Evaluation on rural environment governance modernization level: year of 2019 as an example

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.18

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 913-921.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.18

• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation on rural environment governance modernization level: year of 2019 as an example

ZHANG Wanjun¹(), ZHU Lizhong¹^,², CHEN Dingjiang¹^,², WU Donglei¹^,², WANG Feier¹^,², ZHANG Qingyu¹^,²^,^*()

1. College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. Zhejiang Academy of Ecological Civilization, Huzhou 313300, China

Received:2022-03-03 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-05-05

Abstract

Abstract:

From three dimensions of living environment, ecological environment and assurance system, 19 indexes were selected to construct an evaluation index system for rural environment governance modernization level. The indexes weights were determined by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Delphi method, and the indexes values were determined by the efficacy coefficient method. Based on the data of 1 818 county-level administrative districts in 2019, the modernization level of rural environment governance was evaluated. The results showed that the modernization level of rural environment governance of China at county level belonged to the general level, with an average value of 0.350. The county-level administrative districts, which reached the excellent level, were mainly distributed in the eastern region. There were large regional differences in the modernization level of rural environment governance in China. The living environment in the western region was weak. The main restricting dimension in all regions was the assurance system. Based on these findings, suggestions were put forward, such as establishing a mutual assistance and cooperation mechanism and a long-term infrastructure operation and management mechanism to promote the coordinated development of rural environment governance modernization level in different regions, and strengthening the assurance system and mechanism to make up for the shortcomings of the modernization level of rural environmental governance.

Key words: rural environment governance, modernization, evaluation index system, rural revitalization

CLC Number:

S-9
X321

ZHANG Wanjun, ZHU Lizhong, CHEN Dingjiang, WU Donglei, WANG Feier, ZHANG Qingyu. Evaluation on rural environment governance modernization level: year of 2019 as an example[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 913-921.

Figures/Tables 7

References 24

[1]	张应武, 欧阳子怡. 我国农业农村现代化发展水平动态演进及比较[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(20): 95-98.
	ZHANG Y W, OUYANG Z Y. Dynamic evolution and comparative analysis of development level of China’s agricultural and rural modernization[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2019, 35(20): 95-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	郝妙春. 西部地区乡村振兴指标体系构建及实证分析[J]. 商业经济, 2021(12): 121-122.
	HAO M C. Construction and empirical analysis of the index system of rural revitalization in the western region[J]. Business & Economy, 2021(12): 121-122. (in Chinese)
[3]	李娜. 广西乡村振兴耦合协调水平实证研究[J]. 中国商论, 2021(22): 188-192.
	LI N. An empirical study on coupling coordination degree of rural revitalization in Guangxi[J]. China Journal of Commerce, 2021(22): 188-192. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	杜国明, 薛濡壕, 王介勇. 村域尺度乡村振兴评价及推进路径: 以黑龙江省拜泉县为例[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(8): 19-27.
	DU G M, XUE R H, WANG J Y. Rural revitalization evaluation and promotion path based on village level: taking Baiquan, Heilongjiang, China as a case study[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(8): 19-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	辛岭, 刘衡, 胡志全. 我国农业农村现代化的区域差异及影响因素分析[J]. 经济纵横, 2021(12): 101-114.
	XIN L, LIU H, HU Z Q. The temporal and spatial evolution and influencing factors of China’s agricultural and rural modernization[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2021(12): 101-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	张玉英, 吕剑平. 基于“三农”及城乡融合四维度的农业农村现代化发展水平评价: 以甘肃省为例[J]. 南方农村, 2021, 37(5): 18-26.
	ZHANG Y Y, LYU J P. Evaluation of the development level of agricultural and rural modernization based on the four dimensions of “agriculture, rural areas and farmers” and urban-rural integration: a case study of Gansu Province[J]. South China Rural Area, 2021, 37(5): 18-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	章磷, 姜楠. 黑龙江省农业农村现代化发展水平综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(16): 161-169.
	ZHANG L, JIANG N. Comprehensive evaluation on the development level of agricultural and rural modernization in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021(16): 161-169. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	覃诚, 汪宝, 陈典, 等. 中国分地区农业农村现代化发展水平评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(4): 173-182.
	QIN C, WANG B, CHEN D, et al. Evaluation on the development level of agricultural and rural modernization by regions in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(4): 173-182. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	姜长云, 李俊茹. 2035年中国特色的农业农村现代化指标体系研究[J]. 全球化, 2021(4): 92-108.
	JIANG C Y, LI J R. Research on the index system of agricultural and rural modernization with Chinese characteristics in 2035[J]. Globalization, 2021(4): 92-108. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	国务院发展研究中心农村经济研究部课题组. 新发展阶段农业农村现代化的内涵特征和评价体系[J]. 改革, 2021(9): 1-15.
	Research Group of Research Department of Rural Economic, Development Research Center of the State Council. The connotation and evaluation system of agricultural and rural modernization in the new development stage[J]. Reform, 2021(9): 1-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	郑满生, 姜仁珍. 区域农村生态环境发展水平评价与分析: 以山东省为例[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(6): 1583-1588.
	ZHENG M S, JIANG R Z. Evaluation and analysis on the development level of regional rural eco-environment: a case study of Shandong Province[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 36(6): 1583-1588. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	代凡凡, 许天一, 赵小汎. 辽宁省农村人居环境评价[J]. 区域治理, 2019(38): 11-13.
	DAI F F, XU T Y, ZHAO X F. Evaluation of rural human settlement environment in Liaoning Province[J]. Regional Governance, 2019(38): 11-13. (in Chinese)
[13]	宾津佑, 唐小兵, 陈士银. 广东省县域乡村人居环境质量评价及其影响因素[J]. 生态经济, 2021, 37(12): 203-209.
	BIN J Y, TANG X B, CHEN S Y. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of rural human settlement quality in Guangdong Province[J]. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(12): 203-209. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	朱建田. 国家治理现代化的评价指标及建构路径探讨[J]. 天中学刊, 2017, 32(2): 12-16.
	ZHU J T. On the evaluation index and construction path of the modernization of national governance[J]. Journal of Tianzhong, 2017, 32(2): 12-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	王星. 新发展阶段我国乡村治理现代化研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆工商大学, 2021.
	WANG X. Study on the modernization of rural governance in China in the new development stage[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Technology and Business University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	邓玲, 王芳. 乡村振兴背景下农村生态的现代化转型[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2019(3): 101-108.
	DENG L, WANG F. The modernization transformation of rural ecology under the background of rural revitalization[J]. Gansu Social Sciences, 2019(3): 101-108. (in Chinese)
[17]	潘星. 县域发展评价指标体系优化研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2013.
	PAN X. The optimization research on evaluation index system of county development[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	潘张蕤. 县域“两山”发展评价指标体系构建与应用研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019.
	PAN Z R. Study on the evaluation index system of county-level development based on the LWLM theory[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	CHANG D Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 95(3): 649-655. DOI URL
[20]	LI X G, ZHANG Q. AHP-based resources and environment efficiency evaluation index system construction about the west side of Taiwan Straits[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 228(1): 97-111. DOI URL
[21]	OKOLI C, PAWLOWSKI S D. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications[J]. Information & Management, 2004, 42(1): 15-29. DOI URL
[22]	QIU D H, LI S C, ZHANG L W. Study on rockburst intensity prediction based on efficacy coefficient method[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 353/354/355/356: 1277-1280.
[23]	邸菲, 胡志全. 我国农业现代化评价指标体系的构建与应用[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(6): 46-56.
	DI F, HU Z Q. Construction and application of China’s agricultural modernizarion evaluation index system[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(6): 46-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	钱佰慧, 陈思霖, 徐洋, 等. 农村现代化水平评价指标体系构建与测度分析[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2021(6): 39-49.
	QIAN B H, CHEN S L, XU Y, et al. Construction and measure analysis of evaluation index system of rural modernization level[J]. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2021(6): 39-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)

目标层 Target layer	准则层 Criterion layer	指标层 Index layer	权重 Weight
(A)乡村环境治理	(B1)人居环境	(C11)饮用水卫生合格率Hygienic qualification rate of drinking water/%	0.079 9
现代化	Living environment	(C12)农村卫生厕所普及率Popularization rate of rural sanitary toilets/%	0.070 4
Rural environment		(C13)生活污水处理率Domestic sewage treatment rate/%	0.070 4
governance		(C14)生活垃圾无害化处理率Harmless treatment rate of domestic garbage/%	0.070 4
modernization		(C15)农村居民人均可支配收入Per capita disposable income of rural residents/%	0.050 1
	(B2)生态环境	(C21)土壤质量达标率Soil quality compliance rate/%	0.060 0
	Ecological	(C22)空气质量达标率Air quality compliance rate/%	0.070 4
	environment	(C23)地表水功能区水质达标率 Water quality compliance rate of surface water function zone/%	0.070 4
		(C24)林草覆盖率Forest and grass coverage rate/%	0.049 9
		(C25)湿地保护率Wetland protection rate/%	0.049 9
		(C26)生态环境状况指数变化Changes of ecological environment status index	0.060 0
		(C27)生态系统生产总值Gross ecosystem product (GEP)/yuan	0.009 9
		(C28)GDP自然消耗系数GDP natural consumption coefficient	0.009 9
		(C29)单位面积耕地化肥施用量 Application amount of chemical fertilizer per unit area of cultivated land/(kg·hm^-2)	0.049 9
	(B3)保障体系	(C31)美丽村庄占比Proportion of beautiful villages/%	0.039 7
	Assurance system	(C32)生态环境公众满意度Public satisfaction of ecological environment/%	0.069 6
		(C33)“两山”转化体制机制创新 Innovation on transformation system and mechanism of “Two Mountains”	0.039 7
		(C34)人为重大环境污染事故Man-made major environmental pollution accidents	0.039 7
		(C35)生态环境相关荣誉Honors related to ecological environment	0.039 7

目标层 Target layer	准则层 Criterion layer	指标层 Index layer	权重 Weight
(A)乡村环境治理	(B1)人居环境	(C11)饮用水卫生合格率Hygienic qualification rate of drinking water/%	0.079 9
现代化	Living environment	(C12)农村卫生厕所普及率Popularization rate of rural sanitary toilets/%	0.070 4
Rural environment		(C13)生活污水处理率Domestic sewage treatment rate/%	0.070 4
governance		(C14)生活垃圾无害化处理率Harmless treatment rate of domestic garbage/%	0.070 4
modernization		(C15)农村居民人均可支配收入Per capita disposable income of rural residents/%	0.050 1
	(B2)生态环境	(C21)土壤质量达标率Soil quality compliance rate/%	0.060 0
	Ecological	(C22)空气质量达标率Air quality compliance rate/%	0.070 4
	environment	(C23)地表水功能区水质达标率 Water quality compliance rate of surface water function zone/%	0.070 4
		(C24)林草覆盖率Forest and grass coverage rate/%	0.049 9
		(C25)湿地保护率Wetland protection rate/%	0.049 9
		(C26)生态环境状况指数变化Changes of ecological environment status index	0.060 0
		(C27)生态系统生产总值Gross ecosystem product (GEP)/yuan	0.009 9
		(C28)GDP自然消耗系数GDP natural consumption coefficient	0.009 9
		(C29)单位面积耕地化肥施用量 Application amount of chemical fertilizer per unit area of cultivated land/(kg·hm^-2)	0.049 9
	(B3)保障体系	(C31)美丽村庄占比Proportion of beautiful villages/%	0.039 7
	Assurance system	(C32)生态环境公众满意度Public satisfaction of ecological environment/%	0.069 6
		(C33)“两山”转化体制机制创新 Innovation on transformation system and mechanism of “Two Mountains”	0.039 7
		(C34)人为重大环境污染事故Man-made major environmental pollution accidents	0.039 7
		(C35)生态环境相关荣誉Honors related to ecological environment	0.039 7

指标 Index	指标类型 Indicator type	满意值 Satisfaction value	不允许值 Disallowed value
C11	约束性Binding	100	80
C12	约束性Binding	90	80
C13	约束性Binding	95	85
C14	约束性Binding	100	80
C15	约束性Binding	17 304	11 369
C21	约束性Binding	—	—
C22	约束性Binding	96	77
C23	约束性Binding	95	73
C24	约束性Binding	64	33
C25	约束性Binding	—	—
C26	约束性Binding	明显变好Noticeably better	略微变差Slightly worse
C27	预期性Anticipating	—	—
C28	约束性Binding	—	—
C29	约束性Binding	50	70
C31	约束性Binding	2	0.1
C32	约束性Binding	87	76
C33	预期性Anticipating	有Yes	无No
C34	预期性Anticipating	无No	有Yes
C35	预期性Anticipating	有Yes	无No

指标 Index	指标类型 Indicator type	满意值 Satisfaction value	不允许值 Disallowed value
C11	约束性Binding	100	80
C12	约束性Binding	90	80
C13	约束性Binding	95	85
C14	约束性Binding	100	80
C15	约束性Binding	17 304	11 369
C21	约束性Binding	—	—
C22	约束性Binding	96	77
C23	约束性Binding	95	73
C24	约束性Binding	64	33
C25	约束性Binding	—	—
C26	约束性Binding	明显变好Noticeably better	略微变差Slightly worse
C27	预期性Anticipating	—	—
C28	约束性Binding	—	—
C29	约束性Binding	50	70
C31	约束性Binding	2	0.1
C32	约束性Binding	87	76
C33	预期性Anticipating	有Yes	无No
C34	预期性Anticipating	无No	有Yes
C35	预期性Anticipating	有Yes	无No

位次区间 Rank interval	F	等级 Grade
[0%,25%)	(0.466,1.000]	优秀Excellent
[25%,50%)	(0.358, 0.466]	良好Good
[50%,100%]	[0,0.358]	一般Average

Evaluation on rural environment governance modernization level: year of 2019 as an example

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 24

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YIN Xiyang, CHEN Yixuan, LI Dongmei, YU Xi. Evaluation and spatiotemporal evolution of agricultural supply quality in China in 2003-2019 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 2043-2054.
[2]	FU Jiayi, TONG Lei, SU Fei, ZHENG Ke, LI Hailin, CAO Yirong, SU Na. Driving effect and influence path of “agricultural makers” in rural development of Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1796-1805.
[3]	LU Jingyi, XIANG Keheng. Research on driving factors and combination path configuration of rural cultural tourism entrepreneurship of “new farmers” [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2553-2566.
[4]	WEI Lingling, TONG Zaikang, LUO Limin, SHEN Xi. Innovation of sci-tech commissioner system from perspective of rural revitalization:taking Zhejiang Province as an example [J]. , 2020, 32(7): 1311-1316.
[5]	YU Bin, WANG Weifang. Technological innovation empowered by ownership structure optimization:an empirical study based on panel data of Zhejiang agricultural leading enterprises [J]. , 2020, 32(5): 931-940.
[6]	WEI Suhao, LIU Yingran, GAO Yanlei, ZONG Gang. Evaluation of China’s agricultural modernization and evolution of its spatial pattern [J]. , 2019, 31(6): 1012-1020.
[7]	HU Bao, XIE Xiaomei. Typical models and innovation path on promoting high quality rural revitalization in Zhejiang [J]. , 2019, 31(3): 496-502.
[8]	REN Wei, ZHANG Xuewei, LI Fangying, DONG Jianwen. Study on vernacular landscape protection of Wenzhou Sanyang wetland based on landscape fragmentation analysis [J]. , 2019, 31(11): 1841-1854.
[9]	LIN Huan， XU Lin\\|yun*. The development and prospect of agricultural robots in China [J]. , 2015, 27(5): 865-.
[10]	GAO Yun1， ZHAN Hui\\|long2，*， ZHAO Yue\\|long1， LI Shu\\|jun1， JIAO Jian3. Evaluation of competitiveness and regional advantage analysis of National Modern Agriculture Demonstration District#br# [J]. , 2015, 27(10): 1841-.
[11]	KE Fu-yan. Study on governments functions in the process of mountainous areas characteristic agricultural modernization—based on the experiences of bayberry modernization in Xianju County [J]. , 2013, 25(2): 0-385.
[12]	YANG Nian-fang;YAN Feng-xian . The vulnerability analysis and evaluation index system study of the citrus industry chain based on the complex systems [J]. , 2011, 23(1): 164-169.