Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 146-155.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.16
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Shengzhu1(), LI Xiang1, LI Chaowen1,2, CHEN Hainian1, LIU Li1,2,*(
), LU Yingang1,2,3, CAO Zhuoyang4
Received:
2021-09-21
Online:
2023-01-25
Published:
2023-02-21
CLC Number:
YANG Shengzhu, LI Xiang, LI Chaowen, CHEN Hainian, LIU Li, LU Yingang, CAO Zhuoyang. Characteristics of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in rhizosphere of tobacco affected by bacterial wilt in Guizhou Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 146-155.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.01.16
Fig.2 Basic information of sampling locations The map was made based on the standard map [map No. GS(2019)1822] downloaded from the standard map service website of State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping. The base map was unchanged.
养分 Nutrients | 处理Treatments | P | 植烟土壤适宜养分含量 Suitable nutrient content of tobacco planting soil | |
---|---|---|---|---|
H | D | |||
OM/(g·kg-1) | 25.06±2.13 | 31.73±2.95 | ** | 15~30[ |
CEC/ (cmol·kg-1) | 16.40±1.11 | 18.48±1.24 | ** | 10~20[ |
TN/(g·kg-1) | 1.21±0.10 | 1.63±0.10 | ** | 1.0~2.0[ |
AN/(mg·kg-1) | 103.20±5.53 | 138.85±12.06 | ** | 60~120[ |
TP/(g·kg-1) | 0.90±0.06 | 1.07±0.08 | * | 0.4~1.0[ |
TK/(g·kg-1) | 14.49±1.47 | 15.65±1.61 | ** | 10.0~25.0[ |
AK/(mg·kg-1) | 274.86±26.30 | 399.10±26.67 | ** | 150~220[ |
AP/(mg·kg-1) | 18.28±3.27 | 13.53±1.94 | ** | 10~20[ |
pH | 6.01±0.27 | 5.73±0.24 | * | 5.5~7.0[ |
Table 1 The nutrients difference between healthy (H) and diseased (D) tobacco rhizosphere soil
养分 Nutrients | 处理Treatments | P | 植烟土壤适宜养分含量 Suitable nutrient content of tobacco planting soil | |
---|---|---|---|---|
H | D | |||
OM/(g·kg-1) | 25.06±2.13 | 31.73±2.95 | ** | 15~30[ |
CEC/ (cmol·kg-1) | 16.40±1.11 | 18.48±1.24 | ** | 10~20[ |
TN/(g·kg-1) | 1.21±0.10 | 1.63±0.10 | ** | 1.0~2.0[ |
AN/(mg·kg-1) | 103.20±5.53 | 138.85±12.06 | ** | 60~120[ |
TP/(g·kg-1) | 0.90±0.06 | 1.07±0.08 | * | 0.4~1.0[ |
TK/(g·kg-1) | 14.49±1.47 | 15.65±1.61 | ** | 10.0~25.0[ |
AK/(mg·kg-1) | 274.86±26.30 | 399.10±26.67 | ** | 150~220[ |
AP/(mg·kg-1) | 18.28±3.27 | 13.53±1.94 | ** | 10~20[ |
pH | 6.01±0.27 | 5.73±0.24 | * | 5.5~7.0[ |
Fig.3 The nutrients difference between healthy (H) and diseased (D) tobacco rhizosphere soil in different climates Different lowercase letters above the bars meaned significant difference at the level of 0.05 among treatments. TZ, Tianzhu; KY, Kaiyang; WN, Weining. The same as below.
处理Treatment | CAT/(mL·g-1·20 min-1) | Ure/(mg·g-1·24 h-1) | Pho/(mg·g-1·24 h-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TZ | H | 1.59±0.17 b | 0.38±0.05 c | 3.02±0.56 bc |
D | 1.51±0.15 b | 0.45±0.02 c | 2.86±0.50 bc | |
KY | H | 2.03±0.17 a | 1.18±0.14 a | 1.51±0.27 c |
D | 2.18±0.15 a | 0.68±0.14 b | 2.46±0.56 c | |
WN | H | 1.25±0.16 c | 0.62±0.05 b | 5.90±0.84 a |
D | 1.68±0.14 b | 0.59±0.04 b | 4.22±1.20 b | |
H | 1.62±0.12 b | 0.73±0.35 a | 3.47 a | |
D | 1.79±0.11 a | 0.57±0.12 b | 3.18 a |
Table 2 Difference of enzyme activities between healthy (H) and diseased (D) tobacco rhizosphere soil
处理Treatment | CAT/(mL·g-1·20 min-1) | Ure/(mg·g-1·24 h-1) | Pho/(mg·g-1·24 h-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TZ | H | 1.59±0.17 b | 0.38±0.05 c | 3.02±0.56 bc |
D | 1.51±0.15 b | 0.45±0.02 c | 2.86±0.50 bc | |
KY | H | 2.03±0.17 a | 1.18±0.14 a | 1.51±0.27 c |
D | 2.18±0.15 a | 0.68±0.14 b | 2.46±0.56 c | |
WN | H | 1.25±0.16 c | 0.62±0.05 b | 5.90±0.84 a |
D | 1.68±0.14 b | 0.59±0.04 b | 4.22±1.20 b | |
H | 1.62±0.12 b | 0.73±0.35 a | 3.47 a | |
D | 1.79±0.11 a | 0.57±0.12 b | 3.18 a |
Fig.4 Correlation analysis of nutrients, enzyme activity and altitude of healthy (H) and diseased (D) tobacco rhizosphere soil The upper right corner indicated the P value, *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001; P>0.05 without *, the lower left corner indicated the correlation coefficient. Alt, altitude.
指标Index | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CEC | 0.98 | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.08 |
AP | -0.78 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
Alt | 0.72 | -0.56 | 0.29 | -0.06 |
pH | 0.71 | 0.45 | -0.43 | 0.25 |
Ure | 0.67 | 0.40 | -0.56 | 0.10 |
TP | 0.58 | -0.13 | 0.20 | -0.10 |
OM | -0.02 | -0.79 | 0.43 | 0.29 |
TK | 0.08 | 0.75 | -0.40 | -0.01 |
TN | -0.35 | 0.75 | 0.19 | 0.30 |
Pho | 0.17 | -0.74 | 0.45 | 0.05 |
AK | -0.18 | 0.14 | -0.84 | -0.19 |
CAT | 0.03 | 0.30 | -0.79 | 0.26 |
AN | -0.08 | -0.03 | -0.03 | 0.96 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.82 | 3.63 | 1.29 | 1.00 |
方差贡献 | 3.58 | 3.33 | 2.53 | 1.29 |
Variance contribution | ||||
累积贡献率 | 27.53 | 53.17 | 72.65 | 82.60 |
Cumulative contribution/% |
Table 3 Factor variance contribution rate and rotation factor loading matrix of healthy tobacco rhizosphere soil
指标Index | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CEC | 0.98 | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.08 |
AP | -0.78 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
Alt | 0.72 | -0.56 | 0.29 | -0.06 |
pH | 0.71 | 0.45 | -0.43 | 0.25 |
Ure | 0.67 | 0.40 | -0.56 | 0.10 |
TP | 0.58 | -0.13 | 0.20 | -0.10 |
OM | -0.02 | -0.79 | 0.43 | 0.29 |
TK | 0.08 | 0.75 | -0.40 | -0.01 |
TN | -0.35 | 0.75 | 0.19 | 0.30 |
Pho | 0.17 | -0.74 | 0.45 | 0.05 |
AK | -0.18 | 0.14 | -0.84 | -0.19 |
CAT | 0.03 | 0.30 | -0.79 | 0.26 |
AN | -0.08 | -0.03 | -0.03 | 0.96 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.82 | 3.63 | 1.29 | 1.00 |
方差贡献 | 3.58 | 3.33 | 2.53 | 1.29 |
Variance contribution | ||||
累积贡献率 | 27.53 | 53.17 | 72.65 | 82.60 |
Cumulative contribution/% |
指标Index | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
TP | 0.85 | -0.04 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
Alt | 0.82 | 0.08 | -0.46 | 0.23 |
TN | -0.76 | 0.17 | -0.09 | 0.07 |
AP | -0.75 | 0.13 | 0.35 | -0.28 |
CEC | 0.70 | -0.63 | -0.25 | 0.07 |
Ure | 0.31 | -0.82 | -0.21 | -0.04 |
TK | -0.32 | -0.72 | 0.31 | -0.16 |
pH | 0.37 | -0.71 | 0.05 | 0.35 |
OM | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.33 | 0.19 |
CAT | 0.20 | -0.70 | 0.15 | -0.02 |
Pho | 0.00 | 0.20 | -0.87 | -0.13 |
AN | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
AK | -0.16 | 0.05 | 0.53 | -0.72 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.60 | 3.21 | 1.37 | 1.12 |
方差贡献 | 3.64 | 3.17 | 1.82 | 1.67 |
Variance contribution | ||||
累积贡献率 | 28.00 | 52.37 | 66.39 | 79.21 |
Cumulative contribution/% |
Table 4 Factor variance contribution rate and rotation factor loading matrix of diseased tobacco rhizosphere soil
指标Index | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
TP | 0.85 | -0.04 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
Alt | 0.82 | 0.08 | -0.46 | 0.23 |
TN | -0.76 | 0.17 | -0.09 | 0.07 |
AP | -0.75 | 0.13 | 0.35 | -0.28 |
CEC | 0.70 | -0.63 | -0.25 | 0.07 |
Ure | 0.31 | -0.82 | -0.21 | -0.04 |
TK | -0.32 | -0.72 | 0.31 | -0.16 |
pH | 0.37 | -0.71 | 0.05 | 0.35 |
OM | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.33 | 0.19 |
CAT | 0.20 | -0.70 | 0.15 | -0.02 |
Pho | 0.00 | 0.20 | -0.87 | -0.13 |
AN | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
AK | -0.16 | 0.05 | 0.53 | -0.72 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.60 | 3.21 | 1.37 | 1.12 |
方差贡献 | 3.64 | 3.17 | 1.82 | 1.67 |
Variance contribution | ||||
累积贡献率 | 28.00 | 52.37 | 66.39 | 79.21 |
Cumulative contribution/% |
因素Factors | 发生类别Category | ||
---|---|---|---|
判别因子变量 Discriminant variable (X) | X对应的土壤指标 X corresponding soil index | 健康Y1 Healthy Y1 | 患病Y2 Diseased Y2 |
X0 | - | -39.387 | -69.265 |
X1 | pH | 0.328 | -5.270 |
X3 | CEC | 1.725 | 3.233 |
X4 | TN | 16.995 | 25.353 |
X5 | AN | 0.128 | 0.227 |
X9 | AK | 0.054 | 0.091 |
Table 5 Stepwise discriminant function coefficient table
因素Factors | 发生类别Category | ||
---|---|---|---|
判别因子变量 Discriminant variable (X) | X对应的土壤指标 X corresponding soil index | 健康Y1 Healthy Y1 | 患病Y2 Diseased Y2 |
X0 | - | -39.387 | -69.265 |
X1 | pH | 0.328 | -5.270 |
X3 | CEC | 1.725 | 3.233 |
X4 | TN | 16.995 | 25.353 |
X5 | AN | 0.128 | 0.227 |
X9 | AK | 0.054 | 0.091 |
[1] |
孙悦, 徐兴良, KUZYAKOV Yakov. 根际激发效应的发生机制及其生态重要性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(1): 62-75.
DOI |
SUN Y, XU X L, YAKOV K. Mechanisms of rhizosphere priming effects and their ecological significance[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(1): 62-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[2] |
马志良, 赵文强, 刘美, 等. 增温对高寒灌丛根际和非根际土壤微生物生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(6): 1893-1900.
DOI |
MA Z L, ZHAO W Q, LIU M, et al. Effects of warming on microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and bulk soil in an alpine scrub ecosystem[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(6): 1893-1900. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | ZHANG F S, SHEN J B, ZHANG J L, et al. Rhizosphere processes and management for improving nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity: implications for China[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2010, 107: 1-32. |
[4] | 李雪萍, 李建宏, 漆永红, 等. 青稞根腐病对根际土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17): 5640-5649. |
LI X P, LI J H, QI Y H, et al. Effects of naked barley root rot on rhizosphere soil microorganisms and enzyme activity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(17): 5640-5649. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 褚德朋, 许永幸, 高强, 等. 海藻多糖与有机物料对烟草青枯病的防控效果[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(4): 58-65. |
CHU D P, XU Y X, GAO Q, et al. Control effect of seaweed polysaccharides and organic materials on tobacco bacterial wilt[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2020, 41(4): 58-65. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | QI G F, MA G Q, CHEN S, et al. Microbial network and soil properties are changed in bacterial wilt-susceptible soil[J/OL]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2019, 85(13). . |
[7] |
WANG R, ZHANG H C, SUN L G, et al. Microbial community composition is related to soil biological and chemical properties and bacterial wilt outbreak[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 343.
DOI PMID |
[8] | 黎妍妍, 覃光炯, 王林, 等. 清江流域烟区烟草青枯病发生的土壤营养因素分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(4): 656-661. |
LI Y Y, QIN G J, WANG L, et al. Soil nutrient elements affecting the occurrence of tobacco bacterial wilt in Qingjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018, 49(4): 656-661. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 郑世燕, 陈弟军, 丁伟, 等. 烟草青枯病发病烟株根际土壤营养状况分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(4): 57-64. |
ZHENG S Y, CHEN D J, DING W, et al. Nutritional status of rhizosphere soil around bacterial wilt diseased tobacco plant[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2014, 20(4): 57-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 万川, 蒋珍茂, 赵秀兰, 等. 深翻和施用土壤改良剂对烟草青枯病发生的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2015, 48(2): 11-15,26. |
WAN C, JIANG Z M, ZHAO X L, et al. Effects of deep-ploughing and soil amendment application on incidence of tobacco bacterial wilt[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2015, 48(2): 11-15,26. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 闫新甫, 孔劲松, 罗安娜, 等. 近20年全国烤烟产区种植规模消长变化分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(4): 92-101. |
YAN X F, KONG J S, LUO A N, et al. Changes in planting scale of flue-cured tobacco production regions in China in recent 20 years[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2021, 42(4): 92-101. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 胡吉凤, 谷小平, 刘健锋, 等. 贵州省不同气候区烟草青枯病发生现状研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(21): 88-90. |
HU J F, GU X P, LIU J F, et al. Occurring situation of tobacco bacterial wilt in different climatic regions of Guizhou Province[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 40(21): 88-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 滕凯, 陈前锋, 周志成, 等. 烟草连作障碍与土壤理化性质及微生物多样性特征的关联[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(9): 2848-2856. |
TENG K, CHEN Q F, ZHOU Z C, et al. Effect of soil physical and chemical properties and microbial community on continuous cropping obstacles in tobacco field[J]. Microbiology China, 2020, 47(9): 2848-2856. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] |
ZHANG X H, LANG D Y, ZHANG E H, et al. Diurnal changes in photosynthesis and antioxidants of Angelica sinensis as influenced by cropping systems[J]. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(2): 252-258.
DOI URL |
[15] | 冯洁. 植物病原细菌分类最新进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2305-2314. |
FENG J. Recent advances in taxonomy of plant pathogenic bacteria[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(12): 2305-2314. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 25-169. |
[17] | 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986: 274-276. |
[18] | 刘国顺. 烟草栽培学[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017: 179-181. |
[19] | 石媛媛, 邓明军, 林北森, 等. 基于GIS和地统计学的百色植烟土壤养分空间分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(8): 1403-1409. |
SHI Y Y, DENG M J, LIN B S, et al. Spatial analysis of tobacco soil nutrients in Baise based on GIS and geostatistics[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2014, 45(8): 1403-1409. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 吕倩, 康文斯, 郭茂金, 等. 柏木人工林目标树经营初期对林下植物多样性及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(5): 1036-1043. |
LYU Q, KANG W S, GUO M J, et al. Early effects of target tree management on undergrowth plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties in Cupressus funebris plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(5): 1036-1043. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 马海宾, 王胜坤, 陆俊锟, 等. 桉树青枯病林地根际土壤营养分析[J]. 桉树科技, 2016, 33(4): 9-13. |
MA H B, WANG S K, LU J K, et al. Analyses of rhizosphere soil nutrition in Eucalyptus plantations affected by bacterial wilt disease[J]. Eucalypt Science & Technology, 2016, 33(4): 9-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 陆景陵. 植物营养学-上册[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003. |
[23] | WILLIAMS J, SMITH S G. Correcting potassium deficiency can reduce rice stem diseases[J]. Better Crops, 2001, 85(1): 7-9. |
[24] | 王贻鸿, 赵云峰, 孔凡玉, 等. 不同pH下胞外多糖和脂多糖对烟草青枯菌根部定殖的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2017, 38(5): 24-31. |
WANG Y H, ZHAO Y F, KONG F Y, et al. Effect of exopolysaccharides and lipopolysaccride on colonization of tobacco roots by Ralstonia solanacearum at different pH values[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2017, 38(5): 24-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 游春梅, 陆晓菊, 官会林. 三七设施栽培根腐病害与土壤酶活性的关联性[J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 34(6): 25-29. |
YOU C M, LU X J, GUAN H L. The relevance of notoginseng root rot to the enzyme activity in soil[J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2014, 34(6): 25-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 莫雪, 陈斐杰, 游冲, 等. 黄河三角洲不同植物群落土壤酶活性特征及影响因子分析[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(2): 895-904. |
MO X, CHEN F J, YOU C, et al. Characteristics and factors of soil enzyme activity for different plant communities in Yellow River Delta[J]. Environmental Science, 2020, 41(2): 895-904. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] |
FAN Z Z, LU S Y, LIU S, et al. The effects of vegetation restoration strategies and seasons on soil enzyme activities in the Karst landscapes of Yunnan, southwest China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020, 31(5): 1949-1957.
DOI URL |
[28] | 池再香, 龙先菊, 晏理华, 等. 贵州东部中亚热带季风湿润区椪柑气候区划[J]. 气象, 2008, 34(11): 101-105. |
CHI Z X, LONG X J, YAN L H, et al. Climatic regionalization of Citrus in the middle subtropical monsoon wetness areas of eastern Guizhou Province[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2008, 34(11): 101-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 吴则焰, 林文雄, 陈志芳, 等. 武夷山不同海拔植被带土壤微生物PLFA分析[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(7): 105-112. |
WU Z Y, LIN W X, CHEN Z F, et al. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soil microbes at different elevation of Wuyi mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(7): 105-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | SONG Biqing, YANG Xiaodong, ZHENG Yunye, WANG Guoping, XU Shengchun, ZHAO Yan, ZHAO Shanshan, MA Yuxuan, LI Sujuan. Evaluation of physicochemical properties, fatty acids and volatile components of different tobacco seed oils [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1152-1161. |
[2] | SUN Wenyan, LIU Xiaogang, ZHANG Wenhui, LI Huiyong, WU Lang, YANG Qiliang, XIONG Guomei. Optimization of drip fertigation scheme for Coffea arabica based on soil quality index [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 566-573. |
[3] | LI Xinyan, WANG Fangling, ZHANG Mingyue, SHAO Zhihui, WANG Jun, YANG Weili, ZHAO Mingqin. Effects of water retaining agent on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and neutral aroma substances content in cigar tobacco leaves under drought stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2610-2621. |
[4] | ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, WANG Dongwang, LIANG Yonghui, LIU Ruhua. Effect of water-fertilizer interaction on yield, quality and soil nutrients of drip irrigated jujube [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2428-2437. |
[5] | GAO Zhiyuan, YANG Shuna, WANG Zhaoli, WANG Zhihao, XI Xinyan, HE Juan, JIA Huijuan. Effects of different fumigation on continuous cropping soil in peach orchard [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2251-2258. |
[6] | CHEN Gui, ZHOU Jiewen, LI Haiping, ZHANG Faming, LI Chunshun, LIU Li, ZHANG Y. Effects of soil conditioner application on pH value of acidified soil and root characteristics of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1275-1282. |
[7] | LI Qingbin, QIN Benben, LI Yingying, FAN Kaifeng, YANG Dong, CHEN Lei, LIU Kun. Effects of continuous rain and sunless weather on microclimate, strawberry growth and quality in greenhouse [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 831-839. |
[8] | FAN Linjuan, LIU Zirong, XU Xueliang, WANG Fenshan, PENG Deliang, YAO Yingjuan. Effects of six kinds of nematicides on soil microbial population, enzymes activities and nutrients in replanted Chinese yam field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 506-515. |
[9] | SUI Xiran, WANG Yan, LIU Yungen, ZHANG Yajie, WU Lifang. Responses of soil nutrients and microbial community to altitude in typical Pinus yunnanensis forest at rocky desertification region [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2348-2357. |
[10] | XIONG Tinghao, HUANG Yiguo, ZHOU Xuan, LU Yanhong, ZI Tao, HU Yuqian, SONG Haixing. Evaluation on soil nutrients and heavy metals pollution risk in main producing areas of rapeseed in Hunan Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1904-1912. |
[11] | CHEN Gui, LU Chenni, SHI Yanping, NI Xiongwei, CHENG Wangda, ZHANG Hongmei, WANG Baojun, ZHANG Liping, SUN Da. Effect of different controlled-release fertilizers with urea ammonium on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nutrients of rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 122-130. |
[12] | XU Xiuhong, LIU Jinliang, LI Dongcheng, LIU Renxiang. Analysis of nicotine content and related gene expression in different types of tobacco germplasm [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1555-1563. |
[13] | XU Na, WANG Dahai, DU Chuanyin, DU Shasha, WANG Xiaomeng, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Yuqin, WU Yuanhua, GUAN Ensen, SHI Yi. Effects of planting space on growth and development of tobacco seedlings [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1342-1350. |
[14] | CHEN Qianli, WANG Hancheng, LIANG Yongjin, CAI Liuti, HUANG Yu, ZHOU Hao, LI Zhong, HAN Jie. Fungal composition and diversity analysis of healthy and rotten tobacco leaves after curing [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 1019-1028. |
[15] | ZHOU Li, NIE Changle, REN Yitong, LIANG Jingjing, XU Hua. Spatio-temporal changes and causes of winter and spring reference crop evapotranspiration in Sichuan [J]. , 2020, 32(4): 559-570. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||