Abstract:

Based on the background of the super ministry system reform, different supervision models of agricultural natural resource assets were compared with analytical paradigm of law and economics, by taking the consistency of supply and demand and cost-benefit as analysis tool. Supervision model of agricultural natural resource assets should be aimed at achieving the balance between supply and demand, to ensure the cost is proportional to the gain. Results show that, from the point of participants, compared with the unilateral supervision model, the matching degree of supply and demand in multiple supervision is higher in consistency of legal systems and feasibility of legal norms. From the point of supervision form, compared with the decentralized supervision model, the comprehensive supervision could obtain greater benefits at lower costs. Realization of multiple comprehensive supervision of agricultural natural resource assets should endow multiple subjects such as government, market and society with the right (power) to govern together, build mechanisms of public participation, in order to maintain social security and maximize the social utility.

Key words: agricultural natural resource assets, supervision model, law and economics, comprehensive supervision, multiple supervision