六种茶园茶尺蠖与其蜘蛛类天敌的空间和数量关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.12

浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1349-1359.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.12

六种茶园茶尺蠖与其蜘蛛类天敌的空间和数量关系

吴筱萌^a^,^b(), 徐悦^a, 程鸿浩^a, 陈诗燕^a, 周夏芝^b, 邹运鼎^b, 毕守东^b^,^*()

a.安徽农业大学理学院,安徽合肥 230036
b.安徽农业大学林学与园林学院,安徽合肥 230036

收稿日期:2022-06-27 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-04
通讯作者: *毕守东,E-mail: bishoudong@163.com
作者简介:吴筱萌(1998—),女,安徽六安人,硕士研究生,主要从事昆虫数学生态学研究。E-mail: 1020130931@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(30871444);安徽省高校自然科学基金重点项目(KJ2020A0111)

Spatial and quantitative relationships between Ectropis obliqua hypulina and their natural enemy of spiders in 6 tea gardens

WU Xiaomeng^a^,^b(), XU Yue^a, CHENG Honghao^a, CHEN Shiyan^a, ZHOU Xiazhi^b, ZOU Yunding^b, BI Shoudong^b^,^*()

a. School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, School of Science, Hefei 230036, China
b. School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

Received:2022-06-27 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探讨蜘蛛类天敌与茶尺蠖(Ectropis obliqua hypulina)的空间关系和数量关系,为茶园茶尺蠖的综合治理提供科学依据。于2021年7月8日至2021年9月17日对安徽农业大学国家高新技术农业园安吉白茶、黄山大叶种、龙井43、农抗早、平阳特早和乌牛早茶园的茶尺蠖及其天敌进行种群数量调查。运用地学统计学方法结合角余弦系数法、密切指数和灰色关联度法对6种茶园茶尺蠖幼虫及其天敌种群动态进行分析,研究蜘蛛类天敌与茶尺蠖空间和数量关系的密切程度。根据密切指数之和得出,6种茶园中与茶尺蠖幼虫空间关系密切的前2位蜘蛛依次是鳞纹肖蛸(Tetragnatha squamata)和三突花蟹蛛(Misumenops tricuspidatus),与茶尺蠖幼虫数量关系密切的前2位蜘蛛依次是草间小黑蛛(Erigonidium graminicolum)和鳞纹肖蛸。综合分析得出,与茶尺蠖幼虫在空间和数量上关系密切的前3位蜘蛛依次是鳞纹肖蛸、八点球腹蛛(Theridion octomaculatum)和三突花蟹蛛,鳞纹肖蛸是6种茶园中茶尺蠖幼虫最主要的自然蜘蛛类天敌。研究结果可以为合理保护和利用蜘蛛类天敌提供重要科学依据。

关键词: 茶园, 茶尺蠖, 空间和数量关系, 地学统计学方法, 生物防治

Abstract:

To exlore the spatial and quantitative relationship between natural enemy of spiders and Ectropis obliqua hypulina, so as to provide scientific basis for the comprehensive management of E. obliqua hypulina in tea garden. From July 8 to September 17 in 2021, the population of E. obliqua hypulina and its natural enemy in National High Tech Agricultural Park of Anhui Agricultural University, including Anji albino tea, Huangshan large leaf, Longjing 43, Nongkangzao, Pingyangtezao and Wuniuzao. The population dynamics of E. obliqua hypulina larvae and their natural enemy in 6 tea gardens were analyzed by using geostatistics, angle cosine coefficient method, closeness index and grey correlation degree, and the close degree of spatial and quantitative relationship between spider natural enemy and E. obliqua hypulina were studied. According to the sum of closeness index of the 6 tea gardens, the top 2 spiders closely related to the space of E. obliqua hypulina were Tetragnatha squamata and Misumenops tricuspidatus. The top 2 spiders closely related to the number of E. obliqua hypulina were Erigonidium graminicolum and T. squamata. According to the comprehensive analysis, the top 3 spiders closely related to the space and number of E. obliqua hypulina were T. squamata, Theridion octomaculatum and M. tricuspidatus. T. squamata was the most important natural spider natural enemy of E. obliqua hypulina in 6 tea gardens. The results provided a reference for the biological control, rational protection and utilization of spider natural enemy of E. obliqua hypulina.

Key words: tea garden, Ectropis obliqua hypulina, spatial and quantitative relationship, geostatistics, biological control

中图分类号:

S435.711

吴筱萌, 徐悦, 程鸿浩, 陈诗燕, 周夏芝, 邹运鼎, 毕守东. 六种茶园茶尺蠖与其蜘蛛类天敌的空间和数量关系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1349-1359.

WU Xiaomeng, XU Yue, CHENG Honghao, CHEN Shiyan, ZHOU Xiazhi, ZOU Yunding, BI Shoudong. Spatial and quantitative relationships between Ectropis obliqua hypulina and their natural enemy of spiders in 6 tea gardens[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1349-1359.

图/表 7

参考文献 27

[1]	张汉鹄, 谭济才. 中国茶树害虫及其无公害治理[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 2004.
[2]	张秋芬. 茶尺蠖的发生规律及防治[J]. 农技服务, 2016, 33(17): 76.
	ZHANG Q F. Occurrence regularity and control of tea geometrid[J]. Agricultural Technology Service, 2016, 33(17): 76. (in Chinese)
[3]	汪和臣. 岳西县部分茶区暴发茶尺蠖的特点和防治策略探讨[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2021(4): 178-179.
	WANG H C. Discussion on the characteristics and control strategies of the outbreak of tea geometrid in some tea areas of Yuexi County[J]. Agricultural Development & Equipments, 2021(4): 178-179. (in Chinese)
[4]	侯建文. 茶园蜘蛛种类的调查(注)[J]. 茶叶, 1980, 6(1): 41-44.
	HOU J W. Investigation on spider species in tea garden (note)[J]. Chaye Journal of Tea, 1980, 6(1): 41-44. (in Chinese)
[5]	侯建文, 赵烨烽. 茶尺蠖幼虫分龄预测法的研究[J]. 中国茶叶, 1982, 4(2): 22-24.
	HOU J W, ZHAO Y F. Study on the age prediction method of Ectropis obliqua larvae[J]. China Tea, 1982, 4(2): 22-24. (in Chinese)
[6]	张汉鹄. 茶园蜘蛛在害虫防治中的应用[J]. 茶叶, 1985, 10(1): 44-47.
	ZHANG H H. Application of spiders in tea gardens in pest control[J]. China Tea, 1985, 10(1): 44-47.
[7]	雷舒, 李喜旺, 孙晓玲, 等. 茶尺蠖为害提高邻近茶苗对茶尺蠖幼虫的防御能力[J]. 茶叶科学, 2016, 36(6): 587-593.
	LEI S, LI X W, SUN X L, et al. Infestation of Ectropis obliqua enhances neighboring tea plant defenses against conspecific larvae[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2016, 36(6): 587-593. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	杨普香, 江新凤, 李文金, 等. 茶尺蠖和假眼小绿叶蝉防治技术研究[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(12): 23-27.
	YANG P X, JIANG X F, LI W J, et al. Prevention and control technology on Empoasca flavescens Fabricius and Eetropis oblique hypulina Wehrli[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2013, 3(12): 23-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	刘华, 梅菊芬, 徐建陶, 等. 不同性能太阳能诱虫灯对茶园茶尺蠖的诱杀效果初探[J]. 农业与技术, 2021, 41(13): 56-59.
	LIU H, MEI J F, XU J T, et al. Preliminary study on trapping and killing effect of different performance solar trapping lamps on tea geometrid in tea garden[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2021, 41(13): 56-59. (in Chinese)
[10]	王志萍, 白先丽, 黄婷婷, 等. 桂北地区茶尺蠖幼虫发生规律研究[J]. 现代园艺, 2020, 43(17): 32-33.
	WANG Z P, BAI X L, HUANG T T, et al. Study on the occurrence regularity of Ectropis obliqua larvae in northern Guangxi[J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2020, 43(17): 32-33. (in Chinese)
[11]	王勇, 张汉鹄, 邹运鼎. 彩纸对茶尺蠖幼虫诱集效率的研究[J]. 植物保护学报, 1991, 18(2): 177-180.
	WANG Y, ZHANG H G, ZOU Y D. Studies on the taxis of Ectropis obliqua hypulina larvae to certain colour paper[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 1991, 18(2): 177-180. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	朱运华, 毛平生, 谢小群, 等. 茶园天敌种类调查[J]. 蚕桑茶叶通讯, 2014(6): 35-36.
	ZHU Y H, MAO P S, XIE X Q, et al. Investigation on natural enemies in tea garden[J]. Newsletter of Sericulture and Tea, 2014(6): 35-36. (in Chinese)
[13]	柯胜兵, 周夏芝, 毕守东, 等. 茶园3种害虫与蜘蛛天敌种群动态的关系[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2011, 30(1): 78-83.
	KE S B, ZHOU X Z, BI S D, et al. Relationships among three main pests and their natural enemies of spiders in tea garden[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011, 30(1): 78-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	刘飞飞, 柯胜兵, 王建盼, 等. 蜘蛛类天敌与茶尺蠖幼虫空间关系的聚块样方方差分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(2): 133-146.
	LIU F F, KE S B, WANG J P, et al. Blocked quadrat variance analysis for spatial relation of Ectropis oblique hypulina larva and spider natural enemies[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(2): 133-146. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	邹运鼎王弘法. 农林昆虫生态学[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 1989.
[16]	邹运鼎. 害虫管理中天敌评价理论与应用[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2002: 89-91.
[17]	张志升, 王露雨. 中国蜘蛛生态大图鉴[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2017.
[18]	ROSSI R E, MULLA D J, JOURNEL A G, et al. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence[J]. Ecological Monographs, 1992, 62(2): 277-314.
[19]	徐克学. 生物数学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[20]	邓聚龙. 灰色系统理论教程[M]. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 1990.
[21]	余燕, 王振兴, 李尚, 等. 天敌对“乌牛早”茶园4种害虫空间跟随关系密切程度的年度差异[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(13): 4817-4833.
	YU Y, WANG Z X, LI S, et al. Degree of close spatial-following relationship between four insect pests and their natural enemies studied in a span of two years about “WuNiuZao” tea garden[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(13): 4817-4833. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	张书平, 余燕, 李尚, 等. 天敌对白毫早茶园四种害虫空间跟随关系密切程度的年度间差异及其原因[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2018, 55(4): 725-747.
	ZHANG S P, YU Y, LI S, et al. Spatial relationships among natural enemies and four insect pests over two consecutive years[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2018, 55(4): 725-747. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	张书平, 余燕, 李尚, 等. 茶园害虫匮乏期天敌与蚊虫的空间关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12): 4400-4412.
	ZHANG S P, YU Y, LI S, et al. Spatial relationship between natural enemies and Mosquitoes in the absence of insect pests in tea garden[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 4400-4412. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	程娴, 余燕, 王建盼, 等. 茶园天敌对花蓟马和茶短须螨的跟随效应研究[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(6): 99-106.
	CHENG X, YU Y, WANG J P, et al. Analysis of the following effect of the natural predators with Frankliniella intonsa and Brevipalpus obovatus in tea garden[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(6): 99-106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	刘爱国, 钱广晶, 宋学雨, 等. 合肥市白毫早、乌牛早茶园天敌与蓟马的空间跟随关系[J]. 植物保护学报, 2020, 47(2): 435-445.
	LIU A G, QIAN G J, SONG X Y, et al. Spatial-following relationship between thrips and their natural enemies in the Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens in Hefei[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2020, 47(2): 435-445. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	宋学雨, 钱广晶, 张书平, 等. 茶园天敌昆虫与卵形短须螨及双斑长跗萤叶甲的空间跟随关系[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(11): 89-97.
	SONG X Y, QIAN G J, ZHANG S P, et al. Spatial-following relationships between Brevipalpus obovatus, Monolepta hieroglypica and their natural enemy insects in tea garden[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24(11): 89-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	陈银方, 宋昌琪, 刘文炜. 中国茶园蜘蛛调查和保护研究综述[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2004, 45(6): 343-345.
	CHEN Y F, SONG C Q, LIU W W. Survey and protection of spiders in tea gardens in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2004, 45(6): 343-345. (in Chinese)

物种 Species	组内Intra group			组间Inter group			F值 F value	备注 Note
物种 Species	平方和 Sum of square	自由度 Degree of freedom	均方差 Mean square deviation	平方和 Sum of square	自由度 Degree of freedom	均方差 Mean square deviation	F值 F value	备注 Note
Y	51 327.600 0	24	2 138.650 0	18 221.465 1	5	4 209.688 4	1.968 4	F_0.05(5,24)=2.62
X₁	447.600 0	24	186.316 7	370.700 0	5	74.140 0	0.397 9	F_0.01(5,24)=3.90
X₂	8 358.000 0	24	348.250 0	443.867 9	5	88.773 6	0.254 9
X₃	3 844.800 0	24	160.200 0	518.166 5	5	103.633 3	0.646 9
X₄	7 035.600 0	24	293.150 0	1 137.36 6	5	227.473 2	0.776 0
X₅	2 181.600 0	24	90.900 0	210.266 1	5	42.053 2	0.462 6
X₆	1 942.000 0	24	810.083 3	7 600.000 0	5	1 520.000 0	1.877 3

物种 Species	组内Intra group			组间Inter group			F值 F value	备注 Note
物种 Species	平方和 Sum of square	自由度 Degree of freedom	均方差 Mean square deviation	平方和 Sum of square	自由度 Degree of freedom	均方差 Mean square deviation	F值 F value	备注 Note
Y	51 327.600 0	24	2 138.650 0	18 221.465 1	5	4 209.688 4	1.968 4	F_0.05(5,24)=2.62
X₁	447.600 0	24	186.316 7	370.700 0	5	74.140 0	0.397 9	F_0.01(5,24)=3.90
X₂	8 358.000 0	24	348.250 0	443.867 9	5	88.773 6	0.254 9
X₃	3 844.800 0	24	160.200 0	518.166 5	5	103.633 3	0.646 9
X₄	7 035.600 0	24	293.150 0	1 137.36 6	5	227.473 2	0.776 0
X₅	2 181.600 0	24	90.900 0	210.266 1	5	42.053 2	0.462 6
X₆	1 942.000 0	24	810.083 3	7 600.000 0	5	1 520.000 0	1.877 3

日期 Date	物种 Species	安吉白茶 Anji albino tea		黄山大叶种 Huangshan large leaf		龙井43 Longjing 43
日期 Date	物种 Species	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determinationtor
2021-07-08	Y	4.954 7	0.940 1	9.031 1	0.609 5	2.754 5	0.659 6
	X₁	3.140 7	0.862 7	2.118 8	0.883 9	3.265 2	0.752 0
	X₂	1.550 2	0.894 2	3.457 1	0.787 2	10.438 0	0.954 0
	X₃	3.254 0	0.637 7	3.815 5	0.374 5	4.379 1	0.485 7
	X₄	2.073 1	0.866 8	4.410 4	0.649 3	6.889 7	0.755 8
	X₅	23.721 0	0.532 3	0.430 9	0.724 5	1.699 3	0.877 9
	X₆	4.198 6	0.924 7	8.650 5	0.647 2	8.910 0	0.834 2
2021-08-10	Y	2.360 3	0.772 0	2.518 7	0.952 8	4.278 3	0.735 8
	X₁	4.994 5	0.715 0	6.782 5	0.779 0	1.562 1	0.801 6
	X₂	5.121 1	0.685 6	12.544 0	0.812 0	3.623 8	0.881 2
	X₃	2.424 2	0.852 9	3.945 6	0.771 2	2.996 8	0.912 2
	X₄	4.486 7	0.866 7	6.470 3	0.869 5	3.822 2	0.896 3
	X₅	3.273 2	0.391 3	2.775 2	0.857 1	2.093 0	0.942 6
	X₆	2.689 7	0.888 3	1.550 4	0.822 8	3.568 8	0.665 5
2021-08-22	Y	1.245 1	0.884 7	4.854 5	0.730 3	5.966 2	0.678 0
	X₁	3.481 2	0.577 4	3.899 6	0.585 8	3.556 5	0.952 1
	X₂	2.665 3	0.890 6	6.688 5	0.854 7	2.392 9	0.891 3
	X₃	1.778 5	0.857 4	20.918 0	0.782 2	2.494 0	0.936 2
	X₄	8.406 2	0.957 8	3.256 4	0.778 9	2.685 8	0.836 1
	X₅	6.897 7	0.983 2	1.798 3	0.712 9	7.429 7	0.953 3
	X₆	5.883 6	0.940 1	5.109 8	0.707 1	3.442 6	0.645 4
2021-09-06	Y	3.572 7	0.181 8	3.954 4	0.595 0	2.985 6	0.755 9
	X₁	2.901 4	0.480 0	3.512 3	0.104 7	2.789 4	0.797 5
	X₂	3.856 2	0.599 4	3.956 2	0.789 9	4.065 4	0.801 9
	X₃	2.123 3	0.809 9	14.149 0	0.734 4	2.905 1	0.586 4
	X₄	3.047 2	0.713 1	7.965 2	0.906 3	4.108 4	0.738 9
	X₅	3.845 2	0.478 9	4.856 5	0.873 6	2.462 5	0.756 4
	X₆	4.572 2	0.714 8	2.965 3	0.712 6	5.032 4	0.800 3
2021-09-17	Y	1.985 2	0.703 0	2.932 4	0.822 3	1.554 8	0.747 0
	X₁	1.514 2	0.881 8	2.986 9	0.781 7	0.432 4	0.876 2
	X₂	2.243 0	0.932 1	3.636 5	0.671 3	3.998 9	0.875 7
	X₃	2.958 7	0.779 2	5.945 9	0.838 3	8.352 6	0.922 8
	X₄	2.667 5	0.980 8	3.984 9	0.677 9	3.165 1	0.522 4
	X₅	4.759 3	0.649 1	2.492 9	0.865 6	3.680 6	0.538 7
	X₆	6.758 3	0.862 7	3.360 5	0.788 3	4.074 4	0.202 2
日期 Date	物种 Species	农抗早Nongkangzao		平阳特早Pingyangtezao		乌牛早Wuniuzao
日期 Date	物种 Species	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determinationtor
2021-07-08	Y	2.851 7	0.209 1	2.965 9	0.671 9	2.965 6	0.784 2
	X₁	0.582 5	0.699 2	7.567 0	0.335 9	1.863 9	0.657 0
	X₂	3.605 2	0.844 3	3.460 9	0.704 3	3.119 0	0.816 5
	X₃	8.174 0	0.904 0	3.988 7	0.758 9	3.827 0	0.860 3
	X₄	3.926 9	0.724 1	12.751 0	0.910 6	2.399 8	0.882 1
	X₅	2.431 9	0.588 9	4.189 5	0.878 5	3.855 3	0.748 5
	X₆	3.689 5	0.744 5	1.608 2	0.880 6	2.997 3	0.904 5
2021-08-10	Y	3.384 8	0.800 0	2.602 6	0.809 1	2.945 4	0.830 1
	X₁	4.267 8	0.949 5	1.061 4	0.802 7	0.525 0	0.755 9
	X₂	4.688 7	0.480 9	5.102 2	0.844 3	0.784 9	0.986 0
	X₃	6.575 6	0.845 0	1.716 6	0.937 2	11.011 0	0.895 9
	X₄	4.386 6	0.645 1	3.645 5	0.820 3	5.112 4	0.787 7
	X₅	4.853 2	0.739 7	3.988 5	0.871 0	6.040 2	0.355 6
	X₆	2.347 4	0.932 1	3.835 8	0.438 5	5.336 7	0.668 5
2021-08-22	Y	2.036 5	0.804 7	0.376 7	0.841 2	9.276 9	0.773 0
	X₁	4.291 5	0.913 9	4.385 2	0.895 5	3.698 5	0.748 3
	X₂	6.558 7	0.851 8	2.876 9	0.884 2	3.213 2	0.864 7
	X₃	3.864 9	0.774 1	3.468 8	0.836 2	2.896 5	0.681 5
	X₄	3.667 8	0.751 0	3.242 1	0.901 5	6.853 3	0.849 4
	X₅	1.417 7	0.891 9	2.999 5	0.703 9	0.787 0	0.826 8
	X₆	4.654 8	0.853 6	7.815 8	0.618 8	2.114 8	0.761 3
2021-09-06	Y	14.184 0	0.838 3	7.114 3	0.699 1	1.672 4	0.801 6
	X₁	1.697 4	0.597 3	5.963 2	0.543 9	2.410 1	0.868 8
	X₂	2.954 8	0.830 6	2.965 6	0.779 4	8.779 3	0.497 1
	X₃	3.954 2	0.851 0	12.90 9	0.899 9	4.024 5	0.754 4
	X₄	2.956 5	0.656 0	2.963 6	0.632 6	0.409 2	0.923 4
	X₅	1.158 6	0.821 8	5.964 1	0.818 1	4.956 8	0.849 9
	X₆	2.100 6	0.978 0	1.153 5	0.755 7	1.374 7	0.971 6
2021-09-17	Y	3.845 7	0.761 8	3.804 0	0.743 2	8.965 6	0.794 5
	X₁	1.234 2	0.844 3	1.411 4	0.854 4	7.876 9	0.719 0
	X₂	2.032 5	0.807 0	8.142 1	0.875 9	1.195 7	0.854 5
	X₃	5.965 3	0.842 9	4.019 5	0.862 4	5.234 6	0.823 4
	X₄	1.134 9	0.841 9	2.875 2	0.953 1	0.871 2	0.866 8
	X₅	3.065 3	0.690 0	1.668 3	0.758 3	3.899 6	0.695 7
	X₆	2.963 6	0.761 2	3.124 1	0.890 4	4.224 9	0.753 1

日期 Date	物种 Species	安吉白茶 Anji albino tea		黄山大叶种 Huangshan large leaf		龙井43 Longjing 43
日期 Date	物种 Species	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determinationtor
2021-07-08	Y	4.954 7	0.940 1	9.031 1	0.609 5	2.754 5	0.659 6
	X₁	3.140 7	0.862 7	2.118 8	0.883 9	3.265 2	0.752 0
	X₂	1.550 2	0.894 2	3.457 1	0.787 2	10.438 0	0.954 0
	X₃	3.254 0	0.637 7	3.815 5	0.374 5	4.379 1	0.485 7
	X₄	2.073 1	0.866 8	4.410 4	0.649 3	6.889 7	0.755 8
	X₅	23.721 0	0.532 3	0.430 9	0.724 5	1.699 3	0.877 9
	X₆	4.198 6	0.924 7	8.650 5	0.647 2	8.910 0	0.834 2
2021-08-10	Y	2.360 3	0.772 0	2.518 7	0.952 8	4.278 3	0.735 8
	X₁	4.994 5	0.715 0	6.782 5	0.779 0	1.562 1	0.801 6
	X₂	5.121 1	0.685 6	12.544 0	0.812 0	3.623 8	0.881 2
	X₃	2.424 2	0.852 9	3.945 6	0.771 2	2.996 8	0.912 2
	X₄	4.486 7	0.866 7	6.470 3	0.869 5	3.822 2	0.896 3
	X₅	3.273 2	0.391 3	2.775 2	0.857 1	2.093 0	0.942 6
	X₆	2.689 7	0.888 3	1.550 4	0.822 8	3.568 8	0.665 5
2021-08-22	Y	1.245 1	0.884 7	4.854 5	0.730 3	5.966 2	0.678 0
	X₁	3.481 2	0.577 4	3.899 6	0.585 8	3.556 5	0.952 1
	X₂	2.665 3	0.890 6	6.688 5	0.854 7	2.392 9	0.891 3
	X₃	1.778 5	0.857 4	20.918 0	0.782 2	2.494 0	0.936 2
	X₄	8.406 2	0.957 8	3.256 4	0.778 9	2.685 8	0.836 1
	X₅	6.897 7	0.983 2	1.798 3	0.712 9	7.429 7	0.953 3
	X₆	5.883 6	0.940 1	5.109 8	0.707 1	3.442 6	0.645 4
2021-09-06	Y	3.572 7	0.181 8	3.954 4	0.595 0	2.985 6	0.755 9
	X₁	2.901 4	0.480 0	3.512 3	0.104 7	2.789 4	0.797 5
	X₂	3.856 2	0.599 4	3.956 2	0.789 9	4.065 4	0.801 9
	X₃	2.123 3	0.809 9	14.149 0	0.734 4	2.905 1	0.586 4
	X₄	3.047 2	0.713 1	7.965 2	0.906 3	4.108 4	0.738 9
	X₅	3.845 2	0.478 9	4.856 5	0.873 6	2.462 5	0.756 4
	X₆	4.572 2	0.714 8	2.965 3	0.712 6	5.032 4	0.800 3
2021-09-17	Y	1.985 2	0.703 0	2.932 4	0.822 3	1.554 8	0.747 0
	X₁	1.514 2	0.881 8	2.986 9	0.781 7	0.432 4	0.876 2
	X₂	2.243 0	0.932 1	3.636 5	0.671 3	3.998 9	0.875 7
	X₃	2.958 7	0.779 2	5.945 9	0.838 3	8.352 6	0.922 8
	X₄	2.667 5	0.980 8	3.984 9	0.677 9	3.165 1	0.522 4
	X₅	4.759 3	0.649 1	2.492 9	0.865 6	3.680 6	0.538 7
	X₆	6.758 3	0.862 7	3.360 5	0.788 3	4.074 4	0.202 2
日期 Date	物种 Species	农抗早Nongkangzao		平阳特早Pingyangtezao		乌牛早Wuniuzao
日期 Date	物种 Species	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination	变程 Variation	决定系数 Coefficient of determinationtor
2021-07-08	Y	2.851 7	0.209 1	2.965 9	0.671 9	2.965 6	0.784 2
	X₁	0.582 5	0.699 2	7.567 0	0.335 9	1.863 9	0.657 0
	X₂	3.605 2	0.844 3	3.460 9	0.704 3	3.119 0	0.816 5
	X₃	8.174 0	0.904 0	3.988 7	0.758 9	3.827 0	0.860 3
	X₄	3.926 9	0.724 1	12.751 0	0.910 6	2.399 8	0.882 1
	X₅	2.431 9	0.588 9	4.189 5	0.878 5	3.855 3	0.748 5
	X₆	3.689 5	0.744 5	1.608 2	0.880 6	2.997 3	0.904 5
2021-08-10	Y	3.384 8	0.800 0	2.602 6	0.809 1	2.945 4	0.830 1
	X₁	4.267 8	0.949 5	1.061 4	0.802 7	0.525 0	0.755 9
	X₂	4.688 7	0.480 9	5.102 2	0.844 3	0.784 9	0.986 0
	X₃	6.575 6	0.845 0	1.716 6	0.937 2	11.011 0	0.895 9
	X₄	4.386 6	0.645 1	3.645 5	0.820 3	5.112 4	0.787 7
	X₅	4.853 2	0.739 7	3.988 5	0.871 0	6.040 2	0.355 6
	X₆	2.347 4	0.932 1	3.835 8	0.438 5	5.336 7	0.668 5
2021-08-22	Y	2.036 5	0.804 7	0.376 7	0.841 2	9.276 9	0.773 0
	X₁	4.291 5	0.913 9	4.385 2	0.895 5	3.698 5	0.748 3
	X₂	6.558 7	0.851 8	2.876 9	0.884 2	3.213 2	0.864 7
	X₃	3.864 9	0.774 1	3.468 8	0.836 2	2.896 5	0.681 5
	X₄	3.667 8	0.751 0	3.242 1	0.901 5	6.853 3	0.849 4
	X₅	1.417 7	0.891 9	2.999 5	0.703 9	0.787 0	0.826 8
	X₆	4.654 8	0.853 6	7.815 8	0.618 8	2.114 8	0.761 3
2021-09-06	Y	14.184 0	0.838 3	7.114 3	0.699 1	1.672 4	0.801 6
	X₁	1.697 4	0.597 3	5.963 2	0.543 9	2.410 1	0.868 8
	X₂	2.954 8	0.830 6	2.965 6	0.779 4	8.779 3	0.497 1
	X₃	3.954 2	0.851 0	12.90 9	0.899 9	4.024 5	0.754 4
	X₄	2.956 5	0.656 0	2.963 6	0.632 6	0.409 2	0.923 4
	X₅	1.158 6	0.821 8	5.964 1	0.818 1	4.956 8	0.849 9
	X₆	2.100 6	0.978 0	1.153 5	0.755 7	1.374 7	0.971 6
2021-09-17	Y	3.845 7	0.761 8	3.804 0	0.743 2	8.965 6	0.794 5
	X₁	1.234 2	0.844 3	1.411 4	0.854 4	7.876 9	0.719 0
	X₂	2.032 5	0.807 0	8.142 1	0.875 9	1.195 7	0.854 5
	X₃	5.965 3	0.842 9	4.019 5	0.862 4	5.234 6	0.823 4
	X₄	1.134 9	0.841 9	2.875 2	0.953 1	0.871 2	0.866 8
	X₅	3.065 3	0.690 0	1.668 3	0.758 3	3.899 6	0.695 7
	X₆	2.963 6	0.761 2	3.124 1	0.890 4	4.224 9	0.753 1

物种 Species	安吉白茶 Anji albino tea		黄山大叶种 Huangshan large leaf		龙井43 Longjing 43		农抗早 Nongkangzao		平阳特早 Pingyangtezao		乌牛早 Wuniuzao
物种 Species	角余弦系数 Coefficient of angular cosine	序号 Serial number	角余弦系数 Coefficient of angular cosine	序号 Serial number	角余弦系数 Coefficient of angular cosine	序号 Serial number	角余弦系数 Coefficient of angular cosine	序号 Serial number	角余弦系数 Coefficient of angular cosine	序号 Serial number	角余弦系数 Coefficient of angular cosine	序号 Serial number
X₁	0.853 3	3	0.716 2	3	0.926 2	1	0.538 9	6	0.773 9	4	0.919 6	1
X₂	0.796 4	5	0.669 7	5	0.711 6	5	0.604 7	4	0.774 5	3	0.490 7	6
X₃	0.940 6	1	0.710 0	4	0.678 4	6	0.644 5	1	0.949 3	1	0.663 7	4
X₄	0.646 9	6	0.803 5	2	0.819 0	3	0.676 1	2	0.628 3	5	0.772 2	3
X₅	0.879 9	2	0.619 0	6	0.918 9	2	0.541 5	5	0.899 9	2	0.609 5	5
X₆	0.822 5	4	0.992 2	1	0.792 7	4	0.607 8	3	0.444 4	6	0.786 5	2

六种茶园茶尺蠖与其蜘蛛类天敌的空间和数量关系

Spatial and quantitative relationships between Ectropis obliqua hypulina and their natural enemy of spiders in 6 tea gardens

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

物种 Species	安吉白茶 Anji albino tea		黄山大叶种 Huangshan large leaf		龙井43 Longjing 43		农抗早 Nongkangzao		平阳特早 Pingyangtezao		乌牛早 Wuniuzao
物种 Species	灰色关联度 Gray correlation degree	序号 Serial number	灰色关联度 Gray correlation degree	序号 Serial number	灰色关联度 Gray correlation degree	序号 Serial number	灰色关联度 Gray correlation degree	序号 Serial number	灰色关联度 Gray correlation degree	序号 Serial number	灰色关联度 Gray correlation degree	序号 Serial number
X₁	0.670 4	4	0.653 6	4	0.773 5	5	0.767 1	1	0.695 1	4	0.737 4	2
X₂	0.661 1	5	0.710 1	2	0.783 8	4	0.669 6	6	0.741 0	3	0.806 6	1
X₃	0.678 0	3	0.626 4	5	0.820 9	2	0.731 1	2	0.843 9	1	0.600 1	6
X₄	0.771 7	1	0.671 3	3	0.788 2	3	0.675 0	4	0.679 2	5	0.688 0	4
X₅	0.730 8	2	0.750 8	1	0.634 6	6	0.671 4	5	0.752 1	2	0.694 4	3
X₆	0.613 7	6	0.524 3	6	0.901 6	1	0.682 5	3	0.632 7	6	0.642 7	5

物种 Species	安吉白茶Anji albino tea					黄山大叶种Huangshan large leaf					龙井43 Longjing 43
物种 Species	K₁	S₁	K₁+S₁	R	K₁		S₁	K₁+S₁	R	K₁		S₁	K₁+S₁	R
X₁	0.907 2	0.868 7	1.775 9	3	0.721 8		0.870 5	1.592 3	5	1.000 0		0.857 9	1.857 9	1
X₂	0.846 7	0.856 7	1.703 4	4	0.675 0		0.945 8	1.620 8	4	0.768 3		0.869 3	1.637 6	6
X₃	1.000 0	0.878 6	1.878 6	2	0.715 6		0.834 3	1.549 9	6	0.732 5		0.910 5	1.643 0	5
X₄	0.687 8	1.000 0	1.687 8	5	0.809 8		0.894 1	1.703 9	1	0.894 3		0.874 2	1.768 5	3
X₅	0.935 5	0.947 0	1.882 5	1	0.623 9		1.000 0	1.623 9	3	0.992 1		0.703 9	1.696 0	4
X₆	0.874 4	0.795 3	1.669 7	6	1.000 0		0.698 3	1.698 3	2	0.855 9		1.000 0	1.855 9	2
物种 Species	农抗早Nongkangzao					平阳特早Pingyangtezao					乌牛早Wuniuzao
物种 Species	K₁	S₁	K₁+S₁	R	K₁		S₁	K₁+S₁	R	K₁		S₁	K₁+S₁	R
X₁	0.797 1	1.000 0	1.797 1	3	0.815 2		0.823 7	1.638 9	4	1.000 0		0.914 2	1.914 2	1
X₂	0.890 0	0.872 9	1.762 9	5	0.815 9		0.878 1	1.694 0	3	0.533 6		1.000 0	1.533 6	4
X₃	0.953 3	0.953 1	1.906 4	1	1.000 0		1.000 0	2.000 0	1	0.721 7		0.744 0	1.465 7	6
X₄	1.000 0	0.879 9	1.879 9	2	0.661 9		0.804 8	1.466 7	5	0.839 7		0.853 0	1.692 7	2
X₅	0.800 9	0.875 2	1.676 1	6	0.948 0		0.891 2	1.839 2	2	0.662 8		0.860 9	1.523 7	5
X₆	0.899 0	0.889 7	1.788 7	4	0.468 1		0.749 7	1.217 8	6	0.855 3		0.796 8	1.652 1	3

项目 Term	物种Species
项目 Term	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆
∑K₁	5.241 3	4.529 5	5.123 1	4.893 5	4.962 3	4.952 7
∑S₁	5.335 0	5.422 8	5.320 5	5.306 0	5.278 2	4.929 8
∑(K₁+S₁)	10.576 3	9.952 3	10.443 6	10.199 5	10.240 5	9.882 5
前3位出现的次数(第一位出现的次数)	2(1)	3(1)	4(1)	3(1)	4(1)	2(1)
Number of occurrences in the top 3 positions (number of occurrences for the first position)

[1]	杨凯, 陈凯, 李红梅, 赵忠娟, 扈进冬, 李纪顺, 杨合同. 哈茨木霉LTR-2与产脲节杆菌DnL1-1协同对小麦茎基腐病的防治效果与机理[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1385-1395.
[2]	俞巧钢, 姜铭北, 孙万春, 黄郑宸, 王峰, 王强, 马军伟. 秸秆覆盖和绿肥种植对丘陵茶园氮磷流失的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 903-912.
[3]	姚龙仁, 王肖君, 卓超, 冷明珠, 倪吾钟. 模拟酸雨对茶园土壤磷素溶出特征与形态的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2700-2709.
[4]	秦宽, 梁小龙, 曹成茂, 方梁菲, 吴正敏, 葛俊. 茶园节能型开沟刀设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1320-1328.
[5]	李红, 唐美君, 郭华伟, 王志博, 肖强. EoNPV对茶尺蠖两近缘种的毒力差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1415-1419.
[6]	朱森林, 王丹媚, 唐秀梅, 陈瑞, 杨蓉, 徐月妹, 金璐懿, 任晴雯, 刘鹏, 罗军. 木霉水分散粒剂的培养条件优化及其对黄瓜枯萎病的防治效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1009-1018.
[7]	刘春林, 张建, 彭益书, 倪莘然, 杨瑞东. 贵州雷山茶区土壤-茶叶重金属含量特征及饮茶风险评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1049-1059.
[8]	冯江鹏, 邱莉萍, 梁秀燕, 陈碧秀, 夏海洋, 彭春龙, 钟永军. 草莓胶孢炭疽菌拮抗细菌贝莱斯芽孢杆菌JK3的鉴定及其抗菌活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 831-839.
[9]	黄俊, 钱诚, 吕要斌. 一种南方小花蝽产卵基质的高效利用方法[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 455-459.
[10]	白家赫, 唐美君, 殷坤山, 王志博, 肖强. 灰茶尺蛾和小茶尺蠖两近缘种的生物学特性差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(5): 797-803.
[11]	唐美君, 郭华伟, 葛超美, 殷坤山, 肖强. EoNPV对灰茶尺蠖的致病特性及高效毒株筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(10): 1686-1691.
[12]	赵燕燕, 田俊策, 郑许松, 徐红星, 鲁艳辉, 杨亚军, 臧连生, 吕仲贤. 酢浆草和车轴草作为螟黄赤眼蜂田间蜜源植物的可行性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(1): 106-112.
[13]	葛超美，殷坤山，唐美君，肖强*. 灰茶尺蠖的生物学特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 464-.
[14]	张建萍，段桂芳，杨爽，周勇军，陆永良*，余柳青. 微生物除草剂禾长蠕孢菌孢子助剂筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(1): 90-.
[15]	袁大刚，蒲光兰，程伟丽，王昌全，何刚. 川西稻田改为茶园后土壤pH和腐殖质组成剖面分布变化特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(1): 104-.