浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 2376-2386.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20241129
收稿日期:2024-12-30
出版日期:2025-11-25
发布日期:2025-12-08
作者简介:杨锦皓(1999—),男,云南昆明人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业机械设计、结构分析。E-mail:2420465039@qq.com
通讯作者:
*江洁,E-mail:57224911@qq.com
基金资助:
YANG Jinhao1(
), JIANG Jie2,3,*(
), LIU Hang1, LI Fuqiang1
Received:2024-12-30
Online:2025-11-25
Published:2025-12-08
摘要:
为解决云南地区水稻旱播作业中精量成穴与覆膜后排种的技术需求,本研究旨在设计一款与之相适应的排种器。首先,测量稻种的三轴尺寸,计算出稻种密度为1 036 kg·m-3;使用万能试验机进行压缩试验,测得稻种的泊松比为0.30、剪切模量为108 MPa。进而,选用尼龙-66作为排种器材料,搭建物理实验台,获得稻种与尼龙-66的碰撞恢复系数为0.48、静摩擦系数为0.53、滚动摩擦系数为0.07。然后,采用离散元法建立稻种模型,并基于EDEM与Design-Expert软件对种子间接触参数进行标定,获得最优稻种间接触参数组合(碰撞恢复系数0.34、静摩擦系数0.66、滚动摩擦系数0.078)。以此为基础,设计排种器,开展排种器取种与排种过程的仿真分析,确定排种器的较优转速为90~110(°)·s-1。采用尼龙-66材料制作排种器并搭建排种试验台进行验证。试验结果表明,该排种器在成穴性能与刺膜播种效果方面均表现良好,能够满足水稻旱播的农艺要求。
中图分类号:
杨锦皓, 江洁, 刘行, 李福强. 基于离散元法的水稻种子参数标定与旱作排种仿真[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(11): 2376-2386.
YANG Jinhao, JIANG Jie, LIU Hang, LI Fuqiang. Calibration of rice seed parameters and simulation of dry direct-seeding based on the discrete element method[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(11): 2376-2386.
| 尺寸 Size | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 长Length | 9.72 | 8.44 | 9.18 |
| 宽Width | 2.90 | 2.46 | 2.66 |
| 厚Thickness | 2.24 | 1.70 | 2.00 |
表1 稻种的三轴尺寸
Table 1 Triaxial size of rice seeds mm
| 尺寸 Size | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Average value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 长Length | 9.72 | 8.44 | 9.18 |
| 宽Width | 2.90 | 2.46 | 2.66 |
| 厚Thickness | 2.24 | 1.70 | 2.00 |
图1 万能试验机单轴压缩试验图 1,万能试验机平板压头;2,试验稻种。
Fig.1 Uniaxial compression test of universal testing machine 1, The flat test head of the universal testing machine; 2, Test rice seed.
图3 静摩擦系数试验台 1为倾角仪;2为稻种;3为尼龙板;θ为稻种滑动时倾角仪角度。
Fig.3 Test bench for coefficient of static friction 1 is the inclinometer; 2 is the rice seed; 3 is the nylon plate; θ is the angle of the inclinometer when the rice seed slides.
图4 滚动摩擦因素试验台 1为倾角仪;2为尼龙板;3为稻种球。Y代表稻种球初始高度;X代表稻种球在斜板上滚动的位移;L代表稻种球在平板上滚动的位移;β代表斜板倾角,(°)。
Fig.4 Rolling friction factor test bench 1 is the inclinometer; 2 is the nylon plate; 3 is the rice seed ball. Y denotes the initial height of the rice seed ball; X indicates the displacement of the rice seed ball rolling on the inclined plate; L represents the displacement of the rice seed ball rolling on the flat plate; β denotes the inclination angle of the inclined plate, (°).
| 序号 No. | 左侧角度 Left side angle/(°) | 右侧角度 Right side angle/(°) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.28 | 32.17 |
| 2 | 32.52 | 32.65 |
| 3 | 31.84 | 31.45 |
| 4 | 31.52 | 32.58 |
| 5 | 32.24 | 32.92 |
| 6 | 32.16 | 29.91 |
| 7 | 32.00 | 31.70 |
| 8 | 30.84 | 32.48 |
| 9 | 32.63 | 32.26 |
| 10 | 31.23 | 31.70 |
| 平均Average | 31.93 | 31.98 |
表2 堆积角度表
Table 2 Stacking angle table
| 序号 No. | 左侧角度 Left side angle/(°) | 右侧角度 Right side angle/(°) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.28 | 32.17 |
| 2 | 32.52 | 32.65 |
| 3 | 31.84 | 31.45 |
| 4 | 31.52 | 32.58 |
| 5 | 32.24 | 32.92 |
| 6 | 32.16 | 29.91 |
| 7 | 32.00 | 31.70 |
| 8 | 30.84 | 32.48 |
| 9 | 32.63 | 32.26 |
| 10 | 31.23 | 31.70 |
| 平均Average | 31.93 | 31.98 |
| 参数 Parameter | 低水平(-1) Low(-1) | 高水平(+1) High(+1) |
|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.30 | 0.80 |
| X2 | 0.25 | 0.80 |
| X3 | 0.30 | 0.13 |
| X4 | 0.30 | 0.60 |
| X5 | 0.30 | 0.75 |
| X6 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
表3 B-P筛选试验参数
Table 3 Plackett-Burman test parameters
| 参数 Parameter | 低水平(-1) Low(-1) | 高水平(+1) High(+1) |
|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.30 | 0.80 |
| X2 | 0.25 | 0.80 |
| X3 | 0.30 | 0.13 |
| X4 | 0.30 | 0.60 |
| X5 | 0.30 | 0.75 |
| X6 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| 序号No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 8.16 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 38.21 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 33.24 |
| 4 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 13.26 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1. | -1 | 1 | 27.53 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 17.58 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 40.93 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 21.15 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 37.93 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 19.07 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 26.34 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 14.83 |
表4 B-P筛选试验与结果
Table 4 Plackett-Burman tests and results
| 序号No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 8.16 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 38.21 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 33.24 |
| 4 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 13.26 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1. | -1 | 1 | 27.53 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 17.58 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 40.93 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 21.15 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 37.93 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 19.07 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 26.34 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 14.83 |
| 参数 Parameter | 效应 Effect | 均方和 Sum of square | 影响率 Impact rate/% | 显著性排序 Sgnificant sorting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 2.555 00 | 19.584 10 | 1.475 27 | 5 |
| X2 | 4.911 67 | 72.373 40 | 5.451 91 | 4 |
| X3 | 0.268 333 | 0.216 00 | 0.016 27 | 6 |
| X4 | -5.418 33 | 88.075 00 | 6.634 71 | 3 |
| X5 | 16.228 30 | 790.076 00 | 59.576 70 | 1 |
| X6 | 9.795 00 | 287.826 00 | 21.682 00 | 2 |
表5 B-P筛选试验参数的显著性分析
Table 5 Significance analysis of Plackett-Burman test parameters
| 参数 Parameter | 效应 Effect | 均方和 Sum of square | 影响率 Impact rate/% | 显著性排序 Sgnificant sorting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 2.555 00 | 19.584 10 | 1.475 27 | 5 |
| X2 | 4.911 67 | 72.373 40 | 5.451 91 | 4 |
| X3 | 0.268 333 | 0.216 00 | 0.016 27 | 6 |
| X4 | -5.418 33 | 88.075 00 | 6.634 71 | 3 |
| X5 | 16.228 30 | 790.076 00 | 59.576 70 | 1 |
| X6 | 9.795 00 | 287.826 00 | 21.682 00 | 2 |
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.65 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 13.17 | 58.79 |
| 2 | 0.55 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 23.34 | 26.95 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 27.21 | 14.85 |
| 4 | 0.35 | 0.70 | 0.08 | 31.71 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 35.18 | 10.09 |
表6 最陡爬坡试验
Table 6 Steepest climb test
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ/(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.65 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 13.17 | 58.79 |
| 2 | 0.55 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 23.34 | 26.95 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 27.21 | 14.85 |
| 4 | 0.35 | 0.70 | 0.08 | 31.71 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 35.18 | 10.09 |
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ /(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 34.26 | 7.23 |
| 2 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 32.26 | 2.18 |
| 3 | 1 | 0. | 1 | 32.57 | 1.94 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.71 | 5.49 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 31.64 | 0.99 |
| 6 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 34.01 | 6.43 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.14 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 29.57 | 7.46 |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 34.57 | 8.18 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.74 | 2.47 |
| 11 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 31.84 | 0.36 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.51 | 1.39 |
| 13 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 30.06 | 5.93 |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 27.33 | 14.46 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.66 | 0.91 |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 29.98 | 6.17 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.18 | 0.70 |
表7 响应面(B-B)试验设计方案与结果
Table 7 Box-Behnken trial design and results
| 序号No. | X4 | X5 | X6 | ϑ /(°) | ξ /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 34.26 | 7.23 |
| 2 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 32.26 | 2.18 |
| 3 | 1 | 0. | 1 | 32.57 | 1.94 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.71 | 5.49 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 31.64 | 0.99 |
| 6 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 34.01 | 6.43 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.14 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 29.57 | 7.46 |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 34.57 | 8.18 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.74 | 2.47 |
| 11 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 31.84 | 0.36 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.51 | 1.39 |
| 13 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 30.06 | 5.93 |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 27.33 | 14.46 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.66 | 0.91 |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 29.98 | 6.17 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.18 | 0.70 |
| 来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 54.510 0 | 9 | 6.060 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4 | 2.700 0 | 1 | 2.700 0 | 0.003 4 |
| X5 | 19.910 0 | 1 | 19.910 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X6 | 26.830 0 | 1 | 26.830 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4X5 | 0.970 2 | 1 | 0.970 2 | 0.035 1 |
| X4X6 | 0.921 6 | 1 | 0.921 6 | 0.038 7 |
| X5X6 | 1.330 0 | 1 | 1.330 0 | 0.018 4 |
| 0.457 1 | 1 | 0.457 1 | 0.116 8 | |
| 0.036 4 | 1 | 0.036 4 | 0.629 1 | |
| 1.420 0 | 1 | 1.420 0 | 0.016 1 | |
| 残差Residual | 1.000 0 | 7 | ||
| 失拟项Lack of fit | 0.055 3 | 3 | 0.078 1 | 0.968 5 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.944 7 | 4 | 0.236 2 | |
| 总和Cor total | 55.510 0 | 16 |
表8 响应面(B-B)试验模型方差分析
Table 8 Analysis of variance of the Box-Behnken test model
| 来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 54.510 0 | 9 | 6.060 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4 | 2.700 0 | 1 | 2.700 0 | 0.003 4 |
| X5 | 19.910 0 | 1 | 19.910 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X6 | 26.830 0 | 1 | 26.830 0 | <0.000 1 |
| X4X5 | 0.970 2 | 1 | 0.970 2 | 0.035 1 |
| X4X6 | 0.921 6 | 1 | 0.921 6 | 0.038 7 |
| X5X6 | 1.330 0 | 1 | 1.330 0 | 0.018 4 |
| 0.457 1 | 1 | 0.457 1 | 0.116 8 | |
| 0.036 4 | 1 | 0.036 4 | 0.629 1 | |
| 1.420 0 | 1 | 1.420 0 | 0.016 1 | |
| 残差Residual | 1.000 0 | 7 | ||
| 失拟项Lack of fit | 0.055 3 | 3 | 0.078 1 | 0.968 5 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.944 7 | 4 | 0.236 2 | |
| 总和Cor total | 55.510 0 | 16 |
| 尺寸 Size/mm | 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | 60 | 68 |
| 90 | 71 | |
| 120 | 74 | |
| 9.7 | 60 | 76 |
| 90 | 81 | |
| 120 | 83 | |
| 1.0 | 60 | 70 |
| 90 | 73 | |
| 120 | 73 |
表9 取种槽优化仿真试验
Table 9 Optimization simulation test of seed trough
| 尺寸 Size/mm | 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | 60 | 68 |
| 90 | 71 | |
| 120 | 74 | |
| 9.7 | 60 | 76 |
| 90 | 81 | |
| 120 | 83 | |
| 1.0 | 60 | 70 |
| 90 | 73 | |
| 120 | 73 |
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/ [(°)·s-1] | 2粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 2-seed holes/% | 合格穴占比 Proportion of qualified holes/% | 6粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 6-seed holes/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 2 | 75 | 23 |
| 90 | 5 | 81 | 15 |
| 110 | 7 | 84 | 9 |
| 120 | 12 | 82 | 6 |
表10 排种仿真结果
Table 10 Seeding simulation results
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/ [(°)·s-1] | 2粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 2-seed holes/% | 合格穴占比 Proportion of qualified holes/% | 6粒稻种穴占比 Proportion of 6-seed holes/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 2 | 75 | 23 |
| 90 | 5 | 81 | 15 |
| 110 | 7 | 84 | 9 |
| 120 | 12 | 82 | 6 |
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% | 刺膜合格率 Puncture pass rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | 83 | 95 |
| 100 | 86 | 93 |
| 110 | 86 | 90 |
表11 排种试验结果
Table 11 Results of seed row experiment
| 取种速度 Seed retrieval speed/[(°)·s-1] | 合格穴率 Qualified rate/% | 刺膜合格率 Puncture pass rate/% |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | 83 | 95 |
| 100 | 86 | 93 |
| 110 | 86 | 90 |
| [1] | 沈国春, 魏旭东, 李宏博, 等. 分析水稻旱播水管技术的优点及应用现状[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, 36(6): 122. |
| SHEN G C, WEI X D, LI H B, et al. The advantages and application status of water pipe technology for dry seeding of rice were analyzed[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2016, 36(6): 122. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 牟家宏, 杨发展, 杨云鹏, 等. 基于流固耦合仿真水稻种子建立与参数标定[J]. 农机化研究, 2022, 44(7): 14-20. |
| MOU J H, YANG F Z, YANG Y P, et al. Building and calibration of parameters of rice seeds for fluid-solid coupling simulation[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2022, 44(7): 14-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | REZVANI F, AZARGOSHASB H, JAMIALAHMADI O, et al. Experimental study and CFD simulation of phenol removal by immobilization of soybean seed coat in a packed-bed bioreactor[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 101: 32-43. |
| [4] | HORABIK J, MOLENDA M. Parameters and contact models for DEM simulations of agricultural granular materials: a review[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2016, 147: 206-225. |
| [5] | 鹿芳媛, 马旭, 谭穗妍, 等. 水稻芽种离散元主要接触参数仿真标定与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(2): 93-99. |
| LU F Y, MA X, TAN S Y, et al. Simulative calibration and experiment on main contact parameters of discrete elements for rice bud seeds[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(2): 93-99. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | GONZÁLEZ-MONTELLANO C, FUENTES J M, AYUGA-TÉLLEZ E, et al. Determination of the mechanical properties of maize grains and olives required for use in DEM simulations[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 111(4): 553-562. |
| [7] | COETZEE C J, ELS D N J. Calibration of discrete element parameters and the modelling of silo discharge and bucket filling[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2009, 65(2): 198-212. |
| [8] | 于庆旭, 刘燕, 陈小兵, 等. 基于离散元的三七种子仿真参数标定与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(2): 123-132. |
| YU Q X, LIU Y, CHEN X B, et al. Calibration and experiment of simulation parameters for Panax notoginseng seeds based on DEM[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(2): 123-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 贾富国, 韩燕龙, 刘扬, 等. 稻谷颗粒物料堆积角模拟预测方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(11): 254-260. |
| JIA F G, HAN Y L, LIU Y, et al. Simulation prediction method of repose angle for rice particle materials[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(11): 254-260. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | MIYAMOTO T, NOGUCHI S, MATSUTOMO S. Numerical simulation and experimental verification for rice using distinct element method[M]//XIAO T, ZHANG L, FEI M. Communications in computer and Information Science, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 472-479. |
| [11] | 刘凡一, 张舰, 李博, 等. 基于堆积试验的小麦离散元参数分析及标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(12): 247-253. |
| LIU F Y, ZHANG J, LI B, et al. Calibration of parameters of wheat required in discrete element method simulation based on repose angle of particle heap[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(12): 247-253. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 陈圣家, 金涛, 李志刚, 等. 复杂应力状态下尼龙66力学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2016, 30(S2): 300-303. |
| CHEN S J, JIN T, LI Z G, et al. Mechanical properties of nylon 66 under complex stress[J]. Materials Reports, 2016, 30(S2): 300-303. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | 任文涛, 董滨, 崔红光, 等. 水稻种子与斜面碰撞后运动规律的试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(7): 103-107. |
| REN W T, DONG B, CUI H G, et al. Experiment on the motion characteristics of rice seeds after collision with different slopes[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(7): 103-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 吴孟宸, 丛锦玲, 闫琴, 等. 花生种子颗粒离散元仿真参数标定与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(23): 30-38. |
| WU M C, CONG J L, YAN Q, et al. Calibration and experiments for discrete element simulation parameters of peanut seed particles[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(23): 30-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 张胜伟, 张瑞雨, 陈天佑, 等. 绿豆种子离散元仿真参数标定与排种试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(3): 71-79. |
| ZHANG S W, ZHANG R Y, CHEN T Y, et al. Calibration of simulation parameters of mung bean seeds using discrete element method and verification of seed-metering test[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(3): 71-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 李大鹏. 气力式藜麦精量排种器离散元分析与性能试验研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020. |
| LI D P. Discrete element analysis and performance test of pneumatic Chenopodium wheat precision metering device[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 郑效帅, 何晓宁, 尚书旗, 等. 油莎豆种子籽粒离散元仿真参数标定与试验[J]. 农机化研究, 2024, 46(2): 172-178. |
| ZHENG X S, HE X N, SHANG S Q, et al. Calibration and experiments for discrete element simulation parameters of Cyperus esculentus seeds[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2024, 46(2): 172-178. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 武涛, 黄伟凤, 陈学深, 等. 考虑颗粒间黏结力的黏性土壤离散元模型参数标定[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 93-98. |
| WU T, HUANG W F, CHEN X S, et al. Calibration of discrete element model parameters for cohesive soil considering the cohesion between particles[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(3): 93-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 赵海楠. 面向窝眼轮式排种器优化的水稻种子建模方法研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2024. |
| ZHAO H N. A study on rice-seed modelling method for optimization of hole-wheel seeding metering device[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2024. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 李辉. 水稻覆膜旱直播技术与装备研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021. |
| LI H. Study on technology and equipment for direct-seeded rice using film mulching in dryland[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 任甲辉, 武涛, 刘庆庭, 等. 蔗段离散元仿真建模方法与参数标定[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 124-132. |
| REN J H, WU T, LIU Q T, et al. Discrete element simulation modeling method and parameter calibration of sugarcane segment[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2022, 43(3): 124-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 刘宏俊, 张文毅, 纪要, 等. 基于离散元法的稻麦周年地区土壤仿真物理参数标定[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(12): 153-159. |
| LIU H J, ZHANG W Y, JI Y, et al. Parameter calibration of soil particles in annual rice-wheat region based on discrete element method[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2020, 41(12): 153-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 李勇. U型腔道式水稻精量穴播排种器设计与试验研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021. |
| LI Y. Design and experimental study of U-shaped cavity-type rice precision hole seeding device[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 刘春波. 水稻螺旋槽式排种器旱直播机设计与试验研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2018. |
| LIU C B. Design and experiment of rice spiral groove type distributor drilling machine for dry land[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 铺膜穴播机作业质量: NY/T 987—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006. |
| [1] | 任宁, 俞国红, 郑航, 陈志东. 基于离散元法的茶园土壤参数标定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1353-1359. |
| [2] | 熊厚全, 江洁. 黄色赤红壤与开沟部件互作的离散元参数标定及试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1400-1412. |
| [3] | 孔德, 叶自然, 谭向峰, 代梦迪, 赵先亮, 孔德栋. 生菜种子物理接触参数测定与离散元仿真标定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 932-942. |
| [4] | 彭才望, 周婷, 孙松林, 谢烨林, 魏源. 基于堆积试验的黑水虻离散元仿真参数标定与分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 814-823. |
| [5] | 刘俊, 朱德泉, 于从羊, 薛康, 张顺, 廖娟. 舀勺型孔轮式水稻精量排种器设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 739-752. |
| [6] | 王锋, 张锋伟, 戴飞, 张陆海, 赵伟, 杨小平. 双层平筛式半夏收获机设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1946-1955. |
| [7] | 李为宁, 柏宣丙, 李兵. 滚筒式茶叶提香机结构参数优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 348-358. |
| [8] | 李丽丽, 赵武云, 谭文胜, 王二化. 基于SolidWorks的天然气-柴油双燃料发动机设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(3): 461-469. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||