不同生存基质对中华淡翅盲蝽生长发育和繁殖的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.03.12

浙江农业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 432-436.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.03.12

不同生存基质对中华淡翅盲蝽生长发育和繁殖的影响

谢宇凯^1,2, 郑许松², 田俊策², 张大羽^1,*, 吕仲贤^2,*

1.浙江农林大学研究生院,浙江临安 311300;
2.省部共建浙江省植物有害生物防控国家重点实验室培育基地,浙江省农业科学院植物保护与微生物研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2017-07-03 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2018-03-21
通讯作者: *吕仲贤,E-mail: luzxmh@163.com;张大羽,E-mail: zhangdayu@zafu.edu.cn
作者简介:谢宇凯(1992—),男,浙江临安人,硕士,研究方向为水稻害虫生物防治。E-mail:707728330@qq.com
基金资助:
浙江省重点研发计划(2015C02014);国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0200800)

Effects of different survival substrates on growth, development and reproduction of Tytthus chinensis

XIE Yukai^1,2, ZHENG Xusong², TIAN Junce², ZHANG Dayu^1,*, LYU Zhongxian^2,*

1. College of Postgraduate, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin'an 311300, China;
2. State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Zhejiang Sustainable Pest and Disease Control/Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2017-07-03 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-03-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中华淡翅盲蝽Tytthus chinensis (Stål) 是稻飞虱最重要的捕食天敌之一,因此实现中华淡翅盲蝽人工饲养是有效控制褐飞虱的关键。采用四季豆、湿棉球、水稻茎作为生存基质人工饲养中华淡翅盲蝽,研究其对中华淡翅盲蝽若虫生长发育和成虫繁殖的影响。结果表明,中华淡翅盲蝽若虫在水稻茎上的存活率最高,其次是四季豆,最低的是湿棉球,在水稻上的若虫历期显著短于在其他2个基质上。虽然在四季豆上的产卵量要显著低于水稻上的产卵量,但雌虫寿命、卵孵化率和若虫存活率与在水稻上的差异不显著,且显著高于湿棉球上的;在湿棉球上的卵孵化时间显著长于在四季豆和水稻茎上的时间。中华淡翅盲蝽在水稻和四季豆上种群趋势为22.9和11.2,能建立持续的种群,说明四季豆可以作为中华淡翅盲蝽室内饲养的生存基质,进行中华淡翅盲蝽的人工繁殖。

关键词: 水稻, 天敌, 四季豆, 人工繁殖, 生长发育

Abstract: Tytthus chinensis (Stål) is a key predator of rice planthopper, a major pest of rice in China. Biological control of rice planthopper could be much more effective and feasible by improving the techniques of artificial breeding of natural enemies. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of different survival substrates, including kidney bean, wet cotton ball and rice stem, on the growth, development and reproduction of T.chinensis. The results showed that different survival substrates had significant influence on the development, survival and reproduction of T. chinensis. The survival rate of T. chinensis was the highest in the rice stem treatment, followed by the kidney bean treatment. The survival rate in wet cotton ball treatment was the lowest. Nymph duration in rice stem treatment was significantly shorter than the other two treatments, which indicated that kidney bean and wet cotton ball significantly impact the growth of T.chinensis. Though the fecundity in kidney bean treatment was significantly lower than those in rice treatment, the longevity, egg hatching rate and nymphal survival rate in kidney bean treatment were similar with those in rice stem treatment, and were significantly higher than those in wet cotton ball treatment. The population trend index of T. chinensis on rice stem and kidney bean treatment was 22.9 and 11.2 respectively, which meant T. chinensis could build a continuous population efficiently. The results indicated that kidney bean could be used as a feasible survival substitute for T. chinensis.

Key words: rice, predator, kidney bean, reproduction, growth and development

中图分类号:

S435.112

谢宇凯, 郑许松, 田俊策, 张大羽, 吕仲贤. 不同生存基质对中华淡翅盲蝽生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(3): 432-436.

XIE Yukai, ZHENG Xusong, TIAN Junce, ZHANG Dayu, LYU Zhongxian. Effects of different survival substrates on growth, development and reproduction of Tytthus chinensis[J]. , 2018, 30(3): 432-436.

参考文献

[1] 娄永根, 程家安. 稻飞虱灾变机理及可持续治理的基础研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2011,48(2):231-238.
LOU Y G, CHENG J A.Basic research on the outbreak mechanism and sustainbale management of rice planthoppers[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2011, 48(2):231-238. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 夏敬源. 我国重大农业生物灾害暴发现状与防控成效[J].中国植保导报, 2008,28(1): 5-9.
XIA J Y.Outbreaks of major agricultural pests and the control achievements in China[J]. China Plant Prothection, 2008, 28(1):5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 吴伟坚,余金咏,高泽正,等. 杂食性盲蝽在生物防治上的应用[J]. 中国生物防治,2004(1):61-64.
WU W J, YU J Y, GAO Z Z, et al.The use of omnivorous mirids for biological control of pests[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2004(1):61-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 乔飞. 稻田生态系统捕食性天敌群内捕食作用研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2014.
QIAO F.Research on intraguild predation in paddy fields[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 祝梓杰. 中华淡翅盲蝽种群生物学:生物与非生物环境因素对发育、存活和繁殖的影响[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015.
ZHU Z J.Population biology of Tytthus chinensis Stal(Hemiptera: Miridae): Influences of biotic and abiotic environmental factors on development,survival and reproduction[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 刘家莉,杨斌,陆永跃,等. 改进实验种群生命表编制的方法:以黑肩绿盔盲蝽为例[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(6):3206-3212.
LIU J L, YANG B, LU Y Y, et al.An improbement on life table of experimental population:example from Cyrtorrhinus lividipenn is Reuter(Hemiptera:Miridae)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,29(6):3206-3212. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 张旭. 中国叶盲蝽亚科的系统学研究(半翅目:异翅亚目:盲蝽科)[D].天津:南开大学,2010.
ZHANG X.The study on systematics of subfamily phylinae from China[D]. Tianjin: Nankai University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 张士昶. 南方小花蝽人工规模化饲养技术的研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2009.
ZHANG S C.The study of artificial mass rearing technology of Orius similis(Zheng)[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University,2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 黄林茂,黄寿山. 黑肩绿盲蝽捕食褐飞虱卵的功能与数值反应[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(15):4187-4195.
HUANG L M, HUANG S S.Functional and numerical responses of the predacious plant bug on the rice brown Planthopper egg[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(15):4187-4195. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 马骏. 豚草卷蛾的风险评价及其对豚草和苍耳的控制作用[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2002.
MA J.Risk Analysis of Epiblema strenuana(Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) and its control efficiency against Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Xanthium sibiricun(Compositae) [D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 陆宴辉,吴孔明,蔡晓明,等. 利用四季豆饲养盲蝽的方法[J]. 植物保护学报,2008,35(3):215-219.
LU Y H, WU K M, CAI X M, et al.A rearing method for mirids using the green bean, Phaseolus vulgaris in the laboratory[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Snica, 2008, 35(3):215-219. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 何晶晶. 影响黑肩绿盲蝽大量繁殖的生态学因子[D].杭州:杭州师范大学,2013.
HE J J.Ecological factors affecting artificial culture of mirid bug Cyrtorhinus lividipennis(Reuter)[D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Normal University, 2013.

[1]	陈丹, 汤翠凤, 董超, 甘树仙, 李俊, 阿新祥, 张斐斐, 杨雅云, 牛赛赛, 戴陆园. 云南软米地方品种籽粒淀粉品质特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 203-214.
[2]	邹文雄, 吴伟, 关亚静, 曹栋栋, 卞晓波, 施德云, 丁丽玲. 水稻种子休眠调控技术研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 369-379.
[3]	许娜, 王大海, 杜传印, 杜沙沙, 王晓萌, 张彦, 张玉琴, 吴元华, 管恩森, 石屹. 株距对烟苗生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1342-1350.
[4]	谷建诚, 郭彬, 林义成, 傅庆林, 刘琛, 丁能飞, 李华, 李凝玉. 根表铁膜对水稻镉吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 963-970.
[5]	夏文建, 秦文婧, 刘佳, 陈晓芬, 张丽芳, 曹卫东, 徐昌旭, 陈静蕊. 长期绿肥利用下红壤性水稻土有机碳和可溶性有机碳的垂直分布特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 878-885.
[6]	邵文奇, 钟平, 董玉兵, 孙春梅, 纪力, 庄春, 陈川, 章安康. 托盘育苗中光温资源差异及其对水稻秧苗素质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 191-199.
[7]	杨红云, 罗建军, 孙爱珍, 万颖, 易文龙. 基于图像特征的水稻叶片全氮含量估测模型研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2232-2243.
[8]	耿艳飞, 吕明芳. 植物富含半胱氨酸类受体激酶家族研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2303-2312.
[9]	张馨月, 李友发, 刘江宁, 富昊伟. 利用广亲和基因S5-n的功能标记鉴定特殊配组类型杂交种纯度研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 15-19.
[10]	马瑞芳, 马进川, 马军伟, 周大云, 王强, 丁潮洪. 四季豆丽芸2号生长动态及其养分吸收规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 80-85.
[11]	邴静静, 高红梅. 基于SWOT分析的天津市优质稻米产业发展研究--以"小站稻"为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1217-1223.
[12]	刘慧洁, 徐恒, 邱文怡, 李晓芳, 张华, 朱英, 李春寿, 王良超. 转录因子在植物生长发育及非生物逆境响应的作用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1205-1214.
[13]	潘俊峰, 钟旭华, 黄农荣, 刘彦卓, 田卡, 梁开明, 彭碧琳, 傅友强, 胡香玉. 不同栽培模式对华南双季晚稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 857-868.
[14]	何海燕, 柴荣耀, 邱海萍, 毛雪琴, 王艳丽, 孙国仓. 五个抗稻瘟病基因在浙江省水稻品种中的分布和抗性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 922-929.
[15]	索晨, 罗小三, 赵朕, 孙雪, 张丹, 陈燕. 大气降尘污染对典型农作物生长发育及重金属含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 938-945.

不同生存基质对中华淡翅盲蝽生长发育和繁殖的影响

Effects of different survival substrates on growth, development and reproduction of Tytthus chinensis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价