浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 2277-2285.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.10.22
李红梅1(), 陆胜民1,2,*(
), 郑美瑜2, 曹风2, 张文娟2, 董明盛1
收稿日期:
2021-01-13
出版日期:
2022-10-25
发布日期:
2022-10-26
通讯作者:
陆胜民
作者简介:
*陆胜民,E-mail: lushengmin@hotmail.com基金资助:
LI Hongmei1(), LU Shengmin1,2,*(
), ZHENG Meiyu2, CAO Feng2, ZHANG Wenjuan2, DONG Mingsheng1
Received:
2021-01-13
Online:
2022-10-25
Published:
2022-10-26
Contact:
LU Shengmin
摘要:
为延长枇杷产业链、提高其附加值,对浙江主栽的软条白沙、大红袍枇杷果实进行果膏加工适应性和品质性状比较研究,筛选适宜品种,并研究果浆加酶处理和浓缩程度对该品种果实出汁率,果膏出膏率,总酸、总酚和总黄酮含量,自由基清除能力,色度值和感官评分的影响,确定果膏加工的关键工艺。结果表明,软条白沙枇杷的出汁率为53.18%,出膏率为20.54%,果膏总酸含量为6.70 g·L-1;大红袍枇杷的出汁率为39.88%,出膏率为15.23%,果膏总酸含量为7.64 g·L-1,故软条白沙枇杷的加工适应性较好。软条白沙枇杷打浆后加果胶酶和纤维素酶出膏率可提高6.35百分点;果膏中总酚和总黄酮含量、自由基清除能力随可溶性固形物含量增加而提高,从50%浓缩至80%,总酚和总黄酮含量分别提高了242%和211%,1,1-二苯基-2-三硝基苯肼(1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, DPPH)和2,2'-联氮-双-3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸[2, 2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), ABTS]自由基清除能力分别提高了1.88、15.26百分点。综合考虑品质性状、产率和节能,建议枇杷果膏加工宜选择软条白沙枇杷为原料,榨汁前加酶处理,将果膏浓缩至可溶性固形物含量为70%。
中图分类号:
李红梅, 陆胜民, 郑美瑜, 曹风, 张文娟, 董明盛. 浙江2个主栽枇杷品种加工果膏的品质性状比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2277-2285.
LI Hongmei, LU Shengmin, ZHENG Meiyu, CAO Feng, ZHANG Wenjuan, DONG Mingsheng. Comparison on qualitative characters of fruit paste processed using two main loquat varieties cultivated in Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2277-2285.
指标 Index | 评分标准 Scoring criteria | 分值 Score |
---|---|---|
色泽Color | 色泽均匀,呈鲜亮的琥珀色 Uniform color, bright amber | 16~20 |
色泽均匀,颜色不够鲜亮 The color is uniform, but not bright enough | 8~15 | |
色泽暗淡 Dull color | 0~7 | |
滋味Taste | 清香可口,酸甜适中 Delicious, with moderate acidity and sweetness | 24~30 |
有香味,偏酸或偏甜 Fragrant, sour or sweet | 18~23 | |
香味不明显,甜腻或酸苦 The fragrance is not obvious, sweet or sour | 0~17 | |
气味Smell | 有枇杷清香,无焦糊味 Loquat fragrance and no burnt flavor | 24~30 |
香气较淡,轻微焦糊味 The aroma is light and slightly burnt | 18~23 | |
几乎无香气,焦糊味严重 Almost no aroma, severely burnt taste | 0~17 | |
状态State | 半透明膏状,状态均匀,流动性适中 Translucent paste, uniform state and moderate fluidity | 16~20 |
半透明膏状,状态均匀,偏稀或偏浓 Translucent paste, uniform, thin or thick | 8~15 | |
半透明膏状,过于黏稠或流体状 Translucent paste, too viscous or fluid | 0~7 |
表1 枇杷果膏评定标准
Table 1 Evaluation standard of loquat fruit paste
指标 Index | 评分标准 Scoring criteria | 分值 Score |
---|---|---|
色泽Color | 色泽均匀,呈鲜亮的琥珀色 Uniform color, bright amber | 16~20 |
色泽均匀,颜色不够鲜亮 The color is uniform, but not bright enough | 8~15 | |
色泽暗淡 Dull color | 0~7 | |
滋味Taste | 清香可口,酸甜适中 Delicious, with moderate acidity and sweetness | 24~30 |
有香味,偏酸或偏甜 Fragrant, sour or sweet | 18~23 | |
香味不明显,甜腻或酸苦 The fragrance is not obvious, sweet or sour | 0~17 | |
气味Smell | 有枇杷清香,无焦糊味 Loquat fragrance and no burnt flavor | 24~30 |
香气较淡,轻微焦糊味 The aroma is light and slightly burnt | 18~23 | |
几乎无香气,焦糊味严重 Almost no aroma, severely burnt taste | 0~17 | |
状态State | 半透明膏状,状态均匀,流动性适中 Translucent paste, uniform state and moderate fluidity | 16~20 |
半透明膏状,状态均匀,偏稀或偏浓 Translucent paste, uniform, thin or thick | 8~15 | |
半透明膏状,过于黏稠或流体状 Translucent paste, too viscous or fluid | 0~7 |
指标 Index | 果实/果膏质量 Fruit/cream mass/g | 出汁率/出膏率 Juice/paste yield/% | 总酸 Total acid content/(g·L-1) | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
白枇杷汁White loquat juice | 334.04±4.29 a | 53.18±1.20 a | 1.34±0.23 d | 11.5±0.1 b |
红枇杷汁Red loquat juice | 305.78±1.46 b | 39.88±0.71 b | 2.21±0.21 c | 11.1±0.1 b |
白枇杷果膏White loquat fruit paste | 70.19±1.84 c | 20.54±1.31 c | 6.70±0.23 b | 68.5±1.4 a |
红枇杷果膏Red loquat fruit paste | 39.30±3.88 d | 15.23±0.88 d | 7.64±0.40 a | 68.8±1.2 a |
表2 不同枇杷品种果汁和果膏的理化指标对比
Table 2 Comparison of physical and chemical indexes of juice and fruit paste of different loquat varieties
指标 Index | 果实/果膏质量 Fruit/cream mass/g | 出汁率/出膏率 Juice/paste yield/% | 总酸 Total acid content/(g·L-1) | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
白枇杷汁White loquat juice | 334.04±4.29 a | 53.18±1.20 a | 1.34±0.23 d | 11.5±0.1 b |
红枇杷汁Red loquat juice | 305.78±1.46 b | 39.88±0.71 b | 2.21±0.21 c | 11.1±0.1 b |
白枇杷果膏White loquat fruit paste | 70.19±1.84 c | 20.54±1.31 c | 6.70±0.23 b | 68.5±1.4 a |
红枇杷果膏Red loquat fruit paste | 39.30±3.88 d | 15.23±0.88 d | 7.64±0.40 a | 68.8±1.2 a |
图1 不同品种枇杷果汁和果膏自由基清除能力的差异同一图例上无相同小写字母表示组间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Differences of free radical scavenging abilities of fruit juice and fruit paste of different loquat varieties Different lowercase letters on the same legend indicated significant differences between groups (P<0.05). The same as below.
图2 不同品种枇杷果汁和果膏中总酚、总黄酮含量的差异
Fig.2 Differences of total phenols and total flavonoids contents of fruit juice and fruit paste of different loquat varieties
种类Type | 色泽Color | 滋味Taste | 气味Smell | 状态State | 总分Total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
白枇杷果膏White loquat fruit paste | 16.8±1.5 a | 21.6±1.8 a | 24.0±1.2 a | 16.8±1.6 b | 79.2±3.1 a |
红枇杷果膏Red loquat fruit paste | 16.0±1.7 a | 19.7±1.9 b | 22.6±1.6 b | 15.9±1.3 b | 74.2±2.7 b |
表3 不同品种的枇杷果膏感官评分值
Table 3 Sensory scores of loquat fruit paste of different varieties
种类Type | 色泽Color | 滋味Taste | 气味Smell | 状态State | 总分Total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
白枇杷果膏White loquat fruit paste | 16.8±1.5 a | 21.6±1.8 a | 24.0±1.2 a | 16.8±1.6 b | 79.2±3.1 a |
红枇杷果膏Red loquat fruit paste | 16.0±1.7 a | 19.7±1.9 b | 22.6±1.6 b | 15.9±1.3 b | 74.2±2.7 b |
处理 Treatment | 出汁率 Juice yield/% | 出膏率 Paste yield/% | 总酸含量 The total acid content/ (mg·L-1) | ABTS自由基 清除能力 ABTS radical scavenging ability/% | DPPH自由基 清除能力 DPPH radical scavenging ability/% | 总酚含量 Total phenol content/ (mg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量 Total flavonoids content/ (mg·g-1) | 感官评定 分数 Sensory evaluation score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
加酶 Enzyme treatment | 63.29±0.82 a | 25.49±0.44 a | 6.43±0.69 a | 62.50±1.15 a | 65.38±1.41 a | 5.89±0.28 a | 19.64±1.71 a | 78.6±3.7 a |
对照组 Control group | 53.94±1.63 b | 19.14±1.60 b | 6.70±0.23 a | 61.00±0.74 a | 65.44±1.47 a | 5.14±0.80 a | 19.79±0.96 a | 78.4±3.5 a |
表4 不同榨汁前处理方式对枇杷果膏的影响
Table 4 Effects of different pretreatment methods on loquat fruit paste
处理 Treatment | 出汁率 Juice yield/% | 出膏率 Paste yield/% | 总酸含量 The total acid content/ (mg·L-1) | ABTS自由基 清除能力 ABTS radical scavenging ability/% | DPPH自由基 清除能力 DPPH radical scavenging ability/% | 总酚含量 Total phenol content/ (mg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量 Total flavonoids content/ (mg·g-1) | 感官评定 分数 Sensory evaluation score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
加酶 Enzyme treatment | 63.29±0.82 a | 25.49±0.44 a | 6.43±0.69 a | 62.50±1.15 a | 65.38±1.41 a | 5.89±0.28 a | 19.64±1.71 a | 78.6±3.7 a |
对照组 Control group | 53.94±1.63 b | 19.14±1.60 b | 6.70±0.23 a | 61.00±0.74 a | 65.44±1.47 a | 5.14±0.80 a | 19.79±0.96 a | 78.4±3.5 a |
可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solid content/% | 色泽 Color | 滋味 Taste | 气味 Smell | 状态 State | 总分 Total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 15.7±1.4 c | 17.0±1.8 c | 23.7±2.3 a | 13.2±2.4 b | 69.6±4.1 c |
60 | 16.9±1.0 b | 21.5±2.4 ab | 22.4±1.9 a | 15.9±1.0 a | 76.7±3.3 b |
70 | 17.9±1.2 ab | 22.3±2.0 a | 23.3±1.8 a | 16.7±0.7 a | 80.2±3.6 a |
80 | 18.5±1.0 a | 20.0±2.1 b | 21.3±2.1 a | 8.3±1.3 c | 68.1±1.8 c |
表5 可溶性固形物含量对枇杷果膏感官评分的影响
Table 5 Effects of total soluble solid content on sensory scores of loquat fruit paste
可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solid content/% | 色泽 Color | 滋味 Taste | 气味 Smell | 状态 State | 总分 Total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 15.7±1.4 c | 17.0±1.8 c | 23.7±2.3 a | 13.2±2.4 b | 69.6±4.1 c |
60 | 16.9±1.0 b | 21.5±2.4 ab | 22.4±1.9 a | 15.9±1.0 a | 76.7±3.3 b |
70 | 17.9±1.2 ab | 22.3±2.0 a | 23.3±1.8 a | 16.7±0.7 a | 80.2±3.6 a |
80 | 18.5±1.0 a | 20.0±2.1 b | 21.3±2.1 a | 8.3±1.3 c | 68.1±1.8 c |
[1] | 罗吉庆, 张永杰, 江丽慧, 等. 枇杷营养价值和功能价值的应用研究[J]. 农产品加工, 2021(4): 83-87. |
LUO J Q, ZHANG Y J, JIANG L H, et al. Application of nutritional and functional value of Eriobotrya japonica[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2021(4): 83-87. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 朱作艺, 姜遥, 姚佳蓉, 等. 浙江枇杷营养品质分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(12): 2360-2362. |
ZHU Z Y, JIANG Y, YAO J R, et al. Nutrient quality analysis of loquat in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 62(12): 2360-2362. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 刘丽丽, 刘玉垠, 王杰, 等. 枇杷功能成分及生物活性研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(5): 306-314. |
LIU L L, LIU Y Y, WANG J, et al. A review of functional components and bioactivities in loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.)[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(5): 306-314. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] |
LIN J Y, TANG C Y. Strawberry, loquat, mulberry, and bitter melon juices exhibit prophylactic effects on LPS-induced inflammation using murine peritoneal macrophages[J]. Food Chemistry, 2008, 107(4): 1587-1596.
DOI URL |
[5] |
LEE H, KIM Y K, LEE H J, et al. Effects of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) ethanol extracts of different aerial parts on antioxidant activity and antiproliferation of human cancer cells[J]. The Korean Journal of Community Living Science, 2016, 27(2): 211-220.
DOI URL |
[6] | BANNO N, AKIHISA T, TOKUDA H, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antitumor-promoting effects of the triterpene acids from the leaves of Eriobotrya japonica[J]. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2005, 28(10): 1995-1999. |
[7] | 严燕. 枇杷膏加工工艺及其抗氧化特性的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2012. |
YAN Y. Study on the processing technology and the oxidation characteristics of loquat paste[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 左丽丽, 任婷婷, 勾文哲, 等. 狗枣猕猴桃果汁加工工艺的优化[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2019, 32(5): 30-33. |
ZUO L L, REN T T, GOU W Z, et al. Optimization of processing technology of Actinidia kolomikta juice[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2019, 32(5): 30-33. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 孟然. 南果梨膏加工工艺及其镇咳功效的初步研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018. |
MENG R. Primary research on processing technology and antitussive efficacy of Nanguo pear paste[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 食品中总酸的测定: GB/T 12456—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
[11] | 李帆, 邢珂慧, 邵佩兰, 等. 红枣色素与枣多糖的协同抗氧化作用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(9): 13-17. |
LI F, XING K H, SHAO P L, et al. Synergistic antioxidant effects of pigments and polysaccharides from jujube[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(9): 13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 刘玉明, 李珂娴, 何颖, 等. 枇杷花水提液总酚含量的Folin-Ciocalteu法测定[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2017, 28(4): 838-840. |
LIU Y M, LI K X, HE Y, et al. Determination of total phenols content in water extract of flowers of Eriobotrya japonica(Thunb.) Lindl. by Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method[J]. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, 2017, 28(4): 838-840. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 李茜, 信学雷, 阿吉艾克拜尔·艾萨. 洋甘菊总黄酮提取工艺研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2021, 36(4): 2342-2344. |
LI Q, XIN X L, Haji Akber A. Study on extraction technology of total flavonoids from Matricarla chamomilla L[J]. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, 2021, 36(4): 2342-2344. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 安徽省食品行业协会. 砀山梨膏: T/AHFIA 037—2019[S/OL]. [2021-01-10]. http://www.ttbz.org.cn/StandardManage/Detail/36052/. |
[15] | 孙加刚, 康雨薇, 邵俊锋, 等. 真空微油炸杏鲍菇脆片的工艺优化[J]. 中国调味品, 2021(10):109-113. |
SUN J G, KANG Y W, SHAO J F, et al. Optimization of vacuum micro-frying process of Pleurotus eryngii crisps[J]. China Condiment, 2021(10):109-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 张劲, 黄丽, 夏宁, 等. 6个芒果品种品质特性评价研究[J]. 食品科技, 2011, 36(9): 65-69. |
ZHANG J, HUANG L, XIA N, et al. Evaluation of six mango cultivars by fruit quality characters[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2011, 36(9): 65-69. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 郑金德. 啤酒类黑精及其抗氧化活性的初步研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2017. |
ZHENG J D. Preliminary study on beer melanoidins and its antioxidant activity[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 安玉红, 卢秀. 单宁酶和果胶酶联合酶解刺梨榨汁工艺的研究[J]. 农产品加工, 2021(22): 27-31. |
AN Y H, LU X. Study on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Rosa roxbunghii juice extraction process with tanninase and pectinase[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2021(22): 27-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 魏鑫, 郭丹, 王宏光, 等. 低温贮藏对蓝莓果实品质与主要成分的影响[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2021(5): 29-33. |
WEI X, GUO D, WANG H G, et al. Effects of low temperature storage on quality and pricipal component of blueberry[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology and Equipment, 2021(5): 29-33. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 郭红辉, 简在海, 贾克功. 冻藏龙眼果皮细胞膜透性、PPO活性和酚类物质含量的变化[J]. 湛江海洋大学学报, 2003, 23(6): 64-68. |
GUO H H, JIAN Z H, JIA K G. Membrane permeability, PPO activity and total phenol content changes in freezing-stored longan fruits’ pericarp[J]. Journal of Zhanjiang Ocean University, 2003, 23(6): 64-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 步营, 胡显杰, 刘瑛楠, 等. 两种浓缩方式对扇贝蒸煮液色泽及挥发性风味物质的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2019, 44(12): 12-17. |
BU Y, HU X J, LIU Y N, et al. Effects of two concentration methods on the color and volatile flavor compounds of scallop cooking liquor[J]. China Condiment, 2019, 44(12): 12-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] |
NOOSHKAM M, VARIDI M, BASHASH M. The Maillard reaction products as food-born antioxidant and antibrowning agents in model and real food systems[J]. Food Chemistry, 2019, 275: 644-660.
DOI PMID |
[23] | 闫芳. 壳寡糖-氨基酸美拉德反应产物的优化制备及性能研究[D]. 天津: 河北工业大学, 2018. |
YAN F. Optimized preparation and properties of chitooligosaccharide-amino acid Maillard reaction products[D]. Tianjin: Hebei University of Technology, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | GOH S G, NORANIZAN M, LEONG C M, et al. Effect of thermal and ultraviolet treatments on the stability of antioxidant compounds in single strength pineapple juice throughout refrigerated storage[J]. International Food Research Journal, 2012, 19(3): 1131. |
[25] | BRUIJN J, LOYOLA C, AQUEVEQUE P, et al. Influence of heat treatment on the antioxidant properties of Grifola gargal hydro-alcoholic extracts[J]. Micologia Aplicada International, 2008, 20(1): 27-34. |
[1] | 谌迪, 肖朝耿, 卢文静, 叶沁, 王飞. 不同热处理方法对休闲松子品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 808-813. |
[2] | 唐晓姝, 胡博, 陈雪梅, 张白曦. 黑果腺肋花楸榨汁工艺研究与果汁品质评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2406-2414. |
[3] | 唐伟敏, 邢建荣, 杨颖, 向露, 王思农, 陆胜民. 四种杂柑全果饮品的加工适应性与贮藏特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 483-489. |
[4] | 高帆, 夏惠, 袁雪侦, 黄守义, 刘继, 梁东. 外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下猕猴桃幼苗酚类物质含量和抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(7): 1144-1150. |
[5] | 高帆, 夏惠, 王秀, 王进, 周琼, 吕秀兰, 梁东. 不同甜樱桃品种抗氧化物质及抗氧化活性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 926-932. |
[6] | 周金星, 靳二辉, 刘文举, 张超超, 王思飞, 金光明. 复方中药制剂对SD大鼠血清抗氧化功能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(5): 737-743. |
[7] | 贾亚鹏, 张俊, 陆胜民. 衢州地区柑橘品种罐头加工适应性初探[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(2): 323-331. |
[8] | 刘泽静,薛生玲,夏雪,田玉肖,张芬,陈清,汤浩茹,孙勃*. 鱼腥草不同部位生物活性物质和抗氧化能力分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 992-. |
[9] | 刘红露,范磊,戴茜茜, 张飞燕,潘康成*. 面包酵母硒与酪酸梭菌制剂对肉鸡生长、抗氧化和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(9): 1529-. |
[10] | 杜金梁1,2,曹丽萍1,2,刘英娟3,赵才源3,申玉金3,丁炜东1,2,殷国俊1,2,3,*. TCDD对建鲤肝脏的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(10): 1720-. |
[11] | 潘冰燕1,鲁晓翔1,*,张鹏2,李江阔2,陈绍慧2. 基于改进偏最小二乘法的甜椒可溶性固形物和总酸的近红外光谱检测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(10): 1739-. |
[12] | 汪炳良,房婷婷,叶红霞*,石瑜. 栽培方式对哈密瓜光合速率和果实产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(4): 896-. |
[13] | 钱卓权;殷皓臻;黄晓林;林少珍;南海函;*. 三种海藻抑菌活性和抗氧化活性[J]. , 2014, 26(2): 0-384387. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||