Evaluation of Quzhou fresh soybean oligosaccharide germplasm resources based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240035

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 754-766.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240035

• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation of Quzhou fresh soybean oligosaccharide germplasm resources based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method

XU Zhuwei(), LEI Jun, SHAO Xiaowei, CHEN Runxing, JIANG Huan, WANG Shougen, YU Wenhui^*()

Quzhou Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Quzhou 324003, Zhejiang, China

Received:2024-01-03 Online:2025-04-25 Published:2025-05-09

Abstract

Abstract:

This study used 34 core fresh soybean germplasm samples from Quzhou as experimental materials to conduct descriptive statistical analysis of oligosaccharide content and construct frequency distribution maps. To screen excellent fresh soybean oligosaccharide varieties, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to construct an evaluation system for fresh soybean oligosaccharide germplasm resources from the selected indexes, combined with correlation analysis and stepwise regression analysis. The results showed that the coefficient of variation of sucrose, stachyose, raffinose, and oligosaccharides content was below 11.00%, with a small degree of dispersion. These four indicators followed a normal distribution, yet the distribution of sucrose content had a certain negative bias, and there were a small number of extreme values in oligosaccharide content. By AHP method, the 16 selected indexes were classfied into agronomic traits, yield traits and quality traits. Among them, the yield trats exhibited the highest weight of 0.443 4, and was followed by quality traits (0.387 4) and agronomic traits (0.169 2). Within the 16 selected indexes, the oligosaccharides content showed the highest weight of 0.171 8, which was followed by sucrose content, hundred-grain fresh weight, effecttive branching number and each pod grain number. Based on the the final score, the test materials were divided into four levels, with Level Ⅰ consisting of 0715F1, 0513I2, 0716F1, 1213B3, 1007C2, and Quxian No.1. Among them, 0715F1 had the highest agronomic traits score and yield traits score of 0.596 6 and 1.451 4, respectively, and 1007C2 had the highest quality traits score of 1.407 3. This study combined the analysis of soybean quality traits, agronomic traits and yield traits, providing a screening basis for obtaining new soybean varieties with optimized oligosaccharide quality structure through hybrid breeding.

Key words: fresh soybean, oligosaccharide, stepwise regression method, AHP, evaluation system

CLC Number:

S565.1

XU Zhuwei, LEI Jun, SHAO Xiaowei, CHEN Runxing, JIANG Huan, WANG Shougen, YU Wenhui. Evaluation of Quzhou fresh soybean oligosaccharide germplasm resources based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 754-766.

Figures/Tables 10

References 30

[1]	王玉军, 纪伟东, 李永平. 大豆低聚糖粉中棉子糖和水苏糖的测定方法研究[J]. 大豆科技, 2010(4): 23-25.
	WANG Y J, JI W D, LI Y P. Determination of raffinose and stachyose in soybean oligosaccharides[J]. Soybean Science & Technology, 2010(4): 23-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	杨秀芳, 陈梅, 马养民. 大豆低聚糖功能及其应用[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2010, 23(5): 8-11.
	YANG X F, CHEN M, MA Y M. Function and application of soybean oligosaccharides[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2010, 23(5): 8-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	黄美. 我国大豆地方品种群体籽粒可溶性糖含量的遗传变异和QTL关联定位研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012.
	HUANG M. Genetic variability and QTL association mapping of seed soluble sugar content in Chinese landrace population of soybean[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	刁小琴, 关海宁. 大豆低聚糖的开发及应用前景[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2008, 14(11): 16-18.
	DIAO X Q, GUAN H N. Development and application prospect of soybean oligosaccharides[J]. Food and Nutrition in China, 2008, 14(11): 16-18. (in Chinese)
[5]	姚怡莎, 谷旭, 商方方, 等. 大豆和膨化大豆主要抗营养因子分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(11): 2174-2182.
	YAO Y S, GU X, SHANG F F, et al. Investigation and analysis of main antinutritional factors in soybean and extruded soybean[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(11): 2174-2182. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	黄思满, 钟机, 陈丽娇. 大豆低聚糖的生理功能与研究进展[J]. 现代食品, 2016, 22(1): 110-111.
	HUANG S M, ZHONG J, CHEN L J. The physiological function and research progress of soybean oligosaccharides[J]. Modern Food, 2016, 22(1): 110-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	HARTWIG E E, KUO T M, KENTY M M. Seed protein and its relationship to soluble sugars in soybean[J]. Crop Science, 1997, 37(3): 770-773.
[8]	刘龙昌, 尚富德, 向其柏. 植物品种综合评价方法: 以桂花为例[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 33(1): 14-17.
	LIU L C, SHANG F D, XIANG Q B. Multifactoria appraisal methods on the plant cultivars: taking Osmanthus fragrans as an example[J]. Journal of Henan University(Natural Science), 2003, 33(1): 14-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	邱建国, 张汝学, 贾正平, 等. 地黄中寡糖含量的HPLC法测定[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2009, 15(8): 8-9.
	QIU J G, ZHANG R X, JIA Z P, et al. Determination of oligosaccharide content in Rehmannia glutinosa by HPLC[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, 2009, 15(8): 8-9. (in Chinese)
[10]	李亮亮, 李天来, 张恩平, 等. 四种酚酸物质在土壤中降解的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(6): 1460-1465.
	LI L L, LI T L, ZHANG E P, et al. Experimental study on degradation of four phenolic acids in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(6): 1460-1465. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	李灿东. 黑龙江省北部大豆主栽品种产量性状主成分分析[J]. 现代化农业, 2020(12): 4-8.
	LI C D. Principal component analysis of yield traits of soybean cultivars in northern Heilongjiang Province[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2020(12): 4-8. (in Chinese)
[12]	周晓莉, 许喜林. 大豆低聚糖的生理功能及应用[C]// “健康中国2030·健康食品的创新与发展” 暨2019年广东省食品学会学术年会论文集. 广州, 2019: 25-28.
[13]	HOU A, CHEN P, ALLOATTI J, et al. Genetic variability of seed sugar content in worldwide soybean germplasm collections[J]. Crop Science, 2009, 49(3): 903-912.
[14]	汪自强, 艾麦里, 苏贤坤. 鲜食大豆食味品质的评价指标研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2004, 19(3): 47-50.
	WANG Z Q, AI M L, SU X K. Studies on vegetable soybean quality assess factors[J]. Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2004, 19(3): 47-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	孙晓红, 王娅芳, 穆秋月, 等. 不同膳食模式及添加大豆低聚糖对肠道短链脂肪酸的影响[J]. 营养学报, 2007, 29(3): 268-270.
	SUN X H, WANG Y F, MU Q Y, et al. Effect of different dietary pattern and soybean oligsaccharides supplementation on short chain fatty acids in intestinal tract[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2007, 29(3): 268-270. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	张立峰, 刘庆富, 宁海凤. 大豆低聚糖对肠道菌群的调节作用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(4):357-359.
	ZHANG L F, LIU Q F, NING H F. Effect of soybean oligosaccharides on intestinal flora[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, 34(4):357-359. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	王建宇, 陈湘宁, 冯晓光, 等. 大豆低聚糖对小麦粉凝胶性质与体外消化率的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2020, 43(4): 91-96.
	WANG J Y, CHEN X N, FENG X G, et al. Effects of soybean oligosaccharides on physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of wheat flour[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2020, 43(4): 91-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	宋志峰, 金卫东, 王丽, 等. 吉林省部分大豆品种(系)低聚糖含量分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2009, 28(3): 516-519, 523.
	SONG Z F, JIN W D, WANG L, et al. Determination of oligosaccharides in some soybean varieties(lines)in Jilin Province[J]. Soybean Science, 2009, 28(3): 516-519, 523. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	邱红梅, 王曙明, 于妍, 等. 大豆低聚糖种质筛选及遗传研究进展[J]. 大豆科学, 2014, 33(5): 768-772.
	QIU H M, WANG S M, YU Y, et al. Research progresson germplasm screening and genetic with oligosaccharides of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2014, 33(5): 768-772. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	MATEI G, WOYANN L G, MENEGUZZI C, et al. Profiling and genotype×environment interactions of seed sugar contents in Brazilian soybean genotypes[J]. Euphytica, 2017, 213(9): 203.
[21]	HYMOWITZ T, COLLINS F I, PANCZNER J, et al. Relationship between the content of oil, protein, and sugar in soybean seed[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1972, 64(5): 613-616.
[22]	SARKIS J, SUNDARRAJ R P. Evaluating componentized enterprise information technologies: a multiattribute modeling approach[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2003, 5(3): 303-319.
[23]	ALBAYRAK E, ERENSAL Y C. Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: an application of multiple criteria decision making problem[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2004, 15(4): 491-503.
[24]	秦吉, 张翼鹏. 现代统计信息分析技术在安全工程方面的应用: 层次分析法原理[J]. 工业安全与防尘, 1999, 25(5): 44-48.
	QIN J, ZHANG Y P. Application of cortemporary statistical information analysis method in safety engincering: The priciple of AHP[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 1999, 25(5): 44-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	姜雪峰, 毛娟, 徐巨涛, 等. 苹果品质评价模型的建立与验证[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(3): 69-77.
	JIANG X F, MAO J, XU J T, et al. Establishment and verification of an evaluation model in apple quality[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2019, 54(3): 69-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	焦艺, 刘璇, 毕金峰, 等. 基于灰色关联度和层次分析法的油桃果汁品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报, 2014, 14(12): 154-163.
	JIAO Y, LIU X, BI J F, et al. Quality evaluation of nectarine juice based on grey interconnect degree analysis and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2014, 14(12): 154-163. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	李雪, 梁叶星, 许晶冰, 等. 重庆地区鲜食葡萄品质综合评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(11): 219-227.
	LI X, LIANG Y X, XU J B, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of table grapes in Chongqing[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019, 45(11): 219-227. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	林蝉蝉, 何舟阳, 单文龙, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析综合评价杨凌地区红色鲜食葡萄果实品质[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(4): 520-532.
	LIN C C, HE Z Y, SHAN W L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of 12 red table grape cultivars cultivated in Yangling area based on principal component and cluster analyses[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(4): 520-532. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	马林龙, 曹丹, 刘艳丽, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同茶树品种在湖北地区的适应性评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(7): 1335-1346.
	MA L L, CAO D, LIU Y L, et al. Evaluation of adaptability of different tea cultivars in Hubei based on principal components analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1335-1346. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	许乃银, 张国伟, 李健, 等. 基于GGE双标图和比强度选择的棉花品种生态区划分[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(11): 1500-1507.
	XU N Y, ZHANG G W, LI J, et al. Investigation of cotton mega-environment based on fiber strength selection and GGE biplot[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(11): 1500-1507. (in Chinese with English abstract)

编号 Code	品种名 Species name	类型 Type	编号 Code	品种名 Species name	类型 Type
A1	0505G3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A18	0906D2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A2	0513I2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A19	0906D3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A3	0713F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A20	0906E1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A4	0713F2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A21	0906E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A5	0715F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A22	0910F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A6	0715G1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A23	1007C2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A7	0715G2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A24	1009D	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A8	0716F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A25	1011C1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A9	0721E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A26	1102C4	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A10	0721F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A27	1213B3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A11	0724E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A28	X14C	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A12	0724F	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A29	衢0911-2 Qu 0911-2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A13	0811G2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A30	衢1102-2 Qu 1102-2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A14	0 817	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A31	衢鲜1号Quxian No. 1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A15	0818E1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A32	衢鲜6号Quxian No. 6	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A16	0818E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A33	衢鲜8号Quxian No. 8	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A17	0818E3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A34	衢鲜9号Quxian No. 9	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean

编号 Code	品种名 Species name	类型 Type	编号 Code	品种名 Species name	类型 Type
A1	0505G3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A18	0906D2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A2	0513I2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A19	0906D3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A3	0713F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A20	0906E1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A4	0713F2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A21	0906E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A5	0715F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A22	0910F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A6	0715G1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A23	1007C2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A7	0715G2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A24	1009D	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A8	0716F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A25	1011C1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A9	0721E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A26	1102C4	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A10	0721F1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A27	1213B3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A11	0724E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A28	X14C	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A12	0724F	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A29	衢0911-2 Qu 0911-2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A13	0811G2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A30	衢1102-2 Qu 1102-2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A14	0 817	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A31	衢鲜1号Quxian No. 1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A15	0818E1	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A32	衢鲜6号Quxian No. 6	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A16	0818E2	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A33	衢鲜8号Quxian No. 8	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean
A17	0818E3	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean	A34	衢鲜9号Quxian No. 9	秋季鲜食大豆Autumn fresh soybean

项目 Item	蔗糖含量 Sucrose conten	棉子糖含量 Raffinose content	水苏糖含量 Stachyose content	低聚糖含量 Oligosaccharides content
平均值Mean	47.00	9.87	38.63	95.50
中位数Median	46.59	9.80	38.72	95.72
标准差Standard deviation	2.80	1.04	1.96	4.46
最小值Minimum	41.50	8.09	35.15	88.51
最大值Maximum	54.06	1.30	4.42	104.14
偏度Skewness	0.41	0.29	0.10	0.15
峰度Kurtosis	-0.10	-0.22	-0.11	-0.88
变异系数Coefficient of variation/%	5.95	10.56	5.06	4.67

项目 Item	蔗糖含量 Sucrose conten	棉子糖含量 Raffinose content	水苏糖含量 Stachyose content	低聚糖含量 Oligosaccharides content
平均值Mean	47.00	9.87	38.63	95.50
中位数Median	46.59	9.80	38.72	95.72
标准差Standard deviation	2.80	1.04	1.96	4.46
最小值Minimum	41.50	8.09	35.15	88.51
最大值Maximum	54.06	1.30	4.42	104.14
偏度Skewness	0.41	0.29	0.10	0.15
峰度Kurtosis	-0.10	-0.22	-0.11	-0.88
变异系数Coefficient of variation/%	5.95	10.56	5.06	4.67

指标Index	PH	BPH	MSPN	EBN	EPN	EPGN	HFW	PFW	SGP	MGP	PL	PW	Su	Ra	St
BPH	0.551^**	1.000
MSPN	0.511^*	0.427^*	1.000
EBN	-0.553^**	-0.422^*	0.089	1.000
EPN	0.089	0.028	0.460^*	0.515^**	1.000
EPGN	-0.315	-0.249	-0.193	0.158	0.007	1.000
HFW	0.184	-0.078	-0.089	-0.045	-0.381	-0.080	1.000
PFW	-0.384	-0.276	-0.132	0.198	-0.127	0.584^**	0.427^*	1.000
SGP	0.112	0.181	0.213	0.158	0.699^**	-0.177	-0.436^*	-0.369	1.000
MGP	0.076	-0.016	0.479^*	0.562^**	0.979^**	0.056	-0.320	-0.044	0.541^**	1.000
PL	0.150	-0.097	-0.247	0.081	-0.027	-0.055	0.542^**	0.113	-0.198	0.032	1.000
PW	-0.107	-0.104	-0.263	-0.208	-0.354	0.040	0.244	0.210	-0.438^*	-0.296	0.249	1.000
Su	-0.063	0.161	0.182	0.008	0.106	-0.016	-0.379	-0.321	0.080	0.098	-0.030	0.070	1.000
Ra	0.258	0.228	0.239	-0.030	0.288	-0.228	-0.069	-0.195	0.013	0.339	0.164	-0.116	0.407^*	1.000
St	0.295	0.043	-0.074	-0.174	0.245	-0.016	-0.022	-0.289	0.227	0.227	0.301	-0.146	0.270	0.466^*	1.000
Ol	0.142	0.170	0.134	-0.078	0.237	-0.063	-0.271	-0.373	0.155	0.235	0.145	-0.041	0.849^**	0.677^**	0.708^**

Evaluation of Quzhou fresh soybean oligosaccharide germplasm resources based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 30

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

y	x	偏回归方程 Partial regression equation	标准化系数 Normalization coefficient	决定系数 R²	显著水平 Significant level
株高 Plant height	x₁有效分枝数Effective branching number,x₂主茎节数Main stalk pitch number,x₃荚长Pod length	y=-67.277-7.85x₁+6.043x₂+10.129x₃	-0.642,0.658, 0.365	0.708	0.005
底荚高度 Bottom pod height	株高 Plant height	y=3.922+0.111x	0.551	0.272	0.005
主茎节数 Main stalk pitch number	x₁株高Plant height,x₂有效分枝数Effective branching number,x₃荚长Pod length	y=13.817+0.101x₁+0.852x₂-1.327x₃	0.931,0.640, -0.439	0.587	0.005
有效分枝数 Effective branching number	x₁多粒荚数Multiple grain pod number,x₂株高Plant height,x₃百粒鲜重Hundred-grain fresh weight	y=1.507+0.076x₁-0.054x₂+0.023x₃	0.710,-0.663, 0.304	0.715	0.020
有效荚数 Effective pod number	x₁多粒荚数Multiple grain pod number,x₂单粒荚数Single grain pod number,x₃荚长Pod length	y=1.085+1.000x₁+0.994x₂-0.173x₃	0.851,0.238, -0.007	1.000	0.017
每荚粒数 Each pod grain number	x₁百荚鲜重Hundred-pod fresh weight,x₂百粒鲜重Hundred-grain fresh weight	y=1.786+0.003x₁-0.009x₂	0.756,-0.402	0.423	0.032
百粒鲜重 Hundred-grain fresh weight	x₁荚长Pod length,x₂百荚鲜重Hundred-pod fresh weight,x₃每荚粒数Each pod grain number	y=0.670+13.354x₁+0.110x₂-18.667x₃	0.449,0.620, -0.417	0.472	0.039
百荚鲜重 Hundred-pod fresh weight	x₁每荚粒数Each pod grain number,x₂百粒鲜重Hundred-grain fresh weight,x₃株高Plant height	y=-71.207+132.369x₁+2.958x₂-1.893x₃	0.527,0.527, -0.315	0.601	0.037
单粒荚数 Single grain pod number	x₁有效荚数Effective pod number,x₂多粒荚数Multiple grain pod number,x₃荚长Pod length	y=-1.059+1.002x₁-1.002x₂+0.168x₃	4.189,-3.563, 0.028	0.997	0.021
多粒荚数 Multiple grain pod number	x₁有效荚数Effective pod number,x₂单粒荚数Single grain pod number,x₃荚长Pod length	y=-1.085+1.000x₁-0.994x₂+0.173x₃	1.175,-0.279, 0.008	1.000	0.016
荚长Pod length	百粒鲜重Hundred-grain fresh weight	y=4.555+0.018x	0.542	0.261	0.006
荚宽Pod width	单粒荚数Single grain pod number	y=1.539-0.02x	-0.438	0.155	0.032
蔗糖含量 Sucrose content	x₁低聚糖含量Oligosaccharides content,x₂水苏糖含量Stachyose content,x₃棉子糖含量Raffinose content	y=0.226+1.000x₁-1.006x₂-1.0001x₃	1.548,-0.673, -0.327	1.000	0.000
棉子糖含量 Raffinose content	x₁低聚糖含量Oligosaccharides content,x₂蔗糖含量Sucrose content,x₃水苏糖含量Stachyose content	y=0.210+0.995x₁-0.994x₂-1.000x₃	4.718,-3.047, -2.052	0.997	<0.001
水苏糖含量 Stachyose content	x₁低聚糖含量Oligosaccharides content,x₂蔗糖含量Sucrose content,x₃棉子糖含量Raffinose content	y=0.235+0.994x₁-0.993x₂-0.995x₃	2.297,-1.484, -0.485	0.999	<0.001
低聚糖含量 Oligosaccharides content	x₁蔗糖含量Sucrose content,x₂水苏糖含量Stachyose content,x₃棉子糖含量Raffinose content	y=-0.217+0.999x₁+1.005_x2+1.002x₃	0.646,0.435, 0.211	1.000	<0.001

目标层 Objects (A)	准则层 Rules (B)	指标层 Index (C)	方案层 Schemes (D)
优异鲜食大豆低聚糖品种评价	农艺性状	株高Plant height (C1)	优异鲜食大豆低聚糖品种综合评价
Evaluation of excellent fresh soybean	Agronomic	底荚高度Bottom pod height (C2)	得分
oligosaccharides varieties (A)	traits (B1)	主茎节数Main stalk pitch number (C3)	Comprehensive evaluation score of
		有效分枝数Effective branching number (C4)	excellent fresh soybean oligosaccharides
	产量性状	有效荚数Effective pod number (C5)	varieties(d1,d2,d3,d4,…,d24)
	Yield	每荚粒数Each pod grain number (C6)
	traits (B2)	百粒鲜重Hundred-grain fresh weight (C7)
		百荚鲜重Hundred-pod fresh weight (C8)
		单粒荚数Single grain pod number (C9)
		多粒荚数Multiple grain pod number (C10)
		荚长Pod length (C11)
		荚宽Pod width (C12)
	品质性状	蔗糖含量Sucrose content (C13)
	Quality	棉子糖含量Raffinose content (C14)
	traits (B3)	水苏糖含量Stachyose content (C15)
		低聚糖含量Oligosaccharides content (C16)

评价指标 Index	不同分值所对应的各指标取值Values for different indexes under the given score
评价指标 Index	1	2	3	4
BPH/cm	>12.7	11.0~12.7	9.2~10.9	<9.2
MSPN	<13.6	13.6~14.5	14.6~15.5	>15.5
EBN	<1.6	1.6~2.3	2.4~3.1	>3.1
EPN	<29.2	29.2~36.7	36.8~44.3	>44.3
EPGN	<1.9	1.9~2.1	2.2~2.4	>2.4
HFW/g	<71.9	71.9~79.5	79.6~87.0	>87.0
PFW/g	<252.5	252.5~319.7	319.8~387.0	>387.0
MGP	<26.4	26.4~32.9	33.0~39.5	>39.5
PL/cm	<5.7	5.7~5.9	6.0~6.2	>6.2
Su/(mg·g^-1)	<44.80	44.8~48.0	48.1~51.4	>51.4
Ra/(mg·g^-1)	>11.25	10.20~11.25	9.14~10.19	<9.14
St/(mg·g^-1)	>41.35	39.29~41.35	37.22~39.28	<37.22
Ol/(mg·g^-1)	<92.42	92.42~96.32	96.33~100.23	>100.23

模型层次 Hierarchies		判断矩阵 Judgment matrix									一致性检验 Consistency check
A~B	A	B1	B2	B3						W	λ_max=3.018
	B1	1	1/3	1/2						0.169 2	CR=0.017 6
	B2	3	1	1						0.443 4
	B3	2	1	1						0.387 4
B1~C	B1	C1	C2	C3	C4					W	λ_max=4.010 4
	C1	1	1	1/2	1/3					0.140 9	CR=0.003 9
	C2	1	1	1/2	1/3					0.140 9
	C3	2	2	1	1/2					0.262 8
	C4	3	3	2	1					0.455 4
B2~C	B2	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10	C11	C12	W	λ_max=8.347 1
	C5	1	1	1	2	3	1	1	3	0.163 0	CR=0.035 2
	C6	1	1	1/2	2	2	2	2	3	0.166 2
	C7	1	2	1	2	3	2	3	4	0.226 0
	C8	1/2	1/2	1/2	1	3	2	2	3	0.136 8
	C9	1/3	1/2	1/3	1/3	1	1/2	1/2	1	0.056 1
	C10	1	1/2	1/2	1/2	2	1	1/2	1	0.088 4
	C11	1	1/2	1/3	1/2	2	2	1	2	0.107 6
	C12	1/3	1/3	1/4	1/3	1	1	1/2	1	0.055 8
B3~C	B3	C13	C14	C15	C16					W	λ_max=4.060 6
	C13	1	3	3	1/2					0.312 1	CR=0.022 7
	C14	1/3	1	1	1/3					0.122 2
	C15	1/3	1	1	1/3					0.122 2
	C16	2	3	3	1					0.443 5

指标 Index	因子 Factor	W(A-B_i)	W(B-C_i)	综合权重 Comprehensive weight	排名 Order
C1	PH	0.169 2	0.140 9	0.023 8	15
C2	BPH		0.140 9	0.023 8	15
C3	MSPN		0.262 8	0.044 5	11
C4	EBN		0.455 4	0.077 1	4
C5	EPN	0.443 4	0.163 0	0.072 3	6
C6	EPGN		0.166 2	0.073 7	5
C7	HFW		0.226 0	0.100 2	3
C8	PFW		0.136 8	0.060 7	7
C9	SGP		0.056 1	0.024 9	13
C10	MGP		0.088 4	0.039 2	12
C11	PL		0.107 6	0.047 7	8
C12	PW		0.055 8	0.024 8	14
C13	Su	0.387 4	0.312 1	0.120 9	2
C14	Ra		0.122 2	0.047 3	9
C15	St		0.122 2	0.047 3	9
C16	Ol		0.443 5	0.171 8	1

编号 No.	品种 Cultivars	品质性状 Quality traits	农艺性状 Agronomic traits	产量性状 Yield traits	总得分 Total score	排名 Ranking	分级 Grade
A5	0715F1	0.821 9	0.596 6	1.4514	2.869 9	1	Ⅰ
A2	0513I2	1.161 9	0.596 6	0.947 8	2.706 3	2	Ⅰ
A8	0716F1	1.191 8	0.451 2	1.045 1	2.688 1	3	Ⅰ
A27	1213B3	1.191 8	0.350 3	1.143 4	2.685 5	4	Ⅰ
A23	1007C2	1.407 3	0.353 4	0.907 1	2.667 8	5	Ⅰ
A31	衢鲜1号Quxian No. 1	1.360 0	0.427 4	0.752 7	2.540 1	6	Ⅰ
A32	衢鲜6号Quxian No. 6	1.114 6	0.430 5	0.959 6	2.504 7	7	Ⅱ
A30	衢1102-2 Qu 1102-2	0.869 2	0.406 7	1.181 5	2.457 4	8	Ⅱ
A24	1009D	0.792 0	0.483 8	1.180 9	2.456 7	9	Ⅱ
A28	X14C	0.946 4	0.471 9	1.036 9	2.455 2	10	Ⅱ
A7	0715G2	1.239 1	0.338 4	0.850 9	2.428 4	11	Ⅱ
A9	0721E2	1.209 2	0.374 1	0.798 5	2.381 8	12	Ⅱ
A29	衢0911-2 Qu 0911-2	0.748 3	0.475 0	1.133 8	2.357 1	13	Ⅲ
A18	0906D2	0.916 5	0.374 1	1.056 7	2.347 3	14	Ⅲ
A34	衢鲜9号Quxian No. 9	0.869 2	0.350 3	1.109 2	2.328 7	15	Ⅲ
A1	0505G3	0.946 4	0.430 5	0.921 8	2.298 7	16	Ⅲ
A16	0818E2	0.821 9	0.228 7	1.182 9	2.233 5	17	Ⅲ
A26	1102C4	0.899 1	0.329 6	0.972 6	2.201 3	18	Ⅲ
A33	衢鲜8号Quxian No. 8	0.869 2	0.282 0	1.031 9	2.183 1	19	Ⅳ
A22	0910F1	0.671 1	0.353 4	1.109 2	2.133 7	20	Ⅳ
A20	0906E1	0.623 8	0.451 2	0.999 1	2.074 1	21	Ⅳ
A25	1011C1	0.576 5	0.353 4	0.946 1	1.876 0	22	Ⅳ
A11	0724E2	0.744 7	0.350 3	0.724 8	1.819 8	23	Ⅳ
A19	0906D3	0.529 2	0.427 4	0.801 8	1.758 4	24	Ⅳ

[1]	SHAO Yingying, ZHANG Jianguo. Construction of evalution system for rural ecological health-care space and emperical study: in case of “Dragon Gate Wonderlands” village scenic spot [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1473-1484.
[2]	DONG Yanmin, YAN Fengxian. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination of agricultural high-quality development in China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 170-182.
[3]	WEN Jifeng, SHEN Huanhuan, YIN Wenqi, GONG Yongping, YI Keke, DENG Ying, YAN Qigui. Research on immunological effect of chitosan oligosaccharide on subunit vaccine of giant panda rotavirus VP6-VP7 protein [J]. , 2019, 31(12): 2005-2010.
[4]	ZHANG Cuiying, YOU Zhaotong, WANG Guoping. Research on selection criteria of agri-products supply chain partner [J]. , 2017, 29(6): 1043-1049.
[5]	ZHU Ying, LIN Jingya, ZHAO Yue, FENG Yuqing, ZHANG Minglian. Study on effectiveness evaluation of ecological restoration of Taihu National Wetland Park [J]. , 2017, 29(12): 2109-2119.
[6]	ZHANG Tie\\|jian1，2， ZHANG Xiao\\|yan1，2， LI Wei1， LIU Jun\\|liang1，2. Rural sewage treatment technology decisions of Hebei Plain areas based on AHP [J]. , 2015, 27(6): 1037-.
[7]	YANG Fan1， SHI Zheng\\|tao1， ZENG Jian\\|jun2， XIAO Meng\\|jing1， SU Wang\\|de1，LIU Gang1. Comprehensive agricultural production capacity evaluation on Nanting river basin [J]. , 2015, 27(5): 872-.
[8]	LIU Hang1， FENG Li\\|qiang2， LIU Xing\\|jiang3. Effects of oligosaccharides on abscisic acid synthesis in wheat [J]. , 2015, 27(1): 12-.
[9]	NING Hui-juan;SHAO Feng*;SUN Xi-xi;SHAN Jia-yue. AHP-based evaluation on plant landscape of Huagangguanyu Park in Hangzhou [J]. , 2011, 23(4): 0-724.