Development and application of bio-organic fertilizers for prevention and control of bacterial wilt of Curcuma wenyujin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.03.16

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 630-638.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.03.16

• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles

Development and application of bio-organic fertilizers for prevention and control of bacterial wilt of Curcuma wenyujin

FENG Lin(), ZHOU Quan, CHEN Weiliang, MAO Bizeng^*()

Key Laboratory of Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects of Zhejiang Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Key Lab of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2022-04-22 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-04-07

Abstract

Abstract:

Bacterial wilt of Curcuma wenyujin (BWCW) caused by Ralstonia solanaceraum was becoming a common destructive disease in the planting of C. wenyujin at present. In order to control the disease, a bio-organic fertilizer (BOF) was developed by using Paenibacillus jamila ZJU-C612-3 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ZJU-C612-4, which were screened early in our laboratory and showed strong antagonistic activities to R. solanaceraum. The incidence rate of C. wenyujin tuber treated with BOF in greenhouse pot culture was reduced by 60 percentage point. After using 200 kg BOF in 667 m² field, the incidence rate of healthy C. wenyujin tuber was reduced by 17.66 percentage point, and the plants grew well. In addition, the BOF could alleviate the monocropping obstacle of C. wenyujin. After applying bio-organic fertilizer in the 5-year continuous cropping field, the incidence rate of continuous cropping C. wenyujin tuber decreased by 9.43 percentage point and 19.75 percentage point in July and August. This study result could provide a basis for the industrialized development of bio-organic fertilizer for the control of bacterial wilt of C. wenyujin in future.

Key words: Curcuma wenyujin, bacterial wilt, bio-organic fertilizer, bacterial wilt, incidence rate

CLC Number:

S476

FENG Lin, ZHOU Quan, CHEN Weiliang, MAO Bizeng. Development and application of bio-organic fertilizers for prevention and control of bacterial wilt of Curcuma wenyujin[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 630-638.

Figures/Tables 10

References 24

[1]	马蕾, 徐丹彬, 陈红金, 等. 浙江省中药材产业提升发展现状与对策[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2016, 36(4): 75-80.
	MA L, XU D B, CHEN H J, et al. Current situation and countermeasures of traditional Chinese medicines in Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36(4): 75-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	冯林. 温郁金细菌性枯萎病菌的鉴定及其生防菌的筛选与应用研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2020.
	FENG L. The identification of pathogen and the screeing and application of bio-control bacterial strains on the bacterial wilt of Curcuma wenyujin[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	曾欣, 练美林, 毛碧增. 温郁金化学成分、药理作用及病害研究进展[J]. 药物生物技术, 2017, 24(6): 554-560.
	ZENG X, LIAN M L, MAO B Z. The research progress in chemical components, pharmacological activity and main pathogenic diseases in Curcuma wenyujin[J]. Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2017, 24(6): 554-560. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	顾艳, 梅瑜, 徐世强, 等. 药用植物连作障碍研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2021, 48(12): 162-173.
	GU Y, MEI Y, XU S Q, et al. Research progress on continuous cropping obstacles of medicinal plants[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 48(12): 162-173. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	常肖锐, 叶项宇, 王政, 等. 生物有机肥研究及应用进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(22): 145-148.
	CHANG X R, YE X Y, WANG Z, et al. Research and application progress on bio-organic fertilizer[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(22): 145-148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	王连平, 谢昀烨, 方丽, 等. 温郁金细菌性枯萎病防控药剂筛选[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(8): 1415-1418.
	WANG L P, XIE Y Y, FANG L, et al. Screening of control agents for bacterial wilt of Curcuma wenyujin[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 58(8): 1415-1418. (in Chinese)
[7]	李庆康, 张永春, 杨其飞, 等. 生物有机肥肥效机理及应用前景展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2003, 11(2): 78-80.
	LI Q K, ZHANG Y C, YANG Q F, et al. The concept, mechanism, affecting factors and prospect of applying bio-organic fertilizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2003, 11(2): 78-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	刘玮琦, 茆振川, 杨宇红, 等. 应用16S rRNA基因文库技术分析土壤细菌群落的多样性[J]. 微生物学报, 2008, 48(10): 1344-1350.
	LIU W Q, MAO Z C, YANG Y H, et al. Analysis of soil bacterial diversity by Using the 16S rRNA gene Library[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2008, 48(10): 1344-1350. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	陈谦, 张新雄, 赵海, 等. 生物有机肥中几种功能微生物的研究及应用概况[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2010, 16(2): 294-300.
	CHEN Q, ZHANG X X, ZHAO H, et al. Advance in research and application of some functional microbes in bio-organic fertilizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2010, 16(2): 294-300. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	黄新琦, 雍晓雨, 沈其荣, 等. 土传黄瓜立枯病高效拮抗菌的筛选鉴定及其生物效应[J]. 植物保护学报, 2012, 39(1): 45-50.
	HUANG X Q, YONG X Y, SHEN Q R, et al. Screening and identifying antagonistic bacteria against Rhizoctonia solani and their biological control effects on soil-born damping-off disease of cucumber[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2012, 39(1): 45-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	张斌, 乔俊卿, 梁雪杰, 等. 番茄枯萎病菌和青枯病菌拮抗细菌的评价[J]. 植物保护学报, 2015, 42(3): 353-361.
	ZHANG B, QIAO J Q, LIANG X J, et al. Evaluation of antagonistic bacteria against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.lycopersici and Ralstonia solanacearum[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2015, 42(3): 353-361. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	康贻军, 程洁, 梅丽娟, 等. 植物根际促生菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 微生物学报, 2010, 50(7): 853-861.
	KANG Y J, CHENG J, MEI L J, et al. Screening and identification of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2010, 50(7): 853-861. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	赵文娟, 付博, 徐升运, 等. 生防菌SF1103、SF1104对黄瓜枯萎病菌的拮抗作用[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(10):1537-1543.
	ZHAO W J, FU B, XU S Y, et al. Antagonism of biocontrol bacteria SF1103 and SF1104 on wilt pathogen in cucumber[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2017, 26(10):1537-1543. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	GHOSE T K. Measurement of cellulase activities[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1987, 59(2): 257-268. DOI URL
[15]	SHIN S H, LIM Y, LEE S E, et al. CAS agar diffusion assay for the measurement of siderophores in biological fluids[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2001, 44(1): 89-95. PMID
[16]	JOACHIM V, BEN N, KRISTIN D, et al. Characterization of novel fusaricidins produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa-M1 using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2015, 26(9):1548-1558. DOI URL
[17]	李兴玉, 毛自朝, 吴毅歆, 等. 芽孢杆菌环脂肽类次生代谢产物的快速检测[J]. 植物病理学报, 2014, 44(6): 718-722.
	LI X Y, MAO Z C, WU Y X, et al. Rapid detection of cyclic lipopeptide metabolites from Bacillus[J]. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2014, 44(6): 718-722. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	王佳宁, 王玉鑫, 侯如娇, 等. 噬菌体鸡尾酒联合生物有机肥防控番茄青枯病的效果研究[J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(9): 3194-3204.
	WANG J N, WANG Y X, HOU R J, et al. Biocontrol of phage cocktail combined with bio-organic fertilizer on tomato bacterial wilt[J]. Microbiology China, 2021, 48(9): 3194-3204. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	郭赛赛, 张敬泽. 多黏类芽孢杆菌及其脂肽化合物研究进展[J]. 农药学学报, 2019, 21(S1): 787-798.
	GUO S S, ZHANG J Z. Research progress of Paenibacillus polymyxa and its lipopeptide compounds[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2019, 21(S1): 787-798. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	IDRISS E E, MAKAREWICZ O, FAROUK A, et al. Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect[J]. Microbiology(Reading, England), 2002, 148(7): 2097-2109. DOI URL
[21]	汪汉成, 黄艳飞, 龙明锦, 等. 烟草青枯病菌与其拮抗菌解淀粉芽胞杆菌的代谢表型差异分析[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(5): 753-762.
	WANG H C, HUANG Y F, LONG M J, et al. Analysis of the difference in metabolic phenotypes between Ralstonia solanacearum from tobacco and its antagonistic bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2017, 44(5): 753-762. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	TIMMUSK S, VAN WEST P, GOW N A R, et al. Paenibacillus polymyxa antagonizes oomycete plant pathogens Phytophthora palmivora and Pythium aphanidermatum[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2009, 106(5): 1473-1481. DOI URL
[23]	吴李芳. 西红花球茎腐烂病的致病菌鉴定及其生防菌解淀粉芽孢杆菌C612的筛选和应用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.
	WU L F. Identification of Crocus sativus corm rot pathogenic fungi and application on screening Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C612[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	OOSTENDORP M, KUNZ W, DIETRICH B, et al. Induced disease resistance in plants by chemicals[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2001, 107(1): 19-28. DOI URL

质荷比 Mass-to- charge ratio	离子型 Ionic type	化合物 Compound	P. jamilae ZJU-C612-3
883.56	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin A	+
897.58	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin B	+
911.59	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin E	+
925.61	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin F	+
947.56	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin C	+
961.57	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin D	+
975.59	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin G	+
931.56	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin H	+
945.58	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin I	+
959.90	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin J	+
939.62	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin E	+
953.64	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin F	—
957.59	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin C	—
989.60	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin D	+
1003.62	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin G	—
973.61	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin I	+
987.62	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin J	—
981.67	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin F	—
1 017.63	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin D	—
1 031.65	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin G	—
1 001.64	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin I	+
1015.65	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin J	—
919.8	[M+Na]+	Fusaricidin B	+
935.8	[M+K]+	Fusaricidin B	+
961.9	[M+H]+	FusaricidinD	+
968.9	[M+H]+	NI	+
1 191.9	[M+H]+	C9 Polymyxin P	+
1 213.9	[M+Na]+	C9 Polymyxin P	—
1 203.9	[M+H]+	C9 Polymyxin B	—
1 225.9	[M+Na]+	C9 Polymyxin B	—

质荷比 Mass-to- charge ratio	离子型 Ionic type	化合物 Compound	P. jamilae ZJU-C612-3
883.56	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin A	+
897.58	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin B	+
911.59	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin E	+
925.61	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin F	+
947.56	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin C	+
961.57	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin D	+
975.59	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin G	+
931.56	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin H	+
945.58	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin I	+
959.90	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin J	+
939.62	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin E	+
953.64	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin F	—
957.59	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin C	—
989.60	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin D	+
1003.62	[M+H]+	C17 Fusaricidin G	—
973.61	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin I	+
987.62	[M+H]+	C15 Fusaricidin J	—
981.67	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin F	—
1 017.63	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin D	—
1 031.65	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin G	—
1 001.64	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin I	+
1015.65	[M+H]+	C18 Fusaricidin J	—
919.8	[M+Na]+	Fusaricidin B	+
935.8	[M+K]+	Fusaricidin B	+
961.9	[M+H]+	FusaricidinD	+
968.9	[M+H]+	NI	+
1 191.9	[M+H]+	C9 Polymyxin P	+
1 213.9	[M+Na]+	C9 Polymyxin P	—
1 203.9	[M+H]+	C9 Polymyxin B	—
1 225.9	[M+Na]+	C9 Polymyxin B	—

质荷比 Mass-to- charge ratio	离子型 Ionic type	化合物 Compound	B. amyloli- quefaciens ZJU-C612-4
1 045.693	[M+K]+	C13 Surfactin	—
1 060.793	[M+K]+	C14 Surfactin	+
1 069.694	[M+K]+	C14 Bacillomycin D	+
1 075.861	[M+K]+	C15 Surfactin	+
1 083.742	[M+K]+	C15 Bacillomycin D	+
1 097.788	[M+K]+	C16 Bacillomycin D	+
1 109.733	[M+K]+	C16 Bacillomycin F	+
1 436.194	[M+H]+	C14 Fengycin	—
1 466.251	NI	NI	+
1 478.274	[M+H]+	C17 Fengycin A	+
1 502.230	[M+K]+	C16 Fengycin A	+
1 516.267	[M+K]+	C17 Fengycin A	+
1 529.8	[M+K]+	C18 Fengycin A	+
1 557.8	[M+K]+	C20 Fengycin A	+

质荷比 Mass-to- charge ratio	离子型 Ionic type	化合物 Compound	B. amyloli- quefaciens ZJU-C612-4
1 045.693	[M+K]+	C13 Surfactin	—
1 060.793	[M+K]+	C14 Surfactin	+
1 069.694	[M+K]+	C14 Bacillomycin D	+
1 075.861	[M+K]+	C15 Surfactin	+
1 083.742	[M+K]+	C15 Bacillomycin D	+
1 097.788	[M+K]+	C16 Bacillomycin D	+
1 109.733	[M+K]+	C16 Bacillomycin F	+
1 436.194	[M+H]+	C14 Fengycin	—
1 466.251	NI	NI	+
1 478.274	[M+H]+	C17 Fengycin A	+
1 502.230	[M+K]+	C16 Fengycin A	+
1 516.267	[M+K]+	C17 Fengycin A	+
1 529.8	[M+K]+	C18 Fengycin A	+
1 557.8	[M+K]+	C20 Fengycin A	+

项目名称 Entry name	NY884—2012规定指标 NY884—2012 specified indicators	NY525—2012规定指标 NY525—2012 specified indicators	生物有机肥实测指标 Bio organic fertilizer index
有效活菌数Effective viable count/(10⁸ g^-1)	≥0.2	—	10
有机质(以烘干计)Organic matter/%	≥40	≥45	54.40
总养分(N+P₂O₅+K₂O) Total nutrient/%	—	≥5	2.40+3.28+1.78
水分Water content/%	≤30	≤30	19.30
pH	5.5~8.5	5.5~8.5	6.9
总砷(以干基计)As/(mg·kg^-1)	≤15	≤15	3.40
总汞(以干基计)Hg/(mg·kg^-1)	≤2	≤2	0.10
总铅(以干基计)Pb/(mg·kg^-1)	≤50	≤50	12.20
总镉(以干基计)Cd/(mg·kg^-1)	≤3	≤3	0.30
总铬(以干基计)Cr/(mg·kg^-1)	≤150	≤150	57.60
粪大肠埃希菌群Fecal coliform/g^-1	≤100	≤100	<0.3
蛔虫卵死亡率Ascaris egg mortality/%	≥95	≥95	100.00

Development and application of bio-organic fertilizers for prevention and control of bacterial wilt of Curcuma wenyujin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 24

Related Articles 8

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

处理 Treatment	发病率 Incidence rate/%	生长状况 Growth status
1	100 a	所有植株枯萎死亡All plants wither and die
2	66.70±6.67 b	存活植株长势较差,叶片褪绿,叶缘枯黄
		The surviving plants grew poorly, leaf edges were withered and yellow
3	40.00±6.67 c	存活植株长势较为健壮,叶片未褪色The surviving plants grew well and the leaves were not faded
4	66.70±13.33 b	存活植株长势较差,叶片褪绿The surviving plants grew poorly and their leaves faded

处理 Treatment	处理方式 Treatment method	平均单株产量 Average yield per plant/kg
1	常规根茎+复合肥 Conventional tuber+compound fertilizer	0.60±0.32
2	连作根茎+复合肥 Continuous cropping tuber+ compound fertilizer	0.37±0.16
3	常规根茎+BOF Conventional tuber+BOF	1.16±0.41
4	连作根茎+BOF Continuous cropping tuber+BOF	0.71±0.29

[1]	YANG Shengzhu, LI Xiang, LI Chaowen, CHEN Hainian, LIU Li, LU Yingang, CAO Zhuoyang. Characteristics of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in rhizosphere of tobacco affected by bacterial wilt in Guizhou Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 146-155.
[2]	RU Chao, YU Jihua, WU Yue, FENG Zhi, GOU Zhaohui, JIN Ning, WANG Shuya, LIU Zeci, LYU Jian. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying bio-organic fertilizer on yield and quality of Chinese cabbage in open field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637.
[3]	ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, WANG Dongwang, LIANG Yonghui, LIU Ruhua. Effect of water-fertilizer interaction on yield, quality and soil nutrients of drip irrigated jujube [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2428-2437.
[4]	LI Ju, XIE Bojie, WEI Shouhui, ZHANG Guobin, WU Yue, TANG Zhongqi, XIAO Xuemei, YU Jihua. Effects of combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on nutritional quality and volatile compounds of cauliflower [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1199-1211.
[5]	LIN Rui, REN Haiying, AN Xiaoxiao, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Shuwen, QI Xingjiang. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on twig blight disease control and recovery of tree vigor in bayberry [J]. , 2019, 31(7): 1096-1104.
[6]	WANG Yanyun, ZHAO Longjie, HAO Chunli, CAI Jinzhong. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil microbial population and enzymes activities under different continuous cropping years of protected cucumber [J]. , 2019, 31(4): 631-638.
[7]	ZHOU Yanchao, WU Yanhong, TIAN Xingwu, ZHOU Haixia, HAN Zeyu, LIU Jiqing, LAN Zhiqian, ZHANG Xueyan. Effect of nano-carbon sol and Bacillus subtilis on cucumber growth and soil environment [J]. , 2019, 31(3): 392-400.
[8]	WANG Han—rong;*;RU Shui—jiang;WANG Lian—ping;FANG Li;REN Haj—ying;FENG Zhong-min . Control of tomato bacterial wilt with grafting [J]. , 2009, 21(3): 0-287.