不同色素和包装方式对中式香肠贮藏品质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.02.18

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 360-369.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.02.18

不同色素和包装方式对中式香肠贮藏品质的影响

张映萍¹^,²(), 唐宏刚¹, 李欢欢¹, 张晋¹, 陈黎洪¹, 杨叶爽¹^,², 王复龙¹, 陈伊凡¹^,^*(), 朱仁俊²^,^*()

1.浙江省农业科学院食品科学研究所,浙江杭州 310021
2.云南农业大学食品科学技术学院,云南昆明 650201

收稿日期:2021-04-16 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-02
通讯作者: 陈伊凡,朱仁俊
作者简介:朱仁俊,E-mail: 2421125201@qq.com
陈伊凡,E-mail: cgxllx@163.com;
张映萍(1996—),女,云南弥渡人,硕士研究生,研究方向为食品加工与安全。E-mail: 15125816720@163.com
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金(LQ17C200003);浙江省“一带一路”国际科技合作项目(2019C04022);浙江省基础公益研究计划(LGN18C200027)

Effect of colorant and packaging on quality of Chinese sausage during storage

ZHANG Yingping¹^,²(), TANG Honggang¹, LI Huanhuan¹, ZHANG Jin¹, CHEN Lihong¹, YANG Yeshuang¹^,², WANG Fulong¹, CHEN Yifan¹^,^*(), ZHU Renjun²^,^*()

1. Institute of Food Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
2. College of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China

Received:2021-04-16 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-02
Contact: CHEN Yifan,ZHU Renjun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为替代亚硝酸盐,本研究比较了不同色素和包装方式(散装、真空包装)对中式香肠短期贮藏过程中品质的影响。根据使用色素的不同,设以下处理:B组,空白对照,不添加色素;N组,添加100 mg·kg^-1亚硝酸钠;G组,添加糖化血红蛋白色素(G-Hb)与异抗坏血酸钠;F组,添加G-Hb与番茄红素。结果显示,G组对中式香肠的色泽有明显的改善作用,但发色效果仍略逊于N组。与N组相比,G组对中式香肠水分活度、pH值、质构特性、丙二醛含量、菌落总数等指标无明显不良作用。与散装相比,采用真空包装可更好地保持香肠原有的品质特性(色泽、水分活度和质构特性等),加强对香肠中脂质氧化的抑制作用。综合来看,在中式香肠的实际生产中,若要替代亚硝酸钠,可在添加合适色素的基础上,搭配使用真空包装,以更好地保持产品的品质特性。

关键词: 中式香肠, 血红蛋白色素, 贮藏, 品质, 真空包装

Abstract:

In order to seek substitute of nitrite in Chinese sausage production, the effects of different colorants and packaging (bulk storage and vacuum packaging) on the quality of Chinese sausage during storage were investigated. Based on the adopted colorant in Chinse sausage production, four treatment groups were set: group B, control, no colorant was added; group N, 100 mg·kg^-1 sodium nitrite was added; group G, glycated hemoglobin (G-Hb) andsodium isascorbate were added; group F, G-Hb and lycopene were added. The results showed that the color of Chinese sausage in group G was improved, but its color forming effect was no better than group N. Compared with group N,no negative effects of group G on the water actitivy, pH value, texture characteristics, malondialdehyde content, total number of bacterial colonies were found. Compared with bulk storgae, vacuum packaging was beneficial for the maintenance of Chinese sausage quality (color, water activity, texture characteristic, etc), and inhibit lipid peroxidation. In conclusion, it was feasible to use G-Hb and sodium isascorbate as substitute of nitrite in Chinese sausage production. At the same time, vacuum packaging should also be applied to better maintain the quality of Chinese sausage during storage.

Key words: Chinese sausage, hemoglobin, storage, quality, vacuum packaging

中图分类号:

TS251.5

张映萍, 唐宏刚, 李欢欢, 张晋, 陈黎洪, 杨叶爽, 王复龙, 陈伊凡, 朱仁俊. 不同色素和包装方式对中式香肠贮藏品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 360-369.

ZHANG Yingping, TANG Honggang, LI Huanhuan, ZHANG Jin, CHEN Lihong, YANG Yeshuang, WANG Fulong, CHEN Yifan, ZHU Renjun. Effect of colorant and packaging on quality of Chinese sausage during storage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(2): 360-369.

图/表 6

参考文献 37

[1]	周星辰, 王卫, 吉莉莉, 等. 传统腌腊制品及其安全性控制研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2020, 56(6):87-91.
	ZHOU X C, WANG W, JI L L, et al. Research progress on traditional cured products and their safety control[J]. Food and Fermentation Sciences & Technology, 2020, 56(6):87-91.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	于海, 秦春君, 葛庆丰, 等. 中式香肠加工及贮藏中脂肪氧化对其品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(13):119-125.
	YU H, QIN C J, GE Q F, et al. Effect of lipid oxidation on Chinese sausage quality during processing and storage[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(13):119-125.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[3]	NAVARRO J L, NADAL M I, NIETO P, et al. Effect of nitrate and nitrite curing salts on the generation and oxidation of fatty acids in non-fermented sausages[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2001, 212(4):421-425. DOI URL
[4]	娄学飞, 陈晨. 磷酸盐、亚硝酸盐在肉制品中的使用现状[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2017(9):83-84.
	LOU X F, CHEN C. Application status of phosphate and nitrite in meat products[J]. China Food Safety Magazine, 2017(9):83-84.(in Chinese)
[5]	王玲. 畜禽血液的开发利用与研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2018, 37(5):42-43.
	WANG L. Research progress and development and utilization of livestock and poultry blood[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 37(5):42-43.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	EYILER E, OZTAN A. Production of frankfurters with tomato powder as a natural additive[J]. LWT: Food Science and Technology, 2011, 44(1):307-311. DOI URL
[7]	YU X, WU H Z, ZHANG J H. Effect of Monascus as a nitrite substitute on color, lipid oxidation, and proteolysis of fermented meat mince[J]. Food Science and Biotechnology, 2015, 24(2):575-581. DOI URL
[8]	刘方菁, 刘辉, 宁娜. 红曲色素替代亚硝酸盐对肉类护色的研究进展[J]. 肉类研究, 2011, 25(1):33-36.
	LIU F J, LIU H, NING N. Research progress of manascus pigment substitute for nitrite in meat color protection[J]. Meat Research, 2011, 25(1):33-36.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	徐海祥, 邵欢欢, 施帅. Nisin替代部分亚硝对中式香肠品质影响的研究[J]. 肉类工业, 2012(9):38-41.
	XU H X, SHAO H H, SHI S. Study on effect of Nisin on Chinese sausage quality[J]. Meat Industry, 2012(9):38-41.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	VARELTZIS K, BUCK E M, LABBE R G. Effectiveness of a betalains/potassium sorbate system versus sodium nitrite for color development and control of total aerobes, Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium sporogenes in chicken frankfurters[J]. Journal of Food Protection, 1984, 47(7):532-536. DOI URL
[11]	郭卓钊, 潘丽娟, 郭美媛, 等. 肉制品发色剂研究进展[J]. 农产品加工, 2020(1):90-93.
	GUO Z Z, PAN L J, GUO M Y, et al. Research progress on meat coloring agents[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2020(1):90-93.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	徐梅, 黄攀, 陈从贵, 等. 低盐肉制品贮藏特性研究进展[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(16):192-197.
	XU M, HUANG P, CHEN C G, et al. Research progress on the storage properties of low-salt meat products: a review[J]. Food Research and Development, 2019, 40(16):192-197.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	李林. 改进型城口腊肉品质变化规律与方便产品的开发[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2016.
	LI L. Research on the quality change of modified Chongqing bacon and the development of instant bacon products[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	傅樱花, 马长伟. 腊肉加工过程中脂质分解及氧化的研究[J]. 食品科技, 2004, 29(1):42-44.
	FU Y H, MA C W. Study on lipolysis and oxidation during the processing of Chinese bacon[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2004, 29(1):42-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	罗玉龙, 靳烨, 靳志敏, 等. 不同包装条件对羊肉发酵香肠品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(18):252-256.
	LUO Y L, JIN Y, JIN Z M, et al. Effects of different packaging methods on the quality characteristics of fermented mutton sausage[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(18):252-256.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	ANDRÉS S C, GARCÍ A M E, ZARITZKY N E, et al. Storage stability of low-fat chicken sausages[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2006, 72(4):311-319. DOI URL
[17]	安攀宇, 陈韬. 复配天然抗氧化剂在川味香肠中的应用[J]. 肉类研究, 2012, 26(2):37-42.
	AN P Y, CHEN T. Application of formulated natural antioxidants in Sichuan style sausage[J]. Meat Research, 2012, 26(2):37-42.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	朱培培. 红叶甜菜和糖基化酰基血红蛋白对中式香肠品质的影响研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017.
	ZHU P P. Effects of red beet and glycosylated hemoglobin on the quality of Chinese sausages[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	肖朝耿, 谭芦兰, 朱培培, 等. 糖基化酰基血红蛋白与甜菜粉对中式香肠品质的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2019, 19(4):161-168.
	XIAO C G, TAN L L, ZHU P P, et al. Effect of glycosylated acyl hemoglobin and beet powder on the quality of Chinese sausage[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2019, 19(4):161-168.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	潘晓倩, 成晓瑜, 张顺亮, 等. 不同发酵剂对北方风干香肠色泽和风味品质的改良作用[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(14):81-86.
	PAN X Q, CHENG X Y, ZHANG S L, et al. Analysis of color and flavor improvement of different starter cultures on northern air-dried sausage[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(14):81-86.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[21]	李小妮, 于立梅, 曾晓房, 等. 干酪乳杆菌和植物乳杆菌对广式腊肠品质的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2020, 45(8):31-34.
	LI X N, YU L M, ZENG X F, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum on the quality of Cantonese sausage[J]. China Condiment, 2020, 45(8):31-34.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	师萱, 陈娅, 符宜谊, 等. 色差计在食品品质检测中的应用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2009, 30(5):373-375.
	SHI X, CHEN Y, FU Y Y, et al. Application of color difference meter in the quality inspection of food[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2009, 30(5):373-375.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	王军工, 徐志强, 朱英莲. 番茄红素对发酵香肠色度、亚硝基肌红蛋白形成及抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2021, 46(9):130-135.
	WANG J G, XU Z Q, ZHU Y L. Effect of lycopene on color, nitrosomyoglobin formation, and antioxidant properties of fermented sausage[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2021, 46(9):130-135.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	刘鹏雪, 刘昊天, 张欢, 等. 糖基化亚硝基血红蛋白部分替代亚硝酸钠对哈尔滨风干肠质量的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(16):45-51.
	LIU P X, LIU H T, ZHANG H, et al. Effect of partial substitution of sodium nitrite with glycosylated nitrosohaemoglobin on quality of Harbin air-dried sausage[J]. Food Science, 2019, 40(16):45-51.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	刘浩, 戴意强, 吴叶, 等. 发酵剂种类对羊肉香肠理化性质的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2019, 44(1):82-84.
	LIU H, DAI Y Q, WU Y, et al. Effect of starter types on physicochemical properties of mutton sausage[J]. China Condiment, 2019, 44(1):82-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	马汉军, 周光宏, 余小领, 等. 中式发酵香肠pH与Aw的关系及其对产品风味的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2009, 30(1):87-91.
	MA H J, ZHOU G H, YU X L, et al. The relationship between pH and Aw and its effects on the flavor of Chinese-style fermented sausage[J]. Food Research and Development, 2009, 30(1):87-91.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	宋忠祥, 夏延斌, 付浩华, 等. 异抗坏血酸钠在肉制品中的应用研究[J]. 农产品加工(学刊), 2014(1):76-78.
	SONG Z X, XIA Y B, FU H H, et al. Application of sodium erythorbate in meat products[J]. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing, 2014(1):76-78.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	马雪玲. 影响传统腊肠氧化变质因素及控制措施研究[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2014.
	MA X L. Study on factors affecting oxidation and deterioration of traditional sausage and control measures[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[29]	KOUTSOUMANIS K P, KENDALL P A, SOFOS J N. A comparative study on growth limits of Listeria monocytogenes as affected by temperature, pH and Aw when grown in suspension or on a solid surface[J]. Food Microbiology, 2004, 21(4):415-422. DOI URL
[30]	谢爱英, 张富新, 陈颖. 发酵香肠的pH值、水分含量与水分活度(Aw)的关系及其对制品贮藏性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2004, 30(11):143-146.
	XIE A Y, ZHANG F X, CHEN Y. Quality of fermented sausage during storage: relationship of pH, water content and water activity[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2004, 30(11):143-146.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	江登珍, 李敏, 康莉, 等. 食品质构评定方法的研究进展[J]. 现代食品, 2019(7):99-103.
	JIANG D Z, LI M, KANG L, et al. Research progress of food texture assessment methods[J]. Modern Food, 2019(7):99-103.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	樊路杰, 窦鸣乐, 王小宇, 等. 宰后肌肉抗氧化能力与肉品质的关系[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(5):1676-1680.
	FAN L J, DOU M L, WANG X Y, et al. Relationship between antioxidant capacity of postmortem muscle and meat quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(5):1676-1680.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	CHEN Q, KONG B H, HAN Q, et al. The role of bacterial fermentation in lipolysis and lipid oxidation in Harbin dry sausages and its flavour development[J]. LWT, 2017, 77:389-396. DOI URL
[34]	程伟, 杨清香, 张志强. 新疆烤肉加工过程中过氧化值及酸价测定[J]. 肉类工业, 2015(6):48-49.
	CHENG W, YANG Q X, ZHANG Z Q. Determination of peroxide value and acid value during processing of Xinjiang barbecue[J]. Meat Industry, 2015(6):48-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	王婷. 鸡肉热处理后肌内脂质氧化及影响因素的研究[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2019.
	WANG T. Study on intramuscular lipid oxidation and its influencing factors of chicken after heat treatment[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2019.
[36]	ANSORENA D, ASTIASARÁN I. Effect of storage and packaging on fatty acid composition and oxidation in dry fermented sausages made with added olive oil and antioxidants[J]. Meat Science, 2004, 67(2):237-244. DOI URL
[37]	李彦虎, 贠建民, 牛耀星, 等. 传统腌腊肉制品中微生物多样性及其功能研究进展[J]. 包装与食品机械, 2020, 38(2):52-58.
	LI Y H, YUN J M, NIU Y X, et al. Research progress of microbial diversity and functions in traditional cured meat product[J]. Packaging and Food Machinery, 2020, 38(2):52-58.(in Chinese with English abstract)

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

955

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	8	0	0	947

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	658	297
比例	69%	31%

摘要

610

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	610

	来源	本网站

	次数	610
	比例	100%

指标 Index	包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	贮藏时间Storage time/d
指标 Index	包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	0	10	20	30
L^*	散装	B	56.28±0.83 Aa	46.66±0.76 ABc	50.17±1.76 Ab	49.07±1.48 Abc
	Bulk storage	N	53.80±0.96 Ba	47.42±0.69 Ac	50.48±0.75 Ab	50.67±0.61 Ab
		G	53.32±0.88 Ca	45.37±0.18 Bc	46.73±0.61 Bbc	48.45±1.24 Aab
		F	55.62±0.86 Aa	43.72±0.67 Cb	45.05±0.27 Bb	42.22±0.65 Bc
	真空包装	B	56.28±0.83 Aa	47.47±0.34 Bc	51.62±0.62 Ab	55.68±1.02 Aa
	Vacuum packaging	N	53.80±0.96 Ba	51.19±1.08 Ab	47.71±0.34 Bb	48.05±1.22 Bb
		G	53.32±0.88 Ca	46.81±0.85 Bb	45.80±1.07 BCb	45.69±0.63 BCb
		F	55.62±0.86 Aa	44.09±1.08 Cb	44.58±0.83 Cb	44.02±1.06 Cb
a^*	散装Bulk storage	B	12.40±0.24 Ba	11.38±0.56 Bab	11.12±0.58 Cb	11.44±0.08 Cab
		N	14.63±0.39 Aa	12.54±0.20 ABb	12.17±0.09 BCb	15.03±0.57 Aa
		G	14.55±0.43 Aa	13.59±0.98 Aa	13.84±0.17 Aa	13.19±0.51 Ba
		F	15.66±0.80 Aa	11.24±0.49 Bc	13.09±0.73 ABb	13.43±0.49 Bb
	真空包装	B	12.40±0.24 Ba	11.17±0.43 Bb	12.89±0.10 Ca	12.93±0.28 Ca
	Vacuum packaging	N	14.63±0.39 Aa	14.52±0.66 Aa	14.81±0.53 Aa	14.90±0.20 Aa
		G	14.55±0.43 Aa	14.15±0.29 Aa	14.21±0.23 ABa	14.15±0.30 ABa
		F	15.66±0.80 Aa	13.82±0.27 Ab	13.53±0.65 BCb	13.61±0.47 BCb
b^*	散装Bulk storage	B	12.21±0.64 Ab	10.29±0.40 Bc	13.81±1.35 Bb	17.21±0.36 Aa
		N	8.74±0.34 Cc	10.83±1.09 ABb	15.03±0.11 ABa	16.01±0.42 Ba
		G	9.81±0.46 Bc	12.30±0.41 Ab	15.84±0.25 Aa	16.66±0.43 ABa
		F	12.96±0.18 Ab	12.27±0.77 Ab	16.09±0.23 Aa	16.34±0.51 ABa
	真空包装	B	12.21±0.64 Aab	10.47±1.00 Ab	12.60±0.78 Aab	13.56±0.72 Aa
	Vacuum packaging	N	8.74±0.34 Ca	9.54±0.31 Aa	10.16±0.70 Ba	9.54±0.78 Ba
		G	9.81±0.46 Ba	10.13±0.62 Aa	10.66±0.95 ABa	10.16±0.26 Ba
		F	12.96±0.18 Aa	10.58±0.51 Ab	10.16±0.65 Bb	9.97±0.41 Bb

指标 Index	包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	贮藏时间Storage time/d
指标 Index	包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	0	10	20	30
L^*	散装	B	56.28±0.83 Aa	46.66±0.76 ABc	50.17±1.76 Ab	49.07±1.48 Abc
	Bulk storage	N	53.80±0.96 Ba	47.42±0.69 Ac	50.48±0.75 Ab	50.67±0.61 Ab
		G	53.32±0.88 Ca	45.37±0.18 Bc	46.73±0.61 Bbc	48.45±1.24 Aab
		F	55.62±0.86 Aa	43.72±0.67 Cb	45.05±0.27 Bb	42.22±0.65 Bc
	真空包装	B	56.28±0.83 Aa	47.47±0.34 Bc	51.62±0.62 Ab	55.68±1.02 Aa
	Vacuum packaging	N	53.80±0.96 Ba	51.19±1.08 Ab	47.71±0.34 Bb	48.05±1.22 Bb
		G	53.32±0.88 Ca	46.81±0.85 Bb	45.80±1.07 BCb	45.69±0.63 BCb
		F	55.62±0.86 Aa	44.09±1.08 Cb	44.58±0.83 Cb	44.02±1.06 Cb
a^*	散装Bulk storage	B	12.40±0.24 Ba	11.38±0.56 Bab	11.12±0.58 Cb	11.44±0.08 Cab
		N	14.63±0.39 Aa	12.54±0.20 ABb	12.17±0.09 BCb	15.03±0.57 Aa
		G	14.55±0.43 Aa	13.59±0.98 Aa	13.84±0.17 Aa	13.19±0.51 Ba
		F	15.66±0.80 Aa	11.24±0.49 Bc	13.09±0.73 ABb	13.43±0.49 Bb
	真空包装	B	12.40±0.24 Ba	11.17±0.43 Bb	12.89±0.10 Ca	12.93±0.28 Ca
	Vacuum packaging	N	14.63±0.39 Aa	14.52±0.66 Aa	14.81±0.53 Aa	14.90±0.20 Aa
		G	14.55±0.43 Aa	14.15±0.29 Aa	14.21±0.23 ABa	14.15±0.30 ABa
		F	15.66±0.80 Aa	13.82±0.27 Ab	13.53±0.65 BCb	13.61±0.47 BCb
b^*	散装Bulk storage	B	12.21±0.64 Ab	10.29±0.40 Bc	13.81±1.35 Bb	17.21±0.36 Aa
		N	8.74±0.34 Cc	10.83±1.09 ABb	15.03±0.11 ABa	16.01±0.42 Ba
		G	9.81±0.46 Bc	12.30±0.41 Ab	15.84±0.25 Aa	16.66±0.43 ABa
		F	12.96±0.18 Ab	12.27±0.77 Ab	16.09±0.23 Aa	16.34±0.51 ABa
	真空包装	B	12.21±0.64 Aab	10.47±1.00 Ab	12.60±0.78 Aab	13.56±0.72 Aa
	Vacuum packaging	N	8.74±0.34 Ca	9.54±0.31 Aa	10.16±0.70 Ba	9.54±0.78 Ba
		G	9.81±0.46 Ba	10.13±0.62 Aa	10.66±0.95 ABa	10.16±0.26 Ba
		F	12.96±0.18 Aa	10.58±0.51 Ab	10.16±0.65 Bb	9.97±0.41 Bb

包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	贮藏时间Storage time/d
包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	0	10	20	30
散装Bulk storage	B	0.852±0.007 Ba	0.796±0.003 Ab	0.649±0.004 Bc	0.608±0.001 Bd
	N	0.829±0.002 Ca	0.752±0.001 Cb	0.657±0.001 Ac	0.594±0.002 Cd
	G	0.861±0.001 Aa	0.775±0.002 Bb	0.638±0.001 Cc	0.607±0.001 Bd
	F	0.866±0.003 Aa	0.795±0.004 Ab	0.627±0.002 Dc	0.624±0.001 Ac
真空包装	B	0.852±0.007 Bb	0.863±0.003 Aa	0.838±0.001 Bc	0.831±0.002 Cc
Vacuum packaging	N	0.829±0.002 Cc	0.850±0.002 Ba	0.846±0.002 Aa	0.836±0.003 Ab
	G	0.861±0.001 Aa	0.855±0.003 Bb	0.830±0.002 Cc	0.832±0.002 Bc
	F	0.866±0.003 Aa	0.862±0.002 Aa	0.833±0.001 Cb	0.835±0.002 ABb

包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	贮藏时间Storage time/d
包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	0	10	20	30
散装Bulk storage	B	0.852±0.007 Ba	0.796±0.003 Ab	0.649±0.004 Bc	0.608±0.001 Bd
	N	0.829±0.002 Ca	0.752±0.001 Cb	0.657±0.001 Ac	0.594±0.002 Cd
	G	0.861±0.001 Aa	0.775±0.002 Bb	0.638±0.001 Cc	0.607±0.001 Bd
	F	0.866±0.003 Aa	0.795±0.004 Ab	0.627±0.002 Dc	0.624±0.001 Ac
真空包装	B	0.852±0.007 Bb	0.863±0.003 Aa	0.838±0.001 Bc	0.831±0.002 Cc
Vacuum packaging	N	0.829±0.002 Cc	0.850±0.002 Ba	0.846±0.002 Aa	0.836±0.003 Ab
	G	0.861±0.001 Aa	0.855±0.003 Bb	0.830±0.002 Cc	0.832±0.002 Bc
	F	0.866±0.003 Aa	0.862±0.002 Aa	0.833±0.001 Cb	0.835±0.002 ABb

指标 Index	包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	贮藏时间Storage time/d
指标 Index	包装方式 Packaging	组别 Group	0	10	20	30
硬度	散装	B	1 289.3±93.6 Ad	2 500.8±27.7 Bc	3 482.0±558.8 Bb	6 022.2±604.0 Aa
Hardness/g	Bulk storage	N	1 501.1±303.5 Ac	4 592.1±734.2 Ab	4 748.5±381.9 Ab	8 355.7±192.5 Aa
		G	1 435.5±125.5 Ad	2 592.8±189.8 Bc	4 078.3±256.5 ABb	8 311.0±913.2 Aa
		F	1 272.0±100.5 Ac	2 980.2±74.1 Bbc	3 989.3±268.1 ABb	7 322.1±1 658.5 Aa
	真空包装	B	1 289.3±93.6 Aab	1 436.7±289.6 Aab	1 110.8±42.5 Bb	1 654.7±105.2 Ca
	Vacuum packaging	N	1 501.1±303.5 Ab	1 646.6±78.5 Ab	1 140.8±88.8 Bc	2 190.7±128.8 Ba
		G	1 435.5±125.5 Ab	1 656.6±278.9 Ab	1 445.1±162.8 ABb	2 729.3±77.0 Aa
		F	1 272.0±100.5 Ab	1 463.0±78.8 Ab	1 586.7±210.1 Ab	2 278.3±142.8 Ba
弹性	散装	B	0.575±0.020 Ca	0.542±0.031 Aa	0.537±0.044 Aa	0.453±0.021 Ab
Elasticity	Bulk storage	N	0.718±0.012 Aa	0.582±0.023 Ab	0.578±0.017 Ab	0.523±0.054 Ab
		G	0.703±0.026 Aa	0.572±0.056 Ab	0.555±0.025 Ab	0.517±0.039 Ab
		F	0.619±0.002 Ba	0.563±0.036 Aab	0.543±0.026 Ab	0.513±0.027 Ab
	真空包装	B	0.575±0.020 Cab	0.621±0.028 BCa	0.603±0.016 Ba	0.524±0.032 Bb
	Vacuum packaging	N	0.718±0.012 Aa	0.688±0.029 Aab	0.667±0.023 Abc	0.635±0.015 Ac
		G	0.703±0.026 Aa	0.663±0.017 ABa	0.675±0.004 Aa	0.634±0.012 Ab
		F	0.619±0.002 Bab	0.588±0.024 Cb	0.658±0.022 Aa	0.592±0.023 Ab
咀嚼性	散装	B	387.5±25.5 Bb	576.4±83.6 Ba	624.2±196.2 Ba	740.8±98.4 Ba
Chewiness/g	Bulk storage	N	677.0±53.5 Ac	1 165.8±68.4 Aab	1 042.7±111.6 ABb	1 355.8±87.7 Aa
		G	641.5±43.8 Ab	666.1±152.1 Bb	938.3±57.0 Bab	1 223.2±202.7 ABa
		F	413.3±50.4 Bb	837.1±24.8 Bab	1 188.0±111.5 Aa	1 385.2±475.4 Aa
	真空包装	B	387.5±25.6 Ba	429.6±151.0 Ba	405.5±4.7 Ba	465.6±66.9 Ba
	Vacuum packaging	N	677.0±53.5 Aa	686.6±29.4 Aa	557.5±35.9 Ab	616.6±48.4 Aab
		G	641.5±43.8 Aa	684.4±96.8 Aa	584.7±54.6 Aa	662.8±75.4 Aa
		F	413.3±50.4 Bb	483.6±29.9 ABb	561.3±14.7 Aa	599.4±32.1 ABa
内聚性	散装	B	0.517±0.021 Aa	0.363±0.052 Ab	0.358±0.012 Bb	0.312±0.031 Ab
Cohesiveness	Bulk storage	N	0.600±0.029 Aa	0.420±0.041 Ab	0.415±0.030 Ab	0.342±0.012 Ac
		G	0.532±0.119 Aa	0.428±0.043 Aab	0.374±0.006 ABb	0.319±0.023 Ab
		F	0.523±0.022 Aa	0.421±0.014 Ab	0.357±0.021 Bc	0.311±0.014 Ad
	真空包装	B	0.517±0.021 Aab	0.518±0.019 Bab	0.559±0.007 Ba	0.474±0.023 Bb
	Vacuum packaging	N	0.600±0.029 Aab	0.568±0.022 Abc	0.642±0.023 Aa	0.536±0.014 Ac
		G	0.532±0.119 Aa	0.569±0.016 Aa	0.600±0.025 Ba	0.523±0.010 Ab
		F	0.523±0.022 Abc	0.558±0.016 ABab	0.573±0.005 Ba	0.511±0.014 Ac
回复性	散装	B	0.186±0.005 Ba	0.134±0.014 Ab	0.144±0.007 Aab	0.099±0.034 Ab
Resilience	Bulk storage	N	0.233±0.004 Aa	0.133±0.005 Ab	0.142±0.004 Ab	0.133±0.014 Ab
		G	0.201±0.013 Ba	0.150±0.023 Ab	0.153±0.008 Ab	0.131±0.012 Ab
		F	0.198±0.005 Ba	0.145±0.008 Ab	0.139±0.012 Ab	0.100±0.019 Ac
	真空包装	B	0.186±0.005 Bb	0.184±0.017 Bb	0.221±0.015 ABa	0.160±0.009 Ab
	Vacuum packaging	N	0.233±0.004 Aa	0.197±0.014 Ab	0.227±0.007 Aa	0.183±0.008 Ab
		G	0.201±0.013 Ba	0.209±0.003 Aa	0.212±0.003 ABa	0.170±0.007 Ab
		F	0.198±0.005 Ba	0.173±0.023 Ba	0.199±0.013 Ba	0.163±0.018 Aa

不同色素和包装方式对中式香肠贮藏品质的影响

Effect of colorant and packaging on quality of Chinese sausage during storage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨蕾, 洪林, 刘兆俊, 杨海健, 王武. 六个金柑品种果实品质与营养综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 534-547.
[2]	莫言玲, 张文静, 罗亚兰, 曾静, 陈静静, 刘义华. 宽柄芥种质资源农艺性状与营养品质性状鉴定与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 317-328.
[3]	蔡继业, 房祥军, 韩延超, 丁玉庭, 陈杭君, 吴伟杰, 郜海燕. 气调贮藏对东魁杨梅品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 352-359.
[4]	张娜, 周慕川, 王庆港, 丁玉先, 陈爱强. 热水处理对南丰蜜橘贮藏品质的影响及传热分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 370-377.
[5]	欧秀琼, 李睿, 张晓春, 钟正泽, 李星, 景绍红, 郭宗义, 李兴桂. 肌纤维类型组成对猪肌肉品质与能量代谢的影响研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 196-203.
[6]	吴嘉维, 姚张良, 胡琪琪, 张杰, 陈轶, 蒋建荣, 周国鑫, 王霞. 浙北桐乡梨锈病防治适期和防治药剂研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1668-1675.
[7]	贾洋洋, 聂枞宁, 罗兴禹, 杨凯辉, 何春雷. 外源酶辅助发酵加工藏茶的工艺研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1720-1729.
[8]	张志刚, 刘玉芳, 李长城, 李宏, 程平, 杨璐. 不同成熟度对杏果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1402-1408.
[9]	齐振宇, 蔡溧聪, 胡卫珍, 蔡盼, 张龙平, 任艳云, 周艳虹. 水肥一体化模式中化肥减施与不同基追肥比例对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.
[10]	李菊, 颉博杰, 魏守辉, 张国斌, 武玥, 唐中祺, 肖雪梅, 郁继华. 有机肥与化肥配施对松花菜花球营养品质和挥发性物质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1199-1211.
[11]	黄书超, 侯栋, 岳宏忠, 孔维萍, 张东琴, 李亚莉, 撖冬荣, 颉博杰. 三株促生菌及其混合微生物菌剂对莴笋生长和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1212-1221.
[12]	田玉潭, 马露, 刘军, 李冬冬, 陶迎梅, 赵晓璐, 马亚男, 孙少忆, 刘敦华. 葡萄酒渣多酚-壳聚糖-CMC可食性复合膜在水煮羊肉贮藏中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 1095-1103.
[13]	王玲玲, 吴文革, 李瑞, 胡健, 闫素辉, 邵庆勤, 许峰, 张从宇, 周永进, 李文阳. 施氮量对弱筋小麦籽粒品质与氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 777-784.
[14]	王英珍, 潘芝梅. 二十二份毛花猕猴桃种质资源果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 825-830.
[15]	李清斌, 秦奔奔, 李盈盈, 范凯锋, 杨栋, 陈磊, 刘鹍. 连阴雨寡日照对大棚草莓小气候、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 831-839.