城市草坪不同管理方式下土壤动物群落结构特征与差异

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.11.09

浙江农业学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 1835-1843.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.11.09

城市草坪不同管理方式下土壤动物群落结构特征与差异

罗熳丽^{1, 2}, 黄婷婷³, 肖玖金^{1, 2, *}, 黄进平³, 张健^{1, 2}, 彭彩云^{1, 2}

1.四川农业大学林学院, 四川温江611130;
2.四川农业大学生态林业研究所, 四川温江611130;
3.四川农业大学旅游学院, 四川都江堰 611830

收稿日期:2017-05-06 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-05
通讯作者: 肖玖金,E-mail:j.xiao@sicau.edu.cn
作者简介:罗熳丽(1993—),女,四川泸州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林生态学。E-mail:ml.luo@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31400457); 四川省景观与游憩研究中心项目(JGYQ2015012)

Characteristics and differences of soil fauna community in different management modes of urban lawn

LUO Manli^{1, 2}, HUANG Tingting³, XIAO Jiujin^{1, 2, *}, HUANG Jinping³, ZHANG Jian^{1, 2}, PENG Caiyun^{1, 2}

1.Forestry College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang 611130, China;
2. Insitute of Ecological Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang 611130, China;
3. Tourism College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan 611830, China

Received:2017-05-06 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解城市草坪不同管理方式下土壤动物的群落结构,于2015年7月,大型动物采用手捡法,中小型土壤动物采用干、湿漏斗法进行分离,对未除草、人工除草和人为践踏3种管理方式下草坪土壤动物的群落结构进行调查。试验共捕获土壤动物1 009只,隶属于2门11纲20科;3种草坪管理方式下土壤动物平均密度排序为未除草(3.84×10⁴只·m^-2)>人工除草(3.63×10⁴只·m^-2)>人为践踏(2.79×10⁴只·m^-2),土壤动物类群数为未除草(33)>人工除草(27)>人为践踏(20)。未除草与人工除草管理方式的土壤动物密度-类群指数(DG)有显著性差异(P<0.05),各管理方式间土壤动物群落多样性指数(H')差异不显著(P>0.05),大型土壤动物类群数差异性显著(P<0.05)。表明城市草坪土壤动物的丰富度、多样性和均匀度与人为干扰强度呈紧密的负相关关系。

关键词: 城市草坪, 土壤动物, 群落结构, 类群指数

Abstract: To reveal the community structure of soil fauna in different managements in urban lawn, no weeding, weeding and trampled grassland were chosen as sample plots in July 2015. Soil macro-fauna were picked up by hands. nematodes and meso-fauna were separated and collected from the soil samples by Baermann and Tullgren methods, respectively. Results showed that soil fauna had 1 009 individuals, belonging to 2 phylums, 11 classes, 20 families. The order of the average density of soil fauna was no weeding (3.84×10⁴ ind.·)>weeding (3.63×10⁴ ind.·)>trampling (2.79×10⁴ ind.·). The order of species number was no weeding (33)>weeding (27)>trampling (20). There were significant differences between no weeding and weeding on the density-group index (DG) (P<0.05). The various diversity index (H') among the lawn managements were not significantly different (P>0.05), while the specie numbers of soil macro-fauna were significantly different (P<0.05). Results indicated that the richness, diversity and homogeneity of soil fauna were closely negatively correlated with intensity of human interference.

Key words: urban lawn, soil fauna, community characteristic, group index

中图分类号:

S154.5

罗熳丽, 黄婷婷, 肖玖金, 黄进平, 张健, 彭彩云. 城市草坪不同管理方式下土壤动物群落结构特征与差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(11): 1835-1843.

LUO Manli, HUANG Tingting, XIAO Jiujin, HUANG Jinping, ZHANG Jian, PENG Caiyun. Characteristics and differences of soil fauna community in different management modes of urban lawn[J]. , 2017, 29(11): 1835-1843.

参考文献

[1] 孔繁花, 尹海伟. 城市绿地功能的研究现状、问题及发展方向[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(2): 119-124.
KONG F H, YIN H W. Urban green space functions: present, problems and future[J]. Journal of Naming Forestry University ( Natural Science Edition ), 2010, 34(2): 119-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 蒋炳伸. 郑州市不同绿地类型土壤理化性状与土壤微生物特征研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2005.
JIANG B S. Studying on the properties of physics chemistry and microbial characteristic of soil in Zhengzhou city [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 赵勇, 李树人, 阎志平. 城市绿地的滞尘效应及评价方法[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2002, 21(6): 582-586.
ZHAO Y, LI S R, YAN Z P. The effect of greenland on absorbed dust and its assessment method[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University , 2002, 21(6): 582-586. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 何薇, 黄尤优, 严贤春, 等. 我国城市绿地景观缓解城市热环境效应的研究进展[J]. 四川环境, 2016, 35(2): 153-156.
HE W, HUANG Y Y, YAN X C, et al. Review on China’s urban green landscape reducing urban thermal effect[J]. Sichuan Environment , 2016, 35(2): 153-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 张浩, 王祥荣. 城市绿地的三维生态特征及其生态功能[J]. 中国环境科学, 2001, 21(2): 6-9.
ZHANG H, WANG X R. Three-dimensional ecological characters of urban green space and its ecological function[J]. China Environmental Science , 2001, 21(2): 6-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 朱永恒, 赵春雨, 王宗英, 等. 我国土壤动物群落生态学研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005,24(12):1477-1481.
ZHU Y H, ZHAO C Y, WANG Z Y, et al. Research on soil animal community ecology in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology , 2005, 24(12): 1477-1481. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 王海霞, 殷秀琴, 周道玮. 松嫩草原区农牧林复合系统中小型土壤动物群落生态研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(10): 1715-1718.
WANG H X, YIN X Q, ZHOU D W. Ecological study on small-middle size soil animals in a compound ecosystem of farmland, grassland and woodland in the grassland region of Songnen Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 2003, 14(10): 1715-1718. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 梁文举, 闻大中. 土壤生物及其对土壤生态学发展的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(1): 137-140.
LIANG W J, WEN D Z. Soil biota and its role in soil ecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 2001, 12(1): 137-140. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 苏越, 邬天媛, 张雪萍. 我国土壤动物环境指示功能研究进展[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2011 (6): 64-67.
SU Y, WU T Y, ZHANG X P. Research advances in the indicative function soil fauna to environment in China[J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study , 2011 (6): 64-67. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 朱新玉, 胡云川. 土壤动物对土壤质量变化的响应述评[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(11): 236-240.
ZHU X Y, HU Y C. Review on the response of soil fauna to soil quality change[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin , 2011, 27(11): 236-240. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 史玉菲, 苏越, 张雪萍. 我国土壤动物功能作用的研究进展[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 2011, 27(3): 84-88.
SHI Y F, SU Y, ZHANG X P. Research advance in the functional role of soil fauna in China[J]. Natural Science Journal of Harbin Normal University , 2011, 27(3): 84-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 马文明, 陈智华, 吴鹏飞. 我国土壤动物生态学研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(22): 9644-9645.
MA W M, CHEN Z H, WU P F. Research progress on soil animal ecology in China[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences , 2008, 36(22): 9644-9645. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 向昌国, 杨世俊, 聂琴. 土壤动物对土壤环境的生物指示作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2003, 23(4): 364-368.
XIANG C G, YANG S J, NIE Q. The biological indication of soil animals to soil environment[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin , 2003, 23(4): 364-368. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 殷秀琴, 马祝阳. Tullgren法对土壤动物的分离效率[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版). 2002, 34(2): 84-91.
YING X Q, MA Z Y. Segregate efficiency of Tullgren method to middle-small-sized soil animal[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University ( Natural Science Edition ). 2002, 34(2): 84-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] DONG W, YIN X. Transformation of carbon and nitrogen by earthworms in the decomposition processes of broad-leaved litters[J]. Chinese Geographical Science , 2007, 17(2): 166-172.
[16] YIN X, SONG B, DONG W, et al. A review on the eco-geography of soil fauna in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences , 2010, 20(3): 333-346.
[17] HUHTA V. The role of soil fauna in ecosystems: A historical review[J]. Pedobiologia , 2007, 50(6): 489-495.
[18] BARDGETT R D, CHAN K F. Experimental evidence that soil fauna enhance nutrient mineralization and plant nutrient uptake in montane grassland ecosystems[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry , 1999, 31(7): 1007-1014.
[19] 席嘉宾. 草坪绿地在城市园林绿化中的现状与发展对策[J]. 草业科学, 2000,17(3):58-61.
XI J B. The role and developing strategies of turf in urban landscape development[J]. Pratacultural Science , 2000, 17(3): 58-61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 郑艳苗. 松嫩草地植被不同演替阶段中小型土壤动物的群落动态变化[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2007.
ZHENG Y M. Dynamic of soil mesofauna communities in different vegetation succession stages in Songnen Grassland [D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 吴东辉, 胡克, 殷秀琴. 松嫩草原中南部退化羊草草地生态恢复与重建中大型土壤动物群落生态特征[J]. 草业学报, 2004, 13(5): 121-126.
WU D H, HU K, YIN X Q. Ecological characteristics of soil macro-animal community in mid-south Songnen degraded Leymus chinensis grasslands under restoration succession[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica , 2004, 13(5): 121-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 易兰, 由文辉, 宋永昌. 天童常绿阔叶林五个演替阶段凋落物中的土壤动物群落[J]. 生态学报. 2005, 25(3): 466-473.
YI L, YOU W H, SONG Y C. Soil animal communities in the litter of the evergreen broad-leaved forest at five succession stages in Tiantong[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 2005, 25(3): 466-473. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] YIN W Y. Studies on soil animals in subtropical China[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment , 1997, 62(2): 119-126.
[24] RUSEK J. Microhabitats of Collembola (Insecta: Entognatha) in beech and spruce forests and their influence on biodiversity[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology , 2001, 37(1): 237-244.
[25] 尹文英, 胡圣豪, 宁应之, 等. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[26] 尹文英, 杨逢春, 王振中, 等. 中国亚热带土壤动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992.
[27] 李鸿兴, 隋敬之,周士秀, 等. 昆虫分类检索[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1987.
[28] 钟觉民. 幼虫分类学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1990.
[29] 廖崇惠, 李健雄. 再论DG指数的性质与应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2009,17(2): 127-134.
LIAO C H, LI J X. Re-evaluating the character and application of density-group index (DG)[J]. Biodiversity Science , 2009, 17(2):127-134. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 王移, 卫伟, 杨兴中, 等. 我国土壤动物与土壤环境要素相互关系研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(9): 2441-2448.
WANG Y, WEI W, YANG X Z, et al. Interrelationships between soil fauna and soil environmental factors in China: Research advance[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 2010, 21(9): 2441-2448. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 葛宝明, 张代臻, 张华彬, 等. 盐城市春季几种城市绿地大型土壤动物群落结构与功能群[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(1): 87-92.
GE B M, ZHANG D Z, ZHANG H B, et al. Community structure and functional groups of soil macrofauna in urban green spaces of Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province in spring[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology , 2012, 31(1): 87-92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 肖玖金, 黄晓丽, 朱万强, 等. 猕猴桃园春季土壤动物群落结构特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2013, 19(3): 454-458.
XIAO J J, HUANG X L, ZHU W Q, et al. Community structure of soil fauna in kiwifruit orchards in spring[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology , 2013, 19(3): 454-458. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 董洁, 王康, 董宽虎. 不同践踏程度对观赏草坪的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(2): 93-97.
DONG J, WANG K, DONG K H. Effects of trample on decorative turfgrass[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland , 2008, 30(2): 93-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 周兰胜, 戴其根, 张洪程, 等. 不同践踏强度对草坪坪床理化性状的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2005,33(5):64-68.
ZHOU L S, DAI Q G, ZHANG H C, et al. Effects of trampling stress on the characters of turf-bed[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences , 2005, 33(5): 64-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 吴东辉, 张柏, 陈鹏. 长春市不同土地利用条件下大型土壤动物群落结构与组成[J]. 动物学报, 2006, 52(2): 279-287.
WU D H, ZHANG B, CHEN P. Community structure and composition of soil macrofauna under different land use in Changchun City[J]. Acta Zoologica Sinica , 2006, 52(2): 279-287. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 殷秀琴, 邱丽丽, 杨令宾, 等. 森林凋落物-土壤动物-土壤系统中营养元素含量关系及分异[J]. 地理研究, 2006,25(2):320-326.
YIN X Q, QIU L L, YANG L B, et al. The relation and difference of nutritional elements in forest litter-macrofaunas-soil system[J]. Geographical Research , 2006, 25(2): 320-326. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 葛宝明, 程宏毅, 郑祥, 等. 浙江金华不同城市绿地大型土壤动物群落结构与多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2005,13(3): 197-203.
GE B M, CHENG H Y, ZHENG X, et al. Community structure and diversity of soil macrofauna from different urban greenbelts in Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Biodiversity , 2005, 13(3): 197-203. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] 颜绍馗, SINGH A N, 邱红兵, 等. DG指数在定量多样性时的缺陷及其内涵解析[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(5): 524-530.
YAN S K, SINGH A N, QIU H B, et al. Pitfalls of DG index in quantifying biodiversity and its intrinsic implication as a community parameter: a comment[J]. Biodiversity Science , 2009, 17(5): 524-530. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39] 袁金荣, 朱巽, 朱雅安, 等. 湖南永州地区不同生境条件下钙质土土壤动物多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(9): 1073-1076.
YUAN J R, ZHU X, ZHU Y A, et al. Calcareous soil’s faunal diversity in different habitats of Yongzhou, Hunan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology , 2006, 25(9): 1073-1076. (in Chinese with English abstract)

城市草坪不同管理方式下土壤动物群落结构特征与差异

Characteristics and differences of soil fauna community in different management modes of urban lawn

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈乾丽, 汪汉成, 梁永进, 蔡刘体, 黄宇, 周浩, 李忠, 韩洁. 烤后健康烟叶和霉烂烟叶真菌群落结构分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1019-1028.
[2]	罗熳丽, 兰琴, 王戈, 魏洪, 肖玖金, 张健. 施肥对农田土壤动物群落结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 946-954.
[3]	苟丽琼, 姚恒, 王戈, 黄如成, 段均华, 肖玖金, 张健. 稻草不同还田方式对土壤动物群落结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 450-457.
[4]	黄玉梅, 王若然, 罗智丹, 李向, 邓楚璇. 模拟酸雨和除草剂单一及复合胁迫对城市草坪土壤动物的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 2095-2108.
[5]	张茜, 杨东旭, 钟永德, 周国英, 李文明. 黄石寨景区旅游活动对典型植物群落的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(7): 1158-1165.
[6]	李媛媛, 石凯, 德力格尔. 内蒙古草盲蝽复合组昆虫群落结构及区系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1558-1563.
[7]	张爱菊1，2，3,刘金殿1，2，3,，杨元杰1，2，3，郭爱环1，2，3，顾志敏1，2，3，. 钱塘江桐庐渔业资源增殖放流区底栖动物群落结构特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(8): 1323-.
[8]	刘丹, 吴凤芝. 转Pal基因拟南芥对根际土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(12): 2068-2075.
[9]	韩丽娜, 丁哲利, 曾会才, 郑伟, 何应对, 葛宇. 功能性有机肥对大白菜生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(10): 1718-1723.
[10]	徐幼平;蔡新忠;祝小祥;*. 水旱作物轮作田块土壤中微生物群落结构的PLFA法比较分析[J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1061.
[11]	苏朝安;吴全聪;禹海鑫;孙莲 . 丽水市桃园生态护理区节肢动物的群落结构及生物多样性[J]. , 2008, 20(1): 0-44.
[12]	张永靖;潘志崇;童丽娟. 宁波地区稻田蜘蛛群落结构研究[J]. , 2002, 14(6): 0-343.
[13]	张人君;何锦豪;郑晋元;李妙寿;茅富亭;陈传权;魏福香. 浙江省麦田和油菜田杂草发生种类及危害[J]. , 2000, 12(06): 0-316.
[14]	李妙寿;蔡鼎华;元茂瑶;孙乐平;李忠豪. 温州农区稻田杂草群落及其演替[J]. , 2000, 12(06): 0-330.
[15]	王强;何锦豪;李妙寿;戴余有;施德;叶贵标. 浙江省水稻田杂草发生种类及危害[J]. , 2000, 12(06): 0-324.