不同矮化中间砧对黄金梨树体生长的影响及嫁接亲和性相关性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.06.08

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1175-1182.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.06.08

不同矮化中间砧对黄金梨树体生长的影响及嫁接亲和性相关性分析

李含芬^a(), 李鼎立^b, 王然^b, 马春晖^b^,^*()

a.青岛农业大学图书馆,山东青岛 266109
b.青岛农业大学园艺学院,山东青岛 266109

收稿日期:2021-09-14 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-06-30
通讯作者: 马春晖
作者简介:*马春晖,E-mail： machunhui2000@163.com
李含芬（1970—）,女,甘肃白银人,馆员,研究方向为园艺植物栽培生理。E-mail: lihanfen1@sina.com
基金资助:
国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-29-07);山东省农业科技资金项目(2019YQ015)

Effects of different dwarfing interstocks on Whangkumbae pear growth and correlation analysis of graft-compatibility

LI Hanfen^a(), LI Dingli^b, WANG Ran^b, MA Chunhui^b^,^*()

a. Library, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, Shandong, China
b. College of Horticulture, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, Shandong, China

Received:2021-09-14 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-06-30
Contact: MA Chunhui

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探索不同梨矮化中间砧对树体生长发育的影响,本试验以杜梨为基砧,嫁接23种不同中间砧与黄金梨砧穗组合为试材,于第4个生长季调查了嫁接口周长、中间砧周长、接穗新梢长度、新梢叶片数、以及叶片卷曲度等指标,统计分析结果显示：BA29、OHF97、K6矮化中间砧对黄金梨的致矮效果最好;中间砧嫁接亲和性与砧木周长、枝梢及叶片生长存在一定的相关性,相关性顺序依次为基砧周长>新梢节间长度>上接口周长与接穗周长的比值（D/E）>下接口周长与中间砧周长比值（B/C）>新梢叶片卷曲度>新梢长度,在亲和性早期鉴定中可用新梢叶片卷曲度来判断亲和力的大小,以上接口与接穗周长的比值（D/E）来表示亲和力更准确。

关键词: 梨, 嫁接亲和性, 株高, 叶片卷曲度

Abstract:

Abstract: In order to explore the effects of dwarfing interstock on pear tree growth, the 23 different interstocks, each of which was combined between Pyrus betulaefolia （as the base stock） and Whangkumbae pear (as the scion), were used as test material. After four years of growth, the indexes of graft union circumference, interstock circumference, length of scion shoot, number of shoot leaves and leaf curl were investigated. Statistical analysis results showed that: BA29, OHF97 and K6 dwarfing interstocks had the best dwarfing effect on Whangkumbae pear. There was a certain correlation between interstock graft-compatibility and rootstock circumference, branch and leaf growth, and the correlation order for the base stock circumference > shoot internode length > ratio of upper graft union circumference to scion circumference (D/E) > ratio of lower graft union circumference to interstock circumference (B/C) > shoot leaf curls > shoots length. The leaf curl was thought to be useful for the early screening of the graft-compatibility, and the ratio of upper graft union circumference to scion circumference (D/E) was more accurate to indicate graft-compatibility.

Key words: pear, graft compatibility, plant height, leaf curl

中图分类号:

S661.2

李含芬, 李鼎立, 王然, 马春晖. 不同矮化中间砧对黄金梨树体生长的影响及嫁接亲和性相关性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1175-1182.

LI Hanfen, LI Dingli, WANG Ran, MA Chunhui. Effects of different dwarfing interstocks on Whangkumbae pear growth and correlation analysis of graft-compatibility[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1175-1182.

图/表 7

参考文献 25

[1]	李莉, 宣景宏, 杜国栋, 等. 梨矮化砧木选育及其应用研究进展[J]. 北方果树, 2015(1): 1-3.
	LI L, XUAN J H, DU G D, et al. Progresses on the breeding and application of dwarfing rootstocks of pear[J]. Northern Fruits, 2015(1): 1-3. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	李登科, 邵嘉鸣, 张忠仁, 等. 梨K系矮化自根砧木的选育[J]. 中国果树, 1997(3): 20-21.
	LI D K, SHAO J M, ZHANG Z R, et al. The breeding of dwarfing rootstocks of pear of K series[J]. China Fruits, 1997(3): 20-21. (in Chinese)
[3]	姜淑苓, 贾敬贤, 王斐, 等. 三个梨树中间砧木对嫁接树的矮化效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(23): 4886-4892.
	JIANG S L, JIA J X, WANG F, et al. The dwarfing effect of three pear dwarfing intermediate stocks on grafting trees[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(23): 4886-4892. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	ROBBANI M, BANNO K, KAKEGAWA M. Differential flooding tolerance of some dwarfing pear rootstock clones selected from the progenies of Pyrus betulaefolia and P. calleryana[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 2006, 75(4): 297-305. DOI URL
[5]	沙守峰, 张绍铃, 李俊才. 梨矮化砧木的选育及其应用研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2009(8): 140-143.
	SHA S F, ZHANG S L, LI J C. Progresses on the breeding and application of dwarfing rootstocks of pear[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2009(8): 140-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	GONÇALVES B, CORREIA C M, SILVA A P, et al. Variation in xylem structure and function in roots and stems of scion-rootstock combinations of sweet cherry tree (Prunus avium L.)[J]. Trees, 2007, 21(2): 121-130. DOI URL
[7]	ERMEL F F, KERVELLA J, CATESSON A M, et al. Localized graft incompatibility in pear/quince (Pyrus communis/Cydonia oblonga) combinations: multivariate analysis of histological data from 5-month-old grafts[J]. Tree Physiology, 1999, 19(10): 645-654. DOI URL
[8]	MARTÍNEZ-BALLESTA M C, ALCARAZ-LÓPEZ C, MURIES B, et al. Physiological aspects of rootstock-scion interactions[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 127(2): 112-118. DOI URL
[9]	吴强. 杉木砧木质量对接穗生长影响的研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1996, 14(2): 264-266.
	WU Q. The influence of stock quality on growth of scion in Cunninghamia laneolata[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 1996, 14(2): 264-266. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	MARGUERIT E, BRENDEL O, LEBON E, et al. Rootstock control of scion transpiration and its acclimation to water deficit are controlled by different genes[J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 194(2): 416-429. DOI URL
[11]	GEBHARDT K, GOLDBACH H. Establishment, graft union characteristics and growth of Prunus micrografts[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1988, 72(1): 153-159. DOI URL
[12]	石雪晖, 王淑英, 吴艳纯, 等. 葡萄叶片中生理生化物质含量与嫁接亲和力关系的研究[J]. 果树学报, 2001, 18(1): 24-27.
	SHI X H, WANG S Y, WU Y C, et al. Study on the effects of the content of physiological and biochemical substances in the rootstock leaves to the graft compatibility[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2001, 18(1): 24-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	PINA A N, ERREA P. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility-incompatibility[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2005, 106(1): 1-11. DOI URL
[14]	袁继存, 赵德英, 徐锴, 等. 辽砧2号中间砧对华红苹果不同部位养分含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(1): 70-73.
	YUAN J C, ZHAO D Y, XU K, et al. Effects of intermediate stock Liaozhen No.2 on nutrient contents in different parts of Huahong apple tree[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2016, 28(1): 70-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	KOEPKE T, DHINGRA A. Rootstock scion somatogenetic interactions in perennial composite plants[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2013, 32(9): 1321-1337. DOI URL
[16]	曹建华, 林位夫, 陈俊明. 砧木与接穗嫁接亲合力研究综述[J]. 热带农业科学, 2005, 25(4): 64-69.
	CAO J H, LIN W F, CHEN J M. Studies of affinity between rootstock and scion[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2005, 25(4): 64-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	丁璇, 袁坤, 曹建华, 等. 嫁接树砧穗互作研究进展[J]. 热带农业科学, 2010, 30(5): 68-71.
	DING X, YUAN K, CAO J H, et al. Research progress on interaction between rootstock and scion[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2010, 30(5): 68-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	曹玥华, 魏灵珠, 沈碧薇, 等. 砧木对新郁葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 908-914.
	CAO Y H, WEI L Z, SHEN B W, et al. Effects of rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Xinyu grape[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31(6): 908-914. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	GHEORGHII C, ALIONA M, GICA G. Aspects of grafting influence on carbon and nitrogen movement of several pear (Pyrus sativa) cultivars[J]. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 2009, 37(2): 134-138.
[20]	HOSSEIN D G, FARAJOLLAH S, HASSANPOUR H. Identification of graft incompatibility of pear cultivars on quince rootstock by using isozymes banding pattern and starch[J]. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2007, 7(1): 109-112. DOI URL
[21]	ALONI B, COHEN R, KARNI L, et al. Hormonal signaling in rootstock-scion interactions[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 127(2): 119-126. DOI URL
[22]	YUAN. Proteome analysis of interaction between rootstocks and scions in Hevea brasiliensis[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(66): 14816-14825.
[23]	TOMBESI S, JOHNSON R S, DAY K R, et al. Interactions between rootstock, inter-stem and scion xylem vessel characteristics of peach trees growing on rootstocks with contrasting size-controlling characteristics[J]. AoB PLANTS, 2010, DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plq013. DOI
[24]	MUSACCHI S, PAGLIUCA G, KINDT M, et al. Flavonoids as markers for pear-quince graft incompatibility[J]. Journal of Applied Botany, 2000, 74: 206-211.
[25]	USENIK V, KRŠKA B, VIČAN M, et al. Early detection of graft incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) using phenol analyses[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2006, 109(4): 332-338. DOI URL

中间砧 Interstocks	株高 Plant height/cm	新梢 Shoots
中间砧 Interstocks	株高 Plant height/cm	长度 Length/cm	节间长 Internode length/cm	叶数 Leaf number	叶卷曲度 Leaf curl
E6-3	247.7±6.7	47.9±5.8	4.7±0.7	15.0±1.5	3.7±0.4
E6-5	264.9±3.2	40.2±3.0	5.3±0.5	14.0±2.0	3.7±0.4
E6-7	279.0±16.7	38.3±6.6	5.1±0.4	12.7±0.8	3.7±0.4
E6-16	243.9±5.9	54.0±1.5	4.5±0.3	14.5±2.1	4.0±0.1
E6-22	254.0±21.2	57.0±4.5	4.8±0.4	15.5±1.1	3.5±0.3
E6-42	259.1±4.6	45.6±3.8	4.7±0.2	14.7±1.1	3.0±0.7
E6-50	222.2±26.3	53.8±4.4	4.3±0.5	20.7±0.8	2.0±0.7
K1	230.4±11.2	41.4±5.9	4.2±0.2	13.5±1.1	3.5±0.3
K2	219.2±18.1	48.2±3.4	4.2±0.5	15.0±2.0	3.0±0.1
K3	273.2±14.0	40.3±0.5	4.5±0.3	14.5±1.1	3.0±0.1
K4	233.6±3.5	41.1±5.5	3.7±0.5	14.3±1.5	3.0±0.1
K6	201.0±6.8	40.8±4.7	3.9±0.3	13.5±0.3	3.0±0.1
K7	262.8±20.6	47.8±7.5	4.4±0.4	17.0±2.2	4.0±0.1
K8	250.0±7.6	46.8±3.2	4.6±0.4	12.0±0.7	3.0±0.7
K9	282.0±6.1	44.8±6.6	3.9±0.3	13.5±1.1	2.5±0.3
K10	216.0±9.2	47.5±2.8	4.0±0.4	16.0±0.7	2.0±0.1
K11	209.9±20.7	47.7±4.1	4.4±0.5	17.3±2.2	2.0±0.1
S2	225.1±23.0	45.8±4.0	4.7±0.6	14.0±0.8	3.3±0.8
OHF51	232.5±5.8	41.9±3.0	4.6±0.4	12.7±1.2	4.0±0.1
OHF40	204.5±8.2	52.5±5.6	4.2±0.6	13.0±0.7	2.3±0.4
OHF333	201.3±8.8	42.1±4.9	4.0±1.2	13.7±1.9	2.5±0.3
OHF97	201.3±12.9	40.1±3.4	4.0±0.4	15.3±0.7	2.7±0.4
BA29	184.5±14.3	43.5±2.5	4.2±0.1	13.5±3.0	2.5±0.1

中间砧 Interstocks	株高 Plant height/cm	新梢 Shoots
中间砧 Interstocks	株高 Plant height/cm	长度 Length/cm	节间长 Internode length/cm	叶数 Leaf number	叶卷曲度 Leaf curl
E6-3	247.7±6.7	47.9±5.8	4.7±0.7	15.0±1.5	3.7±0.4
E6-5	264.9±3.2	40.2±3.0	5.3±0.5	14.0±2.0	3.7±0.4
E6-7	279.0±16.7	38.3±6.6	5.1±0.4	12.7±0.8	3.7±0.4
E6-16	243.9±5.9	54.0±1.5	4.5±0.3	14.5±2.1	4.0±0.1
E6-22	254.0±21.2	57.0±4.5	4.8±0.4	15.5±1.1	3.5±0.3
E6-42	259.1±4.6	45.6±3.8	4.7±0.2	14.7±1.1	3.0±0.7
E6-50	222.2±26.3	53.8±4.4	4.3±0.5	20.7±0.8	2.0±0.7
K1	230.4±11.2	41.4±5.9	4.2±0.2	13.5±1.1	3.5±0.3
K2	219.2±18.1	48.2±3.4	4.2±0.5	15.0±2.0	3.0±0.1
K3	273.2±14.0	40.3±0.5	4.5±0.3	14.5±1.1	3.0±0.1
K4	233.6±3.5	41.1±5.5	3.7±0.5	14.3±1.5	3.0±0.1
K6	201.0±6.8	40.8±4.7	3.9±0.3	13.5±0.3	3.0±0.1
K7	262.8±20.6	47.8±7.5	4.4±0.4	17.0±2.2	4.0±0.1
K8	250.0±7.6	46.8±3.2	4.6±0.4	12.0±0.7	3.0±0.7
K9	282.0±6.1	44.8±6.6	3.9±0.3	13.5±1.1	2.5±0.3
K10	216.0±9.2	47.5±2.8	4.0±0.4	16.0±0.7	2.0±0.1
K11	209.9±20.7	47.7±4.1	4.4±0.5	17.3±2.2	2.0±0.1
S2	225.1±23.0	45.8±4.0	4.7±0.6	14.0±0.8	3.3±0.8
OHF51	232.5±5.8	41.9±3.0	4.6±0.4	12.7±1.2	4.0±0.1
OHF40	204.5±8.2	52.5±5.6	4.2±0.6	13.0±0.7	2.3±0.4
OHF333	201.3±8.8	42.1±4.9	4.0±1.2	13.7±1.9	2.5±0.3
OHF97	201.3±12.9	40.1±3.4	4.0±0.4	15.3±0.7	2.7±0.4
BA29	184.5±14.3	43.5±2.5	4.2±0.1	13.5±3.0	2.5±0.1

中间砧 Interstocks	周长Circumference/cm					嫁接亲和性Graft compatibility
中间砧 Interstocks	基砧 Base stock	下接口 Lower graft union	中间砧Interstock	上接口 Upper graft union	接穗 Scion	B/C	D/E	A/C	C/E
E6-3	10.9±0.8	11.1±0.3	7.9±0.3	13.1±1.1	5.8±0.4	1.4±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.4±0.1	1.4±0.1
E6-5	10.5±0.7	10.9±0.6	7.9±0.3	13.3±0.5	5.7±0.2	1.4±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.3±0.1	1.4±0.1
E6-7	8.4±0.5	9.6±0.5	7.3±0.6	11.4±0.6	5.7±0.3	1.3±0.2	2.0±0.2	1.2±0.1	1.3±0.1
E6-16	9.9±0.3	10.9±0.7	7.2±0.3	12.6±0.5	5.6±0.4	1.5±0.1	2.2±0.3	1.4±0.1	1.3±0.1
E6-22	12.0±1.9	10.3±1.6	6.3±0.7	12.3±0.3	5.7±0.6	1.6±0.1	2.2±0.1	1.9±0.1	1.1±0.1
E6-42	12.8±0.3	13.4±0.2	9.2±0.4	14.8±0.8	6.0±0.1	1.5±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.1
E6-50	9.1±0.9	9.8±1.1	7.8±1.2	11.4±1.5	5.0±0.6	1.3±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.6±0.1
K1	10.1±0.6	11.5±0.5	8.4±0.5	9.7±0.6	6.9±0.2	1.4±0.2	1.4±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.2±0.1
K2	9.8±0.4	11.0±0.7	5.6±0.5	10.1±0.4	7.0±0.4	1.3±1.2	1.4±0.1	1.8±1.2	0.8±0.3
K3	10.2±0.5	12.0±0.4	8.5±0.3	11.2±0.6	6.9±0.5	1.4±0.0	1.6±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.2±0.1
K4	9.5±0.6	10.0±1.2	8.7±0.2	11.2±0.8	6.6±0.3	1.2±0.1	1.7±0.2	1.1±0.1	1.3±0.1
K6	8.4±0.4	9.4±0.8	7.3±0.6	9.2±0.7	6.5±0.5	1.3±0.2	1.4±0.2	1.2±0.1	1.1±0.1
K7	9.7±0.1	12.3±0.2	9.3±0.2	10.3±0.2	6.7±0.2	1.3±0.0	1.5±0.1	1.0±0.0	1.4±0.1
K8	9.1±0.8	11.8±0.6	8.3±0.2	10.3±1.1	6.9±0.2	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.1	1.1±0.1	1.2±0.1
K9	10.3±0.5	11.8±0.7	8.7±0.3	10.3±0.2	6.9±0.1	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.3±0.1
K10	8.1±0.6	8.3±0.4	7.6±0.9	8.8±0.5	6.3±0.6	1.1±0.2	1.4±0.2	1.1±0.2	1.2±0.1
K11	10.1±0.4	11.1±0.8	8.0±1.2	9.5±1.4	6.0±0.4	1.4±0.3	1.6±0.2	1.3±0.2	1.3±0.1
S2	8.2±0.6	9.9±0.5	8.0±0.7	8.8±0.4	5.8±0.2	1.2±0.1	1.5±0.1	1.0±0.1	1.4±0.1
OHF51	9.1±0.4	11.2±0.6	8.3±0.1	9.5±0.4	6.2±0.3	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.0	1.1±0.1	1.3±0.1
OHF40	7.7±0.8	13.9±1.1	9.2±0.7	13.0±0.4	5.8±0.2	1.5±0.2	1.9±0.1	0.8±0.1	1.6±0.1
OHF333	8.7±1.2	10.8±0.9	8.5±0.3	11.5±1.0	5.5±0.2	1.3±0.1	1.8±0.2	1.0±0.2	1.6±0.1
OHF97	8.5±0.4	10.5±0.8	7.6±1.0	7.6±1.1	5.3±0.6	1.4±0.1	1.6±0.1	1.1±0.2	1.4±0.1
BA29	6.7±0.3	11.8±0.8	8.0±0.5	9.6±0.7	9.6±0.5	1.5±0.2	1.0±0.3	0.8±0.1	0.8±0.1

中间砧 Interstocks	周长Circumference/cm					嫁接亲和性Graft compatibility
中间砧 Interstocks	基砧 Base stock	下接口 Lower graft union	中间砧Interstock	上接口 Upper graft union	接穗 Scion	B/C	D/E	A/C	C/E
E6-3	10.9±0.8	11.1±0.3	7.9±0.3	13.1±1.1	5.8±0.4	1.4±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.4±0.1	1.4±0.1
E6-5	10.5±0.7	10.9±0.6	7.9±0.3	13.3±0.5	5.7±0.2	1.4±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.3±0.1	1.4±0.1
E6-7	8.4±0.5	9.6±0.5	7.3±0.6	11.4±0.6	5.7±0.3	1.3±0.2	2.0±0.2	1.2±0.1	1.3±0.1
E6-16	9.9±0.3	10.9±0.7	7.2±0.3	12.6±0.5	5.6±0.4	1.5±0.1	2.2±0.3	1.4±0.1	1.3±0.1
E6-22	12.0±1.9	10.3±1.6	6.3±0.7	12.3±0.3	5.7±0.6	1.6±0.1	2.2±0.1	1.9±0.1	1.1±0.1
E6-42	12.8±0.3	13.4±0.2	9.2±0.4	14.8±0.8	6.0±0.1	1.5±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.1
E6-50	9.1±0.9	9.8±1.1	7.8±1.2	11.4±1.5	5.0±0.6	1.3±0.1	2.3±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.6±0.1
K1	10.1±0.6	11.5±0.5	8.4±0.5	9.7±0.6	6.9±0.2	1.4±0.2	1.4±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.2±0.1
K2	9.8±0.4	11.0±0.7	5.6±0.5	10.1±0.4	7.0±0.4	1.3±1.2	1.4±0.1	1.8±1.2	0.8±0.3
K3	10.2±0.5	12.0±0.4	8.5±0.3	11.2±0.6	6.9±0.5	1.4±0.0	1.6±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.2±0.1
K4	9.5±0.6	10.0±1.2	8.7±0.2	11.2±0.8	6.6±0.3	1.2±0.1	1.7±0.2	1.1±0.1	1.3±0.1
K6	8.4±0.4	9.4±0.8	7.3±0.6	9.2±0.7	6.5±0.5	1.3±0.2	1.4±0.2	1.2±0.1	1.1±0.1
K7	9.7±0.1	12.3±0.2	9.3±0.2	10.3±0.2	6.7±0.2	1.3±0.0	1.5±0.1	1.0±0.0	1.4±0.1
K8	9.1±0.8	11.8±0.6	8.3±0.2	10.3±1.1	6.9±0.2	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.1	1.1±0.1	1.2±0.1
K9	10.3±0.5	11.8±0.7	8.7±0.3	10.3±0.2	6.9±0.1	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.1	1.2±0.1	1.3±0.1
K10	8.1±0.6	8.3±0.4	7.6±0.9	8.8±0.5	6.3±0.6	1.1±0.2	1.4±0.2	1.1±0.2	1.2±0.1
K11	10.1±0.4	11.1±0.8	8.0±1.2	9.5±1.4	6.0±0.4	1.4±0.3	1.6±0.2	1.3±0.2	1.3±0.1
S2	8.2±0.6	9.9±0.5	8.0±0.7	8.8±0.4	5.8±0.2	1.2±0.1	1.5±0.1	1.0±0.1	1.4±0.1
OHF51	9.1±0.4	11.2±0.6	8.3±0.1	9.5±0.4	6.2±0.3	1.4±0.1	1.5±0.0	1.1±0.1	1.3±0.1
OHF40	7.7±0.8	13.9±1.1	9.2±0.7	13.0±0.4	5.8±0.2	1.5±0.2	1.9±0.1	0.8±0.1	1.6±0.1
OHF333	8.7±1.2	10.8±0.9	8.5±0.3	11.5±1.0	5.5±0.2	1.3±0.1	1.8±0.2	1.0±0.2	1.6±0.1
OHF97	8.5±0.4	10.5±0.8	7.6±1.0	7.6±1.1	5.3±0.6	1.4±0.1	1.6±0.1	1.1±0.2	1.4±0.1
BA29	6.7±0.3	11.8±0.8	8.0±0.5	9.6±0.7	9.6±0.5	1.5±0.2	1.0±0.3	0.8±0.1	0.8±0.1

不同矮化中间砧对黄金梨树体生长的影响及嫁接亲和性相关性分析

Effects of different dwarfing interstocks on Whangkumbae pear growth and correlation analysis of graft-compatibility

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱诗君, 金树权, 姚红燕, 徐志豪, 罗幼君, 陈若霞. 不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226.
[2]	李虹桥, 赖莹, 母娜, 严红梅, 汤维群, 蒋小灵, 高雯, 吴永成. 密度对不同株高油菜冠层结构与群体光合能力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 419-427.
[3]	赵龙龙, 卫洁, 谢映平, 李捷. 中国梨木虱翅型变化及其影响因素初探[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 120-127.
[4]	吴嘉维, 姚张良, 胡琪琪, 张杰, 陈轶, 蒋建荣, 周国鑫, 王霞. 浙北桐乡梨锈病防治适期和防治药剂研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1668-1675.
[5]	王士臻, 王教瑜, 王艳丽, 孙国仓. 麦瘟病与小麦抗麦瘟基因研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2205-2212.
[6]	邱晓红, 郑路敏, 褚姝频, 朱友理. 桃园3种蛀果害虫雄成虫动态及其与气温和降雨量相关性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 469-474.
[7]	李刚波, 张梅, 樊继德, 赵林, 张婷, 蔺经, 常有宏, 杨峰. 徐淮地区避雨栽培对早熟砂梨果实糖积累和营养生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 900-907.
[8]	徐锴, 赵德英, 袁继存, 闫帅, 张少瑜. 不同果袋对红色梨果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 2011-2018.
[9]	汪峰, 谌江华, 孙梅梅, 柴伟纲, 姚红燕, 戴瑶璐, 张玉屏, 朱德峰, 陈若霞. 甬优系列籼粳杂交稻株高变化对氮素利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(1): 1-10.
[10]	李刚波, 樊继德, 赵林, 张婷, 张梅, 杨艳, 杨峰. 五种套袋对早熟梨果实糖酸和毒死蜱农药残留的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1363-1368.
[11]	方敏彦, 章明, 李佳, 孔维亮, 戴丹, 王山中. 四种空气凤梨叶片表皮解剖结构与功能的关系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 959-965.
[12]	徐锴, 张少瑜, 袁继存, 闫帅, 侯桂学, 赵德英. 地膜和秸秆覆盖对梨园土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(3): 421-427.
[13]	尹明华, 周宇瑶, 杨星鹏, 徐玉琴, 刘郑英, 舒荣建, 魏志敏, 夏华炎, 洪森荣. 上饶早梨主栽品种病毒种类分析及其茎尖脱毒技术效率比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(1): 89-100.
[14]	余欢1，2，姜华2，王艳丽2，孙国昌2，*. 无毒基因在不同寄主梨孢菌中的变异研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(8): 1414-.
[15]	李洪涛，王军，张灿宏，迟铭，王多明，胡冰. 大麦株高及其构成因素的杂种优势和配合力分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(2): 141-.