农地确权对农业碳排放效率的影响——基于30个省级行政区的面板数据

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240110

浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 712-725.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240110

农地确权对农业碳排放效率的影响——基于30个省级行政区的面板数据

施晓燕¹(), 王音璠², 张婧¹, 王鹏³

1.甘肃农业大学理学院,甘肃兰州 730070
2.香港中文大学地理与资源管理学系,香港 999077
3.兰州大学经济学院,甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2024-01-25 出版日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-04-02
作者简介:施晓燕(1982—),女,甘肃兰州人,博士,讲师,研究方向为农业经济理论与政策。E-mail: shixy@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD161);甘肃省自然科学基金(22JR5RA855);甘肃省高等学校创新基金(2022B-104)

Impact of rural land empowerment on carbon emission efficiency in agriculture: a panel data study based on 30 province-level administrative regions across China

SHI Xiaoyan¹(), WANG Yinfan², ZHANG Jing¹, WANG Peng³

1. College of Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2. Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
3. School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2024-01-25 Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-04-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

绿色低碳发展是农业高质量发展的内在要求。该文采用SSBM模型和全局Malmquist-Luenberger指数测算农业碳排放效率,采用土地承包经营权证书颁发率表征农地确权程度,以2006—2020年我国30个省级行政区的面板数据为样本,运用面板数据回归模型探析农地确权对农业碳排放效率的作用效果与影响机制,考察农地流转对农地确权与农业碳排放效率关系的调节作用,并运用变系数面板数据回归模型检验农地确权对农业碳排放效率影响的异质性。研究发现:1)农地确权能够提高农业碳排放效率,特别是对于农业大省来说,农地确权对其农业碳排放效率的促进作用较强。2)农地确权有助于加快农村劳动力向城市或非农产业转移,有利于提高农地规模化经营水平,促进农业产业结构趋于合理,进而提高农业碳排放效率。3)农地确权对农业碳排放效率的影响受到农地流转市场发展程度的调节作用,伴随着农地流转水平的提高,农地确权对农业碳排放效率的促进作用也更强。据此建议赋予农民清晰的土地产权,加快推进农村土地流转交易市场体系建设,以更好地发挥农地确权在农业低碳可持续发展中的作用。

关键词: 农地确权, 农业低碳转型, 农地流转

Abstract:

Low-carbon and green development is an intrinsic requirement for high-quality development of agriculture. In the present assay, the SSBM model and the global Malmquist-Luenberger index were used to measure the efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions, and the issue rate of land contractual management right certificate was used to characterize the degree of rural land empowerment. Based on the panel data of 30 province-level administrative regions in China from 2006 to 2020, the panel data regression model was used to explore the effect and influencing mechanism of rural land empowerment on agricultural carbon emission efficiency, and the moderating effect of rural land transfer on the relationship between rural land empowerment and agricultural carbon emission efficiency was investigated. The variable coefficient panel data regression model was used to test the heterogeneity of the impact of rural land empowerment on agricultural carbon emission efficiency. The results showed that: 1) rural land empowerment could improve the efficiency of agricultural carbon emission, especially for the major agricultural provinces. 2) Rural land empowerment was conducive to accelerating the transfer of rural labor to urban or non-agricultural industries, improving the level of large-scale farmland management, promoting the rationalization of agricultural industrial structure, and improving the efficiency of agricultural carbon emission. 3) The impact of rural land empowerment on agricultural carbon emission efficiency was moderated by the development degree of rural land transfer market. With the improvement of rural land transfer level, the promotion effect of rural land empowerment on agricultural carbon emission efficiency would be stronger. Accordingly, it is suggested that farmers should be given clear land property right and the construction of a rural land circulation and transaction market system should be accelerated, so as to better play the role of rural land empowerment in the low-carbon and sustainable development of agriculture.

Key words: rural land empowerment, low-carbon transformation of agriculture, rural land transfer

中图分类号:

F325

施晓燕, 王音璠, 张婧, 王鹏. 农地确权对农业碳排放效率的影响——基于30个省级行政区的面板数据[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 712-725.

SHI Xiaoyan, WANG Yinfan, ZHANG Jing, WANG Peng. Impact of rural land empowerment on carbon emission efficiency in agriculture: a panel data study based on 30 province-level administrative regions across China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(3): 712-725.

图/表 7

参考文献 55

[1]	DEININGER K, JIN S Q. Land sales and rental markets in transition: evidence from rural Vietnam[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2008, 70(1): 67-101.
[2]	HOLDEN S T, DEININGER K, GHEBRU H. Tenure insecurity, gender, low-cost land certification and land rental market participation in Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Development Studies, 2011, 47(1): 31-47.
[3]	丁玲, 钟涨宝. 农村土地承包经营权确权对土地流转的影响研究: 来自湖北省土地确权的实证[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2017, 38(3): 452-459.
	DING L, ZHONG Z B. Influences of rural land reconfirmation on rural land circulation: a case study of Hubei Province[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2017, 38(3): 452-459. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	史常亮, 张益. 土地确权与农村劳动力迁移: 来自省级面板数据的证据[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(4): 647-659.
	SHI C L, ZHANG Y. Land certification and rural labor migration in China: evidence from provincial panel data[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(4): 647-659. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	朱建军, 郭霞, 常向阳. 农地流转对土地生产率影响的对比分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2011(4): 78-84.
	ZHU J J, GUO X, CHANG X Y. Comparative analysis of the influence of farmland circulation on land productivity[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2011(4): 78-84. (in Chinese)
[6]	陈飞, 刘宣宣. 土地确权、要素偏向性技术变革与产业结构转型[J]. 统计研究, 2021, 38(10): 76-89.
	CHEN F, LIU X X. Land ownership confirmation, factor-biased technological change and industrial structural transformation[J]. Statistical Research, 2021, 38(10): 76-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	张先贵. 集体土地所有权改革的法理思辨[J]. 中国土地科学, 2013, 27(10): 31-36.
	ZHANG X G. Juristic analysis on rural collective land ownership reform[J]. China Land Sciences, 2013, 27(10): 31-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	MURPHY T E, ROSSI M A. Land reform and violence: evidence from Mexico[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2016, 131: 106-113.
[9]	张广财, 田传浩, 顾海英. 土地产权保护与村庄犯罪: 来自中国农地确权改革的证据[J]. 中国经济问题, 2021(5): 183-200.
	ZHANG G C, TIAN C H, GU H Y. Land property rights protection and village crime: evidence from land titling in rural China[J]. China Economic Studies, 2021(5): 183-200. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	刘淑云, 韩家彬, 刘玉丰. 农地确权对农户耕地质量保护投资的影响研究[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2021(6): 20-29.
	LIU S Y, HAN J B, LIU Y F. Research on influence of farmland entitlement on farmland quality protection investment[J]. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2021(6): 20-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	才正, 李升生, 杜国明, 等. 农地确权对东北黑土区轮作休耕的影响研究: 以黑龙江省农户为例[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2022(5): 41-49.
	CAI Z, LI S S, DU G M, et al. Impact of farmland confirmation on crop rotation and fallow in black soil region of northeast China: a case study of farmers in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2022(5): 41-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	周淑清, 崔广平. 论农地产权制度改革与生态环境保护[J]. 当代法学, 2009, 23(2): 40-44.
	ZHOU S Q, CUI G P. Rural land title reform and ecological and environmental protection[J]. Contemporary Law Review, 2009, 23(2): 40-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	程令国, 张晔, 刘志彪. 农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗?[J]. 管理世界, 2016, 32(1): 88-98.
	CHENG L G, ZHANG Y, LIU Z B. Has rural land empowerment promoted the transfer of rural land in China?[J]. Management World, 2016, 32(1): 88-98. (in Chinese)
[14]	黄季焜, 冀县卿. 农地使用权确权与农户对农地的长期投资[J]. 管理世界, 2012, 28(9): 76-81.
	HUANG J K, JI X Q. The verification of the right to use farmland and farmers’ long-term investment in farmland[J]. Management World, 2012, 28(9): 76-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	林文声, 秦明, 苏毅清, 等. 新一轮农地确权何以影响农地流转? : 来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的证据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(7): 29-43.
	LIN W S, QIN M, SU Y Q, et al. How can farmland registration and certification affect farmland transfer: an empirical analysis using the CHARLS data[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017(7): 29-43. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	李停. 农村产权抵押融资改革的深化扩面研究: 以安徽省池州市为例[J]. 铜陵学院学报, 2017, 16(2): 40-44.
	LI T. The deepening and expansion research of rural property mortgage finance reform: taking Chizhou City of Anhui Province as an example[J]. Journal of Tongling University, 2017, 16(2): 40-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	唐超, 邱海兰. 农地整合确权对农村劳动力农内转移的影响评估: 基于农地流转的中介效应[J]. 农村经济, 2020(8): 44-51.
	TANG C, QIU H L. Evaluation on the impact of confirmation of farmland integration on rural labor transfer: based on the intermediary effect of farmland transfer[J]. Rural Economy, 2020(8): 44-51. (in Chinese)
[18]	杨宗耀, 陈品, 纪月清. 农地确权如何影响农户举家迁移: 对政策推广不同阶段影响差异的考察[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2022(4): 96-107.
	YANG Z Y, CHEN P, JI Y Q. How does land titling affect rural family migration?: the different impacts of the policy between anticipation to implementation[J]. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2022(4): 96-107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	匡远配, 彭云. 农地确权真的能推动农业适度规模经营吗? : 基于制度效力的视角[J]. 科学决策, 2021(8): 24-37.
	KUANG Y P, PENG Y. Can the confirmation of farmland rights promote the moderate-scale operation of agriculture?: based on institutional effectiveness perspective[J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2021(8): 24-37. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	杨广亮, 王军辉. 新一轮农地确权、农地流转与规模经营: 来自CHFS的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2022, 22(1): 129-152.
	YANG G L, WANG J H. The new wave of land titling program, land transfer and farm size: evidence from the Chinese household financial survey data[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2022, 22(1): 129-152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	高强, 徐雪高. 农业供给侧结构性改革背景下的农地确权[J]. 理论探索, 2017(3): 11-17.
	GAO Q, XU X G. Rural land empowerment under the background of agricultural supply-side structural reform[J]. Theoretical Exploration, 2017(3): 11-17. (in Chinese)
[22]	杨骞, 秦文晋, 刘华军. 环境规制促进产业结构优化升级吗?[J]. 上海经济研究, 2019, 31(6): 83-95.
	YANG Q, QIN W J, LIU H J. Does environmental regulation promote the industrial structure upgrading?[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2019, 31(6): 83-95. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	曹壮, 余康. 农业结构调整对农业全要素生产率增长的影响效应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(2): 357-365.
	CAO Z, YU K. Effect of agricultural structural adjustment on the growth of agricultural total factor productivity[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2020, 37(2): 357-365. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	王艳荣, 谢林燕. 人力资本对农业绿色全要素生产率的影响研究: 基于中介效应的影响路径分析[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(3): 1-7.
	WANG Y R, XIE L Y. Research on the impact of human capital on agricultural green total factor productivity: an analysis of the impact path based on intermediary effect[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 2022, 24(3): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	张舒甜, 王永平. 三产融合对农业绿色全要素生产率的影响分析: 基于农村劳动力转移的视角[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 204-212.
	ZHANG S T, WANG Y P. Impact of integration of rural three industries on agricultural green total factor productivity based on perspective of rural labor transfer[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2023, 35(2): 204-212. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	韩家彬, 刘淑云. 土地确权对农村劳动力转移就业的影响: 来自CHARLS的证据[J]. 人口与经济, 2019(5): 41-52.
	HAN J B, LIU S Y. The research on the impact of the land entitlement to the transfer employment of the rural labor: based on the CHARLS data[J]. Population & Economics, 2019(5): 41-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	康芳. 农村土地确权对农业适度规模经营的影响[J]. 改革与战略, 2015, 31(11): 96-99.
	KANG F. Influence of rural land right confirmation on agricultural moderate scale operation[J]. Reformation & Strategy, 2015, 31(11): 96-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	罗必良. 政策变迁视角下的“三农”: 中国高级化发展的重要力量[J]. 财经问题研究, 2020(9): 3-6.
	LUO B L. “Agriculture, countryside and farmers” from the perspective of policy change: an important force for China’s advanced development[J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2020(9): 3-6. (in Chinese)
[29]	李波, 张俊飚, 李海鹏. 中国农业碳排放时空特征及影响因素分解[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(8): 80-86.
	LI B, ZHANG J B, LI H P. Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and affecting factors decomposition of agricultural carbon emission in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(8): 80-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	陈江华, 罗明忠, 罗琦. 农地确权对农户参与农机服务供给的影响分析: 基于水稻种植户的考察[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2018, 17(5): 508-519.
	CHEN J H, LUO M Z, LUO Q. Impact of farmland registration and certification on farmers’ participation in agricultural machinery service supply: based on investigation of rice growers[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2018, 17(5): 508-519. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	李宁, 汪险生, 王舒娟, 等. 自购还是外包: 农地确权如何影响农户的农业机械化选择?[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(6): 54-75.
	LI N, WANG X S, WANG S J, et al. Self-purchasing or outsourcing: how does farmland right confirmation affect farmers’ choice of agricultural mechanization?[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(6): 54-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	张燕媛, 张忠军. 农户生产环节外包需求意愿与选择行为的偏差分析: 基于江苏、江西两省水稻生产数据的实证[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(2): 9-14.
	ZHANG Y Y, ZHANG Z J. Study on difference between demand willingness and choice behavior of peasant households’ production links outsourcing: based on empirical analysis of rice production data from Jiangsu and Jiangxi Provinces[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2016(2): 9-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	张改清, 卢紫冰, 张昆扬. 农地确权对农户农业机械化作业选择的影响: 基于河南的调查实证[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2021(6): 30-38.
	ZHANG G Q, LU Z B, ZHANG K Y. Impact of farmland certification on farmers’ choice of agricultural mechanization operation: based on survey evidence in Henan Province[J]. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2021(6): 30-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	高强, 李凌超, 丁慧媛. 农户兼业对农业生产效率的影响研究: 基于山东省胶州市调查数据的分析[J]. 山东经济, 2011, 27(6): 56-61.
	GAO Q, LI L C, DING H Y. Study on the influence of farmers’ part-time employment on agricultural production efficiency: based on the survey data of Jiaozhou City[J]. Shandong Economy, 2011, 27(6): 56-61. (in Chinese)
[35]	李伟. 农业产业化对农业碳排放绩效的影响效应分析: 以河北省为例[J]. 世界农业, 2017(6): 53-59.
	LI W. Analysis on the effect of agricultural industrialization on agricultural carbon emission performance: taking Hebei Province as an example[J]. World Agriculture, 2017(6): 53-59. (in Chinese)
[36]	张朝. 税收政策对农业产业化发展的影响研究[J]. 现代化农业, 2022(11): 73-75.
	ZHANG C. Study on the influence of tax policy on the development of agricultural industrialization[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2022(11): 73-75. (in Chinese)
[37]	陈媛媛, 傅伟. 土地承包经营权流转、劳动力流动与农业生产[J]. 管理世界, 2017, 33(11): 79-93.
	CHEN Y Y, FU W. Transfer of land contractual management right, labor flow and agricultural production[J]. Management World, 2017, 33(11): 79-93. (in Chinese)
[38]	宋德勇, 邓捷, 弓媛媛. 我国环境规制对绿色经济效率的影响分析[J]. 学习与实践, 2017(3): 23-33.
	SONG D Y, DENG J, GONG Y Y. Analysis on the influence of China’s environmental regulation on the efficiency of green economy[J]. Study and Practice, 2017(3): 23-33. (in Chinese)
[39]	王兆峰, 杜瑶瑶. 基于SBM-DEA模型湖南省碳排放效率时空差异及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(5): 797-806.
	WANG Z F, DU Y Y. Spatial-temporal differences and influencing factors of carbon emission efficiency in Hunan Province based on SBM-DEA model[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(5): 797-806. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	钱争鸣, 刘晓晨. 资源环境约束下绿色经济效率的空间演化模式[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2014, 54(5): 31-39
	QIAN Z M, LIU X C. The spatial evolution of green economic efficiency with resource and environmental constraint[J]. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 54(5): 31-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	OH D H. A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2010, 34(3): 183-197.
[42]	姜晗, 杨皓然, 吴群. 东部沿海经济区耕地利用效率的时空格局分异及影响因素研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(2): 321-330.
	JIANG H, YANG H R, WU Q. The spatial and temporal differentiation of the farmland utilization efficiency in the Eastern Coastal Economic Zone[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2020, 41(2): 321-330. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	田云, 尹忞昊. 中国农业碳排放再测算: 基本现状、动态演进及空间溢出效应[J]. 中国农村经济, 2022(3): 104-127.
	TIAN Y, YIN M H. Re-evaluation of China’s agricultural carbon emissions: basic status, dynamic evolution and spatial spillover effects[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022(3): 104-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44]	赵荣钦, 黄贤金, 彭补拙. 南京城市系统碳循环与碳平衡分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(6): 758-770.
	ZHAO R Q, HUANG X J, PENG B Z. Research on carbon cycle and carbon balance of Nanjing urban system[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(6): 758-770. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45]	赵荣钦, 刘英, 马林, 等. 基于碳收支核算的河南省县域空间横向碳补偿研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(10): 1675-1687.
	ZHAO R Q, LIU Y, MA L, et al. County-level carbon compensation of Henan Province based on carbon budget estimation[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(10): 1675-1687. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46]	刘欣铭, 孙丽, 王康, 等. 中国省域农田生态系统碳排放时空差异及公平性研究[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2019, 42(2): 23-30.
	LIU X M, SUN L, WANG K, et al. Spatial and temporal differences and equity of carbon emissions in farmland ecosystems in China[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2019, 42(2): 23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[47]	闵继胜, 胡浩. 中国农业生产温室气体排放量的测算[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(7): 21-27.
	MIN J S, HU H. Calculation of greenhouse gases emission from agricultural production in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(7): 21-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[48]	韩召迎, 孟亚利, 徐娇, 等. 区域农田生态系统碳足迹时空差异分析: 以江苏省为案例[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(5): 1034-1041.
	HAN Z Y, MENG Y L, XU J, et al. Temporal and spatial difference in carbon footprint of regional farmland ecosystem: taking Jiangsu Province as a case[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(5): 1034-1041. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49]	陈罗烨, 薛领, 雪燕. 中国农业净碳汇时空演化特征分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(4): 596-607.
	CHEN L Y, XUE L, XUE Y. Spatial-temporal characteristics of China’s agricultural net carbon sink[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(4): 596-607. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[50]	李江一. 农地确权对农民非农业劳动参与的影响[J]. 经济科学, 2020(1): 113-126.
	LI J Y. The effect of land entitlement on non-agricultural labor participation[J]. Economic Science, 2020(1): 113-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[51]	赵德起, 谭越璇. 制度创新、技术进步和规模化经营与农民收入增长关系研究[J]. 经济问题探索, 2018(9): 165-178.
	ZHAO D Q, TAN Y X. Study on the relationship between institutional innovation, technological progress and large-scale operation and farmers’ income growth[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2018(9): 165-178. (in Chinese)
[52]	李扬. 数字普惠金融对农村产业融合的影响研究[D]. 广州: 广东财经大学, 2023.
	LI Y. Research on the impact of digital inclusive finance on rural industrial integration[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Finance, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[53]	陈儒, 邓悦, 姜志德. 基于修正碳计量的区域农业碳补偿时空格局[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(6): 168-177.
	CHEN R, DENG Y, JIANG Z D. Spatial and temporal pattern of regional agricultural carbon compensation based on the modified carbon measurement[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(6): 168-177. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[54]	吴昊玥, 何艳秋, 陈文宽, 等. 中国农业碳补偿率空间效应及影响因素研究: 基于空间Durbin模型[J]. 农业技术经济, 2020(3): 110-123.
	WU H Y, HE Y Q, CHEN W K, et al. Spatial effect and influencing factors of China’s agricultural carbon compensation rate based on spatial durbin model[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2020(3): 110-123. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[55]	曹俊文, 陶强强. 长江经济带农业碳补偿修正测算及分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(4): 693-698.
	CAO J W, TAO Q Q. Calculation and analysis of agricultural carbon compensation in the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(4): 693-698. (in Chinese with English abstract)

变量名称 Variable name	变量符号 Variable symbol	计算方法 Calculation method	平均值 Mean	标准差 Standard deviation	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum
农业碳排放效率 Agricultural carbon emission efficiency	A	用SSBM-GML模型测算得到 Measured via the SSBM-GML model	1.018 8	0.060 8	0.768 0	1.260 2
农地确权率 Rural land empowerment rate	R	颁发土地承包经营权证份数/家庭承包经营农户数	0.893 7	0.101 8	0.034 3	1.090 1
		Number of land contract management rights certificates issued divided by the number of family contract management households
劳动力迁移 Labor migration	T	外出务工劳动力/第一产业从业人员 Outside labor force divided by primary sector workers	0.373 1	0.104 2	0.077 8	0.787 8
农业产业结构合理化水平 Rationalization of agricultural structure	L	林牧渔业产值/农林牧副渔总产值 Value of forestry and fisheries production/ gross value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fisheries production	0.439 6	0.094 3	0.173 8	0.619 3
农地规模化经营水平 Scale management level of rural land	P	粮食播种面积 Grain sown area	3.760 1	3.037 2	0.046 4	14.338 1
农地流转水平 Rural land transfer level	C	家庭承包耕地流转总面积/家庭承包经营耕地面积 Total area of family contracted arable land transferred divided by the area of family contracted arable land operated	0.226 5	0.175 2	0.013 6	0.895 8
农业财政支持 Financial support	X₁	财政支农支出/财政总支出 Fiscal expenditure on agriculture divided by total fiscal expenditure	1.048 0	0.497 8	0.306 2	3.006 3
城镇化水平 Urbanization level	X₂	城镇人口/总人口 Urban population divided by total population	0.545 3	0.140 2	0.268 6	0.895 8
农业发展水平 Agricultural development level	X₃	农林牧渔业增加值/农林牧渔业从业人员 Value added of agriculture, forestry and fisheries divided by number of employees in agriculture, forestry and fisheries	2.125 1	1.257 2	0.290 9	7.456 1
自然条件 Natural conditions	X₄	受灾面积/农作物播种总面积 Affected area divided by total sown area of crops	0.205 3	0.147 3	0.005 9	0.935 9
农经占比 Proportion of agricultural economy	X₅	农业GDP/GDP Agricultural GDP divided by the regional GDP	0.131 9	0.124 2	0.002 9	1.016 7
农业对外开放程度 Foreign trade in agriculture	X₆	农业进出口总额/地区生产总值 Total agricultural imports and exports divided by gross regional product	0.394 6	0.358 3	0.006 6	2.209 4

变量名称 Variable name	变量符号 Variable symbol	计算方法 Calculation method	平均值 Mean	标准差 Standard deviation	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum
农业碳排放效率 Agricultural carbon emission efficiency	A	用SSBM-GML模型测算得到 Measured via the SSBM-GML model	1.018 8	0.060 8	0.768 0	1.260 2
农地确权率 Rural land empowerment rate	R	颁发土地承包经营权证份数/家庭承包经营农户数	0.893 7	0.101 8	0.034 3	1.090 1
		Number of land contract management rights certificates issued divided by the number of family contract management households
劳动力迁移 Labor migration	T	外出务工劳动力/第一产业从业人员 Outside labor force divided by primary sector workers	0.373 1	0.104 2	0.077 8	0.787 8
农业产业结构合理化水平 Rationalization of agricultural structure	L	林牧渔业产值/农林牧副渔总产值 Value of forestry and fisheries production/ gross value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fisheries production	0.439 6	0.094 3	0.173 8	0.619 3
农地规模化经营水平 Scale management level of rural land	P	粮食播种面积 Grain sown area	3.760 1	3.037 2	0.046 4	14.338 1
农地流转水平 Rural land transfer level	C	家庭承包耕地流转总面积/家庭承包经营耕地面积 Total area of family contracted arable land transferred divided by the area of family contracted arable land operated	0.226 5	0.175 2	0.013 6	0.895 8
农业财政支持 Financial support	X₁	财政支农支出/财政总支出 Fiscal expenditure on agriculture divided by total fiscal expenditure	1.048 0	0.497 8	0.306 2	3.006 3
城镇化水平 Urbanization level	X₂	城镇人口/总人口 Urban population divided by total population	0.545 3	0.140 2	0.268 6	0.895 8
农业发展水平 Agricultural development level	X₃	农林牧渔业增加值/农林牧渔业从业人员 Value added of agriculture, forestry and fisheries divided by number of employees in agriculture, forestry and fisheries	2.125 1	1.257 2	0.290 9	7.456 1
自然条件 Natural conditions	X₄	受灾面积/农作物播种总面积 Affected area divided by total sown area of crops	0.205 3	0.147 3	0.005 9	0.935 9
农经占比 Proportion of agricultural economy	X₅	农业GDP/GDP Agricultural GDP divided by the regional GDP	0.131 9	0.124 2	0.002 9	1.016 7
农业对外开放程度 Foreign trade in agriculture	X₆	农业进出口总额/地区生产总值 Total agricultural imports and exports divided by gross regional product	0.394 6	0.358 3	0.006 6	2.209 4

变量 Variable	回归1 Regression 1	回归2 Regression 2	回归3 Regression 3
R	0.030 9^*** (2.78)	0.029 4^*** (2.92)	0. 036 8^*** (3.37)
X₁	0.022 8^** (2.18)	0.025 8^** (1.78)	0. 026 4^* (1.64)
X₆	0.000 4^* (1.84)	0.000 3 (1.59)	0. 000 1 (1.43)
X₂		0.321 8^** (2.17)	0. 242 1 (1.55)
X₃		0.005 3 (0.73)	0.002 8 (0.57)
X₄			0.012 7^* (1.73)
X₅			-0.073 4^*** (-2.69)
within R²	0.111 1	0.121 9	0.146 4

变量 Variable	回归1 Regression 1	回归2 Regression 2	回归3 Regression 3
R	0.030 9^*** (2.78)	0.029 4^*** (2.92)	0. 036 8^*** (3.37)
X₁	0.022 8^** (2.18)	0.025 8^** (1.78)	0. 026 4^* (1.64)
X₆	0.000 4^* (1.84)	0.000 3 (1.59)	0. 000 1 (1.43)
X₂		0.321 8^** (2.17)	0. 242 1 (1.55)
X₃		0.005 3 (0.73)	0.002 8 (0.57)
X₄			0.012 7^* (1.73)
X₅			-0.073 4^*** (-2.69)
within R²	0.111 1	0.121 9	0.146 4

变量 Variable	回归4 Regression 4	回归5 Regression 5
d	0.014 5^*** (2.38)	0.013 4^** (2.14)
within R²	0.113 4	0.136 7

农地确权对农业碳排放效率的影响——基于30个省级行政区的面板数据

Impact of rural land empowerment on carbon emission efficiency in agriculture: a panel data study based on 30 province-level administrative regions across China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 55

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

变量 Variable	回归6 Regression 6			回归7 Regression 7			回归8 Regression 8
	第一步 Step 1	第二步 Step 2	第三步 Step 3	第一步 Step 1	第二步 Step 2	第三步 Step 3	第一步 Step 1	第二步 Step 2	第三步 Step 3
	A	T	A	A	L	A	A	P	A
R	0.036 8^*** (3.37)	0.031 2^*** (2.89)	0.029 3 (0.98)	0.036 8^*** (3.37)	0.011 3^*** (3.74)	0.025 1 (1.28)	0.036 8^*** (3.37)	0.568 7^** (2.46)	0.028 8 (1.27)
T	—	—	0.026 1^* (1.78)	—	—	—	—	—	—
L	—	—	—	—	—	0.018 1^** (2.01)	—	—	—
P	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.002 3^*** (2.70)
within R²	0.146 4	0.438 9	0.146 6	0.146 4	0.374 4	0.146 7	0.146 4	0.739 6	0.147 9

变量	回归9 Regression 9
R	0.044 4^*** (3.21)
C	0.057 7^* (1.83)
R×C	0.353 4^*** (2.59)
within R²	0.189 3

[1]	成威松, 郑粟文, 高华洁, 白云丽, 叶春辉. 劳动力老龄化会使农户顺利流转农地吗?[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1545-1557.
[2]	许连君. 行为经济学视角的农户土地流转意愿分析——以浙江农户为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 367-372.
[3]	李永安. 当前农地制度下的困局与农地市场化流转机制改革[J]. , 2013, 25(6): 0-1448.