Effect of policy incentives on farmer's adoption behavior of conservation tillage technologies: based on the perspectives of factor quality and time preference

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240385

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1172-1181.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240385

• Agricultural Economy and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of policy incentives on farmer's adoption behavior of conservation tillage technologies: based on the perspectives of factor quality and time preference

ZHU Zheyi¹^,²(), SHI Fang¹, NING Ke¹^,², ZHENG Shan³^,^*()

1. School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2. Zhejiang Rural Revitalization Research Institute, Hangzhou 311300, China
3. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received:2024-04-27 Online:2025-05-25 Published:2025-06-11

Abstract

Abstract:

Adoption of conservation tillage technologies is recognized as important measure to improve soil quality, while the diffusion rate is different among technologies. In this study, the economic and environmental benefits of conservation tillage technologies were systematically examined. From the perspectives of factor quality and time preference, the mechanism of how policy subsidies influence farmer's adoption behavior of conservation tillage technologies was identified, and an empirical analysis was carried out with plots data obtained from the survey in four provinces of Heilongjiang, Henan, Sichuan and Zhejiang, China. It was shown that the yield and soil nitrogen content could be improved by the adoption of conservation tillage technologies. Policy incentives could increase the possibility of farmer's adoption behavior toward conservation tillage technology. The better soil quality and the weaker time preference would diminish the effect of policy subsidies. In order to improve the soil quality and ensure food security, it was suggested that the government should improve public policies based on the characteristics of soils and farmers to promote the diffusion of conservation tillage technologies.

Key words: conservation tillage, policy subsidies, soil quality, time preference

CLC Number:

F323.3

ZHU Zheyi, SHI Fang, NING Ke, ZHENG Shan. Effect of policy incentives on farmer's adoption behavior of conservation tillage technologies: based on the perspectives of factor quality and time preference[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1172-1181.

Figures/Tables 7

References 28

[1]	高旺盛. 论保护性耕作技术的基本原理与发展趋势[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(12): 2702-2708.
	GAO W S. Development trends and basic principles of conservation tillage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(12): 2702-2708. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	翟振, 李玉义, 逄焕成, 等. 黄淮海北部农田犁底层现状及其特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(12): 2322-2332.
	ZHAI Z, LI Y Y, PANG H C, et al. Study on present situation and characteristics of plow pan in the northern region of Huang Huai Hai Plain[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(12): 2322-2332. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	VIGNOLA R, KOELLNER T, SCHOLZ R W, et al. Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(4): 1132-1142.
[4]	薛彩霞, 李园园, 胡超, 等. 中国保护性耕作净碳汇的时空格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(5): 1164-1182.
	XUE C X, LI Y Y, HU C, et al. Study on spatio-temporal pattern of conservation tillage on net carbon sink in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(5): 1164-1182. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	HOBBS P R, GUPTA R. Problems and challenges of no-till farming for the rice-wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains in south Asia[M]// LALR, HOBBSP R, UPHOFFN. Sustainable agriculture and the international rice-wheat system. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2004
[6]	唐利群, 周洁红, 于晓华. 采用保护性耕作对减少水稻产量损失的实证分析: 基于4省1 080个稻农的调研数据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 1016-1028.
	TANG L Q, ZHOU J H, YU X H. The impact of conservation tillage on reduction in rice yield loss: evidence from 1 080 Chinese rice farmers[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(6): 1016-1028. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	王金霞, 张丽娟. 保护性耕作技术对农业生产的影响: 黄河流域的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2010, 22(6): 77-84.
	WANG J X, ZHANG L J. Impacts of conservation tillage on agriculture: empirical research in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Management Review, 2010, 22(6): 77-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	NAUDIN K, GOZÉ E, BALARABE O, et al. Impact of no tillage and mulching practices on cotton production in North Cameroon: a multi-locational on-farm assessment[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2010, 108(1/2): 68-76.
[9]	谢婉菲, 尹奇, 鲍海君. 基于农户行为的彭州市耕地保护现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2012, 33(1): 67-72.
	XIE W F, YIN Q, BAO H J. Analysis of status and influence factors of cultivated land protection based on peasant households' behavior in Pengzhou City[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2012, 33(1): 67-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	李文欢, 王桂霞. 社会资本、技术认知对黑土区农户保护性耕作技术采纳行为的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(10): 1675-1686.
	LI W H, WANG G X. Effects of social capital and technology cognition on farmers' adoption of conservation tillage in black soil areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(10): 1675-1686. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	刘洪彬, 吴梦瑶, 马贤磊, 等. 基于分布式认知理论的农户保护性耕作技术采纳行为及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(10): 75-84.
	LIU H B, WU M Y, MA X L, et al. Research on influencing factors of farmers' adoption behavior of conservation tillage technology based on distributed cognition theory[J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(10): 75-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	钱龙, 冯永辉, 钱文荣. 农地确权、调整经历与农户耕地质量保护行为: 来自广西的经验证据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(1): 61-76.
	QIAN L, FENG Y H, QIAN W R. Farmland certification, adjustment experience and farmer's land quality protection behavior: empirical evidence from Guangxi[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(1): 61-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	李卫, 薛彩霞, 姚顺波, 等. 农户保护性耕作技术采用行为及其影响因素: 基于黄土高原476户农户的分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(1): 44-57.
	LI W, XUE C X, YAO S B, et al. The adoption behavior of households' conservation tillage technology: an empirical analysis based on data collected from 476 households on the Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017(1): 44-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	LI H W, HE J, BHARUCHA Z P, et al. Improving China's food and environmental security with conservation agriculture[J]. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2016, 14(4): 377-391.
[15]	KASSIE M, MARENYA P, TESSEMA Y, et al. Measuring farm and market level economic impacts of improved maize production technologies in Ethiopia: evidence from panel data[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2018, 69(1): 76-95.
[16]	FİTRİATİN B N, AMANDA A P, KAMALUDDİN N N, et al. Some soil biological and chemical properties as affected by biofertilizers and organic ameliorants application on paddy rice[J]. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 2021,10(2):105-110.
[17]	黄景, 顾明华, 徐世宏, 等. 稻草还田免耕抛秧对土壤剖面氮、磷、钾含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(13): 2648-2657.
	HUANG J, GU M H, XU S H, et al. Effects of no-tillage and rice-seedling casting with rice straw returning on content of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of soil profiles[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(13): 2648-2657. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	蔡荣, 蔡书凯. 保护性耕作技术采用及对作物单产影响的实证分析: 基于安徽省水稻种植户的调查数据[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(9): 1705-1711.
	CAI R, CAI S K. The adoption of conservation agricultural technology and the impact on crop yields based on rice farms in Anhui Province[J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(9): 1705-1711. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	张霞, 杜昊辉, 王旭东, 等. 不同耕作措施对渭北旱塬土壤碳库管理指数及其构成的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2223-2237.
	ZHANG X, DU H H, WANG X D, et al. Effects of different tillage methods on soil organic carbon pool management index and its composition in Weibei highland[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(12): 2223-2237. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	赵政鑫, 王晓云, 李府阳, 等. 秸秆还田配施稳定性氮肥对麦玉轮作水氮利用的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2023, 54(6): 350-360.
	ZHAO Z X, WANG X Y, LI F Y, et al. Effects of straw returning and application of stable nitrogen fertilizer on water and nitrogen use efficiencies of wheat maize rotation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2023, 54(6): 350-360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	郭芬, 金建君, 张晨阳, 等. 农户保护性耕作技术采纳行为及其影响因素研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(11): 2165-2177.
	GUO F, JIN J J, ZHANG C Y, et al. A review of farmers' conservation tillage technology adoption behavior and influencing factors[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(11): 2165-2177. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	李然嫣, 陈印军. 东北典型黑土区农户耕地保护利用行为研究: 基于黑龙江省绥化市农户调查的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(11): 80-91.
	LI R Y, CHEN Y J. A study on farmer's protection and utilization of farmland in typical black soil areas of northeast China: an empirical analysis based on a survey of farmers in Suihua City, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017(11): 80-91. (in Chinese)
[23]	陈菁, 陈迪, 刘顺国. 保护性耕作对土壤质量的影响及其综合效益[J]. 农业经济, 2022(12): 12-14.
	CHEN J, CHEN D, LIU S G. Effects of conservation tillage on soil quality and its comprehensive benefits[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2022(12): 12-14. (in Chinese)
[24]	TRAN D Q, KURKALOVA L A. Persistence in tillage decisions: aggregate data analysis[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2019, 7(2): 109-118.
[25]	徐志刚, 张骏逸, 吕开宇. 经营规模、地权期限与跨期农业技术采用: 以秸秆直接还田为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(3): 61-74.
	XU Z G, ZHANG J Y, LV K Y. The scale of operation, term of land ownership and the adoption of inter-temporal agricultural technology: an example of “straw return to soil directly”[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(3): 61-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	刘乐, 张娇, 张崇尚, 等. 经营规模的扩大有助于农户采取环境友好型生产行为吗: 以秸秆还田为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(5): 17-26.
	LIU L, ZHANG J, ZHANG C S, et al. Does the expansion of business scale help farmers adopt environmentally friendly production behaviors: taking straw returning to the field as an example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017(5): 17-26. (in Chinese)
[27]	薛建福, 赵鑫, DIKGWATLHE S, 等. 保护性耕作对农田碳、氮效应的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(19): 6006-6013.
	XUE J F, ZHAO X, DIKGWATLHE S, et al. Advances in effects of conservation tillage on soil organic carbon and nitrogen[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(19): 6006-6013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	王淑兰, 王浩, 李娟, 等. 不同耕作方式下长期秸秆还田对旱作春玉米田土壤碳、氮、水含量及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1530-1540.
	WANG S L, WANG H, LI J, et al. Effects of long-term straw mulching on soil organic carbon, nitrogen and moisture and spring maize yield on rain-fed croplands under different patterns of soil tillage practice[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(5): 1530-1540. (in Chinese with English abstract)

变量 Variable	符号 Symbol	定义与说明 Definition and explanation	样本量 Sample size	平均值 Mean	标准差 Standard deviation
单产Yield/(kg·hm^-2)	E₁	单位面积耕地的作物产量Yield per capita arable land	1 475	837.25	217.71
N含量 N content/(g·kg^-1)	E₂	土壤全氮含量的自然对数值Natural logarithm value of total nitrogen content of soil	732	0.92	0.24
P含量P content/(mg·kg^-1)	E₃	土壤速效磷含量的自然对数值Natural logarithm value of available phosphorus content of soil	732	3.11	0.96
K含量K content/(mg·kg^-1)	E₄	土壤速效钾含量的自然对数值Natural logarithm value of available potassium content of soil	732	5.02	0.62
保护性耕作技术采纳情况 Adoption of conservation tillage	B₁	采纳,1;不采纳,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.64	0.48
深松技术采纳情况Adoption of subsoiling	B₂	采纳,1;不采纳,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.09	0.28
秸秆还田技术采纳情况 Adoption of straw returning	B₃	采纳,1;不采纳,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.63	0.48
保护性耕作技术补贴情况 Subsidy for conservation tillage	P₁	有补贴,1;没有补贴,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.22	0.41
深松补贴情况Subsidies for subsoiling	P₂	有补贴,1;没有补贴,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.04	0.21
秸秆还田补贴情况 Subsidy for straw returning	P₃	有补贴,1;没有补贴,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.19	0.39
土壤质量Soil quality	M₁	差,1;好,0 Bad, 1; Good, 0	1 475	0.07	0.26
时间偏好 Time preference	M₂	规模户,1;小农户,0 Scale household, 1; Small household, 0	1 475	0.56	0.50
性别Gender	X₁	女,0;男,1 Female, 0; Male, 1	1 475	0.97	0.18
年龄Age	X₂	受访者的实际年龄Age of the interviewee	1 475	56.01	10.86
健康情况Health	X₃	好,0;差,1 Good, 0; Bad, 1	1 475	0.03	0.17
受教育年限Years of education/a	X₄	受访者的受教育年限Years of education of the interviewee	1 475	6.81	3.12
风险偏好 Risk preference	X₅	0~1取值,数值越高,越偏好风险 The value range is 0 to 1. The higher the value, the more inclined the risk is	1 475	0.38	0.41
家庭人口数量 Household population	X₆	受访者家庭的人口数 Number of family members of the interviewee	1 475	4.16	1.75
农业经验 Agricultural experience/a	X₇	受访者从事农业生产的年限 Years of working in agricultural production of the interviewee	1 475	32.37	13.88
参加农技培训次数 Participation in agricultural technology training	X₈	受访者参加农技培训的次数 Participation times in agricultural technology training	1 475	2.20	3.63
地块面积 Land area/hm²	X₉	受访者家庭的耕地面积 Cultivated area of the interviewed family	1 475	0.89	2.43
离家距离 Distance between the plot and house/km	X₁₀	地块离家的距离 Distance between the plot and home	1 475	0.85	1.46
化肥使用量 Fertilizer application rate/(kg·hm^-2)	X₁₁	受访者的化肥施用量(折纯) Application rate (for pure) of fertilizers of the interviewee	1 475	252.94	162.23
作物类型Crop type	X₁₂	水稻,1;玉米,0 Rice, 1; corn,0	1 475	0.49	0.50
村人均纯收入 Per capita net income of the village/yuan	X₁₃	受访者所在村人均纯收入的自然对数值 Natural logarithm value of per capita net income of the village of the interviewee	1 475	9.07	0.64
到乡镇的距离 Distance to township/km	X₁₄	所在村到其所属乡镇的距离 Distance from the village to its township	1 475	2.47	2.36

变量 Variable	符号 Symbol	定义与说明 Definition and explanation	样本量 Sample size	平均值 Mean	标准差 Standard deviation
单产Yield/(kg·hm^-2)	E₁	单位面积耕地的作物产量Yield per capita arable land	1 475	837.25	217.71
N含量 N content/(g·kg^-1)	E₂	土壤全氮含量的自然对数值Natural logarithm value of total nitrogen content of soil	732	0.92	0.24
P含量P content/(mg·kg^-1)	E₃	土壤速效磷含量的自然对数值Natural logarithm value of available phosphorus content of soil	732	3.11	0.96
K含量K content/(mg·kg^-1)	E₄	土壤速效钾含量的自然对数值Natural logarithm value of available potassium content of soil	732	5.02	0.62
保护性耕作技术采纳情况 Adoption of conservation tillage	B₁	采纳,1;不采纳,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.64	0.48
深松技术采纳情况Adoption of subsoiling	B₂	采纳,1;不采纳,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.09	0.28
秸秆还田技术采纳情况 Adoption of straw returning	B₃	采纳,1;不采纳,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.63	0.48
保护性耕作技术补贴情况 Subsidy for conservation tillage	P₁	有补贴,1;没有补贴,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.22	0.41
深松补贴情况Subsidies for subsoiling	P₂	有补贴,1;没有补贴,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.04	0.21
秸秆还田补贴情况 Subsidy for straw returning	P₃	有补贴,1;没有补贴,0 Yes, 1; No, 0	1 475	0.19	0.39
土壤质量Soil quality	M₁	差,1;好,0 Bad, 1; Good, 0	1 475	0.07	0.26
时间偏好 Time preference	M₂	规模户,1;小农户,0 Scale household, 1; Small household, 0	1 475	0.56	0.50
性别Gender	X₁	女,0;男,1 Female, 0; Male, 1	1 475	0.97	0.18
年龄Age	X₂	受访者的实际年龄Age of the interviewee	1 475	56.01	10.86
健康情况Health	X₃	好,0;差,1 Good, 0; Bad, 1	1 475	0.03	0.17
受教育年限Years of education/a	X₄	受访者的受教育年限Years of education of the interviewee	1 475	6.81	3.12
风险偏好 Risk preference	X₅	0~1取值,数值越高,越偏好风险 The value range is 0 to 1. The higher the value, the more inclined the risk is	1 475	0.38	0.41
家庭人口数量 Household population	X₆	受访者家庭的人口数 Number of family members of the interviewee	1 475	4.16	1.75
农业经验 Agricultural experience/a	X₇	受访者从事农业生产的年限 Years of working in agricultural production of the interviewee	1 475	32.37	13.88
参加农技培训次数 Participation in agricultural technology training	X₈	受访者参加农技培训的次数 Participation times in agricultural technology training	1 475	2.20	3.63
地块面积 Land area/hm²	X₉	受访者家庭的耕地面积 Cultivated area of the interviewed family	1 475	0.89	2.43
离家距离 Distance between the plot and house/km	X₁₀	地块离家的距离 Distance between the plot and home	1 475	0.85	1.46
化肥使用量 Fertilizer application rate/(kg·hm^-2)	X₁₁	受访者的化肥施用量(折纯) Application rate (for pure) of fertilizers of the interviewee	1 475	252.94	162.23
作物类型Crop type	X₁₂	水稻,1;玉米,0 Rice, 1; corn,0	1 475	0.49	0.50
村人均纯收入 Per capita net income of the village/yuan	X₁₃	受访者所在村人均纯收入的自然对数值 Natural logarithm value of per capita net income of the village of the interviewee	1 475	9.07	0.64
到乡镇的距离 Distance to township/km	X₁₄	所在村到其所属乡镇的距离 Distance from the village to its township	1 475	2.47	2.36

技术 Technology	采纳情况 Adoption status	单产 Yield/(kg·hm^-2)	N含量 Nitrogen content/ (g·kg^-1)	P含量 P content/ (mg·kg^-1)	K含量 K content/ (mg·kg^-1)
保护性耕作技术	不采纳Not adopted	6 387.77±69.69	0.94±0.02	3.28±0.06	5.13±0.04
Conservation tillage	采纳Adopted	6 219.10±53.54^*	0.92±0.01	3.03±0.04^***	4.97±0.03^***
深松技术	不采纳Not adopted	6 305.77±44.37	0.93±0.01	3.09±0.04	4.98±0.02
Subsoiling	采纳Adopted	5 999.05±146.54^**	0.85±0.02^***	3.29±0.11^*	5.34±0.06^***
秸秆还田技术	不采纳Not adopted	6 389.80±69.67	0.93±0.02	3.29±0.06	5.13±0.04
Straw returning	采纳Adopted	6 214.27±53.58^**	0.92±0.01	3.02±0.04^***	4.97±0.03^***

技术 Technology	采纳情况 Adoption status	单产 Yield/(kg·hm^-2)	N含量 Nitrogen content/ (g·kg^-1)	P含量 P content/ (mg·kg^-1)	K含量 K content/ (mg·kg^-1)
保护性耕作技术	不采纳Not adopted	6 387.77±69.69	0.94±0.02	3.28±0.06	5.13±0.04
Conservation tillage	采纳Adopted	6 219.10±53.54^*	0.92±0.01	3.03±0.04^***	4.97±0.03^***
深松技术	不采纳Not adopted	6 305.77±44.37	0.93±0.01	3.09±0.04	4.98±0.02
Subsoiling	采纳Adopted	5 999.05±146.54^**	0.85±0.02^***	3.29±0.11^*	5.34±0.06^***
秸秆还田技术	不采纳Not adopted	6 389.80±69.67	0.93±0.02	3.29±0.06	5.13±0.04
Straw returning	采纳Adopted	6 214.27±53.58^**	0.92±0.01	3.02±0.04^***	4.97±0.03^***

技术 Technology	采纳情况 Adoption status	不同土壤质量的技术采纳率 Adoption rate with different soil quality
技术 Technology	采纳情况 Adoption status	好Good	差Bad
保护性耕作技术 Conservation tillage	不采纳 Not adopted	34.99	45.28^**
保护性耕作技术 Conservation tillage	采纳Adopted	65.01	54.72
深松技术 Subsoiling	不采纳 Not adopted	91.09	95.28
深松技术 Subsoiling	采纳Adopted	8.91	4.72
秸秆还田技术 Straw returning	不采纳 Not adopted	36.23	48.11^**
秸秆还田技术 Straw returning	采纳Adopted	63.77	51.89

Effect of policy incentives on farmer's adoption behavior of conservation tillage technologies: based on the perspectives of factor quality and time preference

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 28

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

技术 Technology	采纳情况 Adoption status	不同农户的技术采纳率 Adoption rate of different farmers
技术 Technology	采纳情况 Adoption status	小农户 Small household	规模户 Scale household
保护性耕作技术 Conservation tillage	不采纳 Not adopted	38.18	33.82^**
保护性耕作技术 Conservation tillage	采纳Adopted	61.82	66.18
深松技术 Subsoiling	不采纳 Not adopted	93.82	89.49^***
深松技术 Subsoiling	采纳Adopted	6.18	10.51
秸秆还田技术 Straw returning	不采纳 Not adopted	39.57	35.14^*
秸秆还田技术 Straw returning	采纳Adopted	60.43	64.86

指标	E₁	E₁	E₁	E₂	E₂	E₂	E₃	E₃	E₃	E₄	E₄	E₄
Index
B₁	226.30^** (2.45)	—	—	0.04^** (2.34)	—	—	0.01 (0.05)	—	—	-0.07 (-1.62)	—	—
B₂	—	237.85^* (1.78)	—	—	0.01 (0.42)	—	—	0.02 (0.18)	—	—	0.07 (0.97)	—
B₃	—	—	219.30^** (2.32)	—	—	0.05^*** (2.77)	—	—	0.02 (0.38)	—	—	-0.04 (-0.90)
常数项 Constant	3 390.98^*** (4.60)	3 415.14^*** (4.61)	3 408.71^*** (4.63)	1.37^*** (8.21)	1.39^*** (8.34)	1.37^*** (8.23)	4.08^*** (7.46)	4.08^*** (7.45)	4.07^*** (7.46)	4.92^*** (11.97)	4.89^*** (12.05)	4.90^*** (11.98)
F	28.23^***	27.56^***	27.83^***	23.88^***	22.99^***	24.09^***	40.79^***	41.40^***	40.92^***	23.11^***	23.30^***	23.09^***
n	1 475	1 475	1 475	732	732	732	732	732	732	732	732	732

变量Variable	B₁	B₁	B₂	B₂	B₃	B₃
P_i	0.21^* (1.96)	0.15 (1.35)	3.32^*** (10.67)	3.32^*** (10.60)	0.20^* (1.78)	0.14 (1.21)
M₁	-0.07 (-0.52)	-0.21 (-1.33)	0.02 (0.09)	0.02 (0.06)	-0.12 (-0.85)	-0.25 (-1.60)
P_i×M₁	—	0.77^* (1.95)	—	Omitted	—	0.72^* (1.80)
n	1 475	1 475	1 475	1 474	1 475	1 475
Wald统计量Static value of Wald	277.41^***	279.32^***	187.16^***	185.56^***	297.69^***	299.97^***

变量Variable	B₁	B₁	B₂	B₂	B₃	B₃
P_i	0.21^* (1.96)	0.22 (1.12)	3.32^*** (10.67)	4.03^*** (8.19)	0.20^* (1.78)	0.13 (0.66)
M₂	0.32^*** (3.84)	0.31^*** (3.40)	0.40^*** (2.97)	0.49^*** (3.27)	0.34^*** (4.10)	0.32^*** (3.55)
P_i×M₂	—	-0.02 (-0.09)	—	-1.25^** (-2.11)	—	0.09 (0.37)
n	1 475	1 475	1 475	1 474	1 475	1 475
Wald统计量Static value of Wald	277.41^***	271.14^***	187.16^***	209.65^***	297.69^***	294.05^***

[1]	SU Yang, SHANG Xiaolan, QIAN Zhongming, WU Lingen, HUANG Jiaqi, ZHUANG Haifeng, ZHAO Yufei, DANG Hongyang, XU Lijun. Effects of synergistic enhancement of straw returning to the field with decomposition agent and biochar on soil quality and rice growth [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1139-1148.
[2]	FU Zhiqiang, LIU Zhen, MA Chunhua, WEN Mengling, XI Ruchun. Effects of biochar and biochar-based fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1634-1645.
[3]	CUI Lingyu, YU Man, QIAO Yuying, SU Yao, WANG Yunlong, SHEN Alin. Research trend of soil quality assessment and microbiological indicators based on Web of Science database [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(11): 2688-2697.
[4]	QIU Lefeng, ZHANG Ling, XU Baogen, WU Shaohua, XU Mingxing. Effects of non-grain transition of agricultural planting structure on nitrogen and phosphorus loss from cultivated land [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1995-2003.
[5]	SUN Wenyan, LIU Xiaogang, ZHANG Wenhui, LI Huiyong, WU Lang, YANG Qiliang, XIONG Guomei. Optimization of drip fertigation scheme for Coffea arabica based on soil quality index [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 566-573.
[6]	LIN Wei, ZHOU Haixia, LAN Zhiqian, ZHANG Kaige, LIU Jiqing, ZHANG Xueyan. Application of formula fertilizer based on sunflower stem ammonium sulfate bio-based fertilizer in different growth stages of tomato [J]. , 2019, 31(5): 756-765.
[7]	WANG Jingwen, XIE Guoxiong, LI Dan, ZHANG Mingkui. Combined effects of salinization and acidification on cadmium activation in greenhouse soil [J]. , 2018, 30(5): 810-816.
[8]	MA Nan, QIAN Ruixue, YANG Huimin, CHEN Zhiwen, JIANG Yunfeng. Effects of no tillage and stubble mulch on soil meso-microfauna communities [J]. , 2018, 30(5): 825-831.
[9]	WU Cai\\|wu， XIA Jian\\|xin*. Soil and water conservation mechanism of conservation tillage and its promotion suggestions in the black soil zone of Northeast China [J]. , 2015, 27(2): 254-.
[10]	WANG Wei-ping;ZHU Feng-xiang;CHEN Xiao-yang;XUE Zhi-yong;HONG Chun-lai;LIU Jian;. Effect of biogas slurry irrigation on soil quality and yield quality in Brassica chinensis* [J]. , 2010, 22(1): 0-76.