不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240456

浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1309-1318.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240456

不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响

林小兵¹^,²(), 黎江³, 成艳红¹^,^*(), 王斌强¹, 何绍浪¹^,², 黄尚书¹, 黄欠如¹

1.江西省红壤及种质资源研究所耕地改良与质量提升江西省重点实验室,国家红壤改良工程研究中心,农业农村部江西耕地保育科学观测试验站,江西南昌 331717
2.江西农业大学国土资源与环境学院,江西南昌 330045
3.南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,江苏南京 210095

收稿日期:2024-05-23 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-07-08
作者简介:林小兵(1992—),男,江西丰城人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事土壤资源与环境生态研究。E-mail:linxiaobing14@mails.ucas.ac.cn
通讯作者: *成艳红,E-mail:yanhongch007@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(42267055);江西省现代农业产业技术体系建设项目(JXARS-16)

Effects of organic materials on soil microbial biomass, mineral nitrogen content and rice yield

LIN Xiaobing¹^,²(), LI Jiang³, CHENG Yanhong¹^,^*(), WANG Binqiang¹, HE Shaolang¹^,², HUANG Shangshu¹, HUANG Qianru¹

1. Key Laboratory of Arable Land Improvement and Quality Improvement of Jiangxi Province, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Red Soil Improvement, Jiangxi Province Scientific Observation and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jiangxi Institute of Red Soil and Germplasm Resources, Nanchang 331717, China
2. College of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
3. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received:2024-05-23 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用田间小区试验,以常规化肥为对照(CK),研究了减肥条件下配施不同有机物料[葛渣堆肥(PC)、葛渣生物质炭堆肥(PBCC)、葛渣蚯蚓堆肥(PVCC)、秸秆生物质炭(BC)、牛粪蚯蚓堆肥(VC)]对晚稻不同生育期土壤溶解有机碳(DOC)、硝态氮( $NO 3 -$ -N)、铵态氮( $NH 4 +$ -N)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)、微生物生物量氮(MBN)含量和还原性物质总量、水稻产量的影响。结果表明:在晚稻成熟期,与CK相比,施用有机物料各处理的土壤MBC含量显著(P<0.05)增加89.37%~161.84%,BC处理的土壤MBN含量显著增加108.36%,BC、PC、PVCC处理的土壤 $NO 3 -$ -N含量显著增加51.16%~103.88%,VC、BC处理的土壤 $NH 4 +$ -N含量分别显著增加44.39%、37.07%,VC、PVCC处理的土壤DOC含量分别显著增加59.70%、50.99%。各处理相比,水稻产量并无显著差异。综上,在减肥条件下配施适宜的有机物料可以提高土壤肥力,减少化肥用量,且不引起水稻减产,该试验条件下,以PVCC处理的效果相对更好。

关键词: 有机物料, 蚯蚓堆肥, 矿质氮, 水稻, 产量

Abstract:

In the present study, a field plot experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of application of organic materials[Radix puerariae residues compost (PC), compost of Radix puerariae residues and biochar (PBCC), vermicompost of Radix puerariae residues (PVCC), straw biochar (BC) and vermicompost of cow dung (VC)] with reduced amount of chemical fertilizer on content of soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrate nitrogen ( $NO 3 -$ -N), ammonium nitrogen ( $NH 4 +$ -N), total reducing substances, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and rice yiel, with the common fertilization as control (CK). It was shown that at the maturity stage, all the treatments with application of organic materials significantly (P<0.05) increased soil MBC content by 89.37%-161.84% than that of CK. Beseides, compared with the CK, BC treatment significantly increased soil MBN content by 108.36%; BC, PC, PVCC treatments significantly increased soil $NO 3 -$ -N content by 51.16%-103.88%; VC and BC treatments significantly increased soil $NH 4 +$ -N content by 44.39%, 37.07%, respectively; VC and PVCC treatments significantly increased soil DOC content by 59.70% and 50.99%, respectively. There was no difference in rice yield among treatments. In general, application of proper organic material with reduced amount of chemical fertilizer could improve soil fertility, decrease the input of chemical fertilizers without any adverse effect on rice yield. Under this experiment condition, PVCC treatment showed the best performance.

Key words: organic materials, vermicomposting, mineral nitrogen, rice, yield

中图分类号:

S141
S147

林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318.

LIN Xiaobing, LI Jiang, CHENG Yanhong, WANG Binqiang, HE Shaolang, HUANG Shangshu, HUANG Qianru. Effects of organic materials on soil microbial biomass, mineral nitrogen content and rice yield[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318.

图/表 8

表1 各有机物料的基本性状

Table 1 Basic properties of different organic materials

有机物料 Organic materials	pH值 pH value	有机质含量 Organic matter content/(g·kg^-1)	全氮含量 Total nitrogen content/%	全磷含量 Total phosphorus content/%	全钾含量 Total potassium content/%
秸秆生物质炭Straw biochar	9.27	603.4	0.51	0.70	1.70
牛粪蚯蚓堆肥Vermicompost of cow dung	8.04	380.2	0.90	0.60	0.81
葛渣堆肥Radix puerariae residues compost	8.53	494.0	2.41	0.43	0.77
葛渣生物质炭堆肥	9.40	504.6	1.63	0.50	0.93
Compost of Radix puerariae residues and biochar
葛渣蚯蚓堆肥Vermicompost of Radix puerariae residues	8.97	382.5	0.95	0.50	0.80

表2 各处理的肥料运筹

Table 2 Fertilizer management of treatments kg·hm-2

处理 Treatment	基肥种类及其施用量 Application rate of basal fertilizers				追肥种类及其施用量 Application rate of topdressing
处理 Treatment	有机物料 Organic materials	尿素 Urea	钙镁磷肥 Calcium magnesium phosphate	氯化钾 Potassium chloride	尿素 Urea
CK	0	212.50	718.75	200.00	140.62
BC	3 000	192.33	335.28	97.59	128.22
VC	3 000	177.30	390.24	151.20	118.20
PC	3 000	119.11	483.67	153.61	79.41
PBCC	3 000	149.16	445.20	143.98	99.44
PVCC	3 000	175.38	445.20	151.81	116.92

图1 不同处理对土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)、微生物生物量氮(MBN)含量的影响柱上无相同字母的表示同一生育期不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。

Fig.1 Effects of treatments on content of soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference within treatments at P<0.05 at the same growth stage. The same as below.

图2 不同处理对土壤硝态氮(NO 3 --N)、铵态氮(NH 4 +-N)含量的影响

Fig.2 Effects of treatments on content of soil nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 --N) and ammonium nitrogen (NH 4 +-N)

图3 不同处理对土壤溶解有机碳的影响

Fig.3 Effects of treatments on content of soil dissolved organic carbon

图4 不同处理对土壤还原性物质总量的影响

Fig.4 Effects of treatments on content of soil total reducing substances

图5 不同处理对水稻籽粒产量的影响

Fig.5 Effects of treatments on rice grain yield

图6 部分土壤理化指标与水稻产量的相关性 NO 3 --N,土壤硝态氮含量;NH 4 +-N,土壤铵态氮含量;MBC,土壤微生物生物量碳含量;MBN,土壤微生物生物量氮含量;DOC,土壤溶解有机碳含量;TRS,土壤还原性物质总量;Y,水稻产量。标“*”“**”和“***”的分别表示在P<0.05、P<0.01和P<0.001水平上显著相关。

Fig.6 Correlation of soil physiochemical indexes and rice yield NO 3 --N, Soil nitrate nitrogen content; NH 4 +-N, Soil ammonium nitrogen content; MBC, Soil microbial biomass carbon content; MBN, Soil microbial biomass nitrogen content; DOC, Soil dissolved organic carbon content; TRS, Soil total reducing substances content; Y, Rice yield. “*” “**” and “***” indicate significant correlations at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 level, respectively.

参考文献 38

[1]	TIAN S H, SUN X C, XIAO H, et al. Evaluation of rice straw and its transformation products on norfloxacin degradation and antibiotic resistome attenuation during soil incorporation[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 313: 137451.
[2]	杜为研, 唐杉, 汪洪. 我国有机肥资源及产业发展现状[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(3): 210-219.
	DU W Y, TANG S, WANG H. The status of organic fertilizer industry and organic fertilizer resources in China[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020(3): 210-219. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	武淑霞, 刘宏斌, 黄宏坤, 等. 我国畜禽养殖粪污产生量及其资源化分析[J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(5): 103-111.
	WU S X, LIU H B, HUANG H K, et al. Analysis on the amount and utilization of manure in livestock and poultry breeding in China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2018, 20(5): 103-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	QIAN X, GU J, SUN W, et al. Diversity, abundance, and persistence of antibiotic resistance genes in various types of animal manure following industrial composting[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 344: 716-722.
[5]	SINGH G, GUPTA M K, CHAURASIYA S, et al. Rice straw burning: a review on its global prevalence and the sustainable alternatives for its effective mitigation[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(25): 32125-32155.
[6]	ZHOU G X, XU X F, QIU X W, et al. Biochar influences the succession of microbial communities and the metabolic functions during rice straw composting with pig manure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 272: 10-18.
[7]	衣淑娟, 邵浩宸, 沈玉君, 等. 牛粪和玉米秸秆混合好氧堆肥过程分层规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(3): 180-189.
	YI S J, SHAO H C, SHEN Y J, et al. Stratification law of the mixed aerobic composting process of cow manure and maize stovers[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(3): 180-189. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	WAQAS M, HASHIM S, HUMPHRIES U W, et al. Composting processes for agricultural waste management: a comprehensive review[J]. Processes, 2023, 11(3): 731.
[9]	袁京, 刘燕, 唐若兰, 等. 畜禽粪便堆肥过程中碳氮损失及温室气体排放综述[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11): 2428-2438.
	YUAN J, LIU Y, TANG R L, et al. A review of carbon and nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas emissions during livestock manure composting[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2021, 40(11): 2428-2438. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	姜继韶, 侯睿, 崔慧林, 等. 基于Meta分析的蚯蚓堆肥对堆肥质量和重金属的影响效应[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(5): 3047-3058.
	JIANG J S, HOU R, CUI H L, et al. Effects of vermicomposting on compost quality and heavy metals: a meta-analysis[J]. Environmental Science, 2024, 45(5): 3047-3058. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	孙青, 王志葵, 张洪生, 等. 农业有机废弃物生物多效堆肥资源化利用技术规程[J]. 新农业, 2022(18): 4-6.
	SUN Q, WANG Z K, ZHANG H S, et al. Technical specification for multi-effect resource utilization of agricultural organic waste by biological composting[J]. Xin Nongye, 2022(18): 4-6. (in Chinese)
[12]	SMITH P. Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2004, 20(3): 229-236.
[13]	宋鹏慧, 方玉凤, 王晓燕, 等. 不同有机物料育秧基质对水稻秧苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(2): 98-102.
	SONG P H, FANG Y F, WANG X Y, et al. Effect of different organic materials substrate on rice seedling growth and nutrients accumulation[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015(2): 98-102. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	李孟婵, 张鹤, 杨慧珍, 等. 不同原料好氧堆肥过程中碳转化特征及腐殖质组分的变化[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(2): 81-87.
	LI M C, ZHANG H, YANG H Z, et al. Effects of different compost materials on carbon transformation and the change of humus during composting process[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(2): 81-87. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	孙桂阳, 张国言, 董元杰. 不同来源农业废弃物堆肥进程与产品肥效研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4): 349-360.
	SUN G Y, ZHANG G Y, DONG Y J. Composting process of agricultural wastes from different sources and fertilizer efficiency of their products[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(4): 349-360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	陈慧, 何绍浪, 王馨悦, 等. 葛渣综合利用研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 162-168.
	CHEN H, HE S L, WANG X Y, et al. Research progress in comprehensive utilization of Radix pueraria residues[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2023, 35(9): 162-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	黄秋连, 谢璐欣, 杨碧穗, 等. 粉葛农艺性状与品质的相关性研究[J]. 中药材, 2021, 44(7): 1563-1568.
	HUANG Q L, XIE L X, YANG B S, et al. Correlation between agronomic traits and quality of Pueraria lobata[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2021, 44(7): 1563-1568. (in Chinese)
[18]	朱卫丰, 李佳莉, 孟晓伟, 等. 葛属植物的化学成分及药理活性研究进展[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2021, 46(6): 1311-1331.
	ZHU W F, LI J L, MENG X W, et al. Research advances in chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Pueraria genus[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2021, 46(6): 1311-1331. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	王馨悦, 成艳红, 何绍浪, 等. 基于葛渣肥料化利用的蚯蚓转化技术研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(1): 201-208.
	WANG X Y, CHENG Y H, HE S L, et al. Study on earthworm transformation technology based on fertilizer utilization of Pueraria root residue[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 39(1): 201-208. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[21]	LI L J, HAN X Z. Changes of soil properties and carbon fractions after long-term application of organic amendments in Mollisols[J]. CATENA, 2016, 143: 140-144.
[22]	石思博, 王旭东, 叶正钱, 等. 菌渣化肥配施对稻田土壤微生物量碳氮和可溶性碳氮的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23): 8612-8620.
	SHI S B, WANG X D, YE Z Q, et al. Effects of the combination of fungal residue and chemical fertilizer on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in paddy soil[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(23): 8612-8620. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	陈安强, 付斌, 鲁耀, 等. 有机物料输入稻田提高土壤微生物碳氮及可溶性有机碳氮[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(21): 160-167.
	CHEN A Q, FU B, LU Y, et al. Exogenous organic materials applied to paddy field improving soil microbial biomass C, N and dissolved organic C, N[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(21): 160-167. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	谷月, 吴景贵. 有机物料还田土壤碳、氮及微生物量动态影响研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 126-133.
	GU Y, WU J G. Study on dynamic effects of organic materials on soil carbon, nitrogen and microbial biomass[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 126-133. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	何瑞成, 吴景贵. 有机物料对原生盐碱地土壤生物学性质的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(3): 774-782.
	HE R C, WU J G. Effect of amendment of organic materials on soil biological property in primary saline alkali soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(3): 774-782. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	刘猷红, 孟英, 唐傲, 等. 化肥配施有机物料对盐碱地水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022(8): 19-24.
	LIU Y H, MENG Y, TANG A, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer and organic materials on yield and quality of rice in saline-alkali soil[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022(8): 19-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	徐明岗, 于荣, 王伯仁. 土壤活性有机质的研究进展[J]. 土壤肥料, 2000(6): 3-7.
	XU M G, YU R, WANG B R. Research progress of soil active organic matter[J]. Soils and Fertilizers, 2000(6): 3-7. (in Chinese)
[28]	吴富强, 李英梅, 卫拯友, 等. 葛根菌糠生物有机肥在温室蔬菜上的应用效果研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2009, 55(6): 61-63.
	WU F Q, LI Y M, WEI Z Y, et al. Study on the application effect of Pueraria lobata mushroom bran bio-organic fertilizer on greenhouse vegetables[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 55(6): 61-63. (in Chinese)
[29]	CRUTCHIK D, RODRÍGUEZ-VALDECANTOS G, BUSTOS G, et al. Vermiproductivity, maturation and microbiological changes derived from the use of liquid anaerobic digestate during the vermicomposting of market waste[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2020, 82(9): 1781-1794.
[30]	LUO G W, LI L, FRIMAN V P, et al. Organic amendments increase crop yields by improving microbe-mediated soil functioning of agroecosystems: a meta-analysis[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124: 105-115.
[31]	PRZEMIENIECKI S W, SKWIERCZ A, DAMSZEL M, et al. Ecology, biology and enzymatic activity of the rhizosphere planted with Larix decidua seedlings after addition of vermicompost[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021, 168: 104101.
[32]	燕金锐, 律其鑫, 高增平, 等. 有机肥与生物炭对沙化土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(9): 303-307.
	YAN J R, LU Q X, GAO Z P, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer and biochar on physicochemical properties of sandy soil[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(9): 303-307. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	常晓, 张云龙, 徐翎清, 等. 不同氮素形态配比对甜菜氮同化关键酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025(1): 235-242.
	CHANG X, ZHANG Y L, XU L Q, et al. Effects of different nitrogen form ratio on key enzymes of nitrogen assimilation in sugar beet[J/ON]. Crops, 2025(1): 235-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	王璐, 朱占玲, 刘照霞, 等. 多种有机物料混施对苹果幼苗生长、氮素利用及土壤特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(5): 362-368.
	WANG L, ZHU Z L, LIU Z X, et al. Effects of mixtures of different organic materials on apple seedling growth, nitrogen utilization and soil properties[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(5): 362-368. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	邓亚琴, 徐智, 张勇, 等. 土壤微生物生物量氮对不同腐熟度有机肥的响应及对土壤矿质氮的调控作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 137-144.
	DENG Y Q, XU Z, ZHANG Y, et al. Responses of soil microbial biomass nitrogen to organic fertilizer with different degrees of maturity and regu-lation to soil mineral nitrogen[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 137-144. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	李慕嵘, 李霞, 李赟, 等. 开花期渍水对不同施氮量条件下小麦产量及土壤矿质氮的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2024, 37(1): 75-83.
	LI M R, LI X, LI Y, et al. Effects of waterlogging during flowering on wheat yield and soil mineral nitrogen under different nitrogen application rates[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 37(1): 75-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	左红娟. 基于高丰度¹⁵N的肥料氮去向及利用率研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
	ZUO H J. Study of the fate and use efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen based on high abundance of ¹⁵N[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	曾科, 杨兰芳, 于婧, 等. 不同类型作物生长对土壤有效氮构成和氮肥转化利用的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(1): 58-63.
	ZENG K, YANG L F, YU J, et al. Effects of growing of different types of crops on constitution of soil available nitrogen and transformation and utilization of nitrogen fertilizer[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(1): 58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)

不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响

Effects of organic materials on soil microbial biomass, mineral nitrogen content and rice yield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴菊, 杨飞, 吴国泉, 傅贤, 徐晨光. 砂培和土壤栽培对黄瓜生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913.
[2]	朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932.
[3]	裴惠民, 巫明明, 翟荣荣, 叶靖, 金月, 朱仪, 侯建军, 朱国富, 叶胜海. 低镉水稻基因功能与新品种培育研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 2012-2020.
[4]	张智颖, 邱琴, 侯立娟, 徐平, 蒋宁, 林金盛, 李辉平, 曲绍轩, 马林, 王伟霞, 李福后. 杀虫剂施用对秀珍菇和毛木耳的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742.
[5]	严福林, 郎云虎, 简应权, 陈雄飞, 魏巍, 王志威, 安江勇, 任得强, 丁宁, 魏升华. 八爪金龙药材产量与品质对土壤理化性状的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775.
[6]	谭诗逸, 俞国红, 薛向磊, 赵颖雷, 许宝玉, 张成浩. 工厂化水稻育秧盘搬运装置设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1545-1555.
[7]	张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308.
[8]	苏扬, 商小兰, 钱忠明, 吴林根, 黄佳琦, 庄海峰, 赵宇飞, 党洪阳, 徐立军. 腐熟剂与生物炭协同强化秸秆还田对土壤质量和水稻生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1139-1148.
[9]	董智超, 岳宁燕, 吕魏, 余晓燚, 郑凯文, 宋海星, 陈海飞. 高、低含油量油菜品种的产量、品质和氮利用效率对施氮量的响应差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 998-1008.
[10]	李艳翠, 李福强, 周波. 不同生育期亏缺灌溉对蒙古黄芪光合特性、产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 779-789.
[11]	秦宇坤, 陈俊英, 王玉萍, 张丽娟. 减氮增碳对长江流域棉花生产和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 869-879.
[12]	应永飞, 韩东轩, 孟芳, 俞遴, 沈佳栾, 汪开英. 沼液替代化肥对水稻产量、品质和土壤特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 880-891.
[13]	宋欣录, 范书红, 武桄旗, 展梦琪, 侯倩, 李明月, 徐艳. 铜-菲复合污染对分蘖期水稻根系生理特性和污染物积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 521-529.
[14]	雷志伟, 李新欣, 徐恒, 张恒, 朱英, 张华. 利用染色体片段替换系鉴定水稻二化螟抗性QTL[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 530-537.
[15]	谢昶琰, 金雨濛, 张苗, 董青君, 李青, 纪力, 钟平, 陈川, 章安康. 利用河道淤泥开发机插水稻秧苗营养土及其应用效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 538-547.