Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1153-1163.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250529
• Future Foods and Health • Previous Articles Next Articles
WEI Liping1(
), WANG Yangguang1,*(
), YANG Ying1, LU Shengmin2,*(
)
Received:2025-08-11
Online:2026-06-25
Published:2026-07-14
CLC Number:
WEI Liping, WANG Yangguang, YANG Ying, LU Shengmin. Synchronous extraction, purification, and functional activity analysis of naringin and neohesperidin from dried immature Huyou (Citrus ×aurantium Changshanhuyou) fruits[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1153-1163.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250529
Fig.2 Effects of single factor levels on yield of naringin(NR) and neohesperidin(NHP) from dried immature Huyou (Citrus×aurantium Changshanhuyou) fruit NR, Naringin; NHP, Neohesperidin. Values marked without the same lowercase letter indicates significant (p<0.05) differences.
| 水平 Level | A/% | B/min | C/W | D/(g·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 20 | 5 | 250 | 1∶5 |
| 0 | 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 |
| 1 | 60 | 25 | 350 | 1∶25 |
Table 1 Factors and levels used in response surface analysis
| 水平 Level | A/% | B/min | C/W | D/(g·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 20 | 5 | 250 | 1∶5 |
| 0 | 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 |
| 1 | 60 | 25 | 350 | 1∶25 |
| A/% | B/min | C/W | D/(g·mL-1) | NR得率/(mg·g-1) NR yield/(mg·g-1) | NHP得率/(mg·g-1) NHP yield/(mg·g-1) | 总得率/(mg·g-1) Total yield/(mg·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 15 | 250 | 1∶25 | 94.08 | 74.14 | 168.22 |
| 20 | 25 | 300 | 1∶15 | 82.70 | 68.65 | 151.35 |
| 40 | 15 | 350 | 1∶25 | 104.07 | 91.99 | 196.06 |
| 40 | 5 | 300 | 1∶5 | 83.66 | 72.33 | 155.99 |
| 60 | 25 | 300 | 1∶15 | 94.49 | 80.31 | 174.80 |
| 20 | 5 | 300 | 1∶15 | 85.43 | 73.90 | 159.33 |
| 20 | 15 | 300 | 1∶5 | 89.71 | 74.59 | 164.30 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 132.79 | 98.10 | 230.89 |
| 40 | 25 | 250 | 1∶15 | 81.11 | 66.26 | 147.37 |
| 40 | 25 | 300 | 1∶25 | 91.24 | 72.87 | 164.11 |
| 40 | 5 | 300 | 1∶25 | 98.34 | 78.82 | 177.16 |
| 40 | 25 | 350 | 1∶15 | 81.96 | 73.43 | 155.39 |
| 60 | 15 | 250 | 1∶15 | 96.46 | 80.33 | 176.79 |
| 60 | 15 | 350 | 1∶15 | 110.83 | 77.21 | 188.04 |
| 40 | 5 | 350 | 1∶15 | 95.42 | 77.59 | 173.01 |
| 60 | 15 | 300 | 1∶5 | 93.46 | 68.66 | 162.12 |
| 40 | 15 | 350 | 1∶5 | 90.61 | 79.11 | 169.72 |
| 40 | 5 | 250 | 1∶15 | 83.83 | 68.49 | 152.32 |
| 20 | 15 | 350 | 1∶15 | 88.97 | 79.63 | 168.60 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 135.65 | 104.23 | 239.88 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 130.03 | 104.18 | 234.21 |
| 60 | 15 | 300 | 1∶25 | 98.87 | 88.90 | 187.77 |
| 20 | 15 | 250 | 1∶15 | 84.53 | 74.54 | 159.07 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 128.65 | 101.60 | 230.25 |
| 40 | 25 | 300 | 1∶5 | 83.93 | 74.68 | 158.61 |
| 20 | 15 | 300 | 1∶25 | 88.38 | 71.13 | 159.52 |
| 40 | 15 | 250 | 1∶5 | 89.83 | 80.01 | 169.84 |
| 60 | 5 | 300 | 1∶15 | 100.86 | 82.47 | 183.33 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 130.89 | 105.68 | 236.57 |
Table 2 Response surface test results
| A/% | B/min | C/W | D/(g·mL-1) | NR得率/(mg·g-1) NR yield/(mg·g-1) | NHP得率/(mg·g-1) NHP yield/(mg·g-1) | 总得率/(mg·g-1) Total yield/(mg·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 15 | 250 | 1∶25 | 94.08 | 74.14 | 168.22 |
| 20 | 25 | 300 | 1∶15 | 82.70 | 68.65 | 151.35 |
| 40 | 15 | 350 | 1∶25 | 104.07 | 91.99 | 196.06 |
| 40 | 5 | 300 | 1∶5 | 83.66 | 72.33 | 155.99 |
| 60 | 25 | 300 | 1∶15 | 94.49 | 80.31 | 174.80 |
| 20 | 5 | 300 | 1∶15 | 85.43 | 73.90 | 159.33 |
| 20 | 15 | 300 | 1∶5 | 89.71 | 74.59 | 164.30 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 132.79 | 98.10 | 230.89 |
| 40 | 25 | 250 | 1∶15 | 81.11 | 66.26 | 147.37 |
| 40 | 25 | 300 | 1∶25 | 91.24 | 72.87 | 164.11 |
| 40 | 5 | 300 | 1∶25 | 98.34 | 78.82 | 177.16 |
| 40 | 25 | 350 | 1∶15 | 81.96 | 73.43 | 155.39 |
| 60 | 15 | 250 | 1∶15 | 96.46 | 80.33 | 176.79 |
| 60 | 15 | 350 | 1∶15 | 110.83 | 77.21 | 188.04 |
| 40 | 5 | 350 | 1∶15 | 95.42 | 77.59 | 173.01 |
| 60 | 15 | 300 | 1∶5 | 93.46 | 68.66 | 162.12 |
| 40 | 15 | 350 | 1∶5 | 90.61 | 79.11 | 169.72 |
| 40 | 5 | 250 | 1∶15 | 83.83 | 68.49 | 152.32 |
| 20 | 15 | 350 | 1∶15 | 88.97 | 79.63 | 168.60 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 135.65 | 104.23 | 239.88 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 130.03 | 104.18 | 234.21 |
| 60 | 15 | 300 | 1∶25 | 98.87 | 88.90 | 187.77 |
| 20 | 15 | 250 | 1∶15 | 84.53 | 74.54 | 159.07 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 128.65 | 101.60 | 230.25 |
| 40 | 25 | 300 | 1∶5 | 83.93 | 74.68 | 158.61 |
| 20 | 15 | 300 | 1∶25 | 88.38 | 71.13 | 159.52 |
| 40 | 15 | 250 | 1∶5 | 89.83 | 80.01 | 169.84 |
| 60 | 5 | 300 | 1∶15 | 100.86 | 82.47 | 183.33 |
| 40 | 15 | 300 | 1∶15 | 130.89 | 105.68 | 236.57 |
| 方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 21 700.21 | 14 | 1 550.02 | 45.43 | <0.000 1 |
| A | 1 020.84 | 1 | 1 020.84 | 29.92 | <0.000 1 |
| B | 204.27 | 1 | 204.27 | 5.99 | 0.028 2 |
| C | 496.78 | 1 | 496.78 | 14.56 | 0.001 9 |
| D | 435.13 | 1 | 435.13 | 12.75 | 0.003 1 |
| AB | 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 | 2.22×10-3 | 0.963 1 |
| AC | 0.74 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.02 | 0.885 0 |
| AD | 231.50 | 1 | 231.50 | 6.78 | 0.020 8 |
| BC | 40.13 | 1 | 40.13 | 1.18 | 0.296 4 |
| BD | 61.39 | 1 | 61.39 | 1.80 | 0.201 2 |
| CD | 195.44 | 1 | 195.44 | 5.73 | 0.031 3 |
| A2 | 6 002.44 | 1 | 6 002.44 | 175.92 | <0.000 1 |
| B2 | 10 745.46 | 1 | 10 745.46 | 314.94 | <0.000 1 |
| C2 | 6 536.21 | 1 | 6 536.21 | 191.57 | <0.000 1 |
| D2 | 6 081.63 | 1 | 6 081.63 | 178.25 | <0.000 1 |
| 残差Residual | 477.67 | 14 | 34.12 | — | — |
| 失拟项Lack of fit | 413.36 | 10 | 41.34 | 2.57 | 0.188 0 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 64.31 | 4 | 16.08 | — | — |
| 总回归Total regression | 22 177.88 | 28 | — | — | — |
Table 3 Analysis of variance for the regression model
| 方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 21 700.21 | 14 | 1 550.02 | 45.43 | <0.000 1 |
| A | 1 020.84 | 1 | 1 020.84 | 29.92 | <0.000 1 |
| B | 204.27 | 1 | 204.27 | 5.99 | 0.028 2 |
| C | 496.78 | 1 | 496.78 | 14.56 | 0.001 9 |
| D | 435.13 | 1 | 435.13 | 12.75 | 0.003 1 |
| AB | 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 | 2.22×10-3 | 0.963 1 |
| AC | 0.74 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.02 | 0.885 0 |
| AD | 231.50 | 1 | 231.50 | 6.78 | 0.020 8 |
| BC | 40.13 | 1 | 40.13 | 1.18 | 0.296 4 |
| BD | 61.39 | 1 | 61.39 | 1.80 | 0.201 2 |
| CD | 195.44 | 1 | 195.44 | 5.73 | 0.031 3 |
| A2 | 6 002.44 | 1 | 6 002.44 | 175.92 | <0.000 1 |
| B2 | 10 745.46 | 1 | 10 745.46 | 314.94 | <0.000 1 |
| C2 | 6 536.21 | 1 | 6 536.21 | 191.57 | <0.000 1 |
| D2 | 6 081.63 | 1 | 6 081.63 | 178.25 | <0.000 1 |
| 残差Residual | 477.67 | 14 | 34.12 | — | — |
| 失拟项Lack of fit | 413.36 | 10 | 41.34 | 2.57 | 0.188 0 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 64.31 | 4 | 16.08 | — | — |
| 总回归Total regression | 22 177.88 | 28 | — | — | — |
Fig.3 3D Response surface of NR and NHP from dried immature Huyou (Citrus×aurantium Changshanhuyou) fruit A, Ethanol volume fraction; B, Ultrasonic time; C, Ultrasonic power; D, Solid?liquid ratio.
| 树脂种类 Resin type | NR吸附率 NR adsorption rate | NR解吸率 NR desorption rate | NHP吸附率 NHP adsorption rate | NHP解吸率 NHP desorption rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB-8 | 91.26±0.18 a | 62.12±2.89 a | 92.86±0.15 a | 62.01±2.91 a |
| D101 | 86.03±0.36 c | 62.46±2.28 a | 88.03±0.32 c | 63.55±3.01 a |
| HPD-100 | 89.25±0.12 b | 63.36±3.09 a | 91.03±0.09 b | 62.56±3.78 a |
| HPD-300 | 82.77±0.72 d | 62.32±3.70 a | 84.97±0.58 d | 62.65±2.63 a |
Table 4 Polarity of various resins and their adsorption and desorption rates for NR and NHP
| 树脂种类 Resin type | NR吸附率 NR adsorption rate | NR解吸率 NR desorption rate | NHP吸附率 NHP adsorption rate | NHP解吸率 NHP desorption rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB-8 | 91.26±0.18 a | 62.12±2.89 a | 92.86±0.15 a | 62.01±2.91 a |
| D101 | 86.03±0.36 c | 62.46±2.28 a | 88.03±0.32 c | 63.55±3.01 a |
| HPD-100 | 89.25±0.12 b | 63.36±3.09 a | 91.03±0.09 b | 62.56±3.78 a |
| HPD-300 | 82.77±0.72 d | 62.32±3.70 a | 84.97±0.58 d | 62.65±2.63 a |
Fig.4 Antioxidant activities of NR and NHP extracts from dried immature Huyou (Citrus×aurantium Changshanhuyou) fruit before and after purification Dots marked without the same lowercase letters indicate significant (p<0.05) differences in free radical scavenging capacity among samples at the same mass concentration. The same as below.
| [1] | 汪丽霞. 常山胡柚类黄酮化合物制备及应用开发[D]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2021. |
| WANG L X. The preparation and application of flavonoids from Changshan Huyou[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2021. | |
| [2] | 仲山民, 田荆祥, 吴美春. 常山胡柚果实贮藏期间营养成分含量的变化[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 1994(1): 53-57. |
| ZHONG S M, TIAN J X, WU M C. Variation in nutrient content during storage of Citrus Changshan-huyou fruit[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 1994(1): 53-57. | |
| [3] | 赵雪梅, 叶兴乾, 席屿芳. 胡柚皮中黄酮类化合物提取及抗氧化性研究[J]. 果树学报, 2003, 20(4): 261-265. |
| ZHAO X M, YE X Q, XI Y F. Study on the extraction of flavonoids and antioxidation in Huyou peels[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2003, 20(4): 261-265. | |
| [4] | ZHANG Q X, SONG W Y, TAO G Q, et al. Comparison of chemical compositions and antioxidant activities for the immature fruits of Citrus Changshan-huyou Y.B. Chang and Citrus aurantium L[J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(13): 5057. |
| [5] | ZHAO X M, YE X Q, ZHU D Y. A novel compound isolated from the peels of Citrus Changshan-huyou[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2008, 43(12): 1208-1210 |
| [6] | DI MAJO D, GIAMMANCO M, LA GUARDIA M, et al. Flavanones in citrus fruit: structure-antioxidant activity relationships[J]. Food Research International, 2005, 38(10): 1161-1166. |
| [7] | SHILPA V S, SHAMS R, DASH K K, et al. Phytochemical properties, extraction, and pharmacological benefits of naringin: a review[J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(15): 5623. |
| [8] | HE J, ZHANG H P. Research progress on the anti-tumor effect of naringin[J]. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2023, 14: 1217001. |
| [9] | LING Y, SHI Z, YANG X L, et al. Hypolipidemic effect of pure total flavonoids from peel of citrus (PTFC) on hamsters of hyperlipidemia and its potential mechanism[J]. Experimental Gerontology, 2020, 130: 110786. |
| [10] | AKHTER S, ARMAN M S I, TAYAB M A, et al. Recent advances in the biosynthesis, bioavailability, toxicology, pharmacology, and controlled release of citrus neohesperidin[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2024, 64(15): 5073-5092. |
| [11] | BACANLı M, BAŞARAN AA, BAŞARAN N. The antioxidant and antigenotoxic properties of citrus phenolics limonene and naringin[J]. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2015, 81: 160-170. |
| [12] | XU F, ZANG J, CHEN D Z, et al. Neohesperidin induces cellular apoptosis in human breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells via activating the Bcl-2/Bax-mediated signaling pathway[J]. Natural Product Communications, 2012, 7(11): 1475-1478. |
| [13] | 李俊儒. 柚子皮黄酮类化合物及其应用研究进展[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2016, 15(20): 40-41. |
| LI J R. Research progress on flavonoids from pomelo peel and its application[J]. Industrial & Science Tribune, 2016, 15(20): 40-41. | |
| [14] | 王玲玲, 边祥雨, 高蔚娜, 等. 植物类黄酮提取纯化技术研究进展[J]. 营养学报, 2019, 41(6): 606-610. |
| WANG L L, BIAN X Y, GAO W N, et al. Advances in extraction and purification techniques for flavonoids in plants[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2019, 41(6): 606-610. | |
| [15] | 赵林涛. 柑橘新橙皮苷二氢查尔酮及其衍生物的抗炎和抗氧化活性评价[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2024. |
| ZHAO L T. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of citrus neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and its derivatives[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2024. | |
| [16] | 许鹭. 柚皮中柚皮苷的提取、分离纯化及其固体分散体与卵磷脂复合物的制备及表征[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2015. |
| XU L. Extraction, separation and purification of naringin from pomelo peel and preparation and characterization of its solid dispersion and lecithin complex[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2015. | |
| [17] | YU X L, WU H W, ZHANG L, et al. Optimization of naringin extraction, synthesis of dihydrochalcone and its effects on reducing blood lipid levels in vitro[J]. Molecules, 2024, 29(23): 5778. |
| [18] | 陆胜民, 王璐, 郑美瑜, 等. 干燥方式和臭氧对胡柚小青果干品有效成分和农残的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2022, 22(8): 71-75. |
| LU S M, WANG L, ZHENG M Y, et al. Effects of drying methods and ozone treatment on effective components and pesticide residue in dried immature Huyou fruits[J]. Storage and Process, 2022, 22(8): 71-75. | |
| [19] | WANG Z W, HOU X J, JIN J X, et al. Development of a green and optimized process for isolating high-purity naringin and neohesperidin from Qu Aurantii Fructus[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2025, 371: 133198. |
| [20] | SEO CS, SHIN HK. Simultaneous determination of 12 marker components in yeonkyopaedok-San using HPLC-PDA and LC-MS/MS[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(5): 1713. |
| [21] | 周红艳, 陆胜民, 李彥坡, 等. 瓯柑果皮类黄酮提取纯化及其功能活性评价[J]. 食品科技, 2024, 49(8): 228-237. |
| ZHOU H Y, LU S M, LI Y P, et al. Extraction and purification processes of flavonoids from ougan (Citrus suavissima Hort.Ex tanak) peel and its biological activity evaluation[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2024, 49(8): 228-237. | |
| [22] | 张嘉琼, 刘晨星, 曹艳, 等. 椪柑陈皮总黄酮大孔树脂纯化工艺优化及其体外活性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2026, 47(2): 239-248. |
| ZHANG J Q, LIU C X, CAO Y, et al. Optimization of macroporous resin purification process and in vitro activity study of total flavonoids from Citrus reticulata cv. Ponkan peel[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(2): 239-248. | |
| [23] | 叶雨濛, 胡诗雨, 徐象华, 等. 衢枳壳及其近缘种中四种黄酮苷类成分含量测定与相关性分析[J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志, 2022, 32(8): 752-755. |
| YE Y M, HU S Y, XU X H, et al. Determination and correlation analysis of four flavonoids and glycosides in Qu Aurantii Fructus and its related species[J]. Zhejiang Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 2022, 32(8): 752-755. | |
| [24] | 许守超, 陈屠梦, 包绍印, 等. 基于响应面试验设计优选衢枳壳多指标成分工艺研究[J]. 中药材, 2019, 42(11): 2617-2621. |
| XU S C, CHEN T M, BAO S Y, et al. Optimization of extraction process of multi-target constituents from Citrus Changshan-huyou based on the response surface design[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2019, 42(11): 2617-2621. | |
| [25] | 刘飞. 枳壳总黄酮提取与分离纯化工艺研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2012. |
| LIU F. Research on the process of extraction and purification of total flavonoids from Fructus aurantii[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2012. | |
| [26] | KUMAR A, ROUT RK, RAO PS, et al. Optimization of pulsed mode sonication and in silico molecular docking study for antioxidant properties of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) peels[J]. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 2023, 46(6): e14111. |
| [27] | 郑雪良, 刘春荣, 王登亮, 等. 胡柚小青果的黄酮类化合物及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(7): 1185-1191. |
| ZHENG X L, LIU C R, WANG D L, et al. Flavonoids contents and antioxidant activities in Citrus paradisi cv. Changshan Huyou during development[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2015, 27(7): 1185-1191. | |
| [28] | 姜红宇, 刘郁峰, 盘雪, 等. 响应面法优化胡柚幼果中柚皮苷与新橙皮苷的提取工艺[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2017, 34(11): 1546-1551. |
| JIANG H Y, LIU Y F, PAN X, et al. Response surface methodology for optimization of extraction process of naringin and neohesperidin from Huyou fruitlet[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy, 2017, 34(11): 1546-1551. |
| [1] | CHEN Qianqian, TAO Wenyang, ZHENG Meiyu, MA Zijia, WANG Lu, LU Shengmin. Optimization of ethanol extraction and purification process of loquat flowers based on in vitro tyrosinase inhibitory activity and preliminary identification of active components [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1144-1153. |
| [2] | WANG Lu, DING Zhe, LU Shengmin, JIANG Hao, ZHENG Meiyu, YANG Ying. OSA-modified porous starch loading and improving bioavailability of naringin [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 425-433. |
| [3] | YUAN Yuejin, HONG Chen, XU Yingying, WANG Dong, ZHANG Man, JING Xuesong. Optimization of carrot vacuum pulsating steam blanching process under combined drying method [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 163-172. |
| [4] | JIA Yangyang, NIE Zongning, LUO Xingyu, YANG Kaihui, HE Chunlei. Study on processing technology of exogenous polyphenol oxidase assisted fermentation of Tibetan tea [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1720-1729. |
| [5] | YANG Ying, SHI Yingchun, XING Jianrong, LIU Zhe, ZHENG Meiyu, LU Shengmin. Optimization of “terpenoids removing and aroma enhancing” process for grapefruit essential oil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(11): 2128-2136. |
| [6] | ZOU Gaoxi, ZHAO Chuntian, QIU Juanping. Optimization of fermentation technology of biocontrol bacterium Bacillus subtilis 210 by response surface analysis [J]. , 2017, 29(5): 799-805. |
| [7] | CHEN Xin\|feng1,2, ZHANG Zhi\|guo2, WANG Jun\|hong2, ZHOU Li\|gen2,*. Optimization of microwave solid\|state synthesis for acete peptide chelating calcium with response surface method#br# [J]. , 2015, 27(8): 1473-. |
| [8] | YING Chen, RUAN Chuan\|fen, TANG Yi\|fei, ZHANG Hua\|wei*. Optimization of fermentation conditions of the endophytic strain Lysobacter enzymogenes R\|2\|1 for microbicide production [J]. , 2015, 27(2): 220-. |
| [9] | MA Wen\|guang1,2, LI Zhan3, ZHENG Yun\|ye1,2, TIAN Yi\|xin1,2, GUAN Ya\|jing3, ZHU Li\|wei3, HU Jin3,*. Combining response surface analysis and principal component analysis to optimize priming condition in tobacco seeds [J]. , 2015, 27(1): 16-. |
| [10] | LI Meng-qin;WANG Yue;XU Yan-yan;ZHOU Hong-lu;LIU Yan-qi. Response surface optimization of ultra-high pressure modification conditions of the wheat bran [J]. , 2011, 23(3): 0-603. |
| [11] | SUN Hong;TANG Jiang-WU;GE Xiang-yang;*. Optimization of conditions in solid-fermentation of rapeseed meal using response surface methodology [J]. , 2009, 21(3): 0-306. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||