Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.01

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 729-735.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.01

• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties

TAN Shuxia¹^,²(), ZHAO Taodi¹, YANG Hao¹, NING Kejun¹, LIU Li¹, HE Qingyuan¹, HUANG Shoucheng¹, SHU Yingjie¹^,^*()

1. College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui, China
2. Bureau of Rural Revitalization of Shitai County, Shitai 245100, Anhui, China

Received:2022-02-13 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-05-05

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to screen out suitable vegetable soybean varieties for intercropping with high stem crops, 10 vegetable soybean varieties were selected as test materials. The effects of 50% shading at either four leaf stage or early flowering stage on agronomic characters, yield and root nitrate nitrogen ( $NO 3 -$ -N) content and nitrate reductase (NR) activity were explored. Besides, the shade tolerance of 10 vegetable soybean varieties were determined via comprehensive membership function method. The results showed that, the plant height, pod setting height, branch height and root $NO 3 -$ -N content of some vegetable soybean varieties were significantly (P<0.05) increased, yet the yield and NR activity were significantly decreased under 50% shading. Based on the constructed comprehensive membership function value, it was found that Huaixian17-08, Kaixian No. 3, Huaixiandou No. 5 and Cuilyuyu had stronger shade tolerance, and were suitable for intercropping with high stem crops.

Key words: vegetable soybean, shade tolerance, agronomic traits, yield, nitrogen metabolism

CLC Number:

S565.1

TAN Shuxia, ZHAO Taodi, YANG Hao, NING Kejun, LIU Li, HE Qingyuan, HUANG Shoucheng, SHU Yingjie. Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 729-735.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1 Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of vegetable soybean variaties

品种 Varieties	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	主茎节数 Node number of main stem	结荚高度 Pod setting height/cm	分枝高度 Branch height/cm
翠绿玉	CK	39.20±1.42 b	7.30±0.28 a	7.11±1.29 b	6.10±0.48 a
Cuilyuyu	V	47.30±1.27 a	6.90±0.14 a	8.71±0.44 a	6.89±1.29 a
	R	45.10±3.82 a	7.10±0.14 a	8.10±0.27 a	6.31±0.01 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	48.10±2.12 b	7.90±0.14 a	7.46±1.07 c	5.62±2.29 b
Huaixiandou No. 5	V	61.70±7.50 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.50±2.18 a	7.38±0.96 a
	R	49.00±4.53 b	7.80±0.28 a	8.59±0.01 b	5.61±0.66 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	42.80±0.85 b	6.80±0.00 a	5.81±2.11 b	4.13±1.57 a
Huaixian17-08	V	52.80±5.37 a	6.30±0.14 a	7.26±1.07 a	4.81±0.27 a
	R	45.80±4.53 ab	6.45±0.64 a	6.97±0.86 a	4.50±0.79 a
辽鲜1号	CK	40.40±1.41 a	6.85±0.35 a	5.79±0.44 b	4.84±0.74 b
Liaoxian No. 1	V	48.90±2.12 a	6.60±0.57 a	8.71±2.67 a	6.15±3.38 a
	R	48.60±0.28 a	6.80±0.85 a	8.31±1.82 a	5.91±1.63 ab
沪宁95-1	CK	44.60±5.37 b	7.50±0.14 a	6.83±2.73 b	5.35±1.97 b
Huning95-1	V	53.90±1.27 a	7.30±0.14 a	8.53±1.51 a	7.07±0.89 a
	R	50.20±3.96 ab	7.25±0.07 a	8.33±2.36 a	6.97±0.27 a
绿宝石	CK	70.80±2.26 b	9.70±0.71 a	8.07±1.32 b	6.44±0.76 b
Lyubaoshi	V	85.20±8.77 a	9.50±0.71 a	11.01±1.74 a	8.59±1.48 a
	R	71.50±2.97 b	9.60±0.85 a	8.56±0.48 b	7.69±0.78 a
开鲜3号	CK	40.50±0.99 b	7.00±0.85 a	7.36±1.61 a	5.09±1.34 a
Kaixian No. 3	V	47.40±1.98 a	6.60±0.00 a	7.91±0.04 a	5.51±0.16 a
	R	44.00±4.24 ab	6.80±1.13 a	7.52±0.03 a	5.36±0.88 a
日本青	CK	43.40±6.22 b	8.00±0.28 a	6.54±1.50 b	4.89±0.95 b
Ribenqing	V	53.80±5.09 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.12±0.99 a	8.34±1.36 a
	R	49.40±1.41 ab	7.90±0.42 a	6.88±0.31 b	7.88±1.36 a
SP-16	CK	101.00±3.11 b	12.10±0.14 a	9.54±0.45 b	10.25±2.14 c
	V	135.80±1.70 a	11.80±1.41 a	10.71±3.15 a	16.51±5.98 a
	R	129.10±5.23 a	12.00±0.28 a	10.09±3.58 ab	12.11±0.69 b
台湾292	CK	48.60±7.35 b	9.00±0.57 a	7.62±2.21 c	6.89±0.95 b
Taiwan292	V	63.80±0.28 a	8.20±0.00 a	10.67±0.18 a	9.52±0.13 a
	R	60.70±6.36 a	8.80±0.28 a	9.33±1.77 b	9.34±1.02 a

Table 1 Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of vegetable soybean variaties

品种 Varieties	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	主茎节数 Node number of main stem	结荚高度 Pod setting height/cm	分枝高度 Branch height/cm
翠绿玉	CK	39.20±1.42 b	7.30±0.28 a	7.11±1.29 b	6.10±0.48 a
Cuilyuyu	V	47.30±1.27 a	6.90±0.14 a	8.71±0.44 a	6.89±1.29 a
	R	45.10±3.82 a	7.10±0.14 a	8.10±0.27 a	6.31±0.01 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	48.10±2.12 b	7.90±0.14 a	7.46±1.07 c	5.62±2.29 b
Huaixiandou No. 5	V	61.70±7.50 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.50±2.18 a	7.38±0.96 a
	R	49.00±4.53 b	7.80±0.28 a	8.59±0.01 b	5.61±0.66 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	42.80±0.85 b	6.80±0.00 a	5.81±2.11 b	4.13±1.57 a
Huaixian17-08	V	52.80±5.37 a	6.30±0.14 a	7.26±1.07 a	4.81±0.27 a
	R	45.80±4.53 ab	6.45±0.64 a	6.97±0.86 a	4.50±0.79 a
辽鲜1号	CK	40.40±1.41 a	6.85±0.35 a	5.79±0.44 b	4.84±0.74 b
Liaoxian No. 1	V	48.90±2.12 a	6.60±0.57 a	8.71±2.67 a	6.15±3.38 a
	R	48.60±0.28 a	6.80±0.85 a	8.31±1.82 a	5.91±1.63 ab
沪宁95-1	CK	44.60±5.37 b	7.50±0.14 a	6.83±2.73 b	5.35±1.97 b
Huning95-1	V	53.90±1.27 a	7.30±0.14 a	8.53±1.51 a	7.07±0.89 a
	R	50.20±3.96 ab	7.25±0.07 a	8.33±2.36 a	6.97±0.27 a
绿宝石	CK	70.80±2.26 b	9.70±0.71 a	8.07±1.32 b	6.44±0.76 b
Lyubaoshi	V	85.20±8.77 a	9.50±0.71 a	11.01±1.74 a	8.59±1.48 a
	R	71.50±2.97 b	9.60±0.85 a	8.56±0.48 b	7.69±0.78 a
开鲜3号	CK	40.50±0.99 b	7.00±0.85 a	7.36±1.61 a	5.09±1.34 a
Kaixian No. 3	V	47.40±1.98 a	6.60±0.00 a	7.91±0.04 a	5.51±0.16 a
	R	44.00±4.24 ab	6.80±1.13 a	7.52±0.03 a	5.36±0.88 a
日本青	CK	43.40±6.22 b	8.00±0.28 a	6.54±1.50 b	4.89±0.95 b
Ribenqing	V	53.80±5.09 a	7.70±0.14 a	9.12±0.99 a	8.34±1.36 a
	R	49.40±1.41 ab	7.90±0.42 a	6.88±0.31 b	7.88±1.36 a
SP-16	CK	101.00±3.11 b	12.10±0.14 a	9.54±0.45 b	10.25±2.14 c
	V	135.80±1.70 a	11.80±1.41 a	10.71±3.15 a	16.51±5.98 a
	R	129.10±5.23 a	12.00±0.28 a	10.09±3.58 ab	12.11±0.69 b
台湾292	CK	48.60±7.35 b	9.00±0.57 a	7.62±2.21 c	6.89±0.95 b
Taiwan292	V	63.80±0.28 a	8.20±0.00 a	10.67±0.18 a	9.52±0.13 a
	R	60.70±6.36 a	8.80±0.28 a	9.33±1.77 b	9.34±1.02 a

Table 2 Effect of different treatments on yield traits of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	单株荚数 Pods per plant	单株鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plant/g	有效荚数 Number of effective pods	单株粒数 Number of seeds per plant	百粒鲜重 Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	小区鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plot/kg
翠绿玉	CK	12.60±1.70 a	22.29±2.38 a	12.30±0.71 a	26.70±0.42 a	78.93±0.44 a	1.61±0.06 a
Cuilyuyu	V	9.60±0.85 b	16.80±1.34 b	8.80±0.85 b	18.50±2.97 b	70.90±2.14 b	1.06±0.04 c
	R	11.40±0.85 ab	20.79±0.75 a	10.80±0.28 ab	21.30±0.71 b	75.98±1.18 a	1.34±0.19 b
淮鲜豆5号	CK	17.60±1.41 a	34.25±1.63 a	17.00±1.41 a	36.40±2.83 a	92.00±1.38 a	2.49±0.04 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	10.30±0.71 b	24.39±0.56 c	8.80±0.28 c	18.50±0.14 c	86.72±0.21 b	1.20±0.01 c
	R	15.60±0.01 a	28.48±1.74 b	14.00±0.85 b	28.10±0.99 b	91.93±3.85 a	1.69±0.08 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	14.40±1.41 a	26.84±0.90 a	13.20±1.41 a	24.70±1.56 a	90.36±0.51 a	1.69±0.03 a
Huaixian17-08	V	11.20±0.28 b	25.78±0.68 a	10.40±0.28 b	19.00±1.13 b	71.68±0.53 b	1.12±0.06 b
	R	11.30±0.49 b	25.90±1.38 a	10.60±0.28 ab	19.30±0.99 b	89.18±0.83 a	1.27±0.10 b
辽鲜1号	CK	18.30±0.99 a	35.30±2.71 a	17.70±0.99 a	36.30±3.25 a	80.82±3.26 a	1.97±0.20 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	12.80±1.41 b	24.15±1.73 b	12.20±0.85 b	23.50±2.12 b	68.17±2.14 b	1.23±0.02 c
	R	13.20±0.92 b	24.95±2.00 b	12.40±0.78 b	23.80±2.26 b	78.77±0.41 a	1.55±0.01 b
沪宁95-1	CK	18.30±1.84 a	28.69±1.09 a	16.20±2.55 a	30.60±2.26 a	90.79±0.09 a	2.28±0.08 a
Huning95-1	V	14.40±1.70 b	22.51±0.36 b	10.70±0.99 b	18.90±1.27 b	78.32±2.57 b	1.07±0.17 c
	R	14.60±0.28 b	25.12±0.03 ab	14.10±0.42 a	21.80±0.28 b	88.77±1.70 a	1.45±0.13 b
绿宝石	CK	22.10±0.42 a	50.14±2.45 a	21.10±1.27 a	46.20±1.70 a	78.42±3.98 a	2.47±0.10 a
Lyubaoshi	V	18.10±0.42 b	37.90±1.00 b	18.10±0.42 b	37.30±0.71 c	62.90±0.63 b	1.13±0.14 b
	R	18.80±0.57 b	36.55±4.16 b	18.30±2.12 b	38.10±2.12 b	77.34±3.10 a	1.17±0.03 b
开鲜3号	CK	18.40±3.11 a	32.71±2.00 a	17.10±0.42 a	36.70±1.56 a	85.80±0.97 a	1.78±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	12.80±0.28 b	24.50±0.84 b	11.40±1.98 b	21.10±1.56 b	72.86±0.64 b	1.14±0.02 c
	R	14.60±1.41 b	25.78±2.90 b	12.90±1.27 b	26.60±0.85 b	83.43±0.67 a	1.44±0.07 b
日本青	CK	18.90±0.71 a	31.69±2.10 a	18.10±1.27 a	33.50±0.99 a	87.47±1.82 a	1.81±0.05 a
Ribenqing	V	11.70±0.42 b	20.16±1.65 c	10.30±1.27 c	19.40±5.66 b	81.57±1.18 b	1.18±0.09 b
	R	16.30±2.40 a	27.15±3.61 b	14.00±2.55 b	22.40±3.39 b	85.85±1.01 a	1.27±0.02 b
SP-16	CK	33.50±1.84 a	90.59±2.25 a	29.00±2.26 a	62.20±0.57 a	93.74±3.42 a	3.41±0.27 a
	V	12.80±1.13 c	17.84±0.62 c	9.00±0.57 c	17.10±1.84 c	71.82±1.31 b	0.69±0.01 c
	R	15.90±2.12 b	33.24±0.31 b	13.20±2.55 b	25.90±5.52 b	88.09±0.80 a	1.64±0.10 b
台湾292	CK	17.40±0.28 a	27.05±1.47 a	14.60±0.85 a	24.60±0.28 a	90.03±0.20 a	1.98±0.04 a
Taiwan292	V	10.40±0.57 c	21.94±0.60 b	8.50±0.14 b	18.10±0.42 b	80.59±0.82 b	1.10±0.02 c
	R	13.90±0.42 b	25.71±1.51 ab	12.10±0.99 a	21.80±0.57 ab	90.42±2.97 a	1.53±0.14 b

Table 2 Effect of different treatments on yield traits of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	单株荚数 Pods per plant	单株鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plant/g	有效荚数 Number of effective pods	单株粒数 Number of seeds per plant	百粒鲜重 Fresh weight of 100 grains/g	小区鲜荚重 Fresh pod weight per plot/kg
翠绿玉	CK	12.60±1.70 a	22.29±2.38 a	12.30±0.71 a	26.70±0.42 a	78.93±0.44 a	1.61±0.06 a
Cuilyuyu	V	9.60±0.85 b	16.80±1.34 b	8.80±0.85 b	18.50±2.97 b	70.90±2.14 b	1.06±0.04 c
	R	11.40±0.85 ab	20.79±0.75 a	10.80±0.28 ab	21.30±0.71 b	75.98±1.18 a	1.34±0.19 b
淮鲜豆5号	CK	17.60±1.41 a	34.25±1.63 a	17.00±1.41 a	36.40±2.83 a	92.00±1.38 a	2.49±0.04 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	10.30±0.71 b	24.39±0.56 c	8.80±0.28 c	18.50±0.14 c	86.72±0.21 b	1.20±0.01 c
	R	15.60±0.01 a	28.48±1.74 b	14.00±0.85 b	28.10±0.99 b	91.93±3.85 a	1.69±0.08 b
淮鲜17-08	CK	14.40±1.41 a	26.84±0.90 a	13.20±1.41 a	24.70±1.56 a	90.36±0.51 a	1.69±0.03 a
Huaixian17-08	V	11.20±0.28 b	25.78±0.68 a	10.40±0.28 b	19.00±1.13 b	71.68±0.53 b	1.12±0.06 b
	R	11.30±0.49 b	25.90±1.38 a	10.60±0.28 ab	19.30±0.99 b	89.18±0.83 a	1.27±0.10 b
辽鲜1号	CK	18.30±0.99 a	35.30±2.71 a	17.70±0.99 a	36.30±3.25 a	80.82±3.26 a	1.97±0.20 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	12.80±1.41 b	24.15±1.73 b	12.20±0.85 b	23.50±2.12 b	68.17±2.14 b	1.23±0.02 c
	R	13.20±0.92 b	24.95±2.00 b	12.40±0.78 b	23.80±2.26 b	78.77±0.41 a	1.55±0.01 b
沪宁95-1	CK	18.30±1.84 a	28.69±1.09 a	16.20±2.55 a	30.60±2.26 a	90.79±0.09 a	2.28±0.08 a
Huning95-1	V	14.40±1.70 b	22.51±0.36 b	10.70±0.99 b	18.90±1.27 b	78.32±2.57 b	1.07±0.17 c
	R	14.60±0.28 b	25.12±0.03 ab	14.10±0.42 a	21.80±0.28 b	88.77±1.70 a	1.45±0.13 b
绿宝石	CK	22.10±0.42 a	50.14±2.45 a	21.10±1.27 a	46.20±1.70 a	78.42±3.98 a	2.47±0.10 a
Lyubaoshi	V	18.10±0.42 b	37.90±1.00 b	18.10±0.42 b	37.30±0.71 c	62.90±0.63 b	1.13±0.14 b
	R	18.80±0.57 b	36.55±4.16 b	18.30±2.12 b	38.10±2.12 b	77.34±3.10 a	1.17±0.03 b
开鲜3号	CK	18.40±3.11 a	32.71±2.00 a	17.10±0.42 a	36.70±1.56 a	85.80±0.97 a	1.78±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	12.80±0.28 b	24.50±0.84 b	11.40±1.98 b	21.10±1.56 b	72.86±0.64 b	1.14±0.02 c
	R	14.60±1.41 b	25.78±2.90 b	12.90±1.27 b	26.60±0.85 b	83.43±0.67 a	1.44±0.07 b
日本青	CK	18.90±0.71 a	31.69±2.10 a	18.10±1.27 a	33.50±0.99 a	87.47±1.82 a	1.81±0.05 a
Ribenqing	V	11.70±0.42 b	20.16±1.65 c	10.30±1.27 c	19.40±5.66 b	81.57±1.18 b	1.18±0.09 b
	R	16.30±2.40 a	27.15±3.61 b	14.00±2.55 b	22.40±3.39 b	85.85±1.01 a	1.27±0.02 b
SP-16	CK	33.50±1.84 a	90.59±2.25 a	29.00±2.26 a	62.20±0.57 a	93.74±3.42 a	3.41±0.27 a
	V	12.80±1.13 c	17.84±0.62 c	9.00±0.57 c	17.10±1.84 c	71.82±1.31 b	0.69±0.01 c
	R	15.90±2.12 b	33.24±0.31 b	13.20±2.55 b	25.90±5.52 b	88.09±0.80 a	1.64±0.10 b
台湾292	CK	17.40±0.28 a	27.05±1.47 a	14.60±0.85 a	24.60±0.28 a	90.03±0.20 a	1.98±0.04 a
Taiwan292	V	10.40±0.57 c	21.94±0.60 b	8.50±0.14 b	18.10±0.42 b	80.59±0.82 b	1.10±0.02 c
	R	13.90±0.42 b	25.71±1.51 ab	12.10±0.99 a	21.80±0.57 ab	90.42±2.97 a	1.53±0.14 b

Table 3 Effects of different treatments on root nitrogen metabolism of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	硝态氮含量 $NO 3 -$ -N content/ (μg·g^-1)	硝酸还原酶活性 Nitrate reductase activity/(U·g^-1)
翠绿玉	CK	147.44±22.12 b	20.88±2.75 a
Cuilyuyu	V	152.56±1.81 b	9.67±1.53 b
	R	180.26±8.34 a	10.30±1.17 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	181.03±3.63 a	12.68±0.38 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	187.69±5.80 a	10.29±3.26 a
	R	195.38±2.18 a	12.74±1.16 a
淮鲜17-08	CK	150.51±17.77 b	11.83±0.44 a
Huaixian17-08	V	163.08±12.33 b	8.70±3.18 a
	R	186.41±2.54 a	9.32±2.43 a
辽鲜1号	CK	94.36±3.63 b	18.85±0.21 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	227.95±7.61 a	6.52±0.30 c
	R	232.31±2.18 a	14.43±0.48 b
沪宁95-1	CK	225.13±2.90 b	13.07±0.04 a
Huning95-1	V	263.08±1.45 a	3.44±0.39 b
	R	268.46±1.09 a	12.46±0.44 a
绿宝石	CK	138.21±2.54 b	9.27±1.47 a
Lyubaoshi	V	237.44±1.09 a	3.04±0.78 b
	R	240.77±5.08 a	4.22±1.64 b
开鲜3号	CK	134.62±6.16 c	12.84±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	157.44±2.18 b	7.57±1.50 b
	R	219.23±14.87 a	11.58±0.18 a
日本青	CK	152.05±11.97 b	12.90±1.29 a
Ribenqing	V	157.18±13.42 b	11.81±1.06 a
	R	221.28±5.44 a	11.80±0.97 a
SP-16	CK	162.31±9.07 c	10.92±2.44 a
	V	230.77±3.63 b	6.88±1.09 b
	R	333.08±36.62 a	9.99±2.43 ab
台湾292	CK	97.95±2.18 c	15.80±1.17 a
Taiwan292	V	173.59±1.09 b	11.42±2.79 b
	R	265.13±1.45 a	10.28±0.21 b

Table 3 Effects of different treatments on root nitrogen metabolism of vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	硝态氮含量 $NO 3 -$ -N content/ (μg·g^-1)	硝酸还原酶活性 Nitrate reductase activity/(U·g^-1)
翠绿玉	CK	147.44±22.12 b	20.88±2.75 a
Cuilyuyu	V	152.56±1.81 b	9.67±1.53 b
	R	180.26±8.34 a	10.30±1.17 a
淮鲜豆5号	CK	181.03±3.63 a	12.68±0.38 a
Huaixiandou No.5	V	187.69±5.80 a	10.29±3.26 a
	R	195.38±2.18 a	12.74±1.16 a
淮鲜17-08	CK	150.51±17.77 b	11.83±0.44 a
Huaixian17-08	V	163.08±12.33 b	8.70±3.18 a
	R	186.41±2.54 a	9.32±2.43 a
辽鲜1号	CK	94.36±3.63 b	18.85±0.21 a
Liaoxian No.1	V	227.95±7.61 a	6.52±0.30 c
	R	232.31±2.18 a	14.43±0.48 b
沪宁95-1	CK	225.13±2.90 b	13.07±0.04 a
Huning95-1	V	263.08±1.45 a	3.44±0.39 b
	R	268.46±1.09 a	12.46±0.44 a
绿宝石	CK	138.21±2.54 b	9.27±1.47 a
Lyubaoshi	V	237.44±1.09 a	3.04±0.78 b
	R	240.77±5.08 a	4.22±1.64 b
开鲜3号	CK	134.62±6.16 c	12.84±0.10 a
Kaixian No.3	V	157.44±2.18 b	7.57±1.50 b
	R	219.23±14.87 a	11.58±0.18 a
日本青	CK	152.05±11.97 b	12.90±1.29 a
Ribenqing	V	157.18±13.42 b	11.81±1.06 a
	R	221.28±5.44 a	11.80±0.97 a
SP-16	CK	162.31±9.07 c	10.92±2.44 a
	V	230.77±3.63 b	6.88±1.09 b
	R	333.08±36.62 a	9.99±2.43 ab
台湾292	CK	97.95±2.18 c	15.80±1.17 a
Taiwan292	V	173.59±1.09 b	11.42±2.79 b
	R	265.13±1.45 a	10.28±0.21 b

Table 4 Comprehensive membership function values of ten vegetable soybean varieties

品种 Variety	R₁	R₂	R₃	R₄	R₅	R₆	R₇	R₈	R₉	R₁₀	R₁₁	R₁₂	R	排名 Rank
淮鲜17-08 Huaixian17-08	0.99	0.74	0.60	0.95	0.96	0.94	1.00	0.99	0.98	1.00	0.89	0.82	10.85	1
开鲜3号 Kaixian No. 3	1.00	0.86	1.00	1.00	0.89	0.85	0.90	0.84	0.77	0.96	0.66	0.78	10.50	2
淮鲜豆5号 Huaixiandou No. 5	0.96	1.00	0.48	0.86	1.00	0.85	0.89	0.80	0.77	0.65	1.00	0.99	10.25	3
翠绿玉 Cuilyuyu	0.97	0.86	0.60	0.96	0.87	1.00	0.96	1.00	0.94	1.00	0.93	0.00	10.10	4
日本青 Ribenqing	0.92	0.95	0.53	0.23	0.72	0.84	0.89	0.78	0.78	0.91	0.79	1.00	9.33	5
沪宁95-1 Huning95-1	0.95	0.93	0.47	0.64	0.36	0.90	0.94	0.92	0.84	0.67	0.76	0.59	8.98	6
绿宝石 Lyubaoshi	0.95	1.00	0.43	0.64	0.58	0.91	0.81	0.97	0.89	0.51	0.28	0.54	8.50	7
辽鲜1号 Liaoxian No. 1	0.91	1.00	0.00	0.77	0.92	0.81	0.85	0.94	0.78	0.91	0.00	0.26	8.15	8
台湾292 Taiwan292	0.70	0.67	0.14	0.41	0.75	0.82	0.97	0.88	1.00	0.86	0.11	0.61	7.92	9
SP-16	0	0	0.79	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.13	0.86	1.78	10

References 16

[1]	盖钧镒, 王明军, 陈长之. 中国毛豆生产的历史渊源与发展[J]. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(1): 7-13.
	GAI J Y, WANG M J, CHEN C Z. Historical origin and development of vegetable soybean production in China[J]. Soybean Science, 2002, 21(1): 7-13. (in Chinese)
[2]	王竹, 杨文钰, 伍晓燕, 等. 玉米株型和幅宽对套作大豆初花期形态建成及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(2): 323-329.
	WANG Z, YANG W Y, WU X Y, et al. Effects of maize plant type and planting width on the early morphological characters and yield of relayplanted soybean[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(2): 323-329. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	YAO X D, ZHOU H L, ZHU Q, et al. Photosynthetic response of soybean leaf to wide light-fluctuation in maize-soybean intercropping system[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1695. DOI PMID
[4]	LIU W G, ZOU J L, ZHANG J, et al. Evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) stem vining in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system[J]. Plant Production Science, 2015, 18(1): 69-75. DOI URL
[5]	王一, 杨文钰, 张霞, 等. 不同生育时期遮阴对大豆形态性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10): 1871-1879. DOI
	WANG Y, YANG W Y, ZHANG X, et al. Effects of shading at different growth stages on different traits and yield of soybean[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(10): 1871-1879. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
[6]	于晓波, 张明荣, 吴海英, 等. 净套作下不同耐荫性大豆品种农艺性状及产量分布的研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(5): 757-761.
	YU X B, ZHANG M R, WU H Y, et al. Agronomic characters and yield distribution of different shade tolerance soybean under monoculture and relay strip intercropping systems[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(5): 757-761. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	龚万灼, 吴雨珊, 雍太文, 等. 玉米-大豆带状套作中荫蔽及光照恢复对大豆生长特性与产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2015, 37(4): 475-480.
	GONG W Z, WU Y S, YONG T W, et al. Effects of shade and lighting recovery on growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2015, 37(4): 475-480. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	吴其林, 王竹, 杨文钰. 苗期遮荫对大豆茎秆形态和物质积累的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2007, 26(6): 868-872.
	WU Q L, WANG Z, YANG W Y. Seedling shading affects morphogenesis and substance accumulation of stem in soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2007, 26(6): 868-872. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	梁镇林. 耐阴与不耐阴大豆茎叶性状的变异及差异比较研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2000, 19(1): 35-41.
	LIANG Z L. Studies on variation and difference of characters of stem and leaf between shade-enduring and shade-non-enduring soybeans[J]. Soybean Science, 2000, 19(1): 35-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	陈怀珠, 孙祖东, 杨守臻, 等. 荫蔽对大豆主要性状的影响及大豆耐荫性鉴定方法研究初报[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2003, 25(4): 78-82.
	CHEN H Z, SUN Z D, YANG S Z, et al. Effect of shading on major characters of soybean and preliminary study on the identification method of soybean shade endurance[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scieves, 2003, 25(4): 78-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	邱丽娟, 常汝镇. 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[12]	李初英, 孙祖东, 陈怀珠, 等. 不同遮光胁迫对大豆产量性状及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2006, 25(3): 294-298.
	LI C Y, SUN Z D, CHEN H Z, et al. Study of the influence of shading strss to yield and yield characters of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2006, 25(3): 294-298. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	吴雨珊, 龚万灼, 廖敦平, 等. 带状套作荫蔽及复光对不同大豆品种(系)生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1740-1747. DOI
	WU Y S, GONG W Z, LIAO D P, et al. Effects of shade and light recovery on soybean cultivars(lines) and its relationship with yield in relay strip intercropping system[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(11): 1740-1747. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[14]	黄其椿, 李初英, 赵洪涛, 等. 菜用大豆种质资源遮光胁迫下的耐阴性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(6): 2212-2217.
	HUANG Q C, LI C Y, ZHAO H T, et al. Research of shade-tolerant on vegetable soybean germplasm resources under shading stress[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 25(6): 2212-2217. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	袁刘正, 李潮海, 王秀萍, 等. 不同玉米自交系耐荫性比较[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(6): 19-23.
	YUAN L Z, LI C H, WANG X P, et al. Comparison of shade-tolerance among different maize(Zea mays L.) inbred lines[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008, 16(6): 19-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	李春红, 姚兴东, 鞠宝韬, 等. 不同基因型大豆耐荫性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939.
	LI C H, YAO X D, JU B T, et al. Analysis of shade-tolerance and determination of shade-tolerance evaluation indicators in different soybean genotypes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Effects of shading on agronomic characters, yield and nitrogen metabolism of 10 vegetable soybean varieties

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 16

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CHAI Guanqun, ZHOU Wei, LIANG Hong, FAN Feifei, ZHU Dayan, FAN Chengwu. Effect of foliar spraying of zinc fertilizer and citric acid on yield, quality and Cd absorption and transport ation of pepper [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079.
[2]	HUANG Zheng, ZHANG Rongping, MA Peng, ZHANG Qi, ZHOU Ningning, ASHEN Rigui, FENG Tingyu, ZHOU Lin. Effects of rape straw returning in winter paddy field and nitrogen fertilizer management on dry matter accumulation and yield of hybrid rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 983-991.
[3]	MA Yihu, ZENG Xiaoyuan, HE Xianbiao, ZHOU Naidi, CHEN Jian. Response of grain yield and quality of high quality rice to climate factors at different sowing dates in southeastern Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 736-751.
[4]	MA Xinchao, XUAN Zhengying, TAN Zhanming, ZHOU Yu, WANG Xufeng. Optimization of water-nitrogen coupling scheme for production effect of cucumber in sand culture in greenhouse [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 809-820.
[5]	WANG Jinfeng, ZHOU Qi, LYU Yulong, CHEN Zhuomei. Effects of intercropping tea with landscape trees on ecosystem of tea garden and tea production [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 523-533.
[6]	DING Yi, ZHENG Xuxia, HUANG Haitao, MAO Yuxiao, ZHAO Yun. Analysis of agronomic traits and genetic diversity of four major tea populations in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 364-372.
[7]	WANG Ben, LI Yuxing, LI Zhe, JIANG Fengyi, HUANG Zhenglai, FAN Yonghui, ZHANG Wenjing, MA Shangyu. Performance of trehalose treatment on yield formation and quality of post-flowering heat-stressed weak gluten wheat Shengxuan No.6 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 1-9.
[8]	LI Yonghui, LI Jie, FENG Lidan, HE Jing, ZHANG Xu, LIU Xianglin. Comparison of fruit yield, disease resistance and storage ability of Lycium bararum sprayed with different plant immune inducers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 164-174.
[9]	LI Wangxiong, ZHANG Yang, TANG Zhongqi, YU Jihua. Effects of balanced fertilization on growth, quality, mineral elements contents and yield of tomato cultivated in substrate in greenhouse [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660.
[10]	WANG Feng, LIU Haitian, YU Qiaogang, YE Jing, HE Xinhua, ZHOU Yang, MA Junwei. Dry matter and nutrients accumulation characteristics of high-yield and conventional daylily varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1669-1678.
[11]	ZOU Zhenhao, SUN Yeliang, ZHAO Yubao, LI Xin, ZHANG Liping, ZHANG Lan, DONG Chunwang, FU Jianyu, HAN Wenyan, YAN Peng. Effects of picking flower buds on yield and quality of tea in spring [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376.
[12]	ZHU Shijun, JIN Shuquan, YAO Hongyan, XU Zhihao, LUO Youjun, CHEN Ruoxia. Effects of different basal fertilizers and topdressing fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of pineapple [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226.
[13]	ZHU Ming, LIU Chen, LIN Yicheng, GUO Bin, LI Hua, FU Qinglin. Effects of conditioning agents on soil fertility, microbial community diversity and rice yield in red soil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1258-1267.
[14]	YE Ying, ZHAO Kaocheng, MA Jun, ZHU Ke, ZHUANG Hengyang. Effects of sowing date and nitrogen application rate on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of rice variety Nanjing 9108 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 879-886.
[15]	HU Kaibo, YANG Qingxia, LI Yang, WU Kaixian, ZHAO Ping, LONG Guangqiang. Effect of application of amino acid fertilizer on spring maize cultivation under nitrogen reduction [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 661-670.