新型矿基土壤调理剂对滨海盐土理化性状和水稻产量的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.14

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 885-892.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.14

新型矿基土壤调理剂对滨海盐土理化性状和水稻产量的影响

朱芸¹^,²(), 郭彬², 林义成², 傅庆林²^,^*(), 刘琛², 李凝玉², 李华²

1.浙江农林大学环境与资源学院,浙江杭州 311300
2.浙江省农业科学院环境资源与土壤肥料研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2020-12-01 出版日期:2021-05-25 发布日期:2021-05-25
通讯作者: 傅庆林
作者简介:*傅庆林,E-mail:Fuql161@aliyun.com
朱芸(1995—),女,江苏连云港人,硕士研究生,主要从事盐碱土改良研究。E-mail:zhu052419952020@outlook.com
基金资助:
浙江省重点研发计划(2019C02008);浙江省重点研发计划(2020C02001-13)

Effects of self-developed soil conditioner on soil physiochemical properties and rice yield in coastal saline soil

ZHU Yun¹^,²(), GUO Bin², LIN Yicheng², FU Qinglin²^,^*(), LIU Chen², LI Ningyu², LI Hua²

1. College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2. Institute of Environment, Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2020-12-01 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-05-25
Contact: FU Qinglin

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以自主研发的矿基土壤调理剂为试验材料,采用盆栽方法研究了土壤调理剂不同施用量(0、5.0、7.5、10.0、12.5 g·kg^-1)对滨海盐土理化性状[pH值、土壤电导率(EC),及有机质、全氮、碱解氮、速效钾、有效磷含量]、水稻养分吸收和产量的影响。结果表明,施用土壤调理剂后,土壤pH值、EC值和速效钾含量与不施土壤调理剂的对照相比显著(P<0.05)降低,而土壤有机质、全氮、碱解氮、有效磷含量,水稻秸秆、籽粒中的全氮、全磷和全钾含量,以及水稻株高、生物量和产量显著(P<0.05)增加。水稻的有效穗数、每穗粒数、株高、千粒重、生物量和产量与土壤pH值和EC值呈极显著(P<0.01)负相关,与土壤的有机质、全氮、碱解氮和有效磷含量呈显著(P<0.05)正相关,与速效钾含量无显著相关性。各施用量下,以10 g·kg^-1处理的效果最优。研究结果可为合理应用土壤调理剂改良滨海盐土、提高水稻产量提供理论依据。

关键词: 土壤调理剂, 滨海盐土, 水稻, 土壤电导率

Abstract:

In the present study, a pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of a self-developed soil conditioner with different application rates (0, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5 g·kg^-1) on soil physiochemical properties and rice grain yield in coastal saline soil. It was shown that the values of soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and content of available K were significantly (P<0.05) decreased with application of soil conditioner compared with the control treatment without application of soil conditioner, while the contents of soil organic matter, total N, alkaline available N, available P, and N, P, K in rice straw and grains, and rice height, biomass and yield were significantly (P<0.05) increased. The effective panicles, grain number per panicle, plant height, 1 000-grain weight, biomass and yield of rice were significantly (P<0.01) negatively correlated with soil pH and EC, and were significantly (P<0.05) positively correlated with soil organic matter, total N, available N and available P. But, there was no significant correlation found within soil available K and the effective panicles, grain number per panicle, plant height, 1 000-grain weight, biomass and yield of rice. Among all the application rates, application of 10.0 g·kg^-1 soil conditioner exhibited the best performance. The results of this study could provide both theoretical and technical basis for the rational application of soil conditioner to improve coastal saline soil and increase rice yield.

Key words: soil conditioner, coastal saline soil, rice, soil electrical conductivity

中图分类号:

S156.4

朱芸, 郭彬, 林义成, 傅庆林, 刘琛, 李凝玉, 李华. 新型矿基土壤调理剂对滨海盐土理化性状和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 885-892.

ZHU Yun, GUO Bin, LIN Yicheng, FU Qinglin, LIU Chen, LI Ningyu, LI Hua. Effects of self-developed soil conditioner on soil physiochemical properties and rice yield in coastal saline soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 885-892.

图/表 4

参考文献 30

[1]	杨劲松. 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):837-845.
	YANG J S. Development and prospect of the research on salt-affected soils in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008,45(5):837-845.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	赵永敢, 李玉义, 胡小龙, 等. 地膜覆盖结合秸秆深埋对土壤水盐动态影响的微区试验[J]. 土壤学报, 2013,50(6):1129-1137.
	ZHAO Y G, LI Y Y, HU X L, et al. Effects of plastic mulching and deep burial of straw on dynamics of soil water and salt in micro-plot field cultivation[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2013,50(6):1129-1137.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王金芬, 刘雪梅, 王希英. 土壤盐碱改良剂改良滨海盐渍土的效果研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006,34(17):4353-4354.
	WANG J F, LIU X M, WANG X Y. Effect of the saline soil restoration material on soil amendment[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006,34(17):4353-4354.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	耿泽铭. 施用生物有机肥对盐渍土改良效果及玉米产量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2013.
	GENG Z M. Use bio-organic fertilizer on saline soil improvement effect and corn yield[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	王玥, 李晓龙, 杨涛. 河套灌区盐碱化耕地改良技术模式[J]. 现代农业, 2019(2):29.
	WANG Y, LI X L, YANG T. Technical model of saline alkali cultivated land improvement in Hetao irrigation area[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2019(2):29.(in Chinese)
[6]	郭永忠, 景春梅, 王峰, 等. BGA土壤调理剂对土壤结构及养分的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013,22(12):87-90.
	GUO Y Z, JING C M, WANG F, et al. Effect of BGA soil conditioner on soil structure and nutrient[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2013,22(12):87-90.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	姜增明, 费云鹏, 陈佳, 等. 土壤调理剂在盐碱地改良中的作用[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(20):174-177.
	JIANG Z M, FEI Y P, CHEN J, et al. Effect of soil conditioners on modifying saline-alkali soil[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2014(20):174-177.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	于晓东, 郭新送, 洪丕征, 等. 不同配方腐植酸型土壤调理剂对滨海盐碱地土壤性质及小麦产量的影响[J]. 腐植酸, 2019(5):52-57.
	YU X D, GUO X S, HONG P Z, et al. Effects of different humic acid soil conditioners on wheat yield and main properties of coastal alkali-saline soil[J]. Humic Acid, 2019(5):52-57.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	马林, 师伟杰, 丁亮, 等. 土壤调理剂对盐化潮土理化性状及玉米产量的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2017,6(3):180-184.
	MA L, SHI W J, DING L, et al. Effects of soil conditioner on salinized fluvo-aquic soil physo-chemical properties and maize yield[J]. Soils and Crops, 2017,6(3):180-184.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	倪海峰, 朱尤东, 刘树堂, 等. 保水剂及有机酸土壤调理剂对盐碱地的改良效果及小麦产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020,52(4):121-125.
	NI H F, ZHU Y D, LIU S T, et al. Effects of water retention agent and organic acid soil conditioner on saline-alkali soil improvement and wheat yield[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020,52(4):121-125.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	ZHANG J S, JIANG X L, MIAO Q, et al. Combining mineral amendments improves wheat yield and soil properties in a coastal saline area[J]. Agronomy, 2019,9(2):48. DOI URL
[12]	ZHANG T, WANG T, LIU K, et al. Effects of different amendments for the reclamation of coastal saline soil on soil nutrient dynamics and electrical conductivity responses[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2015,159:115-122. DOI URL
[13]	姜晶晶, 刘庆花, 李俊良, 等. 钙肥型土壤调理剂在设施番茄生产中的应用[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2009(10):63-67.
	JIANG J J, LIU Q H, LI J L, et al. Application of calcium soil amendment in greenhouse tomato production[J]. China Vegetables, 2009(10):63-67.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	史蛟华, 陈宽, 王晓丽, 等. 土壤调理剂对盐碱地葡萄K⁺、Na⁺转运的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,38(5):567-573.
	SHI J H, CHEN K, WANG X L, et al. Effect of soil conditioner on K⁺ and Na⁺ transport of saline-alkali grape fields[J]. Journal of Shihezi University(Natural Science), 2020,38(5):567-573. (in Chinese)
[15]	朱福军, 吴钦泉, 谷端银, 等. 不同腐殖酸配施钙、镁的土壤调理剂对盐碱土淋洗的影响[J]. 化肥工业, 2016,43(5):20-26.
	ZHU F J, WU Q Q, GU D Y, et al. Effects of different humic acid soil conditioners containing Ca and Mg on saline alkali soil leaching[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2016,43(5):20-26.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	张发胜, 俄胜哲, 姚佳璇, 等. 石膏基盐碱土调理剂对河西饲料玉米生物产量及土壤的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2020(9):10-13.
	ZHANG F S, E S Z, YAO J X, et al. Application of gypsum-based saline-alkali soil conditioner to plant feed corn in Hexi area[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(9):10-13.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	王鼎, 李跃进, 李青春, 等. 硅酸钙型盐碱土复合调理剂配方筛选研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,48(11):123-132.
	WANG D, LI Y J, LI Q C, et al. Formula selection of calcium silicate compound conditioner for saline-alkali soil[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2020,48(11):123-132.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	汤俊芳, 李志洪, 徐明海. 不同改良物质对苏打盐碱土的改良效果[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2020,42(2):161-166.
	TANG J F, LI Z H, XU M H. Improvement effects of different conditioners on soda saline soil[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2020,42(2):161-166.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	曾华, 李旭, 付立东, 等. “施地佳”土壤调理剂在滨海盐碱地水稻上的应用效果[J]. 北方水稻, 2017,47(1):25-28.
	ZENG H, LI X, FU L D, et al. Applied effect of soil conditioner of Shidijia on the rice cropping region of saline and alkaline land in coastal[J]. North Rice, 2017,47(1):25-28.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	仲秀珍. 应用天然沸石矿粉改良盐碱土的研究[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 1985,7(2):85-91.
	ZHONG X Z. Improving saline alkali soil with natural zeolite powder[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 1985,7(2):85-91.(in Chinese)
[21]	王宇, 韩兴, 赵兰坡, 等. 硫酸铝对苏打盐碱土化学性质及水稻产量的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2006,28(6):652-655.
	WANG Y, HAN X, ZHAO L P, et al. Effect of aluminum sulfate on chemical characteristics of soda alkali-saline soil and rice yield[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2006,28(6):652-655.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	陈裕兴, 张青, 王煌平, 等. 土壤调理剂在水稻上的施用效果研究[J]. 福建农业科技, 2013(11):43-45.
	CHEN Y X, ZHANG Q, WANG H P, et al. Studying on the effects of soil conditioner applying on rice[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013(11):43-45.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	杨振超, 陈双臣, 邹志荣. 土壤调理剂对温室西葫芦产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(2):164-166.
	YANG Z C, CHEN S C, ZOU Z R. Effects of soil power on the yield and quality of squash in greenhouse[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005,21(2):164-166.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	FU Q L, LIU C, DING N F, et al. Soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in a reclaimed coastal soil chronosequence under rice-barley cropping[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2012,12(7):1134-1144. DOI URL
[25]	LIU C, XU J M, DING N F, et al. The effect of long-term reclamation on enzyme activities and microbial community structure of saline soil at Shangyu, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013,69(1):151-159. DOI URL
[26]	刘洁, 胡冬华. 水稻基础产量与土壤速效养分含量的相关性[J]. 作物研究, 2015,29(3):277-280.
	LIU J, HU D H. Correlation of rice yield and soil available nutrients contents[J]. Crop Research, 2015,29(3):277-280.(in Chinese)
[27]	高辉, 张洪程, 戴其根, 等. 不同土种土壤氮素等养分与水稻基础产量的关系[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2007,28(1):49-53.
	GAO H, ZHANG H C, DAI Q G, et al. Relations between soil nitrogen and other nutrients and rice basal yields in different soil local types[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2007,28(1):49-53.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	MA J F, YAMAMOTO R, NEVINS D J, et al. Al binding in the epidermis cell wall inhibits cell elongation of okra hypocotyl[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1999,40(5):549-556. DOI URL
[29]	TABUCHI A, MATSUMOTO H. Changes in cell-wall properties of wheat (Triticum aestivum) roots during aluminum-induced growth inhibition[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2001,112(3):353-358. DOI URL
[30]	史吉平, 张夫道, 林葆. 长期定位施肥对土壤中、微量营养元素的影响[J]. 土壤肥料, 1999(1):3-6.
	SHI J P, ZHANG F D, LIN B. Effect of long-term fertilization on soil medium-and micro-elements[J]. Soils and Fertilizers, 1999(1):3-6. (in Chinese)

处理 Treatment	秸秆Straw			籽粒Grain
处理 Treatment	N	P	K	N	P	K
CK-1	5.68±0.14 e	7.93 ±0.31 d	6.50±0.80 d	14.71±0.20 e	36.21±0.68 d	0.84±0.05 e
T1	6.81±0.14 c	9.69 ±0.27 c	8.20±0.50 c	15.69±0.10 d	42.35±0.41 c	0.90±0.06 d
T2	7.83±0.14 b	11.22±0.41 a	8.41±0.60 b	18.33±0.20 b	47.28±0.68 b	1.00±0.06 b
T3	8.51±0.19 a	11.87±0.31 a	8.85±0.40 a	19.57±0.30 a	51.12±0.54 a	1.13±0.04 a
T4	6.66±0.09 d	10.56±0.41 b	8.27±0.50 c	17.31±0.50 c	48.49±0.27 b	0.93±0.08 c

处理 Treatment	秸秆Straw			籽粒Grain
处理 Treatment	N	P	K	N	P	K
CK-1	5.68±0.14 e	7.93 ±0.31 d	6.50±0.80 d	14.71±0.20 e	36.21±0.68 d	0.84±0.05 e
T1	6.81±0.14 c	9.69 ±0.27 c	8.20±0.50 c	15.69±0.10 d	42.35±0.41 c	0.90±0.06 d
T2	7.83±0.14 b	11.22±0.41 a	8.41±0.60 b	18.33±0.20 b	47.28±0.68 b	1.00±0.06 b
T3	8.51±0.19 a	11.87±0.31 a	8.85±0.40 a	19.57±0.30 a	51.12±0.54 a	1.13±0.04 a
T4	6.66±0.09 d	10.56±0.41 b	8.27±0.50 c	17.31±0.50 c	48.49±0.27 b	0.93±0.08 c

处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicles	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	株高 Plant height/cm	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	每盆生物量 Biomass per pot/g	每盆产量 Yield per pot/g
CK-1	25±1 b	152±8 c	94.2±1.1 c	24.5±1.4 c	506.8±13.2 d	230.7±3.2 e
T1	25±1 b	162±11 bc	97.3±1.1 b	26.9±1.6 c	545.9±14.1 c	251.7±6.2 d
T2	26±1 a	167±10 ab	97.8±1.6 b	29.6±1.3 b	573.2±12.3 b	268.4±3.1 b
T3	27±1 a	179±9 a	102.5±3.0 a	32.3±1.1 a	601.5±13.4 a	284.8±4.1 a
T4	25±1 b	169±9 ab	100.3±2.0 a	30.6±1.5 ab	586.3±11.2 b	258.3±5.1 c

处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicles	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	株高 Plant height/cm	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	每盆生物量 Biomass per pot/g	每盆产量 Yield per pot/g
CK-1	25±1 b	152±8 c	94.2±1.1 c	24.5±1.4 c	506.8±13.2 d	230.7±3.2 e
T1	25±1 b	162±11 bc	97.3±1.1 b	26.9±1.6 c	545.9±14.1 c	251.7±6.2 d
T2	26±1 a	167±10 ab	97.8±1.6 b	29.6±1.3 b	573.2±12.3 b	268.4±3.1 b
T3	27±1 a	179±9 a	102.5±3.0 a	32.3±1.1 a	601.5±13.4 a	284.8±4.1 a
T4	25±1 b	169±9 ab	100.3±2.0 a	30.6±1.5 ab	586.3±11.2 b	258.3±5.1 c

指标Index	pH	EC	SOM	TN	AN	AP	AK
有效穗数Effective panicles	-0.564^**	-0.821^**	0.809^**	0.627^*	0.764^**	0.778^**	0.191
每穗粒数Grain number per panicle	-0.888^**	-0.801^**	0.718^**	0.841^**	0.877^**	0.864^**	-0.376
株高Plant height	-0.850^**	-0.830^**	0.584^*	0.901^**	0.730^**	0.815^**	-0.004
千粒重1 000-grain weight	-0.933^**	-0.908^**	0.788^**	0.939^**	0.934^**	0.944^**	-0.236
生物量Biomass	-0.964^**	-0.882^**	0.700^**	0.981^**	0.875^**	0.923^**	-0.109
产量Yield	-0.864^**	-0.939^**	0.910^**	0.863^**	0.968^**	0.964^**	-0.026

新型矿基土壤调理剂对滨海盐土理化性状和水稻产量的影响

Effects of self-developed soil conditioner on soil physiochemical properties and rice yield in coastal saline soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴佩聪, 张鹏, 单颖, 邹刚华, 丁哲利, 朱治强, 赵凤亮. 秸秆炭化还田对热带土壤-水稻体系氨挥发的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 678-687.
[2]	厉宝仙, 王保君, 怀燕, 沈亚强, 张红梅, 程旺大. 水稻-红鳌螯虾共作对稻田土壤养分、碳库与稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 688-696.
[3]	刘俊, 朱德泉, 于从羊, 薛康, 张顺, 廖娟. 舀勺型孔轮式水稻精量排种器设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 739-752.
[4]	陈丹, 汤翠凤, 董超, 甘树仙, 李俊, 阿新祥, 张斐斐, 杨雅云, 牛赛赛, 戴陆园. 云南软米地方品种籽粒淀粉品质特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 203-214.
[5]	邹文雄, 吴伟, 关亚静, 曹栋栋, 卞晓波, 施德云, 丁丽玲. 水稻种子休眠调控技术研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 369-379.
[6]	谷建诚, 郭彬, 林义成, 傅庆林, 刘琛, 丁能飞, 李华, 李凝玉. 根表铁膜对水稻镉吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 963-970.
[7]	夏文建, 秦文婧, 刘佳, 陈晓芬, 张丽芳, 曹卫东, 徐昌旭, 陈静蕊. 长期绿肥利用下红壤性水稻土有机碳和可溶性有机碳的垂直分布特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 878-885.
[8]	邵文奇, 钟平, 董玉兵, 孙春梅, 纪力, 庄春, 陈川, 章安康. 托盘育苗中光温资源差异及其对水稻秧苗素质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 191-199.
[9]	杨红云, 罗建军, 孙爱珍, 万颖, 易文龙. 基于图像特征的水稻叶片全氮含量估测模型研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2232-2243.
[10]	张馨月, 李友发, 刘江宁, 富昊伟. 利用广亲和基因S5-n的功能标记鉴定特殊配组类型杂交种纯度研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 15-19.
[11]	邴静静, 高红梅. 基于SWOT分析的天津市优质稻米产业发展研究--以"小站稻"为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1217-1223.
[12]	潘俊峰, 钟旭华, 黄农荣, 刘彦卓, 田卡, 梁开明, 彭碧琳, 傅友强, 胡香玉. 不同栽培模式对华南双季晚稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 857-868.
[13]	何海燕, 柴荣耀, 邱海萍, 毛雪琴, 王艳丽, 孙国仓. 五个抗稻瘟病基因在浙江省水稻品种中的分布和抗性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 922-929.
[14]	索晨, 罗小三, 赵朕, 孙雪, 张丹, 陈燕. 大气降尘污染对典型农作物生长发育及重金属含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 938-945.
[15]	张建桃, 曾家骏, 尹选春, 兰玉彬, 文晟, 林耿纯. 液滴体积对水稻叶面接触角的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 986-995.