浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1431-1438.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.07.10
汪秀媛1(), 邹奕巧2, 刘玲玲1, 陈珍3,*(
), 江景勇4
收稿日期:
2021-10-08
出版日期:
2022-07-25
发布日期:
2022-07-26
通讯作者:
陈珍
作者简介:
* 陈珍,E-mail: chenzh@tzc.edu.cn基金资助:
WANG Xiuyuan1(), ZOU Yiqiao2, LIU Lingling1, CHEN Zhen3,*(
), JIANG Jingyong4
Received:
2021-10-08
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-07-26
Contact:
CHEN Zhen
摘要:
掌叶覆盆子(Rubus chingii Hu)药食同源,营养保健价值凸显,经济效益显著。为加快掌叶覆盆子良种繁育,以药用成分含量较高的优质株系L14茎段为外植体,采用调整植物生长调节剂的组合、质量浓度,以及矿质元素含量的方式,优化组培快繁体系。结果表明,添加0.1 mg·L-1萘乙酸(NAA)时,5.0~30.0 mg·L-1 6-糠氨基腺嘌呤/激动素(KT)促进掌叶覆盆子组培苗增殖的效果与0.5~3.0 mg·L-1 6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)相当,可见,6-BA的作用强度约为KT的10倍。0.5~3.0 mgL-1的6-BA会引起试管苗的玻璃化,0.1~1.0 mg·L-1 KT的添加有助于减轻玻璃化,其中,0.5 mg·L-1 6-BA+1.0 mg·L-1 KT的细胞分裂素组合下掌叶覆盆子组培苗增殖系数最大,达10.33,且苗生长健壮。调整培养基中具体矿质元素的含量,可进一步促进试管苗的生长。因此,优化后的掌叶覆盆子增殖培养基配方为:改良的MS培养基(2倍浓度的Ca、Cu和Mn,1/4 Mg和1/2 Zn)+ 6-BA 0.5 mg·L-1 + KT 1.0 mg·L-1 + NAA 0.1 mg·L-1,试管苗增殖良好,生长健壮,能有效抑制玻璃化的产生。
中图分类号:
汪秀媛, 邹奕巧, 刘玲玲, 陈珍, 江景勇. 掌叶覆盆子组培快繁体系中生长调节剂与矿质元素的优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1431-1438.
WANG Xiuyuan, ZOU Yiqiao, LIU Lingling, CHEN Zhen, JIANG Jingyong. Optimizing tissue culture media for Rubus chingii Hu multiplication: effects of plant growth regulators and mineral elements[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1431-1438.
6-BA/ (mg·L-1) | KT/ (mg·L-1) | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | 苗生长状况 Growing situation of seedlings |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 e | 黄化Etiolated seedlings |
0 | 0.05 | 0 e | 黄化Etiolated seedlings |
0 | 0.10 | 0.67±0.61 de | 生长缓慢,浅绿Slow growing and light green seedlings |
0 | 0.50 | 0 e | 苗有一定生长,绿色Certain growing and green seedlings |
0 | 1.00 | 0 e | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.05 | 0 | 0.33±0.33 e | 苗细小,浅绿Weak and light green seedlings |
0.05 | 0.05 | 0.50±0.19 de | 部分黄化Certain etiolated seedlings |
0.05 | 0.10 | 0.78±0.51 de | 浅绿Light green seedlings |
0.05 | 0.50 | 0 e | 深绿Dark green seedlings |
0.05 | 1.00 | 0.83±0.43 de | 苗生长较好,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.10 | 0 | 0.58±0.57 e | 黄化、玻璃化Etiolated and vitrified seedlings |
0.10 | 0.05 | 0.67±0.67 e | 苗细小,浅绿Weak and light green seedlings |
0.10 | 0.10 | 1.17±0.24 de | 苗细小,浅绿Weak and light green seedlings |
0.10 | 0.50 | 2.11±0.51 d | 苗生长较好,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.10 | 1.00 | 1.44±0.19 de | 苗生长较好,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.50 | 0 | 5.33±0.47 c | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
0.50 | 0.05 | 8.08±1.23 b | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
0.50 | 0.10 | 7.78 ±0.77 b | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.50 | 0.50 | 5.67±0.54 c | 苗较健壮,深绿 |
0.50 | 1.00 | 10.33±0.67 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves |
1.00 | 0 | 7.89±1.02 b | 严重玻璃化Severe vitrified seedlings |
1.00 | 0.05 | 8.42±2.42 b | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
1.00 | 0.10 | 7.67±2.26 b | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
1.00 | 0.50 | 8.25±1.60 b | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
1.00 | 1.00 | 7.50±1.04 b | 苗健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
表1 6-BA和KT组合对掌叶覆盆子组培苗增殖生长的影响
Table 1 Effects of 6-BA and KT combination on multiplication and growth of Rubus chingii Hu plantlets
6-BA/ (mg·L-1) | KT/ (mg·L-1) | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | 苗生长状况 Growing situation of seedlings |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 e | 黄化Etiolated seedlings |
0 | 0.05 | 0 e | 黄化Etiolated seedlings |
0 | 0.10 | 0.67±0.61 de | 生长缓慢,浅绿Slow growing and light green seedlings |
0 | 0.50 | 0 e | 苗有一定生长,绿色Certain growing and green seedlings |
0 | 1.00 | 0 e | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.05 | 0 | 0.33±0.33 e | 苗细小,浅绿Weak and light green seedlings |
0.05 | 0.05 | 0.50±0.19 de | 部分黄化Certain etiolated seedlings |
0.05 | 0.10 | 0.78±0.51 de | 浅绿Light green seedlings |
0.05 | 0.50 | 0 e | 深绿Dark green seedlings |
0.05 | 1.00 | 0.83±0.43 de | 苗生长较好,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.10 | 0 | 0.58±0.57 e | 黄化、玻璃化Etiolated and vitrified seedlings |
0.10 | 0.05 | 0.67±0.67 e | 苗细小,浅绿Weak and light green seedlings |
0.10 | 0.10 | 1.17±0.24 de | 苗细小,浅绿Weak and light green seedlings |
0.10 | 0.50 | 2.11±0.51 d | 苗生长较好,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.10 | 1.00 | 1.44±0.19 de | 苗生长较好,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.50 | 0 | 5.33±0.47 c | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
0.50 | 0.05 | 8.08±1.23 b | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
0.50 | 0.10 | 7.78 ±0.77 b | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
0.50 | 0.50 | 5.67±0.54 c | 苗较健壮,深绿 |
0.50 | 1.00 | 10.33±0.67 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves |
1.00 | 0 | 7.89±1.02 b | 严重玻璃化Severe vitrified seedlings |
1.00 | 0.05 | 8.42±2.42 b | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
1.00 | 0.10 | 7.67±2.26 b | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings |
1.00 | 0.50 | 8.25±1.60 b | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
1.00 | 1.00 | 7.50±1.04 b | 苗健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings |
植物生长调节剂 Plant growth regulator/(mg·L-1) | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | 苗生长状况 Growing situation of seedlings | |
---|---|---|---|
KT | 0.10 | 0.17±0.29 e | 苗细小Weak seedlings |
0.50 | 0.25±0.01 e | 苗有一定生长Certain growing seedlings | |
1.00 | 0.44±0.19 e | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings | |
2.00 | 0.75±0.25 e | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings | |
5.00 | 4.33±0.63 c | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
10.00 | 5.33±0.77 ab | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
20.00 | 4.89±0.38 bc | 玻璃化,浅绿Vitrified and light green seedlings | |
30.00 | 6.11±0.19 a | 玻璃化,浅绿Vitrified and light green seedlings | |
6-BA | 0.01 | 0.11±0.33 e | 苗细小Weak seedlings |
0.05 | 0.67±0.33 e | 苗细小Weak seedlings | |
0.10 | 0.67±0.29 e | 苗小,浅绿Small and light green seedlings | |
0.20 | 2.89±0.69 d | 苗较健壮,浅绿Relatively well and light green seedlings | |
0.50 | 5.00±0.88 bc | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings | |
1.00 | 5.67±0.58 ab | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings | |
2.00 | 6.00±0.01 a | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings | |
3.00 | 5.89±0.51 a | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings |
表2 6-BA或KT对掌叶覆盆子组培苗增殖生长的影响
Table 2 Effects of 6-BA or KT on multiplication and growth of R. chingii plantlets
植物生长调节剂 Plant growth regulator/(mg·L-1) | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | 苗生长状况 Growing situation of seedlings | |
---|---|---|---|
KT | 0.10 | 0.17±0.29 e | 苗细小Weak seedlings |
0.50 | 0.25±0.01 e | 苗有一定生长Certain growing seedlings | |
1.00 | 0.44±0.19 e | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings | |
2.00 | 0.75±0.25 e | 苗较健壮,深绿Relatively well and dark green seedlings | |
5.00 | 4.33±0.63 c | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
10.00 | 5.33±0.77 ab | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
20.00 | 4.89±0.38 bc | 玻璃化,浅绿Vitrified and light green seedlings | |
30.00 | 6.11±0.19 a | 玻璃化,浅绿Vitrified and light green seedlings | |
6-BA | 0.01 | 0.11±0.33 e | 苗细小Weak seedlings |
0.05 | 0.67±0.33 e | 苗细小Weak seedlings | |
0.10 | 0.67±0.29 e | 苗小,浅绿Small and light green seedlings | |
0.20 | 2.89±0.69 d | 苗较健壮,浅绿Relatively well and light green seedlings | |
0.50 | 5.00±0.88 bc | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings | |
1.00 | 5.67±0.58 ab | 轻微玻璃化Slightly vitrified seedlings | |
2.00 | 6.00±0.01 a | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings | |
3.00 | 5.89±0.51 a | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings |
元素 Element | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | 苗生长状况 Growing situation of seedlings | |
---|---|---|---|
Ca2+ | 1/4 MS | 4.08±1.07 a | 部分玻璃化Certain vitrified seedlings |
1/2 MS | 5.75±1.10 a | 黄化,玻璃化Etiolated and vitrified seedlings | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 a | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 4.58±1.17 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
4×MS | 5.44±1.39 a | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings | |
Mg2+ | 1/4 MS | 7.67±1.33 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves |
1/2 MS | 4.58±1.62 b | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 b | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 4.22±1.54 b | 苗矮小Weak seedlings | |
4×MS | 3.50±0.43 b | 苗矮小,玻璃化Weak and vitrified seedlings | |
Cu2+ | 1/4 MS | 5.17±1.11 ab | 黄化Etiolated seedlings |
1/2 MS | 6.17±1.69 a | 黄化Etiolated seedlings | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 ab | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 6.08±1.07 a | 苗健壮Seedlings grow well | |
4×MS | 4.00±0.58 b | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
Mn2+ | 1/4 MS | 5.83±1.29 ab | 黄化,玻璃化Etiolated and vitrified seedlings |
1/2 MS | 5.42±0.63 ab | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 b | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 5.92±0.83 ab | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
4×MS | 6.83±1.14 a | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
Zn2+ | 1/4 MS | 5.75±1.10 a | 部分黄化Certain Etiolated seedlings |
1/2 MS | 5.83±1.23 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 a | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 5.42±0.88 a | 苗较健壮,浅绿Relative well and light green seedlings | |
4×MS | 5.45±0.79 a | 轻微玻璃化Certain vitrified seedlings |
表3 矿质元素质量浓度对掌叶覆盆子组培苗增殖生长的影响
Table 3 Effects of different element concentrations on multiplication and growth of R. chingii plantlets
元素 Element | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | 苗生长状况 Growing situation of seedlings | |
---|---|---|---|
Ca2+ | 1/4 MS | 4.08±1.07 a | 部分玻璃化Certain vitrified seedlings |
1/2 MS | 5.75±1.10 a | 黄化,玻璃化Etiolated and vitrified seedlings | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 a | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 4.58±1.17 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
4×MS | 5.44±1.39 a | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings | |
Mg2+ | 1/4 MS | 7.67±1.33 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves |
1/2 MS | 4.58±1.62 b | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 b | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 4.22±1.54 b | 苗矮小Weak seedlings | |
4×MS | 3.50±0.43 b | 苗矮小,玻璃化Weak and vitrified seedlings | |
Cu2+ | 1/4 MS | 5.17±1.11 ab | 黄化Etiolated seedlings |
1/2 MS | 6.17±1.69 a | 黄化Etiolated seedlings | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 ab | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 6.08±1.07 a | 苗健壮Seedlings grow well | |
4×MS | 4.00±0.58 b | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
Mn2+ | 1/4 MS | 5.83±1.29 ab | 黄化,玻璃化Etiolated and vitrified seedlings |
1/2 MS | 5.42±0.63 ab | 玻璃化Vitrified seedlings | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 b | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 5.92±0.83 ab | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
4×MS | 6.83±1.14 a | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
Zn2+ | 1/4 MS | 5.75±1.10 a | 部分黄化Certain Etiolated seedlings |
1/2 MS | 5.83±1.23 a | 苗健壮,深绿Seedlings grow well with dark green leaves | |
1×MS | 5.25±0.69 a | 苗较健壮Relative well seedlings | |
2×MS | 5.42±0.88 a | 苗较健壮,浅绿Relative well and light green seedlings | |
4×MS | 5.45±0.79 a | 轻微玻璃化Certain vitrified seedlings |
[1] | 严建立, 周历萍, 张乐, 等. 掌叶覆盆子红熟果营养品质及耐贮性测定[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(2): 242-244. |
YAN J L, ZHOU L P, ZHANG L, et al. Analysis on nutritional quality and storability of red fruit of Rubus chingii[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 60(2): 242-244. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | CHEN Z, JIANG J Y, LI X B, et al. Bioactive compounds and fruit quality of Chinese raspberry, Rubus chingii Hu varied with genotype and phenological phase[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2021, 281: 109951. |
[3] |
LI X B, SUN J, CHEN Z, et al. Characterization of carotenoids and phenolics during fruit ripening of Chinese raspberry (Rubus chingii Hu)[J]. RSC Advances, 2021, 11(18): 10804-10813.
DOI URL |
[4] | 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典: 一部[M]. 2015年版. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2015. |
[5] |
YAU M H, CHE C T, LIANG S M, et al. An aqueous extract of Rubus chingii fruits protects primary rat hepatocytes against tert-butyl hydroperoxide induced oxidative stress[J]. Life Sciences, 2002, 72(3): 329-338.
DOI URL |
[6] | YU G H, LUO Z Q, WANG W B, et al. Rubus chingii Hu: a review of the phytochemistry and pharmacology[J]. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2019, 10: 799. |
[7] |
CHEN Y, CHEN Z Q, GUO Q W, et al. Identification of ellagitannins in the unripe fruit of Rubus chingii Hu and evaluation of its potential antidiabetic activity[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2019, 67(25): 7025-7039.
DOI URL |
[8] |
SHENG J Y, WANG S Q, LIU K H, et al. Rubus chingii Hu: an overview of botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology[J]. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, 2020, 18(6): 401-416.
DOI URL |
[9] |
KE H H, BAO T, CHEN W. New function of polysaccharide from Rubus chingii Hu: protective effect against ethyl carbamate induced cytotoxicity[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2021, 101(8): 3156-3164.
DOI URL |
[10] | 江景勇, 陈珍, 卢秀友, 等. 掌叶覆盆子根插快繁育苗技术[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2013, 54(2): 145-146. |
JIANG J Y, CHEN Z, LU X Y, et al. Rapid propagation technology of Rubus chingii by root transplanting[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 54(2): 145-146. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 游晓庆, 陈慧, 李晓辉, 等. 不同种源掌叶覆盆子种子和果实表型性状及发芽率研究[J]. 南方林业科学, 2019, 47(3): 16-19, 34. |
YOU X Q, CHEN H, LI X H, et al. Phenotypic traits and germination rate of Rubus chingii seeds and fruits from different sources[J]. South China Forestry Science, 2019, 47(3): 16-19, 34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 刘计权. 应用组织培养对覆盆子快速繁殖的研究[J]. 中南药学, 2006, 4(6): 426-428. |
LIU J Q. Rapid propagation of Rubus chingii by plant tissue culture[J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2006, 4(6): 426-428. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 潘彬荣, 罗天宽, 张永鑫. 掌叶覆盆子的组织培养技术[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2010, 51(3): 508-510. |
PAN B R, LUO T K, ZHANG Y X. Tissue culture of Rubus chingii[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 51(3): 508-510. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | ZHU W J, XU S F, CHEN Y T. Research on rapid propagation and domestication of wild raspberry plantlets[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2016, 17(2): 298-300. |
[15] | 谢从寿, 陈泳和, 应薛养, 等. 掌叶覆盆子组培快繁技术[J]. 福建农业科技, 2020(10): 32-36. |
XIE C S, CHEN Y H, YING X Y, et al. Study on the technologies of tissue culture and rapid propagation of Rubus chingii[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(10): 32-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 王利平, 陈珍, 江景勇, 等. 优质掌叶覆盆子快繁体系的建立[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2013, 54(8): 967-970. |
WANG L P, CHEN Z, JIANG J Y, et al. Establishment of rapid propagation system of Rubus chingii Hu with high quality[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 54(8): 967-970. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 龚明霞, 陈小凤, 方锋学, 等. 洋桔梗组培苗玻璃化原因及恢复的研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2009, 22(6): 1718-1721. |
GONG M X, CHEN X F, FANG F X, et al. Study on cause and recovery of vitrification in tissue culture of Eustoma grandifloru[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 22(6): 1718-1721. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] |
CENTENO M L, RODRÍGUEZ A, FEITO I, et al. Relationship between endogenous auxin and cytokinin levels and morphogenic responses in Actinidia deliciosa tissue cultures[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1996, 16(1/2): 58-62.
DOI URL |
[19] | 高红兵, 唐晓杰, 孟庆繁. 高浓度6-BA诱导酸樱桃苗的玻璃化苗内源激素含量变化[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(4): 488-490. |
GAO H B, TANG X J, MENG Q F. Effect of high level of 6-BA on the endogenous hormones level changes in the vitrification seedling of Prunus cerasus[J]. Forest Research, 2006, 19(4): 488-490. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 李海燕, 王小敏, 李维林, 等. 树莓品种‘Kivigold’组培快繁技术体系建立[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(4): 203-207. |
LI H Y, WANG X M, LI W L, et al. Tissue culture and rapid propagation of raspberry(Rubus idaeus) cultivar ‘Kivigold’[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(4): 203-207. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] |
DEBNATH S C. Clonal propagation of dwarf raspberry (Rubus pubescens Raf.) through in vitro axillary shoot proliferation[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2004, 43(2): 179-186.
DOI URL |
[22] | WU J H, MILLER S A, HALL H K, et al. Factors affecting the efficiency of micropropagation from lateral buds and shoot tips of Rubus[J]. Plant Cell, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 2009, 99(1): 17-25. |
[23] |
VUJOVIĆ T, RUŽIĆÐ, CEROVIĆ R, et al. Adventitious regeneration in blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L.) and assessment of genetic stability in regenerants[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2010, 61(3): 265-275.
DOI URL |
[24] | POOTHONG S, REED B M. Increased CaCl2, MgSO4, and KH2PO4 improve the growth of micropropagated red raspberries[J]. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 2015, 51(6): 648-658. |
[25] | 杨琼芬, 卢丽丽, 包丽仙, 等. 营养元素的使用对马铃薯脱毒组培苗生长的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2012, 26(4): 193-198. |
YANG Q F, LU L L, BAO L X, et al. Influence of nutrient elements on in vitro potato plantlets[J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2012, 26(4): 193-198. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 李云, 田砚亭, 罗晓芳. 玻璃苗中纤维素、木素及元素含量变化的研究[J]. 核农学报, 1997, 11(2): 103-111. |
LI Y, TIAN Y T, LUO X F. Study on distribution and variation of cellulose, lignine and elements in vitreous shoot of Malus zumi[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 1997, 11(2): 103-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 张伟, 朱方平. 矿质元素对凤梨组培褐变的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2012(9): 112-114. |
ZHANG W, ZHU F P. Effects of mineral elements on browning of Ananas comosus in tissue culture[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2012(9): 112-114. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 赵密珍, 王壮伟, 吴伟民, 等. 培养基大量元素、蔗糖、琼脂对草莓试管苗生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2007, 23(6): 626-629. |
ZHAO M Z, WANG Z W, WU W M, et al. Effects of macroelement, sucrose and agar in medium on growth of strawberry plantlet in vitro[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 23(6): 626-629. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 雷雨梦, 闫国超, 杨静, 朱祝军. 青花菜中矿质元素的近红外光谱快速测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 548-556. |
[2] | 何庆海, 刘本同, 周政德, 方茹, 杨少宗. 基于枝条和叶片表型性状的掌叶覆盆子种质资源多样性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1660-1667. |
[3] | 王雨鑫, 邓燕莉, 姚松林, 王莹, 王济红. 贵州4个县域豹皮樟老鹰茶的理化品质比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 142-149. |
[4] | 乔亚丽, 郁继华, 李旺雄, 金宁, 金莉, 吕剑, 肖雪梅, 唐中褀, 胡琳莉. 番茄果实不同采收时间矿质元素变化分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 430-436. |
[5] | 李乐, 田敏娇, 高艳明, 李建设. 硒肥对基质培番茄生长和矿质元素积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 253-261. |
[6] | 侯立娟, 林金盛, 刘少华, 李瑞祥, 马林, 蒋宁, 曲绍轩, 李辉平. 醋酸钠及复配4种矿物质对草菇菌丝生物量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(2): 228-235. |
[7] | 赵孟良, 钟启文, 刘明池, 李莉. 二十二份引进菊芋种质资源的叶片性状分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(7): 1151-1157. |
[8] | 明佳佳, 胡承孝, 赵小虎, 郑亚伟, 刘新伟, 赵泽, 赵园园, 贾玮. 硒对油菜各部位矿质元素含量及其迁移特征的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1564-1571. |
[9] | 尹明华,徐志坚,章省琴,吕思杰,曾艳红,付有章,夏瑾华,洪森荣*. 江西山药茎尖包埋玻璃化法超低温保存及其遗传稳定性检测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 984-. |
[10] | 袁继存,赵德英*,徐锴,程存刚. 辽砧2号中间砧对华红苹果不同部位养分含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(1): 70-. |
[11] | 郭秀珠,陈巍,潘君慧,黄品湖,徐文荣. 瓯柑果实发育过程中糖和矿质元素的积累[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(4): 892-. |
[12] | 周国燕;张建军;李炫辰. 高果糖浆含量对椴树蜂蜜玻璃化转变温度的影响[J]. , 2014, 26(1): 0-180. |
[13] | 何景福;段卫东;张大纯;赵云飞;胡战军;孙曙光;叶协锋;*. 河南植烟土壤与烟叶矿质元素关系分析[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-146. |
[14] | 张朝辉;王豹祥;席淑雅;刘天翔;曹育博;邱立友;*. 一株烤烟根际解钾细菌的鉴定及其在烤烟生产中的应用[J]. , 2011, 23(3): 0-558. |
[15] | 李宁;苏淑钗;景淼;陆小辉;杨超;佟丽文;刘姝颖;姜黎黎. 榛子叶片内矿质营养元素的动态变化[J]. , 2011, 23(2): 0-312. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||