华东覆盆子优势种质资源的筛选与评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240544

浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 349-364.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240544

华东覆盆子优势种质资源的筛选与评价

李灿¹(), 杨婷¹, 孙乙铭¹^,²^,³, 陈洪梁¹^,², 崔琦¹, 沈晓霞¹^,²^,³^,^*()

1.浙江中医药大学药学院,浙江杭州 311402
2.浙江中医药大学松阳研究院有限公司,浙江松阳 323400
3.中药植物精油浙江省工程研究中心,浙江杭州 310053

收稿日期:2024-06-24 出版日期:2025-02-25 发布日期:2025-03-20
作者简介:*沈晓霞,E-mail: shenxiaoxia@zcmu.edu.cn
李灿(1999—),男,浙江湖州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为华东覆盆子种质资源评价和新品种选育。E-mail:601943384@qq.com
通讯作者: 沈晓霞
基金资助:
浙江省中药材新品种选育重大科技专项(2021C02074-1)

Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu

LI Can¹(), YANG Ting¹, SUN Yiming¹^,²^,³, CHEN Hongliang¹^,², CUI Qi¹, SHEN Xiaoxia¹^,²^,³^,^*()

1. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 311402, China
2. Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Songyang Research Institute Co., Ltd., Songyang 323400, Zhejiang, China
3. Zhejiang Engineering Research Centre for Essential Oils of Chinese Medicines and Plants, Hangzhou 310053, China

Received:2024-06-24 Online:2025-02-25 Published:2025-03-20
Contact: SHEN Xiaoxia

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为筛选出适宜新品种选育的华东覆盆子优势种质资源,统计和测定了20份浙江省的华东覆盆子种质资源主要农艺性状和化学成分含量,并进行多样性分析、相关性分析、主成分分析和聚类分析。结果显示,20份华东覆盆子农艺性状和化学成分含量的变异幅度较大,多样性丰富。华东覆盆子农艺性状与化学成分含量间的相关性表明,果梗长、果形与多数化学成分含量间呈显著正相关性;果产量、花径、茎分枝数与少数化学成分含量间呈正相关性;株径、枝径与少数化学成分含量间呈负相关性。基于华东覆盆子的果实产量和化学成分含量主成分分析得分,综合评价筛选出品质优良的2份资源,分别是Y3和Y9。研究结果为华东覆盆子新品种选育和道地药材品质评价提供了参考。

关键词: 华东覆盆子, 种质资源, 农艺性状, 化学成分, 产量

Abstract:

In order to screen out the advantageous germplasm resources suitable for the breeding of new varieties, the main agronomic traits and chemical components contents of 20 germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu in Zhejiang Province were counted and determined. Diversity analysis, correlation analysis, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were carried out. The results revealed significant variability and rich diversity in both agronomic traits and chemical composition contents among the 20 R. chingii samples. Correlation analysis between agronomic traits and chemical composition contents indicated significant positive correlations between traits such as fruit pedicel length, fruit shape, and contents of most chemical components. Positive correlations were also observed between traits like fruit yield, flower diameter, stem branching number, and contents of certain chemical components, while negative correlations were found between traits such as plant diameter, branch diameter, and contents of specific chemical components. Based on the principal component analysis scores for fruit yield and chemical composition contents of R. chingii, two superior germplasm resources, namely Y3 and Y9, were identified. This study provides valuable insights for the breeding of new R. chingii varieties and the evaluation of medicinal quality in authentic medicinal materials.

Key words: Rubus chingii, genetic resource, agronomic trait, chemical content, yield

中图分类号:

S663

李灿, 杨婷, 孙乙铭, 陈洪梁, 崔琦, 沈晓霞. 华东覆盆子优势种质资源的筛选与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 349-364.

LI Can, YANG Ting, SUN Yiming, CHEN Hongliang, CUI Qi, SHEN Xiaoxia. Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 349-364.

图/表 16

参考文献 33

[1]	柯创, 张婷婷, 刘考铧, 等. 覆盆子的基原植物考证[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报, 2021, 45(9): 1026-1032.
	KE C, ZHANG T T, LIU K H, et al. Research on original plants of rubi fructus[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 2021, 45(9): 1026-1032. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:一部[M]. 2020年版. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 399.
[3]	何伯伟, 姜娟萍, 徐丹彬. 道地药材“浙八味” 与新“浙八味”[J]. 新农村, 2020(5): 21-22.
	HE B W, JIANG J P, XU D B. Authentic medicinal materials “Zhe Eight Flavors” and the new “Zhe Eight Flavors”[J]. Xin Nongcun, 2020(5): 21-22. (in Chinese)
[4]	陈奎霖, 黄达荣, 黄少杰, 等. 覆盆子活性成分及其综合利用研究进展[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(9): 219-226.
	CHEN K L, HUANG D R, HUANG S J, et al. Research progress on active components and comprehensive utilization of Rubus chingii Hu[J]. Food & Machinery, 2022, 38(9): 219-226. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	夏轩轩, 李昆, 丁研华, 等. 覆盆子及有效部位对老年大鼠学习记忆能力的影响及机制初探[J]. 中药药理与临床, 2015, 31(3): 110-113.
	XIA X X, LI K, DING Y H, et al. Effects of Raspberry and it’s effective position on learning and memory impairment rats of natural aging[J]. Pharmacology and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica, 2015, 31(3): 110-113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	SHENG J Y, WANG S Q, LIU K H, et al. Rubus chingii Hu: an overview of botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology[J]. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, 2020, 18(6): 401-416.
[7]	SUN N, WANG Y, LIU Y, et al. A new ent-labdane diterpene saponin from the fruits of Rubus chingii[J]. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 2013, 49(1): 49-53.
[8]	TANAKA T, KOHDA H, TANAKA O, et al. Rubusoside (Β-d-glucosyl ester of 13-O-β-d-glucosyl-steviol), a sweet principle of Rubus Chingii Hu (rosaceae)[J]. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1981, 45(9): 2165-2166.
[9]	季宇彬, 包晓威, 单宇, 等. 覆盆子提取物对ConA致小鼠急性肝损伤的保护作用研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2019, 44(4): 774-780.
	JI Y B, BAO X W, SHAN Y, et al. Protective effect of raspberry extract on ConA-induced acute liver injury in mice[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2019, 44(4): 774-780. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	ZENG H J, LIU Z, WANG Y P, et al. Studies on the anti-aging activity of a glycoprotein isolated from Fupenzi (Rubus chingii Hu.) and its regulation on klotho gene expression in mice kidney[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 119: 470-476.
[11]	HE B H, DAI L H, JIN L, et al. Bioactive components, pharmacological effects, and drug development of traditional herbal medicine Rubus chingii Hu (Fu-Pen-Zi)[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2023, 9: 1052504.
[12]	KE H H, BAO T, CHEN W. Polysaccharide from Rubus chingii Hu affords protection against palmitic acid-induced lipotoxicity in human hepatocytes[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 133: 1063-1071.
[13]	LIANG W Q, XU G J, WENG D, et al. Anti-osteoporotic components of Rubus chingii[J]. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 2015, 51(1): 47-49.
[14]	陈亦权, 陈珍, 江景勇, 等. 掌叶覆盆子种内与种间遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(21): 183-188.
	CHEN Y Q, CHEN Z, JIANG J Y, et al. RAPD analysis of intra-and inter-specific genetic diversity in Rubus chingii Hu palmatus[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 61(21): 183-188. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	WILLMAN M R, BUSHAKRA J M, BASSIL N, et al. Analysis of a multi-environment trial for black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.) quality traits[J]. Genes, 2022, 13(3): 418.
[16]	GUAN L, ZHAO M Z, QIAN Y M, et al. Phenotypic analysis combined with tandem mass tags (TMT) labeling reveal the heterogeneity of strawberry stolon buds[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1): 505.
[17]	孙健, 任江剑, 华金渭, 等. 华东地区掌叶覆盆子的表型特征和基于ISSR标记的遗传分析[J]. 中国现代中药, 2021, 23(3): 426-431.
	SUN J, REN J J, HUA J W, et al. Phenotype characteristics and genetic analysis based on ISSR makers of Rubus chingii in East China[J]. Modern Chinese Medicine, 2021, 23(3): 426-431. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	刘云鹤, 王晓林, 钟方丽. 三氯化铝显色法测定刺玫叶提取物总黄酮的含量[J]. 特产研究, 2017, 39(2): 50-53.
	LIU Y H, WANG X L, ZHONG F L. Content determination of total flavonoids in extracts of Rosa davurica Pall. leaves with aluminium trichloride chromogenic method[J]. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research, 2017, 39(2): 50-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	朱仙慕, 陈丹, 马国萍, 等. 叶下珠薄层色谱鉴别及福林酚法测定总多酚含量研究[J]. 中国中医药科技, 2018, 25(4): 514-519.
	ZHU X M, CHEN D, MA G P, et al. Study on thin layer chromatographic identification and determination of total polyphenols by folin ciocalteu method of Yexiazhu(Phyllanthus urinaria L)[J]. Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Science and Technology, 2018, 25(4): 514-519. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	吕亭亭, 杨志华, 韩永红, 等. 响应面法优化苯酚-硫酸法测定泡桐花多糖含量[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2020, 37(7): 62-68.
	LV T T, YANG Z H, HAN Y H, et al. Optimization in phenol-sulfuric acid method for determination of content of paulowniae flos polysaccharide by response surface methodology[J]. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2020, 37(7): 62-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	孙乙铭, 许寿增, 俞春英, 等. 覆盆子成熟过程颜色表征及其与品质指标消长的相关性研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2021, 46(6): 1379-1385.
	SUN Y M, XU S Z, YU C Y, et al. Color characterization and its correlation with quality index during ripening of Rubus chingii[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2021, 46(6): 1379-1385. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	于沐, 杨海棠, 胡延岭, 等. 河南省316份花生资源抗叶斑病的抗性评价分析[J]. 种子, 2024, 43(6): 86-90.
	YU M, YANG H T, HU Y L, et al. Evaluation and analysis of resistance to leaf spot of 316 peanut resources in Henan Province[J]. Seed, 2024, 43(6): 86-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	李宁. 常规育种技术在园林植物资源开发中的应用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(10): 3405-3410.
	LI N. The application of conventional breeding techniques in the development of garden plant resources[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2024, 22(10): 3405-3410. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	张武君, 陈菁瑛, 刘保财, 等. 37份福建山药地方品种主要性状遗传变异研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(11): 1246-1254.
	ZHANG W J, CHEN J Y, LIU B C, et al. Genetic variations on major traits of 37 Chinese yam germplasms[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(11): 1246-1254. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	CUI H L, CHEN C R, HUANG N Z, et al. Association analysis of yield, oil and fatty acid content, and main phenotypic traits in Paeonia rockii as an oil crop[J]. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2018, 93(4): 425-432.
[26]	李华锋, 滕杰, 杨家干, 等. 连南栽培型古茶树资源叶片表型性状遗传多样性及聚类分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(36): 109-114.
	LI H F, TENG J, YANG J G, et al. Genetic diversity and cluster analysis of leaf phenotypic traits of Liannan cultivated ancient tea[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(36): 109-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	张翠琴, 姬志峰, 林丽丽, 等. 五角枫种群表型多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(16): 5343-5352.
	ZHANG C Q, JI Z F, LIN L L, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Acer mono maxim population[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(16): 5343-5352. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	张怀山, 夏曾润, 代立兰, 等. 中型狼尾草种质资源表型性状的多样性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(12): 51-59.
	ZHANG H S, XIA Z R, DAI L L, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Pennisetum longissimum var. intermedium germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2014, 23(12): 51-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	朱丽, 薛新如, 梁宗旭, 等. 辣椒种质资源辣椒素含量与农艺性状的相关性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 862-872.
	ZHU L, XUE X R, LIANG Z X, et al. Correlation between capsaicin content and agronomic traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 862-872. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	冯链, 田翔, 乔治军, 等. 谷子农艺性状与蛋白质含量相关性分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(6): 43-53.
	FENG L, TIAN X, QIAO Z J, et al. Correlation analysis between protein content and agronomic traits of foxtail millet[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(6): 43-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	吴林, 张强, 王颖, 等. 中国树莓科学研究和产业发展的回顾与展望[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2021, 43(3): 265-274.
	WU L, ZHANG Q, WANG Y, et al. Review and prospect of scientific research and industrial development of raspberry in China[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2021, 43(3): 265-274. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	CHEN Z, JIANG J Y, SHU L Z, et al. Combined transcriptomic and metabolic analyses reveal potential mechanism for fruit development and quality control of Chinese raspberry (Rubus chingii Hu)[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2021, 40(10): 1923-1946.
[33]	LI X B, SUN J, CHEN Z, et al. Metabolite profile and genes/proteins expression in β-citraturin biosynthesis during fruit ripening in Chinese raspberry (Rubus chingii Hu)[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 163: 76-86.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

156

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	6	0	0	150

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	140	16
比例	90%	10%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	51

	来源	本网站

	次数	51
	比例	100%

种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source	种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source
Y1	丽水碧湖镇 Bihu Town, Lishui	Y11	丽水庆元 Qingyuan, Lishui
Y2	丽水大港头镇 Dagangtou Town, Lishui	Y12	金华兰溪 Lanxi, Jinhua
Y3	丽水老竹 Laozhu, Lishui	Y13	金华浦江 Pujiang, Jinhua
Y4	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y14	宁波宁海 Ninghai, Ningbo
Y5	丽水太平乡 Taiping Township, Lishui	Y15	杭州桐庐 Tonglu, Hangzhou
Y6	丽水松阳 Songyang, Lishui	Y16	杭州临岐 Linqi, Hangzhou
Y7	丽水丽新 Lixin, Lishui	Y17	台州天台 Tiantai, Taizhou
Y8	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou	Y18	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou
Y9	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y19	金华磐安 Pan’an, Jinhua
Y10	丽水云和 Yunhe, Lishui	Y20	温州乐清 Yueqing, Wenzhou

种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source	种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source
Y1	丽水碧湖镇 Bihu Town, Lishui	Y11	丽水庆元 Qingyuan, Lishui
Y2	丽水大港头镇 Dagangtou Town, Lishui	Y12	金华兰溪 Lanxi, Jinhua
Y3	丽水老竹 Laozhu, Lishui	Y13	金华浦江 Pujiang, Jinhua
Y4	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y14	宁波宁海 Ninghai, Ningbo
Y5	丽水太平乡 Taiping Township, Lishui	Y15	杭州桐庐 Tonglu, Hangzhou
Y6	丽水松阳 Songyang, Lishui	Y16	杭州临岐 Linqi, Hangzhou
Y7	丽水丽新 Lixin, Lishui	Y17	台州天台 Tiantai, Taizhou
Y8	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou	Y18	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou
Y9	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y19	金华磐安 Pan’an, Jinhua
Y10	丽水云和 Yunhe, Lishui	Y20	温州乐清 Yueqing, Wenzhou

种质资源 Germplasm resource	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
Y1	2.45 ±0.19	密集 Dense	7	0.99 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.2	4.7 ±0.3	7.2 ±0.5	6±1	3.1 ±0.1	渐尖 Taper	1.04 ±0.33	193 ±16
Y2	2.42 ±0.18	中等 Middling	5	1.10 ±0.07	4.7 ±0.2	4.0 ±0.3	5.9 ±1.8	7±1	2.7 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.73 ±0.16	140 ±22
Y3	2.34 ±0.34	密集 Dense	7	1.07 ±0.09	6.2 ±0.3	4.7 ±0.4	5.0 ±1.0	7±2	4.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.63 ±0.20	184 ±25
Y4	2.38 ±0.28	中等 Middling	5	1.14 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.0 ±1.0	6±2	2.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	1.17 ±0.25	147 ±31
Y5	2.70 ±0.48	中等 Middling	7	1.19 ±0.14	5.5 ±0.2	5.0 ±0.4	6.0 ±1.0	8±2	3.0 ±0.2	截平 Truncation	1.28 ±0.28	220 ±11
Y6	2.71 ±0.20	中等 Middling	5	1.30 ±0.12	4.5 ±0.1	5.6 ±0.8	6.4 ±0.8	6±1	2.9 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.47 ±0.10	98 ±14
Y7	3.20 ±0.11	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.25 ±0.08	4.6 ±0.2	5.1 ±0.8	4.5 ±0.5	10±2	/	/	/	/
Y8	2.77 ±0.33	密集 Dense	7	1.17 ±0.13	5.0 ±0.3	5.4 ±0.5	6.2 ±0.6	7±1	3.6 ±0.1	截平 Truncation	1.50 ±0.29	198 ±28
Y9	2.31 ±0.53	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.01 ±0.09	4.7 ±0.6	4.7 ±0.6	5.4 ±0.6	8±2	2.9 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.95 ±0.14	199 ±34
Y10	2.53 ±0.48	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.13 ±0.16	4.4 ±0.3	5.8 ±0.5	6.7 ±0.9	6±1	4.0 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	1.12 ±0.28	94 ±18
Y11	1.90 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	0.85 ±0.10	5.0 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.3 ±1.3	12±3	3.7 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.44 ±0.16	46 ±11
Y12	2.56 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	1.13 ±0.14	4.6 ±0.2	4.6 ±0.3	6.7 ±1.3	8±2	3.6 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	0.70 ±0.28	57 ±15
Y13	3.18 ±0.59	密集 Dense	7	1.08 ±0.12	5.2 ±0.3	5.3 ±0.6	5.5 ±1.1	10±4	3.3 ±0.3	渐尖 Taper	1.31 ±0.33	67 ±22
Y14	3.16 ±0.15	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.19 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	5.2 ±0.3	5.7 ±1.1	9±2	3.5 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.80 ±0.26	96 ±15
Y15	2.21 ±0.33	中等 Middling	7	0.84 ±0.15	4.5 ±0.3	4.4 ±0.5	5.5 ±0.7	11±1	2.3 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.56 ±0.09	80 ±16
Y16	2.86 ±0.46	密集 Dense	7	1.09 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	3.8 ±0.2	4.9 ±0.8	12±4	3.0 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.62 ±0.19	134 ±26
Y17	2.86 ±0.71	密集 Dense	5	1.08 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.8 ±0.6	4.9 ±0.6	9±2	2.2 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.67 ±0.23	108 ±19
Y18	2.43 ±0.39	中等 Middling	5	0.96 ±0.08	4.9 ±0.3	4.0 ±0.1	5.3 ±0.4	8±2	2.5 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.64 ±0.15	137 ±26
Y19	2.65 ±0.29	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.03 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.1	4.8 ±0.6	6.8 ±1.2	9±2	3.1 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.12	133 ±21
Y20	1.80 ±0.25	中等 Middling	7	0.85 ±0.14	4.0 ±0.3	5.0 ±0.3	4.8 ±0.8	14±3	1.6 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.15	147 ±17

种质资源 Germplasm resource	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
Y1	2.45 ±0.19	密集 Dense	7	0.99 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.2	4.7 ±0.3	7.2 ±0.5	6±1	3.1 ±0.1	渐尖 Taper	1.04 ±0.33	193 ±16
Y2	2.42 ±0.18	中等 Middling	5	1.10 ±0.07	4.7 ±0.2	4.0 ±0.3	5.9 ±1.8	7±1	2.7 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.73 ±0.16	140 ±22
Y3	2.34 ±0.34	密集 Dense	7	1.07 ±0.09	6.2 ±0.3	4.7 ±0.4	5.0 ±1.0	7±2	4.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.63 ±0.20	184 ±25
Y4	2.38 ±0.28	中等 Middling	5	1.14 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.0 ±1.0	6±2	2.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	1.17 ±0.25	147 ±31
Y5	2.70 ±0.48	中等 Middling	7	1.19 ±0.14	5.5 ±0.2	5.0 ±0.4	6.0 ±1.0	8±2	3.0 ±0.2	截平 Truncation	1.28 ±0.28	220 ±11
Y6	2.71 ±0.20	中等 Middling	5	1.30 ±0.12	4.5 ±0.1	5.6 ±0.8	6.4 ±0.8	6±1	2.9 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.47 ±0.10	98 ±14
Y7	3.20 ±0.11	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.25 ±0.08	4.6 ±0.2	5.1 ±0.8	4.5 ±0.5	10±2	/	/	/	/
Y8	2.77 ±0.33	密集 Dense	7	1.17 ±0.13	5.0 ±0.3	5.4 ±0.5	6.2 ±0.6	7±1	3.6 ±0.1	截平 Truncation	1.50 ±0.29	198 ±28
Y9	2.31 ±0.53	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.01 ±0.09	4.7 ±0.6	4.7 ±0.6	5.4 ±0.6	8±2	2.9 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.95 ±0.14	199 ±34
Y10	2.53 ±0.48	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.13 ±0.16	4.4 ±0.3	5.8 ±0.5	6.7 ±0.9	6±1	4.0 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	1.12 ±0.28	94 ±18
Y11	1.90 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	0.85 ±0.10	5.0 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.3 ±1.3	12±3	3.7 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.44 ±0.16	46 ±11
Y12	2.56 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	1.13 ±0.14	4.6 ±0.2	4.6 ±0.3	6.7 ±1.3	8±2	3.6 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	0.70 ±0.28	57 ±15
Y13	3.18 ±0.59	密集 Dense	7	1.08 ±0.12	5.2 ±0.3	5.3 ±0.6	5.5 ±1.1	10±4	3.3 ±0.3	渐尖 Taper	1.31 ±0.33	67 ±22
Y14	3.16 ±0.15	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.19 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	5.2 ±0.3	5.7 ±1.1	9±2	3.5 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.80 ±0.26	96 ±15
Y15	2.21 ±0.33	中等 Middling	7	0.84 ±0.15	4.5 ±0.3	4.4 ±0.5	5.5 ±0.7	11±1	2.3 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.56 ±0.09	80 ±16
Y16	2.86 ±0.46	密集 Dense	7	1.09 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	3.8 ±0.2	4.9 ±0.8	12±4	3.0 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.62 ±0.19	134 ±26
Y17	2.86 ±0.71	密集 Dense	5	1.08 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.8 ±0.6	4.9 ±0.6	9±2	2.2 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.67 ±0.23	108 ±19
Y18	2.43 ±0.39	中等 Middling	5	0.96 ±0.08	4.9 ±0.3	4.0 ±0.1	5.3 ±0.4	8±2	2.5 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.64 ±0.15	137 ±26
Y19	2.65 ±0.29	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.03 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.1	4.8 ±0.6	6.8 ±1.2	9±2	3.1 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.12	133 ±21
Y20	1.80 ±0.25	中等 Middling	7	0.85 ±0.14	4.0 ±0.3	5.0 ±0.3	4.8 ±0.8	14±3	1.6 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.15	147 ±17

参数Parameter	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
最小值Minimum	1.80	0	5.00	0.84	4.35	3.80	4.55	5.00	1.57	1.00	0.44	0
最大值Maximum	3.20	30.00	7.00	1.30	6.18	5.77	7.16	12.00	4.28	3.00	1.50	220.40
平均值Average value	2.57	20.82	6.00	1.07	4.87	4.78	5.64	8.35	3.03	2.11	0.83	121.15
标准差Standard deviation	0.37	7.80	1.00	0.13	0.47	0.51	0.73	2.08	0.66	0.55	0.30	54.88
变异系数CV/%	14.41	37.44	16.67	11.64	9.68	10.60	12.92	24.86	21.92	26.22	36.60	45.30

华东覆盆子优势种质资源的筛选与评价

Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

性状Trait	SD	ND	NLL	BD	FD	BP	PS	SBN	FSL	FS	SFW
ND	-0.143
NLL	-0.230	0.083
BD	0.732^**	-0.289	-0.116
FD	-0.067	0.129	0.224	0.197
BP	0.334	-0.339	0.334	0.456^*	0.311
PS	-0.020	-0.123	-0.088	0.110	0.194	0.286
SBN	-0.139	0.183	-0.008	-0.531^*	-0.401	-0.247	-0.527^*
FSL	-0.095	0.144	-0.050	-0.014	0.670^**	0.135	0.529^*	-0.290
FS	-0.217	0.221	-0.283	-0.297	0.258	-0.032	0.458^*	-0.150	0.569^**
SFW	0.100	0.100	0.090	0.133	0.339	0.271	0.348	-0.368	0.493^*	0.282
FY	-0.220	0.028	0.221	-0.046	-0.033	-0.110	0.221	-0.349	0.239	-0.008	0.626^**

性状 Trait	主成分Principal component
性状 Trait	1	2	3	4	5
SD	0.109	-0.764	-0.279	-0.047	0.413
ND	-0.045	0.532	-0.003	0.200	0.681
NLL	0.070	0.027	0.840	0.401	-0.101
BD	0.352	-0.845	-0.089	-0.052	0.243
FD	0.654	0.084	0.041	0.592	0.152
BP	0.459	-0.539	0.185	0.400	-0.263
PS	0.709	0.082	-0.226	-0.183	-0.395
SBN	-0.720	0.264	-0.036	0.241	0.063
FSL	0.770	0.368	-0.192	0.194	0.065
FS	0.463	0.549	-0.516	0.066	-0.113
SFW	0.729	0.119	0.254	-0.254	0.289
FY	0.410	0.250	0.555	-0.629	0.108
特征值Eigenvalue	3.310	2.468	1.556	1.309	1.069
贡献率	27.58	20.57	12.96	10.91	8.91
Contribution rate/%
累积贡献率	27.58	48.15	61.11	72.02	80.93
Cumulative contribution rate/%

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	总多酚含量 Total polyphenols content	总黄酮含量 Total flavone content	总多糖含量 Total polysaccharides content	鞣花酸含量 Ellagic acid content	椴树苷含量 Tiliroside content	山柰酚-3-O-芸香糖苷含量 Kaempferol- 3-O-rutinoside content
Y1	8.41±0.08	1.09±0.02	3.16±0.03	0.393±0.001	0.056±0.001	0.061±0.001
Y2	10.36±0.05	1.57±0.03	3.48±0.03	0.508±0.001	0.046±0.001	0.037±0.001
Y3	9.81±0.04	2.06±0.04	4.12±0.02	0.516±0.002	0.030±0.001	0.058±0.001
Y4	7.80±0.10	1.38±0.01	2.68±0.01	0.395±0.001	0.026±0.001	0.033±0.001
Y5	9.31±0.04	1.37±0.02	2.79±0.03	0.341±0.001	0.036±0.001	0.040±0.001
Y6	10.57±0.11	1.81±0.01	4.31±0.01	0.424±0.001	0.029±0.001	0.046±0.001
Y7	/	/	/	/	/	/
Y8	7.15±0.16	0.94±0.01	2.50±0.02	0.259±0.001	0.031±0.001	0.035±0.001
Y9	10.06±0.16	1.43±0.04	3.24±0.04	0.509±0.002	0.030±0.001	0.075±0.001
Y10	10.23±0.06	2.48±0.02	3.70±0.04	0.725±0.001	0.032±0.001	0.057±0.001
Y11	7.37±0.09	1.21±0.03	2.28±0.02	0.284±0.001	0.043±0.001	0.045±0.001
Y12	8.51±0.07	1.85±0.01	2.81±0.12	0.424±0.002	0.056±0.001	0.060±0.001
Y13	8.02±0.01	1.58±0.02	2.41±0.05	0.533±0.001	0.044±0.001	0.091±0.001
Y14	8.78±0.07	1.14±0.04	2.50±0.03	0.341±0.001	0.036±0.001	0.067±0.001
Y15	8.66±0.03	1.57±0.02	2.96±0.02	0.501±0.001	0.039±0.001	0.078±0.001
Y16	12.01±0.06	1.66±0.01	3.36±0.04	0.491±0.002	0.052±0.001	0.099±0.001
Y17	8.38±0.09	1.14±0.01	3.53±0.03	0.446±0.001	0.036±0.001	0.097±0.001
Y18	9.55±0.14	1.22±0.05	3.35±0.06	0.501±0.004	0.043±0.002	0.080±0.002
Y19	9.79±0.14	1.95±0.01	3.76±0.01	0.499±0.001	0.020±0.001	0.069±0.001
Y20	8.89±0.10	1.31±0.02	3.06±0.09	0.341±0.001	0.080±0.001	0.114±0.002
平均值Average value	9.14	1.51	3.11	0.444	0.040	0.065
标准差Standard deviation	1.19	0.38	0.57	0.11	0.01	0.02
变异系数CV	13.02	25.02	18.31	23.67	33.68	35.14

主成分 Principal component	总多酚含量 Total polyphenols content	总黄酮含量 Total flavone content	总多糖含量 Total polysaccharides content	鞣花酸含量 Ellagic acid content	椴树苷含量 Tiliroside content	山柰酚-3-O-芸香糖苷含量 Kaempferol-3-O- rutinoside content	特征值 Eigenvalue	贡献率 Contribution rate/%	累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/%
PC1	0.875	0.861	0.842	0.824	0.076	-0.286	2.982	49.70	49.70
PC2	-0.090	-0.059	0.117	0.238	0.896	0.815	1.550	25.82	75.52

种质资源 Germplasm resource	F1	F2	F	排序 Ranking
Y1	-0.94	0.69	-0.29	13
Y2	1.39	-0.40	0.59	5
Y3	2.16	-0.57	0.93	3
Y4	-1.11	-1.67	-0.98	17
Y5	-0.67	-1.16	-0.64	15
Y6	1.99	-1.07	0.72	4
Y7	/	/	/	/
Y8	-2.69	-1.56	-1.74	19
Y9	0.58	-0.19	0.24	9
Y10	3.46	-0.24	1.66	1
Y11	-2.36	-0.70	-1.35	18
Y12	-0.07	0.58	0.12	10
Y13	-0.74	1.02	-0.10	12
Y14	-1.61	-0.38	-0.90	16
Y15	-0.09	0.37	0.05	11
Y16	1.59	1.48	1.17	2
Y17	-1.50	0.63	-0.58	14
Y18	0.15	0.72	0.26	8
Y19	1.53	-0.85	0.54	6
Y20	-1.07	3.27	0.31	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	病害数 Number of disease	害虫侵害数 Infestation number
Y1	1	1
Y2	0	0
Y3	0	0
Y4	0	2
Y5	0	0
Y6	0	1
Y7	1	0
Y8	0	2
Y9	0	1
Y10	1	1
Y11	0	0
Y12	0	2
Y13	1	3
Y14	0	1
Y15	1	0
Y16	1	2
Y17	0	1
Y18	1	2
Y19	0	1
Y20	1	1
总感染率/病害率	4.00	10.50
Overall infection/ disease rate/%

种质资源 Germplasm resource	萌芽期 Stages in germination (month-day)		生长期 Growing stage (month-day)		花期 Flowering stage (month-day)		幼果期 Young fruit stage (month-day)		熟果期 Ripe fruit stage (month-day)
种质资源 Germplasm resource	始芽 Early bud	盛芽 Full bud	始叶 Early leaves	盛叶 Full leaves	始花 Early bloom	盛花 Full bloom	始果 Early productiv	盛果 Full productive	始果 Early productive	盛果 Full productive
Y3	02-09	02-21	03-08	03-20	03-19	04-01	04-08	04-22	04-28	05-11
Y3母株	02-07	02-18	03-05	03-15	03-17	03-27	04-05	04-20	04-25	05-09
Y3 stock plant
Y9	02-05	02-16	03-02	03-13	03-15	03-25	04-07	04-19	04-23	05-07
Y9母株	02-05	02-18	03-04	03-12	03-18	03-25	04-08	04-21	04-26	05-05
Y9 stock plant

种质资源 Germplasm resources	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
Y3	2.34	密集 Dense	7	1.07	6.2	4.7	5	7	4.3	近球 Subglobose	0.63	184
Y3母株 Y3 stock plant	2.29	密集 Dense	7	1.11	5.9	4.8	5.2	8	4.1	近球 Subglobose	0.65	170
Y9	2.31	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.01	4.7	4.7	5.4	8	2.9	近球 Subglobose	0.95	199
Y9母株 Y9 stock plant	2.37	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.08	4.9	4.5	5.1	9	3	近球 Subglobose	0.99	210

[1]	万绍媛, 刘现波, 才硕, 时红, 程婕. 灌溉方式和种植方式对双季稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 257-268.
[2]	李建强, 魏倩倩, 刘晓霞, 张均华, 朱春权. 优化施肥措施对水稻产量和土壤养分平衡的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 438-446.
[3]	韩笑, 刘旭杰, 石吕, 张晋, 单海勇, 石晓旭, 严旖旎, 刘建, 薛亚光. 麦秸行间集覆还田下控释氮肥减施对水稻产量、品质与氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 1-13.
[4]	李腾飞, 杨桂玲, 阮美颖, 褚田芬, 秦华, 邓美华. 不同肥药管理对设施番茄生产系统土壤健康与番茄性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 145-158.
[5]	张元元, 冯举伶, 肖婧凤, 关宇, 龙楚儿, 姚立蓉, 孟亚雄, 司二静, 李葆春, 马小乐, 王化俊, 周喜荣, 刘梅金, 汪军成. 青稞遗传多样性及其农艺性状与SSR标记的关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 1977-1989.
[6]	陈宇眺, 闫川, 洪晓富, 宋佳谕. 分蘖期淹水对常规粳稻生长特性、产量形成与钾素吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 1990-1999.
[7]	闵江艳, 唐卓磊, 杨雪, 黄小燕, 黄凯丰, 何佩云. 不同干旱-复水模式对苦荞生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2000-2009.
[8]	李清超, 杨珊, 张登峰, 刘建新, 孙开利, 吴迅. 四百八十七份玉米地方种质资源穗部性状的表型多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1481-1491.
[9]	潘志军, 吴小文, 吴晨阳, 程驭, 陈龙, 张晓红, 张进山, 周兵, 江波, 张文静, 车钊, 宋贺. 皖中不同类型再生稻品种产量与温光资源利用特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1492-1501.
[10]	汪宝根, 陈小央, 吴健, 李潇, 汪颖, 王尖, 吴晓花, 鲁忠富, 孙玉燕, 董文其, 李国景, 吴新义. 浙江豇豆地方品种的遗传多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1569-1582.
[11]	朱艳宇, 于文涛, 高水练, 吕水源, 王攀, 靳宛旻, 贵文静, 林浥, 叶乃兴. 福建安溪茶树种质资源遗传多样性与铁观音衍生品种遗传关系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1591-1601.
[12]	李慧, 谭晓琴, 唐茜, 杨洋, 陈玮. 疏花对紫嫣茶树产量及品质成分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1602-1615.
[13]	韩清宇, 程林润, 李月红, 仇智灵, 后猛, 楼兵干. 六十份甘薯种质资源对基腐病的抗性评价与抗病相关指标分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1616-1625.
[14]	胡铁军. 化肥减量配施微生物肥对西蓝花产量品质与土壤性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1657-1665.
[15]	许立婷, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 银敏华, 马彦麟, 贾琼, 汪精海, 姜渊博. 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量品质效应的荟萃分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1256-1269.

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7