浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 225-234.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230213
• 农业经济与发展 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2023-02-22
出版日期:
2024-01-25
发布日期:
2024-02-18
作者简介:
魏超(1997—),男,山东昌乐人,博士研究生,研究方向为农业保险。E-mail:18853859250@163.com
通讯作者:
* 陈盛伟,E-mail:chensw@sdau.edu.cn
基金资助:
WEI Chao1(), CHEN Shengwei2,*(
), NIU Hao1, LI Zheng1
Received:
2023-02-22
Online:
2024-01-25
Published:
2024-02-18
摘要:
基于2008—2020年中国除港澳台藏外30个省份的面板数据,利用固定效应模型、Ⅳ-2SLS法等工具,探讨农业保险保障水平对农业收入的影响效果及机制路径。研究发现,农业保险保障水平与农业收入间存在显著且稳健的“倒U型”关系,拐点值为农业保险保障水平等于83.09%。农业产业融合在农业保险保障水平促进农业增收的机制中发挥了部分中介效应,中介效应占比为82.24%。据此建议加快农险产品创新和保险责任扩充,推动农业保险“增品、提标、扩面”,为农业增收提供全面的风险保障。
中图分类号:
魏超, 陈盛伟, 牛浩, 李政. 农业保险保障水平与农业收入的“倒U型”关系——基于农业产业融合视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 225-234.
WEI Chao, CHEN Shengwei, NIU Hao, LI Zheng. An “inverted U-shaped” relationship between agricultural insurance coverage level and agricultural income: from perspective of agricultural industry integration[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 225-234.
一级指标 Level Ⅰ indicators | 二级指标 Level Ⅱ indicators | 性质 Nature |
---|---|---|
农业产业链延伸 Extension of agricultural industry chain | 农副食品加工业营业收入/农林牧渔业总产值 Operating income of agricultural and sideline food processing industry/total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | + |
农村每万人拥有的农林牧渔业法人单位数 Number of legal entities of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery per 10 000 persons in rural areas | + | |
第一产业总产值/第一产业就业人员数 Total output value of the primary industry/number of employees in the primary industry | + | |
农业多功能性扩展 Multi-functional expansion | 农用化肥使用量/农作物播种总面积 Amount of agricultural chemical fertilizer used/total planting area of crops | - |
of agriculture | 农药使用量/农作物播种总面积 Pesticide usage/total planting area of crops | - |
温室总面积/第一产业就业人员数 Total greenhouse area/number of employees in the primary industry | + | |
水土流失治理和除涝面积/农作物播种总面积 Soil erosion control and waterlogging removal area/total planting area of crops | + | |
粮食产量/第一产业就业人员数 Grain output/number of employees in the primary industry | + | |
农业与服务业融合 Integration of agriculture and service industry | 农林牧渔服务业产值/农林牧渔业总产值 Output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery services/total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | + |
社会消费品乡村零售额/乡村人口数 Rural retail sales of social consumer goods/rural population | + | |
公路通车里程数/总人口Road mileage/total population | + |
表1 农业产业融合综合评价体系
Table 1 Comprehensive evaluation system of agricultural industry integration
一级指标 Level Ⅰ indicators | 二级指标 Level Ⅱ indicators | 性质 Nature |
---|---|---|
农业产业链延伸 Extension of agricultural industry chain | 农副食品加工业营业收入/农林牧渔业总产值 Operating income of agricultural and sideline food processing industry/total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | + |
农村每万人拥有的农林牧渔业法人单位数 Number of legal entities of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery per 10 000 persons in rural areas | + | |
第一产业总产值/第一产业就业人员数 Total output value of the primary industry/number of employees in the primary industry | + | |
农业多功能性扩展 Multi-functional expansion | 农用化肥使用量/农作物播种总面积 Amount of agricultural chemical fertilizer used/total planting area of crops | - |
of agriculture | 农药使用量/农作物播种总面积 Pesticide usage/total planting area of crops | - |
温室总面积/第一产业就业人员数 Total greenhouse area/number of employees in the primary industry | + | |
水土流失治理和除涝面积/农作物播种总面积 Soil erosion control and waterlogging removal area/total planting area of crops | + | |
粮食产量/第一产业就业人员数 Grain output/number of employees in the primary industry | + | |
农业与服务业融合 Integration of agriculture and service industry | 农林牧渔服务业产值/农林牧渔业总产值 Output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery services/total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery | + |
社会消费品乡村零售额/乡村人口数 Rural retail sales of social consumer goods/rural population | + | |
公路通车里程数/总人口Road mileage/total population | + |
变量 Variable | 符号 Symbol | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
农业经营净收入Agricultural operation income | I | 9.121 | 6.380 | 8.213 | 0.465 |
农业保险保障水平Agricultural insurance coverage level | S | 1.163 | 0.004 | 0.296 | 0.303 |
农业产业融合指数Agricultural industry integration index | N | 0.463 | 0.077 | 0.266 | 0.066 |
支农力度Agricultural support | F | 2.075 | 0.042 | 0.233 | 0.275 |
产业结构Industrial structure | T | 0.472 | 0.007 | 0.180 | 0.093 |
自然灾害Natural disaster | R | 0.373 | 0 | 0.087 | 0.075 |
农村固定投资Rural fixed investment | V | 1.384 | 0.005 | 0.209 | 0.172 |
受益率Benefit rate | B | 14.934 | 0 | 0.276 | 0.796 |
表2 变量的描述性统计
Table 2 Descriptive statistics of variables
变量 Variable | 符号 Symbol | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
农业经营净收入Agricultural operation income | I | 9.121 | 6.380 | 8.213 | 0.465 |
农业保险保障水平Agricultural insurance coverage level | S | 1.163 | 0.004 | 0.296 | 0.303 |
农业产业融合指数Agricultural industry integration index | N | 0.463 | 0.077 | 0.266 | 0.066 |
支农力度Agricultural support | F | 2.075 | 0.042 | 0.233 | 0.275 |
产业结构Industrial structure | T | 0.472 | 0.007 | 0.180 | 0.093 |
自然灾害Natural disaster | R | 0.373 | 0 | 0.087 | 0.075 |
农村固定投资Rural fixed investment | V | 1.384 | 0.005 | 0.209 | 0.172 |
受益率Benefit rate | B | 14.934 | 0 | 0.276 | 0.796 |
变量 Variable | 回归1 Regression 1 | 回归2 Regression 2 |
---|---|---|
S | 0.637*** (10.95) | 1.607*** (11.02) |
S2 | — | -0.967*** (-7.17) |
F | -0.029 (-0.38) | 0.238*** (2.94) |
T | -5.509*** (-8.29) | -4.103*** (-6.29) |
R | -1.183*** (-7.09) | -0.983*** (-6.21) |
V | 0.364*** (4.09) | 0.126 (1.41) |
B | 0.026** (1.99) | 0.032** (2.55) |
常数项 Constant | 8.608*** (111.01) | 8.320*** (100.32) |
n | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.635 | 0.681 |
VIF | 1.36 | 4.55 |
F值F value | 102.59*** | 107.79*** |
Hausman检验Hausman test | 81.66*** | 76.91*** |
表3 基准回归结果
Table 3 Benchmark regression results
变量 Variable | 回归1 Regression 1 | 回归2 Regression 2 |
---|---|---|
S | 0.637*** (10.95) | 1.607*** (11.02) |
S2 | — | -0.967*** (-7.17) |
F | -0.029 (-0.38) | 0.238*** (2.94) |
T | -5.509*** (-8.29) | -4.103*** (-6.29) |
R | -1.183*** (-7.09) | -0.983*** (-6.21) |
V | 0.364*** (4.09) | 0.126 (1.41) |
B | 0.026** (1.99) | 0.032** (2.55) |
常数项 Constant | 8.608*** (111.01) | 8.320*** (100.32) |
n | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.635 | 0.681 |
VIF | 1.36 | 4.55 |
F值F value | 102.59*** | 107.79*** |
Hausman检验Hausman test | 81.66*** | 76.91*** |
变量 Variable | 回归3 Regression 3 | 回归4 Regression 4 |
---|---|---|
S | 1.732*** (8.14) | 2.883*** (9.99) |
S2 | — | -2.061*** (-8.09) |
F | -0.837*** (-4.07) | 0.411*** (3.02) |
T | -3.888*** (-3.08) | -2.249** (-2.04) |
R | -0.820*** (-3.07) | -0.699*** (-3.60) |
V | 0.023 (0.16) | -0.198* (-1.81) |
B | 0.031** (2.53) | 0.039*** (2.79) |
n | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.269 | 0.612 |
F值F value | 63.79*** | 81.43*** |
KP-LM检验KP-LM test | 41.068*** | 60.745*** |
KP-F检验KP-F test | 33.586 | 53.816 |
Hansen-J检验Hansen-J test | 0.565 | 0.465 |
表4 内生性处理的估计结果
Table 4 Estimation results of endogenous treatment
变量 Variable | 回归3 Regression 3 | 回归4 Regression 4 |
---|---|---|
S | 1.732*** (8.14) | 2.883*** (9.99) |
S2 | — | -2.061*** (-8.09) |
F | -0.837*** (-4.07) | 0.411*** (3.02) |
T | -3.888*** (-3.08) | -2.249** (-2.04) |
R | -0.820*** (-3.07) | -0.699*** (-3.60) |
V | 0.023 (0.16) | -0.198* (-1.81) |
B | 0.031** (2.53) | 0.039*** (2.79) |
n | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.269 | 0.612 |
F值F value | 63.79*** | 81.43*** |
KP-LM检验KP-LM test | 41.068*** | 60.745*** |
KP-F检验KP-F test | 33.586 | 53.816 |
Hansen-J检验Hansen-J test | 0.565 | 0.465 |
变量 Variable | 回归5 Regression 5 | 回归6 Regression 6 | 回归7 Regression 7 | 回归8 Regression 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|
S | — | — | 0.624*** (12.95) | 1.502*** (10.51) |
S2 | — | — | — | -0.784*** (-6.48) |
S1 | 0.628*** (8.57) | 1.454*** (12.56) | — | — |
— | -0.574*** (-8.72) | — | — | |
F | 0.108 (1.39) | 0.093 (1.33) | — | — |
T | -6.181*** (-8.89) | -5.354*** (-8.39) | -5.510*** (-8.30) | -4.361*** (-6.68) |
R | -1.155*** (-6.54) | -1.012*** (-6.27) | -1.182*** (-7.10) | -1.023*** (-6.41) |
V | 0.438*** (4.72) | 0.270*** (3.12) | 0.364*** (4.10) | 0.170* (1.91) |
B | 0.023 (1.62) | 0.023* (1.81) | 0.026** (1.98) | 0.032** (2.53) |
常数项 Constant | 8.694*** (107.72) | 8.528*** (112.61) | 8.605*** (111.70) | 8.394*** (105.09) |
n | 390 | 390 | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.595 | 0.667 | 0.635 | 0.673 |
VIF | 1.41 | 2.24 | 1.10 | 4.42 |
F值 | 86.72*** | 100.98*** | 123.38*** | 121.68*** |
F value | ||||
Hausman检验 | 90.95*** | 99.17*** | 57.14*** | 45.76*** |
Hausman test |
表5 稳健性检验结果
Table 5 Robustness test results
变量 Variable | 回归5 Regression 5 | 回归6 Regression 6 | 回归7 Regression 7 | 回归8 Regression 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|
S | — | — | 0.624*** (12.95) | 1.502*** (10.51) |
S2 | — | — | — | -0.784*** (-6.48) |
S1 | 0.628*** (8.57) | 1.454*** (12.56) | — | — |
— | -0.574*** (-8.72) | — | — | |
F | 0.108 (1.39) | 0.093 (1.33) | — | — |
T | -6.181*** (-8.89) | -5.354*** (-8.39) | -5.510*** (-8.30) | -4.361*** (-6.68) |
R | -1.155*** (-6.54) | -1.012*** (-6.27) | -1.182*** (-7.10) | -1.023*** (-6.41) |
V | 0.438*** (4.72) | 0.270*** (3.12) | 0.364*** (4.10) | 0.170* (1.91) |
B | 0.023 (1.62) | 0.023* (1.81) | 0.026** (1.98) | 0.032** (2.53) |
常数项 Constant | 8.694*** (107.72) | 8.528*** (112.61) | 8.605*** (111.70) | 8.394*** (105.09) |
n | 390 | 390 | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.595 | 0.667 | 0.635 | 0.673 |
VIF | 1.41 | 2.24 | 1.10 | 4.42 |
F值 | 86.72*** | 100.98*** | 123.38*** | 121.68*** |
F value | ||||
Hausman检验 | 90.95*** | 99.17*** | 57.14*** | 45.76*** |
Hausman test |
变量 Variable | 回归9 Regression 9 | 回归10 Regression 10 |
---|---|---|
S | 0.064*** (6.60) | 0.419*** (8.31) |
N | — | 3.401*** (13.17) |
F | -0.010 (-0.76) | 0.005 (0.08) |
T | -0.304*** (-3.17) | -4.216*** (-7.61) |
R | -0.101*** (-3.61) | -0.818*** (-5.87) |
V | 0.077*** (5.20) | 0.129* (1.72) |
B | 0.002 (0.74) | 0.023** (2.06) |
常数项 Constant | 0.272*** (18.89) | 7.648*** (79.06) |
n | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.375 | 0.755 |
VIF | 1.36 | 1.39 |
F值F value | — | 155.59*** |
Wald检验Wald test | 212.05*** | — |
Hausman检验Hausman test | 11.97 | 83.40*** |
Bootstrap检验 Bootstrap test | — | 0.088*** (3.08) [0.032, 0.145] |
表6 中介效应检验结果
Table 6 Mesomeric effect test results
变量 Variable | 回归9 Regression 9 | 回归10 Regression 10 |
---|---|---|
S | 0.064*** (6.60) | 0.419*** (8.31) |
N | — | 3.401*** (13.17) |
F | -0.010 (-0.76) | 0.005 (0.08) |
T | -0.304*** (-3.17) | -4.216*** (-7.61) |
R | -0.101*** (-3.61) | -0.818*** (-5.87) |
V | 0.077*** (5.20) | 0.129* (1.72) |
B | 0.002 (0.74) | 0.023** (2.06) |
常数项 Constant | 0.272*** (18.89) | 7.648*** (79.06) |
n | 390 | 390 |
R2 | 0.375 | 0.755 |
VIF | 1.36 | 1.39 |
F值F value | — | 155.59*** |
Wald检验Wald test | 212.05*** | — |
Hausman检验Hausman test | 11.97 | 83.40*** |
Bootstrap检验 Bootstrap test | — | 0.088*** (3.08) [0.032, 0.145] |
[1] | 2022年农民收入结构:工资性收入占41.96%,财产净收入占2.53%[EB/OL]. (2023-02-14) [2023-02-22]. https://finance.sina.com.cn/jjxw/2023-02-14/doc-imyfrvfw9214640.shtml. |
[2] | 何秀荣. 小康社会农民收入问题与增收途径[J]. 河北学刊, 2021, 41(5): 147-157. |
HE X R. Farmers’ income problems and ways to increase income in a well-off society[J]. Hebei Academic Journal, 2021, 41(5): 147-157. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 丁少群, 张珏, 李丹. 乡村振兴背景下农业巨灾风险分散机制完善研究[J]. 理论探索, 2021(5): 96-104. |
DING S Q, ZHANG J, LI D. The improvement of agricultural catastrophe risk dispersion mechanism under the background of rural revitalization[J]. Theoretical Exploration, 2021(5): 96-104. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 庹国柱, 张峭. 论我国农业保险的政策目标[J]. 保险研究, 2018(7): 7-15. |
TUO G Z, ZHANG Q. On the policy objectives of agricultural insurance in China[J]. Insurance Studies, 2018(7): 7-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 冯文丽, 苏晓鹏. 农业保险助推乡村振兴战略实施的制度约束与改革[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020, 41(4): 82-88. |
FENG W L, SU X P. Agricultural insurance promoting rural revitalization strategy: institutional constraints and reform[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, 41(4): 82-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 任天驰, 杨汭华. 高保障高收入: 农业保险保障水平的收入效应研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2022(12): 115-130. |
REN T C, YANG R H. High security and high income? : research on the income effect of agricultural insurance level[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2022(12): 115-130. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 黄颖, 吕德宏. 农业保险、要素配置与农民收入[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(2): 41-53. |
HUANG Y, LV D H. Agricultural insurance, factor allocation and farmer income[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 2021, 20(2): 41-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 马九杰, 崔恒瑜, 吴本健. 政策性农业保险推广对农民收入的增进效应与作用路径解析: 对渐进性试点的准自然实验研究[J]. 保险研究, 2020(2): 3-18. |
MA J J, CUI H Y, WU B J. Analysis of the effect and mechanism of policy-oriented agricultural insurance’s promotion on farmers’ income:a quasi-natural experimental research on progressive pilots[J]. Insurance Studies, 2020(2): 3-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 韩旭东, 刘爽, 王若男, 等. 农业保险对家庭经营收入的影响效果: 基于全国三类农户调查的实证分析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(6): 946-956. |
HAN X D, LIU S, WANG R N, et al. The impacts of crop insurance on rural household income: an empirical analysis based on a survey data of three types of rural households[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2020, 41(6): 946-956. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 郭军, 纪安, 彭超. 农业保险排斥对农民收入的影响: 基于倾向值匹配的异质性研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(2): 80-89. |
GUO J, JI A, PENG C. Effect from exclusion of agricultural insurance on farmers’ income in China:a heterogeneity analysis based on PSM method[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2021(2): 80-89. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | BABCOCK B A, HENNESSY D A. Input demand under yield and revenue insurance[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1996, 78(2): 416-427. |
[12] | 祝仲坤, 陶建平. 农业保险对农户收入的影响机理及经验研究[J]. 农村经济, 2015(2): 67-71. |
ZHU Z K, TAO J P. Study on the mechanism and experience of agricultural insurance’s influence on farmers’ income[J]. Rural Economy, 2015(2): 67-71. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 施红. 生猪保险对农户收入的稳定效应研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2016, 46(2): 126-135. |
SHI H. Hedging effect of hog insurance on farmer’s revenue[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2016, 46(2): 126-135. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 费清, 江生忠, 丁宁. 技术进步、保险保障与农民收入: 基于东中西部地区地级单位的面板GMM方法[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2018, 39(4): 100-104. |
FEI Q, JIANG S Z, DING N. Technological progress, insurance guarantee and farmers’ income:based on data of prefecture level units in the eastern, middle and western regions with panel GMM method[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2018, 39(4): 100-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 周稳海, 赵桂玲, 尹成远. 农业保险发展对农民收入影响的动态研究: 基于面板系统GMM模型的实证检验[J]. 保险研究, 2014(5): 21-30. |
ZHOU W H, ZHAO G L, YIN C Y. A dynamic study about the effect of agricultural insurance on farmers’ income:an empirical analysis based on the panel SYS-GMM model[J]. Insurance Studies, 2014(5): 21-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 高康, 何蒲明. 农业保险能保障农民收入吗? : 基于情景依赖下的保险失效与有效研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2296-2309. |
GAO K, HE P M. Can agricultural insurance guarantee farmer’s income: study on insurance failure and effectiveness based on situational dependence[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2296-2309. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 石文香, 陈盛伟. 农业保险促进了农民增收吗? : 基于省级面板门槛模型的实证检验[J]. 经济体制改革, 2019(2): 84-91. |
SHI W X, CHEN S W. Has agricultural insurance promoted peasants’ income in China?: an empirical analysis based on province panel threshold model[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2019(2): 84-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 毛慧, 胡蓉, 周力, 等. 农业保险、信贷与农户绿色农业技术采用行为: 基于植棉农户的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2022(11): 95-111. |
MAO H, HU R, ZHOU L, et al. Crop insurance and the farmers’ adoption of green technology: empirical analysis based on cotton farmers[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2022(11): 95-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 任天驰, 张洪振, 杨晓慧, 等. 农业保险保障水平与农户生产投资:一个“倒U型”关系: 基于鄂、赣、川、滇四省调查数据[J]. 中国农村观察, 2021(5): 128-144. |
REN T C, ZHANG H Z, YANG X H, et al. Agricultural insurance security level and farmers’ production investment: evidence from the survey data of Hubei, Jiangxi, Sichuan and Yunnan provinces[J]. China Rural Survey, 2021(5): 128-144. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 陈红霞, 屈玥鹏. 基于竞争优势培育的农村一二三产业融合的内生机制研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(S1): 58-64. |
CHEN H X, QU Y P. Research on the endogenous mechanism of the rural industrial convergence based on cultivation of competitive advantage[J]. China Soft Science, 2020(S1): 58-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 江泽林. 农村一二三产业融合发展再探索[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(6): 8-18. |
JIANG Z L. Re-exploration of the integration and development of primary, secondary and tertiary industries in rural areas[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(6): 8-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 冯文丽, 梁瑞. 农业保险服务农业全产业链的探索与思考[J]. 中国保险, 2022(2): 28-30. |
FENG W L, LIANG R. Exploration and thinking on agricultural insurance serving the whole agricultural industry chain[J]. China Insurance, 2022(2): 28-30. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 李晓龙, 冉光和. 农村产业融合发展如何影响城乡收入差距: 基于农村经济增长与城镇化的双重视角[J]. 农业技术经济, 2019(8): 17-28. |
LI X L, RAN G H. How does the rural industrial convergence development affect the urban-rural income gap?: based on the dual perspective of rural economic growth and urbanization[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2019(8): 17-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 谭燕芝, 姚海琼. 农村产业融合发展的农户增收效应研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2021, 33(9): 91-102. |
TAN Y Z, YAO H Q. Research on the impact of rural industrial integration on farmers’ income increase[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2021, 33(9): 91-102. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 孙永朋, 徐萍, 毛文琳, 王美青, 王宇晗. 浙江农民收入结构优化、均衡增长的对策研究——基于县域数据的实证分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2742-2750. |
[2] | 张文斐. 农业自然资源资产监管模式的法经济学分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2265-2274. |
[3] | 韦小良, 王英. 基于旅游凝视理论的共同富裕背景下乡村旅游资源开发研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1950-1959. |
[4] | 张婉君, 朱利中, 陈丁江, 吴东雷, 王飞儿, 张清宇. 乡村环境治理现代化水平评价:以2019年为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 913-921. |
[5] | 曾小春, 李随成, 史官清, 邢泽宇. “双碳”目标背景下基于熵权TOPSIS法的区域农业高质量发展水平综合评价——基于变化速度特征视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 962-972. |
[6] | 张艳彬, 耿槟, 梁颖, 许调娟, 徐保根, 曾新, 张悦悦. “标准地”政策促进现代农业产业高质量发展的作用机制研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 688-697. |
[7] | 王宁柯, 张瑞, 章胜勇. 机械化服务程度和农地经营规模对玉米生产效率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 698-707. |
[8] | 王萍萍. 土地确权对农业生产率的影响——基于中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)的双重差分研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 455-467. |
[9] | 王博, 陈秋霖, 万晶晶. 新发展阶段乡村发展的时空逻辑与突破方向[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 468-476. |
[10] | 罗海平, 潘柳欣, 胡学英, 刘祖光. 我国粮食主产区耕地利用变化的粮食与生态效应研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 226-237. |
[11] | 李宝值, 卓妮, 黄河啸, 朱奇彪. 基于绿色发展理念的浙江“26县”政策对城乡收入差距的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 238-248. |
[12] | 魏政, 曹光乔. 城市化有利于农业机械化吗?——基于中国县域面板数据的实证分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2778-2788. |
[13] | 刘恩玲, 罗小锋, 杜三峡, 闫阿倩, 王祥礼. 老龄化、种植目的与稻农化学农药减量[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2789-2799. |
[14] | 高雪萍, 张予涵, 张梦玲, 廖文梅. 互联网信息技术使用对农业生产率的影响分析——以江西省水稻种植户为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2809-2822. |
[15] | 卢静宜, 向科衡. “新农人”乡村文旅创业驱动因素与组合路径构型探究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 2553-2566. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||