Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2295-2303.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.12.09
• Animal Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
TAO Xin(), WU Wanyun, SUN Yuqing, MEN Xiaoming, XU Ziwei*(
)
Received:
2021-06-28
Online:
2021-12-25
Published:
2022-01-10
Contact:
XU Ziwei
CLC Number:
TAO Xin, WU Wanyun, SUN Yuqing, MEN Xiaoming, XU Ziwei. Optimization of Chinese medicine plant extract compounds with orthogonal design[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2295-2303.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.12.09
水平 Level | 因素 Factors | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A厚朴 Magnoliae officinalis cortex | B鸡血藤 Spatholobi caulis | C青蒿 Artemisiae annuae herba | D桂枝 Cinnamomi Ramulus | E石榴皮 Grana Pericarpium | |
1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
3 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
4 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
Table 1 Factors and levels in orthogonal experiment g
水平 Level | 因素 Factors | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A厚朴 Magnoliae officinalis cortex | B鸡血藤 Spatholobi caulis | C青蒿 Artemisiae annuae herba | D桂枝 Cinnamomi Ramulus | E石榴皮 Grana Pericarpium | |
1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
3 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
4 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
Fig. 1 Antibacterial rate of 19 Chinese medicine plant extracts 1, Atractylodis macrocephalae rhizome; 2, Acanthopanacis senticosi Radix etrhizome Seu Caulis;3, Glycyrrhizae radix etrhizome; 4, Cassia Ramulus; 5, Ligustri lucidi fructus; 6, Fraxini cortex; 7, Artemisiae annuae herba; 8, Ginkgo folium leaf; 9, Magnoliae officinalis cortex; 10, Filipendula palmate(Pall) Maxim; 11, Cyperus rotundus L.; 12, Spatholobi caulis; 13, Gynostemma pentaphyllum; 14, Rosmarinus officinalis; 15, Achyranthis bidentatae radix; 16, Grana Pericarpium; 17, Artemisiae capillaris Thunb.; 18, Epimedii folium; 19, Euphorbia helioscopia L. The same as below.
试验号 Number | 因素Factors | 评价指标Evaluation index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | 抑菌率 Antibacterial rate/% | 抗炎率 Anti-inflammatoryrate/% | 抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50value/(mg·mL-1) | |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 34.53±5.988 | 86.90±2.755 | 0.817±0.039 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.73±2.762 | 78.49±2.425 | 0.822±0.043 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9.370±1.931 | 69.54±1.091 | 0.682±0.027 |
4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 36.53±4.651 | 75.06±1.655 | 0.395±0.026 |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 26.95±4.262 | 57.16±1.137 | 0.293±0.018 |
6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 31.74±4.383 | 73.06±3.190 | 0.272±0.018 |
7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 17.82±3.835 | 79.89±0.825 | 0.481±0.039 |
8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 38.52±9.606 | 94.32±0.689 | 0.695±0.021 |
9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 59.08±3.609 | 72.19±0.852 | 0.726±0.035 |
10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 79.44±8.643 | 91.77±0.369 | 2.011±0.056 |
11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8.908±3.602 | 81.67±2.451 | 0.335±0.028 |
12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 79.64±7.162 | 92.81±0.995 | 0.266±0.031 |
13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 60.48±5.215 | 73.47±0.730 | 0.288±0.012 |
14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 28.54±1.521 | 79.68±0.705 | 0.245±0.032 |
15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 81.04±5.463 | 93.47±0.521 | 1.090±0.037 |
16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 71.06±5.624 | 97.53±1.587 | 0.722±0.029 |
Table 2 Antibacterial rate, anti-inflammatory rate and antioxidant IC50 value of 16 extract compounds arranged by orthogonal design
试验号 Number | 因素Factors | 评价指标Evaluation index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | 抑菌率 Antibacterial rate/% | 抗炎率 Anti-inflammatoryrate/% | 抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50value/(mg·mL-1) | |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 34.53±5.988 | 86.90±2.755 | 0.817±0.039 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.73±2.762 | 78.49±2.425 | 0.822±0.043 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9.370±1.931 | 69.54±1.091 | 0.682±0.027 |
4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 36.53±4.651 | 75.06±1.655 | 0.395±0.026 |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 26.95±4.262 | 57.16±1.137 | 0.293±0.018 |
6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 31.74±4.383 | 73.06±3.190 | 0.272±0.018 |
7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 17.82±3.835 | 79.89±0.825 | 0.481±0.039 |
8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 38.52±9.606 | 94.32±0.689 | 0.695±0.021 |
9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 59.08±3.609 | 72.19±0.852 | 0.726±0.035 |
10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 79.44±8.643 | 91.77±0.369 | 2.011±0.056 |
11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8.908±3.602 | 81.67±2.451 | 0.335±0.028 |
12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 79.64±7.162 | 92.81±0.995 | 0.266±0.031 |
13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 60.48±5.215 | 73.47±0.730 | 0.288±0.012 |
14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 28.54±1.521 | 79.68±0.705 | 0.245±0.032 |
15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 81.04±5.463 | 93.47±0.521 | 1.090±0.037 |
16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 71.06±5.624 | 97.53±1.587 | 0.722±0.029 |
因素 Factor | 抑菌率 Antibacterial rate | 抗炎率 Anti-inflammatory rate | 抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50 value | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/ % | k2/ % | k3/ % | k4/ % | R/ % | 最优 水平 The best level | k1/ % | k2/ % | k3/ % | k4/ % | R/ % | 最优 水平 The best level | k1/ (mg· mL-1) | k2/ (mg· mL-1) | k3/ (mg· mL-1) | k4/ (mg· mL-1) | R/ (mg· mL-1) | 最优 水平 The best level | ||
A | 28.54 | 28.76 | 56.77 | 60.28 | 31.74 | 4 | 77.50 | 76.11 | 84.61 | 86.79 | 9.929 | 4 | 0.679 | 0.435 | 0.835 | 0.587 | 0.4 | 2 | |
B | 45.26 | 43.36 | 29.29 | 56.44 | 27.15 | 4 | 72.43 | 80.75 | 81.14 | 89.93 | 17.50 | 4 | 0.531 | 0.838 | 0.647 | 0.519 | 0.319 | 4 | |
C | 36.56 | 55.34 | 33.88 | 48.57 | 21.46 | 2 | 84.79 | 80.48 | 78.93 | 80.05 | 5.857 | 1 | 0.536 | 0.618 | 0.587 | 0.794 | 0.258 | 1 | |
D | 40.13 | 35.41 | 46.71 | 52.1 | 16.69 | 4 | 84.82 | 81.99 | 79.00 | 78.45 | 6.375 | 1 | 0.452 | 0.535 | 0.927 | 0.621 | 0.475 | 1 | |
E | 58.38 | 45.42 | 45.31 | 25.23 | 33.15 | 1 | 91.62 | 82.03 | 77.22 | 73.39 | 18.22 | 1 | 1.153 | 0.688 | 0.377 | 0.317 | 0.836 | 4 |
Table 3 Range analysis of evaluation index on extract compounds arranged by orthogonal design
因素 Factor | 抑菌率 Antibacterial rate | 抗炎率 Anti-inflammatory rate | 抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50 value | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/ % | k2/ % | k3/ % | k4/ % | R/ % | 最优 水平 The best level | k1/ % | k2/ % | k3/ % | k4/ % | R/ % | 最优 水平 The best level | k1/ (mg· mL-1) | k2/ (mg· mL-1) | k3/ (mg· mL-1) | k4/ (mg· mL-1) | R/ (mg· mL-1) | 最优 水平 The best level | ||
A | 28.54 | 28.76 | 56.77 | 60.28 | 31.74 | 4 | 77.50 | 76.11 | 84.61 | 86.79 | 9.929 | 4 | 0.679 | 0.435 | 0.835 | 0.587 | 0.4 | 2 | |
B | 45.26 | 43.36 | 29.29 | 56.44 | 27.15 | 4 | 72.43 | 80.75 | 81.14 | 89.93 | 17.50 | 4 | 0.531 | 0.838 | 0.647 | 0.519 | 0.319 | 4 | |
C | 36.56 | 55.34 | 33.88 | 48.57 | 21.46 | 2 | 84.79 | 80.48 | 78.93 | 80.05 | 5.857 | 1 | 0.536 | 0.618 | 0.587 | 0.794 | 0.258 | 1 | |
D | 40.13 | 35.41 | 46.71 | 52.1 | 16.69 | 4 | 84.82 | 81.99 | 79.00 | 78.45 | 6.375 | 1 | 0.452 | 0.535 | 0.927 | 0.621 | 0.475 | 1 | |
E | 58.38 | 45.42 | 45.31 | 25.23 | 33.15 | 1 | 91.62 | 82.03 | 77.22 | 73.39 | 18.22 | 1 | 1.153 | 0.688 | 0.377 | 0.317 | 0.836 | 4 |
变异来源 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of variation | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F value | P value |
抑菌率 Antibacterial rate | ||||
A | 3 | 3 594.26 | 126.06 | <0.001 |
B | 3 | 894.22 | 31.36 | <0.001 |
C | 3 | 1 226.28 | 43.01 | <0.001 |
D | 3 | 1 438.99 | 50.47 | <0.001 |
E | 3 | 2 834.09 | 99.40 | <0.001 |
误差Error | 32 | 28.51 | — | — |
抗炎率 Anti-inflammatory rate | ||||
A | 3 | 298.33 | 114.46 | <0.001 |
B | 3 | 574.09 | 220.26 | <0.001 |
C | 3 | 79.14 | 30.36 | <0.001 |
D | 3 | 65.26 | 25.04 | <0.001 |
E | 3 | 577.70 | 221.64 | <0.001 |
误差Error | 32 | 2.606 | — | — |
抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50 value | ||||
A | 3 | 0.336 | 318.64 | <0.001 |
B | 3 | 0.114 | 108.29 | <0.001 |
C | 3 | 0.150 | 142.26 | <0.001 |
D | 3 | 0.586 | 555.44 | <0.001 |
E | 3 | 1.458 | 1 383.4 | <0.001 |
误差Error | 32 | 0.001 | — | — |
Table 4 Analysis of variance of factors
变异来源 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of variation | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F value | P value |
抑菌率 Antibacterial rate | ||||
A | 3 | 3 594.26 | 126.06 | <0.001 |
B | 3 | 894.22 | 31.36 | <0.001 |
C | 3 | 1 226.28 | 43.01 | <0.001 |
D | 3 | 1 438.99 | 50.47 | <0.001 |
E | 3 | 2 834.09 | 99.40 | <0.001 |
误差Error | 32 | 28.51 | — | — |
抗炎率 Anti-inflammatory rate | ||||
A | 3 | 298.33 | 114.46 | <0.001 |
B | 3 | 574.09 | 220.26 | <0.001 |
C | 3 | 79.14 | 30.36 | <0.001 |
D | 3 | 65.26 | 25.04 | <0.001 |
E | 3 | 577.70 | 221.64 | <0.001 |
误差Error | 32 | 2.606 | — | — |
抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50 value | ||||
A | 3 | 0.336 | 318.64 | <0.001 |
B | 3 | 0.114 | 108.29 | <0.001 |
C | 3 | 0.150 | 142.26 | <0.001 |
D | 3 | 0.586 | 555.44 | <0.001 |
E | 3 | 1.458 | 1 383.4 | <0.001 |
误差Error | 32 | 0.001 | — | — |
因素 Factor | 水平 Level | 评价指标Evaluation index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
抑菌率 Antibacterial rate% | 抗炎率 Anti-inflammatory rate% | 抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50 value/(mg·mL-1) | ||
A | 1 | 28.54±1.541 b | 77.50±0.446 b | 0.679±0.009 b |
2 | 28.76±1.541 b | 76.11±0.446 c | 0.435±0.009 b | |
3 | 56.77±1.541 a | 87.11±0.446 a | 0.834±0.009 d | |
4 | 60.28±1.541 a | 86.04±0.446 a | 0.586±0.009 c | |
B | 1 | 40.26±1.748 b | 72.08±0.528 c | 0.577±0.011 c |
2 | 40.13±1.748 b | 80.49±0.528 b | 0.753±0.011 a | |
3 | 37.51±1.748 b | 81.75±0.528 b | 0.685±0.011 b | |
4 | 56.44±1.541 a | 89.93±0.466 a | 0.519±0.009 d | |
C | 1 | 36.56±1.541 c | 84.79±0.466 a | 0.536±0.009 c |
2 | 63.57±2.101 a | 81.09±0.635 b | 0.656±0.013 b | |
3 | 30.65±2.101 d | 78.67±0.635 c | 0.503±0.013 c | |
4 | 43.57±2.101 b | 79.70±0.635 bc | 0.840±0.013 a | |
D | 1 | 36.90±1.748 c | 84.56±0.528 a | 0.368±0.011 d |
2 | 30.41±1.748 d | 81.64±0.528 b | 0.581±0.011 c | |
3 | 46.71±1.541 b | 79.00±0.466 c | 0.927±0.009 a | |
4 | 60.33±1.748 a | 79.05±0.528 c | 0.659±0.011 b | |
E | 1 | 66.61±1.748 a | 92.22±0.528 a | 1.191±0.011 a |
2 | 45.42±1.541 b | 82.03±0.466 b | 0.688±0.009 b | |
3 | 40.31±1.748 c | 76.87±0.528 c | 0.423±0.011 c | |
4 | 22.00±1.748 d | 73.14±0.528 d | 0.233±0.011 d |
Table 5 Analysis of variance of each level of factors
因素 Factor | 水平 Level | 评价指标Evaluation index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
抑菌率 Antibacterial rate% | 抗炎率 Anti-inflammatory rate% | 抗氧化IC50值 Antioxidant IC50 value/(mg·mL-1) | ||
A | 1 | 28.54±1.541 b | 77.50±0.446 b | 0.679±0.009 b |
2 | 28.76±1.541 b | 76.11±0.446 c | 0.435±0.009 b | |
3 | 56.77±1.541 a | 87.11±0.446 a | 0.834±0.009 d | |
4 | 60.28±1.541 a | 86.04±0.446 a | 0.586±0.009 c | |
B | 1 | 40.26±1.748 b | 72.08±0.528 c | 0.577±0.011 c |
2 | 40.13±1.748 b | 80.49±0.528 b | 0.753±0.011 a | |
3 | 37.51±1.748 b | 81.75±0.528 b | 0.685±0.011 b | |
4 | 56.44±1.541 a | 89.93±0.466 a | 0.519±0.009 d | |
C | 1 | 36.56±1.541 c | 84.79±0.466 a | 0.536±0.009 c |
2 | 63.57±2.101 a | 81.09±0.635 b | 0.656±0.013 b | |
3 | 30.65±2.101 d | 78.67±0.635 c | 0.503±0.013 c | |
4 | 43.57±2.101 b | 79.70±0.635 bc | 0.840±0.013 a | |
D | 1 | 36.90±1.748 c | 84.56±0.528 a | 0.368±0.011 d |
2 | 30.41±1.748 d | 81.64±0.528 b | 0.581±0.011 c | |
3 | 46.71±1.541 b | 79.00±0.466 c | 0.927±0.009 a | |
4 | 60.33±1.748 a | 79.05±0.528 c | 0.659±0.011 b | |
E | 1 | 66.61±1.748 a | 92.22±0.528 a | 1.191±0.011 a |
2 | 45.42±1.541 b | 82.03±0.466 b | 0.688±0.009 b | |
3 | 40.31±1.748 c | 76.87±0.528 c | 0.423±0.011 c | |
4 | 22.00±1.748 d | 73.14±0.528 d | 0.233±0.011 d |
Fig. 4 Anti-inflammatory effect and antioxidant effect of plant extract compounds A, Anti-inflammatory effect; B,Antioxidant effect. Data on the bars with different lowercase letters meant significant differences (P<0.05).
[1] |
ABREU A C, MCBAIN A J, SIMÕES M. Plants as sources of new antimicrobials and resistance-modifying agents[J]. Natural Product Reports, 2012, 29(9): 1007-1021.
DOI URL |
[2] |
TAO X, SUN Y Q, MEN X M, et al. A compound plant extract and its antibacterial and antioxidant properties in vitro and in vivo[J]. 3 Biotech, 2020, 10(12): 1-10.
DOI URL |
[3] | 陶新, 孙雨晴, 门小明, 等. 复合植物提取物替代饲用抗生素对断奶仔猪生长性能和血清指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(1): 163-169. |
TAO X, SUN Y Q, MEN X M, et al. Effects of composite plant extracts replacing feed antibiotics on growth performance and serum indexes of weaned piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(1): 163-169.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 周子雄, 黄庆华, 朱爽, 等. 酶标仪快速测定抗菌物质抑菌活性方法的建立[J]. 微生物前沿, 2014, 3(2): 29-35. |
ZHOU Z X, HUANG Q H, ZHU S, et al. Establishment of rapid determining method for antibacterial activity by microplate reader[J]. Advances in Microbiology, 2014, 3(2): 29-35. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[5] |
GÜLLÜCE M, SÖKMEN M, DAFERERA D, et al. In vitro antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and methanol extracts of herbal parts and callus cultures of Satureja hortensis L[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51(14): 3958-3965.
DOI URL |
[6] |
BANERJEE S. Inhibition of mackerel (Scomber scombrus) muscle lipoxygenase by green tea polyphenols[J]. Food Research International, 2006, 39(4): 486-491.
DOI URL |
[7] |
EL-GHORAB A H, MAHGOUB M H, BEKHETA M. Effect of some bioregulators on the chemical composition of essential oil and its antioxidant activity of Egyptian carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)[J]. Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, 2006, 9(3): 214-222.
DOI URL |
[8] | HUSSAIN T, TAN B, YIN Y L, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation: what polyphenols can do for us?[J]. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2016, 2016: 7432797. |
[9] |
OZDAL T, SELA D A, XIAO J B, et al. The reciprocal interactions between polyphenols and gut microbiota and effects on bioaccessibility[J]. Nutrients, 2016, 8(2): 78.
DOI URL |
[10] |
BAHARFAR R, AZIMI R, MOHSENI M. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of flavonoid-, polyphenol-and anthocyanin-rich extracts from Thymus kotschyanus boiss & hohen aerial parts[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2015, 52(10): 6777-6783.
DOI URL |
[11] | 黄其春, 黄翠琴, 陈彤, 等. 银杏叶提取物对断奶仔猪生长性能、肠黏膜形态及屏障通透性的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2014, 50(19): 74-77. |
HUANG Q C, HUANG C Q, CHEN T, et al. Effects of Ginkgo biloba extract on growth performance, intestinal mucosal morphology and barrier permeability in weaned piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 50(19): 74-77.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | LIU G, GUAN G P, FANG J, et al. Macleaya cordata extract decreased diarrhea score and enhanced intestinal barrier function in growing piglets[J]. BioMed Research International, 2016, 2016: 1069585. |
[13] |
HAO Y, LI D F, PIAO X L, et al. Forsythia suspensa extract alleviates hypersensitivity induced by soybean β-conglycinin in weaned piglets[J]. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2010, 128(2): 412-418.
DOI URL |
[14] | 韩杰, 张飞, 边连全. 刺五加多糖对免疫应激断奶仔猪免疫器官指数、粪便微生物菌群数量和胃肠道pH的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(8): 2314-2319. |
HAN J, ZHANG F, BIAN L Q. Effects of Acanthopanax senticosus polysaccharide on immune organ indexes, counts of fecal microflora and gastrointestinal pH of immune challenged weaner piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014, 26(8): 2314-2319.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] |
MALVIYA S, ARVIND, JHA A, et al. Antioxidant and antibacterial potential of pomegranate peel extracts[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2014, 51(12): 4132-4137.
DOI URL |
[16] | MASTROGIOVANNI F, MUKHOPADHYA A, LACETERA N, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of pomegranate peel extracts on in vitro human intestinal caco-2 cells and ex vivo porcine colonic tissue explants[J]. Nutrients, 2019, 11(3): E548. |
[17] | 孙雨晴. 复合植物提取物的组方、安全性评价及其在小鼠上的应用研究[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2012. |
SUN Y Q. The components, safety evaluation, and application study on mouse of the compound plant extracts[D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 朱心红, 沈群, 高天明. 中药成分组合效应假说及实验研究[J]. 中草药, 2004, 35(2): 122-124. |
ZHU X H, SHEN Q, GAO T M. Verification on hypojournal for optimum ratio in various active constituents of Chinese materia medica with desired effects[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2004, 35(2): 122-124.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 刘岳, 李梦云, 郑寅, 等. 复方头孢泊肟酯纳米乳的研制及其药效与安全性研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2015, 46(6): 1026-1036. |
LIU Y, LI M Y, ZHENG Y, et al. Preparation, efficacy and safety evaluation of compound nanoemulsion of cefpodoxime proxetil[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2015, 46(6): 1026-1036.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | ZHENG Gang, GU Cuihua, WANG Jie, LIN Lin. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and several physiological and biochemical indexes of Heimia myrtifolia Cham.et Schlechtend. [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1650-1659. |
[2] | JIANG Yuhang, XIN Weigang, ZHANG Qili, DENG Xianyu, WANG Feng, LIN Lianbing. Isolation and identification of fungi from mildewed feed corn and study on anti-mildew and antifungal effects of lactobacillin [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1283-1291. |
[3] | LI Yu, LIU Cuijun, AI Lunqiang, FANG Xinyue, LIU Yu, YUAN Mingyuan, RAN Yalan, HE Meijun. Study on volatile components and antibacterial activity of ethyl acetate component of Fritillaria hupehensis Hsiao et K. C. Hsia [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(6): 1088-1094. |
[4] | LI Xue, ZHANG Yu, WANG Junhong, ZHU Zuoyi, SUN Suling, LIU Zhi, ZHU Shenlong, SHEN Guoxin, Agusti ROMERO, WANG Wei. UPLC-FLD determination and antioxidant activity of polyphenols in virgin olive oil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 907-915. |
[5] | YUE Denggao, CHENG Liang, GUO Qingyun. Antibacterial activities and optimization of fermentation conditions of lipopeptides produced by Aureobasidium pullulans PA-2 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 479-489. |
[6] | TANG Xiaoshu, HU Bo, CHEN Xuemei, ZHANG Baixi. Study on black chokeberry juicing processing and its quality evaluation [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2406-2414. |
[7] | ZHAO Hua, REN Qingwen, WANG Xiyu, LI Zhenni, TANG Xiumei, JIANG Lihui, LIU Peng, XING Chenghua. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on antioxidant enzymes activities and photosynthetic characteristics of Solanum lycopersicum L. under salt stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(11): 2075-2084. |
[8] | WANG Xian, LIU Fang, WEI Xiaohong, ZHU Xiaolin, WANG Baoqiang. Study on resistance of different tomato germplasm materials to yellow leaf curl virus disease [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(11): 2085-2097. |
[9] | LIAN Huashan, LI Xinxin, LIN Lijin, LIAO Ming’an. Study on epibrassinolide (EBR) on growth and physiological response of Summer Black grape seedlings [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1889-1896. |
[10] | SHI Jing, LIU Dongyang, ZHANG Fenghua. Physiological response and salt tolerance mechanism of cotton seedlings to salt stress [J]. , 2020, 32(7): 1141-1148. |
[11] | LI Yuancheng, SUN Hong, WU Yifei, YAO Xiaohong, SHEN Qi, TANG Jiangwu. Nutritional components and antioxidant activity of solid-state fermented cottonseed kernel [J]. , 2020, 32(4): 610-615. |
[12] | LIU Xinyu, CHEN Peng, ZHANG Guanghui, ZHAO Junjie, LI Bohao, ZHANG Nan, SUN Weike, XU Juanjuan, YE Xingtao, WEI Jinpeng, YU Gaobo. Effect of exogenous proline on degradation of residual chlorothalonil in tomato [J]. , 2020, 32(3): 437-446. |
[13] | BIAN Jianwen, CUI Yan, YANG Songqi, LUO Guanghong, MENG Xiangang. Effects of Chlamydomonas debaryana Gor. and Anabaena azotica Ley. on wheat seedling growth under salt stress [J]. , 2020, 32(10): 1748-1756. |
[14] | YANG Zhi, LI Wenyi, GAO Yuntao, XIONG Huabin, CHEN Yijian, YANG Huijuan. Optimization of extraction process of total flavonoids from Acerola cherry by response surface methodology and their antioxidant activities [J]. , 2020, 32(10): 1866-1872. |
[15] | PANG Qiangqiang, ZHOU Man, SUN Xiaodong, ZHANG Wen, CAI Xinglai. Evaluation of heat tolerance and response of enzymatic antioxidant system to heat stress in Brassica parachinensis L. [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 72-79. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||