Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1844-1852.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20220956
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Ning1(), TAO Ronghao1, LIU Peishi2, HU Hanxiu1, GAO Linlin3, GUO Long1, ZHU Zunyou4, MA Youhua1,*(
)
Received:
2022-06-25
Online:
2023-08-25
Published:
2023-08-29
CLC Number:
ZHANG Ning, TAO Ronghao, LIU Peishi, HU Hanxiu, GAO Linlin, GUO Long, ZHU Zunyou, MA Youhua. Effects of organic fertilizer coupled with chemical fertilizer on growth and quality of tea and soil fertility[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20220956
处理 Treatment | 肥料投入量 Fertilizer input | 养分折纯量Nutrients input | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无机肥Inorganic fertilizer | 有机肥Organic fertilizer | |||||||||
尿素 Urea | 磷酸一铵 Monoammonium phosphate | 硫酸钾 Potassium sulfate | 有机肥 Organic fertilizer | N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK | 270.0 | 334.0 | 240 | 0 | 165 | 90 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 67.2 | 152.8 | 178.6 | 1 967.7 | 49.5 | 41.2 | 89.3 | 115.5 | 48.8 | 30.7 |
T2 | 97.8 | 37.2 | 97.8 | 4 442.3 | 49.5 | 10.0 | 48.9 | 115.5 | 80.0 | 71.1 |
T3 | 107.6 | 0 | 0 | 5 274.0 | 49.5 | 0 | 0 | 115.5 | 222.0 | 123.9 |
T4 | 107.6 | 0 | 0 | 6 452.6 | 49.5 | 0 | 0 | 115.5 | 119.4 | 134.2 |
T5 | 107.6 | 0 | 7.7 | 6 638.0 | 49.5 | 0 | 3.8 | 115.5 | 132.8 | 116.2 |
T6 | 107.6 | 0 | 0 | 6 277.2 | 49.5 | 0 | 0 | 115.5 | 92.3 | 119.9 |
Table 1 Fertilizer and nutrient input of treatments kg·hm-2
处理 Treatment | 肥料投入量 Fertilizer input | 养分折纯量Nutrients input | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无机肥Inorganic fertilizer | 有机肥Organic fertilizer | |||||||||
尿素 Urea | 磷酸一铵 Monoammonium phosphate | 硫酸钾 Potassium sulfate | 有机肥 Organic fertilizer | N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK | 270.0 | 334.0 | 240 | 0 | 165 | 90 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 67.2 | 152.8 | 178.6 | 1 967.7 | 49.5 | 41.2 | 89.3 | 115.5 | 48.8 | 30.7 |
T2 | 97.8 | 37.2 | 97.8 | 4 442.3 | 49.5 | 10.0 | 48.9 | 115.5 | 80.0 | 71.1 |
T3 | 107.6 | 0 | 0 | 5 274.0 | 49.5 | 0 | 0 | 115.5 | 222.0 | 123.9 |
T4 | 107.6 | 0 | 0 | 6 452.6 | 49.5 | 0 | 0 | 115.5 | 119.4 | 134.2 |
T5 | 107.6 | 0 | 7.7 | 6 638.0 | 49.5 | 0 | 3.8 | 115.5 | 132.8 | 116.2 |
T6 | 107.6 | 0 | 0 | 6 277.2 | 49.5 | 0 | 0 | 115.5 | 92.3 | 119.9 |
Fig.1 Effect of treatments on 100-bud weight and bud density of tea Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05 in the same year.The same as below.
处理 Treatment | 外形Appearance | 汤色Infusion color | 香气Aroma | 滋味Taste | 叶底Infused leaf | 总分Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
CK | 87 | 77 | 88 | 87 | 90 | 83 | 85 | 83 | 86 | 78 | 87.20 | 81.40 |
T1 | 90 | 78 | 90 | 90 | 89 | 85 | 87 | 78 | 90 | 77 | 88.85 | 80.85 |
T2 | 88 | 76 | 86 | 90 | 90 | 80 | 84 | 81 | 89 | 77 | 87.20 | 80.00 |
T3 | 86 | 76 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 78 | 87 | 79 | 88 | 77 | 87.20 | 78.70 |
T4 | 86 | 76 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 80 | 87 | 87 | 88 | 80 | 87.30 | 82.00 |
T5 | 84 | 78 | 87 | 89 | 86 | 83 | 84 | 87 | 88 | 80 | 85.20 | 83.25 |
T6 | 89 | 77 | 87 | 88 | 88 | 80 | 86 | 85 | 89 | 80 | 87.65 | 81.55 |
Table 2 Effect of treatments on sensory evaluation of tea
处理 Treatment | 外形Appearance | 汤色Infusion color | 香气Aroma | 滋味Taste | 叶底Infused leaf | 总分Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
CK | 87 | 77 | 88 | 87 | 90 | 83 | 85 | 83 | 86 | 78 | 87.20 | 81.40 |
T1 | 90 | 78 | 90 | 90 | 89 | 85 | 87 | 78 | 90 | 77 | 88.85 | 80.85 |
T2 | 88 | 76 | 86 | 90 | 90 | 80 | 84 | 81 | 89 | 77 | 87.20 | 80.00 |
T3 | 86 | 76 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 78 | 87 | 79 | 88 | 77 | 87.20 | 78.70 |
T4 | 86 | 76 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 80 | 87 | 87 | 88 | 80 | 87.30 | 82.00 |
T5 | 84 | 78 | 87 | 89 | 86 | 83 | 84 | 87 | 88 | 80 | 85.20 | 83.25 |
T6 | 89 | 77 | 87 | 88 | 88 | 80 | 86 | 85 | 89 | 80 | 87.65 | 81.55 |
年份Year | 处理Treatment | pH | TN/(g·kg-1) | OM/(g·kg-1) | OP/(mg·kg-1) | AK/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | CK | 4.47±0.04 b | 1.21±0.08 d | 17.36±0.19 c | 17.24±0.24 c | 125.00±5.00 d |
T1 | 4.79±0.17 a | 1.24±0.14 d | 22.23±3.04 b | 17.54±0.75 c | 143.00±3.00 c | |
T2 | 4.77±0.14 a | 2.43±0.12 a | 26.63±1.08 a | 34.27±1.79 a | 201.00±8.54 a | |
T3 | 4.78±0.07 a | 2.39±0.01 ab | 25.93±0.73 a | 32.65±0.44 a | 143.33±6.03 c | |
T4 | 4.87±0.14 a | 2.31±0.02 abc | 18.81±1.33 c | 25.04±0.97 b | 133.33±7.51 cd | |
T5 | 4.82±0.14 a | 2.16±0.03 c | 20.39±1.59 bc | 13.79±0.25 d | 165.00±5.57 b | |
T6 | 4.48±0.12 b | 2.25±0.04 bc | 25.94±2.29 a | 17.03±1.61 c | 126.00±3.61 d | |
2020 | CK | 4.41±0.04 b | 2.15±0.03 bc | 24.85±0.57 e | 22.69±1.06 d | 151.67±1.53 e |
T1 | 4.75±0.12 a | 2.22±0.03 abc | 31.65±2.85 cd | 23.54±1.20 d | 178.33±7.64 cd | |
T2 | 4.81±0.10 a | 2.61±0.04 ab | 42.58±3.43 a | 37.97±1.64 a | 191.67±7.64 b | |
T3 | 4.84±0.24 a | 2.70±0.05 a | 37.36±1.56 b | 35.57±1.42 b | 190.00±8.66 b | |
T4 | 4.67±0.09 a | 2.31±0.69 abc | 34.26±1.65 bc | 26.54±0.92 c | 170.33±2.52 d | |
T5 | 4.79±0.11 a | 2.20±0.05 abc | 28.44±2.22 de | 21.70±0.65 de | 204.00±3.61 a | |
T6 | 4.45±0.07 b | 1.85±0.16 c | 38.03±1.11 b | 20.38±0.87 e | 186.67±3.51 bc |
Table 3 Effects of treatments on soil nutrients in tea garden
年份Year | 处理Treatment | pH | TN/(g·kg-1) | OM/(g·kg-1) | OP/(mg·kg-1) | AK/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | CK | 4.47±0.04 b | 1.21±0.08 d | 17.36±0.19 c | 17.24±0.24 c | 125.00±5.00 d |
T1 | 4.79±0.17 a | 1.24±0.14 d | 22.23±3.04 b | 17.54±0.75 c | 143.00±3.00 c | |
T2 | 4.77±0.14 a | 2.43±0.12 a | 26.63±1.08 a | 34.27±1.79 a | 201.00±8.54 a | |
T3 | 4.78±0.07 a | 2.39±0.01 ab | 25.93±0.73 a | 32.65±0.44 a | 143.33±6.03 c | |
T4 | 4.87±0.14 a | 2.31±0.02 abc | 18.81±1.33 c | 25.04±0.97 b | 133.33±7.51 cd | |
T5 | 4.82±0.14 a | 2.16±0.03 c | 20.39±1.59 bc | 13.79±0.25 d | 165.00±5.57 b | |
T6 | 4.48±0.12 b | 2.25±0.04 bc | 25.94±2.29 a | 17.03±1.61 c | 126.00±3.61 d | |
2020 | CK | 4.41±0.04 b | 2.15±0.03 bc | 24.85±0.57 e | 22.69±1.06 d | 151.67±1.53 e |
T1 | 4.75±0.12 a | 2.22±0.03 abc | 31.65±2.85 cd | 23.54±1.20 d | 178.33±7.64 cd | |
T2 | 4.81±0.10 a | 2.61±0.04 ab | 42.58±3.43 a | 37.97±1.64 a | 191.67±7.64 b | |
T3 | 4.84±0.24 a | 2.70±0.05 a | 37.36±1.56 b | 35.57±1.42 b | 190.00±8.66 b | |
T4 | 4.67±0.09 a | 2.31±0.69 abc | 34.26±1.65 bc | 26.54±0.92 c | 170.33±2.52 d | |
T5 | 4.79±0.11 a | 2.20±0.05 abc | 28.44±2.22 de | 21.70±0.65 de | 204.00±3.61 a | |
T6 | 4.45±0.07 b | 1.85±0.16 c | 38.03±1.11 b | 20.38±0.87 e | 186.67±3.51 bc |
年份Year | 处理Treatment | URE/(mg·g-1·d-1) | AP/(mg·g-1·d-1) | SUR/(mg·g-1·d-1) | PRO/(μg·g-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | CK | 0.06±0.01 e | 0.73±0.09 b | 5.69±0.17 c | 0.75±0.05 c |
T1 | 0.08±0.01 e | 0.89±0.04 a | 4.40±0.11 d | 0.87±0.05 ab | |
T2 | 0.17±0.01 b | 0.89±0.09 a | 6.76±0.16 b | 0.81±0.02 bc | |
T3 | 0.18±0.02 ab | 0.97±0.07 a | 7.85±0.81 a | 0.88±0.10 ab | |
T4 | 0.14±0.01 c | 0.72±0.01 b | 5.68±0.25 c | 0.92±0.04 a | |
T5 | 0.11±0.01 d | 0.72±0.02 b | 4.22±0.24 d | 0.76±0.03 c | |
T6 | 0.19±0.01 a | 0.95±0.06 a | 7.84±0.10 a | 0.76±0.04 c | |
2020 | CK | 0.18±0.02 d | 1.26±0.04 f | 8.35±0.78 cd | 1.67±0.04 cd |
T1 | 0.16±0.01 de | 1.44±0.02 e | 13.70±0.58 a | 1.57±0.41 d | |
T2 | 0.36±0.02 b | 2.11±0.06 b | 11.23±0.41 b | 2.52±0.22 a | |
T3 | 0.35±0.02 b | 2.47±0.14 a | 8.77±0.23 c | 2.23±0.19 ab | |
T4 | 0.31±0.01 c | 1.60±0.06 d | 7.65±0.14 d | 1.95±0.11 bc | |
T5 | 0.13±0.02 e | 1.51±0.11 de | 6.49±0.28 e | 1.37±0.07 d | |
T6 | 0.39±0.02 a | 1.75±0.07 c | 13.97±0.16 a | 1.98±0.07 bc |
Table 4 Effect of treatments on soil enzyme activities in tea garden
年份Year | 处理Treatment | URE/(mg·g-1·d-1) | AP/(mg·g-1·d-1) | SUR/(mg·g-1·d-1) | PRO/(μg·g-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | CK | 0.06±0.01 e | 0.73±0.09 b | 5.69±0.17 c | 0.75±0.05 c |
T1 | 0.08±0.01 e | 0.89±0.04 a | 4.40±0.11 d | 0.87±0.05 ab | |
T2 | 0.17±0.01 b | 0.89±0.09 a | 6.76±0.16 b | 0.81±0.02 bc | |
T3 | 0.18±0.02 ab | 0.97±0.07 a | 7.85±0.81 a | 0.88±0.10 ab | |
T4 | 0.14±0.01 c | 0.72±0.01 b | 5.68±0.25 c | 0.92±0.04 a | |
T5 | 0.11±0.01 d | 0.72±0.02 b | 4.22±0.24 d | 0.76±0.03 c | |
T6 | 0.19±0.01 a | 0.95±0.06 a | 7.84±0.10 a | 0.76±0.04 c | |
2020 | CK | 0.18±0.02 d | 1.26±0.04 f | 8.35±0.78 cd | 1.67±0.04 cd |
T1 | 0.16±0.01 de | 1.44±0.02 e | 13.70±0.58 a | 1.57±0.41 d | |
T2 | 0.36±0.02 b | 2.11±0.06 b | 11.23±0.41 b | 2.52±0.22 a | |
T3 | 0.35±0.02 b | 2.47±0.14 a | 8.77±0.23 c | 2.23±0.19 ab | |
T4 | 0.31±0.01 c | 1.60±0.06 d | 7.65±0.14 d | 1.95±0.11 bc | |
T5 | 0.13±0.02 e | 1.51±0.11 de | 6.49±0.28 e | 1.37±0.07 d | |
T6 | 0.39±0.02 a | 1.75±0.07 c | 13.97±0.16 a | 1.98±0.07 bc |
[1] | 江俞蓉, 刘思彤, 高静, 等. 六安瓜片拉老火“起霜”的形成机制及其对茶叶品质的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 487-495. |
JIANG Y R, LIU S T, GAO J, et al. The mechanism of frost-like powder and its effects on Lu’anguapian tea quality[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2018, 38(5): 487-495. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | HIRONO Y, NONAKA K. Effects of application of lime nitrogen and dicyandiamide on nitrous oxide emissions from green tea fields[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2014, 60(2): 276-285. |
[3] | XIE S W, FENG H X, YANG F, et al. Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality?: a pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(3): 2464-2476. |
[4] | LIU Z A, YANG J P, YANG Z C, et al. Effects of rainfall and fertilizer types on nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in surface runoff from subtropical tea fields in Zhejiang, China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2012, 93(3): 297-307. |
[5] | 尹荣秀, 王文华, 郭灿, 等. 有机肥对茶园土壤及茶叶产量与品质的影响研究进展[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2020, 47(1): 6-12. |
YIN R X, WANG W H, GUO C, et al. Research progress on the effects of organic fertilizer on tea garden soil, tea yield and quality[J]. Journal of Tea Communication, 2020, 47(1): 6-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 张昆, 孙永明, 万雅静, 等. 江西茶园有机肥化肥配施对茶叶产量品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(5): 57-61. |
ZHANG K, SUN Y M, WAN Y J, et al. Effects of combined application of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on tea yield and quality, and soil fertility in Jiangxi Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(5): 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[8] | 邱子健, 申卫收, 林先贵. 化肥减量增效技术及其农学、生态环境效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(4): 237-248. |
QIU Z J, SHEN W S, LIN X G. Chemical fertilizer reduction technology and its agronomic and ecological environment effects[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(4): 237-248. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 王金林, 闻禄, 陈平, 等. 长期不同施肥对茶园土壤pH、茶叶产量可持续性和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(8): 84-88. |
WANG J L, WEN L, CHEN P, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil pH, yield sustainability and quality of tea[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(8): 84-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 李昌娟, 杨文浩, 周碧青, 等. 生物炭基肥对酸化茶园土壤养分及茶叶产质量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(2): 387-397. |
LI C J, YANG W H, ZHOU B Q, et al. Effects of biochar-based fertilizer on soil nutrients, tea output and quality in an acidified tea field[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(2): 387-397. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 杨胜玲, 黄兴成, 李渝, 等. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻生长、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825. |
YANG S L, HUANG X C, LI Y, et al. Effects of long-term organic and inorganic fertilizer application on growth, dry matter accumulation and yield of rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1815-1825. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 赵洋, 刘振, 杨培迪, 等. 黄金茶种质资源生化成分的多样性分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2021, 37(5): 1285-1291. |
ZHAO Y, LIU Z, YANG P D, et al. Diversity analysis of biochemical components in Huangjincha (Camellia sinensis) germplasm resources[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 37(5): 1285-1291. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 于然, 李晔, 金丽华, 等. 高效液相色谱法同时测定茶叶中6种茶多酚含量[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2021, 32(5): 74-82. |
YU R, LI Y, JIN L H, et al. Simultaneous determination of 6 kinds of polyphenols in tea by HPLC[J]. China Food Additives, 2021, 32(5): 74-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 全彦涛, 李建, 张华南, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对信阳茶园土壤养分及春茶品质的影响[J]. 河南科学, 2020, 38(11): 1781-1785. |
QUAN Y T, LI J, ZHANG H N, et al. Effects of reduction of chemical fertilizer and organic manure supplement on soil nutrients in Xinyang tea gargen and the quality of spring tea[J]. Henan Science, 2020, 38(11): 1781-1785. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 杨转, 莫海珍, 郭桂义. 不同产地信阳毛尖茶中游离氨基酸指纹图谱特征分析[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2021, 48(2): 306-310. |
YANG Z, MO H Z, GUO G Y. Fingerprint analysis of free amino acids in Xinyang Maojian tea from different producing areas[J]. Journal of Tea Communication, 2021, 48(2): 306-310. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 王海利, 黄海铃, 崔燕, 等. 不同品种绿茶的酚氨值与茶滋味相关性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(16): 208-212. |
WANG H L, HUANG H L, CUI Y, et al. Correlation between the phenolic ammonia ratio and taste of different kinds of green tea[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(16): 208-212. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 王治会, 岳翠男, 李琛, 等. 江西省茶树种质化学特性多样性分析与鉴定评价[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(1): 172-179. |
WANG Z H, YUE C N, LI C, et al. Diversity analysis and evaluation of chemical characteristics of tea germplasms in Jiangxi Province[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 36(1): 172-179. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 刘术新, 丁枫华, 刘巧玲. 不同肥源有机肥对茶叶产量、品质及安全性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(12): 45-48. |
LIU S X, DING F H, LIU Q L. Effects of different organic fertilizers on yield, quality and safety of tea[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 45(12): 45-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | ANIŢEI M, SCHUHFRIED G, CHRAIF M. The influence of energy drinks and caffeine on time reaction and cognitive processes in young Romanian students[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 30: 662-670. |
[20] | 辛董董, 葛兰英, 张浩. 茶园施用豆粕发酵肥对土壤理化性质与茶叶品质的影响[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(3): 22-30. |
XIN D D, GE L Y, ZHANG H. Effect of fermented soybean meal fertilizer on physicochemical properties of tea garden soil and tea quality[J]. Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(3): 22-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 陈美丽, 唐德松, 龚淑英, 等. 绿茶滋味品质的定量分析及其相关性评价[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2014, 40(6): 670-678. |
CHEN M L, TANG D S, GONG S Y, et al. Quantitative analysis and correlation evaluation on taste quality of green tea[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2014, 40(6): 670-678. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | ABE S S, HASHI I, MASUNAGA T, et al. Soil profile alteration in a brown forest soil under high-input tea cultivation[J]. Plant Production Science, 2006, 9(4): 457-461. |
[23] | 郝小雨, 高伟, 王玉军, 等. 有机无机肥料配合施用对设施番茄产量、品质及土壤硝态氮淋失的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(3): 538-547. |
HAO X Y, GAO W, WANG Y J, et al. Effects of combined application of organic manure and chemical fertilizers on yield and quality of tomato and soil nitrate leaching loss under greenhouse condition[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(3): 538-547. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 周晓天, 刘佩诗, 常珺枫, 等. 猪粪替代化肥对茶叶产量、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(2): 413-420. |
ZHOU X T, LIU P S, CHANG J F, et al. Effects of substitution of pig manure for chemical fertilizer on yield and quality of tea and soil fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(2): 413-420. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 宁川川, 王建武, 蔡昆争. 有机肥对土壤肥力和土壤环境质量的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1): 175-181. |
NING C C, WANG J W, CAI K Z. The effects of organic fertilizers on soil fertility and soil environmental quality: a review[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25(1): 175-181. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 李倩, 王玉, 侯君合, 等. 崂山绿茶品质及其与土壤肥力关系的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(5): 1101-1104. |
LI Q, WANG Y, HOU J H, et al. Quality of Laoshan green tea and its relationship with soil fertility factor[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(5): 1101-1104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 杨会玲, 黄仁华, 陈珂, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对铯胁迫宿根高粱生长及根际土壤酶的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(4): 712-717. |
YANG H L, HUANG R H, CHEN K, et al. The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi(AMF) on growth of Sorghum haipense and rhizosphere soil enzymes activities under Cs stress[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2015, 34(4): 712-717. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 陶荣浩, 袁旭峰, 吴新德, 等. 修复肥料和紫云英对水稻吸收积累镉的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(1): 76-86. |
TAO R H, YUAN X F, WU X D, et al. Effects of repair fertilizer and milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) on cadmium uptake and accumulation in rice[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2023, 42(1): 76-86. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | LIU E K, YAN C R, MEI X R, et al. Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on soil chemical and biological properties in northwest China[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 158(3/4): 173-180. |
[30] | KAUR T, BRAR B S. Organic matter, microbial biomass and enzyme activity of soils under maize-wheat cropping system[J]. Journal of Soils and Crops, 2008, 18: 24-30. |
[31] | 付智丹, 周丽, 陈平, 等. 施氮量对玉米/大豆套作系统土壤微生物数量及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(10): 1463-1474. |
FU Z D, ZHOU L, CHEN P, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on soil microbial quantity and soil enzymes activities in maize/soybean intercropping systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(10): 1463-1474. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 于德良, 雷泽勇, 赵国军, 等. 土壤酶活性对沙地樟子松人工林衰退的响应[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(1): 97-105. |
YU D L, LEI Z Y, ZHAO G J, et al. Response of soil enzyme activity to the decline of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations on sand land[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, 38(1): 97-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 王兴龙, 朱敏, 杨帆, 等. 配施有机肥减氮对川中丘区土壤微生物量与酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3): 271-276. |
WANG X L, ZHU M, YANG F, et al. Effects of reducing nitrogen and applying organic fertilizers on soil microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activity in the hilly area of central Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(3): 271-276. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | ZHANG Bo, LIU Zeci, WANG Jie, LI Zhaozhuang, LI Lushan, HU Linli, YU Jihua. Effects of different fertilizer formulations of agricultural wastes on growth, yield and quality of cabbage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792. |
[2] | XU Yue, WU Xiaomeng, WANG Guoqing, ZOU Yunding, BI Shoudon. Analysis of relationship between number of Ricanidae in tea plantations and biochemical substances in tea leaves [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1834-1843. |
[3] | LU Lanfei, ZHAO Xueping, MA Zheng, FANG Nan, LUO Yuqin, WANG Xiaomei, YE Hui, LEI Yuan, WANG Qiang, ZHANG Changpeng. Determination of 2, 4-epibrassinolide residues in Dendrobium officinale by solid phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1896-1903. |
[4] | WANG Di, YANG Hanmei, LI Yangqian, JIA Mengting, ZOU Liang, YANG Fan. Multidimensional evaluation of “variety, quality, efficiency and application” of Tartary buckwheat and research progress of high-value utilization of active ingredients [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1960-1974. |
[5] | TIAN Yugang, WAN Sumei, LIN Jiao, CHEN Guodong, LI Hao, HU Yukai, LI Yanfang, HU Shoulin, MAO Tingyong, ZHAO Shuzhen. Effect of mulch types and irrigation amounts on photosynthetic parameters, yield and quality of cotton [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1523-1531. |
[6] | LEI Lian. Effects of regulated deficit drip irrigation under film on plant growth, yield and water use of seed-producing maize [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1542-1549. |
[7] | BAI Dingchen, ZHAO Zhifei, GONG Xue, LIU Yuan, NIU Suzhen, CHEN Zhengwu. Genome-wide association analysis of stomatal characters of cultivated local tea plants in Guizhou, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1550-1563. |
[8] | YANG Kun, HOU Guanjun, ZHAO Xiuxia, FANG Ting, WANG Lijun. Effects of aquatic animals-plants synergistic purification system on water quality and economic benefit in mandarin fish pond [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1709-1719. |
[9] | ZHU Yan, WEI Jia, XU Zilong, LIN Tianbao, YANG Sheng, LIU Yan, LYU Zhiqiang, LIU Peigang. Effects of growth promoting hormones on physiological and biochemical indexes of mulberry leaves during senescence [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1278-1285. |
[10] | BU Yuanpeng, LIU Na, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming, XU Linying. Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314. |
[11] | WU Xiaomeng, XU Yue, CHENG Honghao, CHEN Shiyan, ZHOU Xiazhi, ZOU Yunding, BI Shoudong. Spatial and quantitative relationships between Ectropis obliqua hypulina and their natural enemy of spiders in 6 tea gardens [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1349-1359. |
[12] | CHAI Guanqun, ZHOU Wei, LIANG Hong, FAN Feifei, ZHU Dayan, FAN Chengwu. Effect of foliar spraying of zinc fertilizer and citric acid on yield, quality and Cd absorption and transport ation of pepper [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079. |
[13] | DENG Meihua, GAO Na, WU Lintu, XU Huozhong, HONG Haiqing, ZHU Youwei. Lead source identification and pollution risk assessment on tea production in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1123-1131. |
[14] | XIAO Lihan, XIN Meiguo, LU Wenjing, YE Qin, ZHANG Cen, XIAO Chaogeng, CHEN Di. Effects of different storage conditions on quality of royal jelly from three pollen sources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1161-1167. |
[15] | MA Yihu, ZENG Xiaoyuan, HE Xianbiao, ZHOU Naidi, CHEN Jian. Response of grain yield and quality of high quality rice to climate factors at different sowing dates in southeastern Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 736-751. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||