基于Web of Science数据库的土壤质量评价及其微生物指标研究趋势分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230785

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 2688-2697.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230785

基于Web of Science数据库的土壤质量评价及其微生物指标研究趋势分析

崔玲宇¹(), 喻曼²^,^*(), 乔宇颖², 苏瑶², 王云龙², 沈阿林²

1.浙江农林大学环境与资源学院,浙江杭州 311300
2.浙江省农业科学院环境资源与土壤肥料研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2023-06-21 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-12-04
作者简介:崔玲宇(2000—),女,内蒙古通辽人,硕士研究生,从事土壤生态与健康研究。E-mail:1765841685@qq.com
通讯作者: * 喻曼,E-mail:yuman@zaas.ac.cn
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-03-28)

Research trend of soil quality assessment and microbiological indicators based on Web of Science database

CUI Lingyu¹(), YU Man²^,^*(), QIAO Yuying², SU Yao², WANG Yunlong², SHEN Alin²

1. College of Environment and Resources, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2. Environmental Resources and Soil Fertilizer Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2023-06-21 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为全面客观分析土壤质量评价领域的研究动态和发展趋势,利用知识图谱工具HistCite Pro 2.1、VOSviewer 1.6.19和CiteSpace 6.1.R6软件,基于Web of Science核心合集数据库,就近10年(2012—2022年)土壤质量评价领域的发文量、高被引文章、研究热点和研究趋势等进行计量分析。结果显示,近10年土壤质量评价领域的发文量呈上升趋势。关键词聚类网络划分出土壤健康评价、土壤质量评价、微生物指标3类。应用机器学习算法评价土壤质量、筛选微生物指标构建评价最小数据集是当前土壤质量评价领域的两大研究热点。将机器学习模型应用于不同土壤类型、种植系统和管理措施下评价土壤质量,挖掘土壤核心功能微生物和优势菌种作为微生物评价指标是未来的研究趋势。

关键词: 土壤质量评价, 土壤健康评价, 计量分析, 微生物指标, 机器学习

Abstract:

To clarify the dynamics and trend of soil quality assessment comprehensively and objectively, a bibliometric analysis of the number of published literautres, highly cited articles, research hotspots and trends was conducted based on the Web of Science database pertaining to soil quality assessment in the past 10 years (2012-2022). Knowledge mapping tools, such as softwares of HistCite Pro2.1, VOSviewer 1.6.19 and CiteSpace 6.1.R6 were used. It was shown that there was a consistent increase in the number of published literatures related to soil quality assessment during the past 10 years. The keywords clustering network was divided into three groups, namely, soil health assessment, soil quality evaluation, and microbial indicators. The research hotspots included indicator screening methods and the application of microbial indicators in soil quality/health assessment. Future research trends involved exploring the core functional microorganisms and dominant strains in soil as microbial evaluation indicators and applying machine learning models to evaluate soil quality under different soil types, cropping systems and management measures.

Key words: soil quality assessment, soil health evaluation, bibliometric analysis, microbial indicators, machine learning

中图分类号:

S158

崔玲宇, 喻曼, 乔宇颖, 苏瑶, 王云龙, 沈阿林. 基于Web of Science数据库的土壤质量评价及其微生物指标研究趋势分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2688-2697.

CUI Lingyu, YU Man, QIAO Yuying, SU Yao, WANG Yunlong, SHEN Alin. Research trend of soil quality assessment and microbiological indicators based on Web of Science database[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(11): 2688-2697.

图/表 5

参考文献 51

[1]	司绍诚, 吴宇澄, 李远, 等. 耕地和草地土壤健康研究进展与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(3): 625-642.
	SI S C, WU Y C, LI Y, et al. The current research progress and prospects of cultivated and grassland soil health: a review[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(3): 625-642. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	朱永官, 李刚, 张甘霖, 等. 土壤安全: 从地球关键带到生态系统服务[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12): 1859-1869.
	ZHU Y G, LI G, ZHANG G L, et al. Soil security: from earth's critical zone to ecosystem services[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(12): 1859-1869. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	LAL R. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation[J]. Sustainability, 2015, 7(5): 5875-5895.
[4]	徐明岗, 卢昌艾, 张文菊, 等. 我国耕地质量状况与提升对策[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(7): 8-14.
	XU M G, LU C A, ZHANG W J, et al. Situation of the quality of arable land in China and improvement strategy[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(7): 8-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	张淑香, 张文菊, 沈仁芳, 等. 我国典型农田长期施肥土壤肥力变化与研究展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(6): 1389-1393.
	ZHANG S X, ZHANG W J, SHEN R F, et al. Variation of soil quality in typical farmlands in China under long-term fertilization and research expedition[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(6): 1389-1393. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	GHOLAMHOSSEINIAN A, BASHTIAN M H, SEPEHR A. Soil quality: concepts, importance, indicators, and measurement[M]//RAKSHIT A, GHOSH S, VASENEV V, et al. Soils in urban ecosystem. Singapore: Springer, 2022: 161-187.
[7]	张宇恒, 王忠诚, 王亚楠, 等. 基于最小数据集沂蒙山区不同治理模式下的土壤质量评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(1): 241-247.
	ZHANG Y H, WANG Z C, WANG Y N, et al. Soil quality evaluation with different treatment models in Yimeng mountainous area based on minimum data set[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(1): 241-247. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	田英, 许喆, 王娅丽, 等. 宁夏银川平原沙化土地不同人工林土壤质量评价[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(4): 1515-1525.
	TIAN Y, XU Z, WANG Y L, et al. Soil quality evaluation for different forest plantation of sandy land in Yinchuan Plain, Ningxia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(4): 1515-1525. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	林湘岷, 沈宗专, 李荣, 等. 基于Web of Science的抑病型土壤文献计量分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(3): 821-829.
	LIN X M, SHEN Z Z, LI R, et al. Bibliometric study of the papers in the field of disease-suppressive soil based on the Web of Science database[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 38(3): 821-829. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	史方颖, 张风宝, 杨明义. 基于文献计量分析的土壤有机碳矿化研究进展与热点[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(2): 381-392.
	SHI F Y, ZHANG F B, YANG M Y. Research hotspots and progress of soil organic carbon mineralization based on bibliometrics method[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(2): 381-392. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	吴内, 严康, 汪海珍. 基于Web of Science对铁载体研究现状和趋势的计量分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2023, 43(5): 471-485.
	WU N, YAN K, WANG H Z. Bibliometric analysis of status and trend of the research on siderophores based on the Web of Science database[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2023, 43(5): 471-485. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	李鑫, 张文菊, 邬磊, 等. 土壤质量评价指标体系的构建及评价方法[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(14): 3043-3056.
	LI X, ZHANG W J, WU L, et al. Advance in indicator screening and methodologies of soil quality evaluation[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(14): 3043-3056. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	张俊伶, 张江周, 申建波, 等. 土壤健康与农业绿色发展:机遇与对策[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(4): 783-796.
	ZHANG J L, ZHANG J Z, SHEN J B, et al. Soil health and agriculture green development: opportunities and challenges[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(4): 783-796. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	王怀嵩, 张涛. 农业土壤健康评价体系研究进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(9): 1093-1100.
	WANG H S, ZHANG T. Research progress of agricultural soil health evaluation system[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(9): 1093-1100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	BÜNEMANN E K, BONGIORNO G, BAI Z G, et al. Soil quality: a critical review[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 120: 105-125.
[16]	RAHMANIPOUR F, MARZAIOLI R, ALI BAHRAMI H, et al. Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 40: 19-26.
[17]	RAIESI F. A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 75: 307-320.
[18]	ARMENISE E, REDMILE-GORDON M A, STELLACCI A M, et al. Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 130: 91-98.
[19]	LI P, ZHANG T L, WANG X X, et al. Development of biological soil quality indicator system for subtropical China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 126: 112-118.
[20]	YAO R J, YANG J S, GAO P, et al. Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 128: 137-148.
[21]	VASU D, SINGH S K, RAY S K, et al. Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan Plateau, India[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 282: 70-79.
[22]	YU P J, LIU S W, ZHANG L, et al. Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616/617: 564-571.
[23]	GUO L L, SUN Z G, OUYANG Z, et al. A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River[J]. CATENA, 2017, 152: 135-143.
[24]	CHEN Y D, WANG H Y, ZHOU J M, et al. Minimum data set for assessing soil quality in farmland of northeast China[J]. Pedosphere, 2013, 23(5): 564-576.
[25]	LEHMANN J, BOSSIO D A, KÖGEL-KNABNER I, et al. The concept and future prospects of soil health[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1(10): 544-553.
[26]	BONFANTE A, BASILE A, BOUMA J. Targeting the soil quality and soil health concepts when aiming for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the EU Green Deal[J]. Soil, 2020, 6(2): 453-466.
[27]	CHOUDHURY B U, MANDAL S. Indexing soil properties through constructing minimum datasets for soil quality assessment of surface and profile soils of intermontane valley (Barak, North East India)[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 123: 107369.
[28]	ABDEL-FATTAH M K, MOHAMED E S, WAGDI E M, et al. Quantitative evaluation of soil quality using principal component analysis: the case study of El-Fayoum depression Egypt[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(4): 1824.
[29]	JIN H F, SHI D M, LOU Y B, et al. Evaluation of the quality of cultivated-layer soil based on different degrees of erosion in sloping farmland with purple soil in China[J]. CATENA, 2021, 198: 105048.
[30]	VALANI G P, VEZZANI F M, CAVALIERI-POLIZELI K M V. Soil quality: evaluation of on-farm assessments in relation to analytical index[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 198: 104565.
[31]	ÇELIK İ, GÜNAL H, ACIR N, et al. Soil quality assessment to compare tillage systems in Cukurova Plain, Turkey[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 208: 104892.
[32]	LIU Y L, LI J L, LIU C, et al. Evaluation of cultivated land quality using attention mechanism-back propagation neural network[J]. PeerJ Computer Science, 2022, 8: e948.
[33]	APARICIO V, COSTA J L. Soil quality indicators under continuous cropping systems in the Argentinean Pampas[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007, 96(1/2): 155-165.
[34]	D'HAENE K. An indicator for soil physical quality in integrated sustainability assessment models[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2012, 58(sup1): S66-S70.
[35]	CIARKOWSKA K, GAMBUS F. Building a quality index for soils impacted by proximity to an industrial complex using statistical and data-mining methods[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 740: 140161.
[36]	LI P F, ZHANG H J, DENG J J, et al. Cover crop by irrigation and fertilization improves soil health and maize yield: establishing a soil health index[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2023, 182: 104727.
[37]	WILHELM R C, VAN ES H M, BUCKLEY D H. Predicting measures of soil health using the microbiome and supervised machine learning[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 164: 108472.
[38]	SHAO W Y, GUAN Q Y, TAN Z, et al. Application of BP-ANN model in evaluation of soil quality in the arid area, northwest China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 208: 104907.
[39]	WANG H F, YAO L P, HUANG B, et al. An integrated approach to exploring soil fertility from the perspective of rice (Oryza sativa L.) yields[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 194: 104322.
[40]	MICUŢI M M, POPA A, BĂDULESCU L, et al. Soil enzymes: bioindicators of soil health[J]. Scientific Papers: Series B Horticulture, 2020, 61(1): 679-684.
[41]	UTOBO E B, TEWARI L. Soil enzymes as bioindicators of soil ecosystem status[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2015, 13(1): 147-169.
[42]	BURNS R G, DEFOREST J L, MARXSEN J, et al. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 58: 216-234.
[43]	LIU Z J, ZHOU W, SHEN J B, et al. Soil quality assessment of yellow clayey paddy soils with different productivity[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2014, 50(3): 537-548.
[44]	LIU Z J, ZHOU W, LI S T, et al. Assessing soil quality of gleyed paddy soils with different productivities in subtropical China[J]. CATENA, 2015, 133: 293-302.
[45]	LIU J, WU L C, CHEN D, et al. Soil quality assessment of different Camellia oleifera stands in mid-subtropical China[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 113: 29-35.
[46]	SHARMA S K, RAMESH A, SHARMA M P, et al. Microbial community structure and diversity as indicators for evaluating soil quality[M]//LICHTFOUSE E. Biodiversity, biofuels, agroforestry and conservation agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010: 317-358.
[47]	KIM H, PARK Y H, YANG J E, et al. Analysis of major bacteria and diversity of surface soil to discover biomarkers related to soil health[J]. Toxics, 2022, 10(3): 117.
[48]	LIN Y B, YE Y M, WU C F, et al. Comprehensive assessment of paddy soil quality under land consolidation: a novel perspective of microbiology[J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7: e7351.
[49]	LIU Z J, ZHOU W, LV J L, et al. A simple evaluation of soil quality of waterlogged purple paddy soils with different productivities[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0127690.
[50]	WANG D W, BAI J H, WANG W, et al. Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for different wetlands in a Chinese delta[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29(10): 3783-3794.
[51]	DENG Y L, WANG Z C, LU S, et al. Soil quality assessment via the factor analysis of Karst rocky desertification areas in Hunan, China[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2022, 38(1): 248-261.

排名 Rank	国家 Country	NPL	P/%	LCS	GCS	TCPL
1	中国China	153	34.15	323	3 088	20.18
2	美国America	73	16.29	101	1 448	19.84
3	印度India	48	10.71	42	545	11.35
4	西班牙Spain	27	6.03	11	769	28.48
5	荷兰Netherlands	25	5.58	83	1863	74.52
6	巴西Brazil	24	5.36	5	375	15.63
7	加拿大Canada	20	4.46	30	514	25.70
8	德国Germany	17	3.79	6	353	20.76
9	意大利Italy	17	3.79	75	643	37.82
10	波兰Poland	15	3.35	5	364	24.27

排名 Rank	国家 Country	NPL	P/%	LCS	GCS	TCPL
1	中国China	153	34.15	323	3 088	20.18
2	美国America	73	16.29	101	1 448	19.84
3	印度India	48	10.71	42	545	11.35
4	西班牙Spain	27	6.03	11	769	28.48
5	荷兰Netherlands	25	5.58	83	1863	74.52
6	巴西Brazil	24	5.36	5	375	15.63
7	加拿大Canada	20	4.46	30	514	25.70
8	德国Germany	17	3.79	6	353	20.76
9	意大利Italy	17	3.79	75	643	37.82
10	波兰Poland	15	3.35	5	364	24.27

排名 Rank	标题 Title	第一作者 First author	国家 Country	发表年份 Year of publication	LCS
1	Soil quality: a critical review土壤质量:综述	Bünemann E K	瑞士Switzerland	2018	66
2	Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran 伊朗加兹温省农田土壤质量评价研究	Rahmanipour F	伊朗Iran	2014	35
3	A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions 基于最小数据集和土壤质量指数量化不同土地利用方式对干旱和半干旱地区原生牧场土壤质量的影响	Raiesi F	伊朗Iran	2017	33
4	Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment 基于土壤质量指数的地中海环境下不同农业管理方式的土壤肥力比较	Armenise E	英国Britain	2013	28
5	Development of biological soil quality indicator system for subtropical China 中国亚热带地区土壤质量生物评价指标筛选研究	Li P	中国China	2013	25
6	Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area 基于最小数据集的典型滨海盐碱地土壤质量评价	Yao R J	中国China	2013	25
7	Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan plateau, India 应用土壤质量指数(SQI)评估印度半干旱地区德干高原的作物生产力	Vasu D	印度India	2016	25
8	Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China 中国东北地区不同土地利用条件下碱性土壤评价的最小数据集与质量指数研究	Yu P J	中国China	2018	25
9	A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River 基于不同评价方法的黄河下游土壤质量评价	Guo L L	中国China	2017	25
10	Minimum data set for assessing soil quality in farmland of Northeast China 基于最小数据集的中国东北农田土壤质量评价	Chen Y D	中国China	2013	21

排名 Rank	标题 Title	第一作者 First author	国家 Country	发表年份 Year of publication	LCS
1	Soil quality: a critical review土壤质量:综述	Bünemann E K	瑞士Switzerland	2018	66
2	Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran 伊朗加兹温省农田土壤质量评价研究	Rahmanipour F	伊朗Iran	2014	35
3	A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions 基于最小数据集和土壤质量指数量化不同土地利用方式对干旱和半干旱地区原生牧场土壤质量的影响	Raiesi F	伊朗Iran	2017	33
4	Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment 基于土壤质量指数的地中海环境下不同农业管理方式的土壤肥力比较	Armenise E	英国Britain	2013	28
5	Development of biological soil quality indicator system for subtropical China 中国亚热带地区土壤质量生物评价指标筛选研究	Li P	中国China	2013	25
6	Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area 基于最小数据集的典型滨海盐碱地土壤质量评价	Yao R J	中国China	2013	25
7	Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan plateau, India 应用土壤质量指数(SQI)评估印度半干旱地区德干高原的作物生产力	Vasu D	印度India	2016	25
8	Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China 中国东北地区不同土地利用条件下碱性土壤评价的最小数据集与质量指数研究	Yu P J	中国China	2018	25
9	A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River 基于不同评价方法的黄河下游土壤质量评价	Guo L L	中国China	2017	25
10	Minimum data set for assessing soil quality in farmland of Northeast China 基于最小数据集的中国东北农田土壤质量评价	Chen Y D	中国China	2013	21

基于Web of Science数据库的土壤质量评价及其微生物指标研究趋势分析

Research trend of soil quality assessment and microbiological indicators based on Web of Science database

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 51

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张梦, 佘宝, 杨玉莹, 黄林生, 朱梦琦. 基于无人机RGB影像的大豆种植区提取方法研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 952-961.
[2]	郭晗, 陆洲, 徐飞飞, 罗明, 张序. 基于全局敏感性分析与机器学习的冬小麦叶面积指数估算[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 2020-2031.
[3]	周欣兴, 赵林, 张文杰, 谭昌伟, 李刚波, 石梦云, 张婷, 杨峰. 基于Sentinel-2多时相影像的果树种植区遥感提取[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2767-2777.
[4]	王念一, 于丰华, 许童羽, 杜文, 郭忠辉, 张国圣. 基于机器学习的粳稻叶片叶绿素含量高光谱反演建模[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 359-366.
[5]	杨红云, 罗建军, 孙爱珍, 万颖, 易文龙. 基于图像特征的水稻叶片全氮含量估测模型研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2232-2243.