不同土壤调理剂对镉汞复合污染稻田安全生产和稻米铁锌含量的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.02.19

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 417-424.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.02.19

不同土壤调理剂对镉汞复合污染稻田安全生产和稻米铁锌含量的影响

伍少福¹(), 倪元君², 詹丽钏², 彭璐³, 吴英杰³^,^*()

1.绍兴市粮油作物技术推广中心,浙江绍兴 312000
2.嵊州市农业技术推广中心,浙江嵊州 312400
3.四川农业大学资源学院,四川成都 611130

收稿日期:2022-01-07 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-03-14
通讯作者: 吴英杰
作者简介:*吴英杰,E-mail:yingjiewu@sicau.edu.cn
伍少福(1981—),男,湖南耒阳人,硕士,高级农艺师,主要从事土壤改良与施肥技术研究与推广工作。E-mail:sf_wu@163.com
基金资助:
四川农业大学人才引进项目(031-2122996037);浙江省土壤污染生物修复重点实验室开放基金(FSLAB2021003);绍兴市土壤修复治理试点项目

Effects of different soil amendments on safe production and iron and zinc contents of rice in cadmium and mercury compound polluted soil

WU Shaofu¹(), NI Yuanjun², ZHAN Lichuan², PENG Lu³, WU Yingjie³^,^*()

1. Shaoxing Grain and Oil Crop Technology Promotion Center, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China
2. Shengzhou Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Shengzhou 312400, Zhejiang, China
3. College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China

Received:2022-01-07 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-03-14
Contact: WU Yingjie

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以位于浙江省绍兴市某地的酸性镉汞复合污染稻田为对象,以不施用土壤调理剂作为对照(CK),通过随机区组试验比较了3种土壤调理剂对水稻安全生产和稻米铁、锌含量的影响。结果表明:与CK相比,所施用的3种土壤调理剂均能显著(P<0.05)降低土壤有效态Cd和Hg的含量,并将糙米中的Cd、Hg含量降至国家标准限量范围以下,满足水稻安全生产的要求。其中,自主研发的2号土壤调理剂还可显著提高糙米中的Fe、Zn含量,既可保障镉汞复合污染农田的水稻安全生产,又能增强稻米品质,是试验条件下的最佳选择。

关键词: 土壤调理剂, 稻米, 重金属, 微量元素

Abstract:

In this study, a randomized block experiment was performed in a cadmium (Cd)-mercury (Hg) compound polluted paddy field in Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, China. The treatment without application of soil amendments was selected as the control (CK), and the effects of different soil amendments on the safe production and iron (Fe), zinc (Zn) contents of rice were compared. It was shown that all the three soil amendments could significantly (P<0.05) decrease the contents of soil available Cd and Hg, and decrease the content of Cd and Hg in brown rice below the limitation of the national standard, thus guarantee the safe production of rice. Among the tested soil amendments, the self-developed soil amendments No. 2 could also significantly (P<0.05) increase Fe, Zn content in brown rice, which not only safeguards the rice production in the Cd-Hg compound polluted soil, but also enhances the nutritional quality of rice, and is the best choice under the experiment conditions.

Key words: soil amendments, rice, heavy metal, trace elements

中图分类号:

S143.91
S511

伍少福, 倪元君, 詹丽钏, 彭璐, 吴英杰. 不同土壤调理剂对镉汞复合污染稻田安全生产和稻米铁锌含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 417-424.

WU Shaofu, NI Yuanjun, ZHAN Lichuan, PENG Lu, WU Yingjie. Effects of different soil amendments on safe production and iron and zinc contents of rice in cadmium and mercury compound polluted soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 417-424.

图/表 6

参考文献 30

[1]	环境保护部, 国土资源部. 全国土壤污染状况调查公报[R/OL]. ( 2014-04-17) [2022-01-07]. http://www.gov.cn/foot/site1/20140417/782bcb88840814ba158d01.pdf.
[2]	黄冬芬, 奚岭林, 杨立年, 等. 不同耐镉基因型水稻农艺和生理性状的比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(5): 809-817.
	HUANG D F, XI L L, YANG L N, et al. Comparisons in agronomic and physiological traits of rice genotypes differing in cadmium-tolerance[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(5): 809-817. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	ADRIANO D C, WENZEL W W, VANGRONSVELD J, et al. Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup[J]. Geoderma, 2004, 122(2/3/4): 121-142.
[4]	ZHOU Y Y, TANG L, ZENG G M, et al. Current progress in biosensors for heavy metal ions based on DNAzymes/DNA molecules functionalized nanostructures: a review[J]. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016, 223: 280-294.
[5]	TANG X, LI Q, WU M, et al. Review of remediation practices regarding cadmium-enriched farmland soil with particular reference to China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 181: 646-662.
[6]	LEE S H, LEE J S, JEONG CHOI Y, et al. In situ stabilization of cadmium-, lead-, and zinc-contaminated soil using various amendments[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 77(8): 1069-1075.
[7]	MENCH M, RENELLA G, GELSOMINO A, et al. Biochemical parameters and bacterial species richness in soils contaminated by sludge-borne metals and remediated with inorganic soil amendments[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 144(1): 24-31.
[8]	何凤鹏, 谷雨, 冯光辉, 等. 不同类型土壤调理剂对土壤-水稻系统重金属含量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2016(5): 31-34.
	HE F P, GU Y, FENG G H, et al. Effects of different types of soil conditioners on heavy metal content in soil-rice system[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2016(5): 31-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	曾鹏, 蒋毅, 辜娇峰, 等. 多元复合调理剂对镉砷污染农田土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(8): 3740-3748.
	ZENG P, JIANG Y, GU J F, et al. Effects of the multi-composite amendment on soil microbial community structure in Cd and As-contaminated paddy soil[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(8): 3740-3748. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	周利军, 武琳, 林小兵, 等. 土壤调理剂对镉污染稻田修复效果[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(11): 5098-5106.
	ZHOU L J, WU L, LIN X B, et al. Remediation of cadmium contaminated paddy fields using soil conditioners[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(11): 5098-5106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	田中学. 四种土壤调理剂对污染土壤镉行为的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2017.
	TIAN Z X. Effect of four soil amendments on behavior of cadmium in polluted soil[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	辜娇峰, 周航, 贾润语, 等. 三元土壤调理剂对田间水稻镉砷累积转运的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(4): 1910-1917.
	GU J F, ZHOU H, JIA R Y, et al. Effects of a tribasic amendment on cadmium and arsenic accumulation and translocation in rice in a field experiment[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(4): 1910-1917. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	李心, 林大松, 刘岩, 等. 不同土壤调理剂对镉污染水稻田控镉效应研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(7): 1511-1520.
	LI X, LIN D S, LIU Y, et al. Effects of different soil conditioners on cadmium control in cadmium-contaminated paddy fields[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018, 37(7): 1511-1520. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	SUN Y B, XU Y, XU Y M, et al. Reliability and stability of immobilization remediation of Cd polluted soils using sepiolite under pot and field trials[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 208: 739-746.
[15]	RAO Z X, HUANG D Y, ZHU Q H, et al. Effects of amendments on the availability of Cd in contaminated paddy soil: a three-year field experiment[J]. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2013, 11(3): 2009-2014.
[16]	于寿娜, 廖敏, 黄昌勇. 镉、汞复合污染对土壤脲酶和酸性磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(8): 1841-1847.
	YU S N, LIAO M, HUANG C Y. Effects of cadmium and mercury combined pollution on soil urease and acid phosphatase activities[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(8): 1841-1847. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	陈芬, 余高, 吴涵茜, 等. 中药渣生物有机肥对镉-汞复合污染土壤的钝化效果[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 46(6): 737-747.
	CHEN F, YU G, WU H Q, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer made from Chinese traditional herb residues on heavy metal passivation in Cd and Hg compound-contaminated soils[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2020, 46(6): 737-747. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	CAKMAK I, KUTMAN U B. Agronomic biofortification of cereals with zinc: a review[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 69(1):172-180.
[19]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[20]	张肖静, 陈涛, 傅浩强. 土壤中重金属有效态汞的快速检测[J]. 轻工学报, 2018, 33(1): 49-55.
	ZHANG X J, CHEN T, FU H Q. Quick detection of heavy metal absorbable mercury in soil[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2018, 33(1): 49-55. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	LI H, LIU Y, ZHOU Y Y, et al. Effects of red mud based passivator on the transformation of Cd fraction in acidic Cd-polluted paddy soil and Cd absorption in rice[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 640/641: 736-745.
[22]	窦韦强, 安毅, 秦莉, 等. 土壤pH对汞迁移转化的影响研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(1): 1-8.
	DOU W Q, AN Y, QIN L, et al. Research progress on effects of soil pH on migration and transformation of mercury[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2019, 36(1): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	LI H, LUO N, LI Y W, et al. Cadmium in rice: transport mechanisms, influencing factors, and minimizing measures[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 224: 622-630.
[24]	WU Y J, ZHOU H, ZOU Z J, et al. A three-year in situ study on the persistence of a combined amendment (limestone+sepiolite) for remedying paddy soil polluted with heavy metals[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2016, 130: 163-170.
[25]	GU J F, ZHOU H, TANG H L, et al. Cadmium and arsenic accumulation during the rice growth period under in situ remediation[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 171: 451-459.
[26]	戴佰林. 重金属污染水稻中镉的减量化控制技术研究[D]. 株洲: 湖南工业大学, 2015.
	DAI B L. Studies on the reduction control technology of cadmium in heavy metal polluted rice[D]. Zhuzhou: Hunan University of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	王艳, 兰向东, 陈钊, 等. 糙米、胚芽米和精白米营养成分分析[J]. 食品科技, 2016, 41(11): 156-159.
	WANG Y, LAN X D, CHEN Z, et al. Analysis of nutrition components in brown rice, germinated rice, and polished rice[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2016, 41(11): 156-159. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	赵莎莎, 肖广全, 陈玉成, 等. 不同施用量石灰和生物炭对稻田镉污染钝化的延续效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1): 334-340.
	ZHAO S S, XIAO G Q, CHEN Y C, et al. Continuous effect of different application rates of lime and biochar on the passivation of cadmium pollution in paddy fields[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(1): 334-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	鄢德梅, 郭朝晖, 黄凤莲, 等. 钙镁磷肥对石灰、海泡石组配修复镉污染稻田土壤的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(3): 1491-1497.
	YAN D M, GUO Z H, HUANG F L, et al. Effect of calcium magnesium phosphate on remediation paddy soil contaminated with cadmium using lime and sepiolite[J]. Environmental Science, 2020, 41(3): 1491-1497. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	谢晓梅, 方至萍, 廖敏, 等. 低积累水稻品种联合腐殖酸、海泡石保障重镉污染稻田安全生产的潜力[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(9): 4348-4358.
	XIE X M, FANG Z P, LIAO M, et al. Potential to ensure safe production from rice fields polluted with heavy cadmium by combining a rice variety with low cadmium accumulation, humic acid, and sepiolite[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(9): 4348-4358. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	pH	有效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg^-1)	Fe/(mg·kg^-1)	Zn/(mg·kg^-1)
CK	4.92±0.13 c	41.37±1.58 a	111.09±4.32 b	11 272.65±219.34 b	49.75±2.63 b
T1	5.86±0.01 a	31.96±2.11 c	109.27±5.68 b	10 946.22±265.11 b	47.87±4.83 b
T2	5.25±0.31 b	35.51±1.07 b	107.42±3.56 b	11 323.53±255.66 b	47.76±1.29 b
T3	5.68±0.32 a	42.68±1.22 a	145.86±2.65 a	12 143.09±493.85 a	64.88±6.48 a

处理 Treatment	pH	有效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg^-1)	Fe/(mg·kg^-1)	Zn/(mg·kg^-1)
CK	4.92±0.13 c	41.37±1.58 a	111.09±4.32 b	11 272.65±219.34 b	49.75±2.63 b
T1	5.86±0.01 a	31.96±2.11 c	109.27±5.68 b	10 946.22±265.11 b	47.87±4.83 b
T2	5.25±0.31 b	35.51±1.07 b	107.42±3.56 b	11 323.53±255.66 b	47.76±1.29 b
T3	5.68±0.32 a	42.68±1.22 a	145.86±2.65 a	12 143.09±493.85 a	64.88±6.48 a

重金属 Heavy metal	处理 Treatment	根 Root	秸秆 Straw	谷壳 Husk	糙米 Brown rice
Cd	CK	8.54±2.06 a	1.58±0.11 a	0.66±0.04 a	0.80±0.08 a
	T1	7.10±1.40 b	1.40±0.17 a	0.55±0.02 ab	0.44±0.07 b
	T2	6.36±0.87 b	1.30±0.13 a	0.40±0.01 b	0.40±0.01 b
	T3	7.51±3.00 b	1.53±0.38 a	0.52±0.20 ab	0.48±0.20 b
Hg	CK	1.174±0.249 a	0.046±0.001 a	0.051±0.005 a	0.049±0.003 a
	T1	0.887±0.195 b	0.038±0.010 a	0.043±0.018 a	0.039±0.007 a
	T2	0.617±0.140 b	0.039±0.005 a	0.037±0.005 a	0.040±0.002 a
	T3	0.828±0.215 b	0.044±0.003 a	0.051±0.012 a	0.048±0.008 a

重金属 Heavy metal	处理 Treatment	根 Root	秸秆 Straw	谷壳 Husk	糙米 Brown rice
Cd	CK	8.54±2.06 a	1.58±0.11 a	0.66±0.04 a	0.80±0.08 a
	T1	7.10±1.40 b	1.40±0.17 a	0.55±0.02 ab	0.44±0.07 b
	T2	6.36±0.87 b	1.30±0.13 a	0.40±0.01 b	0.40±0.01 b
	T3	7.51±3.00 b	1.53±0.38 a	0.52±0.20 ab	0.48±0.20 b
Hg	CK	1.174±0.249 a	0.046±0.001 a	0.051±0.005 a	0.049±0.003 a
	T1	0.887±0.195 b	0.038±0.010 a	0.043±0.018 a	0.039±0.007 a
	T2	0.617±0.140 b	0.039±0.005 a	0.037±0.005 a	0.040±0.002 a
	T3	0.828±0.215 b	0.044±0.003 a	0.051±0.012 a	0.048±0.008 a

处理 Treatments	根 Root	秸秆 Straw	稻穗 Rice ears
CK	18.25±3.32 b	52.29±0.36 a	24.09±1.14 a
T1	24.17±0.59 a	48.76±5.76 a	19.92±4.98 a
T2	26.59±0.86 a	42.66±5.60 ab	24.25±2.64 a
T3	24.83±0.44 a	34.76±2.53 b	20.10±0.08 a

不同土壤调理剂对镉汞复合污染稻田安全生产和稻米铁锌含量的影响

Effects of different soil amendments on safe production and iron and zinc contents of rice in cadmium and mercury compound polluted soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

处理 Treatment	Fe	Zn
CK	5.25±1.82 b	36.18±1.09 b
T1	5.95±0.29 b	38.78±0.44 b
T2	5.03±0.69 b	39.46±0.19 b
T3	21.57±5.74 a	60.84±1.44 a

[1]	王晨, 张敏, 王振旗, 钱晓雍, 徐昶, 倪远之, 李金文, 沈根祥. 长期施用猪粪稻田的重金属迁移规律与累积风险[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1985-1994.
[2]	娄飞, 付天岭, 代良羽, 周凯, 林大松, 何腾兵. 不同土壤调理剂对黔中地区水稻Cd积累转运和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1493-1501.
[3]	吴涛, 江小帆, 杨发荣, 魏玉明, 陈国顺, 蔡原, 焦婷, 黄杰, 赵生国. 日粮中不同藜麦添加水平对芦花鸡肉品质及微量元素的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 897-907.
[4]	张棚, 杨雪妍, 洪晶, 张娅俐, 田晓静, 张福梅, 曹竑, 陈士恩, 马忠仁, 丁功涛, 宋礼, 罗丽. 贵州湄潭茶区土壤-茶叶系统中微量元素富集规律与产地溯源[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 378-390.
[5]	孙丽萍, 白琳琳, 干雅婷, 陈雪雲, 王柳, 张宜明, 何开雨, 徐霞红. 基于DNA G-四链体的农兽药残留与重金属离子快速检测研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1770-1778.
[6]	陈闺, 周杰文, 李海平, 张发明, 李春顺, 柳立, 张毅. 土壤调理剂施用对植烟酸化土壤pH值和烤烟根系特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1275-1282.
[7]	张棚, 张希, 杨雪妍, 刘元林, 李儒, 龙鸣, 田晓静, 张福梅, 陈士恩, 马忠仁. 基于微量元素分析的三七产地及其主侧根鉴别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1300-1308.
[8]	朱芸, 郭彬, 林义成, 傅庆林, 刘琛, 李凝玉, 李华. 新型矿基土壤调理剂对滨海盐土理化性状和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 885-892.
[9]	熊廷浩, 黄益国, 周旋, 鲁艳红, 资涛, 胡宇倩, 宋海星. 湖南省油菜主产区土壤养分含量与重金属污染风险评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1904-1912.
[10]	陈德, 赵首萍, 叶雪珠, 张棋, 肖文丹, 阮弋飞, 伍少福. 不同钝化剂对小米椒吸收和积累镉的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1921-1930.
[11]	钱家炜, 刘晓青, 张静静, 周卫红, 李建龙. 张家港市农田土壤重金属含量高光谱遥感监测模型构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1437-1445.
[12]	刘春林, 张建, 彭益书, 倪莘然, 杨瑞东. 贵州雷山茶区土壤-茶叶重金属含量特征及饮茶风险评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1049-1059.
[13]	倪治华, 孙万春, 林辉, 钟杭, 朱伟锋, 陆若辉, 马军伟. 浙江省畜禽粪源有机肥质量安全风险与控制对策[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 299-307.
[14]	黄健, 肖建中, 唐世刚, 郑强, 丁枫华, 张东旭. 添加蒙脱石对猪粪好氧堆肥腐熟度和重金属钝化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 141-148.
[15]	邴静静, 高红梅. 基于SWOT分析的天津市优质稻米产业发展研究--以"小站稻"为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1217-1223.