浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 206-216.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250222
周航1(
), 孙梦瑶1, 杨艾勇2, 余洋洋1, 裘垚1, 杨永锋3, 陈红丽1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-03-19
出版日期:2026-02-25
发布日期:2026-03-24
作者简介:周航,主要从事烟草质量评价研究。E-mail:zhou813010@163.com
通讯作者:
*陈红丽,E-mail: chenhonglili06@163.com
基金资助:
ZHOU Hang1(
), SUN Mengyao1, YANG Aiyong2, YU Yangyang1, QIU Yao1, YANG Yongfeng3, CHEN Hongli1,*(
)
Received:2025-03-19
Online:2026-02-25
Published:2026-03-24
摘要:
为有效降低烟叶淀粉含量以提升品质,从烟叶表面筛选出可高效降解烟叶淀粉的菌株K1,经分子生物学鉴定,确定其为鲁戈斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus rugosus)。基于单因素试验和响应面分析,探究最利于该菌株降解烟叶淀粉的发酵条件。结果表明:其最适碳源、氮源和无机盐分别为麦麸、豆粕和KH2PO4。经优化,其最适发酵条件为:麦麸13.6 g·L-1,豆粕11.7 g·L-1,KH2PO4 12.5g·L-1,pH值8.0,转速200 r·min-1,发酵温度32 ℃。在此条件下,其淀粉酶活性达145.08 U·mL-1,发酵后烟叶的淀粉含量下降49.43%,总糖和还原糖含量分别增加9.11%和11.05%。研究结果为降解烟叶淀粉、提高烟叶质量提供了优良的菌种资源,为烟叶淀粉降解菌的进一步开发利用奠定了基础。
中图分类号:
周航, 孙梦瑶, 杨艾勇, 余洋洋, 裘垚, 杨永锋, 陈红丽. 一株新型烟叶淀粉降解菌的筛选鉴定及其发酵条件优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(2): 206-216.
ZHOU Hang, SUN Mengyao, YANG Aiyong, YU Yangyang, QIU Yao, YANG Yongfeng, CHEN Hongli. Screening, identification and fermentation condition optimization of a novel starch-degrading bacterium isolated from tobacco leaves[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 206-216.
| 菌落编号 Colony No. | d/mm | D/mm | D/d | Y/(U·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 6.0 | 19 | 3.17 | 68.85±1.81 a |
| W1 | 4.5 | 14 | 3.11 | 37.66±1.67 c |
| 4 | 5.0 | 15 | 3.00 | 47.07±0.88 b |
| 6 | 4.5 | 14 | 3.11 | 44.88±1.97 b |
表1 分离得到的产淀粉酶菌株的透明圈直径(D)、菌落直径(D)与淀粉酶活性(Y)
Table 1 The diameter of the transparent zone (D), colony diameter (d) and amylase activity (Y) of the isolated amylase-producing strains
| 菌落编号 Colony No. | d/mm | D/mm | D/d | Y/(U·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 6.0 | 19 | 3.17 | 68.85±1.81 a |
| W1 | 4.5 | 14 | 3.11 | 37.66±1.67 c |
| 4 | 5.0 | 15 | 3.00 | 47.07±0.88 b |
| 6 | 4.5 | 14 | 3.11 | 44.88±1.97 b |
图3 碳源、氮源和无机盐种类对菌株淀粉酶活性的影响 柱上无相同字母的表示差异显著(p<0.05)。下同。CMC-Na, 羧甲基纤维素钠。
Fig.3 Effects of carbon source, nitrogen source and inorganic salt species on amylase activity of test strain Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at p<0.05. The same as below. CMC-Na, Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose.
图4 最适碳源、氮源和无机盐质量浓度对菌株淀粉酶活性的影响
Fig.4 Effects of mass concentration of suitable carbon source, nitrogen source and inorganic salt on amylase activity of test strain
| 编号No. | A/(g·L-1) | B/(g·L-1) | C/(g·L-1) | Y/(U·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 109.238 |
| 2 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 98.694 |
| 3 | 5 | 15 | 13 | 108.919 |
| 4 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 106.970 |
| 5 | 5 | 10 | 9 | 105.924 |
| 6 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 94.843 |
| 7 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 102.993 |
| 8 | 15 | 10 | 17 | 92.286 |
| 9 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 99.207 |
| 10 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 107.173 |
| 11 | 10 | 5 | 17 | 93.949 |
| 12 | 10 | 15 | 17 | 95.265 |
| 13 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 119.450 |
| 14 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 117.574 |
| 15 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 117.348 |
| 16 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 115.780 |
| 17 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 116.785 |
表2 Box-Behnken试验设计与结果
Table 2 Design and results of Box-Behnken test
| 编号No. | A/(g·L-1) | B/(g·L-1) | C/(g·L-1) | Y/(U·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 109.238 |
| 2 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 98.694 |
| 3 | 5 | 15 | 13 | 108.919 |
| 4 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 106.970 |
| 5 | 5 | 10 | 9 | 105.924 |
| 6 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 94.843 |
| 7 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 102.993 |
| 8 | 15 | 10 | 17 | 92.286 |
| 9 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 99.207 |
| 10 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 107.173 |
| 11 | 10 | 5 | 17 | 93.949 |
| 12 | 10 | 15 | 17 | 95.265 |
| 13 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 119.450 |
| 14 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 117.574 |
| 15 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 117.348 |
| 16 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 115.780 |
| 17 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 116.785 |
图5 麦麸、豆粕、KH2PO4质量浓度交互作用对菌株淀粉酶活性影响的响应面和等高线图 A,麦麸质量浓度;B,豆粕质量浓度;C,KH2PO4质量浓度。
Fig.5 Response surface and contour plots of the interaction of mass concentration of wheat bran, soybean meal and KH2PO4 on amylase activity of test strain A, Mass concentration of wheat bran; B, Mass concentration of soybean meal; C, Mass concentration of KH2PO4.
| 处理 Treatment | 烟碱含量/ (g·kg-1) Nicotine content/ (g·kg-1) | 还原糖含量/ (g·kg-1) Reducing sugar content/ (g·kg-1) | 总糖含量/ (g·kg-1) Total sugar content/ (g·kg-1) | 总氮含量/ (g·kg-1) Total nitrogen content/ (g·kg-1) | 钾含量/ (g·kg-1) Potassium content/ (g·kg-1) | 氯含量/ (g·kg-1) Chlorine content/ (g·kg-1) | 淀粉含量/ (g·kg-1) Starch content/ (g·kg-1) | 钾氯比 Ratio of potassium to chloride | 两糖比 Ratio of reducing sugar to total sugar | 糖碱比 Ratio of total sugar to nicotine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 19.5± 0.3 a | 256.0± 2.0 b | 296.3± 1.5 b | 17.3± 0.2 b | 14.3± 0.2 b | 5.8± 0.1 b | 61.7± 0.5 a | 2.45± 0.06 b | 0.86± 0.01 a | 15.17± 0.24 b |
| T | 18.1± 0.2 b | 284.3± 1.5 a | 323.3± 4.6 a | 20.1± 0.2 a | 19.0± 0.1 a | 6.5± 0.2 a | 31.2± 0.7 b | 2.93± 0.08 a | 0.88± 0.01 a | 17.90± 0.32 a |
表3 不同条件下烟叶的常规化学成分
Table 3 Chemical composition of tobacco leaves under different treatments
| 处理 Treatment | 烟碱含量/ (g·kg-1) Nicotine content/ (g·kg-1) | 还原糖含量/ (g·kg-1) Reducing sugar content/ (g·kg-1) | 总糖含量/ (g·kg-1) Total sugar content/ (g·kg-1) | 总氮含量/ (g·kg-1) Total nitrogen content/ (g·kg-1) | 钾含量/ (g·kg-1) Potassium content/ (g·kg-1) | 氯含量/ (g·kg-1) Chlorine content/ (g·kg-1) | 淀粉含量/ (g·kg-1) Starch content/ (g·kg-1) | 钾氯比 Ratio of potassium to chloride | 两糖比 Ratio of reducing sugar to total sugar | 糖碱比 Ratio of total sugar to nicotine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 19.5± 0.3 a | 256.0± 2.0 b | 296.3± 1.5 b | 17.3± 0.2 b | 14.3± 0.2 b | 5.8± 0.1 b | 61.7± 0.5 a | 2.45± 0.06 b | 0.86± 0.01 a | 15.17± 0.24 b |
| T | 18.1± 0.2 b | 284.3± 1.5 a | 323.3± 4.6 a | 20.1± 0.2 a | 19.0± 0.1 a | 6.5± 0.2 a | 31.2± 0.7 b | 2.93± 0.08 a | 0.88± 0.01 a | 17.90± 0.32 a |
| [1] | 罗凯玉, 付凯睿, 田斌强. 烟叶淀粉研究进展[J]. 粮食科技与经济, 2019, 44(10): 92-96. |
| LUO K Y, FU K R, TIAN B Q. Research progress on tobacco leaf starch[J]. Grain Science and Technology and Economy, 2019, 44(10): 92-96. | |
| [31] | LI Y S, CUI W Y, ZHANG C F, et al. Optimization of culture medium and fermentation parameters of Bacillus velezensis HC-8 antagonistic to Erysiphe lonicerae[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2021, 52(8): 2148-2157. |
| [32] | 袁宇, 蓝艳禹, 黄臣, 等. 响应面法优化肠膜明串珠菌生物合成右旋糖酐工艺条件[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2018, 39(7): 187-192. |
| [2] | 冯颖杰, 王鹏飞, 陈芝飞, 等. 烟叶中1株可高效降解淀粉的菌株筛选与作用效果研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(1): 150-154. |
| FENG Y J, WANG P F, CHEN Z F, et al. Screening and application of an efficient starch-degrading strain from tobacco leaf[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 47(1): 150-154. | |
| [3] | 王红刚, 董维杰, 窦玉青, 等. 烤烟烟叶淀粉含量与其感官质量的相关性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(7): 1533-1537. |
| WANG H G, DONG W J, DOU Y Q, et al. Research of correlationship between starch content and sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 30(7): 1533-1537. | |
| [4] | XING L, ZHANG M, LIU L L, et al. Multiomics provides insights into the succession of microbiota and metabolite during plant leaf fermentation[J]. Environmental Research, 2023, 221: 115304. |
| [5] | 刘晓敏, 卢婷, 李勇, 等. 酶制剂预处理对酵母菌发酵烟叶的影响[J]. 生物技术进展, 2025, 15(1): 93-101. |
| LIU X M, LU T, LI Y, et al. The impact of enzyme treatment on yeast fermentation of tobacco[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(1): 93-101. | |
| [6] | 王勇, 王行, 贺广生, 等. 耐高温产淀粉酶芽孢杆菌在烟叶烘烤中降解淀粉的应用研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2017, 23(4): 56-63. |
| [32] | YUAN Y, LAN Y Y, HUANG C, et al. Optimization of Leuconostoc mesenteroides biosynthesis of the dextran by response surface methodology[J]. Food Research and Development, 2018, 39(7): 187-192. |
| [6] | WANG Y, WANG H, HE G S, et al. Effects of amylase producing thermophilic Bacillus strains on starch degradation in tobacco during flue-curing[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2017, 23(4): 56-63. |
| [7] | 陈雨峰, 王佩, 王行, 等. 不同浓度芽孢杆菌液对密集烘烤烟叶淀粉降解和质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(5): 37-41. |
| CHEN Y F, WANG P, WANG H, et al. Effects of different concentrations of Bacillus agents on starch degradation and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(5): 37-41. | |
| [8] | 孙光伟, 孙敬国, 陈振国, 等. 烟叶淀粉降解菌的筛选及其作用效果研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2024, 45(1): 70-78. |
| SUN G W, SUN J G, CHEN Z G, et al. Screening and effect evaluation of starch degrading bacteria in tobacco leaf[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2024, 45(1): 70-78. | |
| [9] | 张晓瑞, 刘晓晖, 付博, 等. 烟草中淀粉降解菌的筛选、鉴定及发酵工艺优化[J]. 食品与机械, 2021, 37(2): 34-41. |
| ZHANG X R, LIU X H, FU B, et al. Screening, identification and fermentation process optimization of starch degrading bacteria in tobacco[J]. Food & Machinery, 2021, 37(2): 34-41. | |
| [10] | GONG Y N, LI J J, DENG X H, et al. Application of starch degrading bacteria from tobacco leaves in improving the flavor of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14: 1211936. |
| [11] | 王宝强, 吴潇, 季秀玲, 等. 陈化烟叶产淀粉酶菌株的复筛及产酶条件优化[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2016, 47(9): 13-18. |
| WANG B Q, WU X, JI X L, et al. Screen of amylase-producing bacterial strains of tabacco and enzyme production conditions optimize[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 47(9): 13-18. | |
| [12] | 刘和. 棘孢木霉内切几丁质酶42基因表达调控与工程菌株构建[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019: 22-35. |
| LIU H. Regulation on expression of Trichoderma asperellum endochitinase 42 gene and construction of engineering strain[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019: 22-35. | |
| [13] | 辛磊, 安慧, 覃国乐, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌XL05菌株的紫外诱变及发酵配方优化[J]. 发酵科技通讯, 2020, 49(3): 142-146. |
| XIN L, AN H, QIN G L, et al. The mutagenesis of Bacillus subtilis XL05 by UV radiation and optimization of fermentation medium formula[J]. Bulletin of Fermentation Science and Technology, 2020, 49(3): 142-146. | |
| [14] | 胡志忠, 姜宇, 龙章德, 等. 利用产香酵母发酵技术改善烟叶品质[J]. 食品与机械, 2018, 34(11): 200-204. |
| HU Z Z, JIANG Y, LONG Z D, et al. Study on improvement of tobacco quality by fermentation technology with aroma producing yeast[J]. Food & Machinery, 2018, 34(11): 200-204. | |
| [15] | 马玲玲. 同时高效降解烟叶中淀粉和蛋白质菌株的分离鉴定及其对烟叶理化成分的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015. |
| MA L L. Isolation and identification of a strain with ability to degrade starch and protein simultaneously from tobacco leaf and its effect on composition of tobacco leaf[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2015. | |
| [16] | 冯瑜, 陈华, 付利波, 等. 利用绿肥提高云南抚仙湖径流区烟田土壤养分和烤烟品质[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(11): 2083-2094. |
| FENG Y, CHEN H, FU L B, et al. Utilizing green manure to increase tobacco quality and soil fertility in the erosion area of Fuxian Lake in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(11): 2083-2094. | |
| [17] | PEREZ J J, VILLANUEVA M E, SÁNCHEZ L, et al. Low cost and regenerable composites based on chitin/bentonite for the adsorption of potential emerging pollutants[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2020, 194: 105703. |
| [18] | 吴家奇, 李力, 白金, 等. 响应面法优化红茶菌细菌纤维素生产条件[J]. 现代食品科技, 2024, 40(6): 133-140. |
| WU J Q, LI L, BAI J, et al. Optimization of production conditions for kombucha bacterial cellulose by the response surface method[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2024, 40(6): 133-140. | |
| [19] | 王希国, 杨谦, 燕红. 高效降解纤维素菌株的筛选与鉴定[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2007(8): 70-71. |
| WANG X G, YANG Q, YAN H. Screening and identification for cellulose degradation of strain[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2007(8): 70-71. | |
| [20] | 倪小英, 张永普, 贾守菊, 等. pH和温度对小荚蛏淀粉酶和纤维素酶活性的影响[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2009, 31(1): 151-154. |
| NI X Y, ZHANG Y P, JIA S J, et al. Effects of temperature and pH on the digestive amylase and cellulose activities of Siliqua minima[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2009, 31(1): 151-154. | |
| [21] | 温冬灼, 张智, 魏罡, 等. 纤维素降解芽孢杆菌筛选及产酶条件优化[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(2): 169-180. |
| WEN D Z, ZHANG Z, WEI G, et al. Screening of cellulose-degrading Bacillus and optimization of enzyme production conditions[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(2): 169-180. | |
| [22] | 聂晶晶, 叶建斌, 马科, 等. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌Y11产淀粉酶的条件优化[J]. 农产品加工, 2019(10): 34-39. |
| NIE J J, YE J B, MA K, et al. Optimization of amylase production by Bacillus amylus Y11[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2019(10): 34-39. | |
| [23] | 王馨慧, 金昊天, 贺兆伟, 等. 醇化片烟多靶标大分子物质降解菌的筛选及降解效果评价[J]. 烟草科技, 2024, 57(11): 65-73. |
| WANG X H, JIN H T, HE Z W, et al. Screening and evaluation of bacteria for multi-target macromolecular substance degradation in aged tobacco strips[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2024, 57(11): 65-73. | |
| [24] | 李正风, 张鹏, 王萝萍, 等. 摩加夫芽孢杆菌产酶条件优化及对烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2023, 44(3): 69-76. |
| LI Z F, ZHANG P, WANG L P, et al. Condition optimization of enzyme production from Bacillus mojavensis in tobacco leaf and its effect for improving tobacco quality[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2023, 44(3): 69-76. | |
| [25] | 刘方玉, 高强, 付沙, 等. 雪茄烟叶发酵工艺及其微生物技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(14): 18-21. |
| LIU F Y, GAO Q, FU S, et al. Research progress on fermentation technology and microbial technology of cigar tobacco leaves[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(14): 18-21. | |
| [26] | 刘毅杰, 腾春风, 臧小平, 等. 响应面优化法提高吸水链霉菌株5-4拮抗香蕉枯萎病菌活性[J]. 中国南方果树, 2023, 52(4): 51-57. |
| LIU Y J, TENG C F, ZANG X P, et al. Improvement of the activity of Anti-Foc TR4 of Streptomyces hygroscopicus sp. 5-4 by response surface methodology[J]. South China Fruits, 2023, 52(4): 51-57. | |
| [27] | 王宁宁, 吴振, 江建梅, 等. 酵母类有机氮源及其在发酵行业的应用[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2014, 13(2): 69-71. |
| WANG N N, WU Z, JIANG J M, et al. Yeast organic nitrogen source and its application in fermentation industry[J]. Industrial & Science Tribune, 2014, 13(2): 69-71. | |
| [28] | 丁翠珍, 裘季燕, 刘伟成, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌B02产生拮抗物质培养基及发酵条件优化[J]. 中国生物防治, 2008, 24(2): 159-163. |
| DING C Z, QIU J Y, LIU W C, et al. Optimization of medial components and cultural conditions for improving antagonistic activity of Bacillus subtilis B02[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2008, 24(2): 159-163. | |
| [29] | 张婷, 罗静雯, 赖雪萍, 等. 产纤维素酶芽孢杆菌的筛选、鉴定及其发酵产酶条件优化[J]. 陕西科技大学学报, 2025, 43(3): 80-86. |
| ZHANG T, LUO J W, LAI X P, et al. Screening, identification, and optimization of fermentation conditions for cellulase-producing Bacillus sp[J]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, 2025, 43(3): 80-86. | |
| [30] | 张传丽, 李同祥, 杨凡, 等. 产淀粉酶和蛋白酶芽孢杆菌的筛选鉴定及其酶学性质分析[J]. 中国酿造, 2023, 42(12): 110-116. |
| ZHANG C L, LI T X, YANG F, et al. Screening and identification of amylase-and protease-producing Bacillus and their enzymatic property analysis[J]. China Brewing, 2023, 42(12): 110-116. | |
| [31] | 黎燕珊, 崔文艳, 张陈芳, 等. 抗金银花白粉病菌贝莱斯芽孢杆菌HC-8菌株培养基及发酵条件优化[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(8): 2148-2157. |
| [1] | 高强, 王丽丽, 张渐隆, 杨波, 李峰, 朱先志, 刘爱新, 韩超, 田雷. 高地芽孢杆菌CY1的分离鉴定及其对烟草黑胫病的防治作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 405-416. |
| [2] | 金鑫, 林瑞, 刘岩, 许嘉盛, 陈琼琳, 袁璐, 薛大伟, 郑鹏, 徐盛春. 烟草ARF-GEF基因NtGNL2a启动子的克隆与表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(10): 2032-2041. |
| [3] | 张斌, 袁志辉, 彭陆军, 周向平, 周德英, 王锡春. 发酵稻壳通过增强氮代谢途径影响烟草幼苗的生长发育[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 237-246. |
| [4] | 张艺, 王丰, 蔡刘体, 汪汉成, 熊晶, 陈兴江. 感赤星病与健康烟叶在腈菌唑应用后的叶际微生态[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 156-167. |
| [5] | 刘光瑞, 宗渊, 李云, 曹东, 刘宝龙, 包雪梅, 李建民. 当归转录因子AsMYB44的克隆与功能研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1253-1264. |
| [6] | 张璐, 李翘楚, 王增利, 丁强, 王鸿磊. 金耳类酵母型菌株分离与高产胞外多糖培养基优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1154-1160. |
| [7] | 黄婉媛, 李彩斌, 彭宇, 李章海, 黄衍章, 丁婷. 烟草根黑腐病拮抗菌的分离鉴定和生防作用特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 873-883. |
| [8] | 杨胜竹, 李响, 李朝文, 陈海念, 刘丽, 陆引罡, 曹卓洋. 贵州省烟草青枯病害区根际土壤养分及酶活性特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 146-155. |
| [9] | 洪森荣, 向琼钰, 谢颖, 熊晨露, 徐晨慧, 徐璐珂, 陈荣华, 蔡红. 怀玉山三叶青烟草病毒增殖蛋白1基因克隆、亚细胞定位和组织表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1193-1204. |
| [10] | 龚伟伟, 赵懿琛, 罗显麟, 杨玲玲, 赵德刚. 花烟草NaD1基因的表达及其启动子序列分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 232-239. |
| [11] | 冯欣欣, 李凤兰, 徐永清, 李磊, 贺付蒙, 冯艳忠, 袁强, 刘娣. 新疆寒冷地区腐木中产纤维素酶菌株的筛选与低温产酶特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1468-1476. |
| [12] | 高汉峰, 刘雨芹, 程亮, 郭青云. 除草活性菌株HL-1产孢发酵条件研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 1042-1048. |
| [13] | 徐秀红, 刘金亮, 李栋成, 刘仁祥. 不同类型烟草种质的烟碱含量变化与相关基因表达水平[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1555-1563. |
| [14] | 俞洁雅, 倪梦萍, 丁良长, 胡洲铭, 肖建中, 郑强. 一株猪粪降解菌的筛选、评价及鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 586-592. |
| [15] | 王应兰, 姜雄, 吉俐, 张景宁, 谢承卫. 基于高效解磷菌的煤矸石肥料制备及其应用潜力分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2035-2041. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||