Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.19

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 932-943.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.19

• Agricultural Economy and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles

Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence

FANG Xiang(), YANG Gangqiao^*(), HUANG Dan

College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2020-09-22 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-05-25
Contact: YANG Gangqiao

Abstract

Abstract:

The essence of rural industrial convergence is to extend the multi-function of agriculture. Analysis into the performance and obstacle factors of rural industrial convergence from the perspective of multi-function of agriculture can provide scientific basis for rural industry development. In the present work, an evaluation system for the multifunctional performance of rural industrial convergence was constructed from the two dimensions of process and result. Based on the survey data collected from 4 typical cases in Hubei Province, which represented 4 business modes of rural industrial convergence (mode Ⅰ, farmer independent business modes; mode Ⅱ, agricultural enterprises/cooperatives business mode; mode Ⅲ-A, “agricultural enterprises+cooperatives+farmers” intermediary mode; Ⅲ-B, “agricultural enterprises+cooperatives+farmers” integrated mode), an empirical study was conducted to analyze the performance and obstacle factors of rural industrial convergence by using TOPSIS method and obstacle degree model. It was shown that there were differences in the multifunctional performance of different business modes of rural industrial convergence. Generally speaking, the “agricultural enterprise+cooperative+farmers” mode (including mode Ⅲ-A and mode Ⅲ-B) had higher performance level than that of mode Ⅱ. More specifically, mode Ⅲ-B had the higher performance level than that of mode Ⅲ-A. Different business modes of rural industrial convergence had different obstacle factors. Mode Ⅰ and mode Ⅱ mainly took rural leisure tourism as the leading industry, and the main obstacle factors affecting multifunctional performance concentrated on agricultural production, processing industry production, and ecosystem services. Mode Ⅲ-A and mode Ⅲ-B mainly took agriculture and processing industry as the leading industry, and the main obstacle factors affecting multifunctional performance were non-agricultural production activities such as tourism services. In order to improve the multifunctional performance of different business modes of rural industrial convergence, agricultural enterprises, agricultural cooperatives and farmers should be guided to establish a stable interest linkage mechanism, focus on multifunctional coordination and develop rural industries in accordance with local conditions.

Key words: rural industrial convergence, multifunctional performance, obstacle factor

CLC Number:

F321.1

FANG Xiang, YANG Gangqiao, HUANG Dan. Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 932-943.

Figures/Tables 5

References 23

[1]	李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟. 经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素: 以江苏省为例[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(6):797-807. DOI
	LI P X, CHEN W, SUN W. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions: a case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(6):797-807.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	徐凯, 房艳刚. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别: 以辽宁省78个区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):482-495. DOI
	XU K, FANG Y G. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):482-495.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	陈秧分, 黄修杰, 王丽娟. 多功能理论视角下的中国乡村振兴与评估[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018,39(6):201-209.
	CHEN Y F, HUANG X J, WANG L J. China’s rural revitalization and its evaluation from the perspective of multifunctional theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,39(6):201-209.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	方世敏, 王海艳. 基于系统论的农业与旅游产业融合: 一种黏性的观点[J]. 经济地理, 2018,38(12):211-218.
	FANG S M, WANG H Y. Agriculture and tourism industry convergence based on system theory: a viewpoint of viscidity[J]. Economic Geography, 2018,38(12):211-218.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	梁树广, 马中东. 农业产业融合的关联度、路径与效应分析[J]. 经济体制改革, 2017 (6):79-84.
	LIANG S G, MA Z D. Analysis on the correlation degree, path and effect of agricultural industry convergence[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2017 (6):79-84.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	陈学云, 程长明. 乡村振兴战略的三产融合路径: 逻辑必然与实证判定[J]. 农业经济问题, 2018,39(11):91-100.
	CHEN X Y, CHENG C M. The route of three industries integration under the strategy of rural revitalization: logical inevitability and empirical judge[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018,39(11):91-100.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	陈林生, 鲍鑫培. 现代都市农业背景下农业产业融合水平测度及评价研究: 以上海为例[J]. 经济问题, 2019 (12):89-95.
	CHEN L S, BAO X P. Research on measurement and evaluation of Shanghai agricultural industry integration level under the background of modern urban agriculture[J]. On Economic Problems, 2019 (12):89-95.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	李治, 王一杰, 胡志全. 农村一、二、三产业融合评价体系的构建与评价: 以北京市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(11):111-120.
	LI Z, WANG Y J, HU Z Q. Construction and evaluation about convergence of primary, secondary and tertiary industries: a case study in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019,40(11):111-120.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	李志勇, 于萌. 旅游产业融合视角下欠发达地区经济发展路径探索[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014 (4):117-124.
	LI Z Y, YU M. Modes of economic development in less developed regions from the perspective of tourism industry integration[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2014 (4):117-124.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	李治, 王东阳. 交易成本视角下农村一二三产业融合发展问题研究[J]. 中州学刊, 2017 (9):54-59.
	LI Z, WANG D Y. Study on convergence of primary, secondary and tertiary industries from the perspective of transaction cost[J]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 2017 (9):54-59.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	李玲玲, 杨坤, 杨建利. 我国农村产业融合发展的效率评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018,39(10):78-85.
	LI L L, YANG K, YANG J L. The efficiency evaluation of the convergence development of agriculture, second industry and third industry in rural area of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,39(10):78-85.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	徐维莉. 农业与二、三产业融合发展评价指标体系构建与验证: 以苏州市为实证[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(4):226-232.
	XU W L. Construction and verification of evaluation index system for the integration development of agriculture and secondary and tertiary industries: a case study of Suzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019,40(4):226-232.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	ZASADA I. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming[J]. Land Use Policy, 2011,28(4):639-648. DOI URL
[14]	BORRELLI I P. Territorial sustainability and multifunctional agriculture: a case study[J]. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2016,8:467-474. DOI URL
[15]	姜长云. 以农业产业化组织推进农村产业融合的经验与对策: 对山东潍坊的调查与思考[J]. 区域经济评论, 2017 (3):75-83.
	JIANG C Y. The experience and measures of guiding the agricultural industrialization organization for promoting rural industry integration: survey and thinking of Weifang City, Shandong Province[J]. Regional Economic Review, 2017 (3):75-83.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	李灿, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013,29(5):217-227.
	LI C, ZHANG F R, ZHU T F, et al. Evaluation and correlation analysis of land use performance based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(5):217-227.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	刘瀛弢, 毛世平. 公益性农业行业科研项目绩效及管理的考评体系研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2010 (12):100-110.
	LIU Y T, MAO S P. Evaluation system on the performance and management of public agricultural industry research projects[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2010 (12):100-110.(in Chinese)
[18]	文高辉, 杨钢桥, 李文静, 等. 基于农民视角的农地整理项目绩效评价及其障碍因子诊断: 以湖北省毛嘴等三个项目为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014,36(1):26-34.
	WEN G H, YANG G Q, LI W J, et al. An evaluation of rural land consolidation projects performance and its obstacle indicators based on farmers’ perspective: a case of 3 projects in Hubei[J]. Resources Science, 2014,36(1):26-34.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	孙新章. 新中国60年来农业多功能性演变的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010,20(1):71-75.
	SUN X Z. Evolution of agricultural multifunctionality since 1949[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2010,20(1):71-75.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	钟源, 刘黎明, 刘星, 等. 农业多功能评价与功能分区研究: 以湖南省为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017,38(3):93-100.
	ZHONG Y, LIU L M, LIU X, et al. Multi function evaluation and functional zoning of agriculture: a case study of Hunan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017,38(3):93-100.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008,23(5):911-919.
	XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	陈曼, 甘臣林, 梅昀, 等. 农户生计视角下农地流转绩效评价及障碍因子诊断: 基于武汉城市圈典型农户调查[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(8):1551-1562.
	CHEN M, GAN C L, MEI Y, et al. Farmland transfer performance and obstacles from the perspective of farmers’ livelihood: based on rural household survey of greater Wuhan Metropolitan Area[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(8):1551-1562.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(7):1092-1103.
	YU L L, CAI Y Y. Performance evaluation and obstacle indicator diagnoses of economic compensation for farmland protection policy based on farmers’ satisfaction[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(7):1092-1103.(in Chinese with English abstract)

目标层 Target layer	准则层 Criterion layer	过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective	指标层 Index layer	量化方法 Quantification method
产业融合多功能绩效 Multifunctional	生产功能绩效 Production	过程视角 Process perspective	X₁:耕园地实际耕种面积占比 Proportion of the actual cultivated area of farmland	耕园地实际耕种面积/耕园地总面积 Actual cultivated area of farmland/total area of farmland
performance of industrial convergence	function performance		X₂:非农产业用地面积占比 Proportion of non-agricultural industrial land area	非农产业占地面积/集体建设用地总面积 Area of non-agricultural industry/total area of collective construction land
			X₃:单位农用地面积的农业投资额 Agricultural investment per unit area of agricultural land	农业投资总额/农用地总面积 Total agricultural investment/total area of agricultural land
			X₄:单位集体建设用地面积的非农投资额 Non-agricultural investment per unit area of collective construction land	非农投资总额/集体建设用地总面积 Total non-agricultural investment/total area of collective construction land
		结果视角 Result perspective	X₅:单位农用地面积的农业产值 Agricultural output value per unit area of agricultural land	农业总产值/农用地总面积 Total agricultural output value/total area of agricultural land
			X₆:单位集体建设用地面积的非农业产值 Non-agricultural output value per unit aera of collective construction land	非农业总产值/集体建设用地总面积 Non-agricultural output value/total area of collective construction land
	生态功能绩效	过程视角 Process	X₇:生态用地面积占比 Proportion of ecological land area	生态用地面积/土地总面积 Ecological land area/total land area
	Ecological function performance	perspective	X₈:单位耕园地面积的农用化学品施用量 Application amount of agricultural chemicals per unit area of farmland	农药化肥农膜施用量/耕园地总面积 Amount of pesticide and fertilizer applied/total area of farmland
			X₉:农村垃圾处理情况 Rural garbage disposal situation	5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best
			X₁₀:农村污水处理情况 Rural sewage treatment situation	5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best
		结果视角 Result perspective	X₁₁:单位生态用地面积的生态系统服务价值 Ecosystem service value per unit area of ecological land	生态系统服务价值/生态用地总面积 Ecosystem service value/total area of ecological land
			X₁₂:农业面源污染情况 Agricultural non-point source pollution	农业面源污染指数/土地总面积 Agricultural non-point source pollution index/total land area
			X₁₃:污染治理满意度 Pollution control satisfaction	5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied
	社会功能绩效	过程视角 Process	X₁₄:本地总就业人数占比 Proportion of total local employment	本地总就业人数/本地总人口数 Total local employment/total local population
	Social function performance	perspective	X₁₅:利益分配情况 Distribution of benefits	5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best
目标层 Target layer	准则层 Criterion layer	过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective	指标层 Index layer	量化方法 Quantification method
		结果视角 Result perspective	X₁₆:村民生活水平 Villagers’ living standard	农村居民总收入/本地总人数 Total income of rural residents/total local population
			X₁₇:民生满意度 Rural people’s livelihood satisfaction	5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied
	休闲功能绩效 Leisure	过程视角 Process perspective	X₁₈:地均农村景观休闲项目数量 Number of rural landscape leisure projects per unit area of land	农村休闲景观项目总数量/土地总面积 Total number of rural landscape leisure projects/total land area
	function performance		X₁₉:餐饮设施接待能力 Reception capacity of catering facilities	接待总桌数/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of reception tables/total area of collective construction land
			X₂₀:住宿设施接待能力 Reception capacity of accommodation facilities	住宿床位总数量/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of accommodation beds/total area of collective construction land
		结果视角 Result	X₂₁:单位面积接收游客人数 Number of visitors per unit area	年接收游客总人数/土地总面积 Total number of tourists/total land area
		perspective	X₂₂:旅游业产值占比 Proportion of tourism industry output value	旅游业产值/农业和非农业总产值 Tourism output value/gross agricultural and non-agricultural output value

目标层 Target layer	准则层 Criterion layer	过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective	指标层 Index layer	量化方法 Quantification method
产业融合多功能绩效 Multifunctional	生产功能绩效 Production	过程视角 Process perspective	X₁:耕园地实际耕种面积占比 Proportion of the actual cultivated area of farmland	耕园地实际耕种面积/耕园地总面积 Actual cultivated area of farmland/total area of farmland
performance of industrial convergence	function performance		X₂:非农产业用地面积占比 Proportion of non-agricultural industrial land area	非农产业占地面积/集体建设用地总面积 Area of non-agricultural industry/total area of collective construction land
			X₃:单位农用地面积的农业投资额 Agricultural investment per unit area of agricultural land	农业投资总额/农用地总面积 Total agricultural investment/total area of agricultural land
			X₄:单位集体建设用地面积的非农投资额 Non-agricultural investment per unit area of collective construction land	非农投资总额/集体建设用地总面积 Total non-agricultural investment/total area of collective construction land
		结果视角 Result perspective	X₅:单位农用地面积的农业产值 Agricultural output value per unit area of agricultural land	农业总产值/农用地总面积 Total agricultural output value/total area of agricultural land
			X₆:单位集体建设用地面积的非农业产值 Non-agricultural output value per unit aera of collective construction land	非农业总产值/集体建设用地总面积 Non-agricultural output value/total area of collective construction land
	生态功能绩效	过程视角 Process	X₇:生态用地面积占比 Proportion of ecological land area	生态用地面积/土地总面积 Ecological land area/total land area
	Ecological function performance	perspective	X₈:单位耕园地面积的农用化学品施用量 Application amount of agricultural chemicals per unit area of farmland	农药化肥农膜施用量/耕园地总面积 Amount of pesticide and fertilizer applied/total area of farmland
			X₉:农村垃圾处理情况 Rural garbage disposal situation	5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best
			X₁₀:农村污水处理情况 Rural sewage treatment situation	5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best
		结果视角 Result perspective	X₁₁:单位生态用地面积的生态系统服务价值 Ecosystem service value per unit area of ecological land	生态系统服务价值/生态用地总面积 Ecosystem service value/total area of ecological land
			X₁₂:农业面源污染情况 Agricultural non-point source pollution	农业面源污染指数/土地总面积 Agricultural non-point source pollution index/total land area
			X₁₃:污染治理满意度 Pollution control satisfaction	5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied
	社会功能绩效	过程视角 Process	X₁₄:本地总就业人数占比 Proportion of total local employment	本地总就业人数/本地总人口数 Total local employment/total local population
	Social function performance	perspective	X₁₅:利益分配情况 Distribution of benefits	5级评分:1,最差;2,较差;3,一般;4,较好;5,最好 5-level scoring: 1, worst; 2, bad; 3, fair; 4, good; 5, best
目标层 Target layer	准则层 Criterion layer	过程/结果视角 Process/result perspective	指标层 Index layer	量化方法 Quantification method
		结果视角 Result perspective	X₁₆:村民生活水平 Villagers’ living standard	农村居民总收入/本地总人数 Total income of rural residents/total local population
			X₁₇:民生满意度 Rural people’s livelihood satisfaction	5级满意度评价:1,非常不满意;2,比较不满意;3,一般;4,比较满意;5,非常满意 Subjective evaluation of 5 levels: 1, very dissatisfied; 2, relatively dissatisfied; 3, fair; 4, relatively satisfied; 5, very satisfied
	休闲功能绩效 Leisure	过程视角 Process perspective	X₁₈:地均农村景观休闲项目数量 Number of rural landscape leisure projects per unit area of land	农村休闲景观项目总数量/土地总面积 Total number of rural landscape leisure projects/total land area
	function performance		X₁₉:餐饮设施接待能力 Reception capacity of catering facilities	接待总桌数/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of reception tables/total area of collective construction land
			X₂₀:住宿设施接待能力 Reception capacity of accommodation facilities	住宿床位总数量/集体建设用地总面积 Total number of accommodation beds/total area of collective construction land
		结果视角 Result	X₂₁:单位面积接收游客人数 Number of visitors per unit area	年接收游客总人数/土地总面积 Total number of tourists/total land area
		perspective	X₂₂:旅游业产值占比 Proportion of tourism industry output value	旅游业产值/农业和非农业总产值 Tourism output value/gross agricultural and non-agricultural output value

指标 Index	小朱湾 Xiaozhuwan Village	杜堂村 Dutang Village	彭墩村 Pengdun Village	马岭村 Maling Village
地貌类型Landform type	低丘陵Low hills	低丘陵Low hills	低丘陵Low hills	低丘陵Low hills
人口Village population	112	1 748	1 159	837
土地面积Land area/hm²	57.60	380.00	1 050.00	397.00
耕园地面积Farmland area/hm²	31.88	70.53	721.07	256.69
GDP/(10⁴ yuan)	1 316.51	1 852.43	9 673.87	3 067.64
人均收入Per capita income/yuan	42 929.96	14 523.90	33 274.37	38 241.65

指标 Index	小朱湾 Xiaozhuwan Village	杜堂村 Dutang Village	彭墩村 Pengdun Village	马岭村 Maling Village
地貌类型Landform type	低丘陵Low hills	低丘陵Low hills	低丘陵Low hills	低丘陵Low hills
人口Village population	112	1 748	1 159	837
土地面积Land area/hm²	57.60	380.00	1 050.00	397.00
耕园地面积Farmland area/hm²	31.88	70.53	721.07	256.69
GDP/(10⁴ yuan)	1 316.51	1 852.43	9 673.87	3 067.64
人均收入Per capita income/yuan	42 929.96	14 523.90	33 274.37	38 241.65

指标 Index	权重 Weight	模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ	模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ	模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A	模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B
X₁	0.027 5	<0.000 1	0.015 6	0.027 5	0.024 1
X₂	0.064 3	0.064 3	0.008 1	0.008 7	<0.000 1
X₃	0.037 0	0.011 9	<0.000 1	0.014 3	0.037 0
X₄	0.093 1	0.093 1	0.004 5	0.003 2	<0.000 1
X₅	0.065 0	0.005 1	<0.000 1	0.012 3	0.065 0
X₆	0.072 3	0.072 3	0.002 6	0.013 9	<0.000 1
X₇	0.026 0	0.025 7	<0.000 1	0.022 6	0.019 8
X₈	0.048 3	0.004 0	<0.000 1	0.044 7	0.048 3
X₉	0.025 2	<0.000 1	0.025 2	0.025 2	0.025 2
X₁₀	0.025 2	0.025 2	<0.000 1	0.025 2	0.025 2
X₁₁	0.050 1	0.003 2	<0.000 1	0.042 0	0.050 1
X₁₂	0.026 3	0.018 0	<0.000 1	0.024 2	0.026 3
X₁₃	0.029 0	0.013 7	<0.000 1	0.022 5	0.029 0
X₁₄	0.043 3	0.005 9	<0.000 1	0.043 3	0.034 0
X₁₅	0.032 8	<0.000 1	0.010 9	0.021 9	0.032 8
X₁₆	0.027 7	0.015 4	<0.000 1	0.025 0	0.027 7
X₁₇	0.036 8	0.009 5	<0.000 1	0.019 9	0.036 8
X₁₈	0.056 3	0.056 3	0.011 0	<0.000 1	0.008 3
X₁₉	0.044 3	0.044 3	0.012 9	0.010 4	<0.000 1
X₂₀	0.050 9	0.050 9	0.016 9	0.006 3	<0.000 1
X₂₁	0.066 3	0.066 3	0.019 0	<0.000 1	0.002 1
X₂₂	0.052 7	0.052 7	0.048 5	0.002 4	<0.000 1

Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 23

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

指标 Index		模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ	模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ	模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A	模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B
生产功能Production function	过程绩效Process performance	0.169 3	0.028 1	0.053 7	0.061 2
	结果绩效Results performance	0.077 5	0.002 6	0.026 2	0.065 0
	小计Subtotal	0.246 8	0.030 7	0.080 0	0.126 1
生态功能Ecological function	过程绩效Process performance	0.054 9	0.025 2	0.117 8	0.118 5
	结果绩效Results performance	0.034 9	<0.000 1	0.088 8	0.105 4
	小计Subtotal	0.089 8	0.025 2	0.206 5	0.223 9
社会功能Social function	过程绩效Process performance	0.005 9	0.010 9	0.065 2	0.066 8
	结果绩效Results performance	0.024 9	<0.000 1	0.044 8	0.064 5
	小计Subtotal	0.030 8	0.0109	0.100 0	0.131 3
休闲功能Leisure function	过程绩效Process performance	0.151 5	0.040 9	0.016 7	0.008 3
	结果绩效Results performance	0.119 0	0.067 5	0.002 4	0.002 1
	小计Subtotal	0.270 5	0.108 4	0.019 0	0.010 4
多功能绩效Multifunctional performance		0.637 8	0.175 2	0.415 5	0.491 6
贴近度Closeness		0.618 4	0.248 1	0.376 6	0.433 1
绩效水平Performance level		良好Good	较差Poor	一般General	一般General

排位 Rank	模式Ⅰ Mode Ⅰ		模式Ⅱ Mode Ⅱ		模式Ⅲ-A Mode Ⅲ-A		模式Ⅲ-B Mode Ⅲ-B
排位 Rank	障碍因素 Obstacle factor	障碍度 Obstacle	障碍因素 Obstacle factor	障碍度 Obstacle	障碍因素 Obstacle factor	障碍度 Obstacle	障碍因素 Obstacle factor	障碍度 Obstacle
1	X₅	0.165 1	X₄	0.107 5	X₄	0.153 8	X₄	0.183 2
2	X₁₁	0.129 3	X₆	0.084 6	X₂₁	0.113 4	X₆	0.142 3
3	X₈	0.122 4	X₅	0.078 8	X₆	0.099 9	X₂	0.126 4
4	X₁₄	0.103 3	X₂	0.068 1	X₁₈	0.096 3	X₂₁	0.126 4
5	X₁₅	0.090 7	X₇	0.060 7	X₂	0.095 1	X₂₂	0.103 6

[1]	WANG Liying, DING Shuyu, LIU Houping. Impact of rural industrial convergence on farmers’ income growth: an empirical study based on spatial effect and threshold effect [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 761-776.
[2]	FU Bin, DOU Xuecheng. Analysis and evaluation of crop variety safety and diagnosis of obstacle factors based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method—Taking Hexi seed production base as an example [J]. , 2017, 29(10): 1611-1619.