2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)的综合性状变化特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231436

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 2666-2675.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231436

2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)的综合性状变化特征

郭爱奎(), 梁志浩, 李宇星, 汪强, 程怡璠, 薛松, 于文青, 徐肖, 张英虎, 乔海龙, 杨红燕, 沈会权()

江苏沿海地区农业科学研究所,江苏盐城 224002

收稿日期:2023-12-26 出版日期:2024-12-25 发布日期:2024-12-27
作者简介:郭爱奎(1994—),男,甘肃定西人,硕士,研究实习员,从事大麦遗传育种研究。E-mail:gak16609326125@163.com
通讯作者: *沈会权,E-mail:jsycshq@163.com
基金资助:
国家大麦青稞产业技术体系(CARS-05);江苏现代农业(特粮特经)产业技术体系盐城推广示范基地(JATS〔2023〕214);盐城市科技局项目(YCBK2023023);盐城市科技局项目(YCBK2023065)

Change characteristics of comprehensive traits of barley varieties (strains) in the comparative identification tests in coastal areas of Jiangsu Province of China from 2007 to 2021

GUO Aikui(), LIANG Zhihao, LI Yuxing, WANG Qiang, CHENG Yifan, XUE Song, YU Wenqing, XU Xiao, ZHANG Yinghu, QIAO Hailong, YANG Hongyan, SHEN Huiquan()

Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yancheng 224002, Jiangsu, China

Received:2023-12-26 Online:2024-12-25 Published:2024-12-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

江苏沿海地区大麦生产处于国内领先水平,探讨江苏沿海地区大麦品种(系)主要性状的变化规律对提高我国大麦产量和品质具有重要借鉴意义。本研究基于2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验数据,综合运用线性回归分析、通径分析和相关性分析等方法,研究了近15年江苏沿海地区大麦品种(系)农艺和品质性状的变化特征。结果表明: 2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)的株高、单位面积穗数、穗长、穗粒数、千粒重和产量均呈上升趋势,其中株高以年均0.69 cm的速度显著增高,单位面积穗数以年均7.05×10⁴ hm^-2显著增加,穗粒数年均增加0.12粒,千粒重年均增加0.26 g,产量年均增加27.58 kg·hm^-2,但生育期无显著变化。近年来江苏沿海地区选育的大麦品种(系)籽粒蛋白质含量呈下降趋势,选育了苏啤9号、苏啤11号、盐麦6号、盐麦7号和盐13215等籽粒蛋白质含量低于12.50%的优质大麦。产量三要素的协同发展是近15年江苏沿海地区大麦产量增加的关键驱动因素。然而,株高升高和极端天气频发导致大麦倒伏情况加剧是制约江苏沿海地区大麦产量进一步提升的主要原因。本研究揭示了近15年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)农艺和品质性状的变化特征,阐明了大麦主要农艺性状与产量之间的关系,可为我国大麦高产优质协同发展提供参考。

关键词: 大麦, 农艺性状, 品质性状, 品比鉴定

Abstract:

Barley production in Jiangsu coastal area is at the leading level in China. Investigating the evolutionary patterns of barley varieties (strains) and their main agronomic traits in the Jiangsu coastal areas over the past 15 years has great significant importance to barley production in China. Based on the statistical data from comparison and identification of barley varieties (strains) tests in Jiangsu coastal areas from 2007 to 2021, various methods including linear regression analysis, path analysis and correlation analysis were employed to study characteristics of changes in agronomic and quality traits of barley varieties (strains) in Jiangsu coastal areas over the past 15 years. The results indicate that:in recent 15 years, barley varieties (strains) in Jiangsu coastal areas showed an increased trend in plant height, spike length, spike numbers per unit area, kernel numbers per spike, 1 000-grain weight and yield, among which the plant height increased significantly at an average annual rate of 0.69 cm, and the spike numbers per unit area increased significantly at an average annual rate of 7.05×10⁴ hm^-2, the number of grains per spike increased by 0.12 grains per year, the average annual increase of 1 000-grain weight was 0.26 g and the average annual increase of yield was 27.58 kg·hm^-2. There was no significant change in growth period. In recent years, barley varieties (strains) bred in Jiangsu coastal areas have exhibited a decreasing trend in the protein content, and some high-quality barley varieties including S9, S11, Y6, Y7 and Y21 with protein content≤12.50%. The synergistic development of the three factors of yield was the key driving factor for the increase of barley yield in Jiangsu coastal areas in recent 15 years. However, the increased of plant height and frequent extreme weather which led to the worsening of barley collapse were the main reasons restricting the further improvement of barley yield in coastal areas of Jiangsu Province. This study revealed the characteristics of changes in agronomic and quality traits of barley varieties (strains) in Jiangsu coastal areas in the past 15 years, and elucidated the relationship between barley major traits and yield. It could provide reference for the coordinated development of high yield and high quality barley varieties in China.

Key words: barley, agronomic trait, quality character, varieties comparison and identification

中图分类号:

S512.3

郭爱奎, 梁志浩, 李宇星, 汪强, 程怡璠, 薛松, 于文青, 徐肖, 张英虎, 乔海龙, 杨红燕, 沈会权. 2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)的综合性状变化特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2666-2675.

GUO Aikui, LIANG Zhihao, LI Yuxing, WANG Qiang, CHENG Yifan, XUE Song, YU Wenqing, XU Xiao, ZHANG Yinghu, QIAO Hailong, YANG Hongyan, SHEN Huiquan. Change characteristics of comprehensive traits of barley varieties (strains) in the comparative identification tests in coastal areas of Jiangsu Province of China from 2007 to 2021[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(12): 2666-2675.

图/表 4

图1 2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)数量与占比 A,大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)的数量;B,大麦品比、鉴定试验品种(系)数量的占比。

Fig.1 Number and proportion of comparison and identification of barley varieties (strains) in Jiangsu coastal areas from 2007 to 2021 A, The number of varieties (strains) in barley variety comparison and identification test; B, The proportion of varieties (strains) in barley variety comparison and identification test.

图2 2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定品种(系)农艺性状随时间的变化规律

Fig.2 Patterns of agronomic traits of barley varieties (strains) in the comparison and identification tests in coastal areas of Jiangsu Province from 2007 to 2021

图3 近年来江苏沿海地区选育大麦品种(系)的蛋白质、淀粉和β-葡聚糖含量 S3,苏啤3号;S4,苏啤4号;S5,苏啤5号;S6,苏啤6号;S7,苏啤7号;S9,苏啤9号;S10,苏啤10号;S11,苏啤11号;Y6,盐麦6号;Y7,盐麦7号;S12,苏啤12号;S13,苏啤13号;S14,苏啤14号;Y21,盐13215(品系)。

Fig.3 Contents of protein, starch and β-glucan in barley varieties (strains) selected in Jiangsu coastal areas in recent years S3, Supi No. 3; S4, Supi No. 4; S5, Supi No. 5; S6, Supi No. 6; S7, Supi No. 7; S9, Supi No. 9; S10, Supi No. 10; S11, Supi No. 11; Y6, Yanmai 6; Y7, Yanmai 7; S12, Supi No. 12; S13, Supi No. 13; S14, Supi No. 14; Y21, Yan 13215 (strain).

图4 近15年江苏沿海地区大麦产量变化的通径分析虚线为农艺性状间的相关性;实线为农艺性状对产量通径系数;红线表示负值;黑线表示正值;SN,单位面积穗数;GW,千粒重;PH,株高;KN,穗粒数;SL,穗长。**,在0.01水平(双侧)上显著相关。

Fig.4 Analysis of driving factors of barley yield change in Jiangsu coastal areas in recent 15 years Dashed lines were correlation between agronomic traits; Solid line were path coefficient of agronomic traits on yield; Red line represented negative value; Black linerepresented positive value; SN, Spike numbers per unit area; GW, 1 000-grain weight; PH, Plant height; KN, Kernel numbers per spike; SL, Spike length. **, Significant correlation at 0.01 level (both sides).

参考文献 45

[1]	HAAS M, SCHREIBER M, MASCHER M. Domestication and crop evolution of wheat and barley:genes, genomics, and future directions[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2019, 61(3):204-225.
[2]	中国酒业协会啤酒分会. 2015年中国啤酒产业发展概况[J]. 中外酒业·啤酒科技, 2016(15):6-11.
	China Alcoholic Drinks Association Beer Sub-Committee. General situation of beer industry development in China in 2015[J]. Global Alcinfo, 2016(15):6-11. (in Chinese)
[3]	韩永奇. 推进我国啤酒业智能制造的思考[J]. 酒·饮料技术装备, 2021(3):76-80.
	HAN Y Q. Thinking of promoting the intelligent manufacturing for China beer industry[J]. Brew & Beverage Technology and Equipment, 2021(3):76-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	刘婧怡, 李先德. 我国饲料粮价格的非线性关系研究:以玉米、大麦为例[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2023, 59(10):346-351.
	LIU J Y, LI X D. Study on the non-linear relationship of feed grain price in China:taking corn and barley as examples[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 59(10):346-351. (in Chinese)
[5]	夏建友, 祁刚, 杨友. 饲料产业供给侧结构性改革的有效路径探究[J]. 中国饲料, 2023(10):166-169.
	XIA J Y, QI G, YANG Y. An effective approach to the supply-side structural reform of the feed industry[J]. China Feed, 2023(10):166-169. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	龚谨. 我国大麦进口增长的原因、冲击及贸易政策研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020.
	GONG J. Study on the causes, impacts and trade policies of barley import growth in China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	谭琳元. 大麦进口对中国大麦产业的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020.
	TAN L Y. Study on the influence of barley import on China’s barley industry[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	贾小玲, 孙致陆, 李先德. 中国大麦进口格局及进口多元化分析[J]. 世界农业, 2023(5):57-67.
	JIA X L, SUN Z L, LI X D. Research on China’s barley import pattern and import diversification[J]. World Agriculture, 2023(5):57-67. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	中华人民共和国国家统计局. 国家数据-2022年度数据[EB/OL]. [2023-12-25]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.
[10]	梁长东, 徐大勇, 李荣花. 江苏大麦育种工作的回顾与建议[J]. 大麦科学, 2005, 22(3):1-3.
	LIANG C D, XU D Y, LI R H. Review and suggestion on barley breeding in Jiangsu Province[J]. Barley Science, 2005, 22(3):1-3. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	张京. 大麦种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006:13-19.
[12]	尹小刚. 气候变化背景下东北玉米生产的干旱风险与适应对策[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
	YIN X G. Drought risk and adaptation countermeasures of maize production in Northeast China under the background of climate change[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	ZHANG X Z, LV L J, LV C, et al. Combining ability of different agronomic traits and yield components in hybrid barley[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6):e0126828.
[14]	LI J Z, HUANG X Q, HEINRICHS F, et al. Analysis of QTLs for yield, yield components, and malting quality in a BC3-DH population of spring barley[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 110(2):356-363.
[15]	JAENISCH B R, MUNARO L B, KRISHNA JAGADISH S V, et al. Modulation of wheat yield components in response to management intensification to reduce yield gaps[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13:772232.
[16]	WÜRSCHUM T, LEISER W L, LANGER S M, et al. Phenotypic and genetic analysis of spike and kernel characteristics in wheat reveals long-term genetic trends of grain yield components[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2018, 131(10):2071-2084.
[17]	陈久月, 沈健, 王杨, 等. 小麦新品种(系)产量及其与主要产量性状的相关性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2015, 24(1):49-53.
	CHEN J Y, SHEN J, WANG Y, et al. Correlations between yield and main yield-related traits of new developed wheat varieties(lines)[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2015, 24(1):49-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	淮贺举, 陆洲, 秦向阳, 等. 种植密度对小麦产量和群体质量影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(9):1-4.
	HUAI H J, LU Z, QIN X Y, et al. Advances of researches in plant density effects on the wheat yield and population quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(9):1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	盛也. 盐城市气候变化特征分析及其对农业生产的影响[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2019, 9(6):53-54.
	SHENG Y. Characteristics of climate change in Yancheng City and its impact on agricultural production[J]. Journal of Agricultural Catastrophology, 2019, 9(6):53-54. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	全国食品工业标准化技术委员会酿酒分技术委员会. 中华人民共和国国家标准:GB/T 7416—2008 啤酒大麦[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[21]	ZHANG G P, LI C D. Genetics and improvement of barley malt quality[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2009:261-263.
[22]	赵盟, 王春超, 张仁旭, 等. 中国大麦育成品种产量相关性状鉴定评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(5):1371-1382.
	ZHAO M, WANG C C, ZHANG R X, et al. Evaluation of the yield-related traits of Chinese barley cultivars[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(5):1371-1382. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	曾浙荣, 庞家智, 周桂英, 等. 我国北部冬麦区小麦品种籽粒灌浆特性的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1996, 22(6):720-728.
	ZENG Z R, PANG J Z, ZHOU G Y, et al. Study on grain filling characteristics of wheat varieties in northern winter wheat region of China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1996, 22(6):720-728.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	赵致, 李家修, 张成琦. 贵州高原夏秋麦籽粒灌浆特性的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1998, 24(1):110-117.
	ZHAO Z, LI J X, ZHANG C Q. Studies on some characteristics of grain filling of wheat with late-summer and early-autumn sowing in Guizhou Plateau[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1998, 24(1):110-117. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	米国华, 李文雄. 温光互作对春性小麦小穗建成的效应[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(2):186-192.
	MI G H, LI W X. Effects of photo-thermal interaction on spikelet formation in spring wheats[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1999, 25(2):186-192. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	薛香, 郜庆炉. 光温生态因子对冬小麦幼穗分化的影响研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(4):56-59.
	XUE X, GAO Q L. Effects of daylength and temperature on the spike differentiation of winter wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(4):56-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	朱翠林, 李锐宁, 张保军, 等. 旱肥地密度对大穗型冬小麦品种生育特性及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(1):71-75.
	ZHU C L, LI R N, ZHANG B J, et al. Effect of planting density on growth characters and yield of winter wheat variety of big spike in dryland[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2010, 19(1):71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	王立明. 播种密度对旱地不同类型冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国种业, 2010(3):41-43.
	WANG L M. Effects of planting density on grain yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat with different types[J]. China Seed Industry, 2010(3):41-43. (in Chinese)
[29]	田文仲, 温红霞, 高海涛, 等. 不同播期、播种密度及其互作对小麦产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(2):45-49.
	TIAN W Z, WEN H X, GAO H T, et al. Effects of sowing date, density and their combination on yield of wheat[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 40(2):45-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	温红霞, 冯伟森, 段国辉, 等. 不同播种密度对冬小麦灌浆特性及产量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2009, 21(12):23-25.
	WEN H X, FENG W S, DUAN G H, et al. Effects of different planting densities on grain-filling characteristics and yield of winter wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2009, 21(12):23-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	王婧姝. 小麦与产量相关的农艺性状研究进展[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29(18):23.
	WANG J S. Research progress on agronomic traits related to wheat yield[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2018, 29(18):23. (in Chinese)
[32]	王莹, 杜建林. 大麦根倒伏抗性评价方法及其倒伏系数的通径分析[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(6):941-945.
	WANG Y, DU J L. Evaluation method of root lodging resistance and its path analysis in barley[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(6):941-945. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	SALLAM A, AMRO A, ELAKHDAR A, et al. Marker-trait association for grain weight of spring barley in well-watered and drought environments[J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2019, 46(3):2907-2918.
[34]	ANNICCHIARICO P, PECETTI L. Developing a tall durum wheat plant type for semi-arid, Mediterranean cereal-livestock farming systems[J]. Field Crops Research, 2003, 80(2):157-164.
[35]	JATAYEV S, SUKHIKH I, VAVILOVA V, et al. Green revolution ‘stumbles’ in a dry environment:dwarf wheat with Rht genes fails to produce higher grain yield than taller plants under drought[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2020, 43(10):2355-2364.
[36]	PEARCE S. Towards the replacement of wheat ‘Green Revolution’ genes[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72(2):157-160.
[37]	王晓利. 中国沿海极端气候变化及其对NDVI的影响特征研究[D]. 烟台: 中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所, 2017.
	WANG X L. Study on the characteristics of coastal extreme climate change and its influence on NDVI in China[D]. Yantai: Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	CHENG J Y, HILL C, HAN Y, et al. New semi-dwarfing alleles with increased coleoptile length by gene editing of gibberellin 3-oxidase 1 using CRISPR-Cas9 in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2023, 21(4):806-818.
[39]	YU G T, HORSLEY R D, ZHANG B X, et al. A new semi-dwarfing gene identified by molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci in barley[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010, 120(4):853-861.
[40]	CHONO M, HONDA I, ZENIYA H, et al. A semidwarf phenotype of barley uzu results from a nucleotide substitution in the gene encoding a putative brassinosteroid receptor[J]. Plant Physiology, 2003, 133(3):1209-1219.
[41]	ELLIS R P, FORSTER B P, GORDON D C, et al. Phenotype/genotype associations for yield and salt tolerance in a barley mapping population segregating for two dwarfing genes[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53(371):1163-1176.
[42]	JIA Q J, ZHANG J J, WESTCOTT S, et al. GA-20 oxidase as a candidate for the semidwarf gene sdw1/denso in barley[J]. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 2009, 9(2):255-262.
[43]	MCCLEAR B V, GLENNIE-HOLMES M. Enzymic quantification of (1→3) (1→4)-β-D-glucan in barley and malt[J]. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 1985, 91(5):285-295.
[44]	FOX G P, BETTENHAUSEN H M. Variation in quality of grains used in malting and brewing[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14:1172028.
[45]	SHU X L, RASMUSSEN S K. Quantification of amylose, amylopectin, and β-glucan in search for genes controlling the three major quality traits in barley by genome-wide association studies[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5:197.

2007—2021年江苏沿海地区大麦品比鉴定试验品种(系)的综合性状变化特征

Change characteristics of comprehensive traits of barley varieties (strains) in the comparative identification tests in coastal areas of Jiangsu Province of China from 2007 to 2021

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张元元, 冯举伶, 肖婧凤, 关宇, 龙楚儿, 姚立蓉, 孟亚雄, 司二静, 李葆春, 马小乐, 王化俊, 周喜荣, 刘梅金, 汪军成. 青稞遗传多样性及其农艺性状与SSR标记的关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 1977-1989.
[2]	栾海业, 朱琳洁, 李钰, 孟炜, 刘雨倩, 徐肖, 刘方方, 沈会权. 大麦籽粒相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 997-1002.
[3]	薛贤滨, 贾琼, 陈峥峰, 黎瑞源, 陈庆富, 石桃雄. 基于主成分分析的苦荞麦重组自交系农艺性状综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 748-759.
[4]	张婷, 王雪艳, 郭勤卫, 李朝森, 刘慧琴, 项小敏, 韦静, 赵东风, 万红建. 基于农艺性状的辣椒种质资源遗传多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 325-333.
[5]	李学龙, 李超, 李跃, 刘国丽, 张鹏, 张敏. 不同栽培模式对灵芝菌株农艺性状及活性成分积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2045-2055.
[6]	卜远鹏, 刘娜, 张古文, 冯志娟, 王斌, 龚亚明, 许林英. 菜用大豆种质资源的农艺性状多样性评价及核心种质与食味品质评价体系的构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314.
[7]	檀舒霞, 赵桃弟, 杨豪, 宁可君, 刘丽, 何庆元, 黄守程, 舒英杰. 遮阴对10个菜用大豆品种农艺性状、产量和硝态氮代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 729-735.
[8]	朱丽, 薛新如, 梁宗旭, 许琳玉, 余国峰, 唐懿, 李焕秀. 辣椒种质资源辣椒素含量与农艺性状的相关性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 862-872.
[9]	裴芸, 徐秀红, 陆锦彪, 陈阿敏, 张万萍. 151份贵州地方樱桃番茄资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 310-316.
[10]	莫言玲, 张文静, 罗亚兰, 曾静, 陈静静, 刘义华. 宽柄芥种质资源农艺性状与营养品质性状鉴定与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 317-328.
[11]	汪宝根, 董君暘, 汪颖, 李素娟, 王尖, 鲁忠富, 吴晓花, 李国景, 吴新义. 浙江省地方菜豆种质资源鉴定与遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 2416-2427.
[12]	冯彩军, 宋瑞娇, 宋凌宇, 张松, 齐军仓. 2,4-表芸苔素内酯浸种对干旱胁迫下大麦种子萌发期淀粉代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2112-2120.
[13]	翟秀明, 李解, 唐敏, 胡方洁, 张军, 侯渝嘉, 徐泽. 重庆30份茶树种质资源农艺性状与生化成分多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1244-1255.
[14]	沈迪, 陈龙正, 路晓华, 陶建平, 冯顾城, 刘洁霞, 冯凯, 尹莲, 丁旭, 贾丽丽, 徐志胜, 刘惠吉, 熊爱生. 苏南地区29个秋冬茬芹菜品种资源评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 653-660.
[15]	胡倩文, 徐延浩, 王容, 张文英, 华为, 吕超. 大麦4个穗部性状的关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 1941-1953.