不同世代生姜组培苗物质生产特性与产量形成差异

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.04.13

浙江农业学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 661-670.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.04.13

不同世代生姜组培苗物质生产特性与产量形成差异

任云, 李强, 李哲馨, 刘奕清, 唐建民^*

重庆经济植物生物技术重点实验室,重庆市特种植物协调创新中心,重庆文理学院特色植物研究院,重庆 402160

收稿日期:2010-10-25 出版日期:2020-04-25 发布日期:2020-04-26
通讯作者: *唐建民,E-mail: 756337153@qq.com
作者简介:任云(1989—),女,湖南常德人,博士,讲师,主要从事园艺植物逆境生理调控。E-mail: 839953291@qq.com
基金资助:
重庆市教委自然科学基金青年基金(KJQN201801330,KJQN201801339); 重庆文理学院科研项目(2017RTZ18)

Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations

REN Yun, LI Qiang, LI Zhexin, LIU Yiqing, TANG Jianmin^*

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing, Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China

Received:2010-10-25 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究不同世代组培生姜物质积累与分配特性及其产量形成差异,以确定组培生姜在生产上的最佳推广世代。以组培生姜原原种(T₁)、原种(T₂)、生产种(T₃)3个世代为试验材料,于2017—2018年进行了大田栽培试验。结果表明:T₃和T₂世代植株生长特性优于T₁,表现为生育前期T₃和T₂株高、茎粗快速增加,地上部快速生长;进入根茎膨大期后,生姜株高和茎粗增长减缓,但分蘖快速发生,由于T₃和T₂的分蘖发生少,保证了根茎光合产物的供给,延长了快速生长期,显著提高了其物质积累,为高产奠定了物质基础。根茎膨大期后,T₃和T₂较低的茎、叶和根系物质分配比例,使光合产物向根茎转移促进了根茎的膨大,从而获得高产。因此,与原原种和原种相比,生姜组培生产种具有明显的产量优势,能够有效提高生姜生产的经济效益。综合考虑不同世代组培生姜产量和经济效益差异与种性退化规律,可以把组培生姜生产种(T₃)作为生产上的最佳推广世代,既能充分发挥其产量潜力提高经济效益,又能有效控制病害的发生。

关键词: 生姜, 世代, 组培, 物质积累与分配, 产量

Abstract: To study the differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue cultured gingers in different generations, and to determine the best promotion generation of tissue cultured ginger in production, tissue cultured original-original seeds (T₁), original seeds (T₂) and production seeds (T₃) were used as experimental materials to conduct a two-year field experiment in 2017-2018. The results showed that the growth characteristics of T₃ and T₂ were significantly better than that of T₁, which showed the plant height and stem diameter of T₃ and T₂ grew rapidly, and ensured the rapid growth of shoot in the early growth stage. After entering the rhizome expansion period, the growth of plant height and stem diameter of ginger slowed down, and tillers occurred rapidly. T₃ and T₂ could effectively control the occurrence of tillering, reduce the consumption of photosynthetic products by excessive tillering, and ensure the supply of photosynthetic products of rhizomes, thereby increased the rate of dry matter accumulation, prolonged the rapid growth period, and significantly increased their dry matter accumulation, laid a material foundation for high yield. After rhizome expansion period, the lower proportion in stem, leaf and root of T₃ and T₂, which promoted the transfer of photosynthetic products to rhizomes and further promoted the expansion of rhizomes, thus achieved high yield. Therefore, compared with the original-original seeds and original seeds, the production seeds of ginger had obvious yield advantages, which could effectively improve the economic benefits of ginger production. Comprehensive considering the yield differences and economic benefits, and seeds degeneration law of tissue cultured ginger, the tissue cultured ginger production seeds (T₃) could be used as the best promotion generation for production, which could realize its yield potential, improve economic benefits and effectively control the occurrence of diseases.

Key words: ginger, generation, tissue culture, matter accumulation and distribution, yield

中图分类号:

S632.5

任云, 李强, 李哲馨, 刘奕清, 唐建民. 不同世代生姜组培苗物质生产特性与产量形成差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 661-670.

REN Yun, LI Qiang, LI Zhexin, LIU Yiqing, TANG Jianmin. Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations[J]. , 2020, 32(4): 661-670.

参考文献

[1] VARAKUMAR S, UMESH K V, SINGHAL R S.Enhanced extraction of oleoresin from ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizome powder using enzyme-assisted three phase partitioning[J]. Food Chemistry, 2017, 216: 27-36.
[2] KRÜGER S, BERGIN A, MORLOCK G E. Effect-directed analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale) and its food products, and quantification of bioactive compounds via high-performance thin-layer chromatography and mass spectrometry[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 243: 258-268.
[3] GAGAOUA M, HOGGAS N, HAFID K.Three phase partitioning of zingibain, a milk-clotting enzyme from Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizomes[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2015, 73: 245-252.
[4] 陈正明, 战博, 杨守正, 等. 农业综合开发支持优势特色产业发展研究: 以重庆市为例[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2016(12): 2-3.
CHEN Z M, ZHAN B, YANG S Z, et al.Research on comprehensive agricultural development supporting the development of dominant and characteristic industries: a case study of Chongqing[J]. Agricultural Development & Equipments, 2016(12): 2-3.(in Chinese)
[5] 李秀, 徐坤, 巩彪. 生姜种质遗传多样性和亲缘关系的SRAP分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(4): 718-726.
LI X, XU K, GONG B.Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of ginger germplasm resources revealed by SRAPs[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(4): 718-726.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] ZHANG N, PAN R H, SHEN Y F, et al.Development of a novel bio-organic fertilizer for plant growth promotion and suppression of rhizome rot in ginger[J]. Biological Control, 2017, 114: 97-105.
[7] 刘贵猛, 谭树朋, 孙文献, 等. AMF和PGPR对生姜青枯病的影响[J]. 菌物研究, 2017, 15(1): 1-7.
LIU G M, TAN S P, SUN W X, et al.Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on bacterial wilt of ginger[J]. Journal of Fungal Research, 2017, 15(1): 1-7.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 王莹, 姜永平, 杨凯. 香沙芋新品种“泰芋一号”脱毒组培技术研究[J]. 现代园艺, 2015(24): 7-8.
WANG Y, JIANG Y P, YANG K.Study on detoxification and tissue culture technology of a new taro variety of “Taiyu 1”[J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2015(24): 7-8.(in Chinese)
[9] 宋伯符, 王胜武, 谢开云, 等. 我国甘薯脱毒研究的现状及展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(6): 43-48.
SONG B F, WANG S W, XIE K Y, et al.Status and prospects of sweetpotato viruses elimination in China[J]. Scientia Agricutura Sinica, 1997, 30(6): 43-48.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 葛胜娟. 生姜组培苗的培育及其生产应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(5): 75-78.
GE S J.Study on culture of tube-plantlets of ginger and its application in production[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(5): 75-78.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 梅丽, 李仁崑, 王立征, 等. 脱毒甘薯不同世代的生长特性、产量及品质表现[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(35): 36-45.
MEI L, LI R K, WANG L Z, et al.Growth characteristics, yield and quality performance of virus-free sweet potato with different generations[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(35): 36-45.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 王林生, 孔祥生, 李友军, 等. 徐薯18脱毒薯苗不同世代干物质积累与分配规律研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2000, 19(2): 99-101.
WANG L S, KONG X S, LI Y J, et al.The law of accumulation and distribution of dry matter on four generation virus free cutting of Xushu 18[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural, 2000, 19(2): 99-101.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 汤青林, 王小佳, 宋明, 等. 组培芋苗不同世代的差异研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(2): 66-69.
TANG Q L, WANG X J, SONG M, et al.Research of the discrepancy of tissue culture-derived taro in different generations[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 29(2): 66-69.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] DONG F, ZHANG D W, ZHANG C F, et al.Study on virus-free culture and rapid propagation technology of Xiangshu series varieties of sweet potato[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18(12): 2197-2201.
[15] 唐学军, 黄盛, 李晓晖, 等. 组培生姜高温条件下覆盖不同遮光率遮阳网试验初报[J]. 南方园艺, 2014, 25(6): 31-32.
TANG X J, HUANG S, LI X H, et al.Preliminary report on tissue culture ginger shading nets covered with different shading rates under high temperature conditions[J]. Southern Horticulture, 2014, 25(6): 31-32.(in Chinese)
[16] SHI P J, MEN X Y, SANDHU H S, et al.The “general” ontogenetic growth model is inapplicable to crop growth[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2013, 266: 1-9.
[17] MOUSTAKAS N K, NTZANIS H.Dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)[J]. Field Crops Research, 2005, 94(1): 1-13.
[18] WU H I, CHAKRABORTY A, LI B L, et al.Formulating variable carrying capacity by exploring a resource dynamics-based feedback mechanism underlying the population growth models[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2009, 6(4): 403-412.
[19] 卢会翔, 唐道彬, 吴正丹, 等. 甘薯产量、品质及农艺性状的基因型与环境效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(9): 1158-1168.
LU H X, TANG D B, WU Z D, et al.Genotypic variation and environmental effects on yield, quality and agronomic traits of sweet potato[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(9): 1158-1168.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 李秀, 徐坤, 巩彪, 等. 生姜农艺性状与产量形成关系的多重分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12): 2431-2437.
LI X, XU K, GONG B, et al.Multiple analysis of relationship of agronomic traits and yield formation in ginger[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2431-2437.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 刘子学. 不同世代脱毒马铃薯光合特性研究[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2011, 25(4): 206-209.
LIU Z X.Photosynthetic characters of different generations of virus-free potato[J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2011, 25(4): 206-209.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 刘志超, 胡万群, 刘道敏, 等. 脱毒马铃薯不同世代种植比较[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2006, 12(8): 85.
LIU Z C, HU W Q, LIU D M, et al.Comparison of planting virus-free potatoes in different generations[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 12(8): 85.(in Chinese)
[23] 孟令文, 孙恩玉, 于晓莹. 脱毒马铃薯不同世代生长特性及产量的研究[J]. 杂粮作物, 2003, 23(6): 348-349.
MENG L W, SUN E Y, YU X Y.Studies on growth character and yield of different virus-free potato generation[J]. Rain Fed Crops, 2003, 23(6): 348-349.(in Chinese)

不同世代生姜组培苗物质生产特性与产量形成差异

Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李金武, 郁继华, 吕剑, 冯致, 杨海兴, 车旭升, 秦启杰, 张洋, 金宁. 不同覆盖方式对高原夏季露地松花菜产量、品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.
[2]	郑许松, 钟列权, 王会福, 陈方景, 成丽萍, 徐启强, 李阳, 钟旭华, 吕仲贤. 减肥控制病虫害技术在浙江省不同稻区的实践[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1656-1664.
[3]	张统帅, 闫丽娟, 李广, 陈国鹏, 罗永忠. 免耕和秸秆覆盖对旱作区土壤氮素、水分和春小麦产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341.
[4]	韩立杰, 董伟欣, 张月辰. 不同水肥处理对小麦冠层结构、产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 953-962.
[5]	柯义强, 郭鹏辉, 马洪鑫, 杨许花, 高丹丹, 刘湘君, 马忠仁, 丁功涛. 兰州百合组培快繁体系的构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1000-1008.
[6]	李乐, 田敏娇, 高艳明, 李建设. 硒肥对基质培番茄生长和矿质元素积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 253-261.
[7]	韩悌倩, 刘震, 刘玉汇, 张小静, 王丽, 张俊莲. 减氮及有机替代对马铃薯根系形态和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2111-2118.
[8]	鲍烈, 王曼韬, 刘江川, 文波, 明月. 基于卷积神经网络的小麦产量预估方法[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2244-2252.
[9]	马瑞芳, 马进川, 马军伟, 周大云, 王强, 丁潮洪. 四季豆丽芸2号生长动态及其养分吸收规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 80-85.
[10]	陶晶, 邬奇峰, 石江, 李松昊, 葛江飞, 陈俊辉, 徐秋芳, 梁辰飞, 秦华. 间作与接种丛枝菌根真菌对新垦山地玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 115-123.
[11]	潘俊峰, 钟旭华, 黄农荣, 刘彦卓, 田卡, 梁开明, 彭碧琳, 傅友强, 胡香玉. 不同栽培模式对华南双季晚稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 857-868.
[12]	王保君, 程旺大, 陈贵, 沈亚强, 张红梅. 秸秆还田配合氮肥减量对稻田土壤养分、碳库及水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 624-630.
[13]	吴兴慧, 张余, 李振宙, 周良, 黄小燕, 陈庆富, 黄凯丰. 不同耕作方式对苦荞衰老和籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 1963-1970.
[14]	马鹏, 杨志远, 李郁, 林郸, 孙永健, 马均. 轮作体系下麦/油减量施氮与水稻氮肥运筹对作物产量和氮素吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1769-1778.
[15]	李虹桥, 段秋宇, 刘士山, 杨云飞, 李梦颖, 吴永成. 甘蓝型矮秆油菜与高秆油菜的产量与氮效率比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1796-1802.