连作植烟土壤中酚酸物质与土壤因子的关系分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.14

浙江农业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1907-1914.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.14

连作植烟土壤中酚酸物质与土壤因子的关系分析

白羽祥¹, 杨焕文¹, 徐照丽², 吴涛³, 易建华⁴, 王戈^1,*

1.云南农业大学烟草学院,云南昆明 650201;
2.云南省烟草农业科学研究院,云南昆明 650021;
3.云南中烟工业有限责任公司,云南昆明 650224;
4.广西-东盟食品药品安全检验检测中心,广西南宁 530001

收稿日期:2018-01-23 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-12-21
通讯作者: 王戈,E-mail: wangge302@126.com
作者简介:白羽祥(1991—),男,河南驻马店人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为烟草生理生化。E-mail: cotsbyx@163.com
基金资助:
云南省研究生学术新人奖项目(A2008057);中国烟草总公司云南省公司科技重点项目(2017YN07)

Relationship within phenolic acids and soil properties in continuous cropping tobacco soil

BAI Yuxiang¹, YANG Huanwen¹, XU Zhaoli², WU Tao³, YI Jianhua⁴, WANG Ge^1,*

1. College of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China;
2. Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agriculture Science, Kunming 650021, China;
3. China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd, Kunming 650224, China;
4. Guangxi-ASEAN Center for Food and Drug Safety Control, Nanning 530001, China

Received:2018-01-23 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为初步探明连作土壤中酚酸类物质与土壤主要因子的相互关系,以同一植烟区域不同种植年限土壤(1、6、8、14、16 a)为对象,分析不同连作年限植烟土壤酚酸类物质的种类、含量,以及土壤理化性状和酶活性的变化,在相关性分析的基础上,利用逐步回归模型,探讨酚酸类物质与土壤理化性状和酶活性的相互关系。结果表明,连作导致土壤中酚酸类物质积累、植烟土壤酸化和养分失衡。逐步回归分析表明:间苯三酚对pH存在抑制作用,肉桂酸对过氧化氢酶活性存在促进作用,阔马酸对脲酶活性存在抑制作用;间苯三酚、阔马酸和酚酸类物质总量均受到脲酶的抑制作用,对羟基苯甲酸和肉桂酸分别受过氧化氢酶的抑制和促进作用;阿魏酸受脲酶、过氧化氢酶的抑制作用和蔗糖酶的促进作用;间苯三酚、对羟基苯甲酸和酚酸类物质总含量均受土壤pH的抑制作用。

关键词: 连作, 逐步回归分析, 土壤理化性状

Abstract: In order to ascertain the interaction within soil phenolic acids and the main properties of soil, soils of different plantation years (1, 6, 8, 14, 16 a) in the same area were selected as study objects. The types and contents of phenolic acids, soil physicochemical properties and the characteristics of soil enzymes activities were analyzed. On the basis of correlation analysis, the gradual regression model was used to explore relationships within phenolic acids and soil properties in continuous cropping tobacco soil. It was shown that continuous cropping resulted in the accumulation of phenolic acids, decrease of soil pH and nutrient imbalance. Correlation and stepwise regression analysis showed that soil pH was inhibited by phloroglucinol. Catalase activity was increased by cinnamic acid. Urease activity was inhibited by carbamic acid. The contents of phloroglucinol, caramelic acid and total phenolic compounds were inhibited by urease activity. The contents of p-hydroxybenzoic acid and cinnamic acid were either inhibited or increased by catalase activity. Ferulic acid content was inhibited by catalase and urease, yet was increased by invertase. The contents of phloroglucinol, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and total phenolic acids were inhibited by soil pH.

Key words: continuous cropping, stepwise regression analysis, soil physiochemical properties

中图分类号:

S154.4
S572

白羽祥, 杨焕文, 徐照丽, 吴涛, 易建华, 王戈. 连作植烟土壤中酚酸物质与土壤因子的关系分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(11): 1907-1914.

BAI Yuxiang, YANG Huanwen, XU Zhaoli, WU Tao, YI Jianhua, WANG Ge. Relationship within phenolic acids and soil properties in continuous cropping tobacco soil[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 1907-1914.

参考文献

[1] 张先亮, 霍治邦, 吴占清, 等. 西瓜连作障碍成因分析及防治策略探讨[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015 (1): 180-185.
ZHANG X L, HUO Z B, WU Z Q, et al.Analysis on the causes of watermelon continuous cropping obstacle and its control strategy[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015 (1): 180-185. (in Chinese)
[2] 原霁虹, 张尚智. 马铃薯连作障碍的研究进展[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2015 (1): 19-22.
YUAN J H, ZHANG S Z.Research advances in potato continuous cropping obstacles[J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2015 (1): 19-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 吴凤芝, 赵凤艳, 刘元英. 设施蔬菜连作障碍原因综合分析与防治措施[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2000, 31(3): 241-247.
WU F Z, ZHAO F Y, LIU Y Y.On the reasons of continuous cropping obstacles in vegetable facility gardening[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2000, 31(3): 241-247.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 张继光, 申国明, 张久权, 等. 烟草连作障碍研究进展[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(3): 95-99.
ZHANG J G, SHEN G M, ZHANG J Q, et al.Advance in continuous cropping problems of tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2011, 32(3): 95-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 刘术新, 丁枫华, 陈伟祥, 等. 有机肥对长豇豆连作土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(3): 770-774.
LIU S X, DING F H, CHEN W X, et al.Effects of organic fertilizers on soil nutrients and enzyme activities of continuous cropping soil of asparagus bean[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2014, 26(3): 770-774. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 王连君, 谷思玉. 烤烟连作对土壤养分的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2004 (9): 40-42.
WANG L J, GU S Y.Effect of succession cropping of flue-cured tobacco on soil nutrients[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2004 (9): 40-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 何俊瑜, 陈博, 任艳芳, 等. 连作对烤烟根际与非根际土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 39(6): 585-590.
HE J Y, CHEN B, REN Y F, et al.Effect of continuous cropping on soil nutrients at flue-cured tobacco rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2013, 39(6): 585-590. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 李鑫, 张秀丽, 孙冰玉, 等. 烤烟连作对耕层土壤酶活性及微生物区系的影响[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(3): 456-460.
LI X, ZHANG X L, SUN B Y, et al.Effects of continuous cropping in flue-cured tobacco on soil enzyme activities and microbial flora in arable layers of soils[J]. Soils, 2012, 44(3): 456-460. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 陈继峰, 孙会, 夏阳, 等. 不同连作年限烟田土壤酶活性及养分含量变化[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(10): 60-64.
CHEN J F, SUN H, XIA Y, et al.Changes of enzyme activities and nutrient contents in continuous cropping tobacco soil for different years[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 45(10): 60-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 张翼, 张长华, 王振民, 等. 连作对烤烟生长和烟地土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(12): 211-215.
ZHANG Y, ZHANG C H, WANG Z M, et al.The effects on the yields of flue-cured tobacco and activities of main soil enzymes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(12): 211-215. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 徐伟慧, 吴凤芝. 西瓜根际土壤酶及微生物对小麦伴生的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1588-1594.
XU W H, WU F Z.Response of soil enzymes activities and microorganism in rhizosphere of watermelon to wheat as companion crop[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2016, 28(9): 1588-1594. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] BHAT R G, SCHMIDT L S, BROWNE G T.Quantification of Cylindrocarpon sp. in roots of almond and peach trees from orchards affected by Prunus replant disease[J]. Phytopathology, 2011, 101(6): S15.
[13] CHEN S, ZHOU B, LIN S, et al.Accumulation of cinnamic acid and vanillin in eggplant root exudates and the relationship with continuous cropping obstacle[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(14): 2659-2665.
[14] XIAO C L, ZHENG J H, ZOU L Y, et al.Autotoxic effects of root exudates of soybean[J]. Allelopathy Journal, 2006, 18(1): 121-127.
[15] VÁZQUEZ G, FONTENLA E, SANTOS J, et al. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2008, 28(3): 279-285.
[16] YU J Q, MATSUI Y.Effects of root exudates of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and allelochemicals on ion uptake by cucumber seedlings[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1997, 23(3): 817-827.
[17] YE S F, YU J Q, PENG Y H, et al.Incidence of Fusarium wilt in Cucumis sativus L. is promoted by cinnamic acid, an autotoxin in root exudates[J]. Plant and Soil, 2004, 263(1): 143-150.
[18] SCHUTTER M, SANDENO J, DICK R.Seasonal, soil type, and alternative management influences on microbial communities of vegetable cropping systems[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2001, 34(6): 397-410.
[19] LIU P, LIU Z H, WANG C B, et al.Effects of three long-chain fatty acids present in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) root exudates on its own growth and the soil enzymes activities[J]. Allelopathy Journal, 2012, 29(1): 13-24.
[20] LIU P, WAN S B, JIANG L H, et al.Autotoxic potential of root exudates of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)[J]. Allelopathy Journal, 2010, 26(2): 197-206.
[21] QU X H, WANG J G.Effect of amendments with different phenolic acids on soil microbial biomass, activity, and community diversity[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2008, 39(2): 172-179.
[22] 柯文辉. 烟草连作障碍的根际微生态研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2009.
KE W H.Studies on rhizospheric microecology of continuous tobacco cropping obstacle[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 符建国, 易建华, 贾志红, 等. 轮作与连作烟田根际土壤酸性有机组分的初步分离与鉴定[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(6): 67-71.
FU J G, YI J H, JIA Z H, et al.Initial isolation and identification of acidic component of organic compounds in rhizospheric soils of flue-cured tobacco with rotation and mono-cropping[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2011, 32(6): 67-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 陈冬梅, 黄锦文, 柯文辉, 等. 连作烟草根际土壤化感潜力评价及化感物质鉴定[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(1): 46-49.
CHEN D M, HUANG J W, KE W H, et al.Allelopathic evaluation of continuous cropping tobacco rhizospheric soil and allelochemical identification[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2012, 18(1): 46-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 陈冬梅, 杨宇虹, 晋艳, 等. 连作烤烟根际土壤自毒物质成分分析[J]. 草业科学, 2011, 28(10): 1766-1769.
CHEN D M, YANG Y H, JIN Y, et al.Constituents of autotoxic chemical from rhizosphere soil under flue-cured tobacco continuous cropping[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(10): 1766-1769. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 石秋环, 焦枫, 耿伟, 等. 烤烟连作土壤环境中的障碍因子研究综述[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2009, 15(6): 81-84.
SHI Q H, JIAO F, GENG W, et al.An overview on research into factors hindering continuous cropping in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2009, 15(6): 81-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] YU J Q, SHOU S Y, QIAN Y R, et al.Autotoxic potential of cucurbit crops[J]. Plant and Soil, 2000, 223(1/2): 149-153.
[28] 宋慧. 小豆连作障碍中自毒机理研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
SONG H.Autointoxication in adzuki bean replant[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 邵财. 人参连作障碍化感作用研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2009.
SHAO C.Study on allelopathy in continuous cropping obstacle of Panax ginseng[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 李亮亮, 李天来, 张恩平, 等. 四种酚酸物质在土壤中降解的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2010 (6): 1460-1465.
LI L L, LI T L, ZHANG E P, et al.Experimental study on degradation of four phenolic acids in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010 (6): 1460-1465. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 梅守荣. 土壤酶活性及其测定[J]. 上海农业科技, 1985 (1): 17-18.
MEI S R.Soil Enzymes activities and their determination[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 1985 (1): 17-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 孙海兵, 毛志泉, 朱树华. 环渤海湾地区连作苹果园土壤中酚酸类物质变化[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(1): 90-97.
SUN H B, MAO Z Q, ZHU S H.Changes of phenolic acids in the soil of replanted apple orchards surrounding Bohai Gulf[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 90-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 李贺勤, 刘奇志, 张林林, 等. 草莓连作土壤酚酸类物质积累对土壤线虫的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(1): 169-175.
LI H Q, LIU Q Z, ZHANG L L, et al.Accumulation of phenolic acids in the monocultured strawberry soils and their effect on soil nematodes[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(1): 169-175. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 刘艳霞, 李想, 蔡刘体, 等. 烟草根系分泌物酚酸类物质的鉴定及其对根际微生物的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(2): 418-428.
LIU Y X, LI X, CAI L T, et al.Identification of phenolic acids in tobacco root exudates and their role in the growth of rhizosphere microorganisms[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(2): 418-428. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 盘莫谊, 张杨珠, 肖嫩群, 等. 烟草连作对旱地土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2008, 30(3): 295-297.
PAN M Y, ZHANG Y Z, XIAO N Q, et al.Effect of continuous cropping tobacco on the microbes and enzyme activities in dry land soil[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D, 2008, 30(3): 295-297. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 王茂胜, 姜超英, 潘文杰, 等. 不同连作年限的植烟土壤理化性质与微生物群落动态研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(12): 5033-5034.
WANG M S, JIANG C Y, PAN W J, et al.Studying on physico-chemical properties and microbiological community in tobacco-growing soils under different continuous cropping years[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(12): 5033-5034. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 张科, 袁玲, 施娴, 等. 不同植烟模式对烤烟产质量、土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1): 124-128.
ZHANG K, YUAN L, SHI X, et al.Effects of cropping patterns on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco, soil nutrients and enzyme activities[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(1): 124-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] 贾志红, 易建华, 符建国, 等. 烤烟连作与轮作土壤养分差异研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2011, 24(5): 1784-1788.
JIA Z H, YI J H, FU J G, et al.Soil nutrient regular content diversity and relativity analysis on monocropping and rotation with flue-cured tobacco[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 24(5): 1784-1788. (in Chinese with English abstract)

连作植烟土壤中酚酸物质与土壤因子的关系分析

Relationship within phenolic acids and soil properties in continuous cropping tobacco soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张统帅, 闫丽娟, 李广, 陈国鹏, 罗永忠. 免耕和秸秆覆盖对旱作区土壤氮素、水分和春小麦产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341.
[2]	董宇飞, 吕相漳, 张自坤, 贺洪军, 喻景权, 周艳虹. 不同栽培模式对辣椒根际连作土壤微生物区系和酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(9): 1485-1492.
[3]	王燕云, 赵龙杰, 郝春莉, 蔡尽忠. 生物有机肥对不同连作年限设施黄瓜土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 631-638.
[4]	胡志辉, 汪艳杰, 张丽琴. 菜用大豆施肥后荧光、光谱、光合等参数对产量的预测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1355-1362.
[5]	刘紫英, 黄磊, 袁斌, 刘小林, 徐胜光, 黄涛. 一株草莓连作自毒障碍主要物质苯甲酸降解细菌的筛选及其降解效果研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(10): 1699-1704.
[6]	周开胜. 强还原处理改良西瓜连作土壤[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 982-987.
[7]	范琳娟, 刘奇志, 王合, 徐振翔, 李维华. 玉米-苹果轮作体系对苹果根际土壤酶活性和pH值的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 2084-2090.
[8]	徐伟慧, 吴凤芝. 西瓜根际土壤酶及微生物对小麦伴生的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1588-1594.
[9]	李星月1，2，白春启3，刘奇志2，*，李贺勤4，张鸿1. 北京地区连作草莓根际土壤中真滑刃线虫的鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 1018-.
[10]	陈红金1，孙万春2，林辉2，王飞3，王斌4，马军伟2，*，符建荣2. 有机肥施用对蔬菜—土壤体系中重金属迁移累积的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 1041-.
[11]	王志明1，王婕姝1，王毅2，韩向敏1，*，王华1. 甘肃高山细毛羊体重与体尺指标的相关性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(1): 28-.
[12]	刘术新;丁枫华;*;陈伟祥;徐桂芬;程结. 有机肥对长豇豆连作土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. , 2014, 26(3): 0-770774.
[13]	张玉屏;朱德峰;*;林贤青;陈惠哲;金武昌;吴树业. 浙江省连作晚稻产量水平及其种植差异分析[J]. , 2009, 21(05): 0-484.