浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 1095-1103.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.06.15
田玉潭a(
), 马露b, 刘军a,b, 李冬冬a,b, 陶迎梅a,b, 赵晓璐a, 马亚男a, 孙少忆a, 刘敦华a,b,*(
)
收稿日期:2020-09-20
出版日期:2021-06-25
发布日期:2021-06-25
作者简介:*刘敦华,E-mail: dunhualiu@126.com通讯作者:
刘敦华
基金资助:
TIAN Yutana(
), MA Lub, LIU Junaa,b, LI Dongdonga,b, TAO Yingmeia,b, ZHAO Xiaolua, MA Yanana, SUN Shaoyia, LIU Dunhuaa,b,*(
)
Received:2020-09-20
Online:2021-06-25
Published:2021-06-25
Contact:
LIU Dunhua
摘要:
为开发一种适用于水煮羊肉贮藏的可食性复合膜,以迷迭香(3%)复合膜、茶多酚(3%)复合膜和保鲜膜为对照组,利用不同浓度(1%、3%、5%)的葡萄酒渣多酚-壳聚糖-CMC复合膜和对照组膜处理水煮羊肉,分析其在冷藏[(4±1)℃]期间的感官特性、pH、色度、硫代巴比妥酸(thiobarbituric acid, TBA)值、挥发性盐基氮(TVB-N)、菌落总数,根据结果筛选最佳复合膜,并对其贮藏期间的挥发性物质进行研究。结果表明:5%葡萄酒渣多酚-壳聚糖-CMC复合膜处理效果最佳,可以有效改善羊肉的色泽,延缓脂质氧化;贮藏至第9天时,5%多酚膜处理组感官特性、抑菌性显著(P<0.05)优于其他复合膜处理组,TVB-N低于限值;贮藏至第12天时,5%多酚膜处理组pH显著(P<0.05)低于其他复合膜处理组;羊肉的贮藏时间可延长至9 d;贮藏时间不同,5%多酚膜处理组挥发性物质含量存在一定的差异。总体上,葡萄酒渣多酚-壳聚糖-CMC复合膜可以有效保持羊肉在贮藏期间的色泽,抑制氧化,减少腐败,延长货架期,有效保持羊肉在贮藏期间的食用品质。
中图分类号:
田玉潭, 马露, 刘军, 李冬冬, 陶迎梅, 赵晓璐, 马亚男, 孙少忆, 刘敦华. 葡萄酒渣多酚-壳聚糖-CMC可食性复合膜在水煮羊肉贮藏中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 1095-1103.
TIAN Yutan, MA Lu, LIU Juna, LI Dongdong, TAO Yingmei, ZHAO Xiaolu, MA Yanan, SUN Shaoyi, LIU Dunhua. Application of edible composite film of wine residue polyphenol-chitosan-CMC during storage of boiled mutton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(6): 1095-1103.
| 项目Project | 感官评价Sensory evaluation | 评分Score |
|---|---|---|
| 色泽Color | 肉颜色正常,有光泽The meat was normal in color and glossy | >30~40 |
| 肉些许发暗,具有光泽The meat was slightly dark and glossy | >16~30 | |
| 肉颜色暗红发褐,无光泽The meat was dark red, brown and lusterless | >0~16 | |
| 气味Smell | 具有熟羊肉特有的气味,无异味Unique smell of cooked mutton, no peculiar smell | >30~40 |
| 具有熟羊肉的香味,但不浓郁,无异味 Flavor of cooked mutton, but it was not rich and has no peculiar smell | >16~30 | |
| 熟羊肉的特有气味消失,有异味Unique smell of cooked mutton disappears and had peculiar smell | >0~16 | |
| 总体可接受程度 | 喜欢Like | >15~20 |
| General acceptability | 一般Commonly | >8~15 |
| 不喜欢Dislike | >0~8 |
表1 水煮羊肉的感官评分标准
Table 1 Standard of sensory evaluation of boiled mutton
| 项目Project | 感官评价Sensory evaluation | 评分Score |
|---|---|---|
| 色泽Color | 肉颜色正常,有光泽The meat was normal in color and glossy | >30~40 |
| 肉些许发暗,具有光泽The meat was slightly dark and glossy | >16~30 | |
| 肉颜色暗红发褐,无光泽The meat was dark red, brown and lusterless | >0~16 | |
| 气味Smell | 具有熟羊肉特有的气味,无异味Unique smell of cooked mutton, no peculiar smell | >30~40 |
| 具有熟羊肉的香味,但不浓郁,无异味 Flavor of cooked mutton, but it was not rich and has no peculiar smell | >16~30 | |
| 熟羊肉的特有气味消失,有异味Unique smell of cooked mutton disappears and had peculiar smell | >0~16 | |
| 总体可接受程度 | 喜欢Like | >15~20 |
| General acceptability | 一般Commonly | >8~15 |
| 不喜欢Dislike | >0~8 |
| 处理组 Processing group | 保鲜膜 Fresh keeping film | 茶多酚膜 Tea polyphenol film | 迷迭香膜 Rosemary film | 1%多酚膜 1% polyphenol film | 3%多酚膜 3% polyphenol film | 5%多酚膜 5% polyphenol film | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 感官指标 Sensory index | 贮藏时间 Storage time/d | ||||||
| 颜色 | 0 | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA |
| Colour | 3 | 38.40±0.40 aA | 35.74±0.61 abB | 29.66±0.15 cB | 32.54±1.62 bcB | 34.26±1.36 abB | 33.60±1.83 bcB |
| 6 | 25.74±3.01 bB | 27.34±0.58 abC | 16.94±1.08 cC | 29.34±0.58 abC | 27.34±0.58abC | 32.40±0.72 aB | |
| 9 | 17.94±0.38 cC | 24.94±0.75 abD | 12.46±0.93 dD | 22.66±0.47 bD | 25.14±0.80 abC | 26.34±1.21 aC | |
| 12 | 12.54±1.10 bcD | 16.94±0.84 aE | 9.20±0.90 cE | 16.06±0.61 abE | 16.26±1.50 abD | 19.06±0.91 aD | |
| 气味Smell | 0 | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA |
| 3 | 30.66±3.40 aB | 35.74±0.61 aB | 34.94±0.46 aB | 34.14±0.83 aB | 30.80±1.22 aB | 33.20±0.53 aB | |
| 6 | 21.60±0.72 cC | 27.34±0.58 abC | 30.26±0.81 aC | 27.54±1.57 abC | 25.46±0.81 bcC | 30.14±1.79 aBC | |
| 9 | 16.14±0.57 eC | 19.14±0.59 dD | 19.40±0.72 dD | 24.60±0.72 bC | 22.06±0.68 cD | 27.46±0.21 aC | |
| 12 | 8.80±0.78 eD | 15.66±0.35 cdE | 13.86±0.67 dE | 17.14±1.07 bcD | 18.66±0.51 bE | 21.74±0.91 aD | |
| 总体可接受度 | 0 | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA |
| Overall | 3 | 14.93±2.72 aB | 17.07±1.01 aB | 16.67±0.61 aB | 16.27±1.62 aB | 15.73±1.89 aB | 17.17±0.35 aB |
| acceptability | 6 | 11.67±0.58 cC | 13.33±1.53 bC | 13.87±0.23 bC | 13.87±0.23 bC | 14.00±1.00 bB | 16.33±0.58 aC |
| 9 | 8.67±1.53 cD | 11.90±1.21 bC | 11.77±0.95 bD | 11.77±1.00 bD | 12.13±0.32 bC | 15.37±0.51 aD | |
| 12 | 6.67±1.53 cD | 8.90±0.78 bD | 9.03±0.68 bE | 9.37±0.50 abE | 10.13±0.49 abD | 10.87±0.06 aE | |
表2 不同膜处理羊肉在4 ℃贮藏期间颜色、气味、总体可接受度的变化
Table 2 Changes of color, odor and overall acceptability of mutton treated with different films during storage at 4 ℃
| 处理组 Processing group | 保鲜膜 Fresh keeping film | 茶多酚膜 Tea polyphenol film | 迷迭香膜 Rosemary film | 1%多酚膜 1% polyphenol film | 3%多酚膜 3% polyphenol film | 5%多酚膜 5% polyphenol film | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 感官指标 Sensory index | 贮藏时间 Storage time/d | ||||||
| 颜色 | 0 | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA |
| Colour | 3 | 38.40±0.40 aA | 35.74±0.61 abB | 29.66±0.15 cB | 32.54±1.62 bcB | 34.26±1.36 abB | 33.60±1.83 bcB |
| 6 | 25.74±3.01 bB | 27.34±0.58 abC | 16.94±1.08 cC | 29.34±0.58 abC | 27.34±0.58abC | 32.40±0.72 aB | |
| 9 | 17.94±0.38 cC | 24.94±0.75 abD | 12.46±0.93 dD | 22.66±0.47 bD | 25.14±0.80 abC | 26.34±1.21 aC | |
| 12 | 12.54±1.10 bcD | 16.94±0.84 aE | 9.20±0.90 cE | 16.06±0.61 abE | 16.26±1.50 abD | 19.06±0.91 aD | |
| 气味Smell | 0 | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA | 40.00±0 aA |
| 3 | 30.66±3.40 aB | 35.74±0.61 aB | 34.94±0.46 aB | 34.14±0.83 aB | 30.80±1.22 aB | 33.20±0.53 aB | |
| 6 | 21.60±0.72 cC | 27.34±0.58 abC | 30.26±0.81 aC | 27.54±1.57 abC | 25.46±0.81 bcC | 30.14±1.79 aBC | |
| 9 | 16.14±0.57 eC | 19.14±0.59 dD | 19.40±0.72 dD | 24.60±0.72 bC | 22.06±0.68 cD | 27.46±0.21 aC | |
| 12 | 8.80±0.78 eD | 15.66±0.35 cdE | 13.86±0.67 dE | 17.14±1.07 bcD | 18.66±0.51 bE | 21.74±0.91 aD | |
| 总体可接受度 | 0 | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA | 20.00±0 aA |
| Overall | 3 | 14.93±2.72 aB | 17.07±1.01 aB | 16.67±0.61 aB | 16.27±1.62 aB | 15.73±1.89 aB | 17.17±0.35 aB |
| acceptability | 6 | 11.67±0.58 cC | 13.33±1.53 bC | 13.87±0.23 bC | 13.87±0.23 bC | 14.00±1.00 bB | 16.33±0.58 aC |
| 9 | 8.67±1.53 cD | 11.90±1.21 bC | 11.77±0.95 bD | 11.77±1.00 bD | 12.13±0.32 bC | 15.37±0.51 aD | |
| 12 | 6.67±1.53 cD | 8.90±0.78 bD | 9.03±0.68 bE | 9.37±0.50 abE | 10.13±0.49 abD | 10.87±0.06 aE | |
图1 不同膜处理羊肉在4 ℃贮藏期间的pH变化 无相同小写字母表示贮藏相同时间不同处理之间差异显著(P<0.05),无相同大写字母表示同一处理不同贮藏时间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Changes of pH value of mutton treated with different films during storage at 4 ℃ Without the same lowercase letters indicated significant difference among different treatments at the same storage time (P<0.05), Without the same capital letters indicated significant difference in the same treatment at different storage time (P<0.05). The same as below.
| 色度指标 Color index | 贮藏时间 Storage time/d | 保鲜膜 Fresh keeping film | 茶多酚膜 Tea polyphenol film | 迷迭香膜 Rosemary film | 1%多酚膜 1% polyphenol film | 3%多酚膜 3% polyphenol film | 5%多酚膜 5% polyphenol film |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | 0 | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA |
| 3 | 55.11±1.08 aB | 46.10±2.74 bB | 38.89±4.81 bcBC | 45.85±5.98 bB | 35.07±3.09 cC | 36.10±0.87 cC | |
| 6 | 42.56±1.04 bcC | 55.04±3.68 aA | 35.32±2.32 dC | 42.02±1.44 bcBC | 37.01±5.73 cdC | 44.61±3.75 bB | |
| 9 | 51.33±1.83 aB | 46.03±2.50 bcB | 42.69±0.67 cB | 38.46±2.78 dCD | 44.37±2.75 bcB | 47.45±2.76 abB | |
| 12 | 53.45±1.46 aB | 34.26±2.51 cC | 40.40±1.61 bBC | 35.29±0.30 cD | 36.90±3.13 bcC | 35.94±2.10 cC | |
| a* | 0 | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA |
| 3 | 8.49±0.70 cB | 9.93±0.67 abcA | 11.90±2.16 aA | 9.60±0.46 bcB | 10.78±0.93 abA | 9.47±0.89 bcAB | |
| 6 | 7.49±0.18 bC | 8.20±0.92 abB | 10.07±0.78 aA | 9.00±1.05 abB | 8.70±1.25 abB | 8.59±1.46 abBC | |
| 9 | 6.22±0.22 cD | 7.22±0.97 bcB | 10.11±1.30 aA | 8.77±1.05 abB | 8.55±1.58 abB | 7.70±1.41 bcBC | |
| 12 | 5.46±0.51 dD | 7.02±0.97 cB | 11.06±0.96 aA | 6.50±0.77 cdC | 8.69±0.46 bB | 6.97±0.71 cC | |
| b* | 0 | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC |
| 3 | 14.51±1.58 abB | 15.53±1.27 aA | 11.21±3.78 bA | 11.31±1.42 bA | 11.72±0.48 bB | 12.93±0.86 abABC | |
| 6 | 14.89±1.12 aB | 15.11±1.92 aA | 12.15±1.90 abA | 12.88±0.37 abA | 10.21±0.69 bBC | 14.09±2.39 aAB | |
| 9 | 15.99±0.70 aAB | 13.68±1.05 abAB | 11.25±4.24 abA | 11.10±3.46 bA | 14.12±1.33 abA | 14.91±1.79 abA | |
| 12 | 16.91±0.94 aA | 11.40±3.43 bB | 9.38±0.59 bA | 9.87±0.43 bA | 8.05±2.27 bC | 10.87±0.06 aE |
表3 不同膜处理羊肉在4 ℃贮藏期间的色度变化
Table 3 Color changes of mutton treated with different films during storage at 4 ℃
| 色度指标 Color index | 贮藏时间 Storage time/d | 保鲜膜 Fresh keeping film | 茶多酚膜 Tea polyphenol film | 迷迭香膜 Rosemary film | 1%多酚膜 1% polyphenol film | 3%多酚膜 3% polyphenol film | 5%多酚膜 5% polyphenol film |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | 0 | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA | 59.38±3.62 aA |
| 3 | 55.11±1.08 aB | 46.10±2.74 bB | 38.89±4.81 bcBC | 45.85±5.98 bB | 35.07±3.09 cC | 36.10±0.87 cC | |
| 6 | 42.56±1.04 bcC | 55.04±3.68 aA | 35.32±2.32 dC | 42.02±1.44 bcBC | 37.01±5.73 cdC | 44.61±3.75 bB | |
| 9 | 51.33±1.83 aB | 46.03±2.50 bcB | 42.69±0.67 cB | 38.46±2.78 dCD | 44.37±2.75 bcB | 47.45±2.76 abB | |
| 12 | 53.45±1.46 aB | 34.26±2.51 cC | 40.40±1.61 bBC | 35.29±0.30 cD | 36.90±3.13 bcC | 35.94±2.10 cC | |
| a* | 0 | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA | 11.24±0.23 aA |
| 3 | 8.49±0.70 cB | 9.93±0.67 abcA | 11.90±2.16 aA | 9.60±0.46 bcB | 10.78±0.93 abA | 9.47±0.89 bcAB | |
| 6 | 7.49±0.18 bC | 8.20±0.92 abB | 10.07±0.78 aA | 9.00±1.05 abB | 8.70±1.25 abB | 8.59±1.46 abBC | |
| 9 | 6.22±0.22 cD | 7.22±0.97 bcB | 10.11±1.30 aA | 8.77±1.05 abB | 8.55±1.58 abB | 7.70±1.41 bcBC | |
| 12 | 5.46±0.51 dD | 7.02±0.97 cB | 11.06±0.96 aA | 6.50±0.77 cdC | 8.69±0.46 bB | 6.97±0.71 cC | |
| b* | 0 | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC | 10.57±0.47 aC |
| 3 | 14.51±1.58 abB | 15.53±1.27 aA | 11.21±3.78 bA | 11.31±1.42 bA | 11.72±0.48 bB | 12.93±0.86 abABC | |
| 6 | 14.89±1.12 aB | 15.11±1.92 aA | 12.15±1.90 abA | 12.88±0.37 abA | 10.21±0.69 bBC | 14.09±2.39 aAB | |
| 9 | 15.99±0.70 aAB | 13.68±1.05 abAB | 11.25±4.24 abA | 11.10±3.46 bA | 14.12±1.33 abA | 14.91±1.79 abA | |
| 12 | 16.91±0.94 aA | 11.40±3.43 bB | 9.38±0.59 bA | 9.87±0.43 bA | 8.05±2.27 bC | 10.87±0.06 aE |
| 贮藏时间 Storage time/d | 挥发性物质的相对含量Relative content of volatile substances/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 醛类 Aldehydes | 酮类 Ketones | 烷烃类 Alkanes | 醇类 Alcohols | 烯烃 Alkenes | 杂环化合物 Heterocyclic compounds | |
| 0 | 46.49 c | 5.18 a | 9.15 c | 8.14 e | 0.84 c | 21.16 d |
| 3 | 43.88 d | 3.32 b | 4.31 e | 10.56 b | 0.72 e | 23.47 c |
| 6 | 46.50 c | 3.28 c | 13.53 a | 9.55 d | 2.16 b | 30.64 b |
| 9 | 50.91 b | 3.28 c | 7.95 b | 10.18 c | 4.22 a | 31.03 a |
| 12 | 52.85 a | 3.10 d | 9.45 d | 11.14 a | 0.75 d | 16.99 e |
表4 羊肉在4 ℃贮藏期间挥发性物质的相对含量
Table 4 Relative content of volatile substances in mutton during storage at 4 ℃
| 贮藏时间 Storage time/d | 挥发性物质的相对含量Relative content of volatile substances/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 醛类 Aldehydes | 酮类 Ketones | 烷烃类 Alkanes | 醇类 Alcohols | 烯烃 Alkenes | 杂环化合物 Heterocyclic compounds | |
| 0 | 46.49 c | 5.18 a | 9.15 c | 8.14 e | 0.84 c | 21.16 d |
| 3 | 43.88 d | 3.32 b | 4.31 e | 10.56 b | 0.72 e | 23.47 c |
| 6 | 46.50 c | 3.28 c | 13.53 a | 9.55 d | 2.16 b | 30.64 b |
| 9 | 50.91 b | 3.28 c | 7.95 b | 10.18 c | 4.22 a | 31.03 a |
| 12 | 52.85 a | 3.10 d | 9.45 d | 11.14 a | 0.75 d | 16.99 e |
| [1] | 李月明, 刘飞, 姜雪晶, 等. 生物可降解膜在肉品保鲜中的应用研究进展[J]. 肉类研究, 2017,31(6):51-54. |
| LI Y M, LIU F, JIANG X J, et al. Application of antibacterial slow-release biodegradable film in meat preservation: a review[J]. Meat Research, 2017,31(6):51-54.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] |
CUI H Y, SURENDHIRAN D, LI C Z, et al. Biodegradable zein active film containing chitosan nanoparticle encapsulated with pomegranate peel extract for food packaging[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2020,24:100511.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
ALBERTOS I, MARTIN-DIANA A B, BURÓN M , et al. Development of functional bio-based seaweed (Himanthalia elongata and Palmaria palmata) edible films for extending the shelf life of fresh fish Burgers[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2019,22:100382.
DOI URL |
| [4] | 王正荣, 马汉军. 迷迭香与壳聚糖涂膜对猪肉饼的复合保鲜效果[J]. 肉类研究, 2016,30(7):21-25. |
| WANG Z R, MA H J. Preservation effect of chitosan coating incorporated with rosemary on pork patties[J]. Meat Research, 2016,30(7):21-25.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 于林, 陈舜胜, 王娟娟, 等. 茶多酚改性胶原蛋白-壳聚糖复合膜对冷藏斜带石斑鱼的保鲜效果[J]. 食品科学, 2017,38(3):220-226. |
| YU L, CHEN S S, WANG J J, et al. Preservation effect of collagen-chitosan blend film modified by tea polyphenols on grouper (Epinephelus coioides) fillets stored at 4 ℃[J]. Food Science, 2017,38(3):220-226.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 祝美云, 林顺顺, 王颖. 壳聚糖复合膜对黄瓜生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2010,22(6):774-778. |
| ZHU M Y, LIN S S, WANG Y. Effects of composite film on cucumber’s physiological changes during storage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2010,22(6):774-778.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] |
KY I, LORRAIN B, KOLBAS N, et al. Wine by-products: phenolic characterization and antioxidant activity evaluation of grapes and grape pomaces from six different French grape varieties[J]. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2014,19(1):482-506.
DOI URL |
| [8] | 高新梅. 饲粮不同水平葡萄籽酿酒残渣对育肥羊养分消化代谢的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2018. |
| GAO X M. Effects of different levels of grape seed residue after distillation on nutrient digestion and metabolism in fattening sheep[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 李浡, 李双石, 岳明星, 等. 酶法提取葡萄酒渣多酚的含量与抗氧化性分析[J]. 酿酒科技, 2017(12):37-40. |
| LI B, LI S S, YUE M X, et al. Total polyphenol content and antioxidant activities of the extract from grape skin residues by enzyme method[J]. Liquor-Making Science & Technology, 2017(12):37-40.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 王倩, 纠敏, 孟媛媛, 等. 冬凌草甲素/壳聚糖复合膜对冰鲜鸡胸肉的保鲜效果[J]. 食品与机械, 2021,37(3):125-130. |
| WANG Q, JIU M, MENG Y Y, et al. Preservation effect of oridonin/ chitosan composite film on chilled chicken breast[J]. Food and Machinery, 2021,37(3):125-130.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 孔维洲. 一种发酵鹿肉干的制备及货架期预测模型的建立[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2019. |
| KONG W Z. Preparation of fermented dried venison and establishment of its shelf life prediction model[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 邵金良, 杨芳, 杜丽娟, 等. 肉与肉制品中挥发性盐基氮测定方法的改进[J]. 肉类研究, 2009,23(10):58-60. |
| SHAO J L, YANG F, DU L J, et al. Determine TVB-N in meat and meat products by improved means[J]. Meat Research, 2009,23(10):58-60.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 丁晔, 刘敦华, 雷建刚, 等. 不同处理羊羔肉挥发性风味物质的比较及主成分分析[J]. 食品与机械, 2013,29(3):16-20. |
| DING Y, LIU D H, LEI J G, et al. Comparison of different treatment lamb volatile flavor compounds and principal component analysis[J]. Food & Machinery, 2013,29(3):16-20.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] |
BARBUT S. Pale, soft, and exudative poultry meat: reviewing ways to manage at the processing plant[J]. Poultry Science, 2009,88(7):1506-1512.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
ZHANG Y, ZHOU L B, ZHANG C, et al. Preparation and characterization of curdlan/polyvinyl alcohol/ thyme essential oil blending film and its application to chilled meat preservation[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020,247:116670.
DOI URL |
| [16] | 张慧芸, 郭新宇. 丁香精油-壳聚糖复合可食性膜对生肉糜保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2014,35(18):196-200. |
| ZHANG H Y, GUO X Y. Effect of chitosan films incorporated with clove essential oil on quality and shelf life of pork patties[J]. Food Science, 2014,35(18):196-200.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] |
BREWER M S, ZHU L G, BIDNER B, et al. Measuring pork color: effects of bloom time, muscle, pH and relationship to instrumental parameters[J]. Meat Science, 2001,57(2):169-176.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
SHEARD P R, ENSER M, WOOD J D, et al. Shelf life and quality of pork and pork products with raised n-3 PUFA[J]. Meat Science, 2000,55(2):213-221.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
ARANCIBIA M Y, LÓPEZ-CABALLERO M E, GÓMEZ-GUILLÉN M C, et al. Chitosan coatings enriched with active shrimp waste for shrimp preservation[J]. Food Control, 2015,54:259-266.
DOI URL |
| [20] | 中华人民共和国商务部. 预制肉类食品质量安全要求:SB/T 10482—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
| [21] | KARABAGIAS I, BADEKA A, KONTOMINAS M G. Shelf life extension of lamb meat using thyme or oregano essential oils and modified atmosphere packaging[J]. Meat Science, 2011,88(1):109-116. |
| [22] | 臧明伍, 王宇, 韩凯, 等. 北京清真酱牛肉挥发性风味化合物的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2010,31(8):70-73. |
| ZANG M W, WANG Y, HAN K, et al. Study on volatile flavor compounds of Beijing moslemic braised beef with soy sauce[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2010,31(8):70-73.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 王乐田, 王莹莹, 贾娜, 等. 沟帮子烧鸡冷藏过程中脂肪氧化及挥发性物质的变化[J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2015,51(4):23-29. |
| WANG L T, WANG Y Y, JIA N, et al. Changes of lipid oxidation and the volatile substances of Goubangzi roast chicken during chilled storage[J]. Food and Fermentation Technology, 2015,51(4):23-29.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 潘丽军, 何宇洁, 蔡克周, 等. 顶空固相微萃取-气质联用法测定哈尔滨红肠的挥发性风味物质[J]. 食品科学, 2012,33(10):232-236. |
| PAN L J, HE Y J, CAI K Z, et al. Volatile analysis of Harbin sausage by head space solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Food Science, 2012,33(10):232-236.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 徐永霞, 刘滢, 仪淑敏, 等. 大菱鲆鱼体不同部位的挥发性成分分析[J]. 中国食品学报, 2014,14(6):236-243. |
| XU Y X, LIU Y, YI S M, et al. Comparison of volatile compounds in different parts of turbot[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2014,14(6):236-243.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 尚永彪, 吴金凤, 夏杨毅, 等. 农家腊肉冷熏加工过程中挥发性风味物质的变化[J]. 食品科学, 2009,30(17):79-83. |
| SHANG Y B, WU J F, XIA Y Y, et al. Changes of volatile flavor compounds in traditional Chinese bacon during cold smoking[J]. Food Science, 2009,30(17):79-83.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 高晓冉, 刘程惠, 陈立国, 等. 壳寡糖与茶多酚复合保鲜剂对冷鲜牛肉的保鲜效果[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019,45(11):172-178. |
| GAO X R, LIU C H, CHEN L G, et al. Preservative effects of chitosan oligosaccharide and tea polyphenol together on chilled beef[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019,45(11):172-178.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 史建如. 壳聚糖基褐藻多酚可食膜的制备及其在大菱鲆冷藏保鲜中的应用[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2018. |
| SHI J R. Preparation of chitosan based phlorotannins edible films and the application on Scophthalmus maximus shelf-life extending during refrigerated storage[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] |
FANG Z X, LIN D, WARNER R D, et al. Effect of gallic acid/chitosan coating on fresh pork quality in modified atmosphere packaging[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018,260:90-96.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
FARAJZADEH F, MOTAMEDZADEGAN A, SHAHIDI S A, et al. The effect of chitosan-gelatin coating on the quality of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) under refrigerated condition[J]. Food Control, 2016,67:163-170.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 陈巍, 王荣荣, 蒋雯静, 耿伟淞, 陈岑. 壳聚糖-壳寡糖复合膜的制备及其在草莓保鲜中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1785-1793. |
| [2] | 袁晓, 蒋园园, 朱云娜, 曲姗姗, 王玉昆, 原远, 王斌. JAZ家族基因在采后黄瓜低温贮藏条件下的表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1820-1831. |
| [3] | 叶沁, 孟祥河, 陈黎洪. 添加米糠腌制对酱鸭理化品质与脂肪氧化特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 634-642. |
| [4] | 赵凌吉, 廖香娇, 刘德春, 胡威, 匡柳青, 宋杰, 易明亮, 刘勇, 杨莉. 桃溪蜜柚果实贮藏期有机酸含量变化及相关基因表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2510-2520. |
| [5] | 宗自豪, 何丁生, 牛犇, 黄俊, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 不同镂空包装对雨天采收杨梅贮运品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 196-204. |
| [6] | 王诗瑶, 辛镇忠, 王连, 王愈. beta@壳聚糖保鲜涂层的制备及其对太谷梨枣品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2212-2221. |
| [7] | 肖立涵, 辛美果, 卢文静, 叶沁, 张岑, 肖朝耿, 谌迪. 不同贮藏条件对3种花粉源蜂王浆品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1161-1167. |
| [8] | 杨清, 刘胜红, 黄二宾, 杜嵘宇, 王芳, 邓佳. 经羧甲基壳聚糖诱导的葡萄柚果实转录组WRKY基因分析及抗性相关基因挖掘[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 598-614. |
| [9] | 黄秋伟, 毛立彦, 檀小辉, 王丽萍, 刘功德, 彭继飞, 龙凌云. 贮藏温度对广西旱藕采后重要品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 346-354. |
| [10] | 张馨月, 杨禹诚, 段皓月, 周杨洁, 黄嘉杨, 陈梓月, 蒋洁, 陈姝娟. 氮掺杂碳量子点-壳聚糖复合膜的制备及对草莓的保鲜效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(12): 2935-2943. |
| [11] | 清源, 方志荣, 姚昕, 尹胜. 不同贮藏温度下印度块菌净菜品质变化及其货架期研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2698-2709. |
| [12] | 李永晖, 李捷, 冯丽丹, 何静, 张煦, 刘祥林. 不同植物免疫诱抗剂对枸杞鲜果产量、抗病性和贮藏能力的差异比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 164-174. |
| [13] | 任梦云, 杜龙岗, 王美兴, 黄益峰. 糯玉米可溶性糖组分特征与采后品质特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1133-1140. |
| [14] | 张映萍, 唐宏刚, 李欢欢, 张晋, 陈黎洪, 杨叶爽, 王复龙, 陈伊凡, 朱仁俊. 不同色素和包装方式对中式香肠贮藏品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 360-369. |
| [15] | 张娜, 周慕川, 王庆港, 丁玉先, 陈爱强. 热水处理对南丰蜜橘贮藏品质的影响及传热分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 370-377. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||