Influence of phosphogypsum on composting process and quality of wine residue

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230941

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 2298-2307.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230941

• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Influence of phosphogypsum on composting process and quality of wine residue

GUO Yongchuan(), MA Yongjie, WANG Xingming, LIN Yuhong, LUO Yanxin, WANG Xinyi, ZHANG Xueyan^*()

College of Enology and Horticulture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

Received:2023-08-03 Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-10-30

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore a new way of solid waste recycling of wine residue and phosphogypsum, wine residue and corn straw were used as the substrates for composting, and different mass fractions (based on the dry weight of organic substrates) of phosphogypsum were added as the treatments, namely, 0 (G₀), 15%(G₁₅), 30% (G₃₀), 50% (G₅₀), 75% (G₇₅), and 100% (G₁₀₀), to explore the effect of phosphogypsum addition on fcomposting process and quality. The results showed that, compared with the G₀ treatment, the addition of phosphogypsum shortened the high temperature period by 4-5 d and increased the highest temperature during composting by 1.8-6.6 ℃. During the composting process, the largest decrease of the carbon/nitrogen ratio was found under the G₁₅ and G₃₀ treatments. After the composting, the bulk density, porosity, total nutrients content, heavy metal content, seed germination index of the G₁₅ and G₃₀ treatments all fitted the corresponding criteria. The composting products of all treatments were used as the substrate for cucumber cultivation. By principle component analysis, it was revealed that the highest comprehensive score was achieved under the G₃₀ treatment, which was followed by the G₁₅ treatment, while the comprehensive score of G₅₀, G₇₅, G₁₀₀ treatments was negative. In general, adding 30% phosphogypsum into wine residue and corn straw composting showed the best performance when used as the matrix, while excessive addition of phosphogypsum would cause negative effect.

Key words: phosphogypsum, wine residue, compost, matrix utilization

CLC Number:

S141.4

GUO Yongchuan, MA Yongjie, WANG Xingming, LIN Yuhong, LUO Yanxin, WANG Xinyi, ZHANG Xueyan. Influence of phosphogypsum on composting process and quality of wine residue[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2298-2307.

Figures/Tables 12

References 20

[1]	刘振东, 李贵春, 杨晓梅, 等. 我国农业废弃物资源化利用现状与发展趋势分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(26): 13068-13070.
	LIU Z D, LI G C, YANG X M, et al. Status and development trend of resource utilization ways of agricultural residues in China[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(26): 13068-13070. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	陈卫红, 石晓旭. 我国农林废弃物的应用与研究现状[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(18): 148-149.
	CHEN W H, SHI X X. Application and research status of agricultural and forestry wastes in China[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(18): 148-149. (in Chinese)
[3]	PÉREZ-LÓPEZ R, CASTILLO J, SARMIENTO A M, et al. Assessment of phosphogypsum impact on the salt-marshes of the Tinto River (SW Spain): role of natural attenuation processes[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, 62(12): 2787-2796.
[4]	王小彬, 闫湘, 李秀英, 等. 磷石膏农用的环境安全风险[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(2): 293-311.
	WANG X B, YAN X, LI X Y, et al. Environmental risks for application of phosphogysum in agricultural soils in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 293-311. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	陈雪娇, 王宇蕴, 徐智, 等. 不同磷石膏添加比例对稻壳与油枯堆肥过程的影响及基质化利用的评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(5): 1001-1008.
	CHEN X J, WANG Y Y, XU Z, et al. Effect of phosphogypsum addition on the rice husk and oil cake composting process and evaluation of its physicochemical character as a substrate[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018, 37(5): 1001-1008. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	赵兵, 王宇蕴, 陈雪娇, 等. 磷石膏和石膏对稻壳与油枯堆肥的影响及基质化利用评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(10): 2481-2488.
	ZHAO B, WANG Y Y, CHEN X J, et al. Effect of phosphogypsum and gypsum as conditioners on rice husk and oil cake composting process and evaluation of their physicochemical character as a substrate[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(10): 2481-2488. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	刘媛媛, 徐智, 陈卓君, 等. 外源添加磷石膏对堆肥碳组分及腐殖质品质的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(11): 2483-2490.
	LIU Y Y, XU Z, CHEN Z J, et al. Effects of phosphogypsum addition on carbon fractions and humus quality during composting[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018, 37(11): 2483-2490. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	冯海萍, 曲继松, 杨冬艳, 等. 接种微生物菌剂对枸杞枝条基质化发酵品质的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(5): 1457-1463.
	FENG H P, QU J S, YANG D Y, et al. Effects of inoculation microbial agent on fermentation quality of wolfberry branches for substrate production[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(5): 1457-1463. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	刘欣宇, 宋鹏, 林永锋, 等. 餐厨堆肥与泥炭配比用于黄瓜育苗基质的研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 42(1): 35-42.
	LIU X Y, SONG P, LIN Y F, et al. Research on the ratio of kitchen compost and peat for cucumber seedling medium[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 42(1): 35-42. (in Chinese)
[10]	高志. 适宜樱桃番茄栽培的基质配方筛选[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
	GAO Z. Screening of substrate formula suitable for cherry tomato cultivation[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	陈汉才, 李桂花, 廖森泰, 等. 农业废弃物无害化处理技术规范[J]. 广东农业科学, 2010, 37(8): 222.
	CHEN H C, LI G H, LIAO S T, et al. Technical specification for harmless treatment of agricultural waste[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 37(8): 222. (in Chinese)
[12]	TAYLOR M D, KREIS R, REJTÖ L. Establishing growing substrate pH with compost and limestone and the impact on pH buffering capacity[J]. HortScience, 2016, 51(9): 1153-1158.
[13]	ZAHRIM A Y, LEONG P S, AYISAH S R, et al. Composting paper and grass clippings with anaerobically treated palm oil mill effluent[J]. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 2016, 5(3): 221-230.
[14]	MOREL T L, COLIN F, GERMON J C. Methods for the evaluation of the maturity of municipal refuse compost[M]//GASSER J K R. Composting of agricultural and other wastes. London: Elsevier, 1985: 56-72.
[15]	张占彦. 磷石膏制备相变储能基体材料工艺研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2019.
	ZHANG Z Y. Study on preparation of phase change energy storage matrix materials by phosphogypsum[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	冯海萍, 曲继松, 杨志刚, 等. 氮源类型与配比对柠条粉基质化发酵品质的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(5): 171-178.
	FENG H P, QU J S, YANG Z G, et al. Effects of type and proportion of nitrogen on fermentation quality of caragana powder for substrate production[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(5): 171-178. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	李森, 罗雪梅, 涂卫国, 等. 保氮剂对水葫芦堆肥进程及氮素损失的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(4): 1197-1203.
	LI S, LUO X M, TU W G, et al. Effects of nitrogen preserving agent on composting process and nitrogen loss of Eichhornia crassipes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(4): 1197-1203. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	任丽梅, 李国学, 沈玉君, 等. 鸟粪石结晶反应在猪粪和玉米秸秆堆肥中的应用[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(7): 2165-2173.
	REN L M, LI G X, SHEN Y J, et al. Application of struvite crystallization on co-composting of swine manure and cornstalk[J]. Environmental Science, 2009, 30(7): 2165-2173. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	李帆, 钱坤, 武际, 等. 过磷酸钙用量对猪粪堆肥过程及磷形态变化的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4): 1037-1044.
	LI F, QIAN K, WU J, et al. Influence of applying calcium superphosphate on swine manure composting and phosphorus transformation[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(4): 1037-1044. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	李静, 谢正苗, 徐建明. 我国氟的土壤环境质量指标与人体健康关系的研究概况[J]. 土壤通报, 2006, 37(1): 194-199.
	LI J, XIE Z M, XU J M. Research progress in the relationship between soil environmental quality index of fluorine and human health in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 37(1): 194-199. (in Chinese with English abstract)

原材料 Raw meterial	TC/%	TN/%	TP/%	TK/%	C/N	pH	EC/(mS· cm^-1)	M/%	BD/(g· cm^-3)	Poro/%
葡萄酒渣Wine lees	42.68	2.25	0.60	1.16	18.97	6.02	1.12	52.40	0.14	75.62
玉米秸秆Maize straw	36.09	0.72	0.07	1.62	50.13	6.89	0.37	15.34	0.09	85.16
磷石膏Phosphogypsum	—	0.025	3.57	0.84	—	4.38	3.02	10.00	1.56	23.32

原材料 Raw meterial	TC/%	TN/%	TP/%	TK/%	C/N	pH	EC/(mS· cm^-1)	M/%	BD/(g· cm^-3)	Poro/%
葡萄酒渣Wine lees	42.68	2.25	0.60	1.16	18.97	6.02	1.12	52.40	0.14	75.62
玉米秸秆Maize straw	36.09	0.72	0.07	1.62	50.13	6.89	0.37	15.34	0.09	85.16
磷石膏Phosphogypsum	—	0.025	3.57	0.84	—	4.38	3.02	10.00	1.56	23.32

处理 Treatment	TC/%	TN/%	TP/%	TK/%	C/N	pH	EC/(mS· cm^-1)	M/%	BD/(g· cm^-3)	Poro/%
G₀	341.5 ±19.12	13.68 ±0.64	5.12 ±0.18	12.59 ±0.55	24.94 ±0.22	6.26 ±0.09	0.58 ±0.02	60.26 ±1.32	0.10 ±0.01	84.37 ±0.77
G₁₅	291.11 ±5.06	11.73 ±0.16	9.36 ±0.57	12.14 ±0.73	24.83 ±0.34	5.41 ±0.02	2.10 ±0.04	59.88 ±1.77	0.24 ±0.01	79.28 ±0.32
G₃₀	254.60 ±9.49	10.18 ±0.19	12.11 ±0.14	11.80 ±0.66	25.00 ±0.46	5.22 ±0.03	2.49 ±0.04	60.68 ±0.92	0.24 ±0.02	76.57 ±0.61
G₅₀	215.71 ±1.40	8.51 ±0.12	15.12 ±0.24	11.43 ±0.28	25.35 ±0.39	4.98 ±0.02	3.06 ±0.09	61.36 ±0.87	0.28 ±0.01	70.23 ±0.55
G₇₅	182.34 ±1.67	7.40 ±0.12	17.97 ±0.52	10.97 ±0.25	24.65 ±0.21	4.77 ±0.04	3.353 ±0.05	59.33 ±1.35	0.30 ±0.01	60.43 ±0.78
G₁₀₀	161.18 ±3.00	6.52 ±0.11	19.48 ±0.33	10.63 ±0.42	24.72 ±0.13	4.55 ±0.01	3.57 ±0.07	60.77 ±1.73	0.33 ±0.01	52.39 ±0.47

处理 Treatment	TC/%	TN/%	TP/%	TK/%	C/N	pH	EC/(mS· cm^-1)	M/%	BD/(g· cm^-3)	Poro/%
G₀	341.5 ±19.12	13.68 ±0.64	5.12 ±0.18	12.59 ±0.55	24.94 ±0.22	6.26 ±0.09	0.58 ±0.02	60.26 ±1.32	0.10 ±0.01	84.37 ±0.77
G₁₅	291.11 ±5.06	11.73 ±0.16	9.36 ±0.57	12.14 ±0.73	24.83 ±0.34	5.41 ±0.02	2.10 ±0.04	59.88 ±1.77	0.24 ±0.01	79.28 ±0.32
G₃₀	254.60 ±9.49	10.18 ±0.19	12.11 ±0.14	11.80 ±0.66	25.00 ±0.46	5.22 ±0.03	2.49 ±0.04	60.68 ±0.92	0.24 ±0.02	76.57 ±0.61
G₅₀	215.71 ±1.40	8.51 ±0.12	15.12 ±0.24	11.43 ±0.28	25.35 ±0.39	4.98 ±0.02	3.06 ±0.09	61.36 ±0.87	0.28 ±0.01	70.23 ±0.55
G₇₅	182.34 ±1.67	7.40 ±0.12	17.97 ±0.52	10.97 ±0.25	24.65 ±0.21	4.77 ±0.04	3.353 ±0.05	59.33 ±1.35	0.30 ±0.01	60.43 ±0.78
G₁₀₀	161.18 ±3.00	6.52 ±0.11	19.48 ±0.33	10.63 ±0.42	24.72 ±0.13	4.55 ±0.01	3.57 ±0.07	60.77 ±1.73	0.33 ±0.01	52.39 ±0.47

处理 Treatment	Cr/(mg·kg^-1)	Pb/(mg·kg^-1)	Cd/(mg·kg^-1)	As/(mg·kg^-1)	Hg/(mg·kg^-1)	F/(g·kg^-1)
G₀	6.66±0.27 e	9.87±0.24 c	0.21±0.02 a	2.81±0.28 e	0.05±0.01 e	0.84±0.02 f
G₁₅	11.45±0.36 d	11.01±0.13 b	0.27±0.04 a	4.78±0.08 d	0.07±0.01 e	1.17±0.04 e
G₃₀	12.72±0.26 cd	12.64±0.20 a	0.24±0.02 a	5.53±0.19 cd	0.08±0.01 d	1.96±0.03 d
G₅₀	13.46±0.25 bc	12.91±0.16 a	0.28±0.02 a	6.26±0.05 bc	0.13±0.01 c	2.43±0.04 c
G₇₅	14.17±0.25 ab	13.38±0.10 a	0.26±0.03 a	7.14±0.17 ab	0.16±0.01 b	2.80±0.05 b
G₁₀₀	14.82±0.27 a	13.39±0.11 a	0.30±0.01 a	7.17±0.25 a	0.18±0.01 a	3.53±0.02 a

Influence of phosphogypsum on composting process and quality of wine residue

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 20

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

处理 Treatment	出苗率 Emergence rate/%	株高 Plant height/cm	茎粗 Stem thickness/ mm	SPAD	地上部鲜重 Fresh weight of the above- ground part/g	地上部干重 Dry weight of the above- ground part/g	地下部鲜重 Fresh weight of the under- ground part/g	地下部干重 Dry weight of the under- ground part/g	壮苗指数 Strong seedling index
G₀	85.05± 1.60 bc	5.31± 0.07 b	3.34± 0.04 ab	28.20± 0.47 a	2.32± 0.04 a	0.25± 0.00 a	1.02± 0.04 a	0.06± 0.01 a	0.08± 0.01 a
G₁₅	90.08± 0.08 ab	6.00± 0.03 a	3.32± 0.10 ab	28.73± 0.24 a	2.19± 0.03 ab	0.22± 0.01 b	1.00± 0.06 a	0.06± 0.00 a	0.08± 0.01 a
G₃₀	92.89± 0.64 a	5.90± 0.05 a	3.57± 0.01 a	30.27± 0.64 a	2.08± 0.07 b	0.20± 0.00 bc	1.06± 0.02 a	0.05± 0.01 ab	0.08± 0.01 a
G₅₀	84.79± 2.16 bc	5.15± 0.10 b	3.21± 0.07 bc	28.53± 1.07 a	1.83± 0.06 c	0.21± 0.01 b	0.91± 0.08 a	0.04± 0.01 b	0.06± 0.01 b
G₇₅	83.61± 2.67 bc	5.05± 0.02 bc	3.14± 0.09 bc	28.47± 0.86 a	1.74± 0.02 c	0.17± 0.01 cd	0.90± 0.12 a	0.05± 0.01 ab	0.07± 0.01 ab
G₁₀₀	77.92± 0.30 c	4.80± 0.03 c	2.93± 0.02 c	28.60± 0.87 a	1.72± 0.01 c	0.16± 0.01 d	0.77± 0.07 a	0.04± 0.01 b	0.06± 0.01 b

[1]	YAN Zhongli, LI Yonghui, LI Yucheng, LI Wei, ZHANG Xuesheng, HONG Yong, GE Li’ao. Control effect of aerobic composting with avermectin loaded by cyanobacteria on strawberry red spiders [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2264-2272.
[2]	WU Yuke, WANG Feng, WANG Yifan, WU Xueping, ZHU Weiqin. Parameters optimization for vermicomposting of cow dung and changes of properties of composting residues [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2308-2315.
[3]	WANG Jiali, WANG Ziyu, MA Yongqi, TANG Defu, SUN Likun. Effect of nitrogen transforming flora on nitrogen retention in aerobic composting of cattle manure [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 177-186.
[4]	WANG Ke, SHAO Yeyao, ZHANG Peiyun, DU Yanchun, XU Qianglong, WANG Yanyan, RUAN Wenbin, XU Sijie, GE Jieke, YE Duo, LIU Peng, XING Chenghua. Study on composting method of green waste and its potential in replacing peat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1680-1689.
[5]	PAN Yajie, CHANG Huiqing, SONG Panpan. Nutrients characteristics of pig manure in large-scale farms and effect of filler addition during composting [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1690-1698.
[6]	XIAO Xiaolan, ZHANG Hao, FU Chuanhui, LIU Hao, RUAN Wenquan. Screening thermophiles to promote co-composting of biogas residue and black soldier fly larval frass [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 647-657.
[7]	ZHOU Wenzhi, LI Suyan, SUN Xiangyang, LI Xiaochong, ZHA Guichao, WEI Ningxian. Effects of different materials on leaching characteristics of salinity in coastal saline-alkali soil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1485-1492.
[8]	WU Yifan, XIA Jie, CHEN Sheng, ZHANG Wei, XIE Jinzhong. Study on suitable ratio for bamboo sawdust and wheat bran composting as substrate of Stropharia rugosoannulata [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 1024-1031.
[9]	ZHANG Xinpeng, WANG Xin, SUN Jian, YI Guoyun, LI Songling. Isolation and identification of a Pseudomonas strain and its application potential in rape straw composting in Qinghai, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 343-351.
[10]	YIN Zexin, ZHANG Lu, HAO Dan, BAI Yifan. Feasibility of cow dung compost substituting peat in seedling nursery of three Solanaceae plants [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1700-1709.
[11]	ZHU Shijun, JIN Shuquan, WANG Feng, HAN Yongjiang, SUN Jie. Characteristics of typical urban waste mixed aerobic composting and its effect on seedling growth [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(6): 1069-1077.
[12]	WU Chengjie, REN Lantian, HAO Bing, SHAO Qingqin, WANG Hong, CHEN Feng, DAI Gaofeng, MEI Shiyuan, ZHANG Congjun. Effect of crop residue compost replacing part of chemical fertilizer and nitrification inhibitor on greenhouse gas emission of winter wheat [J]. , 2020, 32(7): 1233-1240.
[13]	MA Qixue, SUN Xiangyang, LI Suyan, LI Song, LIU Yuanxin, ZHOU Wenjie. Effects of applying green waste compost on physiological characteristics of pakchoi in Pb, Zn contaminated soil [J]. , 2020, 32(11): 2027-2034.
[14]	BAI Ling, SONG Feiyue, JI Mengmeng, DENG Yun, RUAN Wenquan. Effects of different bulking agents on compost of straw biogas residue [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 124-133.
[15]	HUANG Jian, XIAO Jianzhong, TANG Shigang, ZHENG Qiang, DING Fenghua, ZHANG Dongxu. Effect of montmorillonite addition on aerobic composting and heavy metals passivation of pig manure [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 141-148.

处理Treatment	得分Score	排序Ranking
G₀	0.84	3
G₁₅	1.81	2
G₃₀	2.46	1
G₅₀	-0.93	4
G₇₅	-1.4	5
G₁₀₀	-2.78	6

处理Treatment	得分Score	排序Ranking
G₀	0.84	3
G₁₅	1.81	2
G₃₀	2.46	1
G₅₀	-0.93	4
G₇₅	-1.4	5
G₁₀₀	-2.78	6