浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产模式下春玉米产量与根冠特征差异性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.01

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 1-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.01

浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产模式下春玉米产量与根冠特征差异性

高鑫(), 杨恒山^*(), 张瑞富, 张玉芹, 李锐, 张明伟

内蒙古民族大学农学院/内蒙古自治区饲用作物工程中心,内蒙古通辽 028000

收稿日期:2021-04-22 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-02-05
通讯作者: 杨恒山
作者简介:* 杨恒山,E-mail: yanghengshan2003@aliyun.com
高鑫(1985—),男,黑龙江鹤岗人,博士,讲师,主要从事作物高产栽培与资源高效利用研究。E-mail: gxrty2009@126.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2020LH03007);国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0300401);内蒙古民族大学博士科研启动基金(KYQD19041);内蒙古自治区“科技兴蒙”行动重点专项(KJXM2020001-05)

Difference analysis on seed yield and root cap characteristics for spring maize under water fertilizer and high yield optimization of shallow burying drip irrigation

GAO Xin(), YANG Hengshan^*(), ZHANG Ruifu, ZHANG Yuqin, LI Rui, ZHANG Mingwei

Agricultural College/Forage Crops Engineering Research Center of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,Inner Mongolia Minzu University, Tongliao 028000, Inner Mongolia,China

Received:2021-04-22 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-05
Contact: YANG Hengshan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产栽培模式对玉米产量和根冠特征的影响差异,选用2个玉米品种先玉1483和迪卡159,设置2种栽培模式:浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产模式(HY)和农户生产模式(CK),对比分析了产量性状、根冠干物质量与形态特征变化。结果表明:与CK相比,HY通过增大种植密度增加了单位面积上的穗数和穗粒数,使产量和氮肥偏生产力显著提高;促进了吐丝期至成熟期阶段的干物质积累,增大了单株叶面积与群体叶面积指数,维持了较高的叶片活性;显著降低了0~20 cm土层根系干物质量,增加了20~40 cm土层根条数,增强了根系活力。通过浅埋滴灌水肥合理调控,能够降低密植导致的不良效应,形成了良好的根冠结构,保持了个体较强的物质生产能力,从而获得较高的籽粒产量。

关键词: 玉米, 栽培模式, 浅埋滴灌, 产量, 根冠特征

Abstract:

To investigate the effect of field practice of shallow burying drip irrigation on seed yield and root cap characteristics, differences in yield characters, root and shoot dry matter quality and morphological characteristics under two cultivation modes: shallow burying drip irrigation and fertilizer optimized high yield mode (HY) and farmer production mode (CK) were studied by using two maize cultivars, Xianyu1483 and Dika159. The results showed that number of panicles and grains per unit area, yield and nitrogen fertilizer under HY mode were increased significantly compared with those under CK mode. HY practice mode also enhanced dry matter accumulation from silking to maturity stage, increased the leaf area per plant and leaf area index, kept leaf activity at a high level; In addition, dry matter mass of root system in soil depth of 0-20 cm was significantly reduced, and both the number of roots in depth of 20-40 cm and root activity improved under HY mode compared with those under CK mode. Therefore, it was concluded that HY mode weakened the adverse effects caused by dense planting, made root cap form an excellent structure and maintained a strong individual material production capacity for plants, and thereby increased seed yield.

Key words: maize, cultivation patterns, shallow drip irrigation, yield, root canopy characteristics

中图分类号:

S513

高鑫, 杨恒山, 张瑞富, 张玉芹, 李锐, 张明伟. 浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产模式下春玉米产量与根冠特征差异性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 1-9.

GAO Xin, YANG Hengshan, ZHANG Ruifu, ZHANG Yuqin, LI Rui, ZHANG Mingwei. Difference analysis on seed yield and root cap characteristics for spring maize under water fertilizer and high yield optimization of shallow burying drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 1-9.

图/表 7

表1 产量构成因素与氮偏生产力

Table 1 Yield components and nitrogen partial productivity

处理 Treatment	产量 Yield/(kg·hm^-2)	单穗重 Weight per spike/kg	每hm²穗数 Spike number per hm²	穗粒数 Grain number	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	氮偏生产力 N-PEP/(kg·kg^-1)
HY1483	17 065.95±271.35 a	0.195±0.002 a	87 390±1 035 a	520±29 a	366.49±3.58 a	51.72±0.82 a
HY159	14 808.60±534.00 b	0.168±0.005 c	88 050±2 400 a	471±15 b	361.04±2.10 a	44.87±1.61 b
CK1483	13 720.35±426.30 c	0.187±0.012 ab	73 380±2 580b	518±30 a	362.61±3.96 a	41.58±1.29 c
CK159	12 949.05±225.75 c	0.180±0.002 bc	72 090±1 800 b	508±15 ab	360.03±5.25 a	39.24±0.68 c

图1 不同模式下各生育期玉米单株干物质量变化与成熟期干物质比 V6,拔节期;V12,大喇叭口期;R1,吐丝期;R6,完熟期。柱上无相同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。

Fig.1 Changes of dry matter weight per plant at different grow stages and dry matter ratio at maturity of maize under different modes V6,Jointing stage;V12,Bell-mouthing stage;R1,Silking stage; R6, Physiological maturity stage.Bars marked without the same lowercase letter indicated significant differences at P<0.05.The same as bellow.

图2 吐丝期不同模式玉米LAI与单株叶面积

Fig.2 LAI and leaf area per plant under different modes in silking stage of maize

图3 吐丝期不同模式下玉米叶片MDA含量与SOD活性

Fig.3 Changes of MDA content and SOD activity in leaves under different modes in silking stage of maize

图4 吐丝期不同模式下玉米根系干重与根冠比

Fig.4 Dry weight of root and root shoot ratio under different modes in silking stage of maize

图5 吐丝期不同模式下的玉米根幅与根条数

Fig.5 Root radicle and root number under different modes in silking stage of maize

图6 吐丝期不同模式下的根系活力

Fig.6 Root activity under different modes in silking stage of maize

参考文献 25

[1]	李少昆, 赵久然, 董树亭, 等. 中国玉米栽培研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 1941-1959.
	LI S K, ZHAO J R, DONG S T, et al. Advances and prospects of maize cultivation in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 1941-1959.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	朴琳, 任红, 展茗, 等. 栽培措施及其互作对北方春玉米产量及耐密性的调控作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 1982-1994.
	PIAO L, REN H, ZHAN M, et al. Effect of cultivation measures and their interactions on grain yield and density resistance of spring maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 1982-1994.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	杨哲, 于胜男, 高聚林, 等. 主要栽培措施对北方春玉米产量贡献的定量评估[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3024-3035.
	YANG Z, YU S N, GAO J L, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the contribution of main management factors to grain yield of spring maize in North China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(15): 3024-3035.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	张玉芹, 杨恒山, 毕文波, 等. 不同栽培模式下春玉米生育后期冠层生理特性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27(1): 145-150.
	ZHANG Y Q, YANG H S, BI W B, et al. Study of canopy structure and physiological characteristics of spring maize at late-growth stage under different cultivation patterns[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2012, 27(1): 145-150.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	张玉芹, 杨恒山, 张瑞富, 等. 不同栽培模式下春玉米根系时空分布及生理特性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(1): 122-128.
	ZHANG Y Q, YANG H S, ZHANG R F, et al. Study of root distribution space-time and physiological characteristics of spring maize at late-growth stage under different cultivation patterns[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2014, 29(1): 122-128.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	刘笑鸣, 顾万荣, 李从锋, 等. 化学调控和氮肥对高密度下春玉米光热水利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3083-3094.
	LIU X M, GU W R, LI C F, et al. Effects of chemical regulation and nitrogen fertilizer on radiation, heat and water utilization efficiency and yield of spring maize under dense planting condition[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(15): 3083-3094.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	刘泳圻, 谷健, 孙仕军, 等. 辽西半干旱区浅埋滴灌水、氮、磷、锌耦合对春玉米产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(5): 898-908.
	LIU Y Q, GU J, SUN S J, et al. Yield effects of coupling of nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc on spring maize under shallow buried drip irrigation in semi-arid area of western Liaoning Province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(5): 898-908.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	王士杰, 尹光华, 李忠, 等. 浅埋滴灌水肥耦合对辽西半干旱区春玉米产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 139-147.
	WANG S J, YIN G H, LI Z, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on the yield of spring maize under shallow-buried drip irrigation in semi-arid region of western Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 139-147.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	李媛媛, 杨恒山, 张瑞富, 等. 浅埋滴灌条件下不同灌水量对春玉米干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1234-1242.
	LI Y Y, YANG H S, ZHANG R F, et al. Effects of different irrigation amount on dry matter accumulation and transportation of spring maize under shallow subsurface drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(8): 1234-1242.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	曹胜彪, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 等. 施氮量和种植密度对高产夏玉米产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(6): 1343-1353.
	CAO S B, ZHANG J W, DONG S T, et al. Effects of nitrogen rate and planting density on grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of high yield summer maize[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(6): 1343-1353.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	房琴, 高影, 王红光, 等. 密度和施氮量对超高产夏玉米干物质积累和产量形成的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(S1): 133-138.
	FANG Q, GAO Y, WANG H G, et al. Effect of planting density and nitrogen rate on dry matter accumulation and yield formation of super highly-yielding summer-sowing maize[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2015, 30(S1): 133-138.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	陈国平, 高聚林, 赵明, 等. 近年我国玉米超高产田的分布、产量构成及关键技术[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1): 80-85.
	CHEN G P, GAO J L, ZHAO M, et al. Distribution, yield structure, and key cultural techniques of maize super-high yield plots in recent years[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(1): 80-85.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[13]	CHEN Y L, XIAO C X, CHEN X C, et al. Characterization of the plant traits contributed to high grain yield and high grain nitrogen concentration in maize[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 159: 1-9. DOI URL
[14]	夏颖, 李海娜, 梁运江, 等. 密度与氮肥互作对玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2019, 41(4): 43-51.
	XIA Y, LI H N, LIANG Y J, et al. Effects of interaction between density and nitrogen fertilizer on maize growth and yield[J]. Agricultural Science Journal of Yanbian University, 2019, 41(4): 43-51.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	陈传永, 侯玉虹, 孙锐, 等. 密植对不同玉米品种产量性能的影响及其耐密性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(7): 1153-1160.
	CHEN C Y, HOU Y H, SUN R, et al. Effects of planting density on yield performance and density-tolerance analysis for maize hybrids[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(7): 1153-1160.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[16]	王志刚, 高聚林, 张宝林, 等. 内蒙古平原灌区高产春玉米(15 t·hm^-2以上)产量性能及增产途径[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(7): 1318-1327.
	WANG Z G, GAO J L, ZHANG B L, et al. Productivity performance of high-yield spring maize and approaches to increase grain yield(above 15 t·hm^-2)in irrigated plain of Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(7): 1318-1327.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[17]	孙锐, 朱平, 王志敏, 等. 春玉米叶面积系数动态特征的密度效应[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(6): 1097-1105.
	SUN R, ZHU P, WANG Z M, et al. Effect of plant density on dynamic characteristics of leaf area index in development of spring maize[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(6): 1097-1105.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[18]	ROSSINI M A, MADDONNI G A, OTEGUI M E. Inter-plant competition for resources in maize crops grown under contrasting nitrogen supply and density: variability in plant and ear growth[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 121(3): 373-380. DOI URL
[19]	CAO Y J, WANG L C, GU W R, et al. Increasing photosynthetic performance and post-silking N uptake by moderate decreasing leaf source of maize under high planting density[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(2): 494-510. DOI URL
[20]	刘铁宁, 徐彩龙, 谷利敏, 等. 高密度种植条件下去叶对不同株型夏玉米群体及单叶光合性能的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(1): 143-153.
	LIU T N, XU C L, GU L M, et al. Effects of leaf removal on canopy apparent photosynjournal and individual leaf photosynthetic characteristics in summer maize under high plant density[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(1): 143-153.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[21]	刘志全, 徐晓敏, 沈海波, 等. 高密度栽培条件下玉米剪叶处理对产量构成的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(6): 74-75.
	LIU Z Q, XU X M, SHEN H B, et al. Effects of leaf cutting treatment to maize yield under the high plant population cultivation condition[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2009, 17(6): 74-75.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	严云, 廖成松, 张福锁, 等. 密植条件下玉米冠根生长抑制的因果关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2): 257-265.
	YAN Y, LIAO C S, ZHANG F S, et al. The causal relationship of the decreased shoot and root growth of maize plants under higher plant density[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(2): 257-265.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	张凤路, 牛兴奎, 张怡明, 等. 提高密度对根冠发育及其产量的影响研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27(2): 146-151.
	ZHANG F L, NIU X K, ZHANG Y M, et al. Studies on the effect of density on the root-shoot relationship and yield in maize[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2012, 27(2): 146-151.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	宋日, 刘利, 吴春胜, 等. 根系生长空间对玉米生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(6): 58-64.
	SONG R, LIU L, WU C S, et al. Effects of root growth space on growth and N and P uptake in corn(Zea mays L.)[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 37(6): 58-64.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	陈延玲, 吴秋平, 陈晓超, 等. 不同耐密性玉米品种的根系生长及其对种植密度的响应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(1): 52-59.
	CHEN Y L, WU Q P, CHEN X C, et al. Root growth and its response to increasing planting density in different maize hybrids[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(1): 52-59.(in Chinese with English abstract)

浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产模式下春玉米产量与根冠特征差异性

Difference analysis on seed yield and root cap characteristics for spring maize under water fertilizer and high yield optimization of shallow burying drip irrigation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	单长林, 周圆, 任琰, 季文彬, 李孝军. 玉米内州萎蔫病菌荧光重组酶介导等温扩增检测方法的建立[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1676-1685.
[2]	王佳, 慕瑞瑞, 杨乔乔, 刘伟, 张月荷, 康建宏. 滴灌水肥一体化下施钾量对宁夏春玉米叶绿素荧光特性与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1347-1357.
[3]	齐振宇, 蔡溧聪, 胡卫珍, 蔡盼, 张龙平, 任艳云, 周艳虹. 水肥一体化模式中化肥减施与不同基追肥比例对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.
[4]	江宇航, 辛维岗, 张棋麟, 邓先余, 王峰, 林连兵. 霉变饲用玉米真菌的分离、鉴定与乳酸菌素对其的防霉抑菌效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1283-1291.
[5]	汪峰, 谌江华, 陈若霞, 史骏, 任少鹏, 金树权, 姚红燕, 朱德峰, 戴瑶璐. 减氮对甬优籼粳杂交稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 984-992.
[6]	李清斌, 秦奔奔, 李盈盈, 范凯锋, 杨栋, 陈磊, 刘鹍. 连阴雨寡日照对大棚草莓小气候、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 831-839.
[7]	张矞勋, 王磊, 璩向宁, 曹媛, 吴梦瑶, 于瑞鑫, 孙源. GF-1/WFV在玉米叶面积指数估算中的应用研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 861-872.
[8]	厉宝仙, 王保君, 怀燕, 沈亚强, 张红梅, 程旺大. 水稻-红鳌螯虾共作对稻田土壤养分、碳库与稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 688-696.
[9]	杨梅, 胡小兰, 申涛, 谭康, 刘代铃, 邱红波. 玉米第8染色体单片段代换系的构建与灰斑病抗性材料筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 383-389.
[10]	瞿展, 杨立桃. 转基因玉米TC1507质粒DNA标准物质的研制[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 390-395.
[11]	岳文俊, 何文学, 丁春梅, 柏宇, 周英杰, 奚辉. 不同滴灌水肥处理对温室甜瓜养分吸收、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2370-2380.
[12]	王博, 张永强, 宫思羽, 董权瑶, 付小钊. 农村互联网发展对中国玉米全要素生产率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2435-2445.
[13]	江涛, 王立国, 孙芳芳, 成剑波, 何腾兵, 秦松, 范成五, 阴文芳. 沼渣生物质炭对西南喀斯特山区沼液灌溉土壤氮淋溶和白菜产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2104-2115.
[14]	徐玥, 胥雅馨, 黄兴军, 吴树, 陈国栋, 吴全忠, 翟云龙. 根瘤菌接种方式对复播大豆干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1808-1816.
[15]	杨乙未, 肖华, 陈浒, 肖聶佳, 郭城. 喀斯特地区不同玫瑰混农林模式的土壤螨类群落结构特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 112-121.