不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.06.12

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1217-1226.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.06.12

不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响

朱诗君¹(), 金树权¹, 姚红燕¹, 徐志豪¹, 罗幼君², 陈若霞^*()

1.宁波市农业科学研究院,浙江宁波 315101
2.宁波市海和诗现代农业科技有限公司,浙江宁波 315035

收稿日期:2022-03-10 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-06-30
通讯作者: 陈若霞
作者简介:*陈若霞,E-mail: crx900@163.com
朱诗君（1991—）,男,浙江温州人,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为农业微生物资源开发与应用。E-mail: 1227935418@qq.com

Effects of different basal fertilizers and topdressing fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of pineapple

ZHU Shijun¹(), JIN Shuquan¹, YAO Hongyan¹, XU Zhihao¹, LUO Youjun², CHEN Ruoxia^*()

1. Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ningbo 315101, Zhejiang, China
2. Ningbo Haiheshi Modern Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315035, Zhejiang, China

Received:2022-03-10 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-06-30
Contact: CHEN Ruoxia

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量及果实品质的影响,以台农17凤梨为研究对象,分别设基肥试验和追肥试验,明确最佳的凤梨施肥模式。基肥试验设复合肥、“劲久”控释肥、羊粪+复合肥和“沃丰康”生物有机肥+复合肥4种肥料组合,每种组合根据总氮含量设100% N、75% N与50% N三种梯度,其中不添加基肥为CK1,共计13个基肥处理。追肥试验设T1（促花肥+开花肥+结果肥）、T2（开花肥+结果肥）、T3（促花肥+结果肥）,其中不施用追肥为CK2,共4个追肥处理。结果表明,在100% N水平下,以11 250 kg·hm^-2羊粪+1 875 kg·hm^-2复合肥作为基肥,凤梨的生长、产量及果实品质最佳。移栽135 d后,凤梨的叶尖高度增加了28.25%,总叶片数增加59.09%,最大叶长增加16.00%,最大叶宽增加42.55%。凤梨产量达58.62 t·hm^-2,较CK1增加20.22%,平均单果重达（1.86±0.32）kg, 果长、果径与芯径分别达（231.47±44.28）mm、（125.62±33.24）mm和（41.16±4.13）mm。此外凤梨的果实品质也最佳,果肉可溶性固形物达（12.6±0.4）%,可滴定酸达（0.50±0.11）%,维生素C达（29.1±6.7）mg·kg^-1。而在75%N水平或50%N水平下,“沃丰康”生物有机肥+复合肥处理的部分凤梨指标更佳。作为追肥,T1的效果最佳,较于追肥前,追肥后的凤梨叶尖高度、总叶片数、最大叶长叶宽分别增加20.18%、184.87%、21.95%和61.25%,产量较CK2增加6.62%。凤梨单果重（1.62±0.33）kg,果长、果径和芯径分别达（183.52±29.35）mm、（123.58±15.68）mm和（40.58±8.39）mm。凤梨果肉可溶性固形物（13.1±0.9）%,可滴定酸（0.47±0.12）%,维生素C含量（28.9±3.2）mg·kg^-1。本研究表明,适用于宁波本地凤梨的最佳施肥方式为以11 250 kg·hm^-2羊粪+1 875 kg·hm^-2复合肥作为基肥,同时添加少量生物有机肥,并辅以促花肥、开花肥和结果肥追施。

关键词: 凤梨, 基肥, 追肥, 产量, 有机肥

Abstract:

To clarify the effects of different basal fertilizers and topdressing fertilizers on the growth, yield and fruit quality of pineapples in Ningbo, Tainong 17 was selected as the material, and the basal fertilizer experiments and topdressing fertilizer experiments were carried out respectively to determine the best fertilization mode for pineapple. Four fertilizer treatments of NPK compound fertilizer, “Jinjiu”controlled release fertilizer, sheep excreta+NPK compound fertilizer, “Wofengkang” biological organic fertilizer+NPK compound fertilizer, with three gradients of 100% N, 75% N and 50% N were set up for basal fertilizer experiment. And control treatment CK1 with no basal fertilizer applied was added. A total of 4 treatments including T1 (flower-promoting fertilizer + flowering fertilizer + fruiting fertilizer), T2 (flowering fertilizer + fruiting fertilizer), T3 (flower-promoting fertilizer + fruiting fertilizer) and control treatment CK2 were carried out in topdressing fertilizer experiments. The results showed that the growth, yield and fruit quality of pineapple with 11 250 kg·hm^-2 sheep excreta+1 875 kg·hm^-2 NPK compound fertilizer applied were the best. Based on the data of 135 days after transplanting, the leaf tip height of pineapple increased by 28.25%, number of leaves increased by 59.09%, the maximum leaf length and width increased by 16.00% and 42.55%, respectively. The yield of pineapple was 58.62 t·hm^-2, with increase of 20.22% compared with CK1. Average fruit weight was (1.86±0.32) kg, fruit length and diameter of fruit and core were (231.47±44.28) mm, (125.62±33.24) mm and (41.16±4.13) mm, respectively. In addition, fruit quality of the treatment was also better than other treatment. The value of soluble solids was (12.6±0.4)%, titratable acid was (0.50±0.11)%, and of vitamin C was (29.1±6.7) mg·kg^-1. Furthermore, At 75% N level or 50% N level, some better indicators were observed in the treatment of “Wofengkang” bio-organic fertilizer + NPK compound fertilizer. As top dressing fertilizer part, various pineapple indexes of T1 treatment were higher than other treatments. Leaf tip height, total number of leaves, maximum leaf length and width after top dressing increased by 20.18%, 184.87%, 21.95% and 61.25% respectively, comparing with that before fertilizer applied. And the yield increased by 6.62% compared with CK2. Average fruit weight was (1.62±0.33) kg, and fruit length and diameter of fruit and core were (183.52±29.35) mm, (123.58±15.68) mm and (40.58±8.39) mm, respectively. Soluble solids of pineapple was (13.1±0.9)%, titratable acid was (0.47±0.12)%, and vitamin C was (28.9±3.2) mg·kg^-1. This study showed the best fertilization methods for native pineapples in Ningbo: 11 250 kg·hm^-2 sheep manure + 1 875 kg·hm^-2 NPK compound fertilizer as basal fertilizer, with some bio-organic fertilizer added, and flower-promoting fertilizer, flowering fertilizer and fruiting fertilizer top-dressed.

Key words: pineapple, basal fertilizer, top dressing, yield, organic fertilizer

中图分类号:

S668.3

朱诗君, 金树权, 姚红燕, 徐志豪, 罗幼君, 陈若霞. 不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226.

ZHU Shijun, JIN Shuquan, YAO Hongyan, XU Zhihao, LUO Youjun, CHEN Ruoxia. Effects of different basal fertilizers and topdressing fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of pineapple[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226.

图/表 6

参考文献 32

[1]	ALIA M M, HASHIMA N, ABD AZIZA S, et al.. An overview of non-destructive approaches for quality determination in pineapples[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Engineering, 2020, 1(1): 1-7.
[2]	MOHD ALI M, HASHIM N, ABD AZIZ S, et al. Pineapple (Ananas comosus): a comprehensive review of nutritional values, volatile compounds, health benefits, and potential food products[J]. Food Research International, 2020, 137: 109675.
[3]	李炳韵, 程云飞, 唐浩真, 等. 配施生物有机肥与无机肥对连作菠萝土壤的影响[J]. 热带生物学报, 2021, 12(2): 192-201.
	LI B Y, CHENG Y F, TANG H Z, et al. Effects of organic, bio-organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil nutrients and yield of pineapple plantation under continuous cropping[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2021, 12(2): 192-201. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	郭继阳, 张汉卿, 杨越, 等. 基于因子-聚类分析的菠萝园土壤养分状况评价[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(1): 137-143.
	GUO J Y, ZHANG H Q, YANG Y, et al. Soil nutrient evaluation of pineapple orchards based on factor and cluster analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 50(1): 137-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	MIN J, ZHAO X, SHI W M, et al. Nitrogen balance and loss in a greenhouse vegetable system in southeastern China[J]. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(4): 464-472. DOI URL
[6]	刘金山, 戴健, 刘洋, 等. 过量施氮对旱地土壤碳、氮及供氮能力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(1): 112-120.
	LIU J S, DAI J, LIU Y, et al. Effects of excessive nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon and nitrogen and nitrogen supply capacity in dryland[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(1): 112-120. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	董龙, 蔡昭艳, 韦巧云, 等. 有机肥对“台农16号”菠萝生长、产量及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2021, 50(1): 46-49.
	DONG L, CAI Z Y, WEI Q Y, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer on growth, yield and fruit quality of "Tainong No. 16" pineapple[J]. South China Fruits, 2021, 50(1): 46-49. (in Chinese)
[8]	符春敏, 尹黎燕, 邓燕, 等. 施肥模式对菠萝产量及农田氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 热带生物学报, 2020, 11(3): 331-340.
	FU C M, YIN L Y, DENG Y, et al. Effects of fertilizer application on pineapple yield and nitrous oxide emission from the pineapple field[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2020, 11(3): 331-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	唐浩真, 胡英宏, 任泽广, 等. 不同生物有机肥对连作菠萝生长及防控心腐病效果[J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(11): 4156-4166.
	TANG H Z, HU Y H, REN Z G, et al. Effect of different biological organic fertilizers on the growth of pineapple under continuous cropping and the heart rot[J]. Microbiology China, 2021, 48(11): 4156-4166. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	牛英, 范七君, 刘冰浩, 等. 柑桔果汁可溶性固形物含量测定的影响因素及优化[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(7): 3-6.
	NIU Y, FAN Q J, LIU B H, et al. Influencing factors and optimization of measurement of soluble solid in citrus juice[J]. Modern Horticulture, 2021, 44(7): 3-6. (in Chinese)
[11]	郭静, 伏芳, 高同雨, 等. ‘京白梨’优质果实的评价指标分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(1): 79-95.
	GUO J, FU F, GAO T Y, et al. Analysis on evaluation index of high quality Pyrus ussuriensis ‘Jingbaili'fruits[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022, 27(1): 79-95. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	周柳强, 张肇元, 黄美福, 等. 菠萝的营养特性及平衡施肥研究[J]. 土壤, 1994, 26(1): 43-47.
	ZHOU L Q, ZHANG Z Y, HUANG M F, et al. Study on nutritional characteristics and balanced fertilization of pineapple[J]. Soils, 1994, 26(1): 43-47. (in Chinese)
[13]	张汉卿, 卢明, 邓燕, 等. 香水菠萝氮磷钾施肥效应和适宜施用量[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(6): 1619-1624.
	ZHANG H Q, LU M, DENG Y, et al. Effect of NPK fertilization on yield and fertilization recommendation for ‘Tainong no. 11' pineapple[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(6): 1619-1624. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	韦巧云, 徐健, 王小媚, 等. 不同施氮水平对‘台农16号’菠萝生长、果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2019(3): 71-73.
	WEI Q Y, XU J, WANG X M, et al. Effects of different nitrogen levels on growth, fruit quality and yield of ‘Tainong16' pineapple[J]. China Fruits, 2019(3): 71-73. (in Chinese)
[15]	张江周, 严程明, 刘亚男, 等. 不同施肥量对菠萝产量和品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014, 35(5): 837-841.
	ZHANG J Z, YAN C M, LIU Y N, et al. Effects of different fertilizer application rates on yield and quality of pineapple[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2014, 35(5): 837-841. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	马海洋, 石伟琦, 刘亚男, 等. 氮、磷、钾肥对卡因菠萝产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4): 901-907.
	MA H Y, SHI W Q, LIU Y N, et al. Influence of N, P, K fertilization on yield and quality of Smooth Cayenne pineapple[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(4): 901-907. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	梁李宏, 王金辉, 黄伟坚, 等. 氮磷钾肥对香水菠萝产量和品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(10): 1743-1747.
	LIANG L H, WANG J H, HUANG W J, et al. Effect of N, P, K fertilizer application rates on yield and quality of tainung No.11 pineapple[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(10): 1743-1747. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	姜海斌, 张克强, 沈仕洲, 等. 洱海流域减氮施肥条件下水稻产量和土壤剖面氮磷变化特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(1): 23-32.
	JIANG H B, ZHANG K Q, SHEN S Z, et al. Rice yield and nitrogen and phosphorus changes in soil profile under different fertilization strategies in Erhai Lake Basin, Yunnan[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(1): 23-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	曲均峰. 控释掺混肥在菠萝生产中的应用研究[J]. 化肥工业, 2018, 45(6): 70-73.
	QU J F. Study of application of controlled release bulk blended fertilizer in pineapple production[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2018, 45(6): 70-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	刘传和, 刘岩, 易干军, 等. 不同有机肥影响菠萝生长的生理生化机制[J]. 西北植物学报, 2009, 29(12): 2527-2534.
	LIU C H, LIU Y, YI G J, et al. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of different organic fertilizer applications affecting pineapple plant growth[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2009, 29(12): 2527-2534. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	GONG W, YAN X Y, WANG J Y, et al. Long-term manure and fertilizer effects on soil organic matter fractions and microbes under a wheat-maize cropping system in Northern China[J]. Geoderma, 2009, 149(3/4): 318-324. DOI URL
[22]	吕卫光, 黄启为, 沈其荣, 等. 不同来源有机肥及有机肥与无机肥混施对西瓜生长期土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2005, 28(4): 68-71.
	LYU W G, HUANG Q W, SHEN Q R, et al. The effect of organic fertilizer and organic-inorganic fertilizer application on soil enzymes activities during watermelon growing period[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2005, 28(4): 68-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	夏昕, 石坤, 黄欠如, 等. 长期不同施肥条件下红壤性水稻土微生物群落结构的变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(3): 697-705.
	XIA X, SHI K, HUANG Q R, et al. The changes of microbial community structure in red paddy soil under long-term fertilization[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(3): 697-705. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	李书田, 刘荣乐, 陕红. 我国主要畜禽粪便养分含量及变化分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(1): 179-184.
	LI S T, LIU R L, SHAN H. Nutrient contents in main animal manures in China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009, 28(1): 179-184. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	范丙全. 我国生物肥料研究与应用进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1602-1613.
	FAN B Q. Advances in biofertilizer research and development in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(6): 1602-1613. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	何欣, 郝文雅, 杨兴明, 等. 生物有机肥对香蕉植株生长和香蕉枯萎病防治的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(4): 978-985.
	HE X, HAO W Y, YANG X M, et al. Effects of bioorganic fertilization on growth and controlling Fusarium-wilt disease of banana[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(4): 978-985. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	胡英宏, 任泽广, 杨姝钰, 等. 生物有机肥对菠萝心腐病发生和土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2022, 28(4):1-10.
	HU Y H, REN Z G, YANG Z Y, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizers on pineapple heart rot and bacterial community structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2022, 28(4):1-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	张国桥, 王静, 刘涛, 等. 水肥一体化施磷对滴灌玉米产量、磷素营养及磷肥利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(5): 1103-1109.
	ZHANG G Q, WANG J, LIU T, et al. Effect of water and P fertilizer coupling on corn yield, P uptake, and P utilization efficiency with drip irrigation in a calcareous soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(5): 1103-1109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	石玉, 于振文, 王东, 等. 施氮量和底追比例对小麦氮素吸收转运及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12): 1860-1866.
	SHI Y, YU Z W, WANG D, et al. Effects of nitrogen rate and ratio of base fertilizer and topdressing on uptake, translocation of nitrogen and yield in wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(12): 1860-1866. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	张兴旺. 菠萝的需肥特性和施肥要点[J]. 农村实用技术, 2004(3): 26-27.
	ZHANG X W. The fertilizer requirements and the main points of fertilization of pineapple[J]. Applicable Technologies for Rural Areas, 2004(3): 26-27. (in Chinese)
[31]	严程明, 张江周, 石伟琦, 等. 滴灌施肥下菠萝氮磷钾的营养特性[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014, 35(9): 1688-1694.
	YAN C M, ZHANG J Z, SHI W Q, et al. Nutritional characteristics of NPK of pineapple under drip fertigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2014, 35(9): 1688-1694. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	石伟琦, 孙光明, 陆新华, 等. 分次施氮对菠萝产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(6): 1524-1529.
	SHI W Q, SUN G M, LU X H, et al. Effects of split application of nitrogen on yield and quality of pineapple[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(6): 1524-1529. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理Treatment	叶尖高度 Tip height		叶片数 Number of leaves		最大叶尺寸 Size of the largest leaf				产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK1增产Increase in production compared with CK1/%
处理Treatment	株高Height/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶片数 Number of leaves	变化率Rate of change/%	叶长 Leaf length/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶宽 Leaf width/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK1增产Increase in production compared with CK1/%
CK1	51.18±7.48 b	1.74	18.3±1.8 b	19.02	53.40±0.84 b	1.33	4.47±0.21 b	13.45	48.76	—
F1	71.44±5.42 a	14.43	25.3±4.1 a	39.18	68.20±4.55 a	12.39	6.07±0.58 a	47.33	56.34	15.55
F2	64.94±5.16 b	4.52	38.0±3.3 a	61.02	67.23±6.78 a	8.02	5.03±0.42 a	10.31	53.15	9.00
F3	58.06±6.75 b	1.86	21.7±1.2 b	44.47	66.37±1.96 a	18.48	5.77±0.33 a	19.21	51.21	5.02
J1	69.02±2.21 a	9.09	30.7±2.9 a	33.35	67.30±2.65 a	11.17	5.77±0.46 a	22.25	52.83	8.35
J2	66.20±6.70 a	2.48	28.7±2.9 a	35.24	69.17±2.80 a	10.67	6.00±0.59 a	22.95	51.98	6.60
J3	59.48±5.10 b	1.68	27.3±28.8 a	43.84	57.53±4.91 a	8.92	5.47±0.74 a	19.96	49.20	0.90
YF1	63.85±2.70 b	28.25	28.0±2.7 a	59.09	28.0±2.70 a	16.00	5.93±0.50 a	42.55	58.62	20.22
YF2	58.62±5.32 b	13.60	27.7±2.2 a	50.80	27.7±2.20 a	7.58	5.37±0.12 a	42.86	55.33	13.47
YF3	62.26±7.44 b	7.16	23.7±2.2 b	49.81	23.7±2.22 b	6.45	5.00±0.08 a	13.29	53.61	9.95
WF1	70.40±4.31 a	22.58	32.0±3.0 a	60.00	32.0±3.00 a	5.84	4.53±0.21 b	33.51	58.14	19.24
WF2	62.44±6.22 b	16.86	27.0±2.7 a	50.00	27.0±2.75 a	15.43	5.10±0.08 a	31.68	56.67	16.22
WF3	62.64±3.53 b	6.95	30.3±1.4 a	29.62	30.3±1.40 a	9.56	5.03±0.87 a	13.25	54.91	12.61

处理Treatment	叶尖高度 Tip height		叶片数 Number of leaves		最大叶尺寸 Size of the largest leaf				产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK1增产Increase in production compared with CK1/%
处理Treatment	株高Height/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶片数 Number of leaves	变化率Rate of change/%	叶长 Leaf length/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶宽 Leaf width/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK1增产Increase in production compared with CK1/%
CK1	51.18±7.48 b	1.74	18.3±1.8 b	19.02	53.40±0.84 b	1.33	4.47±0.21 b	13.45	48.76	—
F1	71.44±5.42 a	14.43	25.3±4.1 a	39.18	68.20±4.55 a	12.39	6.07±0.58 a	47.33	56.34	15.55
F2	64.94±5.16 b	4.52	38.0±3.3 a	61.02	67.23±6.78 a	8.02	5.03±0.42 a	10.31	53.15	9.00
F3	58.06±6.75 b	1.86	21.7±1.2 b	44.47	66.37±1.96 a	18.48	5.77±0.33 a	19.21	51.21	5.02
J1	69.02±2.21 a	9.09	30.7±2.9 a	33.35	67.30±2.65 a	11.17	5.77±0.46 a	22.25	52.83	8.35
J2	66.20±6.70 a	2.48	28.7±2.9 a	35.24	69.17±2.80 a	10.67	6.00±0.59 a	22.95	51.98	6.60
J3	59.48±5.10 b	1.68	27.3±28.8 a	43.84	57.53±4.91 a	8.92	5.47±0.74 a	19.96	49.20	0.90
YF1	63.85±2.70 b	28.25	28.0±2.7 a	59.09	28.0±2.70 a	16.00	5.93±0.50 a	42.55	58.62	20.22
YF2	58.62±5.32 b	13.60	27.7±2.2 a	50.80	27.7±2.20 a	7.58	5.37±0.12 a	42.86	55.33	13.47
YF3	62.26±7.44 b	7.16	23.7±2.2 b	49.81	23.7±2.22 b	6.45	5.00±0.08 a	13.29	53.61	9.95
WF1	70.40±4.31 a	22.58	32.0±3.0 a	60.00	32.0±3.00 a	5.84	4.53±0.21 b	33.51	58.14	19.24
WF2	62.44±6.22 b	16.86	27.0±2.7 a	50.00	27.0±2.75 a	15.43	5.10±0.08 a	31.68	56.67	16.22
WF3	62.64±3.53 b	6.95	30.3±1.4 a	29.62	30.3±1.40 a	9.56	5.03±0.87 a	13.25	54.91	12.61

处理 Treatment	单果重Single fruit weight/kg	果实尺寸Fruit size /mm
处理 Treatment	单果重Single fruit weight/kg	果高Fruit height	直径Fruit diameter	芯径Core diameter
CK1	1.26±0.13	160.32±25.65	111.13±14.38	41.90±2.59
F1	1.62±0.09	198.85±41.38	121.37±11.58	42.30±1.59
F2	1.53±0.14	180.39±54.21	119.78±16.27	40.13±2.57
F3	1.39±0.23	168.68±25.13	113.25±10.35	38.21±3.25
J1	1.57±0.11	196.82±33.58	120.50±14.36	41.90±1.55
J2	1.49±0.27	183.58±48.29	112.57±12.34	40.31±2.26
J3	1.37±0.24	168.62±23.24	109.64±22.27	39.87±3.35
YF1	1.86±0.32	231.47±44.28	125.62±33.24	41.16±4.13
YF2	1.66±0.29	218.57±35.68	120.13±27.16	39.72±3.29
YF3	1.58±0.24	193.52±14.28	118.52±11.37	38.77±2.95
WF1	1.83±0.29	225.93±21.17	124.37±28.15	40.13±3.65
WF2	1.71±0.38	216.39±17.36	121.95±21.08	39.08±4.13
WF3	1.60±0.21	189.27±13.28	117.13±14.26	38.76±1.36

处理 Treatment	单果重Single fruit weight/kg	果实尺寸Fruit size /mm
处理 Treatment	单果重Single fruit weight/kg	果高Fruit height	直径Fruit diameter	芯径Core diameter
CK1	1.26±0.13	160.32±25.65	111.13±14.38	41.90±2.59
F1	1.62±0.09	198.85±41.38	121.37±11.58	42.30±1.59
F2	1.53±0.14	180.39±54.21	119.78±16.27	40.13±2.57
F3	1.39±0.23	168.68±25.13	113.25±10.35	38.21±3.25
J1	1.57±0.11	196.82±33.58	120.50±14.36	41.90±1.55
J2	1.49±0.27	183.58±48.29	112.57±12.34	40.31±2.26
J3	1.37±0.24	168.62±23.24	109.64±22.27	39.87±3.35
YF1	1.86±0.32	231.47±44.28	125.62±33.24	41.16±4.13
YF2	1.66±0.29	218.57±35.68	120.13±27.16	39.72±3.29
YF3	1.58±0.24	193.52±14.28	118.52±11.37	38.77±2.95
WF1	1.83±0.29	225.93±21.17	124.37±28.15	40.13±3.65
WF2	1.71±0.38	216.39±17.36	121.95±21.08	39.08±4.13
WF3	1.60±0.21	189.27±13.28	117.13±14.26	38.76±1.36

处理Treatment	可溶性固形物Soluble solids/%		可滴定酸Titratable acid /%	维生素C Vitamin C/（mg·kg^-1）	水果硬度Fruit firmness/(kg·cm^-2)
处理Treatment	果肉Pulp	果芯Core	可滴定酸Titratable acid /%	维生素C Vitamin C/（mg·kg^-1）	果肉Pulp	果芯Core
CK1	11.1±0.4	6.9±0.4	0.58±0.08	26.9±3.8	2.36±0.00	7.31±0.00
F1	11.9±0.5	7.3±0.3	0.52±0.04	27.8±4.6	2.30±0.01	7.32±0.01
F2	12.0±0.6	7.1±0.2	0.53±0.05	27.3±1.2	2.33±0.05	7.31±0.02
F3	11.5±0.4	7.0±0.1	0.57±0.06	26.8±6.3	2.34±0.04	7.30±0.01
J1	12.3±0.4	7.3±0.1	0.59±0.10	27.9±5.5	2.30±0.07	7.28±0.01
J2	12.0±0.8	7.3±0.3	0.53±0.08	28.3±3.6	2.37±0.08	7.29±0.02
J3	11.9±0.4	7.2±0.4	0.55±0.07	27.1±2.7	2.33±0.02	7.31±0.01
YF1	12.6±0.4	7.2±0.2	0.50±0.11	29.1±6.7	2.34±0.05	7.26±0.02
YF2	12.3±0.7	7.4±0.1	0.48±0.13	28.8±5.2	2.20±0.01	7.28±0.01
YF3	12.2±0.7	7.3±0.2	0.52±0.08	28.3±3.6	2.25±0.04	7.29±0.01
WF1	12.5±0.4	7.3±0.1	0.49±0.07	29.5±3.6	2.27±0.04	7.30±0.02
WF2	12.2±0.7	7.2±0.3	0.51±0.08	29.1±2.8	2.30±0.02	7.30±0.01
WF3	12.3±0.6	7.1±0.2	0.52±0.04	28.8±4.5	2.31±0.01	7.31±0.00

不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响

Effects of different basal fertilizers and topdressing fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of pineapple

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱铭, 刘琛, 林义成, 郭彬, 李华, 傅庆林. 不同调理剂组合对浙江红壤土壤肥力、微生物群落多样性和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1258-1267.
[2]	叶迎, 赵考诚, 马军, 祝轲, 庄恒扬. 播期和施氮量组合对水稻南粳9108产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 879-886.
[3]	胡开博, 杨清夏, 李扬, 吴开贤, 赵平, 龙光强. 化肥减氮配施氨基酸肥料对春玉米生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 661-670.
[4]	王慧茹, 李建设, 闫思华, 高艳明. 整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 525-533.
[5]	袁文雅, 康益晨, 杨昕宇, 张茹艳, 周春涛, 王勇, 陈喜鹏, 余慧芳, 秦舒浩. 清水苜蓿土壤浸提液对连作马铃薯根际土壤环境酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 240-247.
[6]	高鑫, 杨恒山, 张瑞富, 张玉芹, 李锐, 张明伟. 浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产模式下春玉米产量与根冠特征差异性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 1-9.
[7]	王佳, 慕瑞瑞, 杨乔乔, 刘伟, 张月荷, 康建宏. 滴灌水肥一体化下施钾量对宁夏春玉米叶绿素荧光特性与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1347-1357.
[8]	齐振宇, 蔡溧聪, 胡卫珍, 蔡盼, 张龙平, 任艳云, 周艳虹. 水肥一体化模式中化肥减施与不同基追肥比例对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.
[9]	李菊, 颉博杰, 魏守辉, 张国斌, 武玥, 唐中祺, 肖雪梅, 郁继华. 有机肥与化肥配施对松花菜花球营养品质和挥发性物质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1199-1211.
[10]	汪峰, 谌江华, 陈若霞, 史骏, 任少鹏, 金树权, 姚红燕, 朱德峰, 戴瑶璐. 减氮对甬优籼粳杂交稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 984-992.
[11]	李清斌, 秦奔奔, 李盈盈, 范凯锋, 杨栋, 陈磊, 刘鹍. 连阴雨寡日照对大棚草莓小气候、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 831-839.
[12]	厉宝仙, 王保君, 怀燕, 沈亚强, 张红梅, 程旺大. 水稻-红鳌螯虾共作对稻田土壤养分、碳库与稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 688-696.
[13]	岳文俊, 何文学, 丁春梅, 柏宇, 周英杰, 奚辉. 不同滴灌水肥处理对温室甜瓜养分吸收、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2370-2380.
[14]	江涛, 王立国, 孙芳芳, 成剑波, 何腾兵, 秦松, 范成五, 阴文芳. 沼渣生物质炭对西南喀斯特山区沼液灌溉土壤氮淋溶和白菜产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2104-2115.
[15]	徐玥, 胥雅馨, 黄兴军, 吴树, 陈国栋, 吴全忠, 翟云龙. 根瘤菌接种方式对复播大豆干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1808-1816.

处理Treatment	叶尖高度 Tip height		叶片数 Number of leaves		最大叶尺寸 Size of the largest leaf				产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK2增产Increase in production compared with CK2/%
处理Treatment	株高Height/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶片数 Number of leaves	变化率Rate of change/%	叶长 Leaf length/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶宽 Leaf width/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK2增产Increase in production compared with CK2/%
CK2	61.31±2.17	11.09	28.3±1.2 b	165.51	55.64±5.37	15.22	5.03±0.11	45.80	51.23
T1	63.95±4.42	20.18	43.7±2.2 a	184.87	61.11±4.12	21.95	5.16±1.10	61.25	54.62	6.62
T2	66.29±2.86	16.46	37.3±2.7 a	173.08	58.81±3.17	19.46	4.93±0.51	51.69	54.01	5.43
T3	64.12±5.36	18.32	42.0±1.5 a	180.00	63.39±1.29	20.44	5.29±0.62	56.97	53.96	5.33

处理Treatment	叶尖高度 Tip height		叶片数 Number of leaves		最大叶尺寸 Size of the largest leaf				产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK2增产Increase in production compared with CK2/%
处理Treatment	株高Height/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶片数 Number of leaves	变化率Rate of change/%	叶长 Leaf length/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	叶宽 Leaf width/mm	变化率Rate of change/%	产量 Yield/（t·hm^-2）	较CK2增产Increase in production compared with CK2/%
CK2	61.31±2.17	11.09	28.3±1.2 b	165.51	55.64±5.37	15.22	5.03±0.11	45.80	51.23
T1	63.95±4.42	20.18	43.7±2.2 a	184.87	61.11±4.12	21.95	5.16±1.10	61.25	54.62	6.62
T2	66.29±2.86	16.46	37.3±2.7 a	173.08	58.81±3.17	19.46	4.93±0.51	51.69	54.01	5.43
T3	64.12±5.36	18.32	42.0±1.5 a	180.00	63.39±1.29	20.44	5.29±0.62	56.97	53.96	5.33