整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.03.13

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 525-533.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.03.13

整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响

王慧茹(), 李建设, 闫思华, 高艳明()

宁夏大学农学院,宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2020-10-21 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-03-30
通讯作者: 高艳明
作者简介:*高艳明,E-mail: myangao@163.com
王慧茹(1996—),女,陕西榆林人,硕士研究生,研究方向为设施蔬菜栽培生理生态。E-mail: 1784710409@qq.com
基金资助:
2019年宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划(2019BBF02008);宁夏瓜菜产业技术协同创新中心(2017DC55)

Effect of prunning patterns on canopy light interception characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in cherry tomato

WANG Huiru(), LI Jianshe, YAN Sihua, GAO Yanming()

College of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

Received:2020-10-21 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-03-30
Contact: GAO Yanming

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为阐明樱桃番茄整枝方式对冠层内光合有效辐射截获和荧光特性及产量的影响,以香妃3号为试验品种,设置4种整枝方式,测定樱桃番茄冠层光截获特性、荧光特性、冠层微环境以及植株生长状态和最终产量。结果显示,针对群体冠层光截获,三杆整枝处理的光合有效辐射(IPAR)和光截获率(CaR)显著(P<0.05)高于其他处理,光透射率(PeR)显著(P<0.05)低于其他处理。针对叶片荧光特性,三杆整枝处理的叶绿素荧光参数F_v/F_m和qP相对于其他处理均有不同程度的提高。同时,三杆整枝处理的地上部生长形态、冠层微环境和产量均显著优于其他处理。研究表明,三杆整枝最利于形成合理的个体构型和群体空间排布,从而提高樱桃番茄的光能作用、生长状态和产量。

关键词: 樱桃番茄, 整枝, 冠层光截获, 荧光特性, 产量

Abstract:

To elucidate the effects of prunning patterns on canopy photosynthetically active radiation, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield, Xiangfei No.3 was selected as the experimental material, four levels were set for prunning patterns, canopy light interception characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, canopy microenvironment, growth indices and yield of plants were measured. As a result, in terms of colony canopy photosynthetically active radiation, the photosynthetic effective radiation (IPAR) and light interception rate (CaR) of plants in the three-bar prunning treatment was significantly (P<0.05) higher than other treatments, light transmittance (PeR) was on the contrary. In terms of leaf photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (F_v/F_m, qP) had different degrees of improvement than other treatments. At the same time,plants growth indices,canopy microenvironment and yield of three-bar prunning treatment was significantly (P<0.05) higher than other treatments. It can be seen that three-bar prunning was the most beneficial to form a reasonable individual configuration and population space arrangement, so as to improve the photosynthesis, growth status and yield of cherry tomato.

Key words: cherry tomato, prunning patterns, canopy light interception characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, yield

中图分类号:

S641.2

王慧茹, 李建设, 闫思华, 高艳明. 整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 525-533.

WANG Huiru, LI Jianshe, YAN Sihua, GAO Yanming. Effect of prunning patterns on canopy light interception characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in cherry tomato[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 525-533.

图/表 8

参考文献 31

[1]	黄凯美. 不同栽培密度和整枝方法对樱桃番茄农艺性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2006, 47(6): 630-631.
	HUANG K M. Effects of different planting densities and prunning methods on agronomic characters of cherry tomato[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 47(6): 630-631. (in Chinese)
[2]	陈同强, 张天柱. 玻璃温室嫁接樱桃番茄苗三干与双干整枝育苗技术[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(3): 173-176.
	CHEN T Q, ZHANG T Z. Pruning and seedling raising techniques of cherry tomato seedlings grafted with three stems and two stems in glass greenhouse[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020(3): 173-176. (in Chinese)
[3]	辛世杰, 葛婷, 朱文莹, 等. 不同整枝方式对管棚越夏栽培番茄生长的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2011(20): 43-47.
	XIN S J, GE T, ZHU W Y, et al. Effects of different prunning treatments on growth of over-summer cultivating tomato[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2011(20): 43-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	延飞龙, 赵俊晔, 石玉, 等. 灌溉畦长对小麦冠层光能利用特性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(10): 1241-1245.
	YAN F L, ZHAO J Y, SHI Y, et al. Effects of field border length for irrigation on canopy light utilization characteristics of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(10): 1241-1245. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	张龙英, 杨光, 刘昕, 等. 叶螨虫害对大白柠条叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(12): 2826-2833.
	ZHANG L Y, YANG G, LIU X, et al. Effects of tetranychidae insects on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Caragana sp[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(12): 2826-2833. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	薛华政, 谷利敏, 夏来坤, 等. 密度对粮饲通用型玉米新品种郑单901冠层结构和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(12): 23-29.
	XUE H Z, GU L M, XIA L K, et al. Effect of planting density on yield and canopy characteristics of new maize variety Zhengdan 901 for grain and silage[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(12): 23-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	范元芳, 刘沁林, 王锐, 等. 玉米-大豆带状间作对大豆生长、光合荧光特性及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(5): 972-978.
	FAN Y F, LIU Q L, WANG R, et al. Effects of shading on growth, photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(5): 972-978. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	马国治, 王惠芝, 孙永峰, 等. 整枝方式对番茄冠层特征及产量的影响[J]. 农业科学研究, 2017, 38(2): 90-93.
	MA G Z, WANG H Z, SUN Y F, et al. Impacts of different prunning modes on canopy characteristics and yield of tomatoes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 38(2): 90-93. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	李艳大, 黄俊宝, 叶春, 等. 不同氮素水平下双季稻株型与冠层内光截获特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1375-1385. DOI
	LI Y D, HUANG J B, YE C, et al. Plant type and canopy light interception characteristics in double cropping rice canopy under different nitrogen rates[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1375-1385. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	黄波, 张妍, 孙建强, 等. 氮密互作对淮北砂姜黑土区冬小麦冠层光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(8): 994-1002.
	HUANG B, ZHANG Y, SUN J Q, et al. Effect of nitrogen and density interaction on canopy photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat in Huaibei lime concretion black soil region[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(8): 994-1002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	ESCOBAR-GUTIÉRREZ A J, COMBES D, RAKOCEVIC M, et al. Functional relationships to estimate morphogenetically active radiation (MAR) from PAR and solar broadband irradiance measurements: the case of a sorghum crop[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149(8): 1244-1253.
[12]	杨再强, 朱凯, 彭晓丹, 等. 昼夜温差对设施番茄叶片光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12): 3190-3196.
	YANG Z Q, ZHU K, PENG X D, et al. Effects of day and night temperature difference on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of greenhouse tomato[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(12): 3190-3196. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	陈修斌, 李翊华, 许耀照. 温室番茄对水肥耦合的光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数响应[J]. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(3): 687-693.
	CHEN X B, LI Y H, XU Y Z, et al. Greenhouse tomato response to the coupling of water and fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 46(3): 687-693. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	王春萍, 黄启中, 雷开荣, 等. 低温弱光下辣椒幼苗叶绿素荧光特性及其与品种耐性的关系[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(9): 1798-1806.
	WANG C P, HUANG Q Z, LEI K R, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of pepper seedlings under low temperature and weak light and their relationship to varieties tolerance[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2015, 42(9): 1798-1806. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	李锡香. 番茄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[16]	吴远藩. 量叶片的长和宽计算番茄叶面积[J]. 农业科技通讯, 1980(12): 20-21.
	WU Y F. Calculate tomato leaf area by measuring leaf length and width[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 1980(12): 20-21. (in Chinese)
[17]	史泽艳, 高晓飞, 谢云. 冠层底部光合有效辐射三种测量方法的比较[J]. 资源科学, 2005(1): 104-107.
	SHI Z Y, GAO X F, XIE Y. Comparison of three methods for measurement of transmitted photo-synthetically active radiation[J]. Resources Science, 2005(1): 104-107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	苍晶, 赵会杰. 植物生理学实验教程[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013.
[19]	RUIZ R A, BERTERO H D. Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008, 29(2/3): 144-152. DOI URL
[20]	鲁美娟, 江洪, 李巍, 等. 模拟酸雨对刨花楠幼苗生长和光合生理的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 5986-5994.
	LU M J, JIANG H, LI W, et al. Effect of simulated acid rain on growth and photosynthetic physiology of Machilus pauhoi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11): 5986-5994. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	缴丽莉, 路丙社, 周如久, 等. 遮光对青榨槭光合速率及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(1): 173-178.
	JIAO L L, LU B S, ZHOU R J, et al. Effects of shading on net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of leaf in David maple(Acer davidii Franch.)[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2007, 34(1): 173-178. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	曹少娜, 李建设, 高艳明, 等. 水分传感器埋设位置对温室基质栽培番茄生长特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 933-942.
	CAO S N, LI J S, GAO Y M, et al. Effects of embedding position of moisture sensors on growth characteristics of tomato in substrate culture in greenhouse[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(6): 933-942. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	孟自力, 王和洲, 闫向泉, 等. 施氮量对小麦商麦156光合特性、冠层光截获及产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(23): 76-79.
	MENG Z L, WANG H Z, YAN X Q, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on photosynthetic characteristics, canopy light interception and yield of wheat Shangmai 156[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(23): 76-79. (in Chinese)
[24]	胡凝, 姚克敏, 张晓翠, 等. 水稻株型因子对冠层结构和光分布的影响与模拟[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5): 535-543.
	HU N, YAO K M, ZHANG X C, et al. Effect and simulation of plant type on canopy structure and radiation transmission in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(5): 535-543. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	王蕊, 吴海涵, 李天来. 日光温室番茄(Lycopersicon esculentum)群体冠层内光能截获特征及其光环境分析[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2013, 44(5): 570-574.
	WANG R, WU H H, LI T L. Impact of the light directions on light distribution of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) canopy in solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2013, 44(5): 570-574. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	徐澜, 高志强, 安伟, 等. 冬麦春播条件下旗叶光合特性、叶绿素荧光参数变化及其与产量的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 133-142.
	XU L, GAO Z Q, AN W, et al. Flag leaf photosynthetic characteristics, change in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and their relationships with yield of winter wheat sowed in spring[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 133-142. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	张继峯, 王振华, 张金珠, 等. 滴灌下氮盐交互对加工番茄荧光特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(5): 990-1003.
	ZHANG J F, WANG Z H, ZHANG J Z, et al. The influences of different nitrogen and salt levels interactions on fluorescence characteristics, yield and quality of processed tomato under drip irrigation[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5): 990-1003. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	张向前, 杜世州, 曹承富, 等. 种植密度对小麦群体质量叶绿素荧光参数和产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(5): 93-99.
	ZHANG X Q, DU S Z, CAO C F, et al. Effect of planting density on population quality, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield of wheat[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(5): 93-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	童梦莹, 黄家权, 李长江. 淹水胁迫对樱桃番茄苗期形态特征及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(11): 8-15.
	TONG M Y, HUANG J Q, LI C J. Effects of waterlogging on morphology and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of cherry tomato at seedling stage[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2019, 38(11): 8-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	李尚中, 樊廷录, 王勇, 等. 不同覆膜集雨种植方式对旱地玉米叶绿素荧光特性、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 458-466.
	LI S Z, FAN T L, WANG Y, et al. Effects of plastic film mulching and rain harvesting modes on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, yield and water use efficiency of dryland maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(2): 458-466. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	韩静, 李旭芬, 石玉, 等. 盐胁迫下外源Si和Spd对番茄幼苗生长及光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2019, 50(11): 17-23.
	HAN J, LI X F, SHI Y, et al. Effect of exogenous silicon and spermidine on growth and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of tomato seedlings under salt stress[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2019, 50(11): 17-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)

部位 Part	处理 Treatment	10月11日 Oct. 11th	10月21日 Oct. 21st	10月31日 Oct. 31st	11月10日 Nov. 10th
上层Upper	C2	27.11±0.31 a	28.30±0.02 ab	25.10±0.29 a	23.85±0.27 a
	C3	26.35±0.11 b	28.42±0.01 a	24.40±0.10 b	23.18±0.09 b
	C4	25.81±0.01 b	28.15±0.10 b	24.07±0.03 b	22.90±0.01 b
	C5	26.03±0.01 b	27.49±0.12 c	23.90±0.01 b	22.86±0.11 b
中层Middle	C2	27.00±0.31 a	28.19±0.07 a	25.00±0.29 a	23.75±0.27 a
	C3	26.28±0.10 b	28.03±0.10 a	24.33±0.09 b	23.12±0.08 b
	C4	25.70±0.01 c	28.15±0.04 a	23.97±0.03 bc	22.80±0.01 b
	C5	25.92±0.02 bc	27.41±0.17 b	23.80±0.01 c	22.71±0.11 b
下层Lower	C2	26.57±0.33 a	27.61±0.01 ab	24.60±0.31 a	23.37±0.29 a
	C3	26.03±0.06 ab	27.41±0.10 b	24.10±0.06 ab	22.90±0.05 ab
	C4	25.56±0.04 b	27.80±0.04 a	23.73±0.07 b	22.63±0.01 b
	C5	25.70±0.01 b	27.65±0.10 ab	23.67±0.03 b	22.52±0.05 b

部位 Part	处理 Treatment	10月11日 Oct. 11th	10月21日 Oct. 21st	10月31日 Oct. 31st	11月10日 Nov. 10th
上层Upper	C2	27.11±0.31 a	28.30±0.02 ab	25.10±0.29 a	23.85±0.27 a
	C3	26.35±0.11 b	28.42±0.01 a	24.40±0.10 b	23.18±0.09 b
	C4	25.81±0.01 b	28.15±0.10 b	24.07±0.03 b	22.90±0.01 b
	C5	26.03±0.01 b	27.49±0.12 c	23.90±0.01 b	22.86±0.11 b
中层Middle	C2	27.00±0.31 a	28.19±0.07 a	25.00±0.29 a	23.75±0.27 a
	C3	26.28±0.10 b	28.03±0.10 a	24.33±0.09 b	23.12±0.08 b
	C4	25.70±0.01 c	28.15±0.04 a	23.97±0.03 bc	22.80±0.01 b
	C5	25.92±0.02 bc	27.41±0.17 b	23.80±0.01 c	22.71±0.11 b
下层Lower	C2	26.57±0.33 a	27.61±0.01 ab	24.60±0.31 a	23.37±0.29 a
	C3	26.03±0.06 ab	27.41±0.10 b	24.10±0.06 ab	22.90±0.05 ab
	C4	25.56±0.04 b	27.80±0.04 a	23.73±0.07 b	22.63±0.01 b
	C5	25.70±0.01 b	27.65±0.10 ab	23.67±0.03 b	22.52±0.05 b

部位 Part	处理 Treatment	10月11日 Oct. 11th	10月21日 Oct. 21st	10月31日 Oct. 31st	11月10日 Nov. 10th
上层Upper	C2	83.62±1.92 a	75.90±0.99 ab	80.23±1.63 a	72.35±0.92 c
	C3	80.05±0.31 b	79.63±1.83 a	81.67±0.67 a	76.77±0.63 a
	C4	78.93±0.28 b	75.17±0.27 ab	79.00±0.58 a	74.26±0.54 bc
	C5	74.97±0.40 c	71.50±1.73 b	80.33±0.67 a	76.14±0.54 ab
中层Middle	C2	84.84±1.71 a	77.87±0.22 ab	76.37±0.03 b	72.69±0.39 ab
	C3	82.11±0.87 ab	80.80±1.63 a	79.77±1.92 a	73.23±0.38 a
	C4	79.56±2.56 ab	75.77±2.43 ab	77.90±0.40 ab	71.78±0.03 bc
	C5	77.25±0.40 b	74.60±1.12 b	74.90±0.35 b	71.31±0.41 c
下层Lower	C2	76.41±0.93 ab	72.77±0.88 a	66.50±0.76 b	65.49±0.31 ab
	C3	78.72±1.07 a	72.80±0.87 a	69.67±0.33 a	66.80±1.52 a
	C4	75.04±0.29 b	71.47±0.27 a	69.00±0.58 a	64.86±0.54 ab
	C5	74.34±0.68 b	72.03±0.63 a	69.01±0.59 a	63.61±0.31 b

部位 Part	处理 Treatment	10月11日 Oct. 11th	10月21日 Oct. 21st	10月31日 Oct. 31st	11月10日 Nov. 10th
上层Upper	C2	83.62±1.92 a	75.90±0.99 ab	80.23±1.63 a	72.35±0.92 c
	C3	80.05±0.31 b	79.63±1.83 a	81.67±0.67 a	76.77±0.63 a
	C4	78.93±0.28 b	75.17±0.27 ab	79.00±0.58 a	74.26±0.54 bc
	C5	74.97±0.40 c	71.50±1.73 b	80.33±0.67 a	76.14±0.54 ab
中层Middle	C2	84.84±1.71 a	77.87±0.22 ab	76.37±0.03 b	72.69±0.39 ab
	C3	82.11±0.87 ab	80.80±1.63 a	79.77±1.92 a	73.23±0.38 a
	C4	79.56±2.56 ab	75.77±2.43 ab	77.90±0.40 ab	71.78±0.03 bc
	C5	77.25±0.40 b	74.60±1.12 b	74.90±0.35 b	71.31±0.41 c
下层Lower	C2	76.41±0.93 ab	72.77±0.88 a	66.50±0.76 b	65.49±0.31 ab
	C3	78.72±1.07 a	72.80±0.87 a	69.67±0.33 a	66.80±1.52 a
	C4	75.04±0.29 b	71.47±0.27 a	69.00±0.58 a	64.86±0.54 ab
	C5	74.34±0.68 b	72.03±0.63 a	69.01±0.59 a	63.61±0.31 b

部位 Part	处理 Treatment	10月11日 Oct. 11th	10月21日 Oct. 21st	10月31日 Oct. 31st	11月10日 Nov. 10th
上层Upper	C2	147.22±22.38 b	205.50±46.47 a	81.00±3.21 bc	89.33±3.28 a
	C3	181.32±15.02 b	330.67±80.62 a	92.00±1.53 a	93.33±3.71 a
	C4	233.02±43.91 ab	143.17±34.31 a	88.67±2.96 ab	85.67±2.60 b
	C5	363.73±88.69 a	284.67±76.56 a	76.00±3.46 c	79.33±1.76 b
中层Middle	C2	49.87±7.36 b	61.00±4.31 a	28.33±2.33 a	46.00±4.16 a
	C3	58.67±1.50 b	63.17±3.28 a	30.67±3.84 a	42.00±5.13 a
	C4	85.62±9.24 a	73.67±5.78 a	28.33±0.88 a	36.67±0.88 a
	C5	69.48±3.61 ab	96.83±39.75 a	28.00±1.15 a	41.33±2.33 a
下层Lower	C2	27.50±4.76 a	29.83±4.91 a	4.67±0.88 a	16.67±1.45 a
	C3	36.12±2.25 a	20.83±2.19 a	3.00±0.58 a	15.00±3.21 a
	C4	28.42±5.24 a	30.67±6.92 a	4.33±0.33 a	16.77±0.33 a
	C5	22.92±2.40 a	21.83±2.80 a	4.68±0.88 a	17.00±1.15 a

整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响

Effect of prunning patterns on canopy light interception characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in cherry tomato

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

处理 Treatment	PSⅡ原初光能转化效率 F_v/F_m	光化学淬灭系数 qP	非光化学淬灭系数 qN
C2	0.72±0.05 ab	0.79±0.02 ab	1.05±0.16 b
C3	0.79±0.02 a	0.90±0.04 a	0.87±0.01 b
C4	0.70±0.01 ab	0.75±0.09 ab	1.28±0.31 ab
C5	0.68±0.01 b	0.63±0.02 b	1.89±0.18 a

处理 Treatment	根系活力 Root activity/ (μg·g^-1·h^-1)	根总长 Total root length/cm	根表面积 Root surface area/cm²	根平均直径 Average root diameter/mm	根体积 Root volume/cm³
C2	297.55±54.20 a	997.10±67.09 b	283.38±39.50 b	0.54±0.03 c	13.29±2.26 b
C3	353.90±122.25 a	1157.25±23.17 b	329.12±27.11 b	0.72±0.04 bc	14.49±2.99 b
C4	296.21±22.47 a	1438.12±184.10 ab	465.07±84.70 ab	0.80±0.04 ab	22.31±4.99 ab
C5	251.50±54.16 a	1818.11±192.51 a	605.04±91.38 a	0.87±0.01 a	31.23±3.08 a

处理 Treatment	小区平均产量 Average yield of plot/kg	667 m²产量 Yield per 667 m²/kg
C2	17.23±1.82 ab	3 192.22±338.01 ab
C3	19.51±1.68 a	3 615.35±312.04 a
C4	14.95±1.21 bc	2 770.13±224.36 bc
C5	13.75±1.08 bcd	2 548.15±199.30 bcd

[1]	袁文雅, 康益晨, 杨昕宇, 张茹艳, 周春涛, 王勇, 陈喜鹏, 余慧芳, 秦舒浩. 清水苜蓿土壤浸提液对连作马铃薯根际土壤环境酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 240-247.
[2]	裴芸, 徐秀红, 陆锦彪, 陈阿敏, 张万萍. 151份贵州地方樱桃番茄资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 310-316.
[3]	高鑫, 杨恒山, 张瑞富, 张玉芹, 李锐, 张明伟. 浅埋滴灌水肥优化高产模式下春玉米产量与根冠特征差异性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 1-9.
[4]	王佳, 慕瑞瑞, 杨乔乔, 刘伟, 张月荷, 康建宏. 滴灌水肥一体化下施钾量对宁夏春玉米叶绿素荧光特性与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1347-1357.
[5]	齐振宇, 蔡溧聪, 胡卫珍, 蔡盼, 张龙平, 任艳云, 周艳虹. 水肥一体化模式中化肥减施与不同基追肥比例对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.
[6]	周贝宁, 毛恋, 花壮壮, 芦建国. 碱性盐胁迫对夏蜡梅光合荧光特性影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1416-1425.
[7]	汪峰, 谌江华, 陈若霞, 史骏, 任少鹏, 金树权, 姚红燕, 朱德峰, 戴瑶璐. 减氮对甬优籼粳杂交稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 984-992.
[8]	李清斌, 秦奔奔, 李盈盈, 范凯锋, 杨栋, 陈磊, 刘鹍. 连阴雨寡日照对大棚草莓小气候、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 831-839.
[9]	厉宝仙, 王保君, 怀燕, 沈亚强, 张红梅, 程旺大. 水稻-红鳌螯虾共作对稻田土壤养分、碳库与稻米品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 688-696.
[10]	周艳超, 薛坤, 葛海燕, 陈火英, 刘杨. 基于主成分与聚类分析的樱桃番茄品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2320-2329.
[11]	岳文俊, 何文学, 丁春梅, 柏宇, 周英杰, 奚辉. 不同滴灌水肥处理对温室甜瓜养分吸收、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2370-2380.
[12]	江涛, 王立国, 孙芳芳, 成剑波, 何腾兵, 秦松, 范成五, 阴文芳. 沼渣生物质炭对西南喀斯特山区沼液灌溉土壤氮淋溶和白菜产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2104-2115.
[13]	徐玥, 胥雅馨, 黄兴军, 吴树, 陈国栋, 吴全忠, 翟云龙. 根瘤菌接种方式对复播大豆干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1808-1816.
[14]	梁乐, 刘娟, 李晓梅, 廖继超, 李焕秀, 唐懿. 三种基因型樱桃番茄混种对果实品质和硒含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1870-1878.
[15]	李金武, 郁继华, 吕剑, 冯致, 杨海兴, 车旭升, 秦启杰, 张洋, 金宁. 不同覆盖方式对高原夏季露地松花菜产量、品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.