浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 2676-2686.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240222
何玲钰1(), 乔贤1,2, 王新越1, 李祥龙1,2,*(
)
收稿日期:
2024-03-08
出版日期:
2024-12-25
发布日期:
2024-12-27
作者简介:
何玲钰(1999—),女,河北石家庄人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物遗传育种。E-mail:h19943450526@163.com
通讯作者:
*李祥龙,E-mail:15203358192@163.com
基金资助:
HE Lingyu1(), QIAO Xian1,2, WANG Xinyue1, LI Xianglong1,2,*(
)
Received:
2024-03-08
Online:
2024-12-25
Published:
2024-12-27
摘要:
为寻找与改良坝上长尾鸡肌肉肌苷酸(inosine monophosphate,IMP)含量的基因,试验选取河北省优质蛋肉兼用型品种坝上长尾鸡为对象,对60只进行解剖测得肌苷酸含量,以坝上长尾鸡肌苷酸含量高低为指标分组,利用转录组测序进行差异表达基因分析和KEGG通路富集,并利用PCR扩增和测序技术,进行多态位点的筛查,使用SPSS中的单因素方差分析与肌苷酸含量进行关联分析。结果表明,转录组测序分析中差异显著表达基因中有251个上调基因、241个下调基因,另有18 300个差异不显著,对差异基因进行KEGG通路富集分析,发现核苷酸代谢途径对肌苷酸的含量有着重要影响,ADSL基因参与该通路最终影响肌苷酸的合成。成功扩增ADSL基因第2、7、9、11外显子,筛查到g.3713G>A,g.3797C>T,g.8282C>G,g.10191C>T,g.12827C>A,其中外显子2(g.3797C>T)CT型IMP含量显著(P<0.05)高于CC型与TT型,外显子7(g.8282C>G)CG型IMP含量显著(P<0.05)高于GG型及CC型,说明坝上长尾鸡ADSL基因第2外显子g.3797C>T位点CT型及第7外显子g.8282C>G位点CG型为优势基因型,可作为IMP含量的分子标记用于育种实践。
中图分类号:
何玲钰, 乔贤, 王新越, 李祥龙. 基于转录组与一代测序技术挖掘ADSL基因调控坝上长尾鸡肌苷酸含量[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2676-2686.
HE Lingyu, QIAO Xian, WANG Xinyue, LI Xianglong. Exploring ADSL gene regulation of inosine monophosphate content in Bashang long tail chicken based on transcriptome and next-generation sequencing technology[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(12): 2676-2686.
样品编号(A组) Sample name (Group A) | 肌苷酸含量 Inosine monophosphate content/(mg·kg-1) | 样品编号(B组) Sample name (Group B) | 肌苷酸含量 Inosine monophosphate content/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 183.73 | 6 | 11.28 |
2 | 1 601.84 | 7 | 17.71 |
3 | 1 173.14 | 8 | 12.43 |
4 | 1 246.67 | 9 | 13.21 |
5 | 1 153.34 | 10 | 14.01 |
表1 试验动物分组情况及肌苷酸含量数据
Table 1 Grouping of experimental animals and data of inosine monophosphate content
样品编号(A组) Sample name (Group A) | 肌苷酸含量 Inosine monophosphate content/(mg·kg-1) | 样品编号(B组) Sample name (Group B) | 肌苷酸含量 Inosine monophosphate content/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 183.73 | 6 | 11.28 |
2 | 1 601.84 | 7 | 17.71 |
3 | 1 173.14 | 8 | 12.43 |
4 | 1 246.67 | 9 | 13.21 |
5 | 1 153.34 | 10 | 14.01 |
基因 Gene | SNP位点 SNP site | 引物序列 Primer sequences(5'→3') | 产物大小 Product size/bp | 退火温度 Annealing temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
ADSL(AY665559.1) | 37133797 | F:CTTTTGACTGCCCCATTGCC R:AAAGGGAGAAGCCACAGGAG | 278 | 57.2 |
8282 | F:CTTTCATTCCCACTTGCGGC R:GCTTGGACCAATTCAGCACA | 333 | 56.0 | |
10191 | F:TCCCCACCGCATTTAGATGT R:GTCTGCTTTTCATCAAGACGGT | 192 | 56.4 | |
12827 | F:TCCACAGTAACGTTCCAGACA R:TTCACAGAAGGAAAGCGCCT | 341 | 56.9 |
表2 ADSL引物序列及产物大小
Table 2 ADSL primer sequence and product size
基因 Gene | SNP位点 SNP site | 引物序列 Primer sequences(5'→3') | 产物大小 Product size/bp | 退火温度 Annealing temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
ADSL(AY665559.1) | 37133797 | F:CTTTTGACTGCCCCATTGCC R:AAAGGGAGAAGCCACAGGAG | 278 | 57.2 |
8282 | F:CTTTCATTCCCACTTGCGGC R:GCTTGGACCAATTCAGCACA | 333 | 56.0 | |
10191 | F:TCCCCACCGCATTTAGATGT R:GTCTGCTTTTCATCAAGACGGT | 192 | 56.4 | |
12827 | F:TCCACAGTAACGTTCCAGACA R:TTCACAGAAGGAAAGCGCCT | 341 | 56.9 |
样品名称 Sample name | 浓度 Concentration/ (ng·μL-1) | D260/D280 | RNA完整值 RNA integrity number(RIN) |
---|---|---|---|
A1 | 139 | 2.006 | 6.8 |
A2 | 156 | 2.012 | 7.5 |
A3 | 128 | 2.000 | 8.2 |
A4 | 132 | 1.982 | 7.9 |
A5 | 152 | 2.003 | 8.3 |
B1 | 161 | 2.036 | 7.7 |
B2 | 137 | 1.908 | 8.5 |
B3 | 166 | 2.016 | 8.3 |
B4 | 159 | 2.027 | 9.1 |
B5 | 118 | 1.968 | 8.6 |
表3 RNA质量
Table 3 The quality of RNA
样品名称 Sample name | 浓度 Concentration/ (ng·μL-1) | D260/D280 | RNA完整值 RNA integrity number(RIN) |
---|---|---|---|
A1 | 139 | 2.006 | 6.8 |
A2 | 156 | 2.012 | 7.5 |
A3 | 128 | 2.000 | 8.2 |
A4 | 132 | 1.982 | 7.9 |
A5 | 152 | 2.003 | 8.3 |
B1 | 161 | 2.036 | 7.7 |
B2 | 137 | 1.908 | 8.5 |
B3 | 166 | 2.016 | 8.3 |
B4 | 159 | 2.027 | 9.1 |
B5 | 118 | 1.968 | 8.6 |
样本 Sample | 原始reads Raw reads | 过滤后reads Clean reads | 过滤后碱基 Clean bases/Gb | 错误发现率 False discovery rate/% | Q20% | Q30% | GC含量 GC content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 50 728 000 | 48 889 916 | 7.33 | 0.03 | 97.39 | 93.09 | 51.85 |
A2 | 42 785 508 | 40 886 724 | 6.13 | 0.03 | 97.28 | 92.85 | 51.58 |
A3 | 47 588 060 | 45 744 878 | 6.86 | 0.03 | 97.19 | 92.63 | 52.19 |
A4 | 52 503 284 | 50 632 380 | 7.59 | 0.03 | 96.72 | 91.73 | 50.37 |
A5 | 43 447 046 | 41 692 442 | 6.25 | 0.03 | 97.44 | 93.39 | 52.31 |
B1 | 46 702 784 | 44 980 912 | 6.75 | 0.03 | 97.29 | 92.8 | 52.23 |
B2 | 41 813 830 | 40 168 072 | 6.03 | 0.03 | 97.28 | 92.84 | 52.61 |
B3 | 43 513 932 | 42 487 038 | 6.37 | 0.03 | 96.88 | 91.9 | 52.94 |
B4 | 45 702 690 | 44 466 824 | 6.67 | 0.03 | 97.03 | 92.29 | 50.88 |
B5 | 46 914 640 | 45 820 392 | 6.87 | 0.03 | 97.37 | 93.1 | 52.39 |
表4 测序数据质量
Table 4 Quality of sequencing data
样本 Sample | 原始reads Raw reads | 过滤后reads Clean reads | 过滤后碱基 Clean bases/Gb | 错误发现率 False discovery rate/% | Q20% | Q30% | GC含量 GC content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 50 728 000 | 48 889 916 | 7.33 | 0.03 | 97.39 | 93.09 | 51.85 |
A2 | 42 785 508 | 40 886 724 | 6.13 | 0.03 | 97.28 | 92.85 | 51.58 |
A3 | 47 588 060 | 45 744 878 | 6.86 | 0.03 | 97.19 | 92.63 | 52.19 |
A4 | 52 503 284 | 50 632 380 | 7.59 | 0.03 | 96.72 | 91.73 | 50.37 |
A5 | 43 447 046 | 41 692 442 | 6.25 | 0.03 | 97.44 | 93.39 | 52.31 |
B1 | 46 702 784 | 44 980 912 | 6.75 | 0.03 | 97.29 | 92.8 | 52.23 |
B2 | 41 813 830 | 40 168 072 | 6.03 | 0.03 | 97.28 | 92.84 | 52.61 |
B3 | 43 513 932 | 42 487 038 | 6.37 | 0.03 | 96.88 | 91.9 | 52.94 |
B4 | 45 702 690 | 44 466 824 | 6.67 | 0.03 | 97.03 | 92.29 | 50.88 |
B5 | 46 914 640 | 45 820 392 | 6.87 | 0.03 | 97.37 | 93.1 | 52.39 |
SNP位点 SNP site | 基因型频率(个体数) Genotype frequency | 基因频率 Allele frequency | PIC | χ2 | P值 P value | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | AG | GG | CG | CC | CT | TT | A | G | C | T | ||||
g.3713G>A | 0.61(32) | 0.30(16) | 0.09(5) | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 15.07 | 0.00 | ||||||
g.3797C>T | 0.54(28) | 0.15(8) | 0.31(16) | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 23.82 | — | ||||||
g.8282C>G | 0.46(25) | 0.39(21) | 0.15(8) | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 1.48 | 0.48 | ||||||
g.10191C>T | 0.92(49) | 0.08(4) | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 1.00 | — | |||||||
g.12827C>A | 0.06(3) | 0.94(50) | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0.11 | 5.33 | 0.07 |
表5 ADSL基因各SNP位点基因型及基因频率
Table 5 Genotype and gene frequency of ADSL gene sites
SNP位点 SNP site | 基因型频率(个体数) Genotype frequency | 基因频率 Allele frequency | PIC | χ2 | P值 P value | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | AG | GG | CG | CC | CT | TT | A | G | C | T | ||||
g.3713G>A | 0.61(32) | 0.30(16) | 0.09(5) | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 15.07 | 0.00 | ||||||
g.3797C>T | 0.54(28) | 0.15(8) | 0.31(16) | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 23.82 | — | ||||||
g.8282C>G | 0.46(25) | 0.39(21) | 0.15(8) | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 1.48 | 0.48 | ||||||
g.10191C>T | 0.92(49) | 0.08(4) | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 1.00 | — | |||||||
g.12827C>A | 0.06(3) | 0.94(50) | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0.11 | 5.33 | 0.07 |
SNP位点 SNP site | 基因型 Genotype | 样本 Sample size | 肌苷酸含量 IMP content/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|
g.3713G>A | AA | 32 | 2.2±3.5 |
AG | 16 | 4.2±4.8 | |
GG | 5 | 1.1±1.2 | |
g.3797C>T | CC | 28 | 2.1±3.2 a |
CT | 8 | 6.3±6.0 b | |
TT | 16 | 2.1±3.1 a | |
g.8282C>G | CC | 8 | 2.1±2.2 a |
CG | 21 | 4.2±5.1 b | |
GG | 25 | 1.5±2.4 a | |
g.10191C>T | CC | 49 | 2.8±4.0 |
CT | 4 | 1.4±1.1 | |
g.12827C>A | AA | 3 | 4.3±3.6 |
CC | 50 | 2.6±3.9 |
表6 不同位点基因型的个体腿肌肌苷酸含量
Table 6 Inosine content in leg muscle of individuals with different genotypes at different loci
SNP位点 SNP site | 基因型 Genotype | 样本 Sample size | 肌苷酸含量 IMP content/(g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|
g.3713G>A | AA | 32 | 2.2±3.5 |
AG | 16 | 4.2±4.8 | |
GG | 5 | 1.1±1.2 | |
g.3797C>T | CC | 28 | 2.1±3.2 a |
CT | 8 | 6.3±6.0 b | |
TT | 16 | 2.1±3.1 a | |
g.8282C>G | CC | 8 | 2.1±2.2 a |
CG | 21 | 4.2±5.1 b | |
GG | 25 | 1.5±2.4 a | |
g.10191C>T | CC | 49 | 2.8±4.0 |
CT | 4 | 1.4±1.1 | |
g.12827C>A | AA | 3 | 4.3±3.6 |
CC | 50 | 2.6±3.9 |
[1] | 徐英, 李石友, 李琦华, 等. 蛋白质水平对牛肉肌苷酸含量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2011, 24(1):294-296. |
XU Y, LI S Y, LI Q H, et al. Effect of protein levels on beef inosine acid content[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 24(1):294-296. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 王珏, 樊艳凤, 唐修君, 等. 不同品种肉鸡屠宰性能及肌肉品质的比较分析[J]. 中国家禽, 2020, 42(7):13-17. |
WANG J, FAN Y F, TANG X J, et al. Comparative analysis on slaughter characters and meat quality in different breeds of broilers[J]. China Poultry, 2020, 42(7):13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 王雪峰, 黄艾祥, 普岳红, 等. 云南剥隘鸡与河南肉鸡肌肉中肌苷酸含量的比较研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(9):2135-2140. |
WANG X F, HUANG A X, PU Y H, et al. Comparative study of inosinic acid concentration between Yunnan Boaichicken and Henan broiler[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2018, 9(9):2135-2140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 周小娟, 朱年华, 张日俊. 品种、日龄及饲养方式对鸡肉肌苷酸和肌内脂肪含量的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22(5):1251-1256. |
ZHOU X J, ZHU N H, ZHANG R J. Effects of breed, age and feeding regime on inosine-5'-monophosphate and intramuscular fat contents in broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 22(5):1251-1256. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 路宏朝, 张涛, 王令. 不同日龄略阳乌鸡肌肉中肌苷酸含量的变化规律[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(12):277-280. |
LU H C/Z, ZHANG T, WANG L. Changes of inosinic acid content in muscle of Lueyang black-bone chicken at different ages[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(12):277-280. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 王剑锋, 李爱华, 谢恺舟, 等. 不同日粮蛋能水平对京海黄鸡肌肉中肌苷酸和肌内脂肪沉积规律的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(3):803-805. |
WANG J F, LI A H, XIE K Z, et al. Effects of different protein and energy levels of diet on the deposition laws of inosine monophosphate and intramuscular fat in the muscles of Jinghai yellow chicken[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(3):803-805. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 李石友, 徐英, 李琦华, 等. 品种与日粮营养水平对鸡肉肌苷酸含量的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2007, 34(10):133-135. |
LI S Y, XU Y, LI Q H, et al. Effect of dietary nutritional levels on inosinic acid content of muscle of different chicken species[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2007, 34(10):133-135. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 杨烨, 冯玉兰, 李忠荣, 等. 性别和营养水平对福建河田鸡风味前体物质含量的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2006, 37(3):242-249. |
YANG Y, FENG Y L, LI Z R, et al. Effect of sex and diet nutrition on the contents of flavor precursors in Fujian Hetian chicken[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2006, 37(3):242-249. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 李文嘉, 孙全友, 魏凤仙, 等. 饲养方式对北京油鸡生长和屠宰性能、肉品质以及肌肉脂肪酸含量的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(4):1585-1595. |
LI W J, SUN Q Y, WEI F X, et al. Effects of different feeding patterns on growth and slaughter performance, meat quality and muscular fatty acid content of Beijing-you chickens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(4):1585-1595. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 彭月欣, 刘富来, 李颖诗, 等. 两种贮藏方法对鸡肉风味物质肌苷酸的含量比较[J]. 佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(2):58-63. |
PENG Y X, LIU F L, LI Y S, et al. Comparison of the contents of inosine monophosphate in chicken meat by two storage methods[J]. Journal of Foshan University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 37(2):58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 唐修君, 樊艳凤, 葛庆联, 等. 不同贮藏条件下鸡肉肌苷酸含量的变化规律[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(2):266-270. |
TANG X J, FAN Y F, GE Q L, et al. Change law of inosine acid in chicken muscle under different storage conditions[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(2):266-270. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | ZHANG T, LU H Z, WANG L, et al. Specific expression pattern of IMP metabolism related-genes in chicken muscle between cage and free range conditions[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(8):e0201736. |
[13] | ZHANG X D, ZHANG S J, DING Y Y, et al. Association between ADSL, GARS-AIRS-GART, DGAT1, and DECR1 expression levels and pork meat quality traits[J]. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2015, 14(4):14823-14830. |
[14] | RAY S P, DEATON M K, CAPODAGLI G C, et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of human adenylosuccinate lyase (ADSL) and the R303C ADSL deficiency-associated mutation[J]. Biochemistry, 2012, 51(33):6701-6713. |
[15] | 陈继兰, 文杰, 王述柏, 等. 鸡肉肌苷酸和肌内脂肪沉积规律研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2005, 36(8):843-845. |
CHEN J L, WEN J, WANG S B, et al. Studies on the characteristics of deposition of chicken IMP and IMF[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2005, 36(8):843-845. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 陈继兰. 鸡肉肌苷酸和肌内脂肪含量遗传规律及相关候选基因的研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2004. |
CHEN J L. Study on the genetic law of inosine monophosphate and intramuscular fat content in chicken and related candidate genes[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2004. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 石浩, 徐亚欧, 梅寒, 等. 米易鸡ADSL基因第2和第9外显子多态性与肌苷酸含量的关联[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(5):29-32. |
SHI H, XU Y O, MEI H, et al. Association between polymorphism of exon 2 and exon 9 of ADSL gene and inosine content in Miyi chicken[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(5):29-32. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 李岩, 张梅, 张苗苗, 等. 巨型玫瑰冠鸡ADSL基因对IMP的影响以及多态性的分析[C]// 中国畜牧兽医学会.中国畜牧兽医学会2018年学术年会禽病学分会第十九次学术研讨会论文集,2018:296. |
[19] | 季从亮. 鸡肉IMP含量相关候选基因SNP筛查及其用于地方鸡种群体遗传结构分析的研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2005. |
JI C L. SNP screening in the related candidate genes for IMP contents of chicken and its application in assessment of genetic structure of indigenous chicken breeds[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2005. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | ANDERS S, HUBER W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data[J]. Genome Biology, 2010, 11(10):R106. |
[21] | KANEHISA M, GOTO S. KEGG Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, 28(1):27-30. |
[22] | 王晓方, 常文环, 刘国华, 等. 畜禽肌肉肌苷酸研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2012, 39(5):221-225. |
WANG X F, CHANG W H, LIU G H, et al. Recent advances on inosinic acid of animal muscle[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 39(5):221-225. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 吕东坡, 朱仁俊. 肌苷酸的研究现状及展望[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2007, 18(6):53-56. |
LYU D P, ZHU R J. The status and potential using on IMP[J]. China Food Additives, 2007, 18(6):53-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 谭海. 环磷酸腺苷补救合成的限制因素及高产发酵策略研究[D]. 新乡: 河南科技学院, 2022. |
TAN H. Study on limiting factors of cyclic adenosine monophosphate salvage synthesis and high-yield fermentation strategy[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Institute of Science and Technology, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 齐东东. 番鸭与北京鸭肉品质比较及肉质相关基因表达分析[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2023. |
QI D D. Comparison of meat quality between Muscovy duck and Beijing duck and analysis of meat quality related gene expression[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2023. | |
[26] | 喻世刚, 孙学良, 王钢, 等. ADSL基因启动子区遗传变异与鸡肉冻藏新鲜度的相关性分析[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47(11):3536-3545. |
YU S G, SUN X L, WANG G, et al. Association analysis between genetic variation in promoter region of ADSL gene and freshness of frozen chicken[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 47(11):3536-3545. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 栾德琴. 鸡肌肉生长相关基因的表达与肌苷酸关键酶基因网络调控的构建[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2012. |
LUAN D Q. Analysis of gene expression profiles and construction of network for key genes associated with inosine monophosphate in chicken muscles[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 张学余, 束婧婷, 季从亮, 等. 5个鸡种腺苷琥珀酸裂解酶(ADSL)基因外显子9 SNP及其与鸡肉肌苷酸含量的相关分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2007, 38(3):237-240. |
ZHANG X Y, SHU J T, JI C L, et al. Correlation analysis between single nucleotide polymorphism of the ADSL exon 9 and inosine monophosphate acid content in five chicken breeds[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2007, 38(3):237-240. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 束婧婷, 吉文林, 包文斌, 等. 鸡ADSL基因和GARS-AIRS-GART基因对鸡肉肌苷酸(IMP)含量的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2007, 38(8):786-791. |
SHU J T, JI W L, BAO W B, et al. The effect of ADSL and GARS-AIRS-GART genes on inosine monophosphate content in chicken meat[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2007, 38(8):786-791. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 豆腾飞, 汪善荣, 佟荟全, 等. 武定鸡和大围山微型鸡肌苷酸含量及ADSL基因表达差异研究[J]. 中国家禽, 2017, 39(14):7-10. |
DOU T F, WANG S R, TONG H Q, et al. Study on inosinic acid content and ADSL gene expression in Wuding chicken and Daweishan mini chicken[J]. China Poultry, 2017, 39(14):7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | WANG P, LI K Y, FAN Y K, et al. Association analysis and expression level of ACE polymorphisms with egg-laying trait in Taihang chicken[J]. Poultry Science, 2022, 101(11):102163. |
[1] | 谢梅琼, 王龙江, 何余容, 吕利华. 玫烟色棒束孢转录组测序及潜在致病相关基因分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2169-2180. |
[2] | 杨清, 刘胜红, 黄二宾, 杜嵘宇, 王芳, 邓佳. 经羧甲基壳聚糖诱导的葡萄柚果实转录组WRKY基因分析及抗性相关基因挖掘[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 598-614. |
[3] | 陈姿亦, 何盛盛, 闫晶男, 吴怡蓉, 张雨婷, 高有领. 宽体金线蛭提取物对HEK293细胞维甲酸诱导基因蛋白样受体(RLRs)通路的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(12): 2830-2843. |
[4] | 贺嵘, 赵恺, 贺玉娇, 阿拉腾苏和, 王爱君, 宁静, 韩若霜, 孙贵荣, 张国盛. 基于转录组测序与定量PCR技术挖掘北沙柳株型相关候选基因[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2332-2345. |
[5] | 梁倩蓉, 郑天伦, 陈小明, 朱凝瑜, 郑晓叶, 何润真, 曹飞飞, 薛辉利, 丁雪燕. 饲料中添加蝇蛆蛋白对中华鳖肝和血清免疫代谢应答的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2172-2181. |
[6] | 杨生海, 刘西兰, 张勇. 利用加权基因共表达网络分析牛口蹄疫病毒感染通路变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1617-1624. |
[7] | 葛金涛, 王江英, 赵文静, 邵小斌, 朱朋波, 汤雪燕, 孙明伟, 刘兴满. 魏可葡萄气生根发育的转录组分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1645-1655. |
[8] | 沈春修. 水稻LOC_Os10g05490位点冷胁迫条件下表达分析及CRISPR/Cas9定向编辑[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(2): 177-185. |
[9] | 杨敏, 黄巧, 陈良标. 南极鱼Ⅲ型抗冻基因真核表达质粒的构建及其细胞表达[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(11): 1862-1866. |
[10] | 路伏增1,罗卫斌1,盛春生2,徐如海1,戴丽荷1,姜红进1,褚晓红1,*. 生鲜猪肉鲜度指标评定及呈味核苷酸降解规律的研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(9): 1514-. |
[11] | 刘小辉1,2, 李祥龙1,*,李杰1,逯春香1. 坝上长尾鸡育雏育成期生长曲线拟合研究 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5): 746-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||