子育种重点实验室,宁夏银川 750021;
5.宁夏巨丰种苗有限责任公司,宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2019-04-26 出版日期:2019-12-25 发布日期:2019-12-25
作者简介:王晓敏(1981-),女,陕西宝鸡人,博士,副教授,研究方向为蔬菜生物技术与遗传育种。E-mail: wangxiaomin_1981@163.com
基金资助:
宁夏回族自治区农业育种专项(NXNYYZ20150303)

Analysis of combining ability and heredity for quantitative traits of 33 tomato inbred lines

WANG Xiaomin^1,2,3,4, ZHAO Yufei¹, YUAN Dongsheng¹, LIU Peijun¹, ZHENG Fushun¹, HU Xinhua⁵, FU Jinjun⁵, GAO Yanming^1,2,3,4, LI Jianshe^1,2,3,4

1. School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021,China;
2. Ningxia Modern Facility Horticulture Engineering Technology Research Center, Yinchuan 750021,China;
3. Ningxia Facility Horticulture(Ningxia University)Technology Innovation Center, Yinchuan 750021,China;
4. Key Laboratory of Modern Molecular Breeding for Dominant and Special Crops in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750021,China;
5. Ningxia Jufeng Seedlings Limited Liability Company, Yinchuan 750021,China

Received:2019-04-26 Online:2019-12-25 Published:2019-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为评价番茄自交系的配合力和遗传力,本研究以33个番茄自交系为材料,按照NC Ⅱ不完全双列杂交法,配制成116个组合,分析单花序果数、单果质量、果实纵径、果实横径、果形指数、果柄大小、果梗洼大小、木栓化大小、硬度、可溶性固形物含量及果肉厚共11个数量性状的配合力和遗传力。结果表明,果梗洼大小、果实纵径、果实横径、可溶性固形物、单花序果数、单果质量主要受基因的加性效应控制,可稳定遗传给后代;果肉厚、木栓化大小、硬度、果柄大小、果形指数主要受基因的非加性效应控制,应该通过优势育种来利用;可溶性固形物含量遗传力较高,可稳定遗传给后代。单花序果数、单果质量、果实横径、果柄大小、果梗洼大小、木栓化大小、硬度、果肉厚的广义遗传力较高,而狭义遗传力偏低,适于杂交优势利用;果实纵径和果形指数遗传力均较小,选择效果较差。60126、60229、60270、60529、60974和61227的一般配合力相对效应值较高;60229×60478、60480×60429、60974×60478、60977×60497、60270×61011、60645×60478的特殊配合力相对效应值较高。试验结果为宁夏番茄育种亲本的选择和优势杂交组合的配制提供依据。

关键词: 番茄, 数量性状, 遗传力, 配合力

Abstract: In order to evaluate the combining ability and heredity of tomato inbred lines, 116 combinations of 33 tomato inbred lines were adopted by NC Ⅱ incomplete biserial hybridization, combining ability and heredity of 11 quantitative characters, such as the single inflorescence number, single fruit weight, fruit vertical diameter, fruit transverse diameter, fruit shape index, pedicel length, size of corky area around pedicel scar, size of pedicel suberification, hardness, soluble solids content and flesh thickness were analyzed in this study. The results showed that the size of corky area around pedicel scar, fruit vertical diameter, fruit transverse diameter, soluble solids content, single inflorescence number and single fruit weight were mainly controlled by additive effects of genes, which could be stably inherited to the offsprings. The flesh thickness, size of pedicel suberification, hardness, pedicel length and fruit shape index were mainly controlled by the non-additive effect of genes and should be utilized by heterosis breeding. The heritability of soluble solids content was high, and it could be stably inherited to the offsprings. The general heritabilities of single inflorescence fruit number, single fruit weight, fruit transverse diameter, pedicel length, size of pedicel scar, size of pedicel suberification, hardness and flesh thickness were higher, but the narrow heritabilities were lower, so they were suitable for hybrid advantage utilization; the heritabilities of fruit vertical diameter and fruit shape index were lower with poor selection effect. The relative effect value of the general combining abilities of the parents 60126, 60229, 60270, 60529, 60974 and 61227 were higher, the relative effect value of the special combining abilities of the following combinations, such as 60229×60478, 60480×60429, 60974×60478, 60977×60497, 60270×61011 and 60645×60478 were higher. These results would provide references for the parents selection and dominant hybrid combinations preparation of tomato in Ningxia.

Key words: tomato, quantitative trait, heredity, combining ability

中图分类号:

S641.2

王晓敏, 赵宇飞, 袁东升, 刘珮君, 郑福顺, 胡新华, 付金军, 高艳明, 李建设. 三十三个番茄自交系数量性状的配合力和遗传力分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 2025-2035.

WANG Xiaomin, ZHAO Yufei, YUAN Dongsheng, LIU Peijun, ZHENG Fushun, HU Xinhua, FU Jinjun, GAO Yanming, LI Jianshe. Analysis of combining ability and heredity for quantitative traits of 33 tomato inbred lines[J]. , 2019, 31(12): 2025-2035.

参考文献

[1] 张倩男. 基于表型性状及SSR、SNP标记的樱桃番茄种质资源遗传多样性分析[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2018.
ZHANG Q N.Genetic diversity analysis of cherry tomato germplasm resources based on Morphological, SSR and SNP markers[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2018.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 李云洲, 闫见敏, 须文, 等. 番茄种质资源主要植物学性状的遗传多样性及相关性[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(2): 68-74.
LI Y Z, YAN J M, XU W, et al.Genetic diversity and correlation analysis of main botanical traits in tomato germplasm resources[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(2): 68-74.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 王刚. “五个振兴”聚力农业农村全面现代化[J].农村工作通讯,2019(4):35-36.
WANG G.“Five rejuvenation” gathers the comprehensive modernization of agriculture and rural areas[J]. Rural Work Communication, 2019(4):35-36. (in Chinese)
[4] 邵祺. 14个玉米自交系的配合力测定及遗传力分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2018.
SHAO Q.Analysis of combining ability and heritability on 14 maize inbred lines[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2018.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 贺囡囡, 蒙云飞, 韦桂旺, 等. 8个糯玉米自交系11个农艺性状的配合力分析及其评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(16): 76-80.
HE N N, MENG Y F, WEI G W, et al.Analysis and evaluation of combining ability of 11 agronomic traits of 8 waxy corn inbred lines[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(16): 76-80.(in Chinese)
[6] 朱崴. 三个玉米自交系配合力测定和遗传力分析及其评价[D]. 天津: 天津农学院, 2013.
ZHU W.Analysis and evaluate of combining ability and heritabity on 3 maize inbred lines[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Agricultural University, 2013.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 林鑫, 吴林宣, 王慧, 等. 水稻两系不育系‘M20S’穗部性状配合力和遗传力分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 8-14.
LIN X, WU L X, WANG H, et al.Analysis on panicle trait combining ability and heritability of rice two-line sterile line ‘M20S’[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(1): 8-14.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 蒋钰东, 况浩池, 罗俊涛, 等. 三系杂交稻优质不育系德66A主要经济性状的配合力分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(6): 118-121.
JIANG Y D, KUANG H C, LUO J T, et al.Analysis on combining ability of main economic characters of three-line sterile line De66A[J]. China Rice, 2018, 24(6): 118-121.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 姚金保, 周淼平, 马鸿翔, 等. 小麦籽粒硬度的遗传分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2018, 34(4): 721-725.
YAO J B, ZHOU M P, MA H X, et al.Genetic analysis of grain hardness in bread wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 34(4): 721-725.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 李志华, 穆婷婷, 刘鑫, 等. 4个谷子不育系主要农艺性状的配合力分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(3): 61-67.
LI Z H, MU T T, LIU X, et al.Combining ability analysis of main agronomic characters of four millet sterile lines[J]. Crops, 2018(3): 61-67.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 郎荣斌, 边芯, 孙有芳, 等. 甘蔗引进品种与云割F₃亲本遗传力与配合力分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(9): 1783-1788.
LANG R B, BIAN X, SUN Y F, et al.Heritability and combining ability of introduced sugarcane varieties and Yunnan parents F₃ of Spontaneum[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(9): 1783-1788.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 王毅, 董云, 靳丰蔚, 等. 春性甘蓝型杂交油菜配合力与遗传效应[J]. 西北农业学报, 2016, 25(11): 1623-1628.
WANG Y, DONG Y, JIN F W, et al.Combining ability and heritability research of spring-planted hybrids in Brassica napus L[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2016, 25(11): 1623-1628.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 张国建, 俎峰, 刘坚坚, 等. 甘蓝型油菜Ogura胞质不育系主要农艺性状配合力与遗传力分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(6): 2369-2373.
ZHANG G J, ZU F, LIU J J, et al.Combining ability and heritability analysis of Ogura CMS main agronomy characters in Brassica napus L[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(6): 2369-2373.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 高玉蓉. 云南辣椒自交系产量性状配合力测定及优势组合选配[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
GAO Y R.The chili inbred lines combing ability of yield characters determine and combinations of optional in Yunnan Province[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 张芮豪, 龙洪进, 桂敏, 等. 加工型辣椒自交系主要性状配合力及其相关性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(5): 1899-1902.
ZHANG R H, LONG H J, GUI M, et al.Analysis of combining ability and correlation on main characters in processing pepper inbred lines[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(5): 1899-1902.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 朱明涛. 分子标记辅助番茄自交系改良及其配合力的测定[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2010.
ZHU M T.Inbred lines selected with molecular markers and their combining ability in tomato[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 李慧. 番茄主要品质性状的杂种优势及其遗传效应的研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2006.
LI H.Heterosis and inheritance of main quality characters of tomato[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2006.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 于分弟. 番茄杂交一代杂种优势表现、遗传效应及性状相关性的研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2012.
YU F D.Research on heterosis, genetic effects and correlation in characters of hybridization generation of tomato[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 李自娟. 番茄无果梗节串性品种选育及自交系配合力分析[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2009.
LI Z J.Tomato breeding with jointless truss and analysis of combining ability of inbred lines[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2009.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 田园, 张喜春, 谷建田. 番茄亲本完全双列杂交后糖组分的配合力及遗传力分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(16): 46-50.
TIAN Y, ZHANG X C, GU J T.Combining ability and heritability of polysaccharide component after griffing complete diallel crossing of tomato parents[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(16): 46-50.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 王先裕, 于分弟, 梁聪耀, 等. 番茄核雄性不育系大107果实硬度杂种优势及遗传效应的研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2010(20): 27-31.
WANG X Y, YU F D, LIANG C Y, et al.Studies on heterosis and inheritance of fruit firmness in genetic male sterile tomato: ‘Da107’[J]. China Vegetables, 2010(20): 27-31.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 田硕, 张喜春. 番茄果实主要品质性状的配合力及遗传力分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(13): 112-117.
TIAN S, ZHANG X C.The analysis of combining ability and heritability of main quality characteristic in tomato[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(13): 112-117.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 杨永政. 樱桃番茄主要数量性状的遗传研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2006.
YANG Y Z.Genetic analysis on major quantitative characters in cherry tomato[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2006.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 杨永政, 巩振辉, 梁燕. 樱桃番茄主要营养品质性状的配合力与遗传效应研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(5): 179-183.
YANG Y Z, GONG Z H, LIANG Y.Studies on combining ability and genetic effects of main quality characters in cherry tomato[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 35(5): 179-183.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 孙保娟. 樱桃番茄主要数量性状的遗传效应研究[D].长春:吉林农业大学, 2002.
SUN B J.Genetic anslysis on major quantitative traits in cherry tomato[D].Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University,2002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 刘艳梅. 普通番茄与樱桃番茄杂交一代优势表现及遗传规律的研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2004.
LIU Y M.Heterosis performances and genetics analysis of F₁ hybrids between common tomato and cherry tomato[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2004.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 王志强, 刘声锋, 王炬春, 等. 8个西瓜亲本材料主要农艺性状的配合力和遗传力分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(11): 1615-1621.
WANG Z Q, LIU S F, WANG J C, et al.Analysis of combining ability and heritability for main traits of 8 parents in watermelon[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(11): 1615-1621.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 芮文婧, 王晓敏, 张倩男, 等. 番茄353份种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(3): 561-570.
RUI W J, WANG X M, ZHANG Q N, et al.Genetic diversity analysis of 353 tomato germplasm resources by phenotypic traits[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2018, 45(3): 561-570.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 李锡香, 沈镝. 番茄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.
[30] 沈佳, 寿伟松, 张跃建. 甜瓜果实主要数量性状的配合力分析[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2017, 30(12): 4-8.
SHEN J, SHOU W S, ZHANG Y J.Analysis of combining ability for mainly quantitative characters of melon fruit[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2017, 30(12): 4-8.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 吴涛, 董彦琪, 肖艳, 等. 大白菜主要表型性状的配合力评价及遗传力分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(12): 102-109.
WU T, DONG Y Q, XIAO Y, et al.Study on the combining ability and heritability analysis of the main phenotypic traits in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis)[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 47(12): 102-109.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] MURTADHA M A, ARIYO O J, ALGHAMDI S S.Analysis of combining ability over environments in diallel crosses of maize (Zea mays)[J]. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 17(1): 69-78.
[33] 鲍遵宇. 苦瓜三交杂种优势、配合力及遗传距离关系研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2018.
BAO Z Y.Study on relationship among heterosis, combining ability and genetic distance of three-way cross of Momordica charantial[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2018.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 唐佳. 甘蓝型油菜株型相关性状的杂种优势及配合力分析[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2012.
TANG J.Analyses on heterosis and combining ability of the traits related to plant types in Brassica napus L.[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012.(in Chinese with English abstract)

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

1894

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	4	0	0	1890

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	1270	624
比例	67%	33%

摘要

806

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	806

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	803	3
比例	100%	0%

三十三个番茄自交系数量性状的配合力和遗传力分析

Analysis of combining ability and heredity for quantitative traits of 33 tomato inbred lines

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王同林, 叶红霞, 郑积荣, 李明. 番茄果实中主要风味物质研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1513-1522.
[2]	乔亚丽, 郁继华, 李旺雄, 金宁, 金莉, 吕剑, 肖雪梅, 唐中褀, 胡琳莉. 番茄果实不同采收时间矿质元素变化分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 430-436.
[3]	刘新宇, 陈鹏, 张光辉, 赵俊杰, 李博浩, 张南, 孙韦珂, 许娟娟, 叶行涛, 魏金鹏, 于高波. 外源脯氨酸对番茄体内残留百菌清降解的调控作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 437-446.
[4]	张芳, 王佩欣, 何勇, 骆慧枫, 寿国忠. 基于物联网的阳台微型温室作物生长环境因子探究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 234-242.
[5]	李乐, 田敏娇, 高艳明, 李建设. 硒肥对基质培番茄生长和矿质元素积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 253-261.
[6]	赵星凯, 石海春, 余学杰, 杨殊, 赵长云, 夏伟, 柯永培. 十三份玉米新自交系的育种潜势分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2119-2127.
[7]	朱晓林, 魏小红, 王宝强, 王贤, 张明君. c-GMP诱导对盐胁迫下番茄的转录组分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1788-1797.
[8]	孙德智, 杨恒山, 张庆国, 范富, 苏雅乐其其格, 彭靖, 韩晓日. 外源一氧化氮供体硝普钠对番茄幼苗盐胁迫伤害的缓解作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1286-1294.
[9]	王掌军, 刘妍, 张双喜, 刘凤楼, 李清峰, 张晓岗, 刘生祥, 贾彪. 宁春4号与河东乌麦杂交F₂代抗病性及分子标记鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(5): 677-687.
[10]	杨亚娜, 樊小雪, 徐刚, 张宇, 李亚灵, 温祥珍. 不同红蓝LED光照强度和灌溉量交互作用对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(5): 737-745.
[11]	林薇, 周海霞, 兰挚谦, 张凯歌, 刘吉青, 张雪艳. 基于葵花杆硫酸铵生物基肥的番茄不同生育期配方肥的效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(5): 756-765.
[12]	邢鲲, 曹俊宇, 赵飞. 设施番茄昆虫群落组成及时间动态的聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 600-606.
[13]	赵云翔, 阳文攀, 高宁, 彭兴, 张从林, 陈瑶生, 刘小红. 大白母猪利用年限与初产性状间的遗传相关分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1812-1818.
[14]	朱隆静, 陈先知, 周友和, 苏世闻, 王克磊, 徐坚. 潮汐灌溉在番茄育苗上的应用研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(2): 242-247.
[15]	邵泱峰, 马燕萍, 应学兵, 徐健, 李松昊, 何勇. 不同山核桃蒲壳配方基质对番茄产量和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(2): 255-260.