Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.08

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1307-1314.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.08

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources

BU Yuanpeng¹(), LIU Na¹, ZHANG Guwen¹, FENG Zhijuan¹, WANG Bin¹, GONG Yaming¹, XU Linying²^,^*()

1. Institute of Vegetables, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
2. Cixi Agricultural Technology Promotion Center, Cixi 315300, Zhejiang, China

Received:2022-10-31 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-04

Abstract

Abstract:

The identification and evaluation of germplasm resources is the first step to make full use of elite genes to accelerate the improvement of varieties. In order to explore the genetic diversity of agronomic traits and build an evaluation system for taste quality, 379 vegetable soybean lines widely collected throughout the country were adopted and 25 agronomic traits were investigated in 2 years. The diversity of this whole collection was analyzed and evaluated based on phenotypic data. The results showed that the 25 agronomic traits of the panel contained abundant genetic variation. Except for three quality traits, the diversity index of 22 quantitative traits varied from 1.40 to 2.06. Among the 8 methods of core gemplasm clustering, the core gemplasm constructed by the longest distance method was the most representative, covering all the traits variations of the original gemplasm. Seven key physical and chemical indexes affecting the taste quality of vegetable soybean and six sensory latitudes were determined in this core collection. A multiple linear regression model for vegetable soybean quality was constructed. It was clear that soluble total sugar, oil and total free amino acid contents were three key physical and chemical indexes affecting the taste quality. The three dimensions of sweetness, waxiness and hardness could explain 68.2% of the overall preference change rate. The results of this study are expected to provide a reference for improving the evaluation and utilization efficiency of vegetable soybean germplasm resources and accelerating the cultivation of high-yield and high-quality vegetable soybean varieties.

Key words: vegetable soybean, germplasm resource, agronomic trait, taste quality, diversity evaluation

CLC Number:

S643.7

BU Yuanpeng, LIU Na, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming, XU Linying. Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314.

Figures/Tables 6

References 17

[1]	邱丽娟, 李英慧, 关荣霞, 等. 大豆核心种质和微核心种质的构建、验证与研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(4):571-579.
	QIU L J, LI Y H, GUAN R X, et al. Establishment, representative testing and research progress of soybean core collection and mini core collection[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(4):571-579. (in Chinese)
[2]	盖钧镒, 王明军, 陈长之. 中国毛豆生产的历史渊源与发展[J]. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(1): 7-13.
	GAI J Y, WANG M J, CHEN C Z. Historical origin and development of soybean production in China[J]. Soybean Science, 2002, 21(1): 7-13. (in Chinese)
[3]	KUMAR V, RANI A, GOYAL L, et al. Evaluation of vegetable-type soybean for sucrose, taste-related amino acids, and isoflavones contents[J]. International Journal of Food Properties, 2011, 14(5): 1142-1151.
[4]	吴早贵. 浙江省菜用大豆产业现状及发展对策探讨[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2004, 45(6): 297-299.
	WU Z G. Discussion on the present situation and development countermeasure of vegetable soybean industry of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2004, 45(6): 297-299. (in Chinese)
[5]	KAO C F, HE S S, WANG C S, et al. A modified Roger’s distance algorithm for mixed quantitative-qualitative phenotypes to establish a core collection for Taiwanese vegetable soybeans[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 11: 612106.
[6]	陈学珍, 谢皓, 郑晓宇, 等. 菜用大豆的农艺及品质性状评价与相关性分析[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2005, 20(1): 23-26.
	CHEN X Z, XIE H, ZHENG X Y, et al. Relation analysis and evaluation on agronomic and quality characters in vegetable soybean[J]. Journal of Beijing Agricultural College, 2005, 20(1): 23-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	张玉梅, 胡润芳, 林国强. 菜用大豆品质性状研究进展[J]. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(5): 698-702.
	ZHANG Y M, HU R F, LIN G Q. Research advance on quality traits of vegetable soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2013, 32(5): 698-702. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	BU Y P, ZHANG X, WANG C C, et al. Conditional and unconditional QTL analyses of seed hardness in vegetable soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)[J]. Euphytica, 2018, 214(12): 1-21.
[9]	中华人民共和国农业农村部. 鲜食大豆品种品质: NY/T 3705—2020[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2021.
[10]	MOZZONI L, CHEN P Y. Correlations of yield and quality traits between immature and mature seed stages of edamame soybean[J]. Journal of Crop Improvement, 2019, 33(1): 67-82.
[11]	邱丽娟, 曹永生, 常汝镇, 等. 中国大豆(Glycine max)核心种质构建Ⅰ.取样方法研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(12):1442-1449.
	QIU L J, CAO Y S, CHANG R Z, et al. Establishment of Chinese soybean (G. max) core collection Ⅰ. sampling strategy[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(12):1442-1449. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	邱丽娟, 常汝镇. 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[13]	KRIPPENDORFF K. Mathematical theory of communication[M]//LITTLEJOHN S W, FOSS K A. Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Los Angeles: Sage, 2009.
[14]	FOSS A H, MARKATOU M. kamila: clustering mixed-type data in R and Hadoop[J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 2018, 83(13): 1-44.
[15]	HU J, ZHU J, XU H M. Methods of constructing core collections by stepwise clustering with three sampling strategies based on the genotypic values of crops[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000, 101(1/2): 264-268.
[16]	QIU L J, XING L L, GUO Y, et al. A platform for soybean molecular breeding: the utilization of core collections for food security[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2013, 83(1): 41-50.
[17]	BROWN A H D. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management[J]. Genome, 1989, 31(2): 818-824.

类别 Types	性状 Traits	英文缩写 English abbreviation	变异幅度 Range	平均值±标准差 Mean±SD	多样性指数 H'	变异系数 CV/%
株型 Plant type	下胚轴颜色 Hypocotyl color	HypocotylC	—	—	0.52	—
	花色Flower color	FlowerC	—	—	0.51	—
	茸毛色Pubescence color	PubescenceC	—	—	0.29	—
	主茎节数Number of main stem nodes	NodeN	5.33~19.00	8.84±2.28	1.71	25.79
	有效分枝数Effective number of branches	BranchN	0.00~7.33	3.32±1.10	1.96	33.13
	株高Height/cm	PlantH	11.52~65.37	28.43±10.08	1.68	35.46
产量Yield	单株荚重Pod weight per plant/g	PodWP	24.14~234.78	97.04±30.7	2.01	31.64
	单株荚数Number of pods per plant	PodNP	13.67~233.67	46.16±24.56	1.45	53.21
	百粒鲜重Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	100SFW	16.80~122.50	73.16±21.65	2.04	29.59
	出仁率Kernel percent/%	KernelP	43.90~76.37	59.28±4.14	1.98	6.98
	10荚鲜重Fresh weight of 10 pods/g	10PFW	5.86~57.63	36.79±10.35	1.96	28.13
荚型Pod type	多粒荚比例Ratio of multiple pods	GraininessPR	0.11~0.75	0.39±0.15	2.06	38.46
	荚长Pod length/mm	PodL	35.81~73.27	58.5±6.58	1.95	11.25
	荚宽Pod width/mm	PodW	6.94~13.92	10.64±1.25	2.01	11.75
	荚长宽比Pod aspect ratio	PodAR	2.64~4.30	3.34±0.29	2.01	8.68
	荚平面面积Pod plane area/cm²	PodA	2.70~10.39	6.55±1.36	2.00	20.76
	弯曲夹角Bending angle/(°)	PodBA	129.62~177.96	170.57±7.1	1.40	4.16
	荚绿色强度Pod green intensity	PodGI	0.84~1.78	1.1±0.16	1.75	14.55
生育期	始花期Anthesis	BeginningF	33.50~54.00	39.85±4.22	1.89	10.59
Growth stages	鼓粒期Filling stage	FullS	66.00~109.00	78.54±7.79	1.89	9.92
	生殖生长期Reproductive stage	Reproductive	26.00~60.00	38.70±5.37	1.91	13.88
叶形Leaf type	叶长Leaf length/mm	LeafL	68.51~289.56	136.24±26.88	1.91	19.73
	叶宽Leaf width/mm	LeafW	30.45~115.07	77.00±12.55	1.97	16.30
	叶长宽比Leaf aspect ratio	LeafAR	1.24~3.85	1.80±0.40	1.65	22.22
	叶面积Leaf area/cm²	LeafA	16.23~198.15	72.42±24.76	1.93	34.19

类别 Types	性状 Traits	英文缩写 English abbreviation	变异幅度 Range	平均值±标准差 Mean±SD	多样性指数 H'	变异系数 CV/%
株型 Plant type	下胚轴颜色 Hypocotyl color	HypocotylC	—	—	0.52	—
	花色Flower color	FlowerC	—	—	0.51	—
	茸毛色Pubescence color	PubescenceC	—	—	0.29	—
	主茎节数Number of main stem nodes	NodeN	5.33~19.00	8.84±2.28	1.71	25.79
	有效分枝数Effective number of branches	BranchN	0.00~7.33	3.32±1.10	1.96	33.13
	株高Height/cm	PlantH	11.52~65.37	28.43±10.08	1.68	35.46
产量Yield	单株荚重Pod weight per plant/g	PodWP	24.14~234.78	97.04±30.7	2.01	31.64
	单株荚数Number of pods per plant	PodNP	13.67~233.67	46.16±24.56	1.45	53.21
	百粒鲜重Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	100SFW	16.80~122.50	73.16±21.65	2.04	29.59
	出仁率Kernel percent/%	KernelP	43.90~76.37	59.28±4.14	1.98	6.98
	10荚鲜重Fresh weight of 10 pods/g	10PFW	5.86~57.63	36.79±10.35	1.96	28.13
荚型Pod type	多粒荚比例Ratio of multiple pods	GraininessPR	0.11~0.75	0.39±0.15	2.06	38.46
	荚长Pod length/mm	PodL	35.81~73.27	58.5±6.58	1.95	11.25
	荚宽Pod width/mm	PodW	6.94~13.92	10.64±1.25	2.01	11.75
	荚长宽比Pod aspect ratio	PodAR	2.64~4.30	3.34±0.29	2.01	8.68
	荚平面面积Pod plane area/cm²	PodA	2.70~10.39	6.55±1.36	2.00	20.76
	弯曲夹角Bending angle/(°)	PodBA	129.62~177.96	170.57±7.1	1.40	4.16
	荚绿色强度Pod green intensity	PodGI	0.84~1.78	1.1±0.16	1.75	14.55
生育期	始花期Anthesis	BeginningF	33.50~54.00	39.85±4.22	1.89	10.59
Growth stages	鼓粒期Filling stage	FullS	66.00~109.00	78.54±7.79	1.89	9.92
	生殖生长期Reproductive stage	Reproductive	26.00~60.00	38.70±5.37	1.91	13.88
叶形Leaf type	叶长Leaf length/mm	LeafL	68.51~289.56	136.24±26.88	1.91	19.73
	叶宽Leaf width/mm	LeafW	30.45~115.07	77.00±12.55	1.97	16.30
	叶长宽比Leaf aspect ratio	LeafAR	1.24~3.85	1.80±0.40	1.65	22.22
	叶面积Leaf area/cm²	LeafA	16.23~198.15	72.42±24.76	1.93	34.19

聚类方法 Cluster method	MD	VD	CR	VR
可变法Flexible-beta method	0	60	100	116.86
离差平方和法Ward’s method	4	68	100	117.77
最长距离法Complete linkage	4	76	100	117.61
中间距离法Median method	12	64	100	117.55
类平均法Average linkage	16	76	100	120.25
可变类平均法	20	72	100	118.79
Flexible group average method
重心法Centroid method	56	88	100	122.56
最短距离法Single linkage	64	88	100	124.14

聚类方法 Cluster method	MD	VD	CR	VR
可变法Flexible-beta method	0	60	100	116.86
离差平方和法Ward’s method	4	68	100	117.77
最长距离法Complete linkage	4	76	100	117.61
中间距离法Median method	12	64	100	117.55
类平均法Average linkage	16	76	100	120.25
可变类平均法	20	72	100	118.79
Flexible group average method
重心法Centroid method	56	88	100	122.56
最短距离法Single linkage	64	88	100	124.14

性状 Traits	均值Mean		P_t	方差Variance		P_F	极差Range		变异系数CV/%
性状 Traits	原始种质 Original germplasm	核心种质 Core germplasm	P_t	原始种质 Original germplasm	核心种质 Core germplasm	P_F	原始种质 Original germplasm	核心种质 Core germplasm	原始种质 Original germplasm	核心种质 Core germplasm
主茎节数	8.84	9.45	0.04^*	5.23	8.38	<0.01^**	13.67	13.67	0.26	0.31
Number of main stem nodes
有效分枝数	3.32	3.24	0.56	1.22	1.87	<0.01^**	7.33	7.33	0.33	0.42
Effective number of branches
株高Height/cm	28.43	31.01	0.04^*	101.61	136.02	0.02^*	53.85	53.85	0.35	0.38
单株荚重	97.04	94.52	0.46	942.71	1 208.43	0.05^*	210.64	210.64	0.32	0.37
Pod weight per plant/g
单株荚数	46.16	51.06	0.14	604.65	1 042.08	<0.01^**	220.00	220.00	0.53	0.63
Number of pods per plant
百粒鲜重	73.16	76.73	0.22	469.80	616.87	0.03^*	105.70	105.70	0.30	0.37
Fresh weight of 100 grains/g
出仁率Kernel percent/%	59.28	59.02	0.62	17.14	26.14	<0.01^**	32.47	32.47	0.07	0.09
10荚鲜重	36.79	35.62	0.30	84.95	116.15	0.02^*	51.77	51.77	0.25	0.30
Fresh weight of 10 pods/g
多粒荚比例	0.39	0.40	0.49	0.02	0.02	0.07	0.64	0.64	0.35	0.38
Ratio of multiple pods
荚长Pod length/mm	58.5	57.2	0.1	42.83	58.02	0.02^*	37.46	37.46	0.11	0.13
荚宽Pod width/mm	10.64	10.44	0.17	1.54	2.06	0.02^*	6.98	6.98	0.12	0.14
荚长宽比Pod aspect ratio	3.34	3.31	0.42	0.08	0.09	0.27	1.66	1.66	0.09	0.09
荚平面面积	6.55	6.32	0.15	1.82	2.51	0.01^*	7.69	7.69	0.21	0.25
Pod plane area/cm²
弯曲夹角Bending angle/(°)	170.57	169.48	0.25	49.84	87.02	<0.01^**	48.34	48.34	0.04	0.06
荚绿色强度	1.10	1.13	0.21	0.03	0.04	<0.01^**	0.95	0.95	0.14	0.17
Pod green intensity
始花期Anthesis	39.85	40.29	0.41	17.81	26.81	<0.01^**	20.50	20.50	0.11	0.13
鼓粒期Filling stage	78.54	79.65	0.26	60.66	91.25	<0.01^**	43.00	43.00	0.10	0.12
生殖生长期	38.70	39.36	0.31	28.81	40.34	0.01^*	34.00	34.00	0.14	0.16
Reproductive stage
叶长Leaf length/mm	136.24	140.02	0.27	676.80	1 106.78	<0.01^**	221.05	221.05	0.19	0.24
叶宽Leaf width/mm	77.00	76.28	0.65	147.48	236.04	<0.01^**	84.62	84.62	0.16	0.20
叶长宽比Leaf aspect ratio	1.80	1.89	0.08	0.15	0.25	<0.01^**	2.61	2.61	0.22	0.27
叶面积Leaf area/cm²	72.42	74.78	0.46	574.23	1 000.1	<0.01^**	181.92	181.92	0.33	0.42

Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 17

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	QI Jianli, ZHANG Rong, WU Wenjun, JIANG Chengying, ZHAO Mengjiong, JIN Gaoming, CHEN Weiqing. Analysis and evaluation of phenotypic character diversity of olive germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1001-1015.
[2]	TAN Shuxia, ZHAO Taodi, YANG Hao, NING Kejun, LIU Li, HE Qingyuan, HUANG Shoucheng, SHU Yingjie. Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 729-735.
[3]	ZHAO Yunyan, SUN Jian, LIANG Junchao, WANG Zhiqi, YAN Tingxian, YAN Xiaowen, WEI Wenliang, LE Meiwang. Effects of low temperature on seedling growth at sesame early seedling period and screening of low-temperature tolerant materials [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 752-768.
[4]	ZHU Li, XUE Xinru, LIANG Zongxu, XU Linyu, YU Guofeng, TANG Yi, LI Huanxiu. Correlation between capsaicin content and agronomic traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 862-872.
[5]	DING Yi, ZHENG Xuxia, HUANG Haitao, MAO Yuxiao, ZHAO Yun. Analysis of agronomic traits and genetic diversity of four major tea populations in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 364-372.
[6]	ZHENG Fushun, WANG Xiaomin, LI Guohua, LI Honglei, LIU Peijun, HU Xinhua, FU Jinjun. Construction strategy of core collections of tomato germplasm resources in Ningxia, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1877-1888.
[7]	YANG Hailong, WANG Hui, LEI Jinchao, CAI Jinyang. Analysis and evaluation of phenotypic diversities of early indica rice germplasm resources in Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1571-1581.
[8]	PEI Yun, XU Xiuhong, LU Jinbiao, CHEN Amin, ZHANG Wanping. Genetic diversity analysis of 151 cherry tomato resources in Guizhou Province [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 310-316.
[9]	MO Yanling, ZHANG Wenjing, LUO Yalan, ZENG Jing, CHEN Jingjing, LIU Yihua. Identification and evaluation of agronomic traits and nutritional quality traits in wide handle mustard germplam resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 317-328.
[10]	LIU Na, FAN Qiaochu, ZHOU Jia, SONG Yajing, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, BO Yuanpeng, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming. Identification and control of anthracnose in vegetable soybean [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2682-2688.
[11]	WANG Baogen, DONG Junyang, WANG Ying, LI Sujuan, WANG Jian, LU Zhongfu, WU Xiaohua, LI Guojing, WU Xinyi. Evaluation and genetic diversity analysis of common bean germplasm in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2416-2427.
[12]	SHU Zaifa, LIU Yu, SHAO Jingna, ZHENG Shenghong, ZHOU Huijuan, JI Qingyong, HE Weizhong. Analysis of main quality components and selection of excellent resources of early-sprouting tea germplasm resources in southern Zhejiang, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2438-2450.
[13]	HE Qinghai, LIU Bentong, ZHOU Zhengde, FANG Ru, YANG Shaozong. Diversity of Rubus chingii germplasm resources based on twig and leaf phenotypic traits [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1660-1667.
[14]	ZHANG Jingzhen, WANG Lianjun, LEI Jian, CHAI Shasha, YANG Xinsun, ZHANG Wenying. Genetic diversity analysis and construction of DNA fingerprint of yam (Dioscorea oppositeac Thunb.) germplasm by cpSSR marker [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1222-1233.
[15]	ZHAI Xiuming, LI Jie, TANG Min, HU Fangjie, ZHANG Jun, HOU Yujia, XU Ze. Diversity analysis of 30 tea (Camelia sinensis) germplasm resources in Chongqing based on agronomic traits and biochemical components [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1244-1255.