浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 2574-2582.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240958
刘亚亚1(
), 王勤礼1,2,*(
), 颉建明1, 邓浩亮2, 金永生3, 熊鹰3, 刘海娜2
收稿日期:2024-11-08
出版日期:2025-12-25
发布日期:2026-01-09
作者简介:*王勤礼,E-mail:Wangqinli66@163.com通讯作者:
王勤礼
基金资助:
LIU Yaya1(
), WANG Qinli1,2,*(
), XIE Jianming1, DENG Haoliang2, JIN Yongsheng3, XIONG Ying3, LIU Haina2
Received:2024-11-08
Online:2025-12-25
Published:2026-01-09
Contact:
WANG Qinli
摘要: 为探究不同用量(CK,0;T1,1 800 kg·hm-2;T2,2 400 kg·hm-2;T3,3 000 kg·hm-2;T4,3 600 kg·hm-2)的凹凸棒石基调理剂在沙化土壤改良中的作用,明确其在朝天椒种植中的适宜用量,以甘肃省张掖市临泽县沙化土壤为研究对象,开展大田试验。结果表明,施用适宜用量的凹凸棒石基调理剂能显著(p<0.05)提高土壤的有机质、碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾含量,降低土壤容重和水溶性盐含量,增加土壤的总孔隙度和水溶性大团聚体(粒径>0.25 mm)质量分数,提高朝天椒的株高、产量及果实中的维生素C(VC)含量。基于对土壤理化性状和朝天椒生长、品质、产量指标的综合评价,T3处理的效果最好。该处理下,土壤有机质、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾含量分别较CK显著增加140.6%、146.0%、371.6%、224.4%,土壤总孔隙度显著提高9.00百分点,朝天椒株高显著增加143.8%,产量显著提高45.0%,果实VC含量显著提高24.6%,既能有效改良沙化土壤,又能提高朝天椒的产量与质量,具有较大的应用潜力。
中图分类号:
刘亚亚, 王勤礼, 颉建明, 邓浩亮, 金永生, 熊鹰, 刘海娜. 凹凸棒石基调理剂用量对沙化土壤改良及朝天椒生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(12): 2574-2582.
LIU Yaya, WANG Qinli, XIE Jianming, DENG Haoliang, JIN Yongsheng, XIONG Ying, LIU Haina. Effects of application rate of attapulgite-based conditioner on improvement of desertified soil and growth of Capsicum annuum var. conoides[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(12): 2574-2582.
图1 不同处理对土壤容重的影响 柱上无相同字母的表示差异显著(p<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Impact of treatments on soil bulk density Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at p<0.05. The same as below.
| 处理 Treatment | 各粒级团聚体的质量分数 Mass fraction of aggregates with varied particle sizes/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤0.25 mm | >0.25~0.50 mm | >0.50 mm | |
| CK | 17.92±1.51 a | 48.55±0.76 b | 33.53±3.67 a |
| T1 | 15.12±0.50 b | 49.38±1.54 ab | 35.47±4.17 a |
| T2 | 13.36±1.13 c | 50.38±1.95 ab | 36.26±2.08 a |
| T3 | 11.26±0.27 d | 51.87±0.55 a | 36.87±2.79 a |
| T4 | 12.92±0.42 c | 50.30±1.87 ab | 36.78±4.35 a |
表1 不同处理对土壤各级团聚体质量分数的影响
Table 1 Impact of treatments on mass fraction of soil aggregates
| 处理 Treatment | 各粒级团聚体的质量分数 Mass fraction of aggregates with varied particle sizes/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤0.25 mm | >0.25~0.50 mm | >0.50 mm | |
| CK | 17.92±1.51 a | 48.55±0.76 b | 33.53±3.67 a |
| T1 | 15.12±0.50 b | 49.38±1.54 ab | 35.47±4.17 a |
| T2 | 13.36±1.13 c | 50.38±1.95 ab | 36.26±2.08 a |
| T3 | 11.26±0.27 d | 51.87±0.55 a | 36.87±2.79 a |
| T4 | 12.92±0.42 c | 50.30±1.87 ab | 36.78±4.35 a |
| 处理 Treatment | ωAN | ωAP | ωAK |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.50±0.94 b | 15.93±2.65 c | 74.38±6.74 c |
| T1 | 4.99±1.35 ab | 35.31±2.02 b | 131.83±5.64 b |
| T2 | 5.65±1.07 a | 55.52±3.19 a | 154.99±15.00 b |
| T3 | 6.15±1.18 a | 75.12±2.94 a | 241.28±14.03 a |
| T4 | 5.87±1.70 a | 54.68±5.66 a | 132.86±14.94 b |
表2 不同处理对土壤碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾含量的影响
Table 2 Impact of treatments on content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium in soil mg·kg-1
| 处理 Treatment | ωAN | ωAP | ωAK |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.50±0.94 b | 15.93±2.65 c | 74.38±6.74 c |
| T1 | 4.99±1.35 ab | 35.31±2.02 b | 131.83±5.64 b |
| T2 | 5.65±1.07 a | 55.52±3.19 a | 154.99±15.00 b |
| T3 | 6.15±1.18 a | 75.12±2.94 a | 241.28±14.03 a |
| T4 | 5.87±1.70 a | 54.68±5.66 a | 132.86±14.94 b |
| 处理 Treatment | 分枝数 Branch number | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 11.30±2.05 a | 53.73±9.68 c | 11.95±2.19 a |
| T1 | 14.50±4.44 a | 50.59±4.91 c | 12.86±1.80 a |
| T2 | 12.50±2.60 a | 113.00±11.53 ab | 11.95±2.19 a |
| T3 | 13.30±2.50 a | 131.00±18.32 a | 15.39±2.72 a |
| T4 | 10.90±0.80 a | 105.00±1.00 b | 13.45±1.32 a |
表3 不同处理对作物朝天椒分枝数、株高、茎粗的影响
Table 3 Impact of treatments on branch number, plant height and stem diameter of pod pepper
| 处理 Treatment | 分枝数 Branch number | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 11.30±2.05 a | 53.73±9.68 c | 11.95±2.19 a |
| T1 | 14.50±4.44 a | 50.59±4.91 c | 12.86±1.80 a |
| T2 | 12.50±2.60 a | 113.00±11.53 ab | 11.95±2.19 a |
| T3 | 13.30±2.50 a | 131.00±18.32 a | 15.39±2.72 a |
| T4 | 10.90±0.80 a | 105.00±1.00 b | 13.45±1.32 a |
| 处理 Treatment | 维生素C含量 Vitamin C content/ (mg·kg-1) | 辣椒红素 Capsanthin content/ (mg·kg-1) | 单株红果数 Quantity of red chilis per plant | 单株青果数 Quantity of green chilis per plant | 单株日灼果数 Quantity of sunburn chilis per plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 190.0±30.0 b | 21.9±1.4 a | 56±10 b | 9±4 a | 16±1 a |
| T1 | 225.0±15.0 a | 18.5±1.6 a | 97±18 a | 18±13 a | 12±1 b |
| T2 | 230.0±10.0 a | 15.0±0.5 a | 92±2 a | 15±7 a | 12±2 b |
| T3 | 236.7±5.8 a | 27.4±2.5 a | 86±3 a | 9±3 a | 12±3 b |
| T4 | 240.0±10.0 a | 20.3±2.7 a | 93±11 a | 11±1 a | 10±1 b |
表4 不同处理对朝天椒品质与商品性的影响
Table 4 Impact of treatments on quality and commodity traits of pod pepper
| 处理 Treatment | 维生素C含量 Vitamin C content/ (mg·kg-1) | 辣椒红素 Capsanthin content/ (mg·kg-1) | 单株红果数 Quantity of red chilis per plant | 单株青果数 Quantity of green chilis per plant | 单株日灼果数 Quantity of sunburn chilis per plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 190.0±30.0 b | 21.9±1.4 a | 56±10 b | 9±4 a | 16±1 a |
| T1 | 225.0±15.0 a | 18.5±1.6 a | 97±18 a | 18±13 a | 12±1 b |
| T2 | 230.0±10.0 a | 15.0±0.5 a | 92±2 a | 15±7 a | 12±2 b |
| T3 | 236.7±5.8 a | 27.4±2.5 a | 86±3 a | 9±3 a | 12±3 b |
| T4 | 240.0±10.0 a | 20.3±2.7 a | 93±11 a | 11±1 a | 10±1 b |
| 处理 Treatment | 单株果数 Fruit number per plant | 单果重 Single fruit weight/g | 果肉厚度 Flesh thickness/mm | 果粗 Fruit diameter/mm | 果长 Fruit length/mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 77.00±13.32 b | 0.90±0.04 a | 0.22±0.03 a | 10.53±0.59 a | 57.00±2.53 a |
| T1 | 105.00±1.00 ab | 1.00±1.00 a | 0.28±0.07 a | 11.17±1.58 a | 54.10±0.75 a |
| T2 | 128.00±18.85 a | 1.21±0.14 a | 0.28±0.06 a | 11.61±1.43 a | 56.11±1.03 a |
| T3 | 131.00±30.50 a | 0.99±0.24 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 12.04±2.83 a | 57.52±5.60 a |
| T4 | 113.00±11.53 a | 0.97±0.43 a | 0.24±0.05 a | 11.91±1.89 a | 53.28±5.90 a |
表5 不同处理对朝天椒产量因子的影响
Table 5 Impact of treatments on yield factors of pod pepper
| 处理 Treatment | 单株果数 Fruit number per plant | 单果重 Single fruit weight/g | 果肉厚度 Flesh thickness/mm | 果粗 Fruit diameter/mm | 果长 Fruit length/mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 77.00±13.32 b | 0.90±0.04 a | 0.22±0.03 a | 10.53±0.59 a | 57.00±2.53 a |
| T1 | 105.00±1.00 ab | 1.00±1.00 a | 0.28±0.07 a | 11.17±1.58 a | 54.10±0.75 a |
| T2 | 128.00±18.85 a | 1.21±0.14 a | 0.28±0.06 a | 11.61±1.43 a | 56.11±1.03 a |
| T3 | 131.00±30.50 a | 0.99±0.24 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 12.04±2.83 a | 57.52±5.60 a |
| T4 | 113.00±11.53 a | 0.97±0.43 a | 0.24±0.05 a | 11.91±1.89 a | 53.28±5.90 a |
| [1] | 魏怀东, 李亚, 张勃, 等. 甘肃河西地区荒漠化土地光谱特征研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(11): 3508-3513. |
| WEI H D, LI Y, ZHANG B, et al. Spectral characteristics of desertification land in Gansu Hexi Corridor[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2019, 39(11): 3508-3513. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 王红萍. 火山岩与功能菌剂配施对沙化土壤团聚体和养分的改良效应[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023. |
| WANG H P. Improvement effect of volcanic rock and functional fungicide on desertification soil aggregates and nutrients[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 张娜, 李宇洁, 王剑虹, 等. 浅谈生物技术在沙化土壤修复中的应用[J]. 兰州职业技术学院学报, 2023, 39(2): 71-73. |
| ZHANG N, LI Y J, WANG J H, et al. Application of biotechnology in the remediation of sandy soil[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Vocational Technical College, 2023, 39(2): 71-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 廉晓娟, 郭锐, 李明悦, 等. 调理剂对设施土壤物理性状及蔬菜产量品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(19): 4702-4704. |
| LIAN X J, GUO R, LI M Y, et al. Effects of soil conditioners on soil physical properties and yield and quality of vegetable in greenhouse[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 54(19): 4702-4704. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 杨振超, 陈双臣, 邹志荣. 土壤调理剂对温室西葫芦产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(2): 164-166. |
| YANG Z C, CHEN S C, ZOU Z R. Effects of soil power on the yield and quality of squash in greenhouse[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(2): 164-166. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 王钰轩, 俄胜哲, 袁金华, 等. 凹凸棒石在农业及环境领域的研究现状及进展[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2021, 36(4): 42-48. |
| WANG Y X, E S Z, YUAN J H, et al. Research status and progress of attapulgite in agriculture and environment fields[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2021, 36(4): 42-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 蔺海明, 邱黛玉. 坡缕石在生态修复及绿色农业中应用研究进展[J]. 甘肃农业, 2007(9): 61-63. |
| LIN H M, QIU D Y. Research progress on the application of hectonite in ecological restoration and green agriculture[J]. Gansu Agriculture, 2007(9): 61-63. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | 任慧, 邵洋, 李艳安, 等. 一种菌糠腐植酸/凹凸棒石缓释肥的制备及性能研究[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2021, 37(12): 9-13. |
| REN H, SHAO Y, LI Y A, et al. Preparation and performance of a slow-release fertilizer based on humic acid extracted from fermented mushroom residue and attapulgite clay[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2021, 37(12): 9-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 凌慧诗, 王志红, 刘立凡, 等. 改性凹凸棒土的优化定向制备及对腐殖酸的吸附效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(6): 2921-2926. |
| LING H S, WANG Z H, LIU L F, et al. Optimized preparation of directional modified attapulgite and its application to absorb humic acid[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(6): 2921-2926. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | VRDOLJAK G, SPOSITO G. Soil aggregate hierarchy in a Brazilian oxisol[J]. Developments in Soil Science, 2002, 28: 197-217. |
| [11] | 刘恋. 有机、无机土壤调理剂配施对沙化潮土的改良效果研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2014. |
| LIU L. Utilization of the organic and inorganic soil amendment for the improvement on sandy fluvo-aquic soil[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 宋佳珅, 张晓丽, 孔凡磊, 等. 生物质调理剂对川西北高寒草地沙化土壤养分和微生物群落特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2217-2226. |
| SONG J S, ZHANG X L, KONG F L, et al. Effects of biomass conditioner on soil nutrient and microbial community characteristics of alpine desertified grassland in northwest Sichuan, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(6): 2217-2226. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 王占海, 王环, 马秀芳, 等. 盐碱地中增施生物有机肥对玉米产量及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2022(9): 21-23. |
| WANG Z H, WANG H, MA X F, et al. Effects of increased application of biological organic fertilizer on corn yield and soil physical and chemical properties in saline-alkaline land[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2022(9): 21-23. (in Chinese) | |
| [14] | 王秀颖, 高晓飞, 刘和平, 等. 土壤水稳性大团聚体测定方法综述[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(3): 106-113. |
| WANG X Y, GAO X F, LIU H P, et al. Review of analytical methods for aggregate size distribution and water-stability of soil macro-aggregates[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(3): 106-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 刘丽丽, 马会芳, 占国艳, 等. 重量法测定土壤水溶性盐总量的优化[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 2023, 13(6): 661-670. |
| LIU L L, MA H F, ZHAN G Y, et al. Optimization of water-soluble salt in soil by gravimetric method[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 13(6): 661-670. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 江胜国. 国内土壤容重测定方法综述[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(S2): 82-86. |
| JIANG S G. Review on determination method for soil bulk density in China[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 58(S2): 82-86. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | 汪攀峰, 丁启朔, 丁为民, 等. 一种土壤孔隙率(比)的测定方法[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2009, 26(7): 50-51. |
| WANG P F, DING Q S, DING W M, et al. A measurement method of soil porosity[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2009, 26(7): 50-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 任朝辉, 田旭芳, 廖卫琴, 等. 不同朝天椒种质资源VC含量的测定[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(10): 209. |
| REN C H, TIAN X F, LIAO W Q, et al. Determination of VC content in different pod pepper germplasm resources[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(10): 209. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 李美粉. 辣椒中红色素和辣椒素的分离与精制工艺研究[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2005. |
| LI M F. Extraction and purification of capsanthin & capsaicin from hot red peppers[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2005. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | GULŹ M, CELIKŹ E, AYDINŹ N, et al. A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 46: 60-89. |
| [21] | 高东, 何霞红. 生物多样性与生态系统稳定性研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(12): 2507-2513. |
| GAO D, HE X H. Research advances on biodiversity and ecosystem stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29(12): 2507-2513. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 王晓洋, 陈效民, 李孝良, 等. 不同改良剂与石膏配施对滨海盐渍土的改良效果研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012, 32(3): 128-132. |
| WANG X Y, CHEN X M, LI X L, et al. Improvement effects of combined application of different amendments and gypsum on a coastal saline soil[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 32(3): 128-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 袁惠君, 刘左军, 张旭霞, 等. 凹凸棒石粘土对灌淤土养分含量及小麦生长的影响[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2008, 34(6): 82-84. |
| YUAN H J, LIU Z J, ZHANG X X, et al. Effects of attapulgite clay on nutrient content in irrigation-silted soil and wheat growth[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2008, 34(6): 82-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 刘左军, 陈正宏, 袁惠君, 等. 凹凸棒石粘土对土壤团粒结构及小麦生长的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(1): 142-144. |
| LIU Z J, CHEN Z H, YUAN H J, et al. Effects of attapulgite clay on soil aggregate and wheat growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(1): 142-144. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 王越. 小麦秸秆/凹土复合保水剂的研制及其在黄瓜基质栽培中的应用[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2021. |
| WANG Y. Preparation of wheat straw/attapulgite composite super absorbent polymer and its application in cucumber substrate cultivation[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 刘金菊, 吴军霞, 魏英, 等. 凹凸棒保水剂对马铃薯田土壤理化性质影响研究[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2021, 52(7): 37-41. |
| LIU J J, WU J X, WEI Y, et al. Effects of attapulgite water-retaining agent on soil physical and chemical properties of potato[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 52(7): 37-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 朱晓琴, 孙涛, 张庆琛, 等. 食用菌菌糠在农业种植中的再利用现状[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(16): 170-175. |
| ZHU X Q, SUN T, ZHANG Q C, et al. Reutilization progress of spent mushroom substrates in agriculture[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021(16): 170-175. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 刘亚龙, 王萍, 汪景宽. 土壤团聚体的形成和稳定机制: 研究进展与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(3): 627-643. |
| LIU Y L, WANG P, WANG J K. Formation and stability mechanism of soil aggregates: progress and prospect[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 60(3): 627-643. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 杨婷, 吴军虎. 凹凸棒土对土壤团粒结构及水力参数的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(6): 46-51. |
| YANG T, WU J H. Effect of attapulgite to soil aggregate structure and hydraulic parameters[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(6): 46-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 王亚菲, 石岩. 凹凸棒石在农业生产上应用进展[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2016, 36(2): 69-72. |
| WANG Y F, SHI Y. The application progress of attapulgite in agricultural production[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2016, 36(2): 69-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 宋计平, 殷和勤, 杨延杰, 等. 不同土壤调理剂对黄瓜生长、品质及产量的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(23): 19-23. |
| SONG J P, YIN H Q, YANG Y J, et al. Effects of different soil conditioners on growth, yield and quality of cucumber[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(23): 19-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | 李国荣, 杨建伟, 和兰香, 等. 复混肥配施土壤调理剂对龙椒农艺性状与土壤养分的影响[J]. 云南化工, 2024, 51(3): 65-69. |
| LI G R, YANG J W, HE L X, et al. The influence of agronomic traits and soil nutrient traits[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2024, 51(3): 65-69. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [33] | 沈彦辉, 胡璋健, 赵冬梅, 等. 矿物型土壤调理剂用量对设施黄瓜生长、品质及土壤性状的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(8): 33-41. |
| SHEN Y H, HU Z J, ZHAO D M, et al. Effects of different rates of mineral soil conditioner on plant growth, quality and soil property of greenhouse cucumber[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(8): 33-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 范琳娟, 吴彩云, 徐雪亮, 刘子荣, 姚健, 康宏波, 胡平华, 姚英娟. 两种杀线虫剂处理对山药土壤线虫群落和理化性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1102-1112. |
| [2] | 高虎, 穆晓国, 李海俊, 高富成, 张莹, 李建设, 叶林. 粉垄耕作对坝地土壤特性及甘蓝产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1113-1123. |
| [3] | 侯栋, 李亚莉, 岳宏忠, 张东琴, 姚拓, 黄书超, 杨海兴. 微生物菌肥替代部分化肥对花椰菜产量、品质及土壤微生物的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 589-599. |
| [4] | 杨乐, 李文杨, 骆建莉, 郑伟, 张毕阳, 王震, 阎腾飞. 地膜覆盖和自然生草对桃园土壤养分、pH及水热的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2719-2726. |
| [5] | 魏茜雅, 梁腊梅, 林欣琪, 秦中维, 李映志. 褪黑素种子引发处理对干旱胁迫下朝天椒生长与生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2378-2388. |
| [6] | 王薇薇, 梅燚, 吴永成, 万红建, 陈长军, 郑青松, 郑佳秋. 玉米芯生物炭对辣椒连作土壤性质和辣椒生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 156-163. |
| [7] | 高志远, 杨淑娜, 王朝丽, 王智豪, 奚昕琰, 何娟, 贾惠娟. 不同熏蒸方式对连作桃园土壤的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2251-2258. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||